in order for something to be scientifically, acepted, it has to be repetitive, and you fools can't even travel the space to see if laws of phisycs are the same here as in the ends of the creation,,,, nop i believe in the word of God. and shall see soon who is right
The movie clip you show is entertaining, but it is, itself, a bit inaccurate, with the new widely accepted theory about the formation of our moon. A smaller planetoid collided with the earth, and struck at an 'angle', and not once but twice. This not only unbalanced the proto-earth, but forced the earth to form again in a sense. Thus the land mass referred to in that video clip didn't happen until "Earth Mark II" had formed. :)
I find the actual creation of the Earth to be far more interesting and explanatory than Genesis could ever hope to be. The newly-formed Earth, essentially a big fireball, would be too much of a violent and inhospitable hell for any human to survive. In fact, nothing but the hardiest microbes would have a fighting chance at survival in an environment like that.
As a lifelong atheist, I appreciate your knowledge of the bible. I've read it. The whole damn thing. You are doing something I cannot do. Scientifically disprove the bible. I say I cannot because the book makes no sense to me. Talking donkey's and snakes? Four corners on a sphere?
Excellent videos, I'm sure the vote bots are on their way.
It's funny how Creationists try to use granite rock as evidence for a 6,000 year old Earth yet fail to realize a long process of cooling is what created grantite rock, and it isn't 6,000 years old. Did they pay attention in Geology class? Basic Geology could disprove Genesis.
@brettppalmer there are some holes in your theory also and i am not defending the bible it sounds good my question is where are your facts/? to back your claims .I know the bible has contridictions and unsolved mysteries in it, the mistake that I believe christians and scientist make is that they put God on a human level and your explanations are against men who claim that this is God's word and if God is all the we believe then the problem is with the them and not God
@9liveslef I'm not sure I follow you, but I understand the restraints of this comment section. Please send me a personal note (either here on YouTube or via my email) and I can better engage your questions.
Great Video!! I'm going to have to go back & watch 1-4 when I have a little extra time. I really enjoyed this. Your videos are very informative & educational for those of us who, like most christians, know little about the bible. Thanks... glad I subbed!
@Starbat88 He's using a literal translation from the original Hebrew. Even so, that would take a special kind of mental gymnastics to reconcile such an obvious inconsistency.
@lowcomedy Yes, but I'm sure the ancient Hebrews didn't have a word for "quantum plenum", simply because they didn't know about it. Therefore, the best approximation in their primitive culture would be "fluid", or "water".
@lowcomedy Bingo. Those who say, "Well, the ancient Hebrews didn't have a word for...." fall into two camps (and often have mattresses in both). One is the camp that forgets the book was supposed to have been divinely inspired from omniscience; the other is the camp of those who don't know biblical Hebrew and so haven't researched if there really WAS a better word/phrase that could have been used.
@brettppalmer And both camps fail in ways that can only be described with multi variable calculus, where the universal constant is x which equals = FAIL! and y is equal to the lulz we get from laughing at them.
You inspired me to re-read Genesis. Lol its funny cuz it contradicts itself so much in those first chapters its amazing people believe what comes after it. Then i understand but now, with all we know... just doesn't makes sense.
@BADAZZociation That's how it started for me too. Atheist showed me stuff in the Bible nobody ever pointed out directly before. Do you remember in the hall, or at book studies, when they'd read something weird from the Bible, and then they'd tell some outlandish hypothetical story to make it sound logical? Even during this time, I realized something was very wrong in this realm of reason.
what's the source video with the green timeline graphics?
dollarsignfrodofan77 1 week ago
in order for something to be scientifically, acepted, it has to be repetitive, and you fools can't even travel the space to see if laws of phisycs are the same here as in the ends of the creation,,,, nop i believe in the word of God. and shall see soon who is right
albusai 4 months ago
@albusai Off you go into space and test the laws of physics. You'd be doing a great service to mankind. :)
BlackSabbath86 3 months ago
Exhausted for now.
My brain wants to leap out of my head for subjecting it the the disgusting creatard fragments in your videos.
Can't wait to see Part 6 when I eventually regain my sanity.
craniorectalectomist 6 months ago
The movie clip you show is entertaining, but it is, itself, a bit inaccurate, with the new widely accepted theory about the formation of our moon. A smaller planetoid collided with the earth, and struck at an 'angle', and not once but twice. This not only unbalanced the proto-earth, but forced the earth to form again in a sense. Thus the land mass referred to in that video clip didn't happen until "Earth Mark II" had formed. :)
xenxander 7 months ago
"The contenents had arrived" Did anyone else have a mentle vision of a cartoon of a contenant walking through a door saying "sup".
Disthron 10 months ago
I find the actual creation of the Earth to be far more interesting and explanatory than Genesis could ever hope to be. The newly-formed Earth, essentially a big fireball, would be too much of a violent and inhospitable hell for any human to survive. In fact, nothing but the hardiest microbes would have a fighting chance at survival in an environment like that.
Akira625 11 months ago
I seem to be late to the party, but I'm loving these vids
13Penguins 11 months ago
As a lifelong atheist, I appreciate your knowledge of the bible. I've read it. The whole damn thing. You are doing something I cannot do. Scientifically disprove the bible. I say I cannot because the book makes no sense to me. Talking donkey's and snakes? Four corners on a sphere?
Excellent videos, I'm sure the vote bots are on their way.
jmcanoy1860 1 year ago 3
It's funny how Creationists try to use granite rock as evidence for a 6,000 year old Earth yet fail to realize a long process of cooling is what created grantite rock, and it isn't 6,000 years old. Did they pay attention in Geology class? Basic Geology could disprove Genesis.
HybridD91 1 year ago 2
Excellent work!!!! Very interesting and informative. Well done Sir!
flyingfisbeefilms 1 year ago
I really enjoyed this series & I look forward to watching your other videos. I subscribed & sent a friend request.
trknadam 1 year ago
Thank you so very much for this work. It is so greatly appreciated.
pianodavy 1 year ago 18
@pianodavy Well, thank you very much for those kind words! Keeps me motivated to work them to the end! Whew!
brettppalmer 1 year ago
@brettppalmer there are some holes in your theory also and i am not defending the bible it sounds good my question is where are your facts/? to back your claims .I know the bible has contridictions and unsolved mysteries in it, the mistake that I believe christians and scientist make is that they put God on a human level and your explanations are against men who claim that this is God's word and if God is all the we believe then the problem is with the them and not God
9liveslef 1 year ago
@9liveslef I'm not sure I follow you, but I understand the restraints of this comment section. Please send me a personal note (either here on YouTube or via my email) and I can better engage your questions.
brettppalmer 1 year ago
@brettppalmer pls, the name of the documentary .. ? :D
nilacuivil 7 months ago
Great Video!! I'm going to have to go back & watch 1-4 when I have a little extra time. I really enjoyed this. Your videos are very informative & educational for those of us who, like most christians, know little about the bible. Thanks... glad I subbed!
sheri226 1 year ago
Are you sure the water thing at the beginning can't be interpreted as accurate?
Perhaps it was referring to a "fluid" in the broadest sense of the word. You could think of the quantum vacuum/plenum as a kind of fluid.
Starbat88 1 year ago
@Starbat88 He's using a literal translation from the original Hebrew. Even so, that would take a special kind of mental gymnastics to reconcile such an obvious inconsistency.
lowcomedy 1 year ago
@lowcomedy Yes, but I'm sure the ancient Hebrews didn't have a word for "quantum plenum", simply because they didn't know about it. Therefore, the best approximation in their primitive culture would be "fluid", or "water".
Use your imagination.
Starbat88 1 year ago
@Starbat88 That's my point. They didn't know. Hardly an indication of a work that was 'divinely inspired'.
lowcomedy 1 year ago 2
@lowcomedy Bingo. Those who say, "Well, the ancient Hebrews didn't have a word for...." fall into two camps (and often have mattresses in both). One is the camp that forgets the book was supposed to have been divinely inspired from omniscience; the other is the camp of those who don't know biblical Hebrew and so haven't researched if there really WAS a better word/phrase that could have been used.
brettppalmer 1 year ago 6
@brettppalmer And both camps fail in ways that can only be described with multi variable calculus, where the universal constant is x which equals = FAIL! and y is equal to the lulz we get from laughing at them.
lowcomedy 1 year ago
@brettppalmer
The Hebrews didn't have a word for "platypus" or a word for "igloo" or a word for "basketball". If they did, Genesis would be even more entertaining.
AlanCFA 1 year ago
@Starbat88: "Use your imagination"
That pretty much sums up Genesis.
AlanCFA 1 year ago 2
@Starbat88 Yeah, or maybe it was referring tot Yahweh's magic semen.
RHYMEMAIDEN1 1 year ago
You inspired me to re-read Genesis. Lol its funny cuz it contradicts itself so much in those first chapters its amazing people believe what comes after it. Then i understand but now, with all we know... just doesn't makes sense.
BADAZZociation 1 year ago
@BADAZZociation That's how it started for me too. Atheist showed me stuff in the Bible nobody ever pointed out directly before. Do you remember in the hall, or at book studies, when they'd read something weird from the Bible, and then they'd tell some outlandish hypothetical story to make it sound logical? Even during this time, I realized something was very wrong in this realm of reason.
anzwertree 1 year ago
First to post... yay!
Love watching your vids man.
secularheathen 1 year ago