Sessions on FOX Business: 'Very Uneasy' after Kagan's Testimony

[resotar]

Sessions is a complete Republican idiot; a mouthpiece for corporations & an unusually biased, poorly reasoned thinker. He says the Dean of the law school at Harvard is a poor choice for the Supreme Court!!

Her crime, according to him: she admits she's a progressive! Oooooh...it's scary to think where we'd be as a country without progressives like...oh, say Thomas Jefferson, Abe Lincoln, John Kennedy or even Geo Washington.

I agree with cutterjunk: Kagan is brilliant & Fox News sucks.

[econogate]

She seems to think we can pass anti-constitutional laws merely cause they will not be enfoced? So why bother passing it in the first place? Seems to me a little disengenuious for her to pretend it will not be enforced at some point by someone in the future....in other words why not on paper say we are a dictatorship cause nobody would ever enforce such a decree, right? Kagan for freedom or against it? She skates around the issues that are important, too eagerly.

[cutterjunk]

Kagan is brilliant. Fox fails to give equal voice to opposite viewpoints.

[sgsfdgfsdfsdfsddf]

@cutterjunk she wants to ban book. declined to answer if government can make you eat something

go Liberals supporting everything Obama does

[leestauf]

@thisnameisuniq So far, she thinks that government has pretty much a dictatorial power or it's citizens. This person has no business as a supreme court justice. She would be better suited as a legal hack in the old U.S.S.R justifying that governments excesses.

[redcarpeg]

Kagan is a Progressive. Are Progressives trustworthy when it comes to originalist interpretation of the US Constitution? NO!

[DcEatsItsYoung]

@redcarpeg

The "originalist interpretation" (article 1, sec 2) considered black people to be 3/5ths of a human being...

Which is why it had to be AMENDED...

One could infer from your statement that the 14th amendment is the type of "progress" that you would be against....but im not gonna accuse you of being pro-segregation.

I do however like how you say "NO!" without giving any evidence....cuz people who make arguments without providing evidence are real "trustworthy"

[OutragedPeople]

Someone needs to ask Kagan about the Supreme Court ruling on the Second Amendment. So would they limit African Americans' ability to defend themselves (read argument of the majority). Conservatives are portrayed as racist but they/we would stand up for our freedoms without regard to race, color, creed, etc.

[vinceman]

in the same way that Sotomayer lied to the Judiciary committee and then voted the opposite way this week?