Adm. Burkley had evidence - that is a bombshell - i've never heard of his lawyer's submission. Mr Robert Blakey of HSCA, you absolutely owe us. RIP one hopes the Cold War paradigm - where some second-in-command can use the opponent as his call off excuse (ie LBJ phoning clearances of Russia 22 nov 63) to take the top job. Gen Ike's dear old complex today would patsy up a lone Afghani, firing the wrong way. And stack some evil dudes along an overpass straight ahead. NB Bush cleared Saudis9/11
If you go to thedriverkilledkennedyblogspot com on the web. You will see a blow-up of the Nix film which shows the driver Greer with his arms off the steering wheel something not seen in the altered Zapruder film.
if there was a shooter on the knoll, dont you think abraham zapruder would have heard and/or reacted to a shot being fired just a few yards away from him?
If you accept Oswald acted alone, then everything has to be accepted as a coincidence, since it was not otherwise investigated. The best one I've found was Vice Adm Burkley,MD JFK's personal physician contacting the HSCA through his own lawyer in a registered letter telling them he had evidence of a conspiracy, and there being no follow up about it.
By the way, the gov't "lost" the original Nix film after it was given to it by the Nix family during the 1978 HSCA investigation. So whatever you think you see on the knoll, can't be analyzed anyway, since it's not clear whether it's human movement or a photographic artifact caused by copying the film.
whilst i think if you want to see you will, and it's by no means clear there is definate disruption there, though whether they are bodies it is impossible to tell with any certainty. however, more telling is the behaviour of the 2 motorcycle policemen behind the president's car who come to a halt and seemingly both looking in the very same direction as there is the disturbance. they would have heard the shot, and whether they could actually see anything from their position is debatable.
@rpd281272 also the two motocycle officers catch the presidential limosine whilst stopping.this give support to the theroy the limo slowed to an almost halt and that zapruders film was tampered with as it does not appear like this in the zapruder film.
This is a film of the assassination of JFK taken from the opposite side of the grassy knoll. In this footage Jackie scrambles out of the limo as she is trying to get her a piece of her husband's skull. She is understandably in total shock. One of the main body guards rush to her only to fall off the limo and just barely got on a second time. The powers that be think there was someone behind the fence that shot JFK. Personally, I don't see anything. I wish they would tell us.
We won't truly know all the details until former president George H.W. Bush dies. He's likely one of the last persons from the CIA at that time who is still around and can still be tied to documents from this event.
Appears to show NOTHING of interest to the left of Zapruder who is standing on the concrete block. There is a shape that looks a bit like a guy stood in a firing position on the right side of a convertible in the parking lot - but if that's what it is, he doesn't move after the headshot
@IwshIcldstrtover Again please understand. No one did a bad job here. We are talkiing the early 1960's. Camera's and movie projectors were big bulky items and actually were far ahead of their time back then. I hope this information was helpful to you and others. I was also around back then. That is also why I know this stuff. Your comment though does have merrit. I appreciated your comment. Cheers. :)
@TheJohnlennongirl Professional cameras were pretty good in 1963. But the camera car that was usually in front of JFK during all his other motorcades was placed several cars behind his car, where they could not film JFK, Jackie or anyone else during the assassination. That is why all you have are these crappy photos of the assassination.
@TrueNovice Hi! Thanks for your comments. I find that the cameras not being where they usually were (in front) rather haunting. How ironic wouldn't you say? Seems to me whether Oswald acted alone (which I do not believe) or a conspiracy was at hand (I do believe), if the cameras had been in front, I am sure our millions of questions would have been put to rest right there and then. Thanks for the information. Most interesting period that I grew up in. Cheers. :)
cheers for making it so damn small
poisongirl666cky 1 week ago
What is this? Disinfo? Thanks for zooming out while rotating like its a frigging joke.
anewgift4u 5 months ago
Adm. Burkley had evidence - that is a bombshell - i've never heard of his lawyer's submission. Mr Robert Blakey of HSCA, you absolutely owe us. RIP one hopes the Cold War paradigm - where some second-in-command can use the opponent as his call off excuse (ie LBJ phoning clearances of Russia 22 nov 63) to take the top job. Gen Ike's dear old complex today would patsy up a lone Afghani, firing the wrong way. And stack some evil dudes along an overpass straight ahead. NB Bush cleared Saudis9/11
newsmanbluesman 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you go to thedriverkilledkennedyblogspot com on the web. You will see a blow-up of the Nix film which shows the driver Greer with his arms off the steering wheel something not seen in the altered Zapruder film.
hal2526 9 months ago
if there was a shooter on the knoll, dont you think abraham zapruder would have heard and/or reacted to a shot being fired just a few yards away from him?
MrAgreich 10 months ago
If you accept Oswald acted alone, then everything has to be accepted as a coincidence, since it was not otherwise investigated. The best one I've found was Vice Adm Burkley,MD JFK's personal physician contacting the HSCA through his own lawyer in a registered letter telling them he had evidence of a conspiracy, and there being no follow up about it.
TrueNovice 11 months ago
By the way, the gov't "lost" the original Nix film after it was given to it by the Nix family during the 1978 HSCA investigation. So whatever you think you see on the knoll, can't be analyzed anyway, since it's not clear whether it's human movement or a photographic artifact caused by copying the film.
TrueNovice 11 months ago
whilst i think if you want to see you will, and it's by no means clear there is definate disruption there, though whether they are bodies it is impossible to tell with any certainty. however, more telling is the behaviour of the 2 motorcycle policemen behind the president's car who come to a halt and seemingly both looking in the very same direction as there is the disturbance. they would have heard the shot, and whether they could actually see anything from their position is debatable.
rpd281272 1 year ago
@rpd281272 also the two motocycle officers catch the presidential limosine whilst stopping.this give support to the theroy the limo slowed to an almost halt and that zapruders film was tampered with as it does not appear like this in the zapruder film.
thebrooksy011 8 months ago
This is a film of the assassination of JFK taken from the opposite side of the grassy knoll. In this footage Jackie scrambles out of the limo as she is trying to get her a piece of her husband's skull. She is understandably in total shock. One of the main body guards rush to her only to fall off the limo and just barely got on a second time. The powers that be think there was someone behind the fence that shot JFK. Personally, I don't see anything. I wish they would tell us.
TheJohnlennongirl 1 year ago
We won't truly know all the details until former president George H.W. Bush dies. He's likely one of the last persons from the CIA at that time who is still around and can still be tied to documents from this event.
Zenapproach09 1 year ago
wtf am i looking at?
makethemyth 1 year ago
Too bad digital cameras were'nt available back then.
wtf66611 1 year ago
Appears to show NOTHING of interest to the left of Zapruder who is standing on the concrete block. There is a shape that looks a bit like a guy stood in a firing position on the right side of a convertible in the parking lot - but if that's what it is, he doesn't move after the headshot
funkmasterjee 1 year ago
There is another clip on youtube of the Nix film which shows what can only be interpreted as a 'flash' from the dark area left of Zapruder.
I don't know wht that flash is missing of this clip
funkmasterjee 1 year ago
who were the cops? were they interviewed by the warren commission ? are they still with us?
booferbill 1 year ago
Why do the 2 cops curbside on motorcycles stop after the head shot? One seems to look towards the knoll.
VinnyVoom444 1 year ago
Whoever did this did a very poor job. They tilted it too far! Note the area in the background.
IwshIcldstrtover 2 years ago
I agree
robertmastroianni 1 year ago
@IwshIcldstrtover Again please understand. No one did a bad job here. We are talkiing the early 1960's. Camera's and movie projectors were big bulky items and actually were far ahead of their time back then. I hope this information was helpful to you and others. I was also around back then. That is also why I know this stuff. Your comment though does have merrit. I appreciated your comment. Cheers. :)
TheJohnlennongirl 1 year ago
@TheJohnlennongirl Professional cameras were pretty good in 1963. But the camera car that was usually in front of JFK during all his other motorcades was placed several cars behind his car, where they could not film JFK, Jackie or anyone else during the assassination. That is why all you have are these crappy photos of the assassination.
TrueNovice 11 months ago
@TrueNovice Hi! Thanks for your comments. I find that the cameras not being where they usually were (in front) rather haunting. How ironic wouldn't you say? Seems to me whether Oswald acted alone (which I do not believe) or a conspiracy was at hand (I do believe), if the cameras had been in front, I am sure our millions of questions would have been put to rest right there and then. Thanks for the information. Most interesting period that I grew up in. Cheers. :)
TheJohnlennongirl 11 months ago