Added: 4 years ago
From: DCompose
Views: 25,460
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (418)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • >.< yes! you said emo! aw, day has been made.

  • I hated the fact that they changed the costume and Venom never introduces himself as we and he sounded very of he has a deep roar

  • the last move would have been a lot better if they had split it up in 2 separate movies.

  • did you noticed the hob goblin mask when harry gets out of the chamber

  • The ending reminded me of how Venom blew up in Ultimate Spiderman. Though, in the movie I'm assuming he died since there won't be a Spiderman 4.

  • ahh man

    sony announced that there will be no Spiderman 4

    instead there going to reboot the series

    what do u think about this kevin?

  • ye a new rebbot. i'm hopeful. spidey 3 was awful. hollywoodisation killed it and made it cringing and unbearbly cheesey, like the time he said "later chump" and dropped down to the sewers (approximately a 5 cm drop) in a ballet pose. spidey 2 was serious. the best superhero film of all time. spidey 3 was just TERRIBLE. soooooo cheesey, rushed and depressing with all the stupid crying and.... i tell you what, if you want my thoughts, watch "how spiderman 3 should have ended". that sums it up 4 me

  • is this a joke. i stopped watching after the first minute, when you said spiderman 3 is better than 1. come on, spiderman 3 was awful, there was nothing good to take from this movie, this is the batman and robin of the spiderman franchise

  • could scorpion venom be in spiderman 4

  • Personally I think Harry should have became Venom in the movie. That would of made the story a lot better.

  • i want the clone saga to happen before carnage and lizard

  • they never actually name the villains after the comics coz like spidey referred to venom as brock and also they always reffere to them as there surname

  • first of all venom cant be dead the bomb didnt kill harry and every one knows venom is just as strong as green goblin or stronger venom is better in the movie then in ultimate spiderman because hes not big so in the suit hes not big in ultimate hes a little tiny guy but in the suit he as big as the thingthe suit dosent make the host that big in the comics eddie was a big man he could bench 400lbs so when he put the suit on he was big the movie was good but venom cant be dead

  • They didn't make Venom as big as they should of.

  • this venom sucked. He better be in sm4. If he had more screen time and he was actually named then I wouldn't mind if he wasn't in sm4. But since one of the biggest spider-man villains got trashed he should no, better be in it.

  • I think Venom will be in SM4 and will lead him to be a anti-hero, with will lead into his spinoff.

  • or maybe eddies dead,the symbiote escapes and bonds to someone else.

    maybe mac gargan

  • But that Basically Eddie redundant. No Anti-Venom no Scoropinion ethier.

  • Ok,Mac Gargan has to become Scorpion before he bonds with the symbiote and they can't put all that into one movie.If the fans want a classic villain,they will probably get the Lizard or Carnage in the 4th movie (if there is one).If Harry got a few scars,so Eddie couldn't have died(if he did,there should at least be a body,so we may see him in SM4.On the other hand,Sam Raimi doesn't give a shit about Venom,so I wouldn't be surprised if they never mention what happened and never show him again...

  • like they say

    the bigger they are

    unless they are the main hero the less screen time they get

  • in 5 or 6 acctually and he has his own spin off comming out :)

  • he is not in sm4 the black cat and the vulture are the villians

  • @Phantomphoenix888 you might as well scrap that because they are rebooting the frachise

  • @Phantomphoenix888 I wish buddy.I wish...

  • no they never named venom

  • I like that 70s show but they made venom less powerfull and kinda silly looking. Spiderman is supposed to kick spidermans ass and he is supposed to be huge.

  • u just said spiderman is supposed to kick spidermans ass ????????

  • to stay true to the comics spiderman should have clever jokes and if carnage is in the next movie since sam is god with horror movies carnage should be seen as an insane scary nightmare that Actualy kills in a spiderman movie.

  • Eddie Brock was suppose to be a buff mean white dude.

  • they better bring venom back he is to kick as not to

  • I think 2 is the best

  • what i think is cant venom turn invisible?

    maybe he did and is just waiting to get strike so to speak

  • yeah he can but u know, the hero always win and gets the girl...sorta

  • he never turned invisible

  • Maybe part of the symbiote was kept on him when he was supposably pushed out of the symbiote. I mean Brock's body was never recovered. I highly doubt that it would desinegrate all of brock's body and the symbiote. As it seen in the comics and the movie Venom is not easy at all to kill.

  • i enjoyed 1 and 2 equally well to one another, i loathed 3..

  • literally i agree with everything u said. EVERYTHING

    1) spidey 2

    2) spidey 3

    3) spidey 1

  • I DISAGREE!! NUMBER 1 WAS THE BEST, FOLLOWED BY 3 THEN TWO.

    and i agree that it was very rushed

  • i like the idea of gettting pushed out the way

  • What do you have against the first movie. The first movie was great, almost flawless, part 3 was a flaw

  • The only thing i didnt really like about the whole Venom thing is that 1 at first I always thought venom was blue, due to the comic colors, and Marvel vs Capcom, but i didnt really mind that but what DID was that they made Venom... like PUNY they didnt make him the Big Muscular Venom he is supposed to be... idk that just kinda annoyed me

  • The movie was too rushed. They should have saved Venom, and just introduced Eddie Brock. It should have just been Spider-man and Sandman. Venom could be in the next movie. Kristen Dunst has had some okay movies. Your right about the Emo thing. Gwen Stacy should not have been in the movie. Venom/Eddie got so little screen time. I liked Harry in the movie. They should not have killed of Eddie, maybe the symbiote. Your right about Venom. The Sandman ending was weird. Raimi never wanted to use Venom

  • I totally agree. I wasnt dissapointed with spiderman 1, because the story was well put together on screen and wasnt rushed. The same with part 2. This had to much stuff rushed and the whole 15 minutes of venom and venom going to ask for help is redicolous. I wasnt dissapointed by the first 2 movies and I have been reading spiderman comics for a while, but I was dissapointed by 3 and that is due to a story and certain main characters that where rushed and thrown in to get me to go see it.

  • i don't think it was a good idea to introduce Venom so soon.

  • shut up he's going to be in spider-man 4

  • how they killled him off. and he's going to be in his own spin off

  • Venom Was Good In The Movie, People Say He Wasnt Vicious enough. I thought he was too vicious they should have made him like the venom in the comics where he wouldnt hurt anyone except spider-man. They Really F***ed Up Venom in Spider-Man 3

  • i agree with you on, but I really feel what hurt Venom was his lack of screentime I mean he barely gets 15 minutes in the movie

  • I Timed The Movie

    The Black Suit Came In Over Half Way Through The Movie

    Oh Well Good Review

  • I don't like the fact that Venom diden't refure to himself we or us.I would been more Venom like.I really hope Venom comes back in the fourth one.Also I heard Sam Raimi really disliked Venom and Carnage.

  • Nah, the Lizard and Morbius are in the third. The Venom movie is a possibility thjough. I heard they are making both Spiderman 4 and Venom

  • Yeah but they diden't really finish the Venom story in the Spider-man movie seris.

  • hurt that he wasn't developed ? He had less screen time than 2-face ! 2-face was thrown in last minute too ! I'm hurt that such a threatening foe and a grea villan was givin such under development and little screen time !! Am I wrong for that ? (Other than that the movie was decent)

  • i will admit that they did do a few things right in the movie, like sandman's cgi effects

    i still think spiderman 1, and 2 are alot better

  • Comment removed

  • i like your thinkings skills becouse you said that the lizard ,kurt connors kept a sample of the symbiote

  • i thought the new goblin looked nothing like a goblin so i think he sucked.

    Venom kept taking his cool face off.

    Not enough black suit.

    Peter spent too much time cryin rather than saving the world.

    Sandman was the only decent character

    4 stars

    Cool movie

    Under developed characters

  • i hated spiderman 3

  • show us your comic book collection! ppppppllllllleeeeeeeaaaaaaaass­ssssssseeeeee!!!!!!!!!

  • that was eddie brock JR. not seniour, so hopefully eddie seniour will come in 4, attach to the symbiote (dr. connors lab, etc) and the reason 4 him 2 be super pissed at spiderman was 4 killing his son...fingers crossed

  • Eddie brock Sr. was a skinny old scientist.

  • I just want to see the real Eddie Brock.

  • does harry die in the comics ?????

  • yes but not how he did in spiderman 3

  • k thx how ?

  • by overdossing the goblin formula

  • yes he did

  • nxt film they should introduce an angry father who blames spidey for death of his son.he shud be built like a brick shithouse nd be called eddie brock senior.the proper eddie brock.the investigation into his sons death would lead him to the symbiote that connors has and elpresto, venom is born. he could even be an ex reporter sacked for his inability to get a picture of spidey(in first film robbie said "eddie's been on it for a week").

  • Eddie brock sr. wasn't a huge guy, he was a old scientist.

  • I think you are talkin about Ultimate Spider-Man but Brock jr. was a body builder you right

  • No I'm talking about the real Eddie brock.

  • k

    ok

  • one problem they get the story from the comics and didint eddy brock sr. died in ultamate spider besides he was a scienctist

  • there will be a spiderman 4 with peter fighting the sinster six and a venom will has a spinoff

  • i agree with kev on everything. I find this movie is overly bashed i mean it was definatley one of the best comic book movies.

  • joker

  • wat?

  • i hated spiderman 3

  • I was bitterly dissapointed by the movie myself, Venom especially. Although I like your way of thinking, you said; If you've read the books, you wont like the movie as much. I never thought of it that way, thanks. I still think Raimi could of done a little better though (No stupid music scenes, no emo, Venoms voice, the chameleon-esqe powers of the costume, and a better explainaton as to why the Venom/Sandman teamup-and why Parker let him go so easily-he was going to kill him just now!!!

  • my problem was that venom didn't refer to him self as we

  • i agree.

  • that and the syimbiote never talked and they never showed venom in peters refliction

  • I find spiderman 3 to be the second best in the series

  • Alright, I didnt like the movie, no origin for venom. Eddie Brock was played by the wrong actor, to short and too skinny.

  • YEEEEEEEEESSSS

  • Eddy brock was a weight lifter in the comics if i'm correct

  • he lifted weights to relieve stress...Didn't help.

  • well he was when he got the suit

  • eddie brock always was a bodybuilder since his college days.

  • I thought that Venom needed to have a completely different film. I couldn't stand when Venom searched for Sandman, or pulling his face back to talk.

  • they have a deleted scene where venom and spiderman fight in he church and thts when he gets tells his name

  • where did you see this? / find this out?

  • i saw it on the internet its spiderman 3 church scene extended

  • what webpage

  • this one

  • i mean what is the webpage for the scene

  • it was cool just too short

  • i liked the movie but they left out a lot of stuff important stuff i had to explan to my friend like the origin of venom and sandman and a hole bunch of other things but it was a good movie i give it a 4 and a half stars

  • I'm not sure why Spider-Man 3 wasn't as good as the previous movies, but it wasn't because they had multiple villians. The Dark Knight had three vllians counting Scarecrow, and it kicked ass.

  • scare crow was in it for about 2 minutes though

  • yeah, but venom had a cut down time to, so they must of thought it would of been okay. Stupid idiots

  • venom's stature in this movie was too small, was like carnage or something. the actor is too boyish both in size and demeanor, spider-man's is one thing, but venom's.... basically their interpretation of venom is perfectly piss poor, imo. sandman was pretty cool. overall movie was mediocre.

  • Can only agree with you.

    The way the portray Venom in the movie was more like the way i see Carnage.

    Venom ain't suppose to be the same size as Spider-Man and make shrill-shrieks....That's Carnage.

    Venom is suppose to be big and muscular with a mighty roar (or something).

    And Topher Grace was wrong from the beginning, he doesn't have the physique or The Balls to play the character Eddie Brock.

  • i think topher should have been peter from the beginning because he is the dork that peter was before his powers.

  • Okay it really looked like Venom died and that SUCKS! why the heck would you do that Venom is Spidy's arch nemisis He's the ultimate villain. also yeah Harry's death trippy but the real question is Why kill him.

    I have to disagree though because it seemed to me that Pete and MJ are together and may be married in #4 P.S. the best Combo of villais is Venom returned and Carnage cause th goo brothers are the best ones because they are 100% EVIL.

  • I agree with you VENOM SHOULD BE THE MAIN VILLAIN IN A SPIDEY MOVIE!!

  • dude i watched spiderman 3 and used a stopwatch to time venom ( only when eddie and the symbiote were joined) and i got 4:oo mins of screen time for him. seriously WHAT THE HELL??????

  • they did say it was venom j jonah when hes watching the fight after he gets jipped for the camera for that girl steals the name after a guy in the crowd decides to call him venom

  • Spiderman 3 was horrible compared to 1 and 2. Whenever they try to introduce several villains at the same time they always mess it up. Focus on ONE villain instead of trying to CRAM as much in and thus hurting the plot.

  • your right dude

  • Spiderman has movies signed till 2015

  • i heard that theres gonna be 7 spidey movies

  • venom wasnt CGI it was a costume

  • So there were no aspects of him that were not computer generated? Did you look at his head, obviously a costume.<-sarcasm

  • well the scenes where the suit goes off his face yeah, but nothing else is CGI, thats all that was!

  • this was the first movie i ever went to see alone and it was so much fun

  • Eddie Brock supposed to be big guy not Topher Grace size.

  • at last someone who hates Spider-Man 3 to death! I agree with lot's of your "cons". I think Spider-Man 2 is still the best but SM3 isn't as horrible as people say

  • lmao giratin his pelvis hahahaha

  • great review man

  • they also didnt show alot of eddie brock ,i mean venom is spidermans greatest enemy and they just killed him off in a stupid way but some parts were good like when he beat the shit out of harry but i liked it the costumes were amazing and i liked how they had a few funny lines and jokes ext.

    :)

  • venom was a fag

    in the movie it was more of a love story and i didnt like that they put three villans in there i also didnt like when peter parker got the symbiote he became emo

  • I don't hate the movie. I liked it, but I did not think it was as good as the first two. The Story lines seemed a bit rushed. Venom was way rushed. they could set him up for Spider-man 4 instead of throwing him in the last 20 minutes of this film. Gwen Stacey was pointless. There was no reason for her to be there. Sandman was excellent but I don't think he should have been Uncle Ben's killer because it ruined Peter whole reason for becoming Spider-man.

  • are you freakin crazy the move sucked I love spider man and venom is my favorite but all of you comic book lovers need to stop with this I'll take what I can get additude If a comic move sucks have the balls to say it put it this way . that's the move that represents the comic I love and that's all we have If you say bad comic movies are good then directors are going to continue not to care and just think any pies of shit with lots of special effects will do GROW SOME BALLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I tried to convince myslef that Spider-Man 3 was good. Anyone who asked me if I liked it, and I would always say, ya its great. but it really sucked, really did. Im glad Marvel has control over the movies now, Iron Man was AMAZING.

  • i totally agree with you, look how well they did ironman. spiderman needs to be redone with a different cast in my opinion cause they picked the most BORING cast ever,and strangely toby magurie is mutch funnier in the games based off the movies, its sam rami he is a moody son of a gun.

  • I really think a good line for venom would be if he said We are venom. That would be cool.

  • This is what should happen in Spiderman 4:

    Norman Osborn returns and forms the Sinister Six (Green Goblin, Doc Ock, Venom, Electro, Chameleon, Shocker) and fights Spiderman, Sandman and the Lizard.

  • horrible idea

  • Bad: only thing good is that Norman was hiding in the comics and thought to be dead so...he "could" come back but he probably wont

  • Just wanted to let Dcompose and you guys know

  • venom is not dead he is ging to star is his own spin-off movie.The producers revelded this after spidey 3 came out.they started looking for A-list directors on febuary 2 2008

    it is unknow if Tropher grace is playing venom.(ps. iron man is in the new hulk movie).

  • venom is not dead he is ging to star is his own spin-off movie.The producers revelded this after spidey 3 came out.they started looking for A-list directors on febuary 2 2008

    it is unknow if Tropher grace is playing venom.(ps. iron man is in the new hulk movie

  • ur right dcompose. soooooooo many people had thier idea of what the movie would be like, everbody would get disappointed. because in the end i think we just need to watch the movie and see how good it really was. sam did a good job on this 1 and i hope he directs # 4.

  • I thought it was great to watch in the movies. DCompose, i agree completely with everything you said except i thought it was better than the 2nd. The i didnt enjoy the 2nd. I also liked the gliding out of sandman. The ending was a bit long aswell.

  • The movie was good,but i din`t liked the short appearence of Venom(like u said the 2nd most important spidey`s villiant).Before i saw the movie,when i saw the trailers with the black coctume I hoped Venom will be the main Villian in spiderman 4.Like the slow evolution of harry osborn to New Goblin.If there is spiderman 4 with no venom inside i will be pissed off.

  • Hey, Spider-Man 3 wasn't great, but it was the worst Marvel movie in the world. That title belongs to Elektra...or Daredevil. Both just aren't very good.

  • i agree wit u bout thinkin venoms not dead wat i belive is tht if theres a spiderman 4 they hav da villians b carnage nd venom b/c venom didnt get enough screen time so mabye its lik a little introduction to him den da symbiot dat connors has will spawn another whcih wud b carnage idk mabye mabye not

  • u think they shud make spiderman 4

  • venom didn't get enough screen time.

    they should have gave him a whole spider-man film helping spider-man take on carnage

  • this is a joke... how was this movie rushed? it was practicaly 3 hours of nothing1!!!

  • It rushed famous points of the comics. Black costume was hardly worn. venom wasn't in it enough. And the whole harry osborn was rushed with him changing his mind about liking peter every 10 minutes

  • What i realised when I was Spider-man I the other night is that JJ says "Eddie has been on it for months.." but still couldn't get a picture. I thought this movie contridicted itself way too much.

  • SPIDER-MAN 3 SUCKED THE BIG ONE !!!

  • ur gay it was awsome

  • i notcie that curt coners had the samlpe too so i think its carnage

  • i notcie that curt coners had the samlpe too so i think its carnage

  • I Hope that Carneg is in the next one.

  • who dosent?

  • i dont think carnage is the best choice four spidey 4.

  • in the movie venom just went straight to anti-hero

    that was wac

  • Venom never got to portray the anti-hero role at all. Either you have no concept of the term, or you really didn't pay attention to the movie.

  • I want Venom back. Screw this spinoff ideas & these ideas that Goblin Serum is stronger then a symbiote. I don't care if an alien's weakness is fire. It's not fair... 5 minutes for crap sakes people! common!

  • good review but i think there shoud not be three villains in one movie and they shoud have focused on venom more and in the end show venom give birth to carnage

  • totally agreed dude. Venom was excellent in this movie except for two things - one he needed to be a LOT buffer and a bit bigger. 2 - HES NOT a killer, he protects the innocent, he just hates spidey. so the way they had him kill harry with no remorse was a embarassment to us venom fans...

    Sam Raimi seriously needs to learn more about venom... hope in part 4 Venom is better. Cuz hes definitely not dead. Carnage and lizard will prolly be in 4.

    Sandman was excellent in this movie. Definitely.

  • Actually that's not entirely true. Venom was first introduced as pretty much the exact same 2-dimensional killer he was in the movie.

  • the movie was good, but they should have saved sandman for another movie...this should have focused on the black suit and venom.

  • i read somewhere that someone is thinking about a venom movie project

  • I can agree with some things you said. Spiderman 3 was a good movie, but I fucking hated the ending. It just looked like "oh honey let's just be friends." Nice comment on Dr.Conners, it makes sense. What I would like to hear from you is your take on the upcoming Iron Man movie. Do you think it will be all show or just all hype? And DO YOU WANT to see a Spiderman 4?

  • venom is dead i sw his rib cage in the explosion

  • i think that venom will return in his own saga off movies

  • Wow. You Got All the Villians For Spider-Man 4 Right

  • Very Early? It Came Over a Hour In The Movie.

  • i agree with the emo garbage. wish venom wouldve named himself as such. if you know the symbiote, and spider man, and eddie, u know the symbiote knows everything peter does and transfers it to eddie ala venom "tiger, spidey sense". the very end was so horrible. gwen was throwaway. mary jane turning on peter made no sense after the whole harry thing.

  • hey dcompose can u talk about the hulk movie, the second hulk movie coming out in june and the world war hulk series plzz do so thanks man and btw do u know if u have all of the spiderman comics

  • hey kev,

    if you could improve spider-man 3's Venom, what would you do?

    (ex. make his references from "I, me," etc., to "we, us,". never make his face peel back. etc. )

  • Tell that to the people who worked so hard on it!!

  • Carnage should b potrayed by Jim Carrey or Matthew Lillard.

  • NOT Jim Carrey! If you remember, Jim Carrey has already played The Riddler in Batman Forever starring Val Kilmer. Beside's, it's too early for Carnage. He's not until later.

  • carnage dosent even show up till way after venom. we barley saw venom in 3 and now people want carnage in 4? there are more villians than just carnage and venom. if carnage is 2 appear they orgin needs to be right. he will most likely come in # 6.

  • originally, venom keeps reffering to himself as we, and that was left out. kindof detracts from the idea of the simbyote overtaking brocks body and mind.also venoms just a fighter in the movie, and just screams all the time when hes actually spose to be extremely inteligent.