Added: 4 years ago
From: CameraPlanetArchive
Views: 582,145
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,244)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Seeing tha metal crumble.. Somehow makes the sight seem so much more incredible. R.I.P.

  • YESSS GRETTING FROM SERBIA!!

  • WHO'S FLIMING.

  • WHOs FLIMIG KNOW HOW IT WAS GOING DOWN. AND PLANED IT. HEH HEH.

  • well obviously the whole building crashed

  • 0:09 is that a person falling?

  • How could you be so ignorant? Just because its America you say that those people deserve to die!? You can go to hell. If ANY country in Europe were attacked we would be the first to help them. And if their citizens are so arrogant that they think they can handle it themselves so be it.

  • @MacJayDion I know right? I love Europeans, but for some reason many of them have some big problem with us. Which is really strange considering we have treaties with majorites of them saying we have your back.

  • @XdemonbearX Euro's don't like Americans for the same reason noone else does: Jealousy.

  • @gorangers94cup That's what I was thinking too

  • @XdemonbearX It's always an "Us and Them" deal isn't it? The pompous arrogance, and silly, provincial worldview is sickening. The rest of the world is moving forwards, and the US is regressing, moving back into a reactionary dark age, even while its armies prop up dictatorships around the world, and half of its citizens are locked in ghettos, relagated to short, dismal lives. Even while the "heathen, foreign world of colour" is "put back in its place" by the noble army of the almighty dollar.

  • @Maetel22 Apparently the "Us and Them" world view is something you believe in rather strongly as demonstrated through your statement. However unlike this XdemonbearX person who would seem to believe it's the virtuous USA vs. the vicious world, you seem to believe it's the big bad USA subjecting itself onto the world. I tend to see it as a little of both. Considering our power (which is on the wane) we could have done much better by the world, but we're also getting it from both ends.

  • @Maetel22 Consistency in criticism would be helpful as well as legitimizing. Also cheap digs at who and what Americans are instead of what is done wrong in our name internationally does not make us care to hear what you or anyone else has to say.

  • @hop208 You put the exact words to my thoughts! And I'm not even from the USA.

  • @hajhej3 Thanks. Cordiality is something that seemed to die that day too. America as a nation needs to be a better listener to the rest of the world, but some people need to stop figuratively screaming obscenities at us. Everything and everyone seems to be more extreme these days. It's kind of scary.

  • @hop208 You did it again!

    So many people out there that are prejudice towards the US and the Americans.

  • @XdemonbearX Im Danish, and most Europeans do not have a problem with the American people, but rather with the government and the corporations. It is true to some point, that we also see you often as superficial, uneducated and very anti-liberal (not meaning this in a political way.- well, maybe a bit) but most of us are not that stupid to make that as a serious assumption, before actually shaking hands with you. I personally love every human being, until they prove me otherwise. RIP 9/11

  • 9/11 inside job

  • rip 9/11..u are all in our hearts..

  • I laugh so hard xD 1 people saying 5 times holy shit in 48 seconds lol

  • @SiRawET999 indeed but at least 500 people died during that 48 seconds cause they were inside the collapsing building...

  • @Daniel0889 500 people? 48 seconds? - Mate, 1,280 people died as the South Tower came down, in 12 seconds.

  • @TheRStard I know now sorry, I'm from Europe, I thought there were trees or bushes at the foot of the building...

  • @SiRawET999 Yeah complete denial, it was really 10 seconds reality denier.

  • Imagine all the point of views of both towers from all around NYC, it really did affect alot of people in many ways

  • NOBODY IS HAPPY BY KILLING ANY SOUL...GOD ( JESUS CHRIST ) BLESS ALL OF US...

  • im so happy that they killed the terrorist that did this so many ppl lost there lives :(

  • @3839hannah Well guess what Americans killed 100,000 innocent civilians in Iraq.... American Government should die

  • who is the terrorist made this ...?

  • watch?v=sA3cxoqSLVU

    That is a chopped up propaganda version of the original.

    vaed.uscourts gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exh­ibits/prosecution.html

    That is where I found the original along with many other photos and videos not released officially to the public. Some interesting photos of inside the pentagon, with no airplane parts.

    Some really sad stuff too. Just looking it over though, I laugh at the old laptop and flight simulator our government planted on these people. whered they get that?

  • I swear, when I saw this live on TV, about ten years ago, my heart pounded till I was shit when I just saw the tower literally buckle, and that ash cloud just dropped within like 3 seconds before hitting the ground......swear to god.

  • that was so fucking epic

  • Comment removed

  • OH SHIT OHMYGOD OH SHIT OH MY GOD... OH SHIT OH MYGOD......

  • The place where it collapses...looked like my bicycle's lock. I lost the key and could never use that particular lock..... due to my PTSD and no money from USA greed govt they had said.

    We're greed.

    Well....White House I guess and their "favs" secret service guards - they did a favor for one to many....and when they did, it was really unfair (ALOT WITH ALL THESE YEARS) and then the war took place.

    Another case of USA did not intervene....with situation on ..."own domestic soil".

  • It just seems so hard to believe that a building could collapse in a null angle after being hit like that.

    lolconspiracy

  • if U look up U see GOD

    if U look down u see Allah (devil / terrorist)

  • ALLAH = GOD OF TERRORISTS >> to much freedom !!

  • the guy that was like omg the hole building crashed is the same guy that was like omg double rainbow just had to point that out and lololol sucks to be in that building i love being a muslim and watching this !

  • @FtwMyFriends Hide behind the computer pussy. Go fuck your man friend's hairy asshole you baby dick smelly dune coon.

  • 00:15: I ejaculated.

  • @wmc1982 that was funny in the episode, but just disrespectful on the actual thing

  • holy shit the whole building crash holy shit

  • Comment removed

  • wait....how did i get here from a red dead redemption unicorn?

  • @ThePhantomCurse thats wut i said

  • That guy was like OH SHIT

  • I am not ignorant. I grew up in the middle east. Arabs are liars. Can't trust them. 1.6 billion Muslims only cause everyone grief. Wish a magic wand would transform them to hot Scandinavian women

  • Did Nero set fire to Rome while he played his flute?

  • This Is Proof That 9/11 WASN'T A INSIDE JOB.

  • @cesarsony124 This proves nothing. All I see is a collapsing building. 

  • @DeusAres1 People Kept Saying That There Was Bombs That Caused The Collapse, This Clearly Shows That The Steel Was Weak Due To The Fire Which Caused The Tower To Collapse Since the weakened steel Couldn't Handle The Weight of the floors.

  • @cesarsony124 exactly which means the building should have toppled near the point of impact. the bottom structure of the building could still stand...this wasnt the part that was affected. it was the top part of the building that was damaged.

  • Chuck Norris would have single handedly prevented 911 if he were given the chance.

  • i think the whole building crashed,just a hunch..

  • gravity is a bitch

  • @pUgeciPe I absolutley agree

  • @pUgeciPe Of all the descriptive phrases to describe 9-11. You choose this. Wow.

  • @dude33ism don't think that im a sdist or something,no i respect all the 9/11 victims and everything

  • @pUgeciPe oh, ok. because we were reading about the holocaust in english class once and one of my friends when he herd what the nazi's would do was all like "What? That's cheap!" and this just reminded me of that! XD

  • @pUgeciPe Gravity is cool. Arabs are scummy assholes

  • @dorot222 yeah i know,it's a joke:DDD

  • @dorot222 U ignorant!

  • @pUgeciPe Gravity had nothing to do with the collapse of 3 WTC buildings on 9/11. The Mossad, CIA and corrupt government officials are a "bitch"

    WTC 7 free fell, and no airplane touched it.

    Impossible. NIST confirmed it.

    Inside job, same as OKC bombing. What a shame.

  • @FnkDctr 14.5 secs free fall speed?

  • @MegaYeshua33 WTC 7 took 14.5 seconds? someone cant count.

    Too bad the entire world said WTC 7 fell in 6.5 seconds. perfect free fall is 6 seconds, and NIST confirmed 2.3 seconds of the collapse was perfect free fall.

    Please know what you're talking about before you troll me. Thanks derp

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @FnkDctr It's loose change that says WTC7 fell in 7 seconds. Nobody else believes this except for the twoofers. The internal collapse lasted 10 seconds, and the outer shell collapsed 7 seconds later. The twoofers cut the video to the outer shell collapsing only, which took 8 seconds, in order to make it look like there was freefall. But in reality, there was nothing supporting that outer shell (because the interior completely collapsed) so it fell quickly.

  • @MazJax What? you only watch movies for facts? uneducated troll is uneducated.

    The NIST report confirmed the WTC 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds. Didnt you read the report? Ohh wait, you were too busy trolling MOVIES on youtube instead of reading actual scientific data.

    Thats what you get when you attempt to debate with an uneducated duhbunktard. Pulling "facts" from movies. I bet it was "based on a true story" too. Fucking moron.

    No such thing as an educated debunker. Idiots.

  • @FnkDctr NIST never said the total collapse time was 6.5 seconds. Straw-man

    Watching movies? WTF are you talking about? You "truth"ers are the ones that keep referring to Loser Change in the first place, and I'm showing you that their movie is based on lies in order to make money. They cut out half the collapse in order to set their agenda and lure more more truther fish to their hook.

  • @MazJax NIST confirmed WTC 7 collapse was 6.5 seconds. Out of the visible 5.4 seconds, 2.3 seconds was confirmed free fall. BY NIST.

    No wonder you DUHBUNKTARDS are so easy to DESTROY in debates. You never read the reports.

    Where do you even get facts from? Oh wait, DUHBUNKTARDS dont go on facts, they go on bullshit stories your pedo freemason cult fabricated to cover up the solid evidence many PROFESSIONALS have EXPOSED

    Keep getting owned, the people see how stupid duhbunktards are

  • @FnkDctr 2.3 seconds was confirmed freefall. But the main section that fell had barely any resistance because the entire interior was GONE. Nothing to give it resistance. However, the rest of the collapse was not freefall.

    Debunkers? A cult? Who're the ones who gather religiously in a group in front of Ground Zero repeating their claims over and over using megaphones? Who're the ones who buy those stupid black shirts from their leaders? Who're the ones who trust 3 college drop outs over NIST?

  • @FnkDctr You have yet to answer me how exactly they managed to take down WTC7 in the first place, you have yet to explain why firefighters reported that WTC7 was unstable and structurally unsound, why the firefighters had to be pulled because of the damage, and the penthouse collapse. Why were the cameras focused on WTC7 and predictions of a collapse issued on LIVE TV if it was a cover up? But the biggest question is why there were no audible/visible explosions in any video whatsoever?

  • @MazJax "Who're the ones who trust 3 college drop outs over NIST?"

    Bill Gates dropped out, but he is the most successful software engineer in the world. Kanye West dropped out, one of the most successful artists in the world.

    Ohh but you need to assume people are inferior because lack of college when you dont have the common sense of a 7th grader? What a complete idiot.

    I actually AGREE with NIST if you werent such a fucking MORON. Try reading something idiot.

  • @FnkDctr Loose Change dropped out of FILM SCHOOL (out of them all) because they weren't good enough. Bill Gates dropped out of HARVARD because he was a revolutionary in science and was already a teenage millionaire with his innovations. He didn't need the extra time there. Kanye West isn't in the science field now is he?

    Look who has the common sense of a 7th grader.

  • @MazJax NIST confirmed it was free fall, over 1400 COLLEGE GRADUATES have came fowards and AGREE WTC 7 COLLAPSE WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO FREE FALL FROM FIRES.

    Those 1400 architects and engineers dont mean anything? ae911truth org? Oh right, you're too stupid to understand 7th grade science, I almost forgot.

    Now its time to answer you pathetic shit questions and destroy everything you attempt to mention like a disinformant troll

  • @FnkDctr Guess what pal, over 125,000 scientists with doctorates in ASCE strongly support the official story, and hundreds of thousands of scholars follow suit. I suppose they mean nothing to you.

    The leader of AE, Richard Gage, compared the WTC to cardboard boxes. Yet you trust him??? Then there's Steven Jones who doesn't know Iron can oxidize at room

    temperature. Seems Legit.

  • @MazJax "You have yet to answer me how exactly they managed to take down WTC7 in the first place"

    Thermite, read the reports kid.

    "you have yet to explain why firefighters reported that WTC7 was unstable and structurally unsound,"

    It wasnt firefighters, someone told Guiliani that morning, which is why he wasnt in there. Go read a time line troll.

    "pulled because of the damage,"

    They pulled because of EXPLOSIONS, not damage.

    "and the penthouse collapse." irrelevant disinformation

  • @FnkDctr Proof of thermite? Where are the 10 mega dumptruck loads that would have been necessary? Were they stuffed into the pockets of the clean-up workers? How did they hide it in a cramped 47 story tower with nobody noticing?

    "It was Giuliani"

    Then why are the quotes DIRECTLY FROM FIREFIGHTERS?

    No, they pulled because of fires and bulging in the structure. I'll list some quotes if you want me to.

    "Irrelevant"

    No, the penthouse destroyed 2/3 of the interior which is why it collapsed.

  • @MazJax You cannot say the instructions to "pull" wtc 7 came from the firefighters, because WTC 7 was a bunker in case of terrorist attacks or national emergencies. However, Mayor Guiliani was instructed NOT to locate at WTC 7 since the "towers were going to collapse"

    /watch?v=uitSb7qDKp4

    This was informed to him before ANY building collapsed. Guiliani was informed around 8-9am, firemen suggested collapse later that afternoon.

    Who told Guiliani? That is who to blame.

  • @MazJax "No, the penthouse destroyed 2/3 of the interior which is why it collapsed."

    Ok, the cause of collapse was fire according to NIST. So regardless of the cause. NIST confirmed 2.3 seconds of free fall during its collapse.

    This would require more than 10 floors to vaporize and have no supports at all. This is the speed of gravity we are talking. Where did those 10 floors go? How can it be standing, then 10 floors POOF gone with zero resistance? Impossible from fires and collapse.

  • @MazJax "Why were the cameras focused on WTC7 and predictions of a collapse issued on LIVE TV if it was a cover up? "

    They werent focused. The news came out saying it had already collapsed, but was still standing.

    This building had no physical indications it was going to collapse before it did. Show me this footage you claim "cameras focused"

    "But the biggest question is why there were no audible/visible explosions in any video whatsoever? " this is an entire comment worth you liar

  • @FnkDctr The cameras were aimed right on the tower. Why would they do this if it was a cover up? That's not how cover ups work. The report that it'd collapsed had sketchy details as stated in that SAME report.

    "The footage that claimed cameras focused"

    Why was there footage of WTC7 burning and collapsing on National Television? To tell the world "Hey, we just puled off the world's greatest conspiracy, let's show it off now!"

    The building had bulging, which is a sign of an imminent collapse.

  • @MazJax "The cameras were aimed right on the tower." WTC 7 collapse was about 5:15pm, the attacks happened earlier around 9am.. therefore a city with millions of people had millions of cameras pointed.

    If you want to hear my honest opinion? Flight 93 had something to do with WTC 7 falling at 5pm instead of 9:30-10am. The phone calls and photos were proven to be fabricated, which is another entire debate lol.

    I enjoy the tough questions though. Keep em coming.

  • @FnkDctr You still have yet to show me any explosions...Audible or otherwise...

  • @MazJax "But the biggest question is why there were no audible/visible explosions in any video whatsoever?"

    Yes there was. In fact, Berry Jennings a WTC 7 survivor explained many explosions. Many people came foward saying bombs were going off. Firemen said bombs were going off inside WTC 7.

    google

    "wtc 7 explosions"

    About 1,270,000 results

    over 1 million pages on the web confirm explosions in WTC 7.

    So my question to you is, are you an idiot with no clue, or a disinformant? fraud

  • @FnkDctr Name one quote with the word bombs in it that doesn't use the word bomb as a comparison. i.e doesn't use the words "like" or "as if I heard a"

    No firefighter or witness believes to this day that they heard bombs. They described the sound to an explosion. A paper bag popping sounds like a gunshot. Does that mean there is a bullet and gunpowder in there? A tornado sounds like a freight train. Does that mean it IS a freight train?

    You truthers don't really like context, do you?

  • @FnkDctr Name me the firefighter that believes bombs were being set off. I know of one whose quote was heavily censored and edited by the truthers that circulates around but I'm not sure if its the one you are referring to.

  • @MazJax "Name me the firefighter that believes bombs were being set off"

    Watch the previous video, many others can be found on the web if you try a search engine.

    The next 2 comments you posted are irrelevant propaganda slander I will not take time to response since it is to take us off course from the topic, the false flag attacks of 9/11.

    The thermite amount claim is incorrect. There are many types and uses, examples can be found by researching the manhattan project.

    Next

  • @MegaYeshua33 Nothing is going to stop that much weight from coming down?

  • @pUgeciPe you're disgusting.

  • Comment removed

  • Did the whole building crash?

  • IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT DO MAKE THE BUILDING concrete core column SWEAR IF IT WAS BUILT WITH THAT IT WOULD CRASH AND LESS PEOPLE COULD HAVE BEEN ALIVE TODAY BUT WE HAVE LEARNED A BIG LESSION FROM THAT SICK DAY !!!

  • THE WHOLE BUILDING JUST COLLAPSED THE WHOLE BUILDING JUST COLLAPSED THE WHOLE BUILDING JUST COLLAPSED!!!!!!!!!!!

    NO SHIT DUMBASS U THINK WE DONT SEE THAT

  • @hardy1181

    I think he could hardly believe what he was seeing and had to say it over and over for it to sink in. In the height of the moment, what would you do? Stand there, shrug?

  • @TheCollaredCrow no probably not i wouldnt but i dont think i would say it over and over again

  • @hardy1181

    True, true. I don't know what I would've done in that kind of situation but I know I wouldn't believe what I was seeing.

  • it was bombs on the bottom levels that detonated otherwise the buildings iron frames shoud have held them up

    just sayin

  • @energyllaugh

    Bombs? On bottom levels? Then why did the collapse start from the plane impact points? Why are no explosions (loud enough for a bomb that would cut through steel or iron in a single blast) caught by the cameras?

  • @wollclark thermite

  • @cipihevent

    There's no evidence for thermite either. If there was thermite we would see bright, almost blinding flashes all over the towers. Also, the paper from Steven Jones was not from a peer reviewed journal and the testing methodology was faulty. Why won't Steven Jones give his samples to independent labs for more testing?

  • @wollclark there is, columns perferctly cut, concrete and steel melt together.

  • @cipihevent

    You can't just say there is, I need links. And please don't link pictures of columns that have been cut with oscillating torches during clean up.

    How would they know exactly where to set thermite? The collapse started from the impact points.

  • @wollclark youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=VZLOa­Qrl938 and there wouldn't be molten metal with the official collapse.

  • @cipihevent

    He's asserting that lateral ejection from a steel corner proves explosives. This is nonsense. Steel beams under stress to the point of snapping or release would also cause lateral ejections: watch?v=jlDghGhVhWk

  • @cipihevent

    continued...

    When the video zooms on the corner you can see the steel bow in and snap under the pressure. The top collapses in initially and then starts to topple as it comes down. As the bottom left corner of the collapsing structure comes up, it forces a lower part of the beam to bend outward until it snaps.

  • @cipihevent

    Also, why wouldn't there be molten metals? Fires insulated by debris could very well reach temperatures high enough to melt certain metals. That's how furnaces work.

  • @wollclark there is no heat source and the enviroment is not sealed, also a demolition happen through the collapse of the building, therefore prove it collapsed doesn't say anything, the main point is that it can't collapse like that without explosive, each floor had always had all the upper floors on top thus their weight, and other of those hit by the plane the rest were surely solid as always, following your theory they should have been collapsed all at once.

  • @cipihevent

    The floors were not made to handle >10 floors collapsing in on them. As the floors collapsed they would take 1, which became 2, then 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and so on. This weight added up; without a concrete core or concrete encased outer columns, there's no way this weight could have been supported.

  • @wollclark the collapse you're talking about would only happen in the opposite way if was so, remember, the first floor is supporting all the floors plus the upper floors falling and impacting with the next down floors, therefore if the wtc really couldn't support the weight it would begin collapsing from the first floors and eventually slowly bend and fall sideway.

    instead the wtc just disappeared in dust, and clearly the top floors fell straight down without resistance.

  • @cipihevent

    If it fell without resistance it would have fully collapsed in nine seconds. It didn't. The south tower collapsed in around 15 seconds and the north tower around 22 seconds. This makes sense because the the south tower's impact was far lower than the north towers, thus there was more weight to bear up top.

  • @wollclark actually they both collapsed around 10 sec, and what you say can't make sense since buildings don't collapse under their own weight unless the use of explosives to cut the main support, if the hit part was really damaged most would bend the upper structure and make it fall aside.

  • @cipihevent South Tower took 15 seconds. North Tower a tad over 20.

  • @cipihevent you're just regurgitating what somebody else has thrown at you. Do you consider people who believe the official story sheeple?

  • @wollclark even with very little resistance it isn't believable that a mere airplane could cause a building of that magnitude to turn into complete dust. And what of the skill it took to steer the airplane into the building. Im sure the terrorists had very little knowledge in the field of driving an aircraft such as that. They've even tested this and deemed it impossible. Not even skilled pilots were able to re-enact the event on a simulator.

  • @DeusAres1 mere airplane ? how many passenger jets have ever crashed into buildings before at 400 mph?

  • @derpotni3riots using basic logic a child could come to the conclusion that a plane as small as that compared to that building isnt just gonna turn to complete dust...the building should have still stood in place. the building was built so that it could withstand a plane crash. just look at the freakin airplane in comparison to the building...their proportioned size and the damages just dont add up. if anything the top half of the building should have just toppled over.

  • @DeusAres1 if anything the top half should of toppled over? Let me guess you know this from all the passenger jets that have smashed into high rise building in past time? Just because your smart does not mean you can calculate all the chaotic unEXPECTED factors from a passenger plane ramming a 110 story high rise building. Look at the collapse of one of the buildings. It starts to topple over and as its doing so the weight shifting collapses the floors below it. Thus no topple.

  • @DeusAres1 so take your topple over theory, is it 100% right? Well then perhaps some of your other points may not be as well? it was built to withstand? No 100% wrong. It was STOPPED from being built because of potential airplane crashes and then they hired engineers to calculate a plane crash from plane half the size and well over half the speed with no fuel. Guess what? City hall was so impressed they didnt dare dispute it. Ok so if two points your learning from maybe more?

  • @DeusAres1 by the way if you think that i think the government had nothing to do with this your making a potential BIG guess in WRONG direction. Just because i believe the planes most likely from all looked into evidence took the buildings down does not mean that no funny business went on at ANY TOP LEVEL anywhere thoughout the world, our government can be fooled easier then believed and then go onto fool the masses. Does that mean gov did it? not always Case specific naturally. cont once more

  • @DeusAres1 it means that it would be SIMPLE for the Goverment to knock the buildings down and blame it on the freakin real wacko dudes that really knocked the buildings down. Secretly FUND them from behind the SCENEs. Then create a CHAOTIC SMOKE SCREEN focused on imaginary bombs CONCEALED in the BUILDING then get rid of all the junk real quick. DONE. OVER. 50 Years later maybe even then it may not be believed, lol. What i elluded to is not hard and this method has created our history

  • @cipihevent

    topple to the left*

    bottom right corner*

  • still cant get it how can hole building just collapse makes you wonder did the building people do a good job or did they built twin towers wrong this is still on debatt

  • @OUWATZAHLE08

    The building was built without a concrete core column, so more space would be available for offices.

  • very sad i hope who every did that will burn in hell and all the people who died may rest in peace

  • its been ten years people, and we're still fighting? shut up... please. believe what you want but quit trying to prove your point of view. i was in the millennium hilton across the street i saw death and people exploding when they hit the ground. i know what happened, my memory is sharp from that day, as any horrific memory. but im not telling you what i saw or my opinion bc its stupid to argue

  • @davisotj1

    People still argue wether it was right to drop the atom bomb, so you don't have a very good point there.

  • @Exilninja yes i do, the same goes for that situation.

  • @davisotj1 No its not stupid to argue. I wanna know the truth as do countless others. Our government gets away with far too much. And simply not talking about it or giving up on finding the truth sets the standard for "sheeple". Much respect goes out to the victims and their families so don't go using the whole "you're being disrespectful for having a reasonable opinion". Check out some of Jesse Ventura's points on the whole event.

  • @davisotj1 Fool. Socrates, Kierkegaard, Nietzche, they would all turn around in their graves.

  • @Xargxes if you don't have anything nice to say don't say it at all

  • @davisotj1 ''nice'' =.=

  • @davisotj1 Uhhhh. yeah. Because people who don't know 911 was an inside job are dumb.. They are still fighting reality.

  • @davisotj1 This war isn't on bin Laden or those pieces of crap. This war is on terroism.

  • @Bunnyzization I know, I'm just pointing out that people can believe what they want about these horrific acts, and that the problem now is the bickering between those who believe it was an inside job, and those who believe the given explanations are true. the reason I don't share my point of view is because with every supporter of what I saw there will always be an opponent so it's pointless to tell because it won't make a damn difference. It happened. And fighting wont bring those victims back

  • @davisotj1 Amen, brother.

  • @davisotj1 oh god.....did people really explode when they hit the ground? ohh...

  • @cobalion91016 in a way, yes. being a curious little man as i was then, i had to look with my dad's new binoculars for my cousin's wedding gift so i got a clear visual. from my vantage point, upon impact they would generally break into a few large or many small shredded pieces scattered about into something un-recognizable as once human. i saw many bodies hit without binoculars, and saw one body hit with the binoculars. At least it was instantly over for those poor souls.

  • @davisotj1 oh my god....they were jumpers, correct? im gonna have a "super easy" time sleeping tonight.... by the way, i hate youtube's new layout. tell me more about the falling people.

  • @cobalion91016 yes i am talking about the jumpers, and there really isn't much else to say. watch the mythbusters episode where they shoot a dead chicken out of an air cannon onto a plane windshield. throw blood in there and you get the picture

  • This video actually disproves the controlled demolition theory. At exactly 0:11, you clearly see the exterior buckling INWARDS, and then collapsing under the weight of the upper floors.

  • @Exilninja actually this video and any evidence prove that the towers were brought down by means other than simply fire from the jet fuel burning initially and ensuing office fires. Are you really that ignorant to believe that jet fuel can burn at such a temperature to melt and warp steel to the point of a collapse. NEVER has there been a documented building collapse due to fire (and yes i know they were hit by planes but both towers were designed to withstand impact from several)

  • @Paulm10690

    This argument is ALWAYS used by ditto truthists such as yourself. Sure, steels MELTING point may not be low enough for jet fuel to burn it, but it's WEAKENING point IS low enough to be affected by the fuel, which is exactly that. The beams inside the towers were not MELTED, they were WEAKENED by the fires, and most of them simply buckled under the sheer mass of the tower's upper floors, causing the collapse.

  • @Paulm10690

    NEVER has there been 200 ton airplanes flown around 500 and 600 miles per hour into twin highrises built without a concrete core or concrete-encased outer columns.

    Look up Interstate 580, Kader Toy Factory, Dogwood Elementary in Virginia, Mumbai High North Platform and the Windsor building in Madrid.