Religion is false for the reason all commericial things are: they are not purely devoted to the content but to their political agendas, etc. Now... spiritual truth goes back to a time when science and religion were seen as one and called mysticism, and you have actual contact with aliens/spirits I have seen them, not with any drugs but a spellcaster conjured them against me. This and the world is so evil I have no problem that Jesus is my only hope, we need to get rid of the bad apples.
HONESTY......thank you for sharing this vid and your opinions, but somewhere in the intepretation of truth? The physics displayed was rather lost in the mist of speculation.
If there are intelligent life in the universe then we are either lucky enough that they have not discovered a way to blow the universe apart or that they have all been able to know before hand that their experiment will blow it apart and therefore not carried out that experiment or went about it differently to avoid such a thing happening or that there is no such thing that exist that can do that. Or perhaps there is no Inteligent life out there except us.
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH
When are they ever ganna turn the LHC on?? I have hight hopes for it... I just know where ganna find out all kinds of stuff, it will be worth it in the end if we ever get the thing built and running,
Well aren't you special. I bet a lot of Kindergartens are trying to recruit you to tell stories just before napping time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Question WHO WAS in da bible King James.Does anybody think King James from da holy Bible(meaning BOOK) might have connection with William Shakespeare n possibly RE-written the Holy bible(BOOK). I found dis message while listening to K-Rino(Song:Surface Dwellers) and this video William Shakespeare in the Bible n da secret code of psalm : 46 SHAKESPEAR(46 words above from refuge-SPEAR, 46 words down from GOD SHAKE).
Oh and to the wise guy in the video.... Who put there space there for the big bang to happen? lol There has to be an always was or for there to be any beginning. lol Smart guy
@Joseph4675 It wasn't an who, idiot. Space as we know it didn't exist before the expansion. Get your facts straight before you try to criticize others.
@Joseph4675 hey wise guy, know what you're talking about before you make an ashat of yourself. the big bang created time and space. neither was there before it.
@Joseph4675 You obviously have not learned about the big bang in school. Were you sick that day? The Big Bang did not "bang" in some space, it CREATED time and space.
This is in response to people bashing religion. Yes I thing people have ruined a name for Christian believers... "Christian" meaning christ like. A beginning to a beginning. By mans own admission we realize there is a God. . My advice to people who are searching is to wake up and realize there is a creator. Those who stand around saying "I DONT KNOW" well thats just a cop out. From an intellectuals stand point there is no way around it. Get busy living or get busy dying. Life is short Christ evr
@Joseph4675 life IS short, so im not going to spend a second of it believing in some bronze age myths about a omniscient being made up in fairy tales. people who reject religion are the ones who can rationally think about it with an open mind. and see it for it's contradiction and fallacies..
I used to go with my college humanity proffessor to applebees and have drinks. He was a devout athiest. Understand this is coming from someone who went on a journey and found the "Truth".As I spoke with my professor he loved to debate Jesus Christ, Is there a God? Religion etc. Science is scary because given the right frame of mind anything can be debated or made sense of.
As we discussed on several different occasions "God" and religion, carbon dating all sorts of things that many believe debunk a God or Christ we found ourselves agreeing upon one thing. Science is beautiful and important to humanity, we both agreed. But one thing this scientific man, this incredibly smart professor couldnt give explanation to was a "Beginning". I simply asked him. "Mr. Phillips... If every beginning has an end, if for every action there must be a reaction"
• (Ex. If i were to take a fork and tap a set of wind chimes) Just from my action the result or (Reaction) if you will would be the chimes shaking wildly and emitting a sound..**Back to my original question** If for every beginning there is an end. If the big bang theory is true, if an explosion occurred in space and the solar systems and the universe formed and from that a special planet called earth evolved"
I asked my professor simply this.... What causes a beginning... The only answer was... That is Christian’s biggest and most powerful debating tool.. The thing I've found to be true is that for there to be a "Beginning" to a "Beginning" there must be an "Always was" or Omnipotence... I always knew it was A. or B. A. There was a God, a Messiah or B. An explosion happened in space and that how we evolved
• I think every human being must confess that for every action there is a reaction... The action or "God" if you will ... The alpha, the omega, the beginning and the end... Who was, who is, and is to come. Humans took that realization and acknowledged the fact that there is a God. Then created many different belief systems. (Ex. Muslim,Hindu,etc)... I personally believe in the Christ, The messiah... I believe he came and walked the earth and died for me.
• I searched and found him. When I asked him into my heart, my life changed.. My problems didn’t vanish but a power and happiness entered my heart that has been unfailing. I believe the bible is interpreted through eye witness accounts. Many things in revelation have already come to pass. I've have found that the bible has foretold much of what will happen to those who answer Gods call and how life on earth is to be for those following him.
• This is not a game. I think every man of every raising cand determine there is a "Messiah" and a "Creator". He created us and for that we praise him. You will be persecuted, pointed at, condemned, spit upon and cursed by those who worship things of the world. But I promise you the time is near. If you look at it from a biblical stand point, yes christ died only a few weeks ago
The only way the world is going to end is when the sun collapses and destroys the inner planets and if man does something to make a black hole or a destructive cosmic event on Earth.
Chuck Norris Rules!! Oh hang on the world ended... damn.. if the world ended a few days ago then does that mean I'm in heaven or hell.. I guess given my internet is still a sucky slow 4mbps I must be in hell. That sux..
ROFL what a bunch of arrogant assholes, how can a machine made by grown up monkeys that cannot even go into space without burning fossils destroy the immesurable vastness of space with its toys? someone explain me please how these morons manage to breath hahaha.
The word “apocalypse" means to unveil, not the end of the world. The meaning of the apocalypse is the opposite of what most people think. It does not mean the end of the world; it means the revealing of hidden secrets and the beginning of a heaven on earth. Search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the truth.
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
@tvswnet Though it's been up for quite a while, it's still a really educational video. I knew a lot of this stuff already, but i learned a few extra things from this. So it's not an entire waste of space.
this research will create particles strangelets these strangelets will create a unparalleled amount of gravitational energy sink to the centre of earth & start to digest the planet creating a "blackhole" the blackhole will then distablise the Earth triggering a number of sizemic events eg Japan quake notice whirlpools in the Sea after Tsumami off Japan evidence of magnetic disturbance beneath the Earths crust finally Earth inself will implode into this phenominum genesis is not for mankind
@BattousaiHBr, It was "impossible" years ago for a baby to be conceived not of the womb and now a woman can be impregnated out of test tubes. I even saw a news story where scientists have invented sperm. Looks like the obsoletion of man on the frontier. So I will answer my own question: It's NOT an impossibility that this collider CAN and IS causing more earthquakes as well as HAARP, that you mentioned. We need to be saved from ourselves.
It is impossible for a collision between two protons to cause an earthquake. Which is fortunate as cosmic ray collisions would have destroyed the long ago.
we humans stuff around with stuff ,way to beyound our true understanding..like oppenheimer and his toy"the atomic bomb" we think that we can control and harness everything and anything and weve only had advancements in what "we" call technology in just over the last 120 years.come on,who do we think we are! looks like big arrogance to me,a bit like when the wheel was first invented..they must have felt like gods!
Earthquakes are caused by the motion of the continental plates, which is why they occur in the margins where continental plates move against each other. Like in Japan.
This has been known for a long time now you know...
@ytmoog, Yes I do know about the plates, but that doesn't mean the collider isn't capable of maybe altering our magnetic field or sending out some sort of low frequency sound waves which are known to move objects. I'm not saying the collider causes all earthquakes, but I do think it's helping? things along.
WHAT IF: after this experiment stars and planets were created, life started to evolve on these planets, a day for us is a million years for them. They evolve to a point of space travel.
WHAT IF: we (our universe) are the experiment of some intelligent beings, maybe "GOD"????
@rawdenashitey Well that tought always came in my mind my friend. I always thinking like this for a long time, but I don't have the courage to tell it to anybody else, because I know there will be alot of people got angry with me
@rawdenashitey Your Hypothesis about god makes a lot of sense than the biblical explanation. When you say when we may be a experiment of god, it imply that god was not perfect. Thats why he had to reset the world by a flood, thats why he wants us to tweak our penises by circumcision. (post manufacturing adjustment). Also it explains why we have so much suffering on earth: our creator is an incompetent designer? . Lol.
@rawdenashitey Dont be a fool. you are jut looking for a reason to hang on to god. Because you were brain washed as a child to untill you cannot reject the God concept.
"I have no faith in scientist disproving gravity shielding when they have no understanding of what gravity really is." 1 of 2
1) Nobody said they disproved the entirety of gravitational shielding. I said the methodology used in the 1930-50s was disproved; that doesn't mean another approach can't give results. AND I TOLD YOU THAT. In science - real science, not the caricature you've built inside your mind - you can only prove that a methodology is wrong..
You're an eloquent and forceful speaker. Even poetic, at times. And you seem to make a good deal of sense. The last comment, in that light, was rather immature and unexpected. Being dismissive about religion is silly. For centuries, faith has held humanity together, much like your strong nuclear force. Additionally, religion and science are not necessarily at odds. You should read up a little about Buddhism.
@ytmoog Organized religion, I agree, has it's faults. It has led to divisiveness and bloodshed. But at the same time, I don't think religion is some archaic voodoo nonsense modern society must grow out of. Your words sting of a blind positivist notion of human progress that rejects any divergences from Western ways of 'scientific' thinking. Stop and think for a moment. Science has done as much damage to the world as religion has. Think atom bombs, environmental pillaging.
"Your words sting of a blind positivist notion of human progress that rejects any divergences from Western ways of 'scientific' thinking."
Do they?
I merely pointed out that despite your claim religion has don't nothing to hold humanity together but the exact opposite. Even today it is a great force for division.
@ytmoog a) Inter-religious conflict may have caused bloodshed, but I meant, in a more abstract sense, that religion (singular) as a force has helped human beings make sense of their reality and faith, broadly speaking has kept man sane. Perhaps I did not word it properly. I agree 'holding humanity together' doesn't quite cut it.
b) I merely carried your rejection of religion to its logical conclusion. Perhaps it was presumptious of me. What *do* you champion, then?
@m92singh The vast majority of atheists were once believers. Maybe they know organised religion TOO well. There was a recent study where atheists scored higher than believers when it came to the believers' OWN religion!
@philhellenes Entirely plausible, I was raised in a fundamentalist household, and became an atheist after reading the Bible. From start to finish, not just the fuzzy feel-good bits.
@philhellenes I don't disagree with anything science has come up with, But just wanted to point out that its not a battle between science and religion. Religion is for the mind and science is for matter, I love science my self, because its a wonderful quest which has been created for us to explore. Science says things exists but they can't say why they exist.
@philhellenes Being stuck in organized religion did not make them necessarily believers. It just made them cultural church goers - religious. That has no automatic bearance on them having communion with God in an intimate and personal level.
@philhellenes lol all atheists were once theists. in fact many people will argue there are no such thing as "true atheists." i believe there a handful, however imo 99% of self proclaimed atheists are agnostic theists. this a great video btw. i was describing quantum entanglement and the higgs boson to some friends and i came across this.
@philhellenes I think it says something fundamental about the different ways our minds operate. "True" believers seek contentment from security and social structure. I believe many of us find our way out of religion, not because of what we know, but because we actually SEEK answers.
@philhellenes I think that study reveals something fundamental about the differences between minds of theists and atheists. Theists seem more motivated by a need for personal contentment through security and social structure. Atheists seem more driven by a need for personal fulfillment through self-improvement tend to SEEK answers where theists merely assimilate the ones they're given. I can't help but feel like they're really only afraid to learn that they might be wrong. And nobody else cares
@philhellenes You are correct! Although, I'm not an atheist, I was one of those believers who came from a long line of ministers, preachers, and bishops. As a matter of fact, I was groomed to become a minister. My experience has taught me that religion is man-made. If there is a God, then He/She would have NOTHING to do with religion. I can debate with the best of religious people. However, I don't argue with fools, lest they pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.
@strjzkmnbf a slower collision wouldnt have as much of a to knock these particles apart into their sub level constituent parts; sub-atomic particle: proton . If u hit it hard/faster u break the protons into quarks,. faster and faster still and you get the smaller pieces flying off in the debris.
If u see a Higgs, the math says a force "x" affected minute point in space time; evidence, the mass remaining smooshed into tiny area with density = black hole tht disintrgrts w/antimatter immediatly
@m92singh "don't just discard "religion", people often avoid what they don't know."
well now i find it ironic since its the very oposite to what you said. when science (still) doesnt know something, people start atribuing religion to it.
@m92singh Religious knowledge results: #Average numbers of questions answered correctly out of 34; Atheist/Agnostic: 20.9 Jewish: 20.5 Mormon: 20.3 White evangelical protestant: 17.6 White Catholic: 16.0 White mainline protestant: 15.8 Nothing in particular: 15.2 Black protestant: 13.4 Hispanic Catholic: 11.6 *Study conducted in America
I believe religion is made up. all religion. But it has benefited mankind. Ofcours it has caused most wars but what if there were no religion. Life is so confusing, imagine just living, without any knowledge or faith of something greater. A life with only pain.. wheres the meaning. I think it would cause alot more wars and lack in general morality if there were no religion
We label everything that we don't know or understand 'God' because humans by nature are naive and scared.
Scientists who think we're a smart species on a universal scale are stupid, people who label which they don't understand because they're afraid are equally as such.
@userNameManh it's not dangerous... Do your research. And yes it has brought rsults, but thus far results we were already aware of. The experiment is a long one, and they wont be using the LHC at a level at which it can detect the likes of the huggs boson particle for some time yet.
ok philhellenes like all guy's blowing steam, and saying nothing, just reterick & psuedo technical terms, parrot fashion what you have read somewhere, ok lets see if you can get your head around this, does the same size of universe exist through a mirror, as represented on this side of the mirror, and what constitutes real inteligence? and the infinite problem of why men seem not to posses any?
Typical humans, we can only understand things by destroying things, smashing them to bits. Another approach is to use our brains to image a beautiful particle that creates a universe.
@JackeShan Funny, but no. I just think that science relies heavily on observation and must less on imagination. Do you think Einstein came up with his theory from observation? He used his imagination.
Once we come up with a good theory, we then need to prove it with experiment.
I don't think it's a bad thing to smash particles, but I do think money can be better spent.
@nikolayzou They've done the imagination bit, now it's time to check their supposition. Checking that what they've imagined actually corresponds to observable reality is a very important part of science, (and of imagining things in general); you wouldn't want to end up like Aristotle, who imagined a lot of things about the Universe, and was laughably wrong about most of them (he claimed that women have fewer teeth than men, for instance; was it that hard to COUNT?!?).
@StrikaAmaru If scientist want to find the secrets of dark energy, using the Hadron Collider is going to get them nowhere. They have already dismissed the idea of an aether, they really need to do more intelligent experiments rather than rely on the false assumptions of the Michelson-Morley experiment. They made a bad assumption about the aether and created an experiment that confirmed their bad assumption. The only good assumption was the possibility of an aether.
@nikolayzou Point out to me who said anything about the luminferous aether. No, really, do that. What does dark matter/energy have to do with the aether, and what does the LHC have to do with the Michelson-Morley experiment. Between something that splits subatomic particles to check quantum mechanic calculations, and something which checked for variations in light speed, and found none.
I'd like to know that from you, nikolayzou. I can't wait for your answer.
@StrikaAmaru Well the LHC is designed to find the true nature of the Universe, is that correct?
Well the true nature of the universe has everything to do with aether so they are related. What scientist call dark energy and dark matter, I call it the aether. Science have no idea how the aether behaves because they do no research in the area, it's to hard for them, better if it doesn't exist. Search for 'Rare Podkletnov Interview' on You Tube, most interesting. Talks a little about the aether.
@nikolayzou First off: Why would you rename it as aether? Aether already defines something else, even if that something doesn't exist; is there any reason for this renaming other than confusing people? Is it so hard to call it dark matter/energy? If it is, go the way of a certain comic and call it DaME. But don't call it aether.
@StrikaAmaru I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether. Scientist will not call it aether because they would look really stupid to call it something they had dismissed.
It is aether, just aether, not dark matter and not dark energy. The aether is just sub atomic matter that scientist simply don't understand. They already admit they have no idea what dark energy is, but are making the mistake that dark energy isn't that interesting.
@nikolayzou "I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether" 1 of 2
No, they are fundamentally different. Luminiferous aether was the proposed medium through which electromagnetic radiation was proposed to propagate; the Michelson-Morley experiment used interference to prove that light moves at a constant speed regardless of Earth's movement, which was a strong evidence that aether doesn't exist.
@nikolayzou "I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether" 2 of 2
Dark energy/matter are umbrella terms that describe the "missing mass/energy" (about 95% of the Universe) that cannot be observed electromagnetically, but which we can detect gravitationally. There are hypotheses proposed for it, and a portion of it might be neutrinos. Research is still ongoing. Which already contradicts you...
@nikolayzou I've watched the first part of the interview you recommended; I've read about his works sometime around 2002.
I'm not sure if you're aware, but gravity shielding and anti-gravity have been pursued since the 1930s and were completely discredited by the 1950s. That might not mean much, since EP uses entirely different methods and theoretical foundation. Still, so far it doesn't look good, and the fact that nobody else can replicate his results does NOT speak well for him.
@StrikaAmaru As far as I have research, his results have been reproduced by NASA for one. There is plenty of information about this topic.
I have no faith in scientist disproving gravity shielding when they have no understanding of what gravity really is.
Gravitons, give me a break, is that the best they can come up with. They even think dark matter are very small particles flying around and that they can build devices to detect them, good luck with that one.
"I have research, his results have been reproduced by NASA for one. There is plenty of information about this topic."
1) what I found out is that NOBODY reproduced his results.
2) I hope you realize that posting stuff on the Internet doesn't automatically make it valid. You can easily go to a biased or plain insane source, and get information claiming that aliens are stealing people's souls. Until NASA officially publishes results, the answer is NO.
@nikolayzou Secondly: "Science have no idea how the aether [DaME] behaves because they do no research in the area, it's to hard for them, better if it doesn't exist."
It never ceases to surprise me to what extent you conspiracy theorists misunderstand the scientific mindset. Scientists DO research the hard topics; that's what drives them. It goes beyond titles, and grants and Nobel prizes. It's a matter of all-consuming curiosity. Basically, if it exists, we want to know it.
@StrikaAmaru It would really nice if science was driven by a pure need of knowledge rather than a need to keep funding going. But I live in the real world and unfortunately a need to know only comes second.
I am also not interested in conspiracy theories, only conspiracy facts. Did you manage to look up the work on Gravity Modification by Dr. Eugene Podkletnov? That is really interesting and talks about the aether and zero point energy.
@nikolayzou Funny that you think scientists are unimaginative because they do experiment and observation. Yes experiment and observation is what dominates much of science today, but that doesn't mean scientists are unimaginative at all.
@nikolayzou This is an interesting variation on the Sky Fairy fantasy. It's still bullshit, though.
Why can't you people just leave this mystical bullcrap behind, and use your heads? There is no God (however you want to call him or dress him up), the Universe was not created ex nihilo, we don't know how the Universe came into existence but we're getting there.
oh im sure that particles hit each other naturally somewhere out there in the cosmos much faster than the lhc could ever do. We are still here, im not worried.
@Ear4Beauty I think the "how" will rule out some of the "whys". For instance; When you know you and your universe are made of atoms, and you know what atoms are and how and from what they form, and then you hear about a "god" that says it "supernaturally wished it all into being", ex nihilo, and you KNOW that not ONE atom has ever appeared ex nihilo, as if it WAS "supernaturally wished into being", then that SUGGESTS that supernatural gods are not the answer. Not proof, but an indicator.
@philhellenes supernatural has always been the term coined for something we can't explain. Something beyond our nature. If you took a plasma glass ball back into the 1500's, everyone would think you were a demon or a witch or something.
@philhellenes I am biased. I have already met Jesus and been convinced that His unseparable love gives great meaning to my life. I am biased because the Holy Spirit has given something to me which the world cannot give and cannot take away. By the way, some Quantum mechanics ethusiast want to use Quantum tunneling to preserve the argument that some particles pop into existence ex nihlo for a minute moment. They would probably object ot you discarding good atheist arguments.
QUANTUM TUNNELING: particles sometimes pass through barriers which should be impassable. This phenomenon has well-defined probabilities, and is caused by matter having the same particle-wave duality as light.
UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE, the: aka the Heisenberg principle, it states that you can't know both the momentum and the position of a particle. Has v long explanation.
VIRTUAL PAIR PRODUCTION: particles popping in and out of existence; main cause why nothing can reach absolute zero.
@Ear4Beauty: But why do we need a "why?" Are we that conceded that there must be a reason for our very existence? What if were just here because of natural events. Even if there is a "why," how can we automatically attribute it to a god? Why cant we just admit that we dont have the capabilities thus far? The universe is far larger and mysterious than we can imagine now, or maybe ever. Search in Google the Pale Blue Dot photo and try to convince yourself that a god created that dot for us.
@Ear4Beauty The universe often does things that don't have a "why", I think philosophically speaking, that's one of the most important things quantum mechanics has shown us.
@Ear4Beauty yes please DO throw your bible away. i think its totally acceptable to philosophy about our origins and why we're here, but its really stupid to believe God (if there is one or not no one knows) is the one portrayed in the Bible or any other stupid manmade religions. a guy that gets mad? has emotions? that created us from his very own image? lol dont make me laugh, if we're made out of his image than he already sucks, proving that he doesnt exist (the bible god) in the first place.
Yeah, (real)ly wrong. One generation smugly says their theory is absolutely correct and they gloat on about how smart they are. Then the next generation proves what fools the last age of scientists were and on and on it goes.
Sound like sensational advertising for something that costs billions and will give us even more questions to ponder requiring even more funding to solve, but if it does produce a black hole well that's gonna suck, and suck in even more money.
Apes are amazing.
ComedianFromNASA 3 weeks ago
Religion is false for the reason all commericial things are: they are not purely devoted to the content but to their political agendas, etc. Now... spiritual truth goes back to a time when science and religion were seen as one and called mysticism, and you have actual contact with aliens/spirits I have seen them, not with any drugs but a spellcaster conjured them against me. This and the world is so evil I have no problem that Jesus is my only hope, we need to get rid of the bad apples.
Phaedron777 3 months ago
it can only end in 1 of 2 ways.
1. it will do nothing and make duds most of the time
or
2. we will all explode in a hellish fireball of pure energy
my vots on #2. =\
kiwininja100 4 months ago
@kiwininja100 You're a fucking retard, and your opinion doesn't matter the slightest. Neither does mine, to be honest. Just my two cents.
MrCoolUS 4 months ago
@MrCoolUS yea so? anything could happen... well alsmost anything :\
kiwininja100 4 months ago
Damn it! Another end of the universe I waited for in vain. And I would really really be so glad to see it!
Never mind, try again! ;-)
kickniko 4 months ago
HONESTY......thank you for sharing this vid and your opinions, but somewhere in the intepretation of truth? The physics displayed was rather lost in the mist of speculation.
MorticeUK 4 months ago
Eh, stfu. You talk crap.
cooljr99 5 months ago
Boring
The09aking 6 months ago
@The09aking Yes, you are.
DoctorX101 5 months ago
If there are intelligent life in the universe then we are either lucky enough that they have not discovered a way to blow the universe apart or that they have all been able to know before hand that their experiment will blow it apart and therefore not carried out that experiment or went about it differently to avoid such a thing happening or that there is no such thing that exist that can do that. Or perhaps there is no Inteligent life out there except us.
ZeusHelios 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH
frenkyusuf 6 months ago
When are they ever ganna turn the LHC on?? I have hight hopes for it... I just know where ganna find out all kinds of stuff, it will be worth it in the end if we ever get the thing built and running,
jomill78 6 months ago
Well aren't you special. I bet a lot of Kindergartens are trying to recruit you to tell stories just before napping time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
atescoop 6 months ago in playlist Science Video's
the big bang is fake its a government conspiracy
mgrevich 7 months ago
@mgrevich : the cock in your rectum is not a conspiracy .. it's real
Sexxistentialist 6 months ago
Question WHO WAS in da bible King James.Does anybody think King James from da holy Bible(meaning BOOK) might have connection with William Shakespeare n possibly RE-written the Holy bible(BOOK). I found dis message while listening to K-Rino(Song:Surface Dwellers) and this video William Shakespeare in the Bible n da secret code of psalm : 46 SHAKESPEAR(46 words above from refuge-SPEAR, 46 words down from GOD SHAKE).
KSATica 7 months ago
Totally ripped off 2001 with that bone to machine shtick.
TheGutterMonkey 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMANITY'S FUTURE DOES NOT WANT THIS LHC TO BE OPERATIONAL.
news. com. au/technology/large-hadron-collider-is-being-sabotaged-from-the-future/story-e6frfro0-1225788270808
halcyon0830 7 months ago
watch?v=rk8Vr00EBHA&feature=relmfu
lazarusdie 7 months ago
Humans are evolving into a type 2 civilation thanks to the up rising in scientific advancments
kysmelmonge 7 months ago
Totally off topic, but this guy is cute
ToutCQJM 7 months ago in playlist A whole bunch of craziness
Oh and to the wise guy in the video.... Who put there space there for the big bang to happen? lol There has to be an always was or for there to be any beginning. lol Smart guy
Joseph4675 7 months ago
@Joseph4675 It wasn't an who, idiot. Space as we know it didn't exist before the expansion. Get your facts straight before you try to criticize others.
Manoichan 7 months ago
@Joseph4675 hey wise guy, know what you're talking about before you make an ashat of yourself. the big bang created time and space. neither was there before it.
ItsNotEvenSunny 7 months ago
@Joseph4675 You obviously have not learned about the big bang in school. Were you sick that day? The Big Bang did not "bang" in some space, it CREATED time and space.
hotkonto 2 months ago
This is in response to people bashing religion. Yes I thing people have ruined a name for Christian believers... "Christian" meaning christ like. A beginning to a beginning. By mans own admission we realize there is a God. . My advice to people who are searching is to wake up and realize there is a creator. Those who stand around saying "I DONT KNOW" well thats just a cop out. From an intellectuals stand point there is no way around it. Get busy living or get busy dying. Life is short Christ evr
Joseph4675 7 months ago
@Joseph4675 life IS short, so im not going to spend a second of it believing in some bronze age myths about a omniscient being made up in fairy tales. people who reject religion are the ones who can rationally think about it with an open mind. and see it for it's contradiction and fallacies..
ItsNotEvenSunny 7 months ago
I used to go with my college humanity proffessor to applebees and have drinks. He was a devout athiest. Understand this is coming from someone who went on a journey and found the "Truth".As I spoke with my professor he loved to debate Jesus Christ, Is there a God? Religion etc. Science is scary because given the right frame of mind anything can be debated or made sense of.
Joseph4675 7 months ago
As we discussed on several different occasions "God" and religion, carbon dating all sorts of things that many believe debunk a God or Christ we found ourselves agreeing upon one thing. Science is beautiful and important to humanity, we both agreed. But one thing this scientific man, this incredibly smart professor couldnt give explanation to was a "Beginning". I simply asked him. "Mr. Phillips... If every beginning has an end, if for every action there must be a reaction"
Joseph4675 7 months ago
• (Ex. If i were to take a fork and tap a set of wind chimes) Just from my action the result or (Reaction) if you will would be the chimes shaking wildly and emitting a sound..**Back to my original question** If for every beginning there is an end. If the big bang theory is true, if an explosion occurred in space and the solar systems and the universe formed and from that a special planet called earth evolved"
Joseph4675 7 months ago
I asked my professor simply this.... What causes a beginning... The only answer was... That is Christian’s biggest and most powerful debating tool.. The thing I've found to be true is that for there to be a "Beginning" to a "Beginning" there must be an "Always was" or Omnipotence... I always knew it was A. or B. A. There was a God, a Messiah or B. An explosion happened in space and that how we evolved
Joseph4675 7 months ago
• I think every human being must confess that for every action there is a reaction... The action or "God" if you will ... The alpha, the omega, the beginning and the end... Who was, who is, and is to come. Humans took that realization and acknowledged the fact that there is a God. Then created many different belief systems. (Ex. Muslim,Hindu,etc)... I personally believe in the Christ, The messiah... I believe he came and walked the earth and died for me.
Joseph4675 7 months ago
• I searched and found him. When I asked him into my heart, my life changed.. My problems didn’t vanish but a power and happiness entered my heart that has been unfailing. I believe the bible is interpreted through eye witness accounts. Many things in revelation have already come to pass. I've have found that the bible has foretold much of what will happen to those who answer Gods call and how life on earth is to be for those following him.
Joseph4675 7 months ago
• This is not a game. I think every man of every raising cand determine there is a "Messiah" and a "Creator". He created us and for that we praise him. You will be persecuted, pointed at, condemned, spit upon and cursed by those who worship things of the world. But I promise you the time is near. If you look at it from a biblical stand point, yes christ died only a few weeks ago
Joseph4675 7 months ago
@Joseph4675 Who are you talking to?!
libraryquiet 5 months ago
The only way the world is going to end is when the sun collapses and destroys the inner planets and if man does something to make a black hole or a destructive cosmic event on Earth.
curiouscrab224 7 months ago
Chuck Norris Rules!! Oh hang on the world ended... damn.. if the world ended a few days ago then does that mean I'm in heaven or hell.. I guess given my internet is still a sucky slow 4mbps I must be in hell. That sux..
andrewbodger 7 months ago
This guy is cool man, agree totally on the religious comment, and am a lot less fissiparous on the whole LHC tests.
jakalope72 7 months ago
I agree with you, all religion is, is a boogie man used to scare naughty children.
mjmoore792 7 months ago
loved ur ending lol shakespeare quote haha i should try tht in my english class lol
JKTProductionzIncNCo 8 months ago
hey im a atheist but i don't smash on religions unless there doing something that directly affects a law or my life and i don't see why you do.
cooljacob204 8 months ago
ROFL what a bunch of arrogant assholes, how can a machine made by grown up monkeys that cannot even go into space without burning fossils destroy the immesurable vastness of space with its toys? someone explain me please how these morons manage to breath hahaha.
eltuzo466 8 months ago
@eltuzo466 Are you really that stupid?! It's time for your banana. Dry up and go away!
libraryquiet 5 months ago
what would happen if you smash chuck norris with the dos equis most interesting man in the world inside of the LHC?
nebakanez 8 months ago
what happens if u smash 2 Higgs together?
eastcoaster54 8 months ago
kill civilised scum!
elisei00 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The word “apocalypse" means to unveil, not the end of the world. The meaning of the apocalypse is the opposite of what most people think. It does not mean the end of the world; it means the revealing of hidden secrets and the beginning of a heaven on earth. Search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the truth.
vividDC 8 months ago
Comment removed
boomholdbear 9 months ago
Comment removed
boomholdbear 9 months ago
Tater likes the way he says "down to the nucleus" like Tater says "down to the hardware store"
TaterGumfries 9 months ago
thanks for your co oparition,, MUHAMMED IMAM EL MEHDI...
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
muhammed imam el mehdi
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
Well this guy is full of sh*t. He needs to be a stand up. LOL
tallfaas 9 months ago
Well this guy was full of sh*t. He should be a stand up. LOL
tallfaas 9 months ago
oh ok mr scientist i believe you!, ass
y0utUBeH8r 9 months ago
Thumbs up who fancies a mint chocolate cornetto.
fraybentos666 9 months ago
Thumbs up if you thought the thumbnail was the opening from The Big Bang Theory
TosiValhe 9 months ago
Wow, this video is still up, even though the LHC has been in operation for quite some time?
tvswnet 9 months ago 25
@tvswnet Though it's been up for quite a while, it's still a really educational video. I knew a lot of this stuff already, but i learned a few extra things from this. So it's not an entire waste of space.
TheRaelykSky 8 months ago
@tvswnet yes it will always be on the internet.
ttopperr 6 months ago
this research will create particles strangelets these strangelets will create a unparalleled amount of gravitational energy sink to the centre of earth & start to digest the planet creating a "blackhole" the blackhole will then distablise the Earth triggering a number of sizemic events eg Japan quake notice whirlpools in the Sea after Tsumami off Japan evidence of magnetic disturbance beneath the Earths crust finally Earth inself will implode into this phenominum genesis is not for mankind
suparocstar 9 months ago
@suparocstar
Your mixing your doomsday hypotheses.
The mini black holes are the ones which create the imploding earth, the strangelets will turn the planet into strange matter...
Of course neither exist, sadly the same cannot be said for those peddling this crap.
ytmoog 9 months ago
When was the last run of this collider that "they" actually told us about? And could this have anything to do with the frequency of our earthquakes?
lowriderbandfan 9 months ago
@lowriderbandfan its impossible for the LHC to generate earthquakes. just like its impossible for the HAARP to do so too.
its like your girlfriend asking if its possible to get pregnant if she swallows it.
BattousaiHBr 9 months ago
@BattousaiHBr, It was "impossible" years ago for a baby to be conceived not of the womb and now a woman can be impregnated out of test tubes. I even saw a news story where scientists have invented sperm. Looks like the obsoletion of man on the frontier. So I will answer my own question: It's NOT an impossibility that this collider CAN and IS causing more earthquakes as well as HAARP, that you mentioned. We need to be saved from ourselves.
lowriderbandfan 9 months ago
@lowriderbandfan
It is impossible for a collision between two protons to cause an earthquake. Which is fortunate as cosmic ray collisions would have destroyed the long ago.
"HAARP"
That's a giggle :)
ytmoog 9 months ago
@lowriderbandfan i recon too man..
we humans stuff around with stuff ,way to beyound our true understanding..like oppenheimer and his toy"the atomic bomb" we think that we can control and harness everything and anything and weve only had advancements in what "we" call technology in just over the last 120 years.come on,who do we think we are! looks like big arrogance to me,a bit like when the wheel was first invented..they must have felt like gods!
i believe we are a speck in scheme of things
weldon0m 9 months ago
@lowriderbandfan
Earthquakes are caused by the motion of the continental plates, which is why they occur in the margins where continental plates move against each other. Like in Japan.
This has been known for a long time now you know...
ytmoog 9 months ago
@ytmoog, Yes I do know about the plates, but that doesn't mean the collider isn't capable of maybe altering our magnetic field or sending out some sort of low frequency sound waves which are known to move objects. I'm not saying the collider causes all earthquakes, but I do think it's helping? things along.
lowriderbandfan 9 months ago
@lowriderbandfan
How would it effect our magnetic field?
Why would it create low frequency sound?
Why would crashing two protons together affect continental plates?... and more interestingly why would cosmic ray collisions not?
Making up imaginary chains of effects; while no doubt fun, does not make it so.
ytmoog 9 months ago
Nice little stab at religion there at at the end... You atheists just cant shut your fucking mouths can you? Fucking Twat!
Kritter2490 10 months ago
GOD EXIST...FUC
TheFlamingFrost1 10 months ago
hÎ_ï_fÈêl_sÔ_lÓNËly_tÔdÄý
BabeioAlexiaaa684 10 months ago
no. period!
atmark666 10 months ago
I thought the big bang was not a bang but more like an expension?
Singerjoy 10 months ago
@Singerjoy Don't explosions make big "bang" sounds?
Kritter2490 10 months ago
So in other words, if you don't want to weigh as much as a galaxy, stop putting cake into the black hole under your nose.
ebutemetube 10 months ago
LOL @ "Hopelessly out of scale" as if you could scale a Nucleus or electron In reference to anything at all, even its self.
Sperain 10 months ago
WHAT IF: after this experiment stars and planets were created, life started to evolve on these planets, a day for us is a million years for them. They evolve to a point of space travel.
WHAT IF: we (our universe) are the experiment of some intelligent beings, maybe "GOD"????
rawdenashitey 11 months ago
@rawdenashitey Well that tought always came in my mind my friend. I always thinking like this for a long time, but I don't have the courage to tell it to anybody else, because I know there will be alot of people got angry with me
ismoyont 10 months ago
@rawdenashitey Your Hypothesis about god makes a lot of sense than the biblical explanation. When you say when we may be a experiment of god, it imply that god was not perfect. Thats why he had to reset the world by a flood, thats why he wants us to tweak our penises by circumcision. (post manufacturing adjustment). Also it explains why we have so much suffering on earth: our creator is an incompetent designer? . Lol.
samarasinghenalin 10 months ago
@samarasinghenalin exactly lol
rawdenashitey 10 months ago
@rawdenashitey Dont be a fool. you are jut looking for a reason to hang on to god. Because you were brain washed as a child to untill you cannot reject the God concept.
samarasinghenalin 10 months ago
@rawdenashitey Are you an agnostic? I have had that exact same thought occur to me as well.
DeathBYDesign666 10 months ago
Tremendously interesting until that silly bit at the end.
baldrbraa 11 months ago
Well done.
MichaelFrostChicago 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAH
pudinggala 11 months ago
I still havn't felt anything..... Superflous waste of video space! Simple conjecture from a ponce!
Flayprime 11 months ago
Shit, I thought It didn't go live yet. Is true! You don't feel a crap. FUCK'EM!
Stover36 11 months ago
As noble as the intentions of this video may be..... saying "you won't feel a thing" is creepy as fuck.
JeffLongoria 11 months ago
@nikolayzou
"I have no faith in scientist disproving gravity shielding when they have no understanding of what gravity really is." 1 of 2
1) Nobody said they disproved the entirety of gravitational shielding. I said the methodology used in the 1930-50s was disproved; that doesn't mean another approach can't give results. AND I TOLD YOU THAT. In science - real science, not the caricature you've built inside your mind - you can only prove that a methodology is wrong..
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
Comment removed
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
You're an eloquent and forceful speaker. Even poetic, at times. And you seem to make a good deal of sense. The last comment, in that light, was rather immature and unexpected. Being dismissive about religion is silly. For centuries, faith has held humanity together, much like your strong nuclear force. Additionally, religion and science are not necessarily at odds. You should read up a little about Buddhism.
PrayagRay 11 months ago
@PrayagRay YOU should read up a little about Buddhist extremism ;)
PathToVendetta 11 months ago
@PrayagRay
"For centuries, faith has held humanity together"
As Catholics and Protestants would know... when they weren't burning each other alive.
ytmoog 11 months ago
@ytmoog Organized religion, I agree, has it's faults. It has led to divisiveness and bloodshed. But at the same time, I don't think religion is some archaic voodoo nonsense modern society must grow out of. Your words sting of a blind positivist notion of human progress that rejects any divergences from Western ways of 'scientific' thinking. Stop and think for a moment. Science has done as much damage to the world as religion has. Think atom bombs, environmental pillaging.
PrayagRay 11 months ago
@PrayagRay
"Your words sting of a blind positivist notion of human progress that rejects any divergences from Western ways of 'scientific' thinking."
Do they?
I merely pointed out that despite your claim religion has don't nothing to hold humanity together but the exact opposite. Even today it is a great force for division.
I mentioned nothing else in my post.
ytmoog 11 months ago
@ytmoog a) Inter-religious conflict may have caused bloodshed, but I meant, in a more abstract sense, that religion (singular) as a force has helped human beings make sense of their reality and faith, broadly speaking has kept man sane. Perhaps I did not word it properly. I agree 'holding humanity together' doesn't quite cut it.
b) I merely carried your rejection of religion to its logical conclusion. Perhaps it was presumptious of me. What *do* you champion, then?
PrayagRay 11 months ago
"Inter-religious conflict may have caused bloodshed"
Why the 'may'? Go look up some history.
"I merely carried your rejection of religion to its logical conclusion."
No you didn't.
You created a nice straw man to beat.
"What *do* you champion, then?"
Excellent question.
Many things I guess, at the moment better education and medical care in certain countries.
That is what I am 'championing' at the moment.
ytmoog 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
science is a tool.. its not the answer to everything..don't just discard "religion", people often avoid what they don't know.
m92singh 11 months ago
@m92singh The vast majority of atheists were once believers. Maybe they know organised religion TOO well. There was a recent study where atheists scored higher than believers when it came to the believers' OWN religion!
philhellenes 11 months ago 53
@philhellenes Entirely plausible, I was raised in a fundamentalist household, and became an atheist after reading the Bible. From start to finish, not just the fuzzy feel-good bits.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@philhellenes I don't disagree with anything science has come up with, But just wanted to point out that its not a battle between science and religion. Religion is for the mind and science is for matter, I love science my self, because its a wonderful quest which has been created for us to explore. Science says things exists but they can't say why they exist.
m92singh 11 months ago
@philhellenes Being stuck in organized religion did not make them necessarily believers. It just made them cultural church goers - religious. That has no automatic bearance on them having communion with God in an intimate and personal level.
Ear4Beauty 11 months ago
@philhellenes lol all atheists were once theists. in fact many people will argue there are no such thing as "true atheists." i believe there a handful, however imo 99% of self proclaimed atheists are agnostic theists. this a great video btw. i was describing quantum entanglement and the higgs boson to some friends and i came across this.
somestupiddude1234 11 months ago
@philhellenes I think it says something fundamental about the different ways our minds operate. "True" believers seek contentment from security and social structure. I believe many of us find our way out of religion, not because of what we know, but because we actually SEEK answers.
Jeddie256 11 months ago
@philhellenes I think that study reveals something fundamental about the differences between minds of theists and atheists. Theists seem more motivated by a need for personal contentment through security and social structure. Atheists seem more driven by a need for personal fulfillment through self-improvement tend to SEEK answers where theists merely assimilate the ones they're given. I can't help but feel like they're really only afraid to learn that they might be wrong. And nobody else cares
Jeddie256 11 months ago
@philhellenes You are correct! Although, I'm not an atheist, I was one of those believers who came from a long line of ministers, preachers, and bishops. As a matter of fact, I was groomed to become a minister. My experience has taught me that religion is man-made. If there is a God, then He/She would have NOTHING to do with religion. I can debate with the best of religious people. However, I don't argue with fools, lest they pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.
jibaritobueno 11 months ago
@philhellenes Wow, that's some real huge kind of bullshit.
urukang 9 months ago
@urukang you are talking about yourself? ..
hansbo11 9 months ago
@philhellenes
One might ask:"Why does the LHC needs such speeds"
------------------
Because the faster things move, the slower time goes by.
We would not be able to detect those particles
because they would not exist long enough for beeing detected.
In fact:
The LHC, is a timemachine.
------------------
Isn't THAT beautiful?
strjzkmnbf 8 months ago
@strjzkmnbf a slower collision wouldnt have as much of a to knock these particles apart into their sub level constituent parts; sub-atomic particle: proton . If u hit it hard/faster u break the protons into quarks,. faster and faster still and you get the smaller pieces flying off in the debris.
If u see a Higgs, the math says a force "x" affected minute point in space time; evidence, the mass remaining smooshed into tiny area with density = black hole tht disintrgrts w/antimatter immediatly
eastcoaster54 8 months ago
@eastcoaster54
"the mass remaining smooshed into tiny area with density = black hole tht disintrgrts w/antimatter immediatly"
----------------
If so "immediatly" it would not make much sense to look for it, would it?
With the rest i do agree.
Besides, i am not sure if we really need ~99.99% of c JUST to smash them apart.
+ The faster things move, the heavier they get...it seems.
strjzkmnbf 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@m92singh "don't just discard "religion", people often avoid what they don't know."
well now i find it ironic since its the very oposite to what you said. when science (still) doesnt know something, people start atribuing religion to it.
BattousaiHBr 9 months ago
@m92singh my freind you are stupid, good night!
ILoveBarcaNumberOne 9 months ago
noaccount4 8 months ago
@m92singh science may not be the answer to everything, but religion is the answer to nothing, except how to control an uneducated populace
TheHomelessCripple 8 months ago 45
@TheHomelessCripple
I believe religion is made up. all religion. But it has benefited mankind. Ofcours it has caused most wars but what if there were no religion. Life is so confusing, imagine just living, without any knowledge or faith of something greater. A life with only pain.. wheres the meaning. I think it would cause alot more wars and lack in general morality if there were no religion
netbetset 1 month ago
We label everything that we don't know or understand 'God' because humans by nature are naive and scared.
Scientists who think we're a smart species on a universal scale are stupid, people who label which they don't understand because they're afraid are equally as such.
M7ACCA 11 months ago
*higgs boson... Haha, like the idea of a huggs boson though, a big cuddly origin of mass :-)
rubberglover 1 year ago
@userNameManh it's not dangerous... Do your research. And yes it has brought rsults, but thus far results we were already aware of. The experiment is a long one, and they wont be using the LHC at a level at which it can detect the likes of the huggs boson particle for some time yet.
rubberglover 1 year ago
@rubberglover where can get this research and results
UserNameManh 1 year ago
has this extremely dangerous experiment brought any results yet?
UserNameManh 1 year ago
ok philhellenes like all guy's blowing steam, and saying nothing, just reterick & psuedo technical terms, parrot fashion what you have read somewhere, ok lets see if you can get your head around this, does the same size of universe exist through a mirror, as represented on this side of the mirror, and what constitutes real inteligence? and the infinite problem of why men seem not to posses any?
Gail940 1 year ago
Typical humans, we can only understand things by destroying things, smashing them to bits. Another approach is to use our brains to image a beautiful particle that creates a universe.
nikolayzou 1 year ago
@nikolayzou Aww, don't tell me you feel sorry for some particles getting "destroyed" :(
JackeShanTwo 1 year ago
@JackeShan Funny, but no. I just think that science relies heavily on observation and must less on imagination. Do you think Einstein came up with his theory from observation? He used his imagination.
Once we come up with a good theory, we then need to prove it with experiment.
I don't think it's a bad thing to smash particles, but I do think money can be better spent.
nikolayzou 1 year ago
@nikolayzou They've done the imagination bit, now it's time to check their supposition. Checking that what they've imagined actually corresponds to observable reality is a very important part of science, (and of imagining things in general); you wouldn't want to end up like Aristotle, who imagined a lot of things about the Universe, and was laughably wrong about most of them (he claimed that women have fewer teeth than men, for instance; was it that hard to COUNT?!?).
StrikaAmaru 1 year ago
@StrikaAmaru If scientist want to find the secrets of dark energy, using the Hadron Collider is going to get them nowhere. They have already dismissed the idea of an aether, they really need to do more intelligent experiments rather than rely on the false assumptions of the Michelson-Morley experiment. They made a bad assumption about the aether and created an experiment that confirmed their bad assumption. The only good assumption was the possibility of an aether.
nikolayzou 1 year ago
@nikolayzou Point out to me who said anything about the luminferous aether. No, really, do that. What does dark matter/energy have to do with the aether, and what does the LHC have to do with the Michelson-Morley experiment. Between something that splits subatomic particles to check quantum mechanic calculations, and something which checked for variations in light speed, and found none.
I'd like to know that from you, nikolayzou. I can't wait for your answer.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@StrikaAmaru Well the LHC is designed to find the true nature of the Universe, is that correct?
Well the true nature of the universe has everything to do with aether so they are related. What scientist call dark energy and dark matter, I call it the aether. Science have no idea how the aether behaves because they do no research in the area, it's to hard for them, better if it doesn't exist. Search for 'Rare Podkletnov Interview' on You Tube, most interesting. Talks a little about the aether.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou First off: Why would you rename it as aether? Aether already defines something else, even if that something doesn't exist; is there any reason for this renaming other than confusing people? Is it so hard to call it dark matter/energy? If it is, go the way of a certain comic and call it DaME. But don't call it aether.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@StrikaAmaru I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether. Scientist will not call it aether because they would look really stupid to call it something they had dismissed.
It is aether, just aether, not dark matter and not dark energy. The aether is just sub atomic matter that scientist simply don't understand. They already admit they have no idea what dark energy is, but are making the mistake that dark energy isn't that interesting.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou "I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether" 1 of 2
No, they are fundamentally different. Luminiferous aether was the proposed medium through which electromagnetic radiation was proposed to propagate; the Michelson-Morley experiment used interference to prove that light moves at a constant speed regardless of Earth's movement, which was a strong evidence that aether doesn't exist.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@nikolayzou "I think the terms dark energy and dark matter are new terms for what simply is aether" 2 of 2
Dark energy/matter are umbrella terms that describe the "missing mass/energy" (about 95% of the Universe) that cannot be observed electromagnetically, but which we can detect gravitationally. There are hypotheses proposed for it, and a portion of it might be neutrinos. Research is still ongoing. Which already contradicts you...
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
I wish Google gave you more that 500 characters, don't they know that some people are just chatter boxes.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou I wish that too, you can't properly skewer nonsensical beliefs in 500 characters ;)
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@StrikaAmaru Well, time will tell whether my beliefs are nonsensical or turn out to be correct.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou I've watched the first part of the interview you recommended; I've read about his works sometime around 2002.
I'm not sure if you're aware, but gravity shielding and anti-gravity have been pursued since the 1930s and were completely discredited by the 1950s. That might not mean much, since EP uses entirely different methods and theoretical foundation. Still, so far it doesn't look good, and the fact that nobody else can replicate his results does NOT speak well for him.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@StrikaAmaru As far as I have research, his results have been reproduced by NASA for one. There is plenty of information about this topic.
I have no faith in scientist disproving gravity shielding when they have no understanding of what gravity really is.
Gravitons, give me a break, is that the best they can come up with. They even think dark matter are very small particles flying around and that they can build devices to detect them, good luck with that one.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou Alright, again, one at a time.
"I have research, his results have been reproduced by NASA for one. There is plenty of information about this topic."
1) what I found out is that NOBODY reproduced his results.
2) I hope you realize that posting stuff on the Internet doesn't automatically make it valid. You can easily go to a biased or plain insane source, and get information claiming that aliens are stealing people's souls. Until NASA officially publishes results, the answer is NO.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@nikolayzou Secondly: "Science have no idea how the aether [DaME] behaves because they do no research in the area, it's to hard for them, better if it doesn't exist."
It never ceases to surprise me to what extent you conspiracy theorists misunderstand the scientific mindset. Scientists DO research the hard topics; that's what drives them. It goes beyond titles, and grants and Nobel prizes. It's a matter of all-consuming curiosity. Basically, if it exists, we want to know it.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@StrikaAmaru It would really nice if science was driven by a pure need of knowledge rather than a need to keep funding going. But I live in the real world and unfortunately a need to know only comes second.
I am also not interested in conspiracy theories, only conspiracy facts. Did you manage to look up the work on Gravity Modification by Dr. Eugene Podkletnov? That is really interesting and talks about the aether and zero point energy.
nikolayzou 11 months ago
@nikolayzou Funny that you think scientists are unimaginative because they do experiment and observation. Yes experiment and observation is what dominates much of science today, but that doesn't mean scientists are unimaginative at all.
JackeShanTwo 1 year ago
@nikolayzou This is an interesting variation on the Sky Fairy fantasy. It's still bullshit, though.
Why can't you people just leave this mystical bullcrap behind, and use your heads? There is no God (however you want to call him or dress him up), the Universe was not created ex nihilo, we don't know how the Universe came into existence but we're getting there.
StrikaAmaru 1 year ago
oh im sure that particles hit each other naturally somewhere out there in the cosmos much faster than the lhc could ever do. We are still here, im not worried.
bdotalex 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So the Hadron Collider will tell us all HOW. And we'll still need philosophy and spirituality to explore WHY. Don't go throwing your Bibles away yet.
Ear4Beauty 1 year ago
@Ear4Beauty I think the "how" will rule out some of the "whys". For instance; When you know you and your universe are made of atoms, and you know what atoms are and how and from what they form, and then you hear about a "god" that says it "supernaturally wished it all into being", ex nihilo, and you KNOW that not ONE atom has ever appeared ex nihilo, as if it WAS "supernaturally wished into being", then that SUGGESTS that supernatural gods are not the answer. Not proof, but an indicator.
philhellenes 1 year ago 18
@philhellenes supernatural has always been the term coined for something we can't explain. Something beyond our nature. If you took a plasma glass ball back into the 1500's, everyone would think you were a demon or a witch or something.
Nintendodude1994 1 year ago
@philhellenes I am biased. I have already met Jesus and been convinced that His unseparable love gives great meaning to my life. I am biased because the Holy Spirit has given something to me which the world cannot give and cannot take away. By the way, some Quantum mechanics ethusiast want to use Quantum tunneling to preserve the argument that some particles pop into existence ex nihlo for a minute moment. They would probably object ot you discarding good atheist arguments.
Ear4Beauty 11 months ago
@Ear4Beauty
"Quantum tunneling"
Is not the reason for particles popping into and out of existence.
That is the uncertainty principle.
And one of the reason it is known this happens is because it can be measured.
Unlike your delusions.
ytmoog 11 months ago
@ytmoog ...
QUANTUM TUNNELING: particles sometimes pass through barriers which should be impassable. This phenomenon has well-defined probabilities, and is caused by matter having the same particle-wave duality as light.
UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE, the: aka the Heisenberg principle, it states that you can't know both the momentum and the position of a particle. Has v long explanation.
VIRTUAL PAIR PRODUCTION: particles popping in and out of existence; main cause why nothing can reach absolute zero.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
@Ear4Beauty Nah, go ahead and throw them away.
PonAdidas 1 year ago
@Ear4Beauty: But why do we need a "why?" Are we that conceded that there must be a reason for our very existence? What if were just here because of natural events. Even if there is a "why," how can we automatically attribute it to a god? Why cant we just admit that we dont have the capabilities thus far? The universe is far larger and mysterious than we can imagine now, or maybe ever. Search in Google the Pale Blue Dot photo and try to convince yourself that a god created that dot for us.
LilDrummerBoy74 11 months ago
@Ear4Beauty You don't need religion to explore "WHY"
That's one of the things science discovers and pursues.
gaikokujinNor 11 months ago
@Ear4Beauty The universe often does things that don't have a "why", I think philosophically speaking, that's one of the most important things quantum mechanics has shown us.
SaraCufer 11 months ago
@Ear4Beauty yes please DO throw your bible away. i think its totally acceptable to philosophy about our origins and why we're here, but its really stupid to believe God (if there is one or not no one knows) is the one portrayed in the Bible or any other stupid manmade religions. a guy that gets mad? has emotions? that created us from his very own image? lol dont make me laugh, if we're made out of his image than he already sucks, proving that he doesnt exist (the bible god) in the first place.
BattousaiHBr 9 months ago
type in the biggest secret in astronomy and look for ProfM videos.
JFAINTER88 1 year ago
Thank you. Very impressive presentation.
seanreillyireland 1 year ago
The starving would be far more interested in finding out what exists inside the rubbish bins behind the LHC cafe.
Rob187ok 1 year ago
Fucking Epic Ending Statement damn that's my key phrase for now ;D
pashaahsj 1 year ago
Yeah, (real)ly wrong. One generation smugly says their theory is absolutely correct and they gloat on about how smart they are. Then the next generation proves what fools the last age of scientists were and on and on it goes.
orange70383 1 year ago
A subtler knife, perhaps!
mikevern69 1 year ago
"Hardly anybody says it out loud [...] but what they are really looking for [...] other planets like their own."
So beautiful. :)
amulware 1 year ago
i heard the universe is actually 27 billion yrs old.
JFAINTER88 1 year ago
@JFAINTER88
From who? The general consensus is 13.7 billion years, give or take 120 million.
gguilford72 1 year ago
"hopelessly out of scale" - they should put that in text books LOL! Thumbs up!
ReasonableMe 1 year ago 9
maybe we should just give people fish instead of building this so we can have even more generations expecting entitlements for doing nothing
gonadcancervictim 1 year ago
Sound like sensational advertising for something that costs billions and will give us even more questions to ponder requiring even more funding to solve, but if it does produce a black hole well that's gonna suck, and suck in even more money.
Jammieg001 1 year ago