Why do the PS3 fanboys always have to jump in on PC game videos? Not even the obnoxious 360 fanboys do this. Know your place. Sit down and shut the fuck up. Just because your console has Blu-Ray doesn't mean shit. Most gaming PCs have Blu-Ray drives. Big whoop. Don't even get us started with power and performance. Problem is most PS3 fanboys own a Macinshit.
@Chronolyse Wow...you're just all kinds of an obnoxious asshole. :D I've seen Pc fanboys (such as yourself) attack 360 and ps3 consoles alike. 360 fanboys have also been known to nag the same as ps3 and wii fanboys. And how the hell do you know most ps3 users own an apple computer? Proof? Or are you just pulling shit out of your ass? Sounds like you're a closet fanboy to me.
lmao sure old but it has nothing to do with your stupid moronic equation of processor speed, and furthermore I wasn't comparing the processor and i never mentioned 6-10 multipliers, in addition L however, seems you have a stick up your rear, and have issues being gay or a homophobe, get a life seroiusly
BTW Learn to do math, read and spell retard! then again it is amusing to see one with a stick up its rear and homophobic, very amusing how you pretend to know technology but just don't know squat stop pretending you look like an idiot, furthermore don't even bother commenting since your already the "laffing" stock of the homophobic parade!
Dude learn computer hardware before you call anyone faggot for knowledge, your worth less! Quad cores can be inefficient compared to dual core processors when those core are not utilized (dead weight) however each core operates at its designated frequency, also depending on multiplier, hence all 4 cores can and will operate at 2Ghz+, look into the core i7 (Intel Turbo Boost) which shuts cores down based on use application, and overclocks itself. Otherwise stay out of geeky comments "wannabe" lol
This game is fucked up. It only uses 1 core on your CPU. They tried to show off physx and failed you get nasty frame tears and everything. and im running a GTX 275, Q6600 overclock @ 3.15
Story is alright i guess havent beat it yet but the game play is just bleeeeehhhhh
to use physX you have to have a normal video card and a dedicated physx video card. =/ Go out and buy a cheap 8500gt and use that as a physx card. it would work. Just don't expect to use physx with one card
That's awesome... I knew there was a 3d water simulation being shown by Nvidia... But i never knew ir made it to be in-game. I've heard good things about cryostasis... I think I may buy it.
actually a good game is not all about graphics and how cool it looks.......if you get my point.....i'm not playing a game to see the water and details etc...i'm playing it for a reason...like action....fear maybe...entertainment.....the best game is the one that combines good graphics and a stunning story....
since this game is using Nvidia physX alot i recomend geting a Nvidia card if ur going for jsut this game, i myself ogt and ATI HD 3850x2 and it runs at like 20fps even if its low or high, but ive hard that thats optimization problems with the game and not hardware btu as mentioned its kinda mde for Nvidia card.
I've had Killzone 2 since it was released. I just played the demo of this game today. I truly think this game is better looking. The effects like snow and water and such are incredibly well done. I like the animations as well.
I wanna buy the game but I'm having probs with my PC running it. The demo won't start for some reason. Tried updating my Nvidia driver and it fooked up my computer... :(. Played teh demo on my bro's comp.
err this comment was in reply to katsaezzz. But I gotta add that of course it's an unfair comparison. PC vs PS3. Of course the PC is always gonna win :). Tho Killzone 2 does have some massive battles with tons of stuff going on. That on top of the nice graphics and no slowdown at all is pretty nice.
SPONSERT = the one pays more gets more - so if you look closely (what you cant, as showen here), you would have also seen, the Sapphire Logo in Vantage. And Sapphire = ATI only.
But its suprising, that someone that seems to map alot for games, dosent understand how a game Engine workes ........ but ok, knowlege seems to be nothing worth anymore today. just belive your stereotypes. You also belive creationism - I almost bet now lol.
Not everyone has a youtube account - and if you show it friends, that want to coment too, they have to sign up, or not? I would have used that way, my old clan account (not DS Clan).
And there we see it again, you have defently some complexes? I bet you also look for the bugy man under your bed, or however he is caled???
If you read my Coments: There were several proves.
But you simpely cant read, so end of that. Belive what you want, I dont care. Go on, only reading and understanding the parts you want, unless you read my comments full, there is no point for that here anymore.
And that you still take Vantage as "prove" showes how facinated and irritated you are from advertisement, and how less your knowlege is.
Vantage is sponsored by Graficcards Companys. Bell Ringing?? SPONSERT = the one pays more gets more
and if you could read, it would be easyer for all of us. But I know many people like you so:
Stay Noob - Or learn to think - If you want to say childish again, do so - I like to be arogant now and say: I know it better, and you can belive what advertisement tells you (special about 3D Mark in general, be happy with your penis mark, since its as far away from real games, as possible - but noobs dont know that too - lol)
nekronata, what is your problem? You appear to be a massive fanboy, as you're constantly criticising Nvidia when the truth is that both companies are roughly the same, in terms of speed and efficiency. Why don't you stop being a nasty piece of work and actually do a bit of research into PhysX? Nvidia's hardware is much faster, and as a result it is faster.
So you want to hear the truth? Would a fanboy buy for several 1000 € Hardware, from all companys across to test them out against each other, huh?
PhysX (original) = Diferent acitecture as a graficcard - is that soooooooooooooo hard to understand? Also PhysX was NEVER realy impementatet good in any game - sad but also true. THAT makes it basicly worthles, unless you can mod. THAT also makes nVidia look good, since no game realy used it. You got the same FPS by a better cpu. So go learn.
Physics computations are just a bunch of floating point operation that can be performed in parallel, just like graphical computations. Since a GPU is already outfitted to do a such thing, there is no reason to believe it would be slow at such an application, which is why nVidia decided to use their GPUs to perform these calculations. Obviously another, dedicated processor would be faster, but so would an additional graphics card, which would bring you more graphical performance as well.
OMG - Your realy taking the dick mark Vantage serius??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Once again: Get your deteils right - research for professional software, or stay a litle stupid emo noob - your choise
People like you, are the reason, I mostly mark noobs as noobs, and dont do a explanation - and your one of them, that cant read but trust advertisement like a religion.
Serius, more of you and the world will come to its end fast.
There is a lot of other Software using the PhysX and at them, you cant even get the nVidia PhysX to work.
The reason is simpel - the card has no PhysX at all. So nVidia would have the cpu to do everything (everything real physX is done by the cpu at nVidia PhysX - all left is just the PhysX Engine). But these highly optimiced Software, would show you - if they made there Drivers work there, that nVidia PhysX is just a joke and only the name - not more and less.
nVidia PhysX can be used with ATI too, with a simpel small driver mod. nVidia dosent have a singel special transistor for physX ...
And to the performence of the one and only PhysX, you should get also your facts right, but I know - I said something against nVidia and now your crying - go and cut yourself emo or get your facts right.
So sad to see bitter console fanboys pollute this video comment section. Their desperation of having inferior hardware makes them act like rabbid childs. This is about Cryostasis a PC game and the physics shown here are impossible to do on consoles why there is no game even attempting to do a fraction of this seen in Cryostasis.
Learn instead of acting like retards, you are shaming out the console community even more from it's already jaded and bad reputation.
Stupid fuck a 4870 costs only 180$. Go and play your shitty console with sub HD graphic and bad fraemarate. PS4 will just be 2 PS3 duct taped together as sony is dying.
Found this techforum. Confirmed it is just a relaunch of the old AGEIA physx software edition that already was availble for years to PS3 developers. Difference is that Nvidia bought up AGEIA and now is relaunching it. So it is all software driven and Cell is to weak to do anything special. Why unreal tournament 3 doesnt have special physics like PC version nor any other game on PS3 even does a fraction of Cryostasis
--h t t p : / / for u m . beyond3d. c o m / showthread.php ?t=52511
Actually NVIDIA recently released a developer kit for their PhysX physics technology for use on the PS3. As it's an exceptionally effiecent engine, PS3 could handle it fine with the right coding changes made for the Cell B.E.
No it cant. And physx has been avaialble for years on consoles. It is just the fact that a 8800gt is about 4-6x faster than cell even when doing graphic rendering.
Actually the 7900GT or 7900GTX clocks in at 2.8/3.2TFlops and 245/286GFlops for shaders. The x1900xt clocks in at 3.8TFlops and 458GFlops for shaders.
Thats for shaders, has nothing to do with the floating point performance of the whole system. Plus your figures are way off, by about .5-7 TFlops.
Fact is a PC is limited by their shitty processors, with the i7 not even being able to touch the Cell B.E. meaning that even though the PS3 GPU may not be brand new, it still could handle advanced games with the right programming.
Crysis on medium is far beyond any game on PS3 that has shitty year 2005 hardware. Crysis is only possible on PC becouse of more powerful CPU and GPU. That is why PC CPU are out-of-order type and way faster than the simple console CPU tech that is in-order type.
Found this techforum. Confirmed it is just a relaunch of the old AGEIA physx software edition that already was availble for years to PS3 developers. Difference is that Nvidia bought up AGEIA and now is relaunching it. So it is all software driven and Cell is to weak to do anything special. Why unreal tournament 3 doesnt have special physics like PC version nor any other game on PS3 even does a fraction of Cryostasis
--h t t p : / / for u m . beyond3d. c o m / showthread.php ?t=52511
That's because the devs cant be bothered to propersly encode the game for the Cell. And games like GTA4 suffer slowdown and graphic loading lag on the 360 due to the DVD drive, whereas the PS3 has none of that.
LAWL always teh same lame excuses fro mteh sony defence force LAWL. GTA4 on ps3 runs worse looks worse and aint even HD it is SD wit ha res of 1164 x 640 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Take yoru shitty consoel and arcade games and go back to your sdf cave troll. This is the pc section for real games and enxt-gen graphic aswel las nextgen gameplay.
2x 4870 graphic cards as can be seen in the ATI cinema 2.0 realtime demonstration of Ruby (cars, robot and chick), scorpion raytracing done with 8xSSAA at 1920x1080 resolution. It is measured that you would need 24-36x PS3 to do the same at 1280x720.
Becouse a single 4870 graphic card has 1200GFlops perfomance and PS3 just a puny peak of perfomance of 176GFlops for cell and RSX is worthless for this stuff.
Own console faggot. 2x 4870 is equal to 2400GFlops pure shader power and overal 34.5TFlops. Cell has measly 176Gflops that it cant even reach. And you only need a 200$ PC and then the 2x 4870 as they do all the work.
So sorry console fanboy, Sony is dying and SDF to. GAME OVER, K.O !
No wonder why a 400$ PC has massively superior framerate and visual quality in all games. Even stalker on medium graphic rapes KZ2 to death. And 360 is more powerfu lthan ps3, fact.
Yup, pretty much. Made just to show off what sort of elements the game *may* have, to tempt people to look in and follow up the game's release. A lot of game producers these days make these sort of demos for advertising and probably to test their systems against the game engine.
Crysis is so far beyond anyhting I really dont comapre anything to it since Crysis will automatically win by galaxy lengths. I even doubt next release opf consoles will ahve games that look like crysis.
hmm i should tell u THIS IS AN ADVENTURE GAME!!!! SHOW ME AN ADVENTRUE GAME WICH LOOKS LIKE THIS, and THEN i agree with u..this game is perfect and amazing, fuck the graphics (wich are quite good there) its a fucking adv game..
its amazing....just that, the water effects seem to be a little...buggy, like, its not moving the way its soposed to...yes i understand graphical limits, its just that water dosent glide when throughn off a table. but so far the best effort i have seen. good job guys :]
nah you better upgrade that piece of shit...Cryostasis will totally rape you on the framerates with that shitty system. Those system specs of yours are like over a year old. You'll need to update everything...
Someone mentioned getting a new computer alltogether, but you could still use your CPU, HDD and probably your RAM, too.
However, your motherboard is a bit bad. I'd say that, unless you wanna get a new computer, you should get a decent mobo with SLI (or even better: 3-way SLI) and get one more graphic card.
In case you buy a mobo with 3-way SLI you could buy a good graphic card (new 40nm cards in april) and use the one you have now for physics, and then get another new one later. ;)
On my PC, at 1440x900 resolution, everything on High and turned on, I average about 30 frames per second in this test (all done in real-time).
My PC isn't a beast, either. My specs are:
AMD 64-bit 4800+
2 GB RAM
8800 GTX
I'm Medium-end, if not lower going by today's standards. I still can't believe I can touch 30 FPS because this game just looks incredible. The water effects are easily the best I've ever seen in any game period.
eargasm
Lowrider1690 8 months ago 2
put this shit of water effects in crysis 2...
:D
capatais777 1 year ago
What are the system requirements for thsi?
LatestUFOSightings 1 year ago
I love that, 'PROBABLY A KAR98 OR MOSIN NAGANT'. Jesus, l2brain.
SirDamned 1 year ago
pretty nice. But the water is
gregor00005 1 year ago
Why do the PS3 fanboys always have to jump in on PC game videos? Not even the obnoxious 360 fanboys do this. Know your place. Sit down and shut the fuck up. Just because your console has Blu-Ray doesn't mean shit. Most gaming PCs have Blu-Ray drives. Big whoop. Don't even get us started with power and performance. Problem is most PS3 fanboys own a Macinshit.
Chronolyse 1 year ago 9
@Chronolyse you're an idiot but i still love you
tatoot 1 year ago
@Chronolyse Wow...you're just all kinds of an obnoxious asshole. :D I've seen Pc fanboys (such as yourself) attack 360 and ps3 consoles alike. 360 fanboys have also been known to nag the same as ps3 and wii fanboys. And how the hell do you know most ps3 users own an apple computer? Proof? Or are you just pulling shit out of your ass? Sounds like you're a closet fanboy to me.
Shinkatagi 8 months ago
@Chronolyse
Hey come on. I WAS FORCED to buy this mac for college :(
xalener 1 month ago
dude dude water effects are out of this planet
The4670 1 year ago
looks like Mosin Nagant or Kar98K.....but the water effects are fucking awesome!
iHardstyleZz 1 year ago
do you play the tech demo or watch it?
Illistical 1 year ago
Comment removed
MeisterQualle 1 year ago
Everything looks good and better. :3 I'm really liking those water physics, especially how they splash off of objects and simulated runoff.
FireLilyX 2 years ago
lmao sure old but it has nothing to do with your stupid moronic equation of processor speed, and furthermore I wasn't comparing the processor and i never mentioned 6-10 multipliers, in addition L however, seems you have a stick up your rear, and have issues being gay or a homophobe, get a life seroiusly
yahamilightkun 2 years ago
BTW Learn to do math, read and spell retard! then again it is amusing to see one with a stick up its rear and homophobic, very amusing how you pretend to know technology but just don't know squat stop pretending you look like an idiot, furthermore don't even bother commenting since your already the "laffing" stock of the homophobic parade!
yahamilightkun 2 years ago
Dude learn computer hardware before you call anyone faggot for knowledge, your worth less! Quad cores can be inefficient compared to dual core processors when those core are not utilized (dead weight) however each core operates at its designated frequency, also depending on multiplier, hence all 4 cores can and will operate at 2Ghz+, look into the core i7 (Intel Turbo Boost) which shuts cores down based on use application, and overclocks itself. Otherwise stay out of geeky comments "wannabe" lol
yahamilightkun 2 years ago 2
water's kinda crappy... it looks like jelly...and it's blue?! shouldn't it be transparent?!
but i'm not here to point the bad points only... the guys who made this game are absolutely fantastic, it's near reality!!!
congrats, guys!
fariassss 2 years ago 2
Suck my cock.
bluetoaster8822 2 years ago
nVidias PhysX sucks dicks, like you do ...
nVidiaFanboyrules 2 years ago
can it, nvidia cards are good... ati cards are good too.
they each have their pros and cons, so leave it at that and calm the fuck down.
bluetoaster8822 2 years ago 5
Супер заебательски!
ати shit
kudesnik1984 2 years ago
wtf you on about u brainless twat?
Kribby2k6 2 years ago
......Hi!
keringkein 2 years ago
this game is fucking SCARY! i don't recommend playing it at night with your headsets on while alone in the room!
enzo1st 2 years ago
Not impressed at all ....
xStealth 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
zomg cod5s graphics r so better this game looks gay compared to cod5
fljosh12 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
guys im making fun of all the cod newbs out there i was just kiddig
fljosh12 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nigga shit the fuck up if you havnt even played it.
ki11joy92 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stupid game!! what the fuck?xD
TychusCZ 2 years ago
.-.
Deremixproductions 2 years ago
wonder what that will look like on dx 11
shadebite 2 years ago 2
This game is fucked up. It only uses 1 core on your CPU. They tried to show off physx and failed you get nasty frame tears and everything. and im running a GTX 275, Q6600 overclock @ 3.15
Story is alright i guess havent beat it yet but the game play is just bleeeeehhhhh
adalstan 2 years ago 3
/Your Core 2 Quad only has 2 fucking cores.
xTOAxBLACKFIR3 2 years ago
If you don't have a second graphics card for PhysX, then don't use PhysX.
I have two 9800GX2s, and PhysX games only work well if I disable SLI and dedicate one of the cards to PhysX, then it runs a lot nicer.
I hate having to turn SLI on and off though, I'm considering buying an 8800GT just for PhysX, like others have done.
Story is seriously epic once you finish the game and work it all out though.
str1kerfswc 2 years ago
go out and get a EVGA x58 classified. Allows for Triple SLI, and has an extra slot for a dedicated PhysX card =D
TDVRecon 2 years ago
Dont play on full res then dude.
Im playing on hd4830 2gb of ram and 1.8 dual core and run perfectly on medium with 1280x768
samkirbhead 2 years ago
do you have another graphics card?
to use physX you have to have a normal video card and a dedicated physx video card. =/ Go out and buy a cheap 8500gt and use that as a physx card. it would work. Just don't expect to use physx with one card
TDVRecon 2 years ago
That's awesome... I knew there was a 3d water simulation being shown by Nvidia... But i never knew ir made it to be in-game. I've heard good things about cryostasis... I think I may buy it.
macca1088 2 years ago
he, wouldn't say no to get the computer they're using :P
Lolismad 2 years ago
Game's shit.
No wonder it cost me $30 retail.
Omniverse77 2 years ago
fuck you
fataxel 2 years ago
Cryostasis
Omniverse77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the water looks pretty fucking shit...
every game that is newer than a year looks better
DiebehaarteBeate 2 years ago
actually a good game is not all about graphics and how cool it looks.......if you get my point.....i'm not playing a game to see the water and details etc...i'm playing it for a reason...like action....fear maybe...entertainment.....the best game is the one that combines good graphics and a stunning story....
elvisunder 2 years ago 3
so true!
cod4playerps3 2 years ago
any chance ps3 can get this type of graphics?
monkey1o8 2 years ago
no, ps3 got dx9 (sort of)
unox234 2 years ago
can are dx get upgraped in updates?
monkey1o8 2 years ago
yea i think so, but the ps3 graphic card is too slow to handle those graphix :(
unox234 2 years ago
since this game is using Nvidia physX alot i recomend geting a Nvidia card if ur going for jsut this game, i myself ogt and ATI HD 3850x2 and it runs at like 20fps even if its low or high, but ive hard that thats optimization problems with the game and not hardware btu as mentioned its kinda mde for Nvidia card.
hdhg4ever 2 years ago
3850s are kind of getting old, and with a game like this, it's no suprise you have low FPS.
inquisitorjwp 2 years ago
yea but still its around 25fps on low and 15 on high, so I don't think that's the problem.
hdhg4ever 2 years ago
lol, i get the same fps on low as i get on max no AA no AF, ati 4650 around 25-35fps sometimes 15fps when the freeze effects comes
Lolismad 2 years ago
this i want have in Bioshock 2!
sTalk3er1 2 years ago 2
haha i had 1fps at hd quality with my geforce 440
fnatte0 2 years ago 2
this is the first game that fucking scares me
FreakyMUKUMUKU 2 years ago 3
holly crap
ramonetimao 2 years ago
wich has better graphics this or killzone 2?
katseazzz 2 years ago
I've had Killzone 2 since it was released. I just played the demo of this game today. I truly think this game is better looking. The effects like snow and water and such are incredibly well done. I like the animations as well.
I wanna buy the game but I'm having probs with my PC running it. The demo won't start for some reason. Tried updating my Nvidia driver and it fooked up my computer... :(. Played teh demo on my bro's comp.
handlas1 2 years ago
err this comment was in reply to katsaezzz. But I gotta add that of course it's an unfair comparison. PC vs PS3. Of course the PC is always gonna win :). Tho Killzone 2 does have some massive battles with tons of stuff going on. That on top of the nice graphics and no slowdown at all is pretty nice.
handlas1 2 years ago
that looks real pretty
DEMONOFMORROWIND 2 years ago
Its not a conversation - your are a joke - I hope you know the sited, where you post jerks and other people can lought? your one of them now lol
nekronata 2 years ago
SPONSERT = the one pays more gets more - so if you look closely (what you cant, as showen here), you would have also seen, the Sapphire Logo in Vantage. And Sapphire = ATI only.
But its suprising, that someone that seems to map alot for games, dosent understand how a game Engine workes ........ but ok, knowlege seems to be nothing worth anymore today. just belive your stereotypes. You also belive creationism - I almost bet now lol.
nekronata 2 years ago
Not everyone has a youtube account - and if you show it friends, that want to coment too, they have to sign up, or not? I would have used that way, my old clan account (not DS Clan).
And there we see it again, you have defently some complexes? I bet you also look for the bugy man under your bed, or however he is caled???
nekronata 2 years ago
Sad, that I have that to tell you as a nVidia Fan. But sadly he is right about that.
nVidiaFanboyrules 2 years ago 3
Your a total noob, the only one outdated is you
vitall66688 2 years ago
If you read my Coments: There were several proves.
But you simpely cant read, so end of that. Belive what you want, I dont care. Go on, only reading and understanding the parts you want, unless you read my comments full, there is no point for that here anymore.
And that you still take Vantage as "prove" showes how facinated and irritated you are from advertisement, and how less your knowlege is.
Vantage is sponsored by Graficcards Companys. Bell Ringing?? SPONSERT = the one pays more gets more
nekronata 2 years ago 13
Cellfactor on a old Dualcore CPU for example -
and if you could read, it would be easyer for all of us. But I know many people like you so:
Stay Noob - Or learn to think - If you want to say childish again, do so - I like to be arogant now and say: I know it better, and you can belive what advertisement tells you (special about 3D Mark in general, be happy with your penis mark, since its as far away from real games, as possible - but noobs dont know that too - lol)
nekronata 2 years ago 13
@nekronata stop crying because you can't afford good gear.
i5Alex 1 year ago
@i5Alex
lol, I have an ultra end system - so please try to learn to read, or do the world a favor and shut up ROFL
nekronata 1 year ago
what do u guys suggest for building a computer and yes i know it can be costly
brunzmeflugen 2 years ago
3kliksphilip is right, depends on what you want, but everything else is wrong.
For actual games: 4 GB min on a new System - for max. performence get 6 GB. As OS get Widnows 7 Beta / RC - depending on what is out on 64bit.
CPU:
non Overclocking:
AMD Phenom or Phenom II (best for the money)
Overclocking:
Intel Core2 Quad 6600 / 6700 - make sure to get the good Stepping and a good Motherboard then (Intel Chip, nVidias suck on Intel overclocking)
nekronata 2 years ago
nekronata, what is your problem? You appear to be a massive fanboy, as you're constantly criticising Nvidia when the truth is that both companies are roughly the same, in terms of speed and efficiency. Why don't you stop being a nasty piece of work and actually do a bit of research into PhysX? Nvidia's hardware is much faster, and as a result it is faster.
wesex 2 years ago 3
So you want to hear the truth? Would a fanboy buy for several 1000 € Hardware, from all companys across to test them out against each other, huh?
PhysX (original) = Diferent acitecture as a graficcard - is that soooooooooooooo hard to understand? Also PhysX was NEVER realy impementatet good in any game - sad but also true. THAT makes it basicly worthles, unless you can mod. THAT also makes nVidia look good, since no game realy used it. You got the same FPS by a better cpu. So go learn.
nekronata 2 years ago
For USA:
get nVidia (270 to 280)
For EU:
get ATI HD4830 to HD4850
reason: Diferent Prices in EU and USA.
nekronata 2 years ago
Physics computations are just a bunch of floating point operation that can be performed in parallel, just like graphical computations. Since a GPU is already outfitted to do a such thing, there is no reason to believe it would be slow at such an application, which is why nVidia decided to use their GPUs to perform these calculations. Obviously another, dedicated processor would be faster, but so would an additional graphics card, which would bring you more graphical performance as well.
rix0r222 2 years ago
OMG - Your realy taking the dick mark Vantage serius??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Once again: Get your deteils right - research for professional software, or stay a litle stupid emo noob - your choise
People like you, are the reason, I mostly mark noobs as noobs, and dont do a explanation - and your one of them, that cant read but trust advertisement like a religion.
Serius, more of you and the world will come to its end fast.
I bet you are from USA?
nekronata 2 years ago 8
Again:
Physic Cards need other Chips then Graficcrads have - Like CPU and Graficcard.
Try to let a Quadcore CPU to render a actual Game, you will get 2 things:
- almost no fps
- crapy effects too
AND the CPU has way more Transistors then the Graficcard, and a much higer clock too - still its way slower in grafics.
Original PhysX was a high optimiced Chip for Physics and AI.
Just because the games, that said they can use PhysX were more a joke to that card, it dosent mean anything.
nekronata 2 years ago 8
There is a lot of other Software using the PhysX and at them, you cant even get the nVidia PhysX to work.
The reason is simpel - the card has no PhysX at all. So nVidia would have the cpu to do everything (everything real physX is done by the cpu at nVidia PhysX - all left is just the PhysX Engine). But these highly optimiced Software, would show you - if they made there Drivers work there, that nVidia PhysX is just a joke and only the name - not more and less.
nekronata 2 years ago 8
omg, get your facts right:
nVidia PhysX can be used with ATI too, with a simpel small driver mod. nVidia dosent have a singel special transistor for physX ...
And to the performence of the one and only PhysX, you should get also your facts right, but I know - I said something against nVidia and now your crying - go and cut yourself emo or get your facts right.
nekronata 2 years ago 7
nVidia screwed over PhysX - nothing compared to the one and only real physX.
Screw nVidia
nekronata 2 years ago 6
Holly shit. I have Athlon 4800+, 2Gb ram, HD3870, and i play all-high settings.
Im lucky maybe.
But how is this? PhysX isnt a dx9 "plugin" cuz mirrors edge use PX too. :S Strange
yuhay 2 years ago
This games is awsome!!except for the hud is a bt strange
Bellink12 2 years ago
Holy, shit.
supernautK90 2 years ago
Isn't NVIDIA giving free PhysX SDK's to PS3 developers?
I would love to see these kind of physics brought to the PS3!
fcurimao 2 years ago
I suggest the OP bans Mazty88, Methyss for derailment with console garbage talk. And Tombes for childish behavior.
CobraStatix 2 years ago
Comment removed
Methyss 2 years ago
hahaha! atta boy.
zakfmt 2 years ago
So sad to see bitter console fanboys pollute this video comment section. Their desperation of having inferior hardware makes them act like rabbid childs. This is about Cryostasis a PC game and the physics shown here are impossible to do on consoles why there is no game even attempting to do a fraction of this seen in Cryostasis.
Learn instead of acting like retards, you are shaming out the console community even more from it's already jaded and bad reputation.
CobraStatix 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Until graphics of this power are cheap, there will be a PS4. No interested on paying 900$ for one graphics card
Methyss 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stupid fuck a 4870 costs only 180$. Go and play your shitty console with sub HD graphic and bad fraemarate. PS4 will just be 2 PS3 duct taped together as sony is dying.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Comment removed
Methyss 2 years ago
I got 2x gtx 280s and it didnt cost me that much... I could build a 9600gso sli system for 600bucks, and that would rape any consol 50 times over...
PS3 is suppose to have a 10 year lifespan before anything new comes out as well. So have fun playing on a consol my 3 year old laptop is better than.
bob333336 2 years ago 4
Found this techforum. Confirmed it is just a relaunch of the old AGEIA physx software edition that already was availble for years to PS3 developers. Difference is that Nvidia bought up AGEIA and now is relaunching it. So it is all software driven and Cell is to weak to do anything special. Why unreal tournament 3 doesnt have special physics like PC version nor any other game on PS3 even does a fraction of Cryostasis
--h t t p : / / for u m . beyond3d. c o m / showthread.php ?t=52511
Tombes123456 2 years ago
only possible on PC unless they want to remove 80% off al leffects for the cell and ps3 to not run this demo at 5fps.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually NVIDIA recently released a developer kit for their PhysX physics technology for use on the PS3. As it's an exceptionally effiecent engine, PS3 could handle it fine with the right coding changes made for the Cell B.E.
Mazty88 2 years ago
No it cant. And physx has been avaialble for years on consoles. It is just the fact that a 8800gt is about 4-6x faster than cell even when doing graphic rendering.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
--h t t p : / / w w w . nvidia.c o m /object/io_1237287245570.html
Look up your facts. The 880GT does not clock at 1.8TFlops, nor works at 210GFlops.
Mazty88 2 years ago
No the 8800GT clocks at 8.9tflops, and 587gflops for shaders.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Actually the 7900GT or 7900GTX clocks in at 2.8/3.2TFlops and 245/286GFlops for shaders. The x1900xt clocks in at 3.8TFlops and 458GFlops for shaders.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thats for shaders, has nothing to do with the floating point performance of the whole system. Plus your figures are way off, by about .5-7 TFlops.
Fact is a PC is limited by their shitty processors, with the i7 not even being able to touch the Cell B.E. meaning that even though the PS3 GPU may not be brand new, it still could handle advanced games with the right programming.
Mazty88 2 years ago
The i7 does 196GFlops the Q6600 does 96GFlops. And who cares since the physics is done on the GPU thats does 500-1200GFlops like the 8800GT-4870.
OWNED console fanboy!
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Crysis on medium is far beyond any game on PS3 that has shitty year 2005 hardware. Crysis is only possible on PC becouse of more powerful CPU and GPU. That is why PC CPU are out-of-order type and way faster than the simple console CPU tech that is in-order type.
Tombes123456 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
That's why the cell is then faster then the i7?
Mazty88 2 years ago
To bad it is not faster than a dual core e4320 budget cpu for games. OWNED!
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Found this techforum. Confirmed it is just a relaunch of the old AGEIA physx software edition that already was availble for years to PS3 developers. Difference is that Nvidia bought up AGEIA and now is relaunching it. So it is all software driven and Cell is to weak to do anything special. Why unreal tournament 3 doesnt have special physics like PC version nor any other game on PS3 even does a fraction of Cryostasis
--h t t p : / / for u m . beyond3d. c o m / showthread.php ?t=52511
Tombes123456 2 years ago
To bad cell and rsx are to weak to even match the 360. All multiplatform games look better or run better on the 360, owned.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's because the devs cant be bothered to propersly encode the game for the Cell. And games like GTA4 suffer slowdown and graphic loading lag on the 360 due to the DVD drive, whereas the PS3 has none of that.
Plus how is a tricore better than the Cell?
Mazty88 2 years ago
LAWL always teh same lame excuses fro mteh sony defence force LAWL. GTA4 on ps3 runs worse looks worse and aint even HD it is SD wit ha res of 1164 x 640 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At least I can see where I'm going.
And anyway, your big game Halo 3 isn't even HD, so you can go suck it.
And check out Rage by id. The 360 is coming to an end dipshit, 2 DVDs are headed your way.
Mazty88 2 years ago
I dont give a shit about 360. PC owns!
OWNED!
Tombes123456 2 years ago 2
And the 360 version is 1280 x 720 with 2xAA!
OWNED!
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Take yoru shitty consoel and arcade games and go back to your sdf cave troll. This is the pc section for real games and enxt-gen graphic aswel las nextgen gameplay.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And how much does it cost to make a PC that can raytrace at 4x ss in real time?
Shit loads. Yet the PS3 can for much, much less. Owned dipshit.
Well done for getting ripped off.
Mazty88 2 years ago
2x 4870 graphic cards as can be seen in the ATI cinema 2.0 realtime demonstration of Ruby (cars, robot and chick), scorpion raytracing done with 8xSSAA at 1920x1080 resolution. It is measured that you would need 24-36x PS3 to do the same at 1280x720.
Becouse a single 4870 graphic card has 1200GFlops perfomance and PS3 just a puny peak of perfomance of 176GFlops for cell and RSX is worthless for this stuff.
OWNED OWNED OWNED OWNED!
Once again it is PC that wins by lightyears!
Tombes123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A pc with just GPUS, yeah, because that'll work...
Mazty88 2 years ago
Own console faggot. 2x 4870 is equal to 2400GFlops pure shader power and overal 34.5TFlops. Cell has measly 176Gflops that it cant even reach. And you only need a 200$ PC and then the 2x 4870 as they do all the work.
So sorry console fanboy, Sony is dying and SDF to. GAME OVER, K.O !
No wonder why a 400$ PC has massively superior framerate and visual quality in all games. Even stalker on medium graphic rapes KZ2 to death. And 360 is more powerfu lthan ps3, fact.
GAME OVER K.O!
OWNED!
Tombes123456 2 years ago
Thats why no game on ps3 even comes close to looking as good as cryostasis or have a fraction of its physics.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
By tech demo, does that mean that you don't actually play it? Just watch it?
SavageMk2 2 years ago
Yup, pretty much. Made just to show off what sort of elements the game *may* have, to tempt people to look in and follow up the game's release. A lot of game producers these days make these sort of demos for advertising and probably to test their systems against the game engine.
Xithon 2 years ago
too sexy...
surfer199595 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
apparently u havent heard of crysis
Arkmenra1880 2 years ago
I came... best graphic ever
Tombes123456 2 years ago
apparantly u havent heard of Crysis
Arkmenra1880 2 years ago
Crysis is so far beyond anyhting I really dont comapre anything to it since Crysis will automatically win by galaxy lengths. I even doubt next release opf consoles will ahve games that look like crysis.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
then why the hell did u came?.... or is it Cummed?
Arkmenra1880 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tombes123456 2 years ago
becuz it still looks amazing stimpy.
Tombes123456 2 years ago
The water in this game = OIL
Not real
EndedWoW 2 years ago
hmm i should tell u THIS IS AN ADVENTURE GAME!!!! SHOW ME AN ADVENTRUE GAME WICH LOOKS LIKE THIS, and THEN i agree with u..this game is perfect and amazing, fuck the graphics (wich are quite good there) its a fucking adv game..
AR5T7 2 years ago
whoops wrong comment on there xD
AR5T7 2 years ago
its amazing....just that, the water effects seem to be a little...buggy, like, its not moving the way its soposed to...yes i understand graphical limits, its just that water dosent glide when throughn off a table. but so far the best effort i have seen. good job guys :]
chaoscivicDX100 2 years ago
Tried watching in HD...
got owned
BrutalGames 2 years ago
i shat pants
insaneangelstudio 2 years ago 2
HOLY shit that made me shit my pants we have a knew graphics winner here crisis step down bitch cryostasis take ur seat at the throne now
Xbuster231 2 years ago
yeah dude i totally fucking agree!!!!!!!!!
SANDIEGOCHARGERSRB 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my super uber elite computer play this game great. lol.
nubs.
dezontk 2 years ago
Proof?
Ginteru 2 years ago
Actually mate I was ripping the piss out of all the mongs who post their specs on here and say how they can play it. Retard!!
dezontk 2 years ago 3
I'm still asking you, where's the proof?
Ginteru 2 years ago
The proof that your socially inept and retarded? In these comments..
I said I was messing around. Fag!!
dezontk 2 years ago 2
I'm still waiting for proof!
Fag bitch!
Ginteru 2 years ago
They spent all their time on rendering, some of the models are horrible, you can almost count the polygons.
Rawr454 2 years ago
Rendering has a lot more impact on graphics, In both freeing up gpu cycles, While maintaining good, and sometimes better results.
scratchyrice 2 years ago
I run it at a reasonable FPS on high settings (average 48) with a 8800 gt OC, Amd 6400+
adequitprawn 2 years ago 2
requirements!!!
I have a amd 6000be,8800gtx 3gb ram pc 1066 I will get the phenom 2 940be in about a month
psp785 2 years ago
that water is gonna kill your pc :P
gekkjevel 3 years ago
looks amazing
forgottenon3 3 years ago
guys help i have good comp. (q6600 @ 3.0GHz, 4 GB Ram, 8800 ultra 768 ram, and Vista home)
and this tech demo goes fine for the first 10 sec and then it starts to slow down till it freezes... it freezes my whole computer. Why???
Chrisbxl1983 3 years ago
look at the water dripping down, that's the reaon. my buddy played this on his GTX 295 and it was still sluggish at parts.
dylanofwomen 2 years ago
my q6600 and 512 4870 play the game perfectly.
drazenmm 3 years ago
It`s not a Russian game - it`s Ukrainian
lamerbk 3 years ago
you are getting really boring its a Russian game and a Russian Studio makes it, they have theyr channel here on youtube 1CComp is the channel.
drazenmm 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The video isn't very smooth..
Arkaha 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OH SHI-
Alright, so the water physics are nice but its graph's look very ugly.
Galenskapt 3 years ago
That big guy at the beginning has back problems
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago 3
i am glad to see nvidia make developers do things exlusive for pc.i wish ati could do the same,in the end pc games is the winners
MetatroN197924 3 years ago 2
this game is so cool, the water effects are at least 3-rice better than crysis'
spidyp77 3 years ago 5
Crysis' water doesn't drip down that way. It just disappears on the ground
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago 3
the water in crysis only looks good. It doesnt interact with other objects. Its all triggered ripples and stuff.
leitegabriel 3 years ago 2
Intel Quad Core Q6600/2.4GHz
Asus P5QL
4GB DDR2 800 RAM
500G HDD
NV 9800GT 512M
Coolermaster Case w/500W
Will I be able to run well at max settings? and with what resolution/fps?
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago
no noob comp
vannet 3 years ago
No it's not
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago
its not a noob comp like he says, but you will need a far more powerful one to play games like this at decentframerates
pinkpuppyball 3 years ago
of course you will
spidyp77 3 years ago
nah you better upgrade that piece of shit...Cryostasis will totally rape you on the framerates with that shitty system. Those system specs of yours are like over a year old. You'll need to update everything...
StatD 3 years ago
You're retarded.
Stop posting.
And by the way, do everyone a favor and kill yourself.
Caleb1915 3 years ago
aaaaw QQ?
StatD 3 years ago
Shut the fuck up
holidayspecialoo 3 years ago
Someone mentioned getting a new computer alltogether, but you could still use your CPU, HDD and probably your RAM, too.
However, your motherboard is a bit bad. I'd say that, unless you wanna get a new computer, you should get a decent mobo with SLI (or even better: 3-way SLI) and get one more graphic card.
In case you buy a mobo with 3-way SLI you could buy a good graphic card (new 40nm cards in april) and use the one you have now for physics, and then get another new one later. ;)
nmrhm 3 years ago 2
jesus....will computers actually be able to run this game?
samredgear 3 years ago
On my PC, at 1440x900 resolution, everything on High and turned on, I average about 30 frames per second in this test (all done in real-time).
My PC isn't a beast, either. My specs are:
AMD 64-bit 4800+
2 GB RAM
8800 GTX
I'm Medium-end, if not lower going by today's standards. I still can't believe I can touch 30 FPS because this game just looks incredible. The water effects are easily the best I've ever seen in any game period.
Chubzdoomer 3 years ago
This game comes out on my B-day :D.
Can hardly wait!
AshHousewares445 3 years ago
"This, accompanied by a successful method of copy protection, could very well mean the return of PC gaming as the leading gaming platform.
Programmers, please! we beg! If I knew how I would hehe"
they already do have good copy proection in the form of steam. Stuff distributed on steam is very hard to pirate.
PolakoMafia 3 years ago
I love the looks of this tech demo....reminds me a lot of Bioshock, a darker, better looking Bioshock :D
SuzukiBoy69 3 years ago 3
and better physics cus bioshock had animated water, this one doesnt :P well atleast thats how I see it not sure
hollowinichigo 3 years ago