The UK's Nazi King Edward VIII, Duke of Windsor: Traitor & Enemy of Britain. (Part 3)

[OMGaNEWBIE]

Wallace was the worst thing that could have happened to King Edward VIII.

He got so thin after hooking up with her. Actually both of them became very bony.

Yes, she loved to party......I wonder if the hold she had on him, which puzzled everyone, was cocaine?

No, the British Royals did not want her around. Wallace wanted to be a royal so badly that she conned her hubby into hobnobbing with the Nazi's, just for the sake of her own ego. She is so skankie looking. Yukkkkkkie!

[BritishRepublican]

@OMGaNEWBIE I think getting Edward VIII's head cut off as per King Charles, or him shot dead as per Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria would have been a much worse thing for Edward than meeting up with Wallace, though better for the country, as would the elimination of the whole Windsor dynasty, Russian or French revolution style.

[EuromanMovieReport]

why didn't a Royal Navy sub sink that ship with them on-board they sailed from from Portugal??

[BritishRepublican]

@EuromanMovieReport Good idea though a republican Navy would be more likely to drown a royal.

We need thinking like yours on the For Freedom Forums at "FIGH. TK" so please accept my invite to you to register with us.

[vlasified]

"the duke was overheard saying..."and they call these hatefull rumors evidence?

[skiingpowder10]

what a fucking traitor.. This motherfucker should have been killed by firing squad.. you all know that The Windors.. is a made up name.. the family actually has a german last name. They are German bluebloods

[mak34237]

You Idiot learn History before you question the Queen Allegiance to Britain! The Duke of Winsor may have been a Nazi but other royals where not!

[DCFunBud]

Hitler once described Queen Elizabeth, the late queen mother, as "the most dangerous woman in Europe" (to Nazi Germany), because of her ability to rally the spirits of her people during the Battle of Britain. This hardly sounds like a the matriarch of a "Nazi royal family."

[BritishRepublican]

@DCFunBud By the time of the Battle of Britain it was politically expedient for one branch of that royal family to oppose Hitler.

Such royal families operate to keep power no matter who wins by having one branch of the family on every side.

If Hitler would have won then King Edward but Hitler lost so King George.

All the Windsor royals supported Hitler & Franco while they exterminated German republicans in 1933 and Spanish in 1936-39.

Few aristocrats opposed the Nazis from day one.

[JoJosG]

@DCFunBud Well hey man if that makes you feel better about the truth then by all means let that be your defense mechanism. It still doesn't negate what really happened. Nothing in World History happened the way the official story happens.

[sallymaggiespotty]

Why was this traitor not tried at Nuremberg for high crimes???

[lastminuteregret]

@sallymaggiespotty Why would he have been tried at Nuremberg? That was for members of the German Nazi Party and Political and Military leadership. It was not a trial for members of a royal family who happened to sympathize with a resurgent Germany.

[tremooloo]

Giving up the throne for that pooch faced skank??? Holy cow. She must have sucked his brain out through his cock!

[jaifalta]

either way it's a german royal family and the money stays in the German line, Getting rid of Edward they got his brother George and present day Queen Elizabeth.

Whatever the power swayed if Germany had come on top, Edward would of been King of England once again.

Since Germany didn't win the German royal family is still safe and so is their money and power hahaha

[astridbelge]

I think kate middleton is capable of anything, like wallis

sheer horror that the heir of throne is in the power of such a woman

[johneunson]

edward was a simple man. neither he or wallis were too bright, t hey were party people. churchill did not want them in britain..he had orders from...guess!! yes, buckingham palace. if edward was at all anti british, it may been revenge on his father, who treated him badly. and the distant mother ,who damaged himm sexually. edward needed a mother figure to love him. he found wallis.

[BritishRepublican]

johneunson - Churchill did not take his orders from the Palace. The UK may have a muddled constitution from hell but it is not absolute monarchy.

Even though a very bad monarch like Edward VIII can eventually be got rid of, by then it is too late to avoid a world war to defeat the fascists whom monarchists have promoted.

Therefore all kingdoms and monarchies must be swept away in democratic republican revolutions world-wide to prevent nuclear world war and the end of civilisation.

[johneunson]

i agree with your last sentence. but...never underestimate the power of buck house. they have many powerful people working in the background. churchill did not take his orders from the windsors, however he did go out of his way to help them. he ensured that george vi was always seen in a good light.

[AvatarMarxon90]

@BritishRepublican Oh, so if a majority wants a Constitutional Monarchy, you'd still go for a revolution? Okay, nice. It explains all I needed to know. Your words say everything. And let me help you: learn some history before you say that all monarchists are fascists. In truth, there are far more Republicans pro-fascism than monarchists. Don't try to throw dust on people's eyes, please. Not all of us are as dumb as you try to imply with your words. For the love of democracy!

[Termin888]

Boot the royal traitors out of Buckingham Palace !!!