The L Word - honest homophobe

[pepsiforever1]

@northermight- You know what I find sickening? YOU. The guys is not saying anything bad? REALLY!? Why do you even watch is show? You do not go to a party where you are a guest in someone's home and disrespect them, their friends, and their family. THAT is the problem with the world- loud mouthed, ignorant, ilow-class dopes that don't know when to shut the hell up!

[mecchiboi94]

Omg

[Northernmight]

W..ow.. Propaganda, much? <.< If some people don't like homosexuals, they are allowed to not like homosexuals.. What the fuck is wrong with this? you are now required to like homosexuals? .. That's kinda sickening. The fella wasn't even saying anything offensive at all, and he is being set up as a bad example? fucking America..

[extazeeee]

My english is not enough can you uys telle what is Angus sayin??

[Miakosamuio]

@extazeeee Angus says "It's not that bad actually. That whole dick in ass thing. I used to think it was a little creepy, and painful too, but I discovered this great lube called "boy butter" and once I discovered that I was like [mimes sex noises] let's get this party started!"

[MsBlateration]

i love all of bette's facial expressions in this episode. JB is such a great actress

[theballer900]

but once i discovered this lube its called boy butter i was like Khmcsskmcss :D Let's get this party started

[missAngid11]

1:39-1:43 -- Simply AWwww ... BETTE <3

[PrincessPeach777]

omg I LOVE BETTE. She doesn't just defend lesbians, she's ALL FOR Gay men too!

[brindabellaoffroad]

He kinda got some points...

[GyThanksGd]

Homophobes are pointless!

[KAELAFLAWLESS23]

1:30... angus is hilarious

[LTDViperDeli]

Terrible show.

[MrSusejtsirhc]

Same sex satanic. The devil is a murderer a liar and a thief.

[angelcity6]

Bette and Tine are so cute together! <3

[apeirce20]

When are people going to understand the fact that someone being attracted to a member of the same sex isn't a choice they come to at a point in their life. It happens because of genetics and/or the environment they grew up in. "Being gay is wrong" is such a fucking ironic statement, it makes me 'facepalm' every time i see/hear it. Honestly you dumb fucking homophobes, are you really that closed minded and braindead enough to believe there are people different than you?

[MrSusejtsirhc]

@apeirce20 WHAT A LOAD OF BULL RIGHT FROM THE PIT OF HELL

[apeirce20]

@MrSusejtsirhc What a failure at trolling.

[MrSusejtsirhc]

THIS IS HOW SICK THE WORLD WHO REJECTS THE LORDSHIP AND ATHORITY OF JESUS IS AND ITS GONNA GET MUCH WORSE. THEY WANTED THIER SIN AND NOT GOD SO THERE REWARD IS COMMING. I HOPE THEY LIKE A LOT OF HORROR TORMENT PAIN AND FIRE THAT DOES NOT STOP. HELL IS NOT GOING TO BE FUN

[mortulu]

@MrSusejtsirhc If you DO wanna make the world a better place, go to a third wirld country and build a school or support a resocialization program for ex-prisoners.. and stop watching lezzy TV series until you forget to turn off your beloved Caps button.

[floral5]

@MrSusejtsirhc shut the fuck up

[mermaidsareppl222]

@MrSusejtsirhc there is no god, so they chose to live their life as they were born to

[luno44]

Does the kid at least know her male doner? The humanoid who makes up half her genetic code. And has a soul, and a name.

[mudpiegirl]

@luno44 If it were an infertile straight couple who went to a sperm bank, they'd still call the biological father "the donor." That's why sperm banks exist. The people who donate know that.

[luno44]

@mudpiegirl Does a kid, raised by an infertile straight couple, made using a donor, know anything about the biological father? The person who makes up half their genetic code. If everyone's so convinced that the donor's biological influence is completely irrelevant in the kid, that blows away the argument that a rape victim who gets pregnant can abort the fetus because the kid will have the raper's DNA.

[mudpiegirl]

@luno44 I'm not understanding the point of your comment or what you're trying to say. My only point was that it's not just same-sex couples who use sperm banks or anonymous donors, and in the case of straight couples who need help, I doubt they refer to the donor as the "father" either. Whether or not the parents or child want to know more about the donor later is a different subject.

[ivasenko48]

@thegr8danwhite No, that is incorrect. Seeing as I spent 6 years doing my MBBS, I think I've done enough research.

[thegr8danwhite]

@ivasenko48 Give me the day that Linda Evans died of aids. Hudson even had gay diseases as far back as when he was married to phyllis gates, did she die of a gay man's disease? I invite you to view the video on my channel and see who's been spreading the disease. Do more research, again it's easist to be transmitted during male to male sexual contact. Send me supposed research! then I'll be happy to send you mind! We'll see who's bluffin.

[ivasenko48]

@thegr8danwhite

1. You deal realise you're making a fool out of yourself arguing with someone with an MBBS, don't you?

2. Why on earth would I send you all of my research? That would take quite a long time, and it would be a waste of time. You probably wouldn't even read it.

3. A piece of advice: go and get some education on the matter before you start expounding your nonsense and embarrassing yourself.

[thegr8danwhite]

@ivasenko48

1. One need not have any degree to witness what's been going on with this disease. It's a gay man's disease and U know it. 2. Why on earth don't you send me the research? Cuz you don't have it and you're lying. I have all the time in the world to read it if it exists!

3. A piece of advice: turn away from that disgusting diseased lifestyle. It's a problem, it's a sickness, IT'S A PERVERSION!

[ivasenko48]

@thegr8danwhite

1. Actually, in order to understand this to the extent that I do, you do need a MBBS degree!

2. a. You wouldn't read it, because I wrote these notes when completing my degree, and the medical terminology and detail would be rather irksome for you

b. If you could be bothered to read all of it and put in the reseach to understand all of the references, then you would not acknowledge that you read it as it would contradict your lunacy.

[thegr8danwhite]

@ivasenko48 That sure is a lot of fancy words for you to say that you're lying and you just don't have the information to bk up your claim, lol. Just send it, fruitcake. I'm intelligent enough to read and understand medical and legal terminology. Does one need a law degree to understand legal terminology? No.

You try to hide behind these words. Why don't you use your influence to go out among your fella gay perverts and petition all the bathhouses close down indefinately. That's the 1st step.

[ivasenko48]

@thegr8danwhite

1. You are intelligent to understand proper medical terminology? Somehow, I don't think so.

2. Although, unlike you, I do not have a problem with homosexuals or what they do, I am not one myself.

3. Your intolerance and lack of intellect is rather concerning. Are you a member of the WBC? You sound like one.

[xyz702]

@thegr8danwhite Where on EARTH do you get your facts? Wow. Just wow.

[thegr8danwhite]

@xyz702 Just google search it. There are all kinds of facts on the internet backing my claims.

[xyz702]

@thegr8danwhite To be honest, I have a tendency to loose interest in discussions when I have too many criticisms to fit into one youtube comment. Have a nice day.

[geofreyr]

Interesting how all television shows stigmatise the person against homosexuality and glorify the person for it.

[sexyflores619]

God I hate homophobes, such fucking cunts! Anyways Bette was funny "an honest homophobe how nice" lol

[chariit0]

Bette: "A Honest Jomophobe how nice" hash ilovebette

[XKrisz]

Love Bette!! <3

[bluedooke]

@thegr8danwhite oh god how more wrong can u get

[thegr8danwhite]

@bluedooke Oh God, I wish I was wrong but I'm not. Please prove to me that I'm wrong. Prove to me that gay men's bathhouses don't exist. Prove to me that male to male sex isn't dangerous!

[bluedooke]

@thegr8danwhite troll 

[thegr8danwhite]

@bluedooke Fag!

[TheChosenKid]

@thegr8danwhite Male to Male Sex Is just as Dangerous as Male to Female Sex...No offense, but you'd be a naive fool to not believe that...

[thegr8danwhite]

@TheChosenKid Not according to the Center for Disease Control. Gay men are 44 times more likely to be infected with HIV than straights, this is a fact. Why is it against the law in many nations for gay men to donate blood???

[knight7se7en]

@TheChosenKid: Show me one credible source of information documenting this fact. You must kidding yourself if you believe this to be true.

[katje24]

Sodomy is a term used in the law to describe the act of "unnatural" sex, which depending on jurisdiction can be one or more of oral sex, anal sex or bestiality.

Sodomy refers to sexual actions, and everybody is entitled to have an opinion about that, but it has nothing to do with love. Let people love whoever they want, respect it and if you do want to refer to the Bible or Koran then read what it means,not what is written! Happiness is relative and different for everyone..Just enjoy life!

[katje24]

In a world where entire families die by natural phenomena, like earthquakes, and floods.there are still people who think love isn´t such a natural thing. Whether it´s love between men and women or same-sex,love is a feeling you can´t dodge, and you certainly can´t control it. A feeling is real and so is love. People who still think love between same sexes isn´t healthy or isn´t natural,are usually people who are not open-minded/tunnelvision.

[bandfan1234]

@danmole78 The risks of catching STDs and HIV are the same, whether or not it is between two women, two men or a woman and a men. There are always risks when having sex. Ill also add thats its people like you that believe homosexuality is wrong that is why so many places are full of hatred towards anyone different from themselves. You should also know that being gay/bi is not a choice, you are born gay/bi.

[jereamygrayrose]

Why do people think if they don't understand something they are entitled to write it off as wrong? Because they were raised thinking they deserve the privilege of judging other people. Those people thinking they should define what is normal or good for all others are mistaken. Educate yourself.

[Alfacuria]

what exactly is the L word?

[knight7se7en]

@Alfacuria: Only one of the most socially important television shows to come into existence.

[danmol78]

There is simply no comparison between healthy, natural heterosexual sex & homosexual sodomy. From the moment one man sodomizes another he is destroying the cells in the other mans anal cavity. Furthermore, it is so unhealthy that during the act, one man can actually give the other man a prolapsed rectum. Dont the overwhelming AIDS statistics speak to you liberals?

[neonka070889]

@danmol78

Since when ANY kind of sex is healthy? And since when homosexual sex isn't natural?

[phantomsluva]

@neonka070889 You really believe that sex isn't healthy?

[neonka070889]

@phantomsluva I was referring to that: "Furthermore, it is so unhealthy that during the act, one man can actually give the other man a prolapsed rectum.". Sex is good, but you can get VD, STD, HIV. Sex could cause vaginal damage and could be dangerous if you have heart failure or asthma etc... So in my opinion: sex is NOT TOTALLY healthy.

[danmol78]

It is not compassionate to let people do what they want when it is harming them. A womans uterus knows her own husbands sperm! It is a beautiful & natural act. It is healthy & natural. Liberalism is based on reason. Why would you want 2 people to engage in unhealthy acts, & want children to grow up in a less healthy environment than what nature intended?

[BlackRepublican2010]

There's no normalizing the abnormal no matter how hard they try.

[danmol78]

Its NONSENSE to think anyone with a different opinion that yours is intolerant or judgmental or hateful or has a phobia.

[JL1Naruto]

the guy at the end is cool.

[liw213]

@thkaal1 Really?I thought there was a difference.

Homosexuals:Men

Lesbians:Women

Maybe Im wrong,I dont know..*shurgs*

[neonka070889]

@liw213 Well...

Women - lesbians

Men - gays

Homosexuals - lesbians & gays

:-| ...

[neonka070889]

@thkaal1

That's the point. Homophobes are f****d up hypocrites

[liw213]

Yeah,that is something too..

You killer Homophobes hate Homosexuals,but you dont mind two Lesbians making out.

Why is that?

[neonka070889]

Because most of Homophobes thinks that lesbians are sweet... And straight guys loves "lesbian porn" :-|

[fidget68]

Haha, I need to watch this show. I've got it on my Netflix instant queue, and it looks pretty good. Is it as good as Queer as Folk?

[blanet81]

I miss The L Word!!!

[WhiteFlowerLei1976]

I love Bette response about how the homophobe cares more about his own comfort level than about his sons happiness

[adoptatellytubbie]

i always love bette comebacks they are so witty

[XjussyX92]

Angus is the best!

[rachael198]

how have i never seen that scene before?

[star0shadows]

I love how Bette's like "Oh bitch no you did not just go there..." at 0:41 :D

[roxusan]

As offended as I am by the so-called "honest homophobe," I think he was trying to start a dialogue. He doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed, by the woman's reaction discourages any sort of dialogue from happening. Sometimes, it's better to have honest straight-talk than politically correct discomfort.

[lector0003]

it was the wrong setting to have that debate ...

[roxusan]

lector0003--- Where is the right setting? Given by the reaction of the man who boasted about trying gay sex, this seems like a meeting of people who are familiar with each other. Making the gay child-rearing issue a non-issue won't ease homophobic tensions. Yes, responsible adults should have the right to raise their own children without having their relationship challenged. But lack of knowledge about what it means to be gay encourages homophobia. Honest conversations can dispell myths.

[lector0003]

What I mean, is that it was party and a casual one at that. There are a bunch of gays and lesbians there and tbh I wouldn't even bring it up ...

Anyway, the discussion has been done to death and revealed how much of bigotted fool the fat guy was. I don't get what else anyone was supposed, in what was clearly an awkward situation.

[roxusan]

lector0003- The discussion, apparently, still needs to be done. In CA, Prop 8 passed despite the crowds of "enlightened" people. Turns out, many people didn't know why they should vote 'no'. They kept quiet among the gays they knew, even pretending to support them just to prevent awkward situations. A few awkward situations might clarify a lot of confusion. That way, instead of people talking past each other or avoiding the subject all-together, we have a dialogue going on.

[divineaglaia]

that man wasn't trying to start a dialogue, he was trying to attack her. you don't start a constructuve dialogue on the subject by telling a stranger, "i'm sure your parents would rather you not be gay" -- that is however the way to piss someone whose homophobic father just died off -- which is exactly why bette responded that way.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- Constructive dialogues don't always start in politically correct or comfortable ways. Giving someone attitude may be satisfying in the short run, but it is not productive. Gays and enlightened gay-rights supporters aren't the only people who vote, and many heterosexuals act in homophobic ways because they simply don't know any better. Bette had the chance to provide an alternate way of thinking about gay rights, not just to that one "honest homophobe," but to her other party guests

[divineaglaia]

roxusan -- Constructive dialogue doesn't always start in comfortable ways, but you're definitely abating your chances of having one when you offend someone. The onus isn't on every gay and enlightened gay rights supporter to start a dialogue with every uninformed heterosexual, regardless of the insulting insinuations hurled their way. It's not about whether that man knows about gay rights, but whether Bette's reaction was warranted given the insolent way he approached her.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- A hostile reaction may be understandable, but it's never warranted. Even if it's given under a time of extreme stress, that doesn't make hostility acceptable. Children are taught not to be hostile and to work out their problems. Bette is a mother. She should know a few things about the harm hostility can do, and set an example. The man seemed hostile, but that's no reason to be hostile in return. Also, if you believe in something, you should be able to explain it and defend it.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan -- I believe Bette's reaction is completely justified. You say that type of reaction is never warranted, but if you called me a n***** (I'm black), would you really expect me to start a dialogue with you about the perils of racism, or do you think I would be justified in feeling offended and calling you...let's say... "an honest racist" in return. I actually applaud Bette, because she reacted rather mildly considering his combative approach and her father's recent death.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- No one here has called you the N word, and no one has called her a dyke. I'm an Israeli-Amercan Jew, and I've been called plenty of things. But that doesn't give any of us the right to lash out. That person did not address her with a slur; he simply asked a provocative question. Her lewd and hostile answer, while understandable, is not helpful, insightful, or informative. These kinds of answers don't change minds. I pity Bette for her situatuion, but I don't applaud her weak reply.

[divineaglaia]

did I say anyone called me the n word? u may understand my remark better if you read the comment more closely, like u may hear just how insightful bette's answer really is if you actually listen to it entirely. no one's saying bette answered the question with stoic perfection, as you demand, but that given her history and his hostility her defensive reaction was justified. plus, first you said the guy was "hostile", now u say he "simply asked a provocative question." which is it?

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- You said "but if you called me a n*****" This refers to me, and I have read each of your posts, noting that very few of them answer mine. I listened to Bette's answer in this scene, and it is angry and vindictive, not insightful. I did not say anything about stoic perfection. Perhaps you should reread my comments. Like violence, hostility is not justified or warranted, even when it is understandable. And, a provocative question can be hostile, the two are not mutually exclusive.

[divineaglaia]

u said he "simply" asked a provocative question, which has a different connotation than "he asked a provocative question with hostility." and there's an "if" in my n-word question, meaning i didn't say u did, but presented a conditional statement. is English your first language? and Bette's not being "violent," she's justifiably defensive. u may get some insight if you listen to her talk about comfort vs. happiness. or were u too concerned w/judging her emotional response to grasp the concept?

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- I know the difference between something justified and something sympathetic, as well as the fact that "you" isn't spelled "u." Your prejudice about my "first language" is not amusing, but your grammar is. Saying "if you did" assumes I might do something, or am capable of doing it. Yet, what if I were African American? You probably did not take that into account. You also did not address my point that one cannot be "justifiably defensive" in response to a provocative question.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan -- I must say I'm disappointed. I'd believed you would respond to my "simply asking a provocative question" about your English with the same welcoming affectation and unaffected wisdom that you so decidedly demand of Bette. But your refusal to answer the question and mocking criticism of my shorthand doesn't lend to a "constructive dialogue" on the matter. I hope you're holding yourself to the same standard that you hold Bette, or could you be graciously proving my point?

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- I am not a hypocrite. I answered your question by pointing out examples that show how my English is better than yours. I don't know what else you were expecting. I did not have an Israeli friend mock you (like Bette's gay friend), or call you a bigot. Yet; why did you ask a question you already had the answer to? If I didn't speak English fluently or understand it, I wouldn't be debating you for several days on end. My answer is not hypocritical, and you have yet to show how it is.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan- I'm happy you've decided to finally live up to your own standard, in part, and engage in a constructive dialogue on my question on your English, though you still lack that unaffected wisdom you demand of Bette. I asked because I thought it was common knowledge that conditional clauses can be used for hypotheticals not likely to happen. You didn't understand this, which either meant English is not your first language or you were being intentionally dense to conjure up a red herring.

[roxusan]

I never demanded unaffected wisdom; I criticized Bette for lashing out. I did not lash out at you, I pointed out that you were wrong. Lashing out is never a warranted/ justified way to answer a provocative question. Also, hypothetical clauses imply something is capable of happening, not that something won't happen. They simulate a potential situation; by using this clause, you assume the situation you are referring to can or might happen. That's why "you" is rarely used in hypothetical examples.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan- Here's a little English lesson on conditional clauses for you. It's called an "unreal or hypothetical condition," used when "when you want to discuss an unlikely situation." Here's little English lesson on the use of you: it can be used for the person you're addressing or "any person: equivalent in sense to indefinite one, ex: you can never be sure!" Get a dictionary. Read it. Get a Strunk and White. Study it. Get the L Word on DVD. Watch it....or just use Google.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan-you have yet to address two of my points. write verbatim what "provocative question" brad asked. and what did you think about bette's comfort v. happiness comment. did you find it insightful?

[divineaglaia]

and also, i'm realizing now why you may hold so many of the beliefs you do. do you even watch the show? that is not bette's gay friend, that is Kit's (Pam Grier's) boyfriend and Bette only recently met him. He's just helping Bette deflect an uncomfortable situation since she's the only out and adhering homosexual present at the time of the exchange, and gay men are being attacked despite the fact that no gay men are there to defend themselves.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- I am judging this scene, not the entire show. It doesn't matter how long Bette knew Pam's boyfriend, just that she condones his behavior as acceptable (and by behavior, I mean crudely-bragging-about-gay-sex­, not the having-gay-sex-part.) Pushing your sex life in peoples' faces is not an answer to an argument... it's just uncalled for, whatever someone's sexual preference is.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan-you said he was "Bette's gay friend." he's not. you were wrong. i corrected you.

[NH4CHO]

Haha, I have to say I have read through your very entertaining debate here, and it had me hooked (although I doubt that was the purpose). You two bring up some very interesting points, although I must say - divinealgaia, you've won every point. I agree with you completely about the scene and Bette's stance, but well played to both of you. Always refreshing to see that intellectual debates are alive and well!

[nicevidbro]

callate puta.

[roxusan]

Your mother must be proud.

[nicevidbro]

my mother is dead.

[roxusan]

Dogs have short life spans.

[nicevidbro]

Likewise.

[roxusan]

I'm not dead yet. Are you done hurling insults, or are you going to continue trying to kill me with laughter?

[nicevidbro]

You are dead indeed. And I am the who is laughing. Your responses are quite funny. I have you eating from my hand.

[roxusan]

... said the internet tough guy with steals other peoples' comebacks ;)

[nicevidbro]

Aha. Take your pills. Bye. Im over this.

[kkg76]

well said.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- Finally, this scene misses out on any big concept for gay rights. Bette was asked a provocative question which deeply hurt her feelings. It's not clear if the asker intended this, but he definitely did cause hurt feelings. Yet the questions he asked are still on peoples' minds (like the blonde.) It's better to inform people and answer questions than it is to further a comfortable atmosphere where questions remained unresolved, and people remain misinformed.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan - No "provocative" question went unanswered, b/c Brad never even asks a question at all. This was simply an opportunity for him to express his narrow-minded views about homosexuality to a homosexual. You also never addressed Bette's steering the exchange more constructively than Brad started it with her comfort v. happiness comment. And, unlike you, I believe people have the right to be angry and express that anger in controlled way, like becoming "justifiably defensive" when offended.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- Brad professed he is open to the prospect of having a gay son. He might not have every politically correct detail in place, yet he is not narrow-minded. He's more open-minded than many Americans. And he did ask a question: What if the child doesn't want gay parents? What if children with gay parents want to live with their sperm donor/surrogate? Those are not homophobic; they are fair questions. Bette's answer: calling him a homophobe, and encouraging a friend's gay sex account.

[divineaglaia]

roxusan- wrong once again. the blonde lady asks a question and Bette answers her in a polite exchange. Brad jumps in, "I'm sure your parents would rather you not be gay." As offensive a remark as if he'd said "I'm sure your parents would rather you be a better Christian, a boy, or white." If he asks a question, quote it verbatim. Brad is narrow-minded because he assumes Bette's parents would rather she not be gay, though he doesn't even know her, never considering her parents could accept her.

[roxusan]

divineaglaia- Bette is narrow-minded assuming the guy is a homophobe. Homophobic behavior does not turn someone into a homophobe any more than an insult turns someone into a bully. He does not know Bette's relationship with her parents, and offered an assumption as a weak example for his point that some kids may not want gay parents, and some parents may not want gay kids. His inferred question was the same as the woman's: What if the child chooses to live with the sperm donor?

[Jokaanan]

HAHAHAHA best comeback ever

[greenwickedness]

Man hating? The men were insulting them.

[jackietaienao]

they are not man hating. those idiots were acting like jerks so they responded the way anyone else in that situation would.

[orlandobabe]

Okay it is either, they are okay with it or not, you can't be like 'I am okay with girls and girls is hot but two guys are just not for me'. Honeslty, I would send them both home.

[basinik10]

thats cuz ur an homofobic jerk! u should go home and Not be here!;)

[thaliasghost]

ok, I think that reply was uncalled for since what I gather from your comments is that you're the opposite of a homophobe. If I was Tina, I would have thrown these guys out. They behave like ignorant and dumb frat boys.

[orlandobabe]

Is this reply to me or thaliasghost?

[afarm]

AHAHAHAHAHA ANGUS!!!

[PureInfatuation]

I love how they all handled that situation, from Bette being calm, to Tina just sayin 'Bette' when he made the remark about her parents to Angus just bein hilarious. Fuck the homphobes!!

[DarkLiarWoman]

an honest homophobe, how nice!

like this scene a lot!

[butterflyflaming]

Bette and Angus make a great team. lol I love it butter boy

[lessinbeen]

i LOVE this scene!

[buffaith]

Damn Angus! You cracked me up! lmao

[wyrmoftheflame]

Is is just me, or aren't we all just waiting for angstus to come out? Lol, not anymore I guess....

[bitterfly77]

Heh. He played a self-loathing gay serial rapist in an episode of L&O SVU. It was kindof weird in light of this scene (and his role in The L Word in general), but I totally prefer him as the biflexible Kit-lovin' cutie in The L Word.

[shaunaplague]

lol 1 point to mangus for that one

[ymarie]

hahahaha. about the only time i liked, angus.

uhn tiss uhn tiss uhn tiss. hahahaha.

and YES!! Bette, is back.

[colbsterheartsyou]

mangus-1

honest homophobes-0!!

haha

[colbsterheartsyou]

hilarious xDD go mangus! woot.

[enzedbrit]

That's brill! Can't wait for it to come out down here.

[wolffang00762]

lmfao so cool

[ash2146485]

fucking angus!!! lmao, good for him

[Hel19]

i loved this scene mangus did actually make me laugh but yay go bette

[Konvndrvm]

Alpha-Bette is back. And that scene almost makes me forgive Mangus for all of his boring-ness...not quite.