Funny enough about the "easier to travel part", I have a Lowepro slingshot 202 aw and the bag fits all my gear perfectly with the 70-300 but if i had a 70-200 with all their internal zooming, it wouldnt be able to fit at all. The other thing i wanted to mention was even with the aperture being relatively small, the IS does serious work and lets me get blur free images at incredibly slow shutter speeds.
@SmellsLikeUpDawgg The 100-400L is f/4.5-5.6 so this is a improvement. Plus, Canon already has 300 f/4L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS which are rather expensive but those are primes. If they would make a 70-300 f/2.8L it would be a big lens, distorted at 300mm most likely and with a big price tag! I find the 70-300L lacks some contrast though.
Damnit Kai, you make me really fucking nervous when you don't use a neck strap while handling expensive equipment! Especially when you dangle it over a railing above water. Wear a neck strap for the love of god.
why do you all keep wanting this freakn lens? I got it today for christmas, it's fucking heavy, it looks fucking rediculous around your neck on your canon, you'll get a sore back/neck/arm holding it all day or w.e. Plus you have to be like 10 meters away from something for it to focus and take a picture, i much prefer y cheap ass 55mm. no hate i'm just pissed i got this for christmas when i have a perfectly fine one.
@Uncompelable You should be grateful for whatever you got for Christmas some people don't even have clean water and you are complaining that you got a camera you didn't want? Your Mum and Dad or whoever went and spent that money on you and they didn't have to. You should appreciate whatever you get.
@xxshawnee3xx Omg seriously, the poor people have more of a social life and a life then us, do you realize how much this generation is wasting there life on Technology? Do you realize we aren't really lucky, we are just wasting life. Working every day, sleeping all night, on the internet inbetween, We connect more on facebook then in RL. IN fact i best every member of your family has there own technology they are attached to and on right now.
@Uncompelable Yeah I want to be a kid again, I miss the 90's so much when I didn't care about what was happening on Facebook or Twitter. Oh and I don't want this camera I was just on the video but if I got it for Christmas I would be grateful for it, I would be grateful for a packet of gum even though that isn't something I crave or whatever and this 'medical science' thing well is whatever that is possible to get someone? The point is you should appreciate anything you get because there is
@Uncompelable people without basic things. But about my family yeah I am addicted to the internet and I'm always on all day and night and my brothers have their Blackberry's and stuff but you are wrong about everyone because my Mum barely uses the laptop or whatever and my Dad never does he hates technology and personally I do too but I just can't give it up.
@xxshawnee3xx So yes, i am greatful. I am greatful that my life is wasting away on technology, that i can not breath fresh air and hunt for clean water. because if i do go out side i'd probably get robbed or bashed from the other "Lucky" people who live in my area.
I'd rather be a kid again, without technology, camera's or internet in my life. SO fuck that why should i be greatful? It's just plastic, don't waste your life on it. Once you drop it u realize you wasted your life on such a thing
@Uncompelable Are you not the doppelbieber? You seriously want to run around 'hunting' for clean water? That sucks man, I thought you'd be having fun roaming around whatever city you live in picking up girls and what not. I live in Sydney, if you don't want your lens I'll throw some cash up for it.
@xxshawnee3xx Don't waste your life wanting crap like this, infact i asked for nothing this christmas. And i'd be completely greatful WITH nothing. I'm just saying. I would appreciate things much more if they were something that i really needed. something i crave for, and i do have one thing, but only medical science can bring that to me. Not a peace of plastic and glass.
@Uncompelable haha am happy to take it of ur hands for £300 mate. its its for wildlife and sports. having the zoom makes it more useable than a frime 300/400mm 2.8
@Fogducker19 Had they made this lens a constant aperture, the price would have easily doubled. I was going to argue that for the price, you get 112-480mm out of an APS-C body and it's perfect for people who shoot wildlife. Bet then I remembered that you can get the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM for almost the exact same price and it's equivalent to 160-640mm on an APS-C body. They claim it's good for travel, but I would buy the lighter 70-200 f/4 L for that price.
is this worht getting for takking photos of surfing??? 70-200mm L USM F4 or could i get somthing like that will do the job??? or EF 70-200mm f2.8L USM ??? i want some 1 that can give me definite awners!! please help :)
@Superpui42 canon lenses do not fit nikon mounts only a lens made by nikon, or a third party company that makes lenses with nikon mounts. companies like tamron make alot of good lenses that can be bought with nikon mounts or canon mounts.
@Boodhunnilesh: with telephoto photography, especially at the apertures being shot at in this video, you need decently high shutter speeds (hence the higher ISO).
@coffieworld101 To take sharp images of course... Look at this lens aperture and focal length... Without a tripod / monopod, it will be a risk to take sharp images handheld with this lens...
@palimpalim53 if i were you, i'd take 70-200 F2.8 non-IS. if you have shaky hands and not confident without IS, go for 70-200 F4 IS. IMO, the only difference from this and the non L version is build and weathersealing, IQ-wise they're pretty similiar one and another.
All the numbers you said made no sense.... wtf is 1kg in lbs and 1000 pounds in dollars??? Not everyone who watches these know bother the Metric and English scales...
@ElfenLiedPhsycoFan Actually Metric is much simpler. Every thing is in Tens rather then the US customary/Imperial, which has the likes of 12in=1 foot or 3 foot=1yard. In the metric 1000mm=1 meter. 1000grams=kilogram. 10mm=1cm. It's much more simpler and easier.
@korp96 That is true, but the metric system is too precise for me XD I have no idea how many grams are in a pound or mm in an inch O.o too confusing for me >.> Like, if there isnt a whole number, I'm just gunna get to confused haha
@ElfenLiedPhsycoFan Oh well, your preference is your preference I guess. To answer your first question 1 kilo is about 2.3 pounds, which makes this lens a monster.
@teklegal A number of other L-series lenses extend too: 24-70, 24-105, 100-400. And having the lens extend keeps the size down for traveling and storage.
@TeenlovesJuri it's not 'bad', just not ideal for an 'L' lens. An aperture of 5.6 will mean that more of the image is in focus which isn't ideal for portraits when you want a blurred background. It also means that you'll need to use slower shutter speeds to get a decent exposure because of the smaller aperture which lets in less light - which also isn't ideal for low-light photography. It's still a great lens for the price, ideal for travel photography, but not as useful as a constant f4 or f2.8
Im looking to shoot short films, and i dont know wether to buy a nikon d5100 or a canon 550, please advice me to which one is best for me, and if you say Canon, which can is the best for films, thanks
Great review and very interesting video not as boring as many others in here. It must be understood that this is a zoom f4.0-5.6 and cost much much less than prime lenses. It is also much lighter and shorter than primes of the same reach. In comparison with the other two standard 70-300, the quality and sharpness is much better with this lens.
Don't get into the hype, only buy the lens that meets your needs and your expense allowance. It's more enjoyable when you have less to fret over.
it's here...oh yeah....it's flamiiiingoooo time!
littlekidwithdahat 2 days ago
1:09 OOHHH I think he is having a poo!!
Bamseskutt 1 week ago
Why the crap do you always shoot at such a high ISO?
TheDoctorCHCH 1 week ago
@TheDoctorCHCH maybe for faster shutter speed to reduce chance of blurring...that's a telephoto lens
dreamhtc 6 days ago
i think people are pished off at uncompelable. time to search for what he seid lol
mckay4 1 week ago
what camera does kai carry
shawngao777 1 week ago
@shawngao777 550d
MRmaterolo 1 week ago
Nikon strap on a Canon.....
doran1212 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
supreese 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
supreese 2 weeks ago
Beast of a lense! totally love it! :D
epicspawntime 3 weeks ago
ISO1600 on a 550... NOooooooO!
Voxnulla 1 month ago
FOUND IT......Uncompelable comment on page 5
HDCRdrummer 1 month ago 2
@HDCRdrummer thank you :) lol
mckay4 1 week ago
@HDCRdrummer now on page 6-7
mckay4 1 week ago
thumbs up for this video, but i don't like the aperture at this lenses
... ... by the way! Does anyones knows the name of the song starts at 3:22?
I think thats the same song like in the original canon lense videos!
:D
<German :D
iTrace9 1 month ago
seeing him use that over the water makes me nervous in my computer chair all the way over here
BOSTONIKON 1 month ago
For fuck sake, now i have to search for Uncompelable comment >:C
Freshfleshtilldeath 1 month ago 11
@Freshfleshtilldeath View all comments > ctrl+f > type Uncompelable
zombieX111222333 1 month ago
iPhoto slideshow song.....
TheSambond007 1 month ago
@TheSambond007
they use porn song too.. this is what digitalrev is.
kiransankarpati 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nikon really makes GooD.....Straps! :-)
pepckat 1 month ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Nikon really makes GooD.....Straps! :-)
pepckat 1 month ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Nikon strap on a Canon? 6:30
eliopoulos97 1 month ago
well done, nice to see you, regards from Russia
arzy2008 1 month ago
You think which is better EF70-300F4-5.6L or EF70-200F4L?
seiryu8810 1 month ago
Funny enough about the "easier to travel part", I have a Lowepro slingshot 202 aw and the bag fits all my gear perfectly with the 70-300 but if i had a 70-200 with all their internal zooming, it wouldnt be able to fit at all. The other thing i wanted to mention was even with the aperture being relatively small, the IS does serious work and lets me get blur free images at incredibly slow shutter speeds.
TrevenxD 1 month ago
Comment removed
Dansshortclips 1 month ago
Thanks for the video! I love photography! Check out my Canon 60D videos on my channel if you have nothing better to do with your time. :-)
TheFamilyguy421 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
where's Alamby?
nata911 1 month ago
nikon strap ^___^
imjaeh 1 month ago 2
Like the nikon Strap
ArturCCLima 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews 3
the coulours seem totally poor and dont have any contrast :/ not a good lense at all
furzflamme 2 months ago
@furzflamme .... i can't believe you sad that
TestMyDroid 2 months ago
@TestMyDroid just look 1:42 , 2:10 3:39 .no contrast at all. so you need to photoshop all pictures
furzflamme 2 months ago
@furzflamme thats all camera settings
TestMyDroid 2 months ago
@TestMyDroid not sure about that but may be
furzflamme 2 months ago
@furzflamme well idk the lens captures the collors great
TestMyDroid 2 months ago
@TestMyDroid ok
furzflamme 2 months ago
@furzflamme those washed out colors are a result of the camera body. he is using a 550D
1337mango 1 month ago
@1337mango ??? I am not sure why you say that about the 550D - it really should not make too much a difference in color.
Johnnyprc 1 month ago
F/4-5.6! How can you call that an L lens?!?! >:(
SmellsLikeUpDawgg 2 months ago
@SmellsLikeUpDawgg The 100-400L is f/4.5-5.6 so this is a improvement. Plus, Canon already has 300 f/4L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS which are rather expensive but those are primes. If they would make a 70-300 f/2.8L it would be a big lens, distorted at 300mm most likely and with a big price tag! I find the 70-300L lacks some contrast though.
PhotographerJan 2 months ago
Damnit Kai, you make me really fucking nervous when you don't use a neck strap while handling expensive equipment! Especially when you dangle it over a railing above water. Wear a neck strap for the love of god.
KitFireburn 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
ma non ti vergogni con una 5d mkII a mettere una corda della nikon!!!!!!!!vai a zappare la terra contadino!!!!
Scarantino76 2 months ago
how the name of the song?
lgabriel83 2 months ago
WOOOw
TileySmileify 2 months ago
why do you all keep wanting this freakn lens? I got it today for christmas, it's fucking heavy, it looks fucking rediculous around your neck on your canon, you'll get a sore back/neck/arm holding it all day or w.e. Plus you have to be like 10 meters away from something for it to focus and take a picture, i much prefer y cheap ass 55mm. no hate i'm just pissed i got this for christmas when i have a perfectly fine one.
Uncompelable 2 months ago
@Uncompelable You should be grateful for whatever you got for Christmas some people don't even have clean water and you are complaining that you got a camera you didn't want? Your Mum and Dad or whoever went and spent that money on you and they didn't have to. You should appreciate whatever you get.
xxshawnee3xx 2 months ago 55
@xxshawnee3xx Omg seriously, the poor people have more of a social life and a life then us, do you realize how much this generation is wasting there life on Technology? Do you realize we aren't really lucky, we are just wasting life. Working every day, sleeping all night, on the internet inbetween, We connect more on facebook then in RL. IN fact i best every member of your family has there own technology they are attached to and on right now.
Uncompelable 2 months ago
@Uncompelable Yeah I want to be a kid again, I miss the 90's so much when I didn't care about what was happening on Facebook or Twitter. Oh and I don't want this camera I was just on the video but if I got it for Christmas I would be grateful for it, I would be grateful for a packet of gum even though that isn't something I crave or whatever and this 'medical science' thing well is whatever that is possible to get someone? The point is you should appreciate anything you get because there is
xxshawnee3xx 2 months ago
@Uncompelable people without basic things. But about my family yeah I am addicted to the internet and I'm always on all day and night and my brothers have their Blackberry's and stuff but you are wrong about everyone because my Mum barely uses the laptop or whatever and my Dad never does he hates technology and personally I do too but I just can't give it up.
xxshawnee3xx 2 months ago
@xxshawnee3xx So yes, i am greatful. I am greatful that my life is wasting away on technology, that i can not breath fresh air and hunt for clean water. because if i do go out side i'd probably get robbed or bashed from the other "Lucky" people who live in my area.
I'd rather be a kid again, without technology, camera's or internet in my life. SO fuck that why should i be greatful? It's just plastic, don't waste your life on it. Once you drop it u realize you wasted your life on such a thing
Uncompelable 2 months ago
@Uncompelable Are you not the doppelbieber? You seriously want to run around 'hunting' for clean water? That sucks man, I thought you'd be having fun roaming around whatever city you live in picking up girls and what not. I live in Sydney, if you don't want your lens I'll throw some cash up for it.
R0WMaC 2 months ago
@xxshawnee3xx Don't waste your life wanting crap like this, infact i asked for nothing this christmas. And i'd be completely greatful WITH nothing. I'm just saying. I would appreciate things much more if they were something that i really needed. something i crave for, and i do have one thing, but only medical science can bring that to me. Not a peace of plastic and glass.
Uncompelable 2 months ago
@Uncompelable woah jamie, if you dont want that. just give it to me :( that's my dream to have that thing T_T
Deandre16able 2 months ago 2
@Uncompelable ooooooh... youre stupid...
communist17mex 1 month ago
@Uncompelable learn to appreaciate things kiddo :)
Deandre16able 2 months ago
@Uncompelable if you wanna give it away, you know where to find me :)
BULLHORNpictures 1 month ago
@Uncompelable ungrateful dick
778dylansmith 1 month ago
@Uncompelable fucking ungrateful rich spoiled bastard
AQHackAQ 3 weeks ago
@Uncompelable Your a fucking ungrateful retard attempting to force logic onto others with your shitty ass attempt at some wise sayings
Why the fuck are you on YouTube if you think technology is negatively affecting us? Why do you have a "cheap ass" 55mm lens?
You get something awesome for free on Christmas that causes you to get pissed.
Maybe you'll be happier if you get hit in the head.
People, especially the poor, learn to appreciate what they get, unlike you, cunt.
dan007iel 1 week ago
@Uncompelable haha am happy to take it of ur hands for £300 mate. its its for wildlife and sports. having the zoom makes it more useable than a frime 300/400mm 2.8
mckay4 1 week ago
when u say pink tits, u sound like Moss from the IT crowd...bitch
armarni123 2 months ago
Man falling asleep on a bench. Isn't really a rare species.
iOtameganeKun 2 months ago
Which is better, the 70 - 200mm or this?
iOtameganeKun 2 months ago
dis guy is funny but dis is a great lens, do dey hav it in blacc
pocketzphat 2 months ago
@pocketzphat Y doez u type lyk dis? Really is it that much effort to use proper grammar?
xxshawnee3xx 2 months ago
perchè i commenti in casa ITALIA,sono tutti in lingua INGLESE? io non ci capisco assolutamente niente punto.
gvolpe100 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Is there's a trouble with the lens / camera used in this video ?
The image looks somehow foggy...
Boeingloverzz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you guys should compare this lense to the 550 dollar 70-300mm version and the 130 dollar 75-300mm version! please!!
TheVjay86 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
3:10 for some tits
XxxCaryNeoxxX 2 months ago
Awesome Lens but not liking the Colour of it ! yeah am being gay or whatever but it just don't match with the Cam Body !!!
MadStylezuk 2 months ago
he always acts like he really doesnt give a damn about all of the gear
xSimmsStudiosx 2 months ago
Great Vid :) Thx for sharing!
But I still think the only thing missing, to make your reviews perfect, is the VIDEO PERFORMANCES of the lenses & cameras
iloveairfrance 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews 22
When will you review the Pentax DA* 60-250 f4. Pls do review other brand too, not only dominated w/ Canon & Nikon brands
nrimo 2 months ago
3:10 - Tits, pink tits! gimme some pink tits :D
lol he's so pervert sometimes...
martinsbanaks12 2 months ago
what lowerpro is that? help please thank you
ivfmcclove 2 months ago in playlist More videos from DigitalRevCom
'i can see right up a birds backside'.. nice.. I want this camera!;)
DANBMX0071 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
glad you use, cheaper body now, not the usual 5D mark mark :))
olegnabunyi 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Dont get why Canon made this.... should be at least a constant f/4.5 to be L class.
Fogducker19 2 months ago
@Fogducker19 Had they made this lens a constant aperture, the price would have easily doubled. I was going to argue that for the price, you get 112-480mm out of an APS-C body and it's perfect for people who shoot wildlife. Bet then I remembered that you can get the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM for almost the exact same price and it's equivalent to 160-640mm on an APS-C body. They claim it's good for travel, but I would buy the lighter 70-200 f/4 L for that price.
rochat 2 months ago
which should i buy, this lens or the 70-200 f4 is
Brandonmaieli 3 months ago
@Brandonmaieli
this for the longer 100mm of course
lhlee888 2 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Is it bad that I wanted to see that kid fall?
OnBurningPaperWings 3 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
Alan partridge?
jaydmhearne 3 months ago
Is this the T2i? North America
jjse2450 3 months ago
6:36, the awkward moment when your reviewing a canon lens on a canon body and you have a nikon neckstrap :D
nerdapedia 3 months ago
Were is that place? Looks so nice and peaceful i wanna live there..
cupiiid 3 months ago
Why is there still pixelation in the grey background graphics in 1080p ?
ImperialPimp 3 months ago
@ImperialPimp Youtube quality
MaSSiVe0101 3 months ago
Built to last a nuclear blast... or your DIY skills. NIYAHAHAHA.
CarlulousEE 3 months ago
thx 4 this awesome documentation :-D
BarBQ88 3 months ago
1.6 crop sensor = 112 to 410mm focal length.
morloff 3 months ago
This video is bloody crazy mate! You certainly are pucker of turtle swine!
MrMfloor 3 months ago
Comment removed
97purna 3 months ago
I love how he call birds, Tits!
Deltad 3 months ago
Bloody ugly lense compared to 70-200 4 or 2.8 L
yeahyoung 3 months ago in playlist More videos from DigitalRevCom
this fits on a 550d right?
helmetboy45 3 months ago
@helmetboy45
Yes, EF lenses fit on the 550d , This is the L series so ya
But EF-S lenses do not fit on full frame sensor
odin2free 3 months ago
@helmetboy45 he was using a 550d in this vid!!
97purna 3 months ago
EF 70-300mm 4.0 - 5.6 v Tammy 70-300 4.0-6.3 :D
VDroid711 4 months ago
Is this in Hong Kong?
Peiselkopp 4 months ago
@Peiselkopp probably. seeing as he's an asian man with an english accent.
Demosthenes409 4 months ago
@Demosthenes409 Hum... I wonder where in Hong Kong this is... some Kowloon Park maybe...
Peiselkopp 4 months ago
he switched cameras...
padilsa000 4 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
is this worht getting for takking photos of surfing??? 70-200mm L USM F4 or could i get somthing like that will do the job??? or EF 70-200mm f2.8L USM ??? i want some 1 that can give me definite awners!! please help :)
mirror687 4 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
What would anyone suggest for a rookie needing a good zoom on a low budget? The cheap version of this^? I want to get a 18-135mm, plus a zoom.
Skatrav 4 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
That is awesome!
CamaraMountClamp 4 months ago
maybe a bit dumb question but does a canon lense or any other lense fit on a nikon?
Superpui42 4 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von DigitalRevCom
@Superpui42 canon lenses do not fit nikon mounts only a lens made by nikon, or a third party company that makes lenses with nikon mounts. companies like tamron make alot of good lenses that can be bought with nikon mounts or canon mounts.
pootinhammer 4 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
@pootinhammer thx... finally found one made by tamron.
Superpui42 4 months ago
@Superpui42 The Canon lenses do not fit in a Nikon body.
theproversion 4 months ago
the f/4 - f/5.6 is a design decision likely to keep the size/ mass down to keep it "travel friendly-ish". trade-offs, as usual...
sdijnfpo0jaisf 4 months ago
Plese compare the 70-300mm Canon (non l) and Tamron
aiptekc100 4 months ago
What camera bag is kai using in this video?!
ddandydon 4 months ago
ISO 1600 during the day ?? even at night i rarely go beyond 800
Boodhunnilesh 4 months ago
@Boodhunnilesh: with telephoto photography, especially at the apertures being shot at in this video, you need decently high shutter speeds (hence the higher ISO).
sdijnfpo0jaisf 4 months ago
DigitalRevCom whats the best Lens and Filter Cap to use for taking landscape photos of sunsets and sunrise?
Cheers
MadStylezuk 5 months ago
Comment removed
MadStylezuk 5 months ago
Why do u take pics at such a high ISO?
coffieworld101 5 months ago 11
@coffieworld101 To take sharp images of course... Look at this lens aperture and focal length... Without a tripod / monopod, it will be a risk to take sharp images handheld with this lens...
Boeingloverzz 2 months ago
@coffieworld101 that's the downfall of f4-5.6 glass...might as well get the 70-200 2.8
0SKBooth0 2 months ago
@coffieworld101 look at the 1st shot.. if he stopped stopped down further there would be motion blur and hand shaking.
minutes2midnite 2 months ago
@coffieworld101 Maybe you didin't watch the end, but he explains why he used a high ISO
optikalefxx 2 months ago
@coffieworld101 most slow speed lenses need high ISO to get a fast shutter speed.
1986Chaitanya 2 months ago
Please shorten the intro!! Nice, vid, though! :)
IrvingsCreations 5 months ago
The difference of the non L lens is how they make the lens and i think the L lens it is more wide angle
x5k1LL3r 5 months ago
@x5k1LL3r No, same field of view.
TheCameraStoreTV 5 months ago
@TheCameraStoreTV Haha sorry Im just a 13yro :D
x5k1LL3r 5 months ago
Why the fuck thi guy usually put the nikon belt on the Canon?
It sucks
Bistocracy 5 months ago
@Bistocracy Why is your spelling piss poor? It's Kai. It's what he does. Why can't he be original?
killianUDOWN 5 months ago
@killianUDOWN I really dont' think he is original, the messege in my opinion is "Canon sucks so I put the nikon belt"
Bistocracy 5 months ago
straight out the camera I don't see any stunning photos here. For the price of this lens there should be some stellar examples of photos.
jambandz 5 months ago
LOL! There is bird's shit on his jacket at 3:19
Awesome review guys!
OskRamos 5 months ago
Hm witch Lens shoud i buy? This One or the 70-200 F4 IS?
But you make very very good movies ! Thats good
palimpalim53 5 months ago
@palimpalim53 if i were you, i'd take 70-200 F2.8 non-IS. if you have shaky hands and not confident without IS, go for 70-200 F4 IS. IMO, the only difference from this and the non L version is build and weathersealing, IQ-wise they're pretty similiar one and another.
bekk16 5 months ago
@bekk16 all Canon 70-200mm lenses are L
DrAntcom 5 months ago
@DrAntcom i mean the only difference from 70-300 L (this) and the non L version. of course all Canon EF 70-200 are L lenses.
bekk16 5 months ago
@DrAntcom i mean the only difference from 70-300 L (this) and the non L version. of course all Canon EF 70-200 are L lenses.
bekk16 5 months ago
That lens worth like a car
carlusdarienus 5 months ago
why so high iso? it is not bad???
baumdelakuh 5 months ago
please put the lanyard of your camera D:
555555555555paul5555 5 months ago
you guys should compare this lense to the 550 dollar 70-300mm version and the 130 dollar 75-300mm version! please!!
ChrisCasaceli64 6 months ago 117
@ChrisCasaceli64 I am going to buy 70-300 because the image stabilizer
just for dath it worths te extra buck
LikeAcefighter 3 months ago
@ChrisCasaceli64 There's almost no comparison because the $130 is absolute crap IMO.
kylerose1990 2 months ago
I like the Nikon-lanyard on his Canon :D
Lutchaaa 6 months ago 27
not for me
vincentjanse 6 months ago
@IproLegendHDz Yeah, but a constant f4 would make this lens about 3 times as big and heavy, and cost a lot more.
shponglefan 6 months ago
All the numbers you said made no sense.... wtf is 1kg in lbs and 1000 pounds in dollars??? Not everyone who watches these know bother the Metric and English scales...
ElfenLiedPhsycoFan 6 months ago
@ElfenLiedPhsycoFan It's not his fault that Americans stick to their weird measuring units ;)
meta1storm 6 months ago 2
@meta1storm But it's simple =P
ElfenLiedPhsycoFan 6 months ago
@ElfenLiedPhsycoFan Actually Metric is much simpler. Every thing is in Tens rather then the US customary/Imperial, which has the likes of 12in=1 foot or 3 foot=1yard. In the metric 1000mm=1 meter. 1000grams=kilogram. 10mm=1cm. It's much more simpler and easier.
korp96 6 months ago
@korp96 That is true, but the metric system is too precise for me XD I have no idea how many grams are in a pound or mm in an inch O.o too confusing for me >.> Like, if there isnt a whole number, I'm just gunna get to confused haha
ElfenLiedPhsycoFan 6 months ago
Comment removed
korp96 6 months ago
@korp96 Ahh gotchya XD Thanks =]
ElfenLiedPhsycoFan 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ElfenLiedPhsycoFan Oh well, your preference is your preference I guess. To answer your first question 1 kilo is about 2.3 pounds, which makes this lens a monster.
korp96 6 months ago
"Tits! Pink tits! Give some pink tits!" XD
jardorocks 6 months ago 2
L lens and the front extends? No thanks. I'd rather use the 70-200mm which doesn't.
teklegal 6 months ago
@teklegal A number of other L-series lenses extend too: 24-70, 24-105, 100-400. And having the lens extend keeps the size down for traveling and storage.
shponglefan 6 months ago
I am a starter in photography, can someone plz tell me why f/4- 5.6 is bad for this lens?
Thanks :)
TeenlovesJuri 6 months ago
@TeenlovesJuri it's not 'bad', just not ideal for an 'L' lens. An aperture of 5.6 will mean that more of the image is in focus which isn't ideal for portraits when you want a blurred background. It also means that you'll need to use slower shutter speeds to get a decent exposure because of the smaller aperture which lets in less light - which also isn't ideal for low-light photography. It's still a great lens for the price, ideal for travel photography, but not as useful as a constant f4 or f2.8
biliousfrog 6 months ago
@TeenlovesJuri because the aperture is very limited for the price you pay
FragNetQc 6 months ago
Im looking to shoot short films, and i dont know wether to buy a nikon d5100 or a canon 550, please advice me to which one is best for me, and if you say Canon, which can is the best for films, thanks
kam717 6 months ago
@kam717 Canon....5DMKII
teklegal 6 months ago
He's using a Nikon strap
theBrysonLeo 6 months ago
wow the shots with this lens look amazing!
DisIsHowiRoll 6 months ago
OW! THAT'S SHOTGUN! HAHAHA
zabryna25 6 months ago
Swatch watch hey...Go Tag Heuer instead.
Iced0Doughnut 6 months ago
lol
bereza36 6 months ago
Great review and very interesting video not as boring as many others in here. It must be understood that this is a zoom f4.0-5.6 and cost much much less than prime lenses. It is also much lighter and shorter than primes of the same reach. In comparison with the other two standard 70-300, the quality and sharpness is much better with this lens.
Don't get into the hype, only buy the lens that meets your needs and your expense allowance. It's more enjoyable when you have less to fret over.
Aramis828 7 months ago
i guess thats what i get for commenting before watching
0SKBooth0 7 months ago