Programs still run best on intel based desktops and servers. I've been in the IT field for over 15 years. I give AMD credit for trying but they need to do better, and when they do Intel prices will drop.
amd does not pay off companies to use their cpu's on mainstream computers lol.. amd does not have something called DRM on you cpu which allows intel to track you microsoft has this too.. lol if you are smart you use AMD... unless u don't mind getting ur privacy invaded :D and if you are making a medium to high end computer you want an amd.. because it is cheaper runs almost as fast as intel and is unlocked most of the time :D you can't beat amd in price-performance. I am an amd Fan SUE ME! :D
@Tutuze4armenia Exactly. Way to go. That´s what´s keeping AMD alive. They give their customers what they´re asking for. Intel is just TOO EXPENSIVE for that little more performance.
The new Shanghai core did a remarkable job in making the server more energy efficient. The new AMD 45nm quadcore is actually very strong at virtualization and database workloads.
The power consumption compared to an equal Xeon based server is way lower and it can save a lot of money in energy costs.
I dont understand why all these Intel fans want AMD to go under. If you look at things from an Economical point of view, AMD is a non-profit organization. I dread the day of total Intel monopoly.
thats right.......I can still remember when I bought my first PC.... it was a INTEL 80386sx20 20.1 Mhz with 2 Mb RAM and a "SUPER" VGA card 800x600 and with a 41 Mb HDD, a 14" Monochrome "high res" Monitor and a LEXMARK 9dot matrix......... Total Price in 1989: Dkr=19.700 (3,727.60 US $ or 2,644.08 £) of those 19.700 Dkr. The Price of the INTEL CPU was about 8.900 Dkr. Allmost half of the total price........If Intel was to regain monopoly a P4 dualcore would be 160-170% of the price today
I think it's unlikely that businesses will allow AMD to go under. Too many people remember the Intel monopoly, which was truly horrible for business.
That doesn't mean AMD won't go bankrupt in the process, and wipe out shareholder value.
From my point of view, the "safe" play, is to purchase equal dollar amounts of Intel and AMD. If AMD goes through bankruptcy and restructuring, you can expect INTC to double and you get your money back. If AMD survives, it's probably a 10 bagger.
lol yeah rite try ocing a budget amd againsted say a e7200 it out proformes the amd (same tye of processor specs of e7200)with no problems n has lower power consumption
Programs still run best on intel based desktops and servers. I've been in the IT field for over 15 years. I give AMD credit for trying but they need to do better, and when they do Intel prices will drop.
lschlutt73 2 weeks ago
amd does not pay off companies to use their cpu's on mainstream computers lol.. amd does not have something called DRM on you cpu which allows intel to track you microsoft has this too.. lol if you are smart you use AMD... unless u don't mind getting ur privacy invaded :D and if you are making a medium to high end computer you want an amd.. because it is cheaper runs almost as fast as intel and is unlocked most of the time :D you can't beat amd in price-performance. I am an amd Fan SUE ME! :D
Tutuze4armenia 1 year ago
@Tutuze4armenia Exactly. Way to go. That´s what´s keeping AMD alive. They give their customers what they´re asking for. Intel is just TOO EXPENSIVE for that little more performance.
PatriotGermanEmpire 11 months ago
@abaj006: wtf... amd a non profit organization??? LOL leave the crackhead comment at home
jkk20 1 year ago
hi hi
Robpattinson5 2 years ago
Hi, Uncle John it's Kristen! My Mom didn't understand one word of what you said!
Robpattinson5 2 years ago
AMD for live
AtiCrossfireX 3 years ago 3
The new Shanghai core did a remarkable job in making the server more energy efficient. The new AMD 45nm quadcore is actually very strong at virtualization and database workloads.
The power consumption compared to an equal Xeon based server is way lower and it can save a lot of money in energy costs.
frankknopers 3 years ago 2
I dont understand why all these Intel fans want AMD to go under. If you look at things from an Economical point of view, AMD is a non-profit organization. I dread the day of total Intel monopoly.
abaj006 3 years ago 6
I am an intel fan but i agree as soon as amd is gone intel will be outragesly priced
heartsofstone989 3 years ago 2
Who said AMD WILL go?
computergasm 3 years ago
thats right.......I can still remember when I bought my first PC.... it was a INTEL 80386sx20 20.1 Mhz with 2 Mb RAM and a "SUPER" VGA card 800x600 and with a 41 Mb HDD, a 14" Monochrome "high res" Monitor and a LEXMARK 9dot matrix......... Total Price in 1989: Dkr=19.700 (3,727.60 US $ or 2,644.08 £) of those 19.700 Dkr. The Price of the INTEL CPU was about 8.900 Dkr. Allmost half of the total price........If Intel was to regain monopoly a P4 dualcore would be 160-170% of the price today
carsten8850 3 years ago
I think it's unlikely that businesses will allow AMD to go under. Too many people remember the Intel monopoly, which was truly horrible for business.
That doesn't mean AMD won't go bankrupt in the process, and wipe out shareholder value.
From my point of view, the "safe" play, is to purchase equal dollar amounts of Intel and AMD. If AMD goes through bankruptcy and restructuring, you can expect INTC to double and you get your money back. If AMD survives, it's probably a 10 bagger.
fuzzywzhe 3 years ago
@abaj006 I support AMD cause it´s american, it´s a good competition and I hate MONOPOLies on the market.
PatriotGermanEmpire 11 months ago
lol yeah rite try ocing a budget amd againsted say a e7200 it out proformes the amd (same tye of processor specs of e7200)with no problems n has lower power consumption
kalvin2314 3 years ago
Okay Johnny, I sure hope you can deliver. AMD has some credibility ground to make up.
Aquineas 3 years ago