Koolhaas lives in the world of style, his buildings are fucking useless, Casa da musica in Porto is the most insulting lump of concrete I have ever experienced, anyone who has any consideration about architecture will know that OMA buildings are totally devoid of architectural merit. hence the phrase Remtard.
@MrLearntoread@MrLearntoread Rem Koolhaas' is an icon rationalist architect. His works are both provocative and explicit. It's an in your face "bigness" that challenges contemporary conventions. If you actually study architecture and not just whine about something you don't know, he is modern day Le Corusier, except better, because he actually built many of the buildings he professes. Many of the youngest firms with great potential were one employee of OMA. FOA, BIG, MVRDV and more.
@MrLearntoread@MrLearntoread Rem Koolhaas' is an icon rationalist architect. His works are both provocative and explicit. It's an in your face "bigness" that challenges contemporary conventions. If you actually study architecture and not just whine about something you don't know, he is modern day Le Corusier, except better, because he actually built many of the buildings he professes. Many of the youngest firms with great potential were one employee of OMA. FOA, BIG, MVRDV and more.
@colour24 Le Corbusier built an entire City, Chandigarh. If I ever meet you in person and you tell me that Koolhaas is better than Le Corbusier, I will punch you in the mouth.
@yifanoverthere KOOLHAAS STOLE THE DESIGN FROM A JEWISH ARCHITECT PETER EISENMAN AND CHANGED A LITTLE BIT . IF THERE IS ANY SEXUAL INNOTATION, THAT IS BECAUSE HE HAD TO MAKE SOMETHING UP TO SHOW THAT HE DESIGN THE BUILDING, NOT COPYING FROM SOMEONE ELSE. IF YOU FINGER THROUGH SOME OF THE OLD ARCHITECTURAL MAGAZINES, YOU WILL SEE THE ORIGINAL DESIGN IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE CCTV BUILDING EXCEPT THE SKIN. IF THIS BUILDING IS ABOUT SEXUAL ORGANS, IT IS JUST THAT KOOLHAAS HAD PUT IN A FEMALE RUBBER.
Remment Koolhaas is a very softhearted man.
kerrypentlow 5 months ago
Koolhaas lives in the world of style, his buildings are fucking useless, Casa da musica in Porto is the most insulting lump of concrete I have ever experienced, anyone who has any consideration about architecture will know that OMA buildings are totally devoid of architectural merit. hence the phrase Remtard.
MrLearntoread 1 year ago
@MrLearntoread @MrLearntoread Rem Koolhaas' is an icon rationalist architect. His works are both provocative and explicit. It's an in your face "bigness" that challenges contemporary conventions. If you actually study architecture and not just whine about something you don't know, he is modern day Le Corusier, except better, because he actually built many of the buildings he professes. Many of the youngest firms with great potential were one employee of OMA. FOA, BIG, MVRDV and more.
colour24 10 months ago
@colour24 How can you call a rationalist buildings useless? Go read.
colour24 10 months ago
@MrLearntoread @MrLearntoread Rem Koolhaas' is an icon rationalist architect. His works are both provocative and explicit. It's an in your face "bigness" that challenges contemporary conventions. If you actually study architecture and not just whine about something you don't know, he is modern day Le Corusier, except better, because he actually built many of the buildings he professes. Many of the youngest firms with great potential were one employee of OMA. FOA, BIG, MVRDV and more.
colour24 10 months ago
@colour24 Le Corbusier built an entire City, Chandigarh. If I ever meet you in person and you tell me that Koolhaas is better than Le Corbusier, I will punch you in the mouth.
MrLearntoread 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrLearntoread How can you call a rationalist buildings useless? Go read.
colour24 10 months ago
what a remtard
MrLearntoread 1 year ago
Tag
mariomadayag 1 year ago
This is one of the great buildings in the world. Truly revolutionary. It seems like the Chinese can engineer and built anything!
jewishwarrior666 1 year ago
@jewishwarrior666 i agree!!!
jaandhruv 1 year ago
Finally a documentary that is all about the process of architecture in it's real way
marianstefan1 2 years ago
The first consideration about this building was surely not its functionality but the meaning of sculpt. Koolhaas fooled almost all of Chinese.
This building is about sexual organs.
yifanoverthere 2 years ago
??? what?
tsuikjoshiomatsu 2 years ago
@yifanoverthere KOOLHAAS STOLE THE DESIGN FROM A JEWISH ARCHITECT PETER EISENMAN AND CHANGED A LITTLE BIT . IF THERE IS ANY SEXUAL INNOTATION, THAT IS BECAUSE HE HAD TO MAKE SOMETHING UP TO SHOW THAT HE DESIGN THE BUILDING, NOT COPYING FROM SOMEONE ELSE. IF YOU FINGER THROUGH SOME OF THE OLD ARCHITECTURAL MAGAZINES, YOU WILL SEE THE ORIGINAL DESIGN IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE CCTV BUILDING EXCEPT THE SKIN. IF THIS BUILDING IS ABOUT SEXUAL ORGANS, IT IS JUST THAT KOOLHAAS HAD PUT IN A FEMALE RUBBER.
georgewu5 1 year ago
the sound is out of sync with Rem and Ole talking!
jad376 3 years ago
cool
3dlegoman 3 years ago