Added: 3 years ago
From: Fordenergy
Views: 6,467
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • EXCELLENT design! Since most vehicles are 12v systems, what kind of results will this unit achieve a 12v test?? The average Joe isn't gonna hook up another battery in series to get 24v, plus even if they did, it's another unnecessary added expense. Just thinking in terms of a more practical application.

    Appreciate the research!

  • See Series Cell 3.1 for a 12 volts system

  • That's a great cell Mr Ford! Ilike the design.

  • Thank you

  • Really?

  • If you wanted to produce the hydrogen separately, how would you do it??

  • Oddssodds use pvc in a U shape and a metal that resists corrosion. Production is not as good but current is lower anyway. I have a cell that separates. I'll try to get mine online soon.

  • You can seperate the anode and cathode by a membrane or you can put opposing electro magnets on eaither side of your bubbler and that will push the hydrogen to one side and let the oxygen flow to the other.

  • Is that true?

  • Yes

    You can see a design diagram in the D9 document under the Zack West Electrolizer. And also UserName732492 has shown it in his video HHO Test4a

  • Thanks Brother!

  • what is EDMS gasket?

    I would like to seal my acrylic container i'm building right now.

    Thanks.

  • EDMS is gasket material you can buy at your local gasket manafacturer (Yellow Pages). It works great in caustic environments and comes in various thicknesses which makes it great for flat gasket needs. You can also use shower liner (Home Warehouse Store) if you need an immediate source but you are limited to one thickness. You can also use the black round gastets like from your hardware store but again your limited to what they have. Hope this helps

    Good luck on your build

    Ford_Energy

  • Your work is very exciting sir. I am planning to try certain ideas. If you don't mind. How does this current cell compare to the ver 2.1 double helix and ver 1.8 double helix ?

    thanks for the info.

    dart

  • The sealed cells are suited to automobile setups, no wet sumps, completely sealed system and expandable to your needs. The DH Cells are suited for stand alone systens like a generator, house heater, etc. They are more efficient but harder to contain.

  • Great work Ford!

  • sir i think your science is right on the nose, but would it be possible for you to record your findings in a manner that excludes the ambient sounds of a happy household, i hope you dont take offence but what you have to say i want to listen to.

    tony

  • Thanks Tony, that was actually the 3rd video I did because my boys want in on the action. So actually that in the quiet version. If theres anything you didnt catch please ask I would be happy to help.

    Ford_Energy

  • Good job! 4.6MMW is pretty good. I've not tried a dry cell like yours yet but I've read that sealing the edges around the holes in the plates somehow will help increase your efficiency.

    I also liked your building technique that was shown at the end there. Very much similar to my own.

    Stu :)

  • based on my calculations your cell is about 49% efficient 18*25*29/3600= 3.625WattHours 2.4 is 100% so 3.625-2.4= 1.225 1.225/2.4= 0.5104166=51% 100%-51%= 49% efficient which is pretty darn good most kits out there are only about 15-20% efficient and sell any ware from $400 to over $1,000 cant wait to see more keep up the great work "LIVE THE HYDROGEN DREAM"

  • Thanks for providing the calculation there - can you tell me what makes 2.4 the 100% figure? I'm confused at to what this actually means? Thanks :)

  • woops sorry its 2.15 not 2.4 got figures at overunity(.)com

    1 liter of hho gas produces 7744 joules of energy 1 joule is 1 watt second 7744/3600= 2.15 watthours of energy so for 100% efficiency your cell must only use 2.15 watthours of energy to make 1 liter of hho gas.

    heres the calc

    volts x amps x time in seconds /3600(1 hour in seconds)= the watthours than you - 2.15 than / 2.15 that gives you how much extra energy you are using and - that from 100 to get the % of efficiency

  • sorry heres the fix

    3.625-2.15/2.15= 0.6860465- 1.00= 0.3139535

    31.3% efficient which is still quite good overunity(.)com first calc said 2.4 but after further reading it actualy 2.15

  • Oh I see now,

    Thanks for that, very interesting stuff!

    Stu :)

    Sorry for Hijacking your comments Fordenergy! :)

  • looks pretty damn good to me ... if I got your numbers right, 18v, 25a, 1 liter in 22 seconds, it appears you are doing a bit better than 6 mililiters per minute per watt ... that aint too shabby ... think that puts your device in the top 5% for efficiency I have ever seen ...

  • Thanks for your help you were right the power supply was killing the cell. I also love that you say top 5 but it's not that good. I re-checked the time with the video and it was 28-29 sec per liter. But now I can expand on this and see where it can go.

  • Yeah, if was really 29 seconds, then you are at about 4.6 mmw which seems to be more typical for this type of device. The original Tero Ranta device reportedly got low 6's for mmw using a single hole to support fluid flow ... best I have gotten out of mine is about 5 mmw but it averages more like 4-4.5 ... so you are certainly in the game, but we both have some room for improvment ...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more