So God is Perfect. He made the Bible... oh and the "Beginner's Guide to the Bible" where he suggests with Bold and Italics the sections that we should see through literal or metaphorical eyes.
One question... Why isn't this Handbook given from God, in the Top Ten most read Books list?
@LivonianKnight Sorry, I wrote this pretty tired and frustrated. I knew that, what I meant was... Why isn't the "Beginner's Guide to the Bible" on the top ten list. If there is a method in which it is meant to be read, shouldn't we be told this literally.
Since the Bible is in the Top Ten, and it susceptible to interpretation... Can we put a Book in the top ten that tells us how to interpret, what to interpret and when to interpret? Or is this interpretation also susceptible to interpretation.
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
It's funny how idiotic they make the atheist (or Christian actor) look. SO basically this blue shirted guy is saying that the book of Genesis is not supposed to be literally interpreted?
@TheMilkshakePoem Agreed. People read the bible and, because they have no capacity to think, they take everything literally. Look at scientology. That's an entire religion based upon a science-fiction novel. Religion isn't the problem. Humanity is the problem, or rather, certain dominant groups of people that are herded like sheep.
So the postmodern atheist/skeptic gets to use objective science to test or falsify christianity ? but all the Christian has is his meta narrative or subjective story to respond back? sounds like postmodern evangelicals have been duped very badly. Then you claim the bible is not making statements that can be tested scientifically ? When everyone knows it is making all kinds of claims that can be tested ? If you can't trust Bible at all on scientific claims why trust it with your eternal soul ?
So God is Perfect. He made the Bible... oh and the "Beginner's Guide to the Bible" where he suggests with Bold and Italics the sections that we should see through literal or metaphorical eyes.
One question... Why isn't this Handbook given from God, in the Top Ten most read Books list?
JustATheist 4 months ago
@JustATheist Did you really just ask that question? The Bible is the worlds' largest selling book.
LivonianKnight 3 months ago
@LivonianKnight Sorry, I wrote this pretty tired and frustrated. I knew that, what I meant was... Why isn't the "Beginner's Guide to the Bible" on the top ten list. If there is a method in which it is meant to be read, shouldn't we be told this literally.
Since the Bible is in the Top Ten, and it susceptible to interpretation... Can we put a Book in the top ten that tells us how to interpret, what to interpret and when to interpret? Or is this interpretation also susceptible to interpretation.
JustATheist 3 months ago
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
erutis53 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
erutis53 5 months ago
science prove the existance of god and NO WHERE in the bible does it say the bible is a few thousand yrs old and as for the dinosaurs the bible says there was life before man
erutis53 5 months ago
Science neither proves or disproves anything.
Hotwatty 1 year ago
It's funny how idiotic they make the atheist (or Christian actor) look. SO basically this blue shirted guy is saying that the book of Genesis is not supposed to be literally interpreted?
KillTheRevolution 2 years ago
bible is good with science. What's wrong with the bible is the people who read it.
TheMilkshakePoem 2 years ago
@TheMilkshakePoem Agreed. People read the bible and, because they have no capacity to think, they take everything literally. Look at scientology. That's an entire religion based upon a science-fiction novel. Religion isn't the problem. Humanity is the problem, or rather, certain dominant groups of people that are herded like sheep.
PissOffRoth 9 months ago
lol all the christian has to do is super impose their religion over any part of science to make it compatible? thats crap
1720andrew1720 2 years ago
Horrible.
1711Acts 2 years ago
So the postmodern atheist/skeptic gets to use objective science to test or falsify christianity ? but all the Christian has is his meta narrative or subjective story to respond back? sounds like postmodern evangelicals have been duped very badly. Then you claim the bible is not making statements that can be tested scientifically ? When everyone knows it is making all kinds of claims that can be tested ? If you can't trust Bible at all on scientific claims why trust it with your eternal soul ?
grandconjunct 3 years ago
The bible was written in pre-scientific times - these are different genres.
mistawulf 3 years ago
so do you believe Jesus was "literally" raised from the dead...?
jesseakers 3 years ago
The problem is not the bit about the arm, but rather the bit about God coming "down."
ProfMTH 3 years ago