everyone is knocking on this process but it really is more efficient than fossil fuels and a hell of a lot cleaner. you use rechargeable batteries to provide the electricity to power the generator, attach it to maybe solar panels on the car or at a recharge station at home, that's just one of many ways to make this easy, free and efficient, come on people, think a little bit harder...
listen... yes, it's good to be able to have a gas like that, but it won't solve our fossil fuel dependency because it takes fossil fuel energy to convert the water to HHO gas in the first place through their electrolysis process, which is energy intensive. Unless the company designed a net efficient way to produce HHO gas, which I highly doubt. By the way, if anyone can share with me more about HHO gas, such as it's molecular structure and how it differs from H2O, please reply or inbox me. ty
This is not his invention. Have you ever wondered why is the oder name of this gas Brown's Gas. This gas is Yull Brown's invention he's Bulgarian by the way.
This is not his invention. Have you ever wondered why is the oder name of this gas Brown's Gas. This gas is Brown's invention he's Bulgarian by the way.
psh yea ofcourse the governments #1 priority is to make this free energy available for the US army but they forget about the american people who are paying these ridiculous gas prices, GO U.S.A !
hmm, wasnt aware james randi had the challenge as well. I am a huge fan of randi and would love to see someone claim his prize since no psychics or anyone with super natural powers has taken it in decades lol
quite possibly because the people offering the money conveniently suspended their challenge. They have 5 people on the waiting list to prove them wrong. Their excuse for suspending the challenge is the "economy" If you are so SURE no one will be able to prove you wrong and you have people waiting to show you, why suspend it? Sounds like a cheap cop out to me. If you have 1mil to toss away, this economy isn't hurting you too bad..prob just some oil execs spreading hoax propaganda
there is no chemical reaction here. witch means water turned to gas is no differnt than water itself. now catch up to canada we supply most of canada and some USA states with clean reuseable energy. so dont let oil companies control you. yes the tech is not quite there but will be soon when more and more people start to play and build this go back to your basements and be usless somemore
guess what man there needs not to be any coal burnt a simple solar panel or just as simple as an lemon can create this gas. and an alternater once turning can create this as well ever started a car hmmm simple minds. electrical school buddy learn some math and save the world
I cant believe i share a planet with some of you people. First of all, learn conservation of energy. that would go a hell of a long way.
Then a significant portion of you viewers would understand that HHO fuel's energy comes from somewhere, and a majority of the time, that machine is going to be running off electricity produced by dirty coal. So we are turning coal into HHO gas energy indirectly and inefficiently.
Well if a car is running 100miles at 0,4litr. water + 0,4ltr.petrol. but without the system is using 8 ltr petrol. means the system has saved you 7,6 ltr petrol. for every 100 miles! :) That is what I am saving, and I can just reccomend it to others too ! :)
Top Gun Man is right, this does NOT save energy, it wastes more.
If you're going to plug something in, make it a rechargeable car....again, using the electricity for anything besides directly charging a battery wastes more, it cannot save.
BUT, gas (petrol) car engines are more efficient than using electricity too.
@rorkimaru because burning oil is 100% efficient? I don't think the laws of thermodynamics allow anything to be 100% efficient. Reality has a way of imposing its self on things. Clearly enough energy can be produced to move a car, which is quite a bit. He probably uses a pony motor in the back to make electricity to run the hho machine. A small half liter 2 cycle engine is better on the environment than a 2 liter 4 cylinder or bigger engine.
@Renard37678 Of course it's not. Look, I wrote that comment 2 years ago but I think the point I was trying to make is that energy is used in making the fuel, energy that most likely comes from fossil fuels so it's pseudo-environmental.
Also, the video was uploaded over 4 years ago. If this was a viable fuel source then we'd have heard a bit more about it since then.
@rorkimaru I understand, I just wanted a clarification. I think pseudo environmental is a bit of a leap. Would you call hybrid cars pseudo environmental? It seems like it's pretty much the same idea, small motor charges a battery, small motor makes hho gas, I have a hard time seeing the difference.
As to hearing something about it by now, I am pretty sure the oil industries killed this one like they killed the electric car.
@Renard37678 I would very much call many hybrids pseudo environmenal, especially the original ones like the Prias. A car doesn't need to be that size and if it is it won't be environmentally friendly.
Certain aspects of electric cars are interesting and they are a step forward but people often ignore the electricity source, they are not as green as they are implied to be. Also, the way I see it limits on battery technology and people's egos is what holds back the electric car.
ah yes and please read your old school books before posting hilarious stuff like "amazing" or "wow how cool.."
burning hydrogen is just silly if you want a system which can run a little efficient. if you want max power (for a rocket engine f.e.) hydrogen burning is ok ;)
btw if you would use those solar panels it would be way more efficient to directly power electromotors on every wheel, because no internal-combustion engine has the energy effectiveness of an electromotor.
when using hydrogen, a fuel cell is many times better than just dumb burning the gas.
Everyone needs to learn about hydrocell technology. Water can be turned in to HHO gas and used to fuel our cars, homes, business and everything else that requires electricity. It is called electrolysis and it done by passing DC current through water and creates hydrogen bubbles that are combustable. I have built a hydrocell and am installing it in my car. I have so far only made a torch out of it but I have seen enough evidence to say that this technology is real and can work.
what the hell are u talking about the hho gas runs into your intake then goes to your cumbustion chambers it doesn't run off the electricity it runs off the gas
i think im missing something. ok so, how the heck does that flame feel "only warm to the touch" when it glows up a brass ball? and that other part when the water is condensing... why doesnt it melt the glass or whatever
This is great but given the number of energy consumers there will always be relativly high prices associated with energy.if the HHO from water is burned how would it turn back into H2O?
You answered your own question. HHO is just water that has a bit of a twang to it to make it different than water, but it's very unstable. You heat it up it and it burns into water. You dont see it anywhere near the flame obviously because it's evaporated.
The problem that makes this technology is that it still requires you to burn the hell out of fossil fuels in order to create the electricity(all be it cheaper becuase of the price of coal)... it's just cleaner for the work environment.
In the comments of the video called "HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)" there is a link to a HHO community website that needs people with experience in HHO technology.
This kind of technology has been around for quite some time, IE a portable welder/gas torch unit called Microweld which converts distilled water via an electro current.
I have also been working on a similar system that uses rain water and biocarbontes, which is heated using the heat from a C A T, the real time fuel savings are immense,
Water is the most abundant resource on the planet. The only people who think we will ever have problems with water are youtubers. The problem may lie in economics, or politics, but certainly not the lack of water resources... this stuff can run on rain water..
This initiative needs a central location to discuss ideas! Come join the new forum at hhoforums dot com! It's much more useful to have everyone discussing in the same forum instead of youtube!
Very Awesome! This would not be on Fox news if it was a farce. It's basic chemistry. H20 broken down = hydrogen + hydrogen + oxygen. For many years chemists have known it is possible to break down water into the two basic molecules with electricity. This is very ingenious, and I'm glad to see it is being brought to the forefront. To all the skeptics out there, once it was also believed that the world was flat! What group do you fall into. The smart ones? Or the __________? fill in the blank.
so... what happens when we convert all the water to energy? or..... considering the amount of contamination in the current water supply, only say 1/4 of it?
I actually witnessed something. pulling out of a parking lot, I saw a Prius with a sticker that said "clean special fuel"
We were behind it until we had to pull over for gas. then when we left and went down the road, the Prius had been totalled, wrecked, and flipped over, hit by some viper or something.
Coincidence? Or big oil hard at work? They mean to stop the electric and gas-less cars. by any means necessary.
The Water car comes under the banner of UFO'S, Aliens, and The perfect woman thoery. They dont exist except in the minds of the coach potato hopefuls. Keep on dreaming for you pefect world and keep on waiting. :)
Hydrogen is only a source of energy if it can be taken in its pure form and reacted with another chemical, such as oxygen. But all the hydrogen on Earth, except that in hydrocarbons, has already been oxidized, so none of it is available as fuel. The only way to get free hydrogen on Earth is to make it. The trouble is that making hydrogen requires more energy than the hydrogen so produced can provide.
Hydrogen distracts attention from the real and immediate potential of electric vehicles to an unlikely future possibility embraced by automakers, oil companies and a pro-business administration in order to buy time and profits for the status quo. Hydrogen is actually made by reforming hydrocarbons, its use as fuel would not reduce greenhouse gas emissions at all. In fact, it would greatly increase them.
Let's say you wanted to produce hydrogen. You choose to do it via steam reformation of natural gas, the most common technique used commercially today. The reaction is:
As the positive enthalpy change indicates, the reaction is endothermic (that is, heat-absorbing) and will need an outside source of energy to drive it forward. This can be obtained by burning some methane, which releases 205 kcal/mole, via the following reaction:
Assuming an optimistic 72 percent efficiency in using the combustion energy to drive the steam reformation, this would allow us to reform 2.5 moles of methane for every one that we burn (or 5 for every 2). So if we take five units of reaction (1) and add it to two units of reaction (2), the net reaction becomes:
As far as usable fuel is concerned, what we have managed to do is trade seven moles of methane for twenty moles of hydrogen. Seven moles of carbon dioxide have also been produced, exactly as many as would have been produced had we simply used the methane itself as fuel.
The seven moles of methane that we used up, however, would have been worth 1435 kilocalories of energy if used directly, while the twenty moles of hydrogen we have produced in exchange for all our trouble are only worth 1320 kilocalories. So for the same amount of carbon dioxide released, less useful energy has been produced.
@HAL11000 do you ever stop to think of where electricity comes from? if we charge every vehicle on earth from our wall sockets or however this power is delived to our car, where does that power come from? FOSSIL FUELS burned at generator stations. its a fuel shift. we save gasoline but our electricity demand skyrockets! most electricity today is produced by coal, oil, petroleum or nuclear power. unless you have a better way of producing electricity, were back to square one hey?
@nobebeselagua I'm aware of the percentage of Electricity generated from fossil fuels. Despite this, widespread use of EVs wont result in a self-defeating "fuel shift." Ever think of the amount of energy required to drill, pump, refine, transport and refuel our gas cars? It's far beyond the energy requirements for an EV. Also, electricity demand won't necessarily "sky rocket," since most charging would occur at night; when power demand is the lowest and electricity the cheapest.
@HAL11000 Yea, but even if we converted half of the USA's vehicles to electricity, we would still have 125 MILLION vehicles charging at night. I believe the demand would skyrocket and electricity would get much more expensive. Its a supply and demand world, why do you think gas prices go up during high traffic seasons like summer break and christmas? once the world is dependent on electricity, that will go up too. mark my words.
@nobebeselagua That's quite a long way into the future. Higher nighttime demand, indeed, but I’d imagine by then a higher percentage of renewable energy mixed into the grid; as wind power’s usually stronger at night. Halving the oil industry’s power demand would save much energy, too. Electricity can be generated from many different sources, such as heat from the earth, light from the sun, and waves and tides from the sea. For example, my 4 kW Solar system greatly lowers my electric bill.
I say the American people sues exon and all the big oil companies for every penny there worth. The American people have gone on too far under there tyrany.
there was another guy who developed this in the early 90's, and used it to develop a water powered V8. He died shortly thereafter. cause of death: poisoning.
everyone is knocking on this process but it really is more efficient than fossil fuels and a hell of a lot cleaner. you use rechargeable batteries to provide the electricity to power the generator, attach it to maybe solar panels on the car or at a recharge station at home, that's just one of many ways to make this easy, free and efficient, come on people, think a little bit harder...
magnumopusdedeus 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The solution is found in Stanley Meyer
watch?v=YGp7hMUXjmI
watch?v=a74uarqap2E
watch?v=SRE8ghD9Ee0
Sorry folks he died of food poising
eclipseven7 4 days ago
It's been more than 5 years. Where are the water powered cars.
LOL, the guy is a rube.
dlhitch2007 3 weeks ago
listen... yes, it's good to be able to have a gas like that, but it won't solve our fossil fuel dependency because it takes fossil fuel energy to convert the water to HHO gas in the first place through their electrolysis process, which is energy intensive. Unless the company designed a net efficient way to produce HHO gas, which I highly doubt. By the way, if anyone can share with me more about HHO gas, such as it's molecular structure and how it differs from H2O, please reply or inbox me. ty
hman9981 4 weeks ago
they got a gas oven out now
alienhddna 5 months ago
Check out Stan Meyer's water powered car too! Humanity will be freed soon now.
Camyum 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not his invention. Have you ever wondered why is the oder name of this gas Brown's Gas. This gas is Yull Brown's invention he's Bulgarian by the way.
kokoshka92 1 year ago
This is not his invention. Have you ever wondered why is the oder name of this gas Brown's Gas. This gas is Brown's invention he's Bulgarian by the way.
kokoshka92 1 year ago
I am TR Knudtson, The developer of Solar Steels, Hydroxy and father of Electro Chemical plasmas (ECP) 1967
If you have any questions on Hydroxy 1967 or Browns gas 1977, William Rhodes (Rhodes Gas) 1962,,, I will be glad to help you learn more.
All the best
Knute
TR Knudtson
OldKnute 1 year ago
so its hydrogen gas
MrHamster24 1 year ago
@MrHamster24 no it isn't. It is oxyhydrogen gas. Learn the difference,
organisten 1 year ago
psh yea ofcourse the governments #1 priority is to make this free energy available for the US army but they forget about the american people who are paying these ridiculous gas prices, GO U.S.A !
MrTravisStone 2 years ago
as long as u can kill with it, military will sponsor
911 inside job !
HoughMorris 2 years ago
hmm, wasnt aware james randi had the challenge as well. I am a huge fan of randi and would love to see someone claim his prize since no psychics or anyone with super natural powers has taken it in decades lol
p00j2620 2 years ago
Does HHO increase Gas Mileage ? Can you prove it ?
If you can it is worth $1,000,000.00
Watch this video for details..... v=8zX2pHg-2_I&NR=1
Why has no one claimed this $1,000,000.00 ?
Think about that before you waste your money on HHO junk.
noimw 2 years ago
quite possibly because the people offering the money conveniently suspended their challenge. They have 5 people on the waiting list to prove them wrong. Their excuse for suspending the challenge is the "economy" If you are so SURE no one will be able to prove you wrong and you have people waiting to show you, why suspend it? Sounds like a cheap cop out to me. If you have 1mil to toss away, this economy isn't hurting you too bad..prob just some oil execs spreading hoax propaganda
p00j2620 2 years ago
p00j2620 said, "conveniently suspended their challenge."
That is a different $1,000.000. challenge than the one I was talking about.
James Randi has a different $1,000,000. challenge if HHO can be proven
to increase MPG by 25% or more. But
James Randi is not stupid, he knows there are ways for people to cheat.
So there is a $5,000. fee for a University to thoroughly check the vehicle
and do proper test for MPG.
It don't matter, even hho peddlers are not stupid enough to have it tested.
noimw 2 years ago
there is no chemical reaction here. witch means water turned to gas is no differnt than water itself. now catch up to canada we supply most of canada and some USA states with clean reuseable energy. so dont let oil companies control you. yes the tech is not quite there but will be soon when more and more people start to play and build this go back to your basements and be usless somemore
brendonlpiche 3 years ago
guess what man there needs not to be any coal burnt a simple solar panel or just as simple as an lemon can create this gas. and an alternater once turning can create this as well ever started a car hmmm simple minds. electrical school buddy learn some math and save the world
brendonlpiche 3 years ago
If a solar panel could catch enough energy to run a car, we'd just use it to charge the car directly.
blueshift5 2 years ago 2
I cant believe i share a planet with some of you people. First of all, learn conservation of energy. that would go a hell of a long way.
Then a significant portion of you viewers would understand that HHO fuel's energy comes from somewhere, and a majority of the time, that machine is going to be running off electricity produced by dirty coal. So we are turning coal into HHO gas energy indirectly and inefficiently.
TopGunMan 3 years ago
Well if a car is running 100miles at 0,4litr. water + 0,4ltr.petrol. but without the system is using 8 ltr petrol. means the system has saved you 7,6 ltr petrol. for every 100 miles! :) That is what I am saving, and I can just reccomend it to others too ! :)
vril5 2 years ago
except the amount of petrol used to produce an amount of hydrogen gas is substantial.
Here is two possibilities (energy maps of efficiencies) to get from petrol to car movement.
Petrol through engine -- (30% eff.)--> movement of car
Petrol through engine --(30%)--> alternator --(70%)--> electricity --(40%)--> HHO engine--(30%)--> movement of car
You end up with 2% of the petrol's energy going to car movement with HHO rather than 30% with petrol. A combo of the two is in between.
TopGunMan 2 years ago
Top Gun Man is right, this does NOT save energy, it wastes more.
If you're going to plug something in, make it a rechargeable car....again, using the electricity for anything besides directly charging a battery wastes more, it cannot save.
BUT, gas (petrol) car engines are more efficient than using electricity too.
blueshift5 2 years ago
Hotter than the surface of the sun? I don't think so.
ek205 3 years ago 11
@ek205 that's probably coz you can't think at all !!! man wake up ! stop talking bullshits and START READING !
spending time in internet wouldn't make you smart. in a contrary...
read books and one day (maybe) you'll see !
sahaja75 1 year ago
Lies and falsehood! I don't know about the blowtorch thing but as for a car fuel...
-it takes energy to make HHO from water.
-HHO gives out energy as it converts back to water
-you will never get this process 100% energy efficiant, some is lost therefore less energy is gained by burning than makeing
-If you got it 100% efficient only the energy used to make HHO could be returned (energy cant be made)
sorry, we still need our oil
rorkimaru 3 years ago 7
@rorkimaru because burning oil is 100% efficient? I don't think the laws of thermodynamics allow anything to be 100% efficient. Reality has a way of imposing its self on things. Clearly enough energy can be produced to move a car, which is quite a bit. He probably uses a pony motor in the back to make electricity to run the hho machine. A small half liter 2 cycle engine is better on the environment than a 2 liter 4 cylinder or bigger engine.
Renard37678 1 year ago
@Renard37678 Of course it's not. Look, I wrote that comment 2 years ago but I think the point I was trying to make is that energy is used in making the fuel, energy that most likely comes from fossil fuels so it's pseudo-environmental.
Also, the video was uploaded over 4 years ago. If this was a viable fuel source then we'd have heard a bit more about it since then.
rorkimaru 1 year ago
@rorkimaru I understand, I just wanted a clarification. I think pseudo environmental is a bit of a leap. Would you call hybrid cars pseudo environmental? It seems like it's pretty much the same idea, small motor charges a battery, small motor makes hho gas, I have a hard time seeing the difference.
As to hearing something about it by now, I am pretty sure the oil industries killed this one like they killed the electric car.
Renard37678 1 year ago
@Renard37678 I would very much call many hybrids pseudo environmenal, especially the original ones like the Prias. A car doesn't need to be that size and if it is it won't be environmentally friendly.
Certain aspects of electric cars are interesting and they are a step forward but people often ignore the electricity source, they are not as green as they are implied to be. Also, the way I see it limits on battery technology and people's egos is what holds back the electric car.
rorkimaru 1 year ago
@rorkimaru We'll just put HHO plants next to hydroelectric plants. Dumbass.
kcirtap09018 8 months ago
@kcirtap09018 Well I'm glad you've solved the energy crisis, alert Captain Planet, I'm sure he's got a medal for you.
rorkimaru 8 months ago
"(Luke Skywalker)
"I can't believe it!"
(Yoda)
"That is why you fail."
arqueware 3 years ago
ggf
glotter33 3 years ago
ah yes and please read your old school books before posting hilarious stuff like "amazing" or "wow how cool.."
burning hydrogen is just silly if you want a system which can run a little efficient. if you want max power (for a rocket engine f.e.) hydrogen burning is ok ;)
fabs0r1 3 years ago
btw if you would use those solar panels it would be way more efficient to directly power electromotors on every wheel, because no internal-combustion engine has the energy effectiveness of an electromotor.
when using hydrogen, a fuel cell is many times better than just dumb burning the gas.
fabs0r1 3 years ago
lordunderdog is absolutely right, production of h2 out of water needs energy (much more than you get by burning the hydrogen in return).
where does this energy come from inside a car powered by the the same water???
solar panels would be the only solution with a tiny bit of sense.
...just the 2 cents of a student of electrical engeneering.
fabs0r1 3 years ago
Everyone needs to learn about hydrocell technology. Water can be turned in to HHO gas and used to fuel our cars, homes, business and everything else that requires electricity. It is called electrolysis and it done by passing DC current through water and creates hydrogen bubbles that are combustable. I have built a hydrocell and am installing it in my car. I have so far only made a torch out of it but I have seen enough evidence to say that this technology is real and can work.
pidos847 3 years ago
thats fucking amazing Oo
Hunne128 3 years ago
LOL
canberry22 3 years ago
was machst du ?? geh arbeiten XD
Hunne128 3 years ago
To you and to all HHO generator enthusiast/sellers:
How many Amps/Watts does your in car generator use?
My guess, 2 Amps at 14 Bolts or 28 Watts.
Remember 746 Watts is needed to produce 1HP (ONE HORSEPOWER).
Does the HHO output produce more Watts when burned in the engine than the Watts consumed in your HHO generator?
If the answer is yes, congratulations! You have just invented perpetual motion!
Boyntonstu 3 years ago
what the hell are u talking about the hho gas runs into your intake then goes to your cumbustion chambers it doesn't run off the electricity it runs off the gas
dummerdobbs 3 years ago
Nylon elbow I have on ebay 10 pack 3/8 x 3/8, these things are hard to get locally. Ebay item 250267156123
amillionemails 3 years ago
i think im missing something. ok so, how the heck does that flame feel "only warm to the touch" when it glows up a brass ball? and that other part when the water is condensing... why doesnt it melt the glass or whatever
proNoobist 3 years ago
This is great but given the number of energy consumers there will always be relativly high prices associated with energy.if the HHO from water is burned how would it turn back into H2O?
trmathews205 3 years ago
You answered your own question. HHO is just water that has a bit of a twang to it to make it different than water, but it's very unstable. You heat it up it and it burns into water. You dont see it anywhere near the flame obviously because it's evaporated.
The problem that makes this technology is that it still requires you to burn the hell out of fossil fuels in order to create the electricity(all be it cheaper becuase of the price of coal)... it's just cleaner for the work environment.
lordunderdog 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the comments of the video called "HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)" there is a link to a HHO community website that needs people with experience in HHO technology.
fibertech9 3 years ago
This kind of technology has been around for quite some time, IE a portable welder/gas torch unit called Microweld which converts distilled water via an electro current.
I have also been working on a similar system that uses rain water and biocarbontes, which is heated using the heat from a C A T, the real time fuel savings are immense,
rollotomazi 3 years ago
Water is the most abundant resource on the planet. The only people who think we will ever have problems with water are youtubers. The problem may lie in economics, or politics, but certainly not the lack of water resources... this stuff can run on rain water..
questingforhope 3 years ago
But still, the use of water, Are not not having water problems? And also, this will increase the price of water.
SupremeKingSovereign 3 years ago
Maybe the price of water will rise, but not to 350 a gallon.
Pzski99 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This initiative needs a central location to discuss ideas! Come join the new forum at hhoforums dot com! It's much more useful to have everyone discussing in the same forum instead of youtube!
TeknikL 3 years ago
Wait a second, he just burned holes through Lead, but then he shows how it turns into water and that stuff doesn't burn? WTF!?
Details plz!
Kl4pp5tuhl 3 years ago
Very Awesome! This would not be on Fox news if it was a farce. It's basic chemistry. H20 broken down = hydrogen + hydrogen + oxygen. For many years chemists have known it is possible to break down water into the two basic molecules with electricity. This is very ingenious, and I'm glad to see it is being brought to the forefront. To all the skeptics out there, once it was also believed that the world was flat! What group do you fall into. The smart ones? Or the __________? fill in the blank.
RPMartin43 3 years ago 3
Actually, it would ONLY be on fox news if it was a farce.
fraggle1jock 3 years ago
Fraggle1jock <3's monkey-balls!!! It's true... loves em' like kids love candy.... gobbles em' right up!
p1zl3 3 years ago
so... what happens when we convert all the water to energy? or..... considering the amount of contamination in the current water supply, only say 1/4 of it?
geronimotwo 3 years ago
didnt u hear what he said and saw what the video shows? it turned right back to water afterwards and i know by fact, it cleans the water also.
carrierpilot1357 3 years ago 3
This came from Fox news. Does anyone have a credible source?
alansfraser 4 years ago
I actually witnessed something. pulling out of a parking lot, I saw a Prius with a sticker that said "clean special fuel"
We were behind it until we had to pull over for gas. then when we left and went down the road, the Prius had been totalled, wrecked, and flipped over, hit by some viper or something.
Coincidence? Or big oil hard at work? They mean to stop the electric and gas-less cars. by any means necessary.
Know what you're up against.
WildlifeDen 4 years ago
The Water car comes under the banner of UFO'S, Aliens, and The perfect woman thoery. They dont exist except in the minds of the coach potato hopefuls. Keep on dreaming for you pefect world and keep on waiting. :)
Easydollars 4 years ago
ABSOLUTELY BREATHTAKING!
lamar574 4 years ago
It's groundbreaking! it's revolutionary! and it's a damn shame we'll probably never see it done. :(
I'm sure the oil companies took care of this guy.
On behalf of Wildlife Den though, I'll spread this to whoever I can
WildlifeDen 4 years ago 2
Hydrogen is only a source of energy if it can be taken in its pure form and reacted with another chemical, such as oxygen. But all the hydrogen on Earth, except that in hydrocarbons, has already been oxidized, so none of it is available as fuel. The only way to get free hydrogen on Earth is to make it. The trouble is that making hydrogen requires more energy than the hydrogen so produced can provide.
ITS THE PERFECT SCAM!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
Hydrogen distracts attention from the real and immediate potential of electric vehicles to an unlikely future possibility embraced by automakers, oil companies and a pro-business administration in order to buy time and profits for the status quo. Hydrogen is actually made by reforming hydrocarbons, its use as fuel would not reduce greenhouse gas emissions at all. In fact, it would greatly increase them.
HAL11000 4 years ago
would be interested if you have some sources. good comment
gek81285 4 years ago
Thank you.
Let's say you wanted to produce hydrogen. You choose to do it via steam reformation of natural gas, the most common technique used commercially today. The reaction is:
CH4 + 2H2O => CO2 + 4H2 ΔH = +59 kcal/mole (1)
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
As the positive enthalpy change indicates, the reaction is endothermic (that is, heat-absorbing) and will need an outside source of energy to drive it forward. This can be obtained by burning some methane, which releases 205 kcal/mole, via the following reaction:
CH4 + 2O2 => CO2 + 2H2O ΔH = 205 kcal/mole
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
Assuming an optimistic 72 percent efficiency in using the combustion energy to drive the steam reformation, this would allow us to reform 2.5 moles of methane for every one that we burn (or 5 for every 2). So if we take five units of reaction (1) and add it to two units of reaction (2), the net reaction becomes:
7CH4 + 4O2 + 10H2O => 7CO2 + 4H2O + 20H2
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
As far as usable fuel is concerned, what we have managed to do is trade seven moles of methane for twenty moles of hydrogen. Seven moles of carbon dioxide have also been produced, exactly as many as would have been produced had we simply used the methane itself as fuel.
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
The seven moles of methane that we used up, however, would have been worth 1435 kilocalories of energy if used directly, while the twenty moles of hydrogen we have produced in exchange for all our trouble are only worth 1320 kilocalories. So for the same amount of carbon dioxide released, less useful energy has been produced.
DrBrazil1 4 years ago
greyfalcon dot net/hydrogen4.png
greyfalcon dot net/hydrogen.png
efcf dot com/e/reports/E11.pdf
Look for the movie 'Who killed the electric car?'
HAL11000 4 years ago
@HAL11000 do you ever stop to think of where electricity comes from? if we charge every vehicle on earth from our wall sockets or however this power is delived to our car, where does that power come from? FOSSIL FUELS burned at generator stations. its a fuel shift. we save gasoline but our electricity demand skyrockets! most electricity today is produced by coal, oil, petroleum or nuclear power. unless you have a better way of producing electricity, were back to square one hey?
nobebeselagua 1 year ago
Comment removed
HAL11000 1 year ago
@nobebeselagua I'm aware of the percentage of Electricity generated from fossil fuels. Despite this, widespread use of EVs wont result in a self-defeating "fuel shift." Ever think of the amount of energy required to drill, pump, refine, transport and refuel our gas cars? It's far beyond the energy requirements for an EV. Also, electricity demand won't necessarily "sky rocket," since most charging would occur at night; when power demand is the lowest and electricity the cheapest.
HAL11000 1 year ago
@HAL11000 Yea, but even if we converted half of the USA's vehicles to electricity, we would still have 125 MILLION vehicles charging at night. I believe the demand would skyrocket and electricity would get much more expensive. Its a supply and demand world, why do you think gas prices go up during high traffic seasons like summer break and christmas? once the world is dependent on electricity, that will go up too. mark my words.
nobebeselagua 1 year ago
@nobebeselagua That's quite a long way into the future. Higher nighttime demand, indeed, but I’d imagine by then a higher percentage of renewable energy mixed into the grid; as wind power’s usually stronger at night. Halving the oil industry’s power demand would save much energy, too. Electricity can be generated from many different sources, such as heat from the earth, light from the sun, and waves and tides from the sea. For example, my 4 kW Solar system greatly lowers my electric bill.
HAL11000 1 year ago
They are putting this in all submarines I think for power.
knave2 4 years ago
I bet the government killed the man
leahraealexis 4 years ago
I say the American people sues exon and all the big oil companies for every penny there worth. The American people have gone on too far under there tyrany.
Deathlordtwo 4 years ago
ditto.
djedd23 4 years ago
evert time some one has an invention on saving gas they some how die.......i say its the ceo of valero..hahahaha
shine1221 4 years ago
government is going to buy this watch
JUKIO01 4 years ago
No way! This can't be real
myspaceinvader 4 years ago
Hoax.
ArrowHead83 4 years ago
there was another guy who developed this in the early 90's, and used it to develop a water powered V8. He died shortly thereafter. cause of death: poisoning.
CERTAIN people don't want this getting too big.
garebear409 5 years ago
this is amazing
zieph 5 years ago