Added: 3 years ago
From: artmaze1974
Views: 3,974,815
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,776)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Friggin' awesome.

  • @perryizgr8 can you give an example of serial only processes?

  • From what i understand they got arrested for firing an experimental cannon through a suburban house... God Damn i love these guys...

  • this is like hardcore porn for nerds

  • I guess the cpu with many cpu chips these days still does things serially, but isn't the same as a gpu that does everything at once, am I right?

  • If i had to pick any celebrity i would like to know personally, it would be either Adam Savage or Jackie Chan

  • @RealityShift1981 What about agent walrus 3:  i.e. Jamie? lol

  • It's the JoKer!

  • naw, I was expecting a realistic looking mona lisa but that was still epic

  • Looks like a minecraft portrait.

  • If this show gets canceled because of the stupid cannon incident, I will lose all faith in society

  • its funny cause they shot a cannon through someones house today

  • what did the guy yelling at 1:50 said?

  • 240p we meet again...

  • Why does kari always seem ready and willing?

  • OMG...

  • O love

  • And this is why I love the mythbusters xD <3

  • Where's the Jackass krew when you need them ..

  • I would laugh if the balls chopped

  • i can do that faster with my buttcheeks while eating a sandwitch with no paintbrush

  • Nvidia has all of this equipment on display in their building A lobby.

    It's pretty awesome up close.

  • Wish I could use that in a paintball battle

  • @Thewhitedragon4242 You would blow peoples limbs off

  • A little Saturday morning mythbusters marathon then HornyHabits com. Gonna be a good day! Haha

  • Time to replace my art teacher.

  • So awesome

  • AWESOME!

  • it looks like minecraft

  • OOMMGG THIS IS AMAZING

  • IT'S A JOKER! Lmao!

  • It would be 1100 paintball guns.

  • that must have take a lot of work!!!

  • @THEBIGCAGEY lol

  • that was awesome!!

  • that looks more like my mom lol jk

  • 1:41 to skip all the shit xD

  • see all mythbusters episodes for free @

    mythbustermovies . tk

  • CPU 1 WIMS AGAIN

  • Square paint balls? I mean that Mona is rasterized. fa..

  • 243 people don't like painting

  • 243 dislikes? like wtf would anyone not think this is kewl? amazing.

  • awesome. love those guys!

  • Eepiiiicccc

  • are there any comments that aren't over 6 lines long?

  • @NaLi2977 mine

  • Leonardo must be proud.

  • Welldone Mythbusters.

    Check OpenCL on GPU and later on APU as well.

  • go to @1:56 watch the mona lisa

  • That would be good for laning.

  • Wow!

  • lmao

  • Dear Santa..

  • Does someone host an "unknown" mythbusters show?

  • @erismo23 You try too hard.

  • getting a Sapphire AMD HD 6570 2GB DDR3

  • Уххх пяздатые ребята)

  • there was no actual gpu or cpu here. the guy was just trying to make a point that parallel processing is better than serial processing. but we know that even that isn't always true. some processes can only be done serially.

  • @perryizgr8 nerd

  • @perryizgr8

    altho parallel data transfer is not always the best option

    ide hard drives are slower then sata drives

    ide is parallel sata is serial

    ide is slower because of cross talk - data on one wire bleeding across to where it shouldnt be and the data sets getting mixed up

    sata sends the data one peice after the other serially meaning it can go faster without getting hit by cross talk

    also xbox 360 dvd drives are sata

  • I'm bringing that shit to a match.

  • getting a Sapphire AMD HD 6570 2GB DDR3

  • how can you dislike something like this!?

    

  • @al3k0 by clicking the dislike button...?

  • @ZomBgaming

    i think the meant that in another way... -.-

  • Wheww...Mona Lisa smoke... Don't breathe this

  • hold down 8! D:

  • then why not replace cpu with the gpu?

  • If Leonardo da Vinci saw it he would shit bricks!

  • isn't this just a variation of a copying machine? what's the wow factor?

  • LMFAO 1:51 for "ITS THE JOKER!"

  • Ok CPU: A little robot comes in draws a picture, Jamie: Oh my god this is so bad!!!. GPU: A giant monstrous expensive machine is revealed which costs aproximately 5000 times the money the Robot costs and it does the exact same as the robot, with the only difference that it is limited to one possible picture... , Jamie: Oh my god this is really great.

    Now do you see my sarcasm and do you also understand why this comparison is totally braindamaged? ...

  • @flasher395

    They compare the two to show how bad CPUs are able to show graphics.

    If you ever happen to programm a 3d Program and you use the so-called reference device to draw the graphics, you will use your CPU to render what you want to show.

    And before anyone yells that this down't make sense: With the reference device you can basicly emulate current GPU functionalities.

  • @flasher395 the idea is that cpu's work in serial, one bit after the other, where the gpu is in paralel so many bits at one time don't talk about computers any more.

  • @flasher395 the cpu works in serial one bit after the other, which creates a bottle neck slowing the system down. the gpu works in parallel, which is many bits at a time which is clearly faster, it wasn't necessarily cost or the robots, just a really expensive demo of the difference between serial and parallel. arent hard drives serial and parallel yes, thats not what they're covering either, they're talking about the proc,.. look don't bother putting to much thought into it w/e.

  • @MrGrnLntern889 You are very euphemistic. There are many processes which can ONLY be done serially. How do you want to calculate with a number you dont have for example. The answer is, you cant and thats the difference between CPUs and GPUs. The CPUs try to get results by becoming faster in all of their abilities because they dont have another chance. The GPUs can easily use parallel structures and thats the reason they are different from CPUs. None of them is inferiour, they're just different.

  • @flasher395

    By your sarcasm, a man picking plants one at a time and a harvester are the same thing. The point here is speed. While I agree the demonstratioin isn't quite as accurate as it was supposed to be, your example is flawed, too. Because while a CPU and GPU can do some of the same things, the CPU will do them them thousands of times slower.

  • @Draknfyre Well no, actually its not flawed at all, thats the exact same thing after all. Lets just take your example of the man picking plants. The CPU would be a 2.5m high 250 pound man and the Gpu would be 10 1.5m big 100 pound men. The thing is even though the bigger man can do things the smaller men cant do this work is better suited for the small men as they can do much "easy" work at once while the big man cant. Its the very same argument...

  • @flasher395

    Your example was flawed because you said "do the exact same thing."

    CPU's cannot do everything a GPU can do. There are hardware-specific abilities that a CPU could only do thru complicated software emulation, and then it would be thousands of times slower.

    And look up CUDA. While I don't like nVidia, using a GPU for specific tasks like crunching numbers can produce results literally thousands of times faster.

  • @Draknfyre I think you are understanding something wrong. Everything GPUs and CPUs do are calculations. They are both just "processing units" And yeah they can do the exact same thing. Of course there are some calculations which are implemented in the GPUs's hardware which cant be done by the CPU directly, but they can be done by bypasses. So yeah they are the exact same thing with the one difference that GPUs are optimized in some cases. That doesnt change the fact they can do the same things..

  • @flasher395

    Calculations, yes, but speed of calculations, no. Like I said, look up CUDA. When number-crunching certain things, you can get results thousands of times faster using a CUDA-enabled program, and a CUDA-capable CPU. Not exaggerations, but literally thousands of times faster.

    And there's still hardware features not found in CPU's that exist in GPU's. Their very architecture is different. Using software emulation to do the features found on GPU hardware would be ridiculously slow.

  • @Draknfyre Well yeah I agree, but the thing is that its still calculations even though they are implemented a bit differently. And yeah I know certain things are thousands of times faster with CUDA and i already knew it. But still the GPU is basically just a bunch of small slow CPUs crunched together with some other units which enable it to do certain things /calulations way faster than a CPU can do...

  • that was just awesome

  • simpson already did it .. the shotgun makeup

  • @ragespot South Park did it too.

  • IT'S THE JOKER!!!!!!!!! lol

  • lol

    

  • its the paintball gun from hell

  • i counted 1099 barrels. so disapointing

  • Computers are seriously powerful...makes you think what's next

  • @MDIVISIONRULES skynet!!!!

  • @codfan671 Damn you! if only I had bee here seven hours ago I could have answered with skynet :(

  • @codfan671 skynet? Well,i was going to say quantum computers

  • ITS the MINECRAFT VERSION!!

  • that cpu must have been a pentium 3....

  • fuck they must be so rich their toilet paper is gold lol

  • @3DDYR I think that would hurt like hell

  • these guys are so brilliant i don't understand how they accomplish everything they do.

  • wow

  • i'd love to see johnny knoxville stand infront of this bad boy !

  • @anglicky69 too late jamie did it!

  • @paterson13 aww no way ?? got a link to share ? but i bet he didn't look as funny wearing aviators, dickie pants and a cup like Knoxville though.. lol.

  • @anglicky69 that would be the funny est thing ever

  • MY GOD

  • I love the mystbusters seasons. great at all times!

  • just a little smaller and you wouldn't have to use spray cans for graffiti anymore !!!lol

  • lol! that Mona Lisa looked like a low CGI from 80s or 90s...

  • How much is that going to sell for ? LOL

  • Im going to buy that and say HEAD-SHOT!

  • i want that paintball gun

  • LOL!!! LMFAO!!! It's The JOKER!!!

  • WATCH OUT! DONT BE FOOLED! ITS A DOOMSDAY DEVICE!!!

  • @glok6 Um dude, its Paintballs...i dont think it can get any better then that, lol

  • Yeah the guy yelled "its the joker"

  • @christylove13 he yelled "even sharper"

  • That is awesome

  • that is quite possibly the coolest thing i have ever seen.

  • 1:53 its the joker xDD

  • i would hate to be in a paint ball gun war

  • screw whatever new amazing marker spyder or tippman have, im taking this thig paint-balling!

  • Awww WOW!!! lol Adam

  • hardly a cpu vs gpu comparison.

    thanks for the bull nvidia #

  • YAAAAAA!!!! slow mo was epic!!! MYTHBUSTERS ROCK!!!!! XD

  • did any one hear ITS A HOAR at 1:52

  • @krazeybub1 i thought he said ITS THE JOKER!

  • @EmmettSilentNuke nah he said ITS A STRIPPER!!..i think

  • "did any one hear ITS A HOAR at 1:52"

    I don't know what the guy in the audience was shouting, but if you (and three other guys who gave your comment a thumb up) heard "hoar" (or "whore", as more literate people prefer to spell it), you should check your speakers.

  • at around 0:49 i started laughing my ass off.. haha!!! Love your sense of humor guys!!! haha

  • goddammit don't you hate when fat dudes yell out?

  • Cool ~~ =皿=

  • I'd auction that off to charity.

  • Imagine getting shot by that. 

  • @xDaRkModEx jammie did

  • @bimbim007 For real? where to i see that?

  • this takes graffiti to a whole new level

  • someone should have stood in front of it

  • @diabolicalheaven They did it at YouTube Live. watch?v=7A0sjIh6_YQ

  • skip to 1:37

  • owch

    

  • IT'S THE JOKER

  • impresionante.

  • attach a real gun to that and lo and behold we have a terminator!

  • 232 people hate leonardo da vinci

  • @boldziga They're probibly think de Caprio

  • Thats really awesome !

  • Except that its that simple so it can row reduce to go faster through some narrow channel. Like a CPU can always have 41 thousand transistors, but just row reduces with a billion transistors, making virtually no difference, or else the demonstation would be less than light saber spectacular in the other direction.

  • Sound ???

    

  • meh... myth not busted...

    should have been called "8bit vs 64bit" or something that actually makes sense

  • ITS THE JOKER!

    aaaaaahahah

    

  • @HEHOPMALEH who?

  • @83backbreaker

    after the painting is done there is a guy that yells it

    just hear carefully at 1:52

    "ITS THE JOKER"

  • holy shit!

  • I thought the first smiley was the Mona Lisa and I was like "really?" -_-

  • @DSend18 and was like you know like really like was like really? like really.cuz i was like what are you saying like really i was like you know like really? like

  • @83backbreaker lol, ok there.

  • @DSend18 same here haha

  • look like jesus to me

  • a CPU is a central proccessing unit. (feel free to correct my spelling) it proccesses things like programs and windows. a GPU is a graphics proccessing unit, this proccesses complex graphics equations in thngs like video games...

  • Epic!

  • 1:37

  • it also shows how many paint goes to waste if you watch the slow motion :P

    lol

  • WOW ! awesome ! 

  • HOLY SHIT