The photos were obviously altered to make Steinberg and Reddicliffe "appear more Jewish." If you look at antisemitic cartoons and propaganda, they tend to have enlarged noses and dark circles around their eyes, and typically more "sinister." Then, Fox airs the openly altered photo of them as dogs, to camouflage the two altered "Jewish" photos before.
@Musicmaster182 Yup, that's how dumb American viewers are. Also the difference between a network television broadcaster and an online show. Congrats, you're a genius.
Progressives don't need any help they are negative, there fucking retarded, I didnt have to watch fox news to figure that out, fucking retard. Socialist scum bag.
@RayTech70 ironic isn't it that it was the ConservaDrones who wanted to Literally Re-wright history books. Saying that america is a christian nation and all the founding fathers where Christian, all bull shit.
Didn't you get the memo?
It is well known that reality has a strong liberal bias.
I'd rather see photo shopped reporters than what the liberals give us: revisionist history... Liberats are just stupid people doing stupid things like this.
@wulfmanUNCP HAHA conservatives have thick skin? Blaming the media or their own ignorance is bread and butter Republican talking points, which you repeat.
@wulfmanUNCP Republicans have forgotten what their political party means. If you can tell me the basic principles of what your own party represents I will humor you.
Secondly, I neither require, nor desire, your humor. It changes nothing about the fact that while this is underhanded, at best, it highlights how Cenk here can't seem to get his hard-on down for FOX.
Reagan is the one that started this, which is what's referred to as the "Body politic".
It was said that a member of white house staff once scoffed at a cbs news correspondent "the picture always overrides what you say".
As much as we know that the pictures are doctored now, the viewers who seen that piece probably don't. What Fox news does is try to build up negative stereotypes of progressives.
It's not funny when they have such a large talking piece and growing influence.
@CrackeTheSkull you can, you just need to do it frame by frame and then put it back together. it would take a ridiculous amount of time but you can do it
@vict0r1ous dude. usually they photoshop to make them look BETTER...FOX did these photoshop'd pics to make them look WORSE, make them look evil by darkening the eyes. wake up man
@vict0r1ous i know u didn't say anything about making them better or worse, moron. thats why i commented about it. USUALLY when u photoshop something like celebs do..its to make them look BETTER. not to make them look WORSE so they seem more "evil" and to make a point. FOX deliberately made these guys look bad so their viewers would go ooo he looks evil so FOX must be right! pfff...that's what the fucking NAZIS! did to make jews look like scum in the 1930s - 1940's.
@19996669991 maybe you should look into that a little more. cause abc news and comedy central are both owned by disney. so is msnbc.... and by extension. young turks.
@guywithmac msnbc is owned by nbc, which is/was owned by general electric, who also owns universal studios in hollywood. comcast is in the process of buying nbc from g.e. the last time i looked, neither g.e. or comcast are owned by disney. but then you've looked into it a little more so you think you know the facts...right?
in reality it's YOU who maybe should look into that a little more. it always amazes me how the self righteous, like you, are always the biggest fools!
@thejcjmguy yes, i agree with you 100%. i hope you don't think i was standing up for fox in any way shape or manner. they are nothing but a slander factor.
i just wanted to comment on the fact that guywithmac is highly misinformed (regarding msnbc)...which probably comes from the fact he thinks fox is all knowing and all powerful.
@MrTrotskysGhost I mean't 'freeer' thank America; yes I know Murdoch still controls basically everything here too - but at least we have left-wingers that are taken seriously and not just called 'communists' at every available opportunity.
You know, there's no real way of technically proving this unless you personally ask everybody who watches Fox News, but it'd be hilarious if it turned out that the only reason Fox had so many viewers was because the majority of them just wanted to watch so they could mock the shitty reporting and have a good laugh.
You mean the FIRST is so obvious! Especially the nose and teeth! Tho the witj hairline on the second photo, you can CLEARLY see the blur!
But you kno what's even *more* amazing? In addition to being SUPER obvious, it's also such a TERRIBLE 'shoop! I mean, you'd think an organization as big and rich as Fox News would have at least ONE person who can use Photoshop!
this guy constantly bitches about fox news playing dirty, and you know what, every single news station does it, its not news, its ratings. and if this asshole here were to really be against fox, then he wouldn't make fun of them either. he's just as guilty of this bullshit when he's making fun of people. I've seen him brutalize other people, not jstfox nes, he's as much of an asshole as anyone.
@systematic101 Hehe, well I watch both Fox and MSNBC for entertainment, everyone should know that Fox and MSNBC have maybe two hours of news and the rest is all commentary.
@KLsemperFi7 wow... alright, go find some hard evidence of another news station creating as much propaganda as Fox and then chime back in alright? All the computer literate people who know how to use knowledge to their advantage branch out and reach people (the educated bunch who are the future of this country) and make videos like this, exposing liars for what they are.
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 yeah, a bunch of muslims running a crack pot low budget "news" source, he's just as pathetic as any of them, msnbc, fox, cnn, this wanna be news anchor, its all apealing to what people WANT to hear, not what they need to hear. please don't say i lack the education, because i know you do because you actually believe there is a news source that is "hoorable, and has character" you're sadly full of shit, and if you think liberals are the educated... they can't even count to one
@KLsemperFi7 haha, there ya go again just spouting stuff off that either makes no sense or is just completely inviable. Regardless, yes i do believe there are media sources out there with character and (im guessing you meant) honor. Know why, cause ive lived all over this big ass planet and I have seen news from other countries, some in different languages that I understand, some in ones I dont. Get off your high horse of just talking shit about things that you know absolutely nothing about
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 sorry, i didn't know this discussion encompassed the enitre world.... you kidding me, you are gonna play a game over semantics? just shut the fuck up dude, you're wrong. i was speaking about us in the USA, not all the way in the town of bumblefuck in Africa that uses smoke signals and speaks truth to its people. what did i say that made no sense or is inviable? please explain that as well.
Yeah, Abc, Cbs, and Msnbc are biased but atleast they don't like and they are honest. They speak their opinions and don't use fake information to try to make a point.
@KLsemperFi7 well... and again... its cause you are talking about about smoke signals from africa as a source of news. You are talking out your ass, And just making up more racist shit. Go hate gays, praise O'reilly, and bash muslims on some fox news board. I dont think anyone here cares about bigot low-lifes like yourself.
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 you are the one saying i lack intelligence when you clearly do not understand sarcasm. i know its not a source of news, it just went as a blow against your"i been all over the world and seen it all" comment. you're are taking everything literally and not seeing my clearly sarcastic argument with you because i clearly don't give a fuck. i recognize their clear bias, but why not attack msnbc for claiming to be the leader in plitics or cnn for being the worldwide leader?
@KLsemperFi7 well whatever works man. Clearly you havent learned in all the years of there being internet that sarcasm doesnt convey well in written form.
@KLsemperFi7 hold on... someone who is most likely a gay bashin/minority hating republican military fruit knows what literary tools are? this is amazing! <--- that was sarcasm, guess you're right.
I wish someone would put together all the clips from fox news and how they slant the news so horrendously, and make it a feature film. Because if you only watch a couple of youtube videos, then the effect of "fox news is honestly the worst excuse for a news organization imaginable" wears off in a day or so.
In case you don't care if you insult your audiences intellect, take people you want to drag in the dirt and make up false stories and have them look ugly on screen. Fortunately anyone can see this obvious retouche and recognise these childish fox tactics.
@bigjames168s No-one is as bad as FOX... no-one. This 'They're all as bad as each other' doesn't fly. I'm not saying other channels don't suck... but no-one sucks as much as FOX. FOX is in a league of their own when it comes to crass, politically motivated ignorance.
@Keltibarian no, the other news channels just do a better job hiding their false bias. It is all show business CNN, Fox, MSNBC all have the same goal, the dumbing down of the masses to bring in a fascist state. It is all a game to them, it is not Fox v the rest, it is all media v the american citizens.
@Scarpsad yes they are i saw a video were it said that a man in arizona brought a gun with him to a town hall meeting that obama was at but they failed to mention the man was black
Why is it important to make a point of the man being black, you can see he's black when you look at him with the gun straped around his shoulder, you can draw you're own conclusion and think for yourself on that one, you don't need Rachel Maddow to say "BLACK MAN GUUUUUUUNNNNN LOOOOOOK, BLACK MAN WITH GUN"
why do you care what race he is? he's got a gun at a town hall meeting where Obama is coming to that was the issue
@Scarpsad no it only showed the gun strapped around his waist the reason that msnbc did that is because they wanted people to think he was a white tea party memeber going against obama and trying to point out arizona's open gun carry laws
I wish we had TYT in Slovenia... Here the media is totally screwed up, but people are so apathic, they swallow just everything! Watch: "Gola resnica", a documentary on media in Slovenia!
Props to Fox. That was funny. I could tell from the get-go they were photo-shopped, and I think they thought it was obvious, as they continued to play on the joke as they photo-shopped the heads into another picture.
Though I must say, he is right in say they should have mention the pics were photo-shopped. I guess they just didn't figure on there being so many people who couldn't tell the difference.
All media is altered. Some may do it more than others, but if your gonna slam ONE SINGLE news network for altering their news, than you are in fact a hypocrite. If you want the real news, then go research it yourself. Don't rely on a God damn television screen to give you your news input.
just the fact that he says a news person would make any where near a million dollars a year is rediculous. is that true? i assume it false obv, but ffs if that's true i'm about to be a news guy.
in england fox news is not even allowed 2 air...it chats that much shit(not that england is any better, at least the news is the news and not a comedy vhannel
as the rest of the world knows fox news is a joke and they lie and make up their own media stories who no1 takes seriously, apart from americans but no1 really gives 2 stuffs about fox news. what reallty amazes me though , that some people actually buy this fox news trash.. and the idiots that try and defend fox... they wouldnt know news if it bit them on the arse. . fox and friends .... your trash...
The thing is every news channel is biased. The only reason why I watch FOX is because of Glenn Beck. Yes, I said it. I like Glenn Beck. But THIS right here... wow. FOX did stoop pretty low. But you see it on both sides. MSNBC calls FOX racist, and FOX edits photos of peoples faces. It's everywhere. People need to think for themselves though.
Disagree with what? That every news channel is biased? Okay... SEVERAL are. You get my point. News channel are more than likely to be biased than not.
And I just said they stooped pretty low here. Whether or not they're gonna get prosecuted isn't in my hands. I'm not a prosecutor.
Yeah, I'm not. You obviously have a degree in telling people what terms are right and wrong for certain situations. They DID stoop low. I'm sorry to tell you, but "stooping low" means you go to great heights to discredit someone even if it means it'll also make you look bad. Do you want to try and correct me again?
They stooped low, and it IS disgusting. I'm agreeing with you.
Okay so now you resort to deciding who has high morals and who doesn't? Again, you're doing as much slandering as FOX news did in this video.
You pretty much just took my definition and put it in your own words. FOX stooped low, not the people they slandered, by editing their photos. The place where poor morals exist is their decision to edit the photos in the first place. Got it? And when did I write them off? I said they stooped low. That's writing them off?
My point is, MSNBC calls FOX racist, and FOX edits photos of people. Obviously the main objective for both news stations is to discredit something or someone. Between the two they're both childish.
They aren't racist. You're ACCUSING them of being racist because of a few videos on the internet. They make it SEEM like they're racist. They say people think Obama is gonna turn this country around because he's black. That's not being racist, that's stating that the minority looks up to Obama because he's black. That's the TRUTH, that's not being racist. People can't stand the truth and in turn like their "politically correct" terms. People get offended too easily.
Basically what they mean is he's seen as a "turning point" in America's history because he's black which is true. That's not being racist. People have this misconception that that kind of stuff is racist which it isn't.
There's another one of Brian saying how in America we marry everybody. Is that a bad thing? I don't know, but I wouldn't call him racist. Now if he said white and blacks shouldn't be together because blacks are dirty, then yeah I could see how that would be racist.
What I mean is the minority, which black people are a part of, are more likely to like Obama than not to. Just like if every president in history were black and then all of a sudden a white guy finally was made president. It would strike some kind of inspiration in a white person's heart.
Yeah that makes sense. But I don't think Brian meant it in a bad way. It's just like saying a dog is PURE bred. He didn't mean it in a condescending way. Like me. I'm not pure Italian. Only part.
Obviously I'm saying if it were the other way around.
It's only ignorant depending on the way you look at it. If you want to think it's ignorant, go ahead. He told the truth. They are "pure". Not pure as in better, it's just they are.
Let you try again? Bro, I don't think it's all about skin color. I'm saying it's a part of it and it's the truth. You wouldn't of "said what you said" because what you said was an argument to my analogy. Get it? I said obviously if it were the other way around because you were trying to argue that it wasn't, when I was talking hypothetically.
Well that's just you taking things the wrong way. And there goes the racist claims again.
Don't act like you know exactly what you're talking about with your whole "let me try again" attitude. You weren't clear on what you were trying to get across and that's the truth. Ever stop to think it's because you don't express your ideas very well? All you're doing is trying to prove me wrong in anything I'm trying to say even if it's a hypothetical statement because you do nothing but deny the truth.
I do have a good sense of our history, and Glenn Beck explains it correctly.
You tried to argue that my analogy was "wrong" and it's not ALL about skin color when I know it's not all about skin color. You took it from one level and brought it up a few trying to argue instead of admitting that color has a little bit to do with this presidency. THAT'S my point. And please don't take that as me being racist. People like you are fond of pulling that card and taking things the wrong way. And where do you get your history? From textbooks?
Okay, but I simply said it has SOMETHING to do with it. I didn't say that being a black president was everything. Glenn Beck explains things clearly. I don't see where you get off saying that he exaggerates his facts so much it doesn't represent the original idea. You must have an attention span of a 3 year old which it surely seems like by your misinterpretations. Unsympathetic? Hateful statements? What hateful statements!?
..college educated about history, that means you're right. History has been distorted for the longest time. Just because you went to college doesn't mean you know exactly what you're talking about which obviously you don't.
And sorry I don't feel sympathetic for people who take things the wrong way. That's like saying I should feel sympathetic for someone who thought the moon was cheese. They're just stupid.
I understand what you're saying. And no, I'm talking about economically history has been distorted to make it look like something it's not. And the argument is logical. I'm not saying the child is unintelligent. I'm saying it wouldn't make sense to have sympathy for him because he thought the moon was cheese. Sympathy isn't what you have for someone who took something a certain way. You can show them how you meant it yeah, but sympathy for them wouldn't make sense.
Economically, as in the economy. The "powers that be" have manipulated the economy for years. I mean come on. Do you really think these things just happen? And no... Sympathy for someone who gets offended by something that they took the wrong way, as you originally stated. Okay, lets just say MSNBC and FOX then. I can look up stuff about MSNBC and point out to you my accusations on that network. Okay, but you can also say it is true to like one anchor on a news station and
I figured I'd add that in there just in-case you weren't quite sure what I meant by economically :) You are right there, but powerful people affecting the economy doesn't mean that what happened was right or could of been easily prevented. History books don't tell you WHY and HOW the things that happened, happened. They tell you that they happened and they were affected and that's it. Banks, government, a lot of things. Instead of
The photos were obviously altered to make Steinberg and Reddicliffe "appear more Jewish." If you look at antisemitic cartoons and propaganda, they tend to have enlarged noses and dark circles around their eyes, and typically more "sinister." Then, Fox airs the openly altered photo of them as dogs, to camouflage the two altered "Jewish" photos before.
RipTheSystem33 1 week ago
Cenk. Keep telling it the way it is. I don't care if I can't pronounce your name right.
mukraker1 2 weeks ago
Wow, Fox. There really is no stopping you is there?
vonstev1668 2 weeks ago
I like it -- its funny
trust but verify
KNOWZ
Peace
SUPERKNOWZ 3 weeks ago
omg! is that what they really did! freakin' faux news!
Cinemaguy2007 1 month ago
ratings don't mean SHIT.
Croter8ment 1 month ago
wow i could do that in my photoshop class and i never pay attention
J1ZZHD 2 months ago
Funny how a single fox episode has more views then all of your videos combined.
Musicmaster182 2 months ago
@Musicmaster182 you're right, its funny. How can people not only spend their time, but voluntarily get brainwashed by Fox. mind baffling.
decemi 2 months ago 7
@Musicmaster182 So are Justin Beiber videos, but it doesnt make it right.
adamjonesboston 1 month ago
@Musicmaster182 The only reason that's true, is because this is America; where intelligence comes to die.
rbshow211 1 month ago
@Musicmaster182 Yup, that's how dumb American viewers are. Also the difference between a network television broadcaster and an online show. Congrats, you're a genius.
ianman6 1 month ago
LOL Fox kicks libturd MSM ass every day for over a decade. funny as hell.
usaeagle1776 2 months ago
i think the fat fuck still hate skateboarder
BADKID748 2 months ago
Progressives don't need any help they are negative, there fucking retarded, I didnt have to watch fox news to figure that out, fucking retard. Socialist scum bag.
TheDukeljk 2 months ago
@TheDukeljk "there fucking retarded." too bad it's "they're fucking retarded." retard
sbt200224 2 months ago
I wish someone would photoshop this fat slob's face from TheYoungJerks.
jtflush 2 months ago
TheYoungJerks: Fox destroys MSNBC ratings every week
jtflush 2 months ago
Looks legit.
fatansassy911 2 months ago
I wish TYT had competent and charismatic hosts.
JabberwockySupafly 4 months ago
hi
FreaksOnTheRun 4 months ago
Hahaha I always laugh when I hear the word photoshop
LegionIscariot 4 months ago
I am twenty years old and I can photoshop better than the piece of shit who edited those photos.
HyperTheProfessor 4 months ago
Click the transcript and look at 2:41 :p
ETSpacealien 4 months ago
Ron Reagan Raised Debt Ceiling 18 times/199% increase during his time as president!!!
OrganNLou 6 months ago
@RayTech70 ironic isn't it that it was the ConservaDrones who wanted to Literally Re-wright history books. Saying that america is a christian nation and all the founding fathers where Christian, all bull shit.
Didn't you get the memo?
It is well known that reality has a strong liberal bias.
TheShadowyPahria 6 months ago 2
I'd rather see photo shopped reporters than what the liberals give us: revisionist history... Liberats are just stupid people doing stupid things like this.
RayTech70 6 months ago
@RayTech70 My irony detector is going fucking crazy
uiruu 5 months ago
I see no difference between what Fox did and the screaming, ranting, gibberish that comes out of the mouths of liberals.
Only difference is that conservatives have what we call "sense of humor" and "thick skin."
Get over it, whiners. The left smears the right all the time and they just deal with it.
wulfmanUNCP 6 months ago
@wulfmanUNCP HAHA conservatives have thick skin? Blaming the media or their own ignorance is bread and butter Republican talking points, which you repeat.
khody 6 months ago 2
@khody Eh, if you say so, it must be true, right!
wulfmanUNCP 6 months ago
@wulfmanUNCP Republicans have forgotten what their political party means. If you can tell me the basic principles of what your own party represents I will humor you.
Mr91Nissan240sx 5 months ago
@Mr91Nissan240sx Firstly, I agree with you quite a bit.
Secondly, I neither require, nor desire, your humor. It changes nothing about the fact that while this is underhanded, at best, it highlights how Cenk here can't seem to get his hard-on down for FOX.
wulfmanUNCP 5 months ago
Fox would never do that - never ....LOL
silentfades 7 months ago
Fux News.
drrobertoboogie97 7 months ago
i know jack steinberg i now hat faux news
theunderdogsrock 7 months ago
faux has no counter argument for the attacks, so they just use Photoshop and laugh... pathetic
hawker445 7 months ago
Reagan is the one that started this, which is what's referred to as the "Body politic".
It was said that a member of white house staff once scoffed at a cbs news correspondent "the picture always overrides what you say".
As much as we know that the pictures are doctored now, the viewers who seen that piece probably don't. What Fox news does is try to build up negative stereotypes of progressives.
It's not funny when they have such a large talking piece and growing influence.
Seedofwinter 9 months ago 3
u can photoshop in vids i thought it was only pics
nawstra578 9 months ago
@nawstra578 You can't photoshop videos. What are you talking about?
CrackeTheSkull 9 months ago
@CrackeTheSkull you can, you just need to do it frame by frame and then put it back together. it would take a ridiculous amount of time but you can do it
lambofreak55 8 months ago 2
@lambofreak55 not to mention it would look like shit
xxxfealerxxx 7 months ago
media + celebs have their crews edit their pics all the time...its expected
vict0r1ous 10 months ago
@vict0r1ous dude. usually they photoshop to make them look BETTER...FOX did these photoshop'd pics to make them look WORSE, make them look evil by darkening the eyes. wake up man
axey111 10 months ago
@axey111 media has their crew edit their pics all the time, i never said anything about better or worse, wake up man, fucking idiot
vict0r1ous 10 months ago
@vict0r1ous i know u didn't say anything about making them better or worse, moron. thats why i commented about it. USUALLY when u photoshop something like celebs do..its to make them look BETTER. not to make them look WORSE so they seem more "evil" and to make a point. FOX deliberately made these guys look bad so their viewers would go ooo he looks evil so FOX must be right! pfff...that's what the fucking NAZIS! did to make jews look like scum in the 1930s - 1940's.
axey111 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@axey111 im not reading ur block of bullshit, media + celebs have their crews edit their pics all the time...its expected
vict0r1ous 10 months ago
Fox News viewers hate CNN viewers, CNN viewers hate FOX viewers. Both sides of viewers are fucking retarded propaganda dumpsters.
stfwho 11 months ago
Fux News. Should be on the comedy channel.
19996669991 11 months ago
@19996669991 maybe you should look into that a little more. cause abc news and comedy central are both owned by disney. so is msnbc.... and by extension. young turks.
guywithmac 10 months ago
@guywithmac msnbc is owned by nbc, which is/was owned by general electric, who also owns universal studios in hollywood. comcast is in the process of buying nbc from g.e. the last time i looked, neither g.e. or comcast are owned by disney. but then you've looked into it a little more so you think you know the facts...right?
in reality it's YOU who maybe should look into that a little more. it always amazes me how the self righteous, like you, are always the biggest fools!
wntoply6 10 months ago
@wntoply6 you do have a point, but that doesn't take the fact that fox news is just a slander corporation.
thejcjmguy 10 months ago
@thejcjmguy yes, i agree with you 100%. i hope you don't think i was standing up for fox in any way shape or manner. they are nothing but a slander factor.
i just wanted to comment on the fact that guywithmac is highly misinformed (regarding msnbc)...which probably comes from the fact he thinks fox is all knowing and all powerful.
wntoply6 10 months ago
@wntoply6 Yea I agree with you, I wish you could see what a real free press is like, like in the UK.
thejcjmguy 10 months ago
@thejcjmguy Free press in the UK............. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Absolutely hilarious...... Free press in the UK............. hahahahahahahahahahahahahha..... funniest thing I've ever heard :-)
MrTrotskysGhost 9 months ago
@MrTrotskysGhost I mean't 'freeer' thank America; yes I know Murdoch still controls basically everything here too - but at least we have left-wingers that are taken seriously and not just called 'communists' at every available opportunity.
thejcjmguy 9 months ago
Best quote I've heard in a long time,,,,"if you get in a fight with a pig, you both get dirty and the pig enjoys it."
e55amgkomp 11 months ago
wow, just wow...
SargentandGreenLeaf 1 year ago
gawd.... it was a joke peeps. lmfao
sapperzulu 1 year ago
fair and balanced
daniel104104104 1 year ago
They are such sleazy, disgusting, pathetic, lowlife dimwits.
The reason faux is number one is because everyone who hate them have to watch if they want to call them on their sleazy tactics.
Zentz29 1 year ago
You know, there's no real way of technically proving this unless you personally ask everybody who watches Fox News, but it'd be hilarious if it turned out that the only reason Fox had so many viewers was because the majority of them just wanted to watch so they could mock the shitty reporting and have a good laugh.
CerberusGX 1 year ago
@Nemesis000000
You mean the FIRST is so obvious! Especially the nose and teeth! Tho the witj hairline on the second photo, you can CLEARLY see the blur!
But you kno what's even *more* amazing? In addition to being SUPER obvious, it's also such a TERRIBLE 'shoop! I mean, you'd think an organization as big and rich as Fox News would have at least ONE person who can use Photoshop!
macgeek2004 1 year ago
The second one was too obvious... his nose was enormous
Nemesis000000 1 year ago
I like FoxNews
fbruvik 1 year ago
@fbruvik in Soviet Russia, FoxNews likes you.
ytfmichaelxu 1 year ago 15
@fbruvik cmon man
don222able 1 year ago 2
@fbruvik I mean it's like, come awn
OdinLowe 1 year ago 4
this guy constantly bitches about fox news playing dirty, and you know what, every single news station does it, its not news, its ratings. and if this asshole here were to really be against fox, then he wouldn't make fun of them either. he's just as guilty of this bullshit when he's making fun of people. I've seen him brutalize other people, not jstfox nes, he's as much of an asshole as anyone.
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 I'm sorry...um what...
zzman305 1 year ago
@zzman305 what...
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 the difference is this guy isn't claim to be the news.
systematic101 1 year ago
@systematic101 Hehe, well I watch both Fox and MSNBC for entertainment, everyone should know that Fox and MSNBC have maybe two hours of news and the rest is all commentary.
WickedCrazzzeee 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 wow... alright, go find some hard evidence of another news station creating as much propaganda as Fox and then chime back in alright? All the computer literate people who know how to use knowledge to their advantage branch out and reach people (the educated bunch who are the future of this country) and make videos like this, exposing liars for what they are.
SpencerMorganPhoto8 1 year ago
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 yeah, a bunch of muslims running a crack pot low budget "news" source, he's just as pathetic as any of them, msnbc, fox, cnn, this wanna be news anchor, its all apealing to what people WANT to hear, not what they need to hear. please don't say i lack the education, because i know you do because you actually believe there is a news source that is "hoorable, and has character" you're sadly full of shit, and if you think liberals are the educated... they can't even count to one
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 haha, there ya go again just spouting stuff off that either makes no sense or is just completely inviable. Regardless, yes i do believe there are media sources out there with character and (im guessing you meant) honor. Know why, cause ive lived all over this big ass planet and I have seen news from other countries, some in different languages that I understand, some in ones I dont. Get off your high horse of just talking shit about things that you know absolutely nothing about
SpencerMorganPhoto8 1 year ago
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 sorry, i didn't know this discussion encompassed the enitre world.... you kidding me, you are gonna play a game over semantics? just shut the fuck up dude, you're wrong. i was speaking about us in the USA, not all the way in the town of bumblefuck in Africa that uses smoke signals and speaks truth to its people. what did i say that made no sense or is inviable? please explain that as well.
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7
Yeah, Abc, Cbs, and Msnbc are biased but atleast they don't like and they are honest. They speak their opinions and don't use fake information to try to make a point.
FunGuyFilmz 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 well... and again... its cause you are talking about about smoke signals from africa as a source of news. You are talking out your ass, And just making up more racist shit. Go hate gays, praise O'reilly, and bash muslims on some fox news board. I dont think anyone here cares about bigot low-lifes like yourself.
SpencerMorganPhoto8 1 year ago
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 you are the one saying i lack intelligence when you clearly do not understand sarcasm. i know its not a source of news, it just went as a blow against your"i been all over the world and seen it all" comment. you're are taking everything literally and not seeing my clearly sarcastic argument with you because i clearly don't give a fuck. i recognize their clear bias, but why not attack msnbc for claiming to be the leader in plitics or cnn for being the worldwide leader?
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 well whatever works man. Clearly you havent learned in all the years of there being internet that sarcasm doesnt convey well in written form.
SpencerMorganPhoto8 1 year ago
@SpencerMorganPhoto8 its actually a literary tool.... so it works pretty well
KLsemperFi7 1 year ago
@KLsemperFi7 hold on... someone who is most likely a gay bashin/minority hating republican military fruit knows what literary tools are? this is amazing! <--- that was sarcasm, guess you're right.
SpencerMorganPhoto8 1 year ago 2
Americas credibility is going down the toilet everytime fox news broadcasts more incredibly offensive content.
PatTheRiot 1 year ago
Journalistic excellence? Not FAUX NEWS!
aguuled 1 year ago
FAUX NEWS folks sneeze whenever INTEGRITY walks into the room.
They have become masters at profiting from people's anger and ignorance.
aguuled 1 year ago
how sad,
crazyknight2008 1 year ago 2
I wish someone would put together all the clips from fox news and how they slant the news so horrendously, and make it a feature film. Because if you only watch a couple of youtube videos, then the effect of "fox news is honestly the worst excuse for a news organization imaginable" wears off in a day or so.
yootubematt 1 year ago
@yootubematt they have, it's called outfoxed
goonga1001 1 year ago
In case you don't care if you insult your audiences intellect, take people you want to drag in the dirt and make up false stories and have them look ugly on screen. Fortunately anyone can see this obvious retouche and recognise these childish fox tactics.
scientiavictoria 1 year ago
communist news network(cnn) sucks too
toothpik88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@toothpik88 how are you still alive if you're too stupid to breathe?
2edsajdmsa 1 year ago
@toothpik88 That's true but Fox is a lot worse.
KestrelVoron 1 year ago
LMAO THEY SUCK at photoshop! Even I could do better than that.
panther0567 1 year ago
free your mind from the false left right paradigm cnn is just as bad as fox is just as bad as msnbc they are all the same
bigjames168s 1 year ago
@bigjames168s No-one is as bad as FOX... no-one. This 'They're all as bad as each other' doesn't fly. I'm not saying other channels don't suck... but no-one sucks as much as FOX. FOX is in a league of their own when it comes to crass, politically motivated ignorance.
Keltibarian 1 year ago
@Keltibarian no, the other news channels just do a better job hiding their false bias. It is all show business CNN, Fox, MSNBC all have the same goal, the dumbing down of the masses to bring in a fascist state. It is all a game to them, it is not Fox v the rest, it is all media v the american citizens.
bigjames168s 1 year ago
@bigjames168s it's not false - it's a reality. Don't drag down real news stations with Faux News.
Marcara08 1 year ago
Reminds me of Nazi hate-propaganda
auntiesanity 1 year ago
@auntiesanity Nazi propaganda reminds me of Fox News.
EclecticSceptic 1 year ago
faux news is only about ratings they suck
SuperSoulsearching 1 year ago
msnbc is just as bad quit whining liberals
justen446 1 year ago
@justen446
no there not
Scarpsad 1 year ago
@Scarpsad yes they are i saw a video were it said that a man in arizona brought a gun with him to a town hall meeting that obama was at but they failed to mention the man was black
justen446 1 year ago
@justen446
Why is it important to make a point of the man being black, you can see he's black when you look at him with the gun straped around his shoulder, you can draw you're own conclusion and think for yourself on that one, you don't need Rachel Maddow to say "BLACK MAN GUUUUUUUNNNNN LOOOOOOK, BLACK MAN WITH GUN"
why do you care what race he is? he's got a gun at a town hall meeting where Obama is coming to that was the issue
Scarpsad 1 year ago
@Scarpsad no it only showed the gun strapped around his waist the reason that msnbc did that is because they wanted people to think he was a white tea party memeber going against obama and trying to point out arizona's open gun carry laws
justen446 1 year ago
@justen446
WHAT!!!! ok you know what never mind, there's nothing I can say that will find a middle ground with you
Scarpsad 1 year ago
@Scarpsad you know that msnbc is left wing all the way nobody can deny that just like fox is republican
justen446 1 year ago
FoxNews is pathetic.
LordProteus 1 year ago 85
@LordProteus Yes a pathetic tv channel for pathetic viewers.
paolo27th 1 year ago
@LordProteus Yes, but their viewers are far more pathetic.
jfrsnjhnsn 9 months ago
I wish we had TYT in Slovenia... Here the media is totally screwed up, but people are so apathic, they swallow just everything! Watch: "Gola resnica", a documentary on media in Slovenia!
akoolman1 1 year ago
Faux News
0SukMunky0 1 year ago 97
@0SukMunky0 You mean Faux NOISE
xxDanielTM93xx 7 months ago
Props to Fox. That was funny. I could tell from the get-go they were photo-shopped, and I think they thought it was obvious, as they continued to play on the joke as they photo-shopped the heads into another picture.
Though I must say, he is right in say they should have mention the pics were photo-shopped. I guess they just didn't figure on there being so many people who couldn't tell the difference.
derky101 1 year ago
Cox Spews
TRaddcliff 1 year ago
And last I checked, Fox never apologised either.
jackface0410 1 year ago
haha fox news is sad
gmartnz1994 1 year ago
All media is altered. Some may do it more than others, but if your gonna slam ONE SINGLE news network for altering their news, than you are in fact a hypocrite. If you want the real news, then go research it yourself. Don't rely on a God damn television screen to give you your news input.
DapperDup 1 year ago
@DapperDup
dismissing people as stupid is stupid. You are dismissed.
gratex 1 year ago
Fox's slogan should be: Fox News, always living up to the old proverb.
shugzbear 1 year ago 4
Fox News exhibits a Scientology-like paranoia.
ClumsyRoot 1 year ago
WOW.
Wow.
Every time I see something new from Faux News, it makes me more embarrassed to live in America. Dear god, they are pathetic.
iamericwhite 1 year ago
I imagine every time sensible ppl watch fox news they are just waiting for the lies and the false news they bring up as news
Adjei88 1 year ago
THE FOREHEAD!!!!!!!!!!
solidkundi 1 year ago
that nose is fucking HUUUUGGEEE!!!!!!
Erilis666 1 year ago
just the fact that he says a news person would make any where near a million dollars a year is rediculous. is that true? i assume it false obv, but ffs if that's true i'm about to be a news guy.
xxxdaedlusxxx 1 year ago
Thank God for FOX News. Did you ever watch those idiots at MSNBC?
tgerald 1 year ago
Oh my god. They want people to think the enemies of crazy people are automatically Emperor Palpatine.
meshumekha 1 year ago
shameless....even more so than usual I mean.
chubnostics 1 year ago
in england fox news is not even allowed 2 air...it chats that much shit(not that england is any better, at least the news is the news and not a comedy vhannel
pak10ucnttrust 1 year ago
WOW! and this is FOX NEWS! people actually believe them
GaryG1111 1 year ago
and this is.....interesting in some way how?
baronhomers 1 year ago
they made the first guy's nose WAY too big lol
spiderwebb33 2 years ago
these people look like the old depictions of Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930's
MrSpieldose 2 years ago
whomever would trust any of the mainstream media is an idiot.
MrSpieldose 2 years ago 4
as the rest of the world knows fox news is a joke and they lie and make up their own media stories who no1 takes seriously, apart from americans but no1 really gives 2 stuffs about fox news. what reallty amazes me though , that some people actually buy this fox news trash.. and the idiots that try and defend fox... they wouldnt know news if it bit them on the arse. . fox and friends .... your trash...
neozzyinu 2 years ago 10
Comment removed
cartier17 2 years ago 6
@cartier17
The thing is every news channel is biased. The only reason why I watch FOX is because of Glenn Beck. Yes, I said it. I like Glenn Beck. But THIS right here... wow. FOX did stoop pretty low. But you see it on both sides. MSNBC calls FOX racist, and FOX edits photos of peoples faces. It's everywhere. People need to think for themselves though.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Disagree with what? That every news channel is biased? Okay... SEVERAL are. You get my point. News channel are more than likely to be biased than not.
And I just said they stooped pretty low here. Whether or not they're gonna get prosecuted isn't in my hands. I'm not a prosecutor.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Yeah, I'm not. You obviously have a degree in telling people what terms are right and wrong for certain situations. They DID stoop low. I'm sorry to tell you, but "stooping low" means you go to great heights to discredit someone even if it means it'll also make you look bad. Do you want to try and correct me again?
They stooped low, and it IS disgusting. I'm agreeing with you.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Okay so now you resort to deciding who has high morals and who doesn't? Again, you're doing as much slandering as FOX news did in this video.
You pretty much just took my definition and put it in your own words. FOX stooped low, not the people they slandered, by editing their photos. The place where poor morals exist is their decision to edit the photos in the first place. Got it? And when did I write them off? I said they stooped low. That's writing them off?
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
My point is, MSNBC calls FOX racist, and FOX edits photos of people. Obviously the main objective for both news stations is to discredit something or someone. Between the two they're both childish.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
They aren't racist. You're ACCUSING them of being racist because of a few videos on the internet. They make it SEEM like they're racist. They say people think Obama is gonna turn this country around because he's black. That's not being racist, that's stating that the minority looks up to Obama because he's black. That's the TRUTH, that's not being racist. People can't stand the truth and in turn like their "politically correct" terms. People get offended too easily.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Basically what they mean is he's seen as a "turning point" in America's history because he's black which is true. That's not being racist. People have this misconception that that kind of stuff is racist which it isn't.
There's another one of Brian saying how in America we marry everybody. Is that a bad thing? I don't know, but I wouldn't call him racist. Now if he said white and blacks shouldn't be together because blacks are dirty, then yeah I could see how that would be racist.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
What I mean is the minority, which black people are a part of, are more likely to like Obama than not to. Just like if every president in history were black and then all of a sudden a white guy finally was made president. It would strike some kind of inspiration in a white person's heart.
Yeah that makes sense. But I don't think Brian meant it in a bad way. It's just like saying a dog is PURE bred. He didn't mean it in a condescending way. Like me. I'm not pure Italian. Only part.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Obviously I'm saying if it were the other way around.
It's only ignorant depending on the way you look at it. If you want to think it's ignorant, go ahead. He told the truth. They are "pure". Not pure as in better, it's just they are.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
That's why you said what? You tried saying that wasn't the case because blacks wer slaves, and I said if it was the other way around.
What's wrong? Mixing races? Or making it sound like it's wrong?
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Let you try again? Bro, I don't think it's all about skin color. I'm saying it's a part of it and it's the truth. You wouldn't of "said what you said" because what you said was an argument to my analogy. Get it? I said obviously if it were the other way around because you were trying to argue that it wasn't, when I was talking hypothetically.
Well that's just you taking things the wrong way. And there goes the racist claims again.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Don't act like you know exactly what you're talking about with your whole "let me try again" attitude. You weren't clear on what you were trying to get across and that's the truth. Ever stop to think it's because you don't express your ideas very well? All you're doing is trying to prove me wrong in anything I'm trying to say even if it's a hypothetical statement because you do nothing but deny the truth.
I do have a good sense of our history, and Glenn Beck explains it correctly.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
You on the other hand do nothing but play the racism card like a lot of people do and get offended by the truth.
And again with the childish "comebacks". Get some sense.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
You tried to argue that my analogy was "wrong" and it's not ALL about skin color when I know it's not all about skin color. You took it from one level and brought it up a few trying to argue instead of admitting that color has a little bit to do with this presidency. THAT'S my point. And please don't take that as me being racist. People like you are fond of pulling that card and taking things the wrong way. And where do you get your history? From textbooks?
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Okay, but I simply said it has SOMETHING to do with it. I didn't say that being a black president was everything. Glenn Beck explains things clearly. I don't see where you get off saying that he exaggerates his facts so much it doesn't represent the original idea. You must have an attention span of a 3 year old which it surely seems like by your misinterpretations. Unsympathetic? Hateful statements? What hateful statements!?
College educated? Oh so I guess since you're..
jmann114 1 year ago
..college educated about history, that means you're right. History has been distorted for the longest time. Just because you went to college doesn't mean you know exactly what you're talking about which obviously you don't.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
And sorry I don't feel sympathetic for people who take things the wrong way. That's like saying I should feel sympathetic for someone who thought the moon was cheese. They're just stupid.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
I understand what you're saying. And no, I'm talking about economically history has been distorted to make it look like something it's not. And the argument is logical. I'm not saying the child is unintelligent. I'm saying it wouldn't make sense to have sympathy for him because he thought the moon was cheese. Sympathy isn't what you have for someone who took something a certain way. You can show them how you meant it yeah, but sympathy for them wouldn't make sense.
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
Economically, as in the economy. The "powers that be" have manipulated the economy for years. I mean come on. Do you really think these things just happen? And no... Sympathy for someone who gets offended by something that they took the wrong way, as you originally stated. Okay, lets just say MSNBC and FOX then. I can look up stuff about MSNBC and point out to you my accusations on that network. Okay, but you can also say it is true to like one anchor on a news station and
jmann114 1 year ago
Comment removed
cartier17 1 year ago
@cartier17
I figured I'd add that in there just in-case you weren't quite sure what I meant by economically :) You are right there, but powerful people affecting the economy doesn't mean that what happened was right or could of been easily prevented. History books don't tell you WHY and HOW the things that happened, happened. They tell you that they happened and they were affected and that's it. Banks, government, a lot of things. Instead of
jmann114 1 year ago