As long as faileoconservatives allow the Left to define what is or isn't respectable, they will remain useless to their friends and harmless to their enemies. Are you hoping you won't be branded a jew-gassing, nigger-lynching nazi? Fat chance.
Yo SA your views and videos are bad ass just ring true. I think we're developing converts. I fully expect your views will be in the 200K range in a few years. Keep it up brother. When folks wonder where the Republican Party should be going, and who its leader should be, they should be looking to Ron Paul and sensing the same need for personal liberty as yourself. Keep preachin' man !
People believe everyone can have a cause but whites.
When they do they believe it's bigotry. It is more inclusive, and includes others, but we are told what to believe.
Screaming the company line is an excuse for thinking and used as oversimplification of an issue that should be addressed. Anything, even conservatism by them or those who join them, results in a mass-media slander by opposition.
The founders were Masons. They set up this system so it would later be controled and destroyed. FD
From Socialism to Communism: People believe in the system too much and do what they're told too much: ...
It is inevitable: Communism is inevitable.
Don't worry. When they get the people cornered, have a few, perhaps, military, or armory, conflicts, they will settle down and we'll get used to more oppression than we've been used to before. Slowly. It will take a long time before you have to have "your papers" to walk down the street: AND DO WHATEVER YOU'RE TOLD TO.
Who'd've thought Paleoconservatism and Postmodernism would end up being so similar (anti-centralization, anti-statist, morally relativist, anti-totality, etc)?
We need secession as a means to snap this horribly out of control federal government back to the foundations. I am deathly afraid that it is already too late to save this republic and it is not partisanship for me at all. I am completely convinced this is no longer about parties, it is about an outright takeover by communists. Anyone who is still in denial needs to take a good hard look at the major players and who their favorite sons are.
I don't know where I stand on this, but succession from a progressive perspective might not be entirely unpositive. I would gladly live in a federation that include the states of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa. They would be a European style social democracy.
I find it funny, though, that many liberals will get infuriated just at the suggestion of a state seceding and becoming independent. I've heard at least a few of them actually say it's "treason." In fact, I have a friend who happens to be a hardcore Republican in Maryland. And for some weird reason, he's a HUGE opponent of secession and state sovereignty.
thats really funny considering that the very basis of our country is secession and that all of our founding documents tell us to do it again if our rights are trampled( like the south did). many states still have a revolution clause in their constitutions.
Mind you, at the same time I'm watching your video, an Atheist Liberal "comedian" is ranting on my tv as insanely as any Fox commentator, and advertisements are playing for Michael Moore's latest socialist propaganda film. I don't say your idea doesn't have merit. I don't say that at all.
Please include the explanation for that wonderful mask you used to wear, which I assume came from pro wrestling.
And, SA, it's not just the Republican party of George W. It's also the party of Daddy George, and Reagan, and Ford, and Nixon, etc
And the statists, Dem and Rep alike, won't let us go our separate ways. For all that Republicans gave the idea lip service during the tea paties, they won't live up to it.
SA, thank you for the history. We still have "state's rights", but let us not forget that this argument was also used to defend "Jim Crow" laws. And, unfortunately, as population grows,so will the government.
I mean, it's not like they stand to lose anything of significance just by admitting Lincoln wasn't the angel they teach us about in school. They'll just stop being so goddamn politically correct when talking about Lincoln. And maybe pc liberals can stop whining about the confederate flag and its "racism." I'm not a Southerner, but I respect freedom and independence, and the "connection" between racism and confederate flag just isn't there, so the libs need to stop making that up.
It figures. The black president from Lincoln's state is just another big government stooge. God, why can't the academic Left just be honest about the REAL Abe Lincoln and stop hiding behind this idealist version of him to justify some of the atrocious things he did, like debauch the currency with greenbacks just to pay for war and deny the Confederacy sovereignty? Not to mention how he had his Union troops massacre lots of innocent Southerners, not just keep the fighting to the battlefield.
It's funny and also downright pathetic. To this day, a lot of Americans still refer to the ENTIRE US as "the Union", even though that was a regional concept devoted to non-confederate states over 100 yeras ago.
Yeah. Lincoln could've easily avoided disaster and war if he had just moved to get Congress/the government to buy off the slaves so they can be free, and it's overall win-win. Instead, he decided to hold onto his pipe dream of "United States", as if it matters if we're one country or two or 3 or 10. The US originally was only 13 states, and I'm pretty sure the Founders never imagined it'd get as big as it is today. Even some of the Founders believed states had the right to secede.
It had nothing to do with slavery. When we left the union slavery was still legal in new jersey, deleware and others where it remained legal till well after the war. The federals did offer to protect slavery forever and of coarse we declined cause that wasent the issue.
You sure about that, man? I'm not judging your intelligence or anything, but I don't think it's completely accurate to say that the war had "nothing to do" with slavery. After all, it seems highly unlikely that the South seceding not long after the first REALLY antislavery, or so he claimed, president came about had nothing to do with slavery. It must've been a factor, if even just a minor one. Do you have any proof that it had nothing to do with slavery? Was this just a coincidence, then?
The emancipation proclimation wasent signed untill 2 years after the war statred and it only applied to western territories and "sites of rebellion". States that remained loyal to the union were allowed to keep their slaves. It didnt free anybody. it was simply a tool of war for the federals. If the imperials were really fightin to end slavery why did they still allow it at home?
Actually it was worse than that. It said all states not part of the Union by X date will be destroyed and their slaves freed. It was a last attempt by Lincoln to tell the South that if they just obey him, they can keep their slaves.
why would mostly poor rural white southerners fight an uphill battle against such huge industrialist as the the north for so many years? to allow the rich white men to keep their slaves? does that really make sense to anyone?
No, that was Andrew Jackson. People get the two easily confused. Jefferson preserved the system as it was, and Jackson laid the foundation for the modern fascist state you see today.
It's either death or money with these people: Look at Congress: It's obvious: Kennedy, Reagan, John Lennon ("radical or crazy"), Robert Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Obama -- Oh my! Lincoln too, with the Continental.
This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed of, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable [address delivered at Washington, D.C.; in Roy P. Basler, The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Volume V, pages 371-375].
I agree. Color shouldn't be a factor. The only reason it is is because it is pushed on our kids since Kindergarten. Or maybe earlier depending on one's family.
is no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal.... Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the negro and give him our language, literature, religion, and system of government under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wow the southern states leaving the union. Can you say Ireland x10. Try explaining that to all those blacks that remember what the southern states did to them. Was it not the "big government" that saved them from the south? I think it was. Well good luck with that dont come crying to use when you people have to use what little money you have to put down constant rebellions....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
True. But modern blacks were not alive then. Many were alive when the government came to their aid. Its why 90% vote democrat. Also let me remind you the south shot first. Dont bitch about what happened to you when you started that shit. And I know very well the civil war was not about slavery. I live in Texas every history teacher I have had since the 7th grade made that clear.
The British shot first, firebombed German cities way before Germans made any aggression against them. Does this means Churchill was evil and Hitler the good one?
Also "judea declares war against Germany", does that makes the jews the ones who declared WW2 open? look it up
The British acted in response to the German invasion of poland. Poland was an ally of the French and British. In fact the British should have attacked Germany sooner. The Germans violated a treaty they signed. And no invading a country does not make you evil. Invading a country then murdering millions of its people because you dont like thier god makes you evil.
The Versailles treaty, it guaranteed there would be a WW2 by partitioning the land and separating several German nationals from their homeland. It forced the Germans into paying impossible reparations which sinked Germany into the worst depression any country has ever experienced. Prior to that, Germany was a very well industrialized and up and coming potency, which the Imperialistic British did not like and therefore forced Germany into WW1.
thanks. some actually still think that our history books are actual history... teach children the truth about history and they will not be doomed to repeat it - teach the adults the truth about history and we might do what our parents and grandparents did not: stop the fascist corporate takeover.
@immanent Fact: The fugitive slave act was passed by a US Congressed dominated by Southerners, in part because of the 3/5th clause. Fact: The South seceded because Lincoln would not allow slavery to expand into the Western Territories, which would have eventually ended Southern domination of the US Congress. Fact: Slavery is explicitly mentioned as reason for secession in all declarations of secession. Fact: The South started the Civil War with military attacks against the United States.
Ignorant fool. The amount of ignorance there is appalling. No white today ever enslaved a black nor did any black living today ever experience life under that institution. It's time to move forward. Nobody wants slavery. If you think all the people who wear the flag want slavery that is a very great delusion. Do you also think all the northern secessionists want child slavery reinstated in factories? The empire has run it's course, through ballot or revolution the american people will be free.
This whack ball actually isn't actually not that much of a whack ball.
zaggers77 1 year ago
big gov is like a snow ball rolling down hill. it will take all in it's path, and will not stop till it reaches it's end..
davideli7879 2 years ago
A Coral-color Frill shirt... Just what year was that?
werebear1 2 years ago
great videos
MightySnail007 2 years ago
amen brother please keep it up
whtdude13 2 years ago
As long as faileoconservatives allow the Left to define what is or isn't respectable, they will remain useless to their friends and harmless to their enemies. Are you hoping you won't be branded a jew-gassing, nigger-lynching nazi? Fat chance.
2minuteh8 2 years ago
facebook?
gf4rce 2 years ago
hahaha... Soda Pop Curtis! where can we hear SA shredding?
yowhatitlooklike 2 years ago
Yo SA your views and videos are bad ass just ring true. I think we're developing converts. I fully expect your views will be in the 200K range in a few years. Keep it up brother. When folks wonder where the Republican Party should be going, and who its leader should be, they should be looking to Ron Paul and sensing the same need for personal liberty as yourself. Keep preachin' man !
Kurtigo73 2 years ago 2
you are so awesome Jack.
taking these bold stances earns you yet more respect. rock on brah.
willyrobinson 2 years ago
I think I found this page because of doing a search for the Black Avenger awhile back!
4:40 - The 2nd guy behind the podium kinda looks like Hannity.
Is that one newspaper picture you playing bass?
FateEternal 2 years ago
SA, you have a way of informing and educating, clearly and succinctly, but with a smooth delivery. My reasons to subscribe and refer others. :)
borderraven 2 years ago 2
People believe everyone can have a cause but whites.
When they do they believe it's bigotry. It is more inclusive, and includes others, but we are told what to believe.
Screaming the company line is an excuse for thinking and used as oversimplification of an issue that should be addressed. Anything, even conservatism by them or those who join them, results in a mass-media slander by opposition.
The founders were Masons. They set up this system so it would later be controled and destroyed. FD
MarkBH70 2 years ago
Excellent stuff, SA. In my view, eliminating the Feds completely from our lives is the only way forward to peace, prosperity and liberty.
RedShirtArmy 2 years ago 2
unless the individual asserts his rights the United States is doomed.
mattussr 2 years ago 3
From Socialism to Communism: People believe in the system too much and do what they're told too much: ...
It is inevitable: Communism is inevitable.
Don't worry. When they get the people cornered, have a few, perhaps, military, or armory, conflicts, they will settle down and we'll get used to more oppression than we've been used to before. Slowly. It will take a long time before you have to have "your papers" to walk down the street: AND DO WHATEVER YOU'RE TOLD TO.
MarkBH70 2 years ago
how the founders intended it. each state was sovereign unto its own. and people could live in the state which suited them best.
mattussr 2 years ago
Who'd've thought Paleoconservatism and Postmodernism would end up being so similar (anti-centralization, anti-statist, morally relativist, anti-totality, etc)?
beholdmyswarthyface0 2 years ago
Then there are people like me, who think you're not radical enough!
LOL
VonHelton 2 years ago
I'm with you SA.
We need secession as a means to snap this horribly out of control federal government back to the foundations. I am deathly afraid that it is already too late to save this republic and it is not partisanship for me at all. I am completely convinced this is no longer about parties, it is about an outright takeover by communists. Anyone who is still in denial needs to take a good hard look at the major players and who their favorite sons are.
The list is long and unmistakable.
kmg501 2 years ago
I don't know where I stand on this, but succession from a progressive perspective might not be entirely unpositive. I would gladly live in a federation that include the states of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa. They would be a European style social democracy.
PsychoPunk1965 2 years ago
I find it funny, though, that many liberals will get infuriated just at the suggestion of a state seceding and becoming independent. I've heard at least a few of them actually say it's "treason." In fact, I have a friend who happens to be a hardcore Republican in Maryland. And for some weird reason, he's a HUGE opponent of secession and state sovereignty.
whoo689 2 years ago 3
It's treason to them because they ally with the feds over their homes. This is the problem. Your family and community should always come first.
Luigi84289 2 years ago
thats really funny considering that the very basis of our country is secession and that all of our founding documents tell us to do it again if our rights are trampled( like the south did). many states still have a revolution clause in their constitutions.
mattussr 2 years ago
One
Big
Aweful
Mistake
America
DCUPtoejuice 2 years ago
Perfection...
hardmod777 2 years ago
SA,
You sir,are a great American.
I only wish Obama and the many other political figures would be as transparent.
FuckObamasMama 2 years ago
Mind you, at the same time I'm watching your video, an Atheist Liberal "comedian" is ranting on my tv as insanely as any Fox commentator, and advertisements are playing for Michael Moore's latest socialist propaganda film. I don't say your idea doesn't have merit. I don't say that at all.
RealArcalian 2 years ago
Please include the explanation for that wonderful mask you used to wear, which I assume came from pro wrestling.
And, SA, it's not just the Republican party of George W. It's also the party of Daddy George, and Reagan, and Ford, and Nixon, etc
And the statists, Dem and Rep alike, won't let us go our separate ways. For all that Republicans gave the idea lip service during the tea paties, they won't live up to it.
RealArcalian 2 years ago
SA, thank you for the history. We still have "state's rights", but let us not forget that this argument was also used to defend "Jim Crow" laws. And, unfortunately, as population grows,so will the government.
Redthatsmyname 2 years ago
how long have you been a guitarist?
Pentazoid111 2 years ago
Soda Pop Curtis?
sinlaael 2 years ago
I mean, it's not like they stand to lose anything of significance just by admitting Lincoln wasn't the angel they teach us about in school. They'll just stop being so goddamn politically correct when talking about Lincoln. And maybe pc liberals can stop whining about the confederate flag and its "racism." I'm not a Southerner, but I respect freedom and independence, and the "connection" between racism and confederate flag just isn't there, so the libs need to stop making that up.
whoo689 2 years ago 2
It figures. The black president from Lincoln's state is just another big government stooge. God, why can't the academic Left just be honest about the REAL Abe Lincoln and stop hiding behind this idealist version of him to justify some of the atrocious things he did, like debauch the currency with greenbacks just to pay for war and deny the Confederacy sovereignty? Not to mention how he had his Union troops massacre lots of innocent Southerners, not just keep the fighting to the battlefield.
whoo689 2 years ago 3
It's funny and also downright pathetic. To this day, a lot of Americans still refer to the ENTIRE US as "the Union", even though that was a regional concept devoted to non-confederate states over 100 yeras ago.
whoo689 2 years ago
Its still the same union. its just not voluntairy anymore. now we are just united by gunpoint instead of choice.
What pisses me off is when they refer to the forced union as a country.
803honda 2 years ago 4
Yeah. Lincoln could've easily avoided disaster and war if he had just moved to get Congress/the government to buy off the slaves so they can be free, and it's overall win-win. Instead, he decided to hold onto his pipe dream of "United States", as if it matters if we're one country or two or 3 or 10. The US originally was only 13 states, and I'm pretty sure the Founders never imagined it'd get as big as it is today. Even some of the Founders believed states had the right to secede.
whoo689 2 years ago
It had nothing to do with slavery. When we left the union slavery was still legal in new jersey, deleware and others where it remained legal till well after the war. The federals did offer to protect slavery forever and of coarse we declined cause that wasent the issue.
803honda 2 years ago
You sure about that, man? I'm not judging your intelligence or anything, but I don't think it's completely accurate to say that the war had "nothing to do" with slavery. After all, it seems highly unlikely that the South seceding not long after the first REALLY antislavery, or so he claimed, president came about had nothing to do with slavery. It must've been a factor, if even just a minor one. Do you have any proof that it had nothing to do with slavery? Was this just a coincidence, then?
whoo689 2 years ago
The emancipation proclimation wasent signed untill 2 years after the war statred and it only applied to western territories and "sites of rebellion". States that remained loyal to the union were allowed to keep their slaves. It didnt free anybody. it was simply a tool of war for the federals. If the imperials were really fightin to end slavery why did they still allow it at home?
803honda 2 years ago 3
Actually it was worse than that. It said all states not part of the Union by X date will be destroyed and their slaves freed. It was a last attempt by Lincoln to tell the South that if they just obey him, they can keep their slaves.
ThePintsizeslasher 2 years ago 3
why would mostly poor rural white southerners fight an uphill battle against such huge industrialist as the the north for so many years? to allow the rich white men to keep their slaves? does that really make sense to anyone?
as honda said, it was about states rights.
mattussr 2 years ago 2
@Video
Interesting
@4:44
Isn't that the truth.. (What the sign says)
And, for the love of all that is holy, please southern avenger, never wear that pink frilly shirt again.
MRSketch09 2 years ago
I could be wrong but for all his tough talk before, once he became president didn't Jefferson expand the government a whole hell of a lot?
badtown88 2 years ago
No, that was Andrew Jackson. People get the two easily confused. Jefferson preserved the system as it was, and Jackson laid the foundation for the modern fascist state you see today.
CABALmk2 2 years ago
wrong. Jackson killed the second "fed". wilson allowed the bankers that bought him off to enact the third...and later regretted it.
QuantumBios 2 years ago
Jackson was almost "shot".
It's either death or money with these people: Look at Congress: It's obvious: Kennedy, Reagan, John Lennon ("radical or crazy"), Robert Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Obama -- Oh my! Lincoln too, with the Continental.
MarkBH70 2 years ago
This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed of, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable [address delivered at Washington, D.C.; in Roy P. Basler, The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Volume V, pages 371-375].
Luigi84289 2 years ago 4
@Luigi84289
Well I would not say that it is impossible, but I would say that it has definitely become much more difficult to attain this situation.
I mean after all, no matter what color one is, everyone wants freedom over themselves, and doesn't want to be bothered by someone else.
MRSketch09 2 years ago
I agree. Color shouldn't be a factor. The only reason it is is because it is pushed on our kids since Kindergarten. Or maybe earlier depending on one's family.
Luigi84289 2 years ago 2
is no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal.... Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the negro and give him our language, literature, religion, and system of government under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here.
Luigi84289 2 years ago 3
When you become a free market anarchist you will be a real radical.
overmind25 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow the southern states leaving the union. Can you say Ireland x10. Try explaining that to all those blacks that remember what the southern states did to them. Was it not the "big government" that saved them from the south? I think it was. Well good luck with that dont come crying to use when you people have to use what little money you have to put down constant rebellions....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Oh you mean that same big government that passed the fugitive slave act?
And why did every other nation manage to abolish slavery without having to slaughter 600,000 in scorched earth warfare?
The Civil War wasn't about slavery, bro. And Lincoln isn't the guy you read about in your government history book.
immanent 2 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
True. But modern blacks were not alive then. Many were alive when the government came to their aid. Its why 90% vote democrat. Also let me remind you the south shot first. Dont bitch about what happened to you when you started that shit. And I know very well the civil war was not about slavery. I live in Texas every history teacher I have had since the 7th grade made that clear.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
The British shot first, firebombed German cities way before Germans made any aggression against them. Does this means Churchill was evil and Hitler the good one?
Also "judea declares war against Germany", does that makes the jews the ones who declared WW2 open? look it up
werebear1 2 years ago
The British acted in response to the German invasion of poland. Poland was an ally of the French and British. In fact the British should have attacked Germany sooner. The Germans violated a treaty they signed. And no invading a country does not make you evil. Invading a country then murdering millions of its people because you dont like thier god makes you evil.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
The Versailles treaty, it guaranteed there would be a WW2 by partitioning the land and separating several German nationals from their homeland. It forced the Germans into paying impossible reparations which sinked Germany into the worst depression any country has ever experienced. Prior to that, Germany was a very well industrialized and up and coming potency, which the Imperialistic British did not like and therefore forced Germany into WW1.
werebear1 2 years ago
thanks. some actually still think that our history books are actual history... teach children the truth about history and they will not be doomed to repeat it - teach the adults the truth about history and we might do what our parents and grandparents did not: stop the fascist corporate takeover.
PwndByTheFed 2 years ago
Lincoln's views on black people (typical white supremacist ignornant horrible view)
"I have urged the colonization of the negroes, and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan. There
Luigi84289 2 years ago
@immanent Fact: The fugitive slave act was passed by a US Congressed dominated by Southerners, in part because of the 3/5th clause. Fact: The South seceded because Lincoln would not allow slavery to expand into the Western Territories, which would have eventually ended Southern domination of the US Congress. Fact: Slavery is explicitly mentioned as reason for secession in all declarations of secession. Fact: The South started the Civil War with military attacks against the United States.
therealaj123 10 months ago
Ignorant fool. The amount of ignorance there is appalling. No white today ever enslaved a black nor did any black living today ever experience life under that institution. It's time to move forward. Nobody wants slavery. If you think all the people who wear the flag want slavery that is a very great delusion. Do you also think all the northern secessionists want child slavery reinstated in factories? The empire has run it's course, through ballot or revolution the american people will be free.
Luigi84289 2 years ago 3
A conservative I can dig. And Jack, fyi, it was you that changed my opinion about the Confederate Flag.
tattypatty 2 years ago
That's quite a compliment tattypatty. Thanks.
southernavenger 2 years ago
@southernavenger thankyou southern avenger you had informed me so much of my political party and southern nationalism keep up the great work
Southernjuggalo63 1 year ago
@southernavenger have sorry
Southernjuggalo63 1 year ago
Preach on, Brother Jack.
steve0281 2 years ago
That gave me a good laugh. Everyone I know is getting more radical as they grow older - you are not the only one SA.
utubehayter 2 years ago
awesome
SoniakaDeeD 2 years ago