Snow in the winter is not a particularly good argument... If You consider Earth's orbit, variable distance to the sun and axis tilt, you get a proper cause of the seasons. That being said, the pollution and CO2 emissions shouldn't affect our winter holidays. It would be wise however to consider health issues (CO2 is only life giving gas if You're capable of photosynthesis) and the fact that fossil fuel resources are NOT sustainable, and they WILL run out sooner or later - alternative is needed.
If you think about it, the economic breakdown in the western world has only started since we had this so called globle warming. just another excuse to tax us more and more. when will people get it, the world is cooling not getting warmer, how difficult is it to get this into peoples thick fucking heads
Godfrey Bloom is quite right. The CO2 scam is yet another excuse for corrupt liar politicians to get their hands on our hard earned income via yet more taxation.
Anthropogenic Global Warming, a scam courtesy of Bilderberg, GE, and the covert communists in the various "green" parties. What a coalition! And the Danaos' gift from Honnecker, FDJ-Merkel, now also promotes it: Her effect on West Germany is worse than 15,000 T80 and 30,000 BTR60s/BMPs.
You know plants breathe carbon. If it were actually a problem (which it's not), giving your cash to bloated, selfish bureaucrats would simply make you more poor and them more rich.
co2 being 200,00 times greater would not mean the effect would be increased by that magnitude, we are talking about a sphere so the effect is calculated in relation to that fact, there is a lot more going on at Venus such as volcanic activity that could have been spurred on by the onset of a sharp spike in the average temperatures
I love how this "Carbon Footprint" thing came out of NOWHERE. Just one day, BAM! "Carbon footprint. Carbon footprint." It is a scam. We need to be responsible with this earth, but PEOPLE > TREES.
This man, like of the rest of the UKIP rabble, is an affront to democracy and civilized society. I would like to offer my sincere apologies to all German people in respect of his disgusting antics this week.
to bad he totally lost his sense with the stupid hitler-remarks because i definitely agree with him that the whole global warming debate is out of line.
The problem with politicians is that when they lie, most of the population don't realize it. They think that politicians are in their high posts because of their truthfullness and high moral standards. It's quite the opposite; Lies, betrayal and greed has brought most of the high ranking politicians to their respective posts.
Al Gore is just one of them, using lies about global warming because of greed and an urge to make sensation and money.
what a douche. thats fucking all we need, some british fag spewing bullshit like CO2 doesnt cause global warming. GET YOUR HEAD OUTTA YOUR INDUSTRIAL ASS!!
@gerby90: Now I understand! The planet Venus is so hot because the CO2 atmosphere is actually a coolant. :P Thank you, Mr. Bloom, for this thermodynamics lesson. Maybe you could also tell me your latest plans for a perpetuum mobile.
@albedoshader The planet Venus is hot because it's the second planet from the Sun. The greenhouse effect of CO2 would pale in comparison to that simple fact...
@Stryyda: There's one planet that's nearer than Venus - Mercury. Now let's check Mercury's surface temperatures. According to your theory Mercury has to be a lot hotter (4 times hotter) than Venus because it's half as far away from the sun.
Highest temperature on Mercury: +420°C
Compare this to Venus' surface temperature of over +460°C, although Venus gets only 25% of Mercury's solar irradiation.
The greenhouse effect on Venus is a fact. Learn some thermodynamics.
@albedoshader Venus's atmosphere is 95% CO2 and it's atmospheric pressure is 92 times greater. So that's ( (95 / 0.04) * 92 = 200,000 ) times more CO2 per unit volume than on Earth. Of course you're gonna have intense warming then. That doesn't mean an increase from 0.04 to 0.06 percent over the next 100 years on Earth will lead to catastrophic warming.
@ScootleRoyale: First of all your arithmetic implies there's a linear relationship between temperature and CO2 pressure/fraction in the atmosphere, which is not the case. Secondly your calculation also silently implies that the effect on earth would have to be about 1/200000th of the effect on Venus, which again is not the case. You don't say this directly but both your calculation and your implication are incorrect. You don't take any hetat conductivity etc. into account.
@albedoshader: Sorry, I mean heat conductivity. Another important difference is the venus has a synodic period of roughly 116 days, that's about 1/2 venus year. Another interesting effect is that Venus would be even hotter without the eternal cloud cover. The clouds reflect a great percentage of sunlight back into space. This effect also wasn't taken into account by you.
On earth the greatest amount of heat is radiated back into space at night in the form of infrared radiation.
@albedoshader: That's simple thermodynamics. So the thermal equilibrium (depending on current low CO2 fractions) doesn't need as much CO2 to be shifted towards other temperatures, be it towards higher or lower temperatures is another story.
@albedoshader You just put words into my mouth I never said "CO2 is 200,000 times more concentrated on venus, therefore the greenhouse warming on earth should be 200,000 times less" I was simply responding to your argument. You were the one comparing earth to venus, not me. I know the relationship between CO2 and temperature is more logarithmic/inverse, not linear. In fact I think that's the strongest reason the alarmism is aload of nonsense.
Dear Mr. Godfrey Bloom and all that think similar!
It terrifies me to see how science and its messages seems not to be understood to the slightest extend to so many of our time. The mechanism behind the greenhouse effect of CO2 is well understood since more than one hundred years. Also it is alarming, that there still are decision takers, that do not understand that climate and the weather is not at all the same.
It is so easy to put up big words and to tear apart a well established knowledge that is represented in thousands of scientific papers and reports.
So please – if you do not want to be suspected of illiteracy or bribery – please find sounder arguments for your case. And if you go and look for those arguments in sound science – you will find that the planet is about to confront us with an answer itself.
So please – if you do not want to be suspected of illiteracy or bribery – please find sounder arguments for your case. And if you go and look for those arguments in sound science – you will find that the planet is about to confront us with an answer itself.
CO2 levels rose quickly during the Permian period and declined again during the Cretaceous period. Does this imply dinosaurs caused a global warming by burning fossil fuels?
In all seriousness, even science knows little about all workings of nature and discovers new things almost daily. Despite what you think it is NOT a proven fact that the current global warming is caused by humans alone, as co2 levels and temperatures rise and fall quickly all the time during history.
Furthermore, what is your solution to it? We can't get all our power from alternative energy sources (yet) and the only solution to a co2 problem caused by humans alone is by stopping co2 usage altogether ..
Perhaps go back to the old days when we didn't have cars or electricity?
And do you eat meat? Did you know cows are responsible for a lot of global warming?
Yeah, the globe has been cooling since 2002? WTF. What's next? The globe has been cooling since the last month? Yeah, everybody understands of climate science. No need to spend years studying and doing research.
@blabby102 You don't need to be a scientist to know bullshit when you see it. Just as you don't need to be a surgeon to know if a surgeon has killed his patient, or a car mechanic to know if the mechanic has fixed your car.
I've have disscused this issue with Godfrey Bloom online. I got in touch with him, he replied and I corrected the points that he made and I asked for a reply, twice. And you know what, he had never got back to me.
Recently, I heard us free thinking skeptics referred to as anti environmentalists. I wanted to correct this person, but in doing so I would have been humiliated and not believed, as most other people in the room were left wing alarmists. And today, a rather uneducated left wing idiot told me I and UKIP were racist (heard it all before). Only the uneducated think that. UKIP is Britain's salvation.
The IPCC’s latest report, Climate Change 2001, actually says about predicting the future climate: “The Earth’s atmosphere-ocean dynamics is chaotic: its evolution is sensitive to small perturbations in initial conditions. This sensitivity limits our ability to predict the detailed evolution of weather; INEVITABLE ERRORS AND UNCERTAINTIES in the starting conditions of a weather forecast amplify through the forecast. So HOW can this accurately represent anything?
NIce use of Ad hoc arguments. Pure rhetoric, no substance. I could have written the same speech using techniques I learned in advanced rhetoric classes. Start a speech with complements. Imply a normative belief. Imply common sense. Implicate an expert. Implicate similarity with the audience. Ad hominem those who disagree.
Now if he wants to join the realm of science, he needs to behave like a scientist in his argument style. Science has a way of mitigating rhetoric and getting to the substance of an argument. To start, if he wants to elevate his argument to realm of science, he needs to elaborate what independent science. You must always name your sources in science. If you don't name your sources, you've lost all your credibility.
@rytallica898 Are you saying he lost all credibility because he didn't cite his sources in the small window of oppertunity he had to speak his mind. Here's a novel idea, email his office and ask for the sources instead of presuming he hasn't seen the data.
@daliOtter Sorry for the 6 months late response. I don't habitually check my comment responses.
Any argument can include abbreviated references, e.g., "Researchers at university of chicago suggest...", or "Squire and Wilkins, 2008, found evidence that...". The second or so needed to say that outweighs anything you can cram in your short speech. It gives people interested in the substance of an argument a lead to follow.
@daliOtter I've debated countless scientists, we use abbreviated references all the time. Almost nothing argued means anything without them.
How about this. I will email his office. As a scientist, I know that if his office produces references to credible evidence published in a credible, PEER-REVIEWED journal, it will overthrow my views. If however, as I expect, his office either doesn't produce evidence or produces evidence from a crack-pot journal, it will merely confirm hypothesis.
@rytallica898 Good idea! Ask for credible, peer-reviewed journals! I think all of so-called global warming deniers totally agree. Perhaps you could do some effort as well by looking up some credible sources instead of bothering a politicians secretary for that. Just choose between one of the many thousands of climatologists' credible, peer-reviewed journals and start digging. However i'm not sure you will, as your probably just writing this to try to justify your comments.
Follow the money. They had a remit, ordered and paid for by their masters. If they failed. Tenure will be ended.
This is not science. This is blackmail!
Al Gore would NOT combine the ice data he showed of CO2 against temp. because it would blow away any presumption of CO2 creating temp. changes. Its the other way round!
@puremager369 Sorry to reply 6 months late — I rarely check responses to my comments. That said, I am in fact implying all scientists must argue in a defined way. Arguments in science occur in the realm of data and peer-review. Every public argument I've ever had in science has happened by trading theory and sources. Nothing that person says has ANY gravity without a source. That's the way it goes in science.
Hopefully, one day, those that pushed this pseudo-science will be held accountable. Starting with the "honorable" Al Gore, who is surprisingly out of sight these days...
i hope all the anti-EU elements get on board the global warming denialism train of irrationality and undermine all aspects of their insular, backward policies.
By the way, look at all these empty seats in the Parliament (notably those normally occupied by the corrupt political class) and think of how much they get paid out of our pockets...
Well if global warming is taking place, it has bugger all to do with us. I heard that some volcano in the Philippines exploded and erupted for two years. In that time, it gave off more CO2 than we have produced since civilisation began!
"Volcanic CO2 presently represents only 0.22% of anthropogenic emissions" lifted straight from a published article
volcanoes release on the order of 200 Mte/yr of CO2, while human CO2 releases from fossil fuels alone were estimated at 8.7 Bte/yr (source: CDIAC)
but you heard some volcano in the Philippines exploaded and gave off more CO2 than from when civilisation began right???? the propensity of CC denialists to believe everything their little echo chamber of blogs spews out is incredible.
A barrel floating in the ocean will grow a seaweed farm. It would be easy to create rainforest sized algae farms mid ocean. The seaweed farms would photosynthesis, as well as the lifeforms themselves would be made of carbon.
Cheap. Proactive. Harmless.
Also mid ocean seaweed (algae) farms could be towed to counties in need for emergency food fuel.
No downside.
Build seaweed farms from shore and tow them out to sea and anchor them. Polluting companies could sponsor the low costs.
I completely agree with UKIP on everything apart from this......Checkout Potholer54's profile if for some reason you're fucking stupid you think global warming isn't happening. Or read some scientific journals or papers...
Those who stand in denial of global warming^ have FAILED in the last 15 years(!) to produce A SINGLE(!), peer-reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and -evidence- of human-induced climate change.
Aussie here applauding you also Godfrey. Our Prime Minister and his lackeys should all be in prison with Al Gore. Also Guys, check out Lord Monckton interviewing a greenie on YouTube, just goes to show how stupid these sheeple can be.
u.s.a. here saying Godfrey Bloom is my new hero also. so good to see someone speak the truth and calling these alarmists out for the crooks they really are - CHEERS TO YOU GODFREY FROM THE FREEZING COLD U.S.A. !!!
Don't tax the world! Tax the sun! It is emitting heat! Not as much as Al Gore's hot air propaganda spewing from his mouth. Cap and trade the sun and let the poor people in Africa industrialize. A solar panel cannot run a hospital.
How to fight tyranny. Time and time again boycotts result in nothing. Coca cola company most vulnerable to a boycott. Concentrate efforts instead of spreading the strength. Join the boycott make this grow. Then join Max Keiser's fund and make money as they are toppled. Need a good reason to boycott? Coke heavily endorsed Copenhagen, even making a website lovingly called Hopenhagen. Please make this effort grow to start having an effect and toppling some of the corporations that control us.
How sweet it would be if Godrey, Nigel Farrage & Lord Monkton all 3 got together to create a plan to destroy that filthy power hungry thieving New World Order. I ain't your slave you tyrannts scum. Applause to Godffrey another one with courage to speak out against gutless dictators lies.
its about control. and one aspect of that control is moving production from Western Economies into China and other well-enslaved populations. any middle-classed, or anybody at all with wealth that doesn't work for them, is a threat to them and will be destroyed.
So to conclude, you really have to look at the common sense of it all. Its not that difficult, there are easy ways to fix the problems that are happening in this world right now. But some of these power hungry, over paid individuals will have to lose there jobs in power for it to happen. Thank you.
They played this off as a "save the American economy" plan. It was nothing of the sort. If they would've handed out that money to every legal citizen of the US, I think the calculation came out to $500,000 to each person, in each family. All that money would have went right back into banks, mortgages would have been paid off, and all the other frivolous BS that American sheeple would have bought. The American financial crisis would have been over in a week.
They're seeing a trend in the Earth's temperature and using it to their advantage. To convince the populous that you should pay a tax that will somehow save the planet. We are already an over taxed western society. That's brings me to point my father made a few month's back, about fixing the American economy. The trillions in bailout money that was dispersed out to a very select few like minded corporations, looking to seize control of all your "dollars", for the sake of greed and control.
Climate skeptic? = ill-informed
kevycanavan 3 weeks ago
Snow in the winter is not a particularly good argument... If You consider Earth's orbit, variable distance to the sun and axis tilt, you get a proper cause of the seasons. That being said, the pollution and CO2 emissions shouldn't affect our winter holidays. It would be wise however to consider health issues (CO2 is only life giving gas if You're capable of photosynthesis) and the fact that fossil fuel resources are NOT sustainable, and they WILL run out sooner or later - alternative is needed.
michktt 1 month ago
If you think about it, the economic breakdown in the western world has only started since we had this so called globle warming. just another excuse to tax us more and more. when will people get it, the world is cooling not getting warmer, how difficult is it to get this into peoples thick fucking heads
ITS ALL ABOUT TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX
tomasbobby 1 month ago
what an idiot!!!
mtlilr 1 month ago
I love this guy!
LitwinOnTour 2 months ago
Godfrey Bloom is quite right. The CO2 scam is yet another excuse for corrupt liar politicians to get their hands on our hard earned income via yet more taxation.
RedGoblinus 4 months ago 2
i like this guy more and more
andyOsalek 4 months ago
Global warming can only be enforced by theories and scare tactics, not facts or common sense.
payot 6 months ago
fuck you old man, global warming is REAL!! REEEAAAALLL!
MacZambrottVEVO 6 months ago
@MacZambrottVEVO
Get your head out of the clouds mate, youve been brainwashed.
Back down here on Earth, the thermometers say that you are wrong.
Besetho 3 weeks ago
@Besetho That`s why we had one of the warmest winters in the last decades...
SuperJuliusC 2 weeks ago
i love this guy. he's the man!!!!
drusha1 6 months ago
I trust in Man-made Global Warming Consensus ($), don't you?
Money! More money! Loads of money!! -- It's getting warmer, don't ya feel?
Axxess7777 7 months ago 2
Oh shit! Snow still exists!? Well I guess that proves it... Who cares about what all these so called "climate scientists" think, right?
Jesus fucking Christ; not everything is a conspiracy you goofy fucks
97%... get shit on
rtisdell 7 months ago
@rtisdell lol, that was not the main argument. Watch the video again and maybe you will catch it this time.
SuperGukke 6 months ago
Anthropogenic Global Warming, a scam courtesy of Bilderberg, GE, and the covert communists in the various "green" parties. What a coalition! And the Danaos' gift from Honnecker, FDJ-Merkel, now also promotes it: Her effect on West Germany is worse than 15,000 T80 and 30,000 BTR60s/BMPs.
ziegle9876 7 months ago
You know plants breathe carbon. If it were actually a problem (which it's not), giving your cash to bloated, selfish bureaucrats would simply make you more poor and them more rich.
mark32811 9 months ago
global warming is bullshit it is.
viper10011 9 months ago
This assertion is not helpful in a room full of socialists.....because they're thinking.....oh yeah.....more taxes....that's an added benefit....
sixtiksix 9 months ago
CO2 only increases after the warming, not the other way around.
kaderoder 10 months ago 3
EU = UESR (Union of European Socialist Republics)
konstantino12 10 months ago
Hes right on... its a SCAM!! a TAX SCAM!
silvergoldhedge 10 months ago 4
co2 being 200,00 times greater would not mean the effect would be increased by that magnitude, we are talking about a sphere so the effect is calculated in relation to that fact, there is a lot more going on at Venus such as volcanic activity that could have been spurred on by the onset of a sharp spike in the average temperatures
essy0976 10 months ago
nice. Naaah I don't think tha this is just because the government is sooo evil abnd wants more money, but maybe partially...yes
KingRodriques 1 year ago
I love how this "Carbon Footprint" thing came out of NOWHERE. Just one day, BAM! "Carbon footprint. Carbon footprint." It is a scam. We need to be responsible with this earth, but PEOPLE > TREES.
GeekingForJesus 1 year ago
RIP man caused global warming 2009
GreenChurchReject 1 year ago 26
@GreenChurchReject
There is no global warming caused by man.
chewbaca1989 9 months ago 10
Comment removed
rytallica898 1 year ago
STOP THE FUCKING MAFIA CO2 TAX IN UK!!! TAX THE FUCKING SOOT IN DIESELS!!!! - THERES YOUR SOLLUTION TO CLEAN AIR!!!!!!
wneq 1 year ago 14
omg, muse in the intro!! and bloom is awesome too
arsenal0119 1 year ago
For all you global cooling deniers:
So, why did "The ice caps melting will drown you all", master AGW crook Al Gore buy a sea level condo in San Francisco for $4 million dollars?
Seems the man does not believe his own lies.
m1aws 1 year ago
This man, like of the rest of the UKIP rabble, is an affront to democracy and civilized society. I would like to offer my sincere apologies to all German people in respect of his disgusting antics this week.
TimMiddleton 1 year ago
wow. what a retard. in so many ways...
AlPinski 1 year ago
Whatever the broader merits of his politics his understanding of the science is completely shitty.
lowenklee 1 year ago
shame on Bloom
edwinvanbunderen 1 year ago
to bad he totally lost his sense with the stupid hitler-remarks because i definitely agree with him that the whole global warming debate is out of line.
vandelay10 1 year ago
how much is he paid by the industry?
SuperLittleHelper 1 year ago
im a geman , can i vote him ?
riba199 1 year ago
@riba199
If you like "Ein Reich , ein Volk ein Füher", go and vote for him. This man is a clown.
taizecellist 1 year ago
what a cock
brighton6886 1 year ago
The problem with politicians is that when they lie, most of the population don't realize it. They think that politicians are in their high posts because of their truthfullness and high moral standards. It's quite the opposite; Lies, betrayal and greed has brought most of the high ranking politicians to their respective posts.
Al Gore is just one of them, using lies about global warming because of greed and an urge to make sensation and money.
FreddoX1 1 year ago
what a douche. thats fucking all we need, some british fag spewing bullshit like CO2 doesnt cause global warming. GET YOUR HEAD OUTTA YOUR INDUSTRIAL ASS!!
gerby90 1 year ago
@gerby90: Now I understand! The planet Venus is so hot because the CO2 atmosphere is actually a coolant. :P Thank you, Mr. Bloom, for this thermodynamics lesson. Maybe you could also tell me your latest plans for a perpetuum mobile.
albedoshader 1 year ago
@albedoshader he didn't say CO2 was a coolant. He said it's not a pollutant. He also said the earth appears to be cooling. You put the two together.
JEMS1871982 1 year ago
@albedoshader The planet Venus is hot because it's the second planet from the Sun. The greenhouse effect of CO2 would pale in comparison to that simple fact...
Stryyda 1 year ago
@Stryyda: There's one planet that's nearer than Venus - Mercury. Now let's check Mercury's surface temperatures. According to your theory Mercury has to be a lot hotter (4 times hotter) than Venus because it's half as far away from the sun.
Highest temperature on Mercury: +420°C
Compare this to Venus' surface temperature of over +460°C, although Venus gets only 25% of Mercury's solar irradiation.
The greenhouse effect on Venus is a fact. Learn some thermodynamics.
albedoshader 1 year ago
@albedoshader Venus's atmosphere is 95% CO2 and it's atmospheric pressure is 92 times greater. So that's ( (95 / 0.04) * 92 = 200,000 ) times more CO2 per unit volume than on Earth. Of course you're gonna have intense warming then. That doesn't mean an increase from 0.04 to 0.06 percent over the next 100 years on Earth will lead to catastrophic warming.
ScootleRoyale 11 months ago
@ScootleRoyale: First of all your arithmetic implies there's a linear relationship between temperature and CO2 pressure/fraction in the atmosphere, which is not the case. Secondly your calculation also silently implies that the effect on earth would have to be about 1/200000th of the effect on Venus, which again is not the case. You don't say this directly but both your calculation and your implication are incorrect. You don't take any hetat conductivity etc. into account.
albedoshader 11 months ago
@albedoshader: Sorry, I mean heat conductivity. Another important difference is the venus has a synodic period of roughly 116 days, that's about 1/2 venus year. Another interesting effect is that Venus would be even hotter without the eternal cloud cover. The clouds reflect a great percentage of sunlight back into space. This effect also wasn't taken into account by you.
On earth the greatest amount of heat is radiated back into space at night in the form of infrared radiation.
albedoshader 11 months ago
@albedoshader: That's simple thermodynamics. So the thermal equilibrium (depending on current low CO2 fractions) doesn't need as much CO2 to be shifted towards other temperatures, be it towards higher or lower temperatures is another story.
albedoshader 11 months ago
@albedoshader You just put words into my mouth I never said "CO2 is 200,000 times more concentrated on venus, therefore the greenhouse warming on earth should be 200,000 times less" I was simply responding to your argument. You were the one comparing earth to venus, not me. I know the relationship between CO2 and temperature is more logarithmic/inverse, not linear. In fact I think that's the strongest reason the alarmism is aload of nonsense.
ScootleRoyale 11 months ago
bravo.sir i salute you! HIZZAH,HIZZAH,HIZZAH! 8)
1dabirdman 1 year ago
This message needs to be broadcast into every livingroom. Thank you Mr. Bloom.
subseatech 1 year ago
Dear Mr. Godfrey Bloom and all that think similar!
It terrifies me to see how science and its messages seems not to be understood to the slightest extend to so many of our time. The mechanism behind the greenhouse effect of CO2 is well understood since more than one hundred years. Also it is alarming, that there still are decision takers, that do not understand that climate and the weather is not at all the same.
guldisloo11 1 year ago
It is so easy to put up big words and to tear apart a well established knowledge that is represented in thousands of scientific papers and reports.
So please – if you do not want to be suspected of illiteracy or bribery – please find sounder arguments for your case. And if you go and look for those arguments in sound science – you will find that the planet is about to confront us with an answer itself.
guldisloo11 1 year ago
Comment removed
guldisloo11 1 year ago
So please – if you do not want to be suspected of illiteracy or bribery – please find sounder arguments for your case. And if you go and look for those arguments in sound science – you will find that the planet is about to confront us with an answer itself.
guldisloo11 1 year ago
@guldisloo11
CO2 levels rose quickly during the Permian period and declined again during the Cretaceous period. Does this imply dinosaurs caused a global warming by burning fossil fuels?
In all seriousness, even science knows little about all workings of nature and discovers new things almost daily. Despite what you think it is NOT a proven fact that the current global warming is caused by humans alone, as co2 levels and temperatures rise and fall quickly all the time during history.
dhs81 1 year ago
@guldisloo11
Furthermore, what is your solution to it? We can't get all our power from alternative energy sources (yet) and the only solution to a co2 problem caused by humans alone is by stopping co2 usage altogether ..
Perhaps go back to the old days when we didn't have cars or electricity?
And do you eat meat? Did you know cows are responsible for a lot of global warming?
dhs81 1 year ago
C02 is a life giving gas not a pollutant.
The green agenda is political in nature.....using scar tactics to gain political power.
GreenChurchReject 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy used to work for the European Oil agency
Mrrockitman 1 year ago
this guy used to work for the European Oil agency
Mrrockitman 1 year ago
Isn't global warming a bit like saying, "The water in the ocean is ruining the seas"?
Ulfvaldr2012 1 year ago
Yeah, the globe has been cooling since 2002? WTF. What's next? The globe has been cooling since the last month? Yeah, everybody understands of climate science. No need to spend years studying and doing research.
ShwangShwing 1 year ago
So is this guy a scientist? How many climate scientists did he talk to and how many research papers did he read in order to get his statistics?
Or is this guy just spewing out the same crap as Lord Monckton?
Statistics is a difficult subject and research papers, especially with statistical analysis are often difficult understand for the average layman.
If you put any of these claims to an actual scientist, there are simple explanations to all of them.
blabby102 1 year ago
@blabby102 You don't need to be a scientist to know bullshit when you see it. Just as you don't need to be a surgeon to know if a surgeon has killed his patient, or a car mechanic to know if the mechanic has fixed your car.
drewmandan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out the film "iron mountain" at archive dot org
theelectrifier 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out the film "iron mountain" at archive dot org
theelectrifier 1 year ago
nice accent sir.
NottinghamForest22 1 year ago
Godfrey Bloom well done sir
warchild1976 1 year ago
8/21/2010 - Notice how Al Gore has been in hiding since his scam has been exposed.
DONGOE 1 year ago
@DONGOE The evil Oil corporations are pushing global warming so they can get cap and Trade passed. The Global warmers are oil shills
Dayversion 1 year ago
@DONGOE yea he's hiding out with osama bin laden
theelectrifier 1 year ago
Well.. too fucking late for that!
TMDLex 1 year ago
u fukin tell them cunts bloom!
wardydave 1 year ago
I've have disscused this issue with Godfrey Bloom online. I got in touch with him, he replied and I corrected the points that he made and I asked for a reply, twice. And you know what, he had never got back to me.
Richard482 1 year ago
Godfrey Bloom any global warming is caused by all the HOT AIR you produce when you speak!
blondtim20 1 year ago
Recently, I heard us free thinking skeptics referred to as anti environmentalists. I wanted to correct this person, but in doing so I would have been humiliated and not believed, as most other people in the room were left wing alarmists. And today, a rather uneducated left wing idiot told me I and UKIP were racist (heard it all before). Only the uneducated think that. UKIP is Britain's salvation.
MelonHeadFilmz 1 year ago
it's funny how these Man-made global worming fanatics went in a frenzy about Swine flew it just shows how naive they are.
MrGilles1990 1 year ago
The IPCC’s latest report, Climate Change 2001, actually says about predicting the future climate: “The Earth’s atmosphere-ocean dynamics is chaotic: its evolution is sensitive to small perturbations in initial conditions. This sensitivity limits our ability to predict the detailed evolution of weather; INEVITABLE ERRORS AND UNCERTAINTIES in the starting conditions of a weather forecast amplify through the forecast. So HOW can this accurately represent anything?
Chrisfre 1 year ago
Except...he's wrong.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
What a douchebag, he should do some research before he runs his vagina all over the place.
Dirondack 1 year ago
What a twat, honestly ... and I thought people from BNP are the biggest loosers there, seems like UKIP sent their man as well!
chenjifeng 1 year ago
NIce use of Ad hoc arguments. Pure rhetoric, no substance. I could have written the same speech using techniques I learned in advanced rhetoric classes. Start a speech with complements. Imply a normative belief. Imply common sense. Implicate an expert. Implicate similarity with the audience. Ad hominem those who disagree.
rytallica898 1 year ago
Now if he wants to join the realm of science, he needs to behave like a scientist in his argument style. Science has a way of mitigating rhetoric and getting to the substance of an argument. To start, if he wants to elevate his argument to realm of science, he needs to elaborate what independent science. You must always name your sources in science. If you don't name your sources, you've lost all your credibility.
rytallica898 1 year ago
@rytallica898 Are you saying he lost all credibility because he didn't cite his sources in the small window of oppertunity he had to speak his mind. Here's a novel idea, email his office and ask for the sources instead of presuming he hasn't seen the data.
daliOtter 1 year ago
@daliOtter Sorry for the 6 months late response. I don't habitually check my comment responses.
Any argument can include abbreviated references, e.g., "Researchers at university of chicago suggest...", or "Squire and Wilkins, 2008, found evidence that...". The second or so needed to say that outweighs anything you can cram in your short speech. It gives people interested in the substance of an argument a lead to follow.
rytallica898 1 year ago
@daliOtter I've debated countless scientists, we use abbreviated references all the time. Almost nothing argued means anything without them.
How about this. I will email his office. As a scientist, I know that if his office produces references to credible evidence published in a credible, PEER-REVIEWED journal, it will overthrow my views. If however, as I expect, his office either doesn't produce evidence or produces evidence from a crack-pot journal, it will merely confirm hypothesis.
rytallica898 1 year ago
@rytallica898 Good idea! Ask for credible, peer-reviewed journals! I think all of so-called global warming deniers totally agree. Perhaps you could do some effort as well by looking up some credible sources instead of bothering a politicians secretary for that. Just choose between one of the many thousands of climatologists' credible, peer-reviewed journals and start digging. However i'm not sure you will, as your probably just writing this to try to justify your comments.
DestinationUnknownNL 1 year ago
@DestinationUnknownNL
Follow the money. They had a remit, ordered and paid for by their masters. If they failed. Tenure will be ended.
This is not science. This is blackmail!
Al Gore would NOT combine the ice data he showed of CO2 against temp. because it would blow away any presumption of CO2 creating temp. changes. Its the other way round!
Don't believe me? YOU DO IT!
m1aws 1 year ago
@rytallica898 He had a very small time to speak... Are you saying all scientists have to argue the same way?
puremager369 1 year ago
@puremager369 Sorry to reply 6 months late — I rarely check responses to my comments. That said, I am in fact implying all scientists must argue in a defined way. Arguments in science occur in the realm of data and peer-review. Every public argument I've ever had in science has happened by trading theory and sources. Nothing that person says has ANY gravity without a source. That's the way it goes in science.
rytallica898 1 year ago
what he's saying is so good to hear because its so right.
MelonHeadFilmz 1 year ago
what a cool guy
lulu001100 1 year ago
Bloody well right mate!
Aaron5191975 1 year ago
Hopefully, one day, those that pushed this pseudo-science will be held accountable. Starting with the "honorable" Al Gore, who is surprisingly out of sight these days...
nobama6 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know, I think 3.1 billion tonnes of Toxic Pollutants every single year from North America alone is pretty bad.
MicroMistery 1 year ago
I like this guy because he shows up the EU parliament for what it really is...A JOKE!!!
ZeusZol0 1 year ago 5
Greetings from Florida - where it's still too cold to go out without a jacket.
aznravechild6i9 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His arrogant and cocky styled way of talk makes me want to punch him no matter what he says. I raelly do hate these kind of people. Fuckin* Prick...
blueinkonya 1 year ago
i hope all the anti-EU elements get on board the global warming denialism train of irrationality and undermine all aspects of their insular, backward policies.
daviclond 1 year ago
Yep, government will profit more from "clean energy" than they would by merely planting trees.
Paul013065 1 year ago
He got it!
By the way, look at all these empty seats in the Parliament (notably those normally occupied by the corrupt political class) and think of how much they get paid out of our pockets...
Nickohlson 1 year ago
YES
mikeymacs12 1 year ago
Well if global warming is taking place, it has bugger all to do with us. I heard that some volcano in the Philippines exploded and erupted for two years. In that time, it gave off more CO2 than we have produced since civilisation began!
arisuta2 1 year ago
P.S. also Scotland has had the best snow for skiing in about 30 years and my parents have been almost housebound due to the snow and ice.
arisuta2 1 year ago
lmao you're completely wrong.
daviclond 1 year ago
Oh really? Do explain what I said that was so wrong.
arisuta2 1 year ago
"Volcanic CO2 presently represents only 0.22% of anthropogenic emissions" lifted straight from a published article
volcanoes release on the order of 200 Mte/yr of CO2, while human CO2 releases from fossil fuels alone were estimated at 8.7 Bte/yr (source: CDIAC)
but you heard some volcano in the Philippines exploaded and gave off more CO2 than from when civilisation began right???? the propensity of CC denialists to believe everything their little echo chamber of blogs spews out is incredible.
daviclond 1 year ago
I agree! No such thing as "global warming"... Governments just want your money!
LordWellington15 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A barrel floating in the ocean will grow a seaweed farm. It would be easy to create rainforest sized algae farms mid ocean. The seaweed farms would photosynthesis, as well as the lifeforms themselves would be made of carbon.
Cheap. Proactive. Harmless.
Also mid ocean seaweed (algae) farms could be towed to counties in need for emergency food fuel.
No downside.
Build seaweed farms from shore and tow them out to sea and anchor them. Polluting companies could sponsor the low costs.
Win Win Win
RichLOAguy 1 year ago
I completely agree with UKIP on everything apart from this......Checkout Potholer54's profile if for some reason you're fucking stupid you think global warming isn't happening. Or read some scientific journals or papers...
Stimpynator 1 year ago
Agree with you there. Potholer54 or Greenman3610 are both informative
Richard482 1 year ago
Hail godfrey bloom, thats bang on the money, GLOBAL WARMING IS A SCAM !
bull1ttproof 1 year ago
Scam?
Tvdhakla 1 year ago
Good to know someone is saying something besides normal rablle like nothing is going on.
passionplayer7 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this wanker congratulates the French Government bombing the protest vessel Rainbow Warrior and killing a Portuguese photographer.
I hope he either apologises for being a thoughtless cunt, or meets a painful demise
feijoa37 2 years ago
He was referring to the sinking, not the death.
I am pretty certain virtually nobody recalled a person died in the bombing.
But alas now everyone is an expert on the subject.
pizt 2 years ago
@feijoa37 you sound like a rite mug!!! you call him a cunt, but i think your a cunt!!! what ya gota say about that??
johnnyAlJazeera 2 years ago
i hope your English lessons are going well.
pizt 1 year ago
what fucking lol idiot whahahahahaha
mORRon goddamn
ziggaza 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its VERY easy:
Those who stand in denial of global warming^ have FAILED in the last 15 years(!) to produce A SINGLE(!), peer-reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and -evidence- of human-induced climate change.
aerobique 2 years ago
That was awesome. Good man right there!
tabre 2 years ago 3
He is great, I love him :D
rdk89 2 years ago 3
Why?
Tvdhakla 1 year ago
@Tvdhakla because there is no such thing it's all bullshit!
rdk89 1 year ago
eh?
Tvdhakla 1 year ago
finally! ENDLICH!
rs3800 2 years ago 3
This sham reached many areas - politics, education, agriculture, industrial, research, entertainment etc.
I don't blame those that believed in GW - what else would you think when you were consistently lied to on television, movies, in class etc.
But those that perpetrated this fraud should be prosecuted. Finally - the emperor has no clothes!!!!!!!
Freenetnow 2 years ago 11
@Freenetnow beautiful reply!
RELATED:
KillerSpray [] com
vhsjvc 1 year ago
You Sir, should be given a knighthood, but in my heart I know you will not.
How much has AL Gore and those that sell their sould to the devil made out of this fiasco!
Money, Control, Power, that is more addictive than tobacco!!
Mandyv
xyzto1 2 years ago 3
@xyzto1 "soul" sorry
xyzto1 2 years ago
Beautiful! I kind of want to hug this chap.
leichenzedeichen 2 years ago
Godfrey Bloom = Farken Legend
Remember Y2K Millenium Bug, same shit
hankhonker 2 years ago
thank you sir! 4 telling the truth !!
infokriegerBerlin 2 years ago 4
BobbyDurst,
I agree!
digitalfilmvillage 2 years ago
This dude is the real deal.
BobbyDurst 2 years ago 3
Aussie here applauding you also Godfrey. Our Prime Minister and his lackeys should all be in prison with Al Gore. Also Guys, check out Lord Monckton interviewing a greenie on YouTube, just goes to show how stupid these sheeple can be.
Chris51 2 years ago
Sir, this American thanks you.
aznravechild6i9 2 years ago
Upright, bloody, bleeping hilarious and on the spot.
campcasey62 2 years ago
u.s.a. here saying Godfrey Bloom is my new hero also. so good to see someone speak the truth and calling these alarmists out for the crooks they really are - CHEERS TO YOU GODFREY FROM THE FREEZING COLD U.S.A. !!!
kmadys 2 years ago
freezing in my ass, you pussy yankee.
Friss99 2 years ago
Love it!!!
vanzorge 2 years ago
You GO Godfrey!! Tell these naive and mindless idiots.
ChipsShot 2 years ago
From America, I applaud you
BeyondLame 2 years ago 2
anAL GOREtentive
Armigerous 2 years ago
This guy is my new hero!
nuktubian 2 years ago
Brilliant
exemmer 2 years ago 2
YES!
phishivore 2 years ago 3
Finally someone with balls!
peterjvr1983 2 years ago 4
Don't tax the world! Tax the sun! It is emitting heat! Not as much as Al Gore's hot air propaganda spewing from his mouth. Cap and trade the sun and let the poor people in Africa industrialize. A solar panel cannot run a hospital.
absofdough 2 years ago 8
...and, that's a wrap folks!
energ8t 2 years ago
Legend. Thank you.
lmtlsss 2 years ago 2
YESSSS!!!!!!!!! GET EM!!!
KingKarolus222 2 years ago
How to fight tyranny. Time and time again boycotts result in nothing. Coca cola company most vulnerable to a boycott. Concentrate efforts instead of spreading the strength. Join the boycott make this grow. Then join Max Keiser's fund and make money as they are toppled. Need a good reason to boycott? Coke heavily endorsed Copenhagen, even making a website lovingly called Hopenhagen. Please make this effort grow to start having an effect and toppling some of the corporations that control us.
MayonR 2 years ago 3
Spot on!
mlennox48 2 years ago 15
Finally !
ambulancier 2 years ago 7
so,...there r some brits with us...??? eh...?
wilatemodel 2 years ago 5
wow. the truth spoken, who listened?
johngaltexpres 2 years ago 4
God bless him! A real man! There is still hope for this world to wake up.
filida 2 years ago 7
How sweet it would be if Godrey, Nigel Farrage & Lord Monkton all 3 got together to create a plan to destroy that filthy power hungry thieving New World Order. I ain't your slave you tyrannts scum. Applause to Godffrey another one with courage to speak out against gutless dictators lies.
robreiken 2 years ago 7
Great man.
Schnorttschnott 2 years ago
God bless Mr. Bloom for exposing the great power grab.
Hashplant47 2 years ago 4
good man. I will vote UKIP next time
zephiloyd 2 years ago 4
watch?v=jtn3kks3H_o
WHENYOUREALISE 2 years ago
try again please, it was a malformed ID
zephiloyd 2 years ago
its about control. and one aspect of that control is moving production from Western Economies into China and other well-enslaved populations. any middle-classed, or anybody at all with wealth that doesn't work for them, is a threat to them and will be destroyed.
SOUND THE ALARM!!!
Palmatronnobs 2 years ago 4
Wow. Don't see him on mainstream tv.
depletable 2 years ago 5
He is spot on. I wish we had people like this in Denmark.
envisioner 2 years ago 4
Short & Sweet...
IBParanoid 2 years ago 4
most excellent.
rockachopa 2 years ago 6
The Swedish government is backing up the scam 100%
SwedishDictatorship 2 years ago
lol. it seems jeremy clarkson had good reason to dislike environMENTALISTS.
JESUSSDAD 2 years ago 5
So to conclude, you really have to look at the common sense of it all. Its not that difficult, there are easy ways to fix the problems that are happening in this world right now. But some of these power hungry, over paid individuals will have to lose there jobs in power for it to happen. Thank you.
tonytonyistony 2 years ago 2
nice rant bro.
JESUSSDAD 2 years ago 2
They played this off as a "save the American economy" plan. It was nothing of the sort. If they would've handed out that money to every legal citizen of the US, I think the calculation came out to $500,000 to each person, in each family. All that money would have went right back into banks, mortgages would have been paid off, and all the other frivolous BS that American sheeple would have bought. The American financial crisis would have been over in a week.
tonytonyistony 2 years ago
They're seeing a trend in the Earth's temperature and using it to their advantage. To convince the populous that you should pay a tax that will somehow save the planet. We are already an over taxed western society. That's brings me to point my father made a few month's back, about fixing the American economy. The trillions in bailout money that was dispersed out to a very select few like minded corporations, looking to seize control of all your "dollars", for the sake of greed and control.
tonytonyistony 2 years ago 2