Russia was no better than we were, but I agree, the US government needs to be stopped. Wonder how many of our rights they'll take away before the people finally snap.
We gave Osama Bin Laden a Stinger missle and a M16 and told him to go kill soviets invading Afgahnistan then years later after all the help we gave him he stabs us in the back by flying planes into the twin towers and killing thousands of innocent lives
@quarterxchange Yes it would be okay, they were defending there land from invasion. After all UK/Europe stole it then the Europeans stole it from us and called it USA, handling stolen goods is a crime too.
@Lewis94UKHD Nothing made it their land. It was largely unpopulated and unused. That's like me claiming a space of land the size of a continent for myself and then killing people who set up their homes there. It'd be murder and they'd be justifed in killing me.
@quarterxchange Yes it did they were there for thousands of years before the white man. I;m not hating the US or white people i'm just saying they don't call them native Americans for nothing. See it if one man lived in a house 100,000,000sqft doesn't give you the right to move in and say you got all this room t'was there's and now stolen is yours shit happens thats history
@Lewis94UKHD Yes it does, he never paid for that land and he never needed that land. If one guy sets up an arbitrary self proclaimed border and has nothing to back it up then it isn' his when millions of other people need land for homes, farms, factories, etc. The territory the U.S. took was largely unoccupied and unused. The Native Americans simply said it was theirs when it turns out that it was able to sustain half a billion people while the Indians selfishly kept it to themselves.
I think you look to much TV or read Wiki. In the ГУЛаг dies 6,3% of all prisoner. And there dies Russian and not whole cultures from other countries. I'll tell you one thing, you don´t have anything against Russia, and start to give stupid answers. If you don´t know something, shut up.
@Humberto4790 Do you something know what the hell are you talking about? You too much play games and watch "good" american movies about drunken russian.
Every nation that becomes powerful will have some kind of symptom of Imperialism it has always been this way or at least to the best of what I know that's the case going all the way back to Rome there's always been some kind of imperialism thing going on
What about Mexico's Aztec culture that was known for enslaving people from tribes all over Mexico? Or after Mexico became independent from Spain, how they killed many other indigenous people to control most of the land? Or, how Imperial Japan's concentration camps during WW2 made Nazi camps look like Disney land? How about the Croat/Serb massacres? Or how about the fact that you don't know shit other than what your political subculture expects you (that only the US does bad)?
@TheLivingHermit1 this video was simply made to show that america doesn't have the best history and because we talk down on communism ask russias past history. basically it's just a response from some dude in russia which he did quite well
@britishareawesome69 You missed my point. It's leftist political dogma, part of that "religion" in other words, to only high light US's bloody past and nothing else. Sure, ignore that all of the apes are violent species, it's only the ones in the US. And what's effective about communism? Look at all of the communist/socialist country failures. People call the US an empire, yet ignore the fact that all of the communist countries have bloody dictators. A gulag is just Lenin's tough love, right?
@TheLivingHermit1 K, but that's not a gulag that came before the gulag and it was a labor camp until 1926 then it became a prison camp, but Lenin died in 1924, but Lenin also started the labor camp in 1924 so it's not clear what he would have done he lived on so I can safely assume that it was Stalin that turned it into a Prison camp that you speak of btw just because I was challenging ur statement doesn't make me a Lenin fanboy
@westeastxybzd True that doesn't make you one. The main root of the gulags was established shortly after Lenin's rise to power with the founding of the Cheka (to "regulate" the people) in 1917. The forced labor camp system under Lenin was a more brutal reform from the older penal systems. People were being executed in mass numbers during these days (Cheka). Sure, the gulags grew exponentially in numbers during the Stalin era. But when you're only two steps behind him, it doesn't look too good.
@TheLivingHermit1 usa is only society to ever get close to exterminating an entire group and it has killed of more people than anyother society still is.>WikiLeaks' Collateral Murder: U.S. Soldier Ethan McCord< this video shows what the media doesnt show on iraq.
@cooks1234 Show me the facts, I wanna see the numbers of those stats you just mention, and also how they came up with them. The video proves nothing, especially when the only context you're considering is the one that they were just doing it to kill some civilians (prove that's the real case). If you really think most soldiers out there are out to full feel their bloodthirsty needs you've been watching too many movies. You want to see real killers, come to Juarez, and we'll show you.
Gee, is your video just a little biased? No. It is created from lies with light seasoning of references to selected historical events. The rest is the imagination of a self-hating, unhappy and deluded person. I hope you find the paradise you imagine would exist without Anglos having ruined it for you.
and another proof that capitalism kills much more people... how can possibly someone deny that communism only wants to free people from that capitalist disease
Disease killed nearly all of the Native Americans, the entire world was involved in the slave trade, the U.S. bombed Japan because the casualty predictions for an invasion were too high, the U.S. aided South Vietnam to defend themselves from the North Vietnamese, the U.S. never funded the Taliban or Al Qauda seeing as they did not exist, etc.
@quarterxchange 1. You are denying the fact that the americans DID kill nearly all of the Natives (99.9%). 2. No the entire world wasn't involved in slavetrade and the US is one of the last countries that has slavetrade. 3. You are correct for the nuke in Japan. 4.The US inavded Vietnam! Vietnam was doing its revolution like the arab countries today, but ofc the US thought they can stop communism and ofc they failed. They were the agressors. 5. The US did funded the talibans in the 1. Gulfwar
1.Prove that Americans killed 99.9% of the native Americans because I know for a fact that disease killed 90%
2. Yes it was and U.S. northern states were some of the first to abolish slavery.
3. South Vietnam was a military ally and U.S. and South Vietnamese soldiers fought alongside each other, what invasion? There was no revolution going on in Vietnam, there were simply combatants coming from the North who attacked south Vietnam.
@quarterxchange 1. haha proof that disease killed the natives and admitt that the US did most of the job
2. this is wrong: Europe abolished it before and in all its colonies so america was 1 of the last countires with slavery. 3. Vietnam was 1 country until the americans allied to some douches in the south to start a war. Saying there was no revolution is just beeing a total lunatic: history prooves you wrong. 4. The taliban did exist before the 90's.
@allal231 I gave you proof disease killed the natives.
The U.S. had slaves for 90 years, Europe had slaves for hundreds. The Northern U.S. banned slaves well before Europe did and I can make no excuses for the South
3. No it wasn't. South Vietnam was effectively esablished well before the U.S. got involved. You have also provided no evidence to show there was some form of pro-commie revolution going on.
4. You didn't look up the Taliban did you? They were established in 1994, look it up.
@quarterxchange Wanting smth to be true doesn't make it the truth. Open your eyes and go inform yourself and if you keep denying the revolution of Vietnam i really hope your parents died in that war.
Look up Guns, Germs, and Steel and there will be an article for the PBS website, simply click on The Story of Germs and it states, "viruses tore through the continent, killing an estimated 90% of Native Americans."
So you can see how I'm curious as to where you got 99.9% as the percentage killed by the U.S. seeing that Indian tribes frequently fought and slaughtered each other as well.
@quarterxchange Do you live on the moon? Because you seem completly brainwashed by US propaganda. The video only shows objective facts without making any conclusion.
No it doesn't, you pulled numbers from your ass. I already gave you a source stating that 90% of the Indians died from disease while the video says that the U.S. killed "tens of millions" of Indians. We wouldn't have enough bullets to commit a holocaust of that scale.
The Taliban simply DID NOT EXIST during the Soviet-Afghan war, so that is an abject lie.
South Vietnam was an ally of ours before and already working with U.S. advisors before the U.S. troop surge, so I ask, what invasion?
@quarterxchange i agree fot the 99%, but don't deny that you did killed indians (most of them) because of their origins , the taliban did existed before the 90's (you should look it up) and if the US was an ally why did they invaded the country? Or didn't they send troops to Vietnam? Vietnam was finally getting unified and rid of nationalism and capitalism. I mean are you a jerk? And how comes we are not talking about slavery anymore? Do you finally agree you are wrong?
@allal231 No we didn't. We began moving into open and seemingly unoccupied territory when settlers began being attacked by Indian raiders. That's when the U.S. calvalry began fighting them.
I did look it up. Most sources say that the Taliban was founded in 1994. Did you just assume this?
They didn't invade. We didn't have to fight South Vietnam to land in South Vietnamese territory. South Vietnam did not want to get rid of capitalism and become part of the North, they didn't have to.
Wow... I just read this whole thing over and I have to say that quaterxchange is doing a pretty good job of completely refuting your arguments. So far everything that you communists have said has been proven false. Give up and stop getting so mad because the U.S. is a super power and world police of the world. The fact that you know and speak English just goes to show that the U.S. is superior. Oh by the way... You mad Bro?
@Xsting0 actually he doens't proofs anythiong he just SAYS its wrong
Since 1945 the US is invading countries and setting up dictatorships to exploit their populations. You don't belive me? Watch the video! You don't belive the video? You deny facts! The funny thing is that since 1945 the US hasn't won 1 single war or created any democracy.
Im pretty sure that most of the Native Americans died from diseases, and we didnt start the Korean War, the North Koreans did, and we jumped in to help our South Korean Allies. Also, before i run out of comment space, You seem to love the USSR so much, that you fail to acknowledge the fact that they have a very bloody history as well. Remember the Russian Revolution of 1917? How about Stalin's oppressive rule in which he murdered 20,000,000 Russians? Or the Soviet Invasion of Afgahnistan?
@moviegoinggamer Ofc the koreans started the war, eventhough they didn't declare war on you. Or did they invade your country? No sir, you did. Think before you talk please it is so annoying: Korea was 1 country until they started a revolution tu unify the country.. The bloody history of USSR? Yes there is, as they had to get rid of the white army invadors 1921 (again americans and europeans). Without Stalin all of Europe would be NAZI. The war of afghanistan was meant to stop islamist trrorism.
@allal231 We didn't invade South Korea. We already had firm ties with them after Japan lost control of Korea. They were never one country after WW2, there was no revolution in Korea either, there was simply an invasion that the U.S. effectively smashed.
If the Soviets cared about stopping Islamist terrorism they would have fought against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan when they launched an attack against Israel well after Israel was established.
@allal231 We had a pact with South Korea, we were obligated to defend them from communist pigs like you. Yes Korea was one country but it became two AFTER WWII during which Americans took the Southern half of the Peninsula and the USSR took the Northern Half, then the North Koreans tried to take over the rest of the peninsula and tried to spread that idealistic communist shit. And if it werent for Stalin, than all of the Russia and the Republics wouldn't have had to go through the "Great Terror"
Guys guys take it easy. what goes around comes around. Time will come when it is their turn to burn in hell. if my country did such thing i would fucking demonstrate and show my people what kind of shitt heads we have. but US is proud of its murderes army. So I hope US citizent go throw this shit!
you call US for humans? gimme a fucking break!! Humans care about other people! US citizent DONT GIVE A FUCK u know why? because of the wars they get benefits. cheap oil, cheap food etc!!
@Darre08 r u retarded? because of our wars we have lost a lot. because of iraq and afghanistan we r deeply in debt and r economy has been badly weaken and u people claim that we did 9/11 ourselfs.
ARE YOU RETARDED? because of the wars and controlling other countries resources US gets much benefits. nr 1 superpower in the world and can give billions of dollar to puppet countries and their masters Israel. you think US gives a shit about you? you are just a goyim and slave for others. NOW STFU and go work for your master you good animal thing!! US needed 9/11 to make illegal wars and fool their slaves so they cannot revolt in the US against the wars. like you for exampe
@Darre08 no dude have u ver even been to the uS or even fucking live in the US like i do? since these wars of started our economy is going down hill and the value of the dollar has decreased immensely ! our country is on the brink of collapse because of these wars and u claim we did it for our benefit. our govt is 14 trillion in debt because of these wars dude why the fuck would we want to do that to ourselfs? u r nothing more than a dude with radical claims
what a freaking retarted are you a handicaped? you live in the us and can't understand english, what a brainwashed shit head. I said you are a slave ok? that means you are expendable to the us goverment. you have the most richest people in the world. 1% of us citizent owes like 90 % of the whole country. and you have the manner to call me radical. hahahaha you see how you make fool about your self. 1% owes like 90% now, stfu and go to work and pay to your master israel.
please don' tell me you are not expendable, go ask your gov. they will say hell yea, we can sacrifice the whole us for israel, one example. read your idiot history, it will open your eyes. US attacked iraq because israel wanted so, you give away billions of dollar every year to israel. they are not even loans, but tax payers money. like i said you are expendable, deal with it, stop crying. what goes around comes around, It is karma for the millions of deaths us caused. bye
@Darre08 The U.S. govt is not run by Israel nor do we make a contribution to Israel that compares to the notion that we'd be ready to sink our own country for the sake of Israel. We give them billions in aid yes, we don't give our blood. Many nations in the past fund allies by giving them free money, it doesn't mean that they were slaves to the nation they were aiding.
@Darre08 WOW! Are these the works of genius you come up with when you put forth your opinions?!?! MY mind is blown!
You can't call me a retarded idiot when you don't offer reasons whym you idiot. You're an idiot because you didn't defend your inspid remarks and your mother and father were siblings
My mother and father were siblings? haha you attacking me with culture stuff? AHAHAH hey asshole my culture and traditions has survived for 5000 years and my genes are strong and dominant. Its the UK, american who fuck their sisters. Not us. please you have just came out from caves. learn your history u alcoholic piece of shit!
@Darre08 I'm glad you're a communist anti-american, your actions and what you say would be detrimental to the side I argue for. You are all rhetoric, insults, and nonsense. You don't have any concrete arguments for the side you argue for, in fact nobody on your side does, you just make it blatantly obvious.
i dont believe in communism you twat, stupid americunt, who accuse people with such things. you fucking animal with 200 years of history, go and evolve or something! I am a patriotic peace loving human being, I believe in freedom of mankind and independence! I want to see some justice, and that is the fuckers country burn in hell for what they are doing to mine! what goes around comes around. I would be ashamed if my country goes into war with other countries and intefering etc
you started the insults little slave worker for israel!!! I already have proven everything i said! you work for israel (proven, truth)= billions of taxpayers goes to israel and israel interest is nr 1 in the US. u have a savage history about 200 years. (proven, read history books) about, slaves, genocide, racism etc. US, has allways been in wars since 1775 it is proven and recorded just check it in your libary. and alot of war crimes against the humanity with nukes and chemial.
No we don't. Simply giving aid to a nation does not mean we work for them. We give them 20 or so billion dollars, that's lunch money compared to the U.S..
1. Nearly all countries in the world had slaves when the U.S. had slaves
2. Racism was very rampant throughout the world when racism was rampant in the U.S.
3. There are no genocides committed by the U.S., we have never attempted to exterminate a group of people.
I see you are one fuck uneducated animal!!! how will you possible could know anything? omg how dumb i have been, I have talked to one uneducated slave who works for israel! a fucking GOYYIM!!
@Darre08 I'm not good at all with matters technical so I have difficulty sorting out all of the symbols from the words, could you simply tell me which keywords to search in google so I can pull up and read over what evidence you want me to look over.
Meanwhile you can look up Guns, Germs, and Steel on Google where it will be on the pbs website and click The Story of Germs, scroll down and it states, "the viruses tore through the continent, killing an estimated 90% of Native Americans."
@Darre08 Keep in mind that there were many Indian tribes on the continent and they were frequently at war with each other themselves and taking land from one another.
And you believe in what ? red utopia ? central planned economy ? It didn't work out, and thanks to de US that it help to stop it before spreading on the whole world like some kind of a flue but much more bloody.
Read a history book. Ever since the White Man emerged from his icy cave, he has brought death to all. European history is full of barbaric examples of wanton cruelty and needless slaughter.
When the White Man achieved the power to expand itself across the sea, it just did what was natural....
you are right im not lying but im just sayin there are also good whites. there are not many but there are and they are muslims. the muslims are the only people where race or skin color doesent matter. the europeans and america are the ones to be blamed and the russians too.
not all whites my friend but you are right most of them are. there are also white muslims they are not like that at all. not every muslim is brown or black but hey im talking like you were a muslim even though i dont know...
all true but were are we (USA) now and were are you now?, The world is round not flat like this TV (computer) screen that you sit behind, there is good and bad in all people and there land! It's just what side your on and were you go from this! BUT If in your times you happen to come by a (freak you tube name) FillHipLips say to him he had his time now it OURS! USA all the way
@kilox10001 Engineers, pilots, mechanics say its impossible for some amateur pilot a plane into the pentagon that easily, 1 plane bringing down a whole WTC building, glass and some stones bringing down WTC7, etc. And nice comparison you got there, Conspiracy theorists with holocaust deniers.. Hmm, I like it when you call me a CT, means I'm right, thanks.
@r4f4st4n1 Why aren't engineers, pilots, mechanics and architects rallying against the U.S. govt for staging 9/11 if most of them agree that planes couldn't take down the towers. I personally know military, and commercial pilots and engineers since my father was an air force pilot and then flew for a commercial liner, they think people like you are insane.
The fact of the matter is that nearly every single peer review study done on the 9/11 collapse disagrees with you.
@kilox10001 I still showed you tons of links you didn't counter: Engineers say there were explosives, you say there weren't, I guess out argument ends here .
@kilox10001 Arguing with 9/11 conspiracy theorists is like arguing with holocaust deniers. While the fact of the matter is is that the vast majority of engineers, pilots, mechanics, and architects concur that 9/11 was in fact a terrorist attack in which Airplanes were used to bring down the towers, pseudo-intellectuals who never put together a car engine, built a house, or flew an airplaine, will give you their expert opinion on what is regarded by actual experts as a major architectual failure.
@quarterxchange What is your opinion? It's alright to be a conspiracist, but extremists take it to far. Do you think it was an inside job? Was the The Plane filled with TNT or some sort of bomb?
@kilox10001 I sent you the vid and you didn't watch it, too bad, what else could reach 1600Cº in the crash site? Yeah, Thermite. Plus what racism? Mind explaining that to me? Oh and since you're at it, you didn't explain to me why there was MOLTEN STEEL on the crash site. Plus, how come the debris fall at freefall speed? WTC 7 collapsed due to.. Ok you gotta be shitting me, how come the debris(Glasses, few plastics) would FLY away from the twin towers and HIT the WTC MAKING IT COLLAPSE. Fail.
@kilox10001 I don't even need to mention the WTC 7 cos the argument would instantly be over and It's fun to make fun of some dumb american kids. About the engineers: watch?v=ssuAMNas1us&feature=related. Plus, how do you explain the building debris falling at FREEFALL Speed? Guess you can't explain that one aswell.. Ah well, how about the termonite explosives? Or how else are you going to explain the MOLTEN STEEL that can only melt at 1600Cº+ and the max temp. jetfuel can achieve is 1200ºC? Hmmm.
@kilox10001 Every exprienced engineer SAYS the buildings were built to witstand a terrorist attack of this kind, it has been said 30-40 years ago when they were built. You should watch more news. Plus it's impossible for a plane to bring down a whole structure like that. how about the BOMB explosions people HEARD before the planes hit the towers? Hmm, try explaining that.
@r4f4st4n1 are you stupid? you found a video on youtube... i dont get "valid facts" off any youtube video there IS nothing to counter. come back with real facts and maybe il talk you have your head so far up your butt you just cant stand the fact im winning this argument and just HAS to find something to fight back with. out of options kid stop wasting my time
@MrMeineNamen Then why would I believe a KID that DOESNT EVEN SHOWED ME a YT vid and CANT COUNTER MY FACTS? Lol.. You're automatically winning by just assuming something with no proof and no facts? Nice.
@kilox10001 Americans are the ones that stereotype, especially the "Turban wearing bad guy" You're the ones that call terrorists everyone thats a muslim because of the american made 9/11. I showed you a vid with FACTS that show the 9/11 was done by your own government, IF you wanted to prove me wrong you could easily counter ANY of the facts they say, if you don't, it means you just CAN'T counter them, Plus, it's not ONE video, its THOUSANDS.
@kilox10001 Mhm, you didn't even watch the video, that's not even a home made video, it's a documentary with valid facts that you can't still counter.
Wnxsilence, please show me where you got the fact that it was singlehandedly the U.S. cavalry that murdered "tens of millions" of native Americans over the course of 100 years rather than the vicious diseases such as smallpox and measeles that were already brought before by European conquistadors and settlers.
@kilox10001 Funny thing you can't counter the VALID FACTS the vid shows.. Typical american "MY COUNTRIES THE BEST!!" "but you havent visitted france, india, japan, finland, russia, etc etc" "WHO THE FUCK ARE U TO TELL ME WHAT TO THINK OMG" "too right im not your Go.. I mean, government that tells you what to think, what to do, when to do, whenever he wants."
Try to counter the FACTS the vid shows, else you're wrong and I win .
@r4f4st4n1 Have you ever lived in the U.S? And if so, assuming the people you disagree with are conservative Americans and knowing the fact that it's the government that funds liberal news shows and organizations who preach what you preach, how can you say that we are simply believing what our government tells us to believe when in fact shows and organizations funded by our government are more in line with your views.
@quarterxchange I did live in the US, very good life, and awesome. Thing is, I like the US as a country, yet i hate the government and the fact that they invade other countries for profit. Taking out the shit they did to other countries and to themselves, I'd say I'd love the US but that's impossible, it's thanks to them the world is as it is.
@r4f4st4n1 We don't invade other countries for profit, that's the most ridiculous thing I've heard. Wars are very expensive and when we spend billions of dollar fighting armies in 3rd world nations we don't get any profit in return.
@r4f4st4n1 Yes oil is a strategic resource for the west and is a vital asset that keeps our side of the world functioning and the middle east stable and progressive. We are keeping the supply to the west stable, not getting free oil or money. And I'm interested in knowing where the U.S. used weapons and tactics on innocent civilians on purpose.
@quarterxchange Hmm.. So you invasion that evolves killing Iraq civilians keeps the middle east stable.. Cool.. Oh, US keeps killing civvies every day, want me to show you one of the million vids out there?
watch?v=is9sxRfU-ik
As you can see even from the comments, people are getting SICK of the US terrorist attacks.
@r4f4st4n1 Most sources claim that there are roughly 100,000-150,000 dead civilians, a good number of which are caused by people blowing them selves up in markets, mosques, schools, buses, and in the middle of crowded streets.
@r4f4st4n1 Yes in wars civilians die. But before it wasn't much better and I believe most would be willing to die for freedom. Before Hussein gassed his own people and started a few large wars claiming millions of lives and was a threat to all of the Middle East. Iraq also had strict and oppressive laws that are always in place when a dictator is in power. Do you know how many german civilians were killed before WW2, zero. Therefore the Soviets were the terrorists right?
@quarterxchange Err.. Americans kill innocent civilians on purpose, examples? Japan (WWII), Iraq, Vietnam, Afghan, Cuba, etc. Before WWII Germany and the Soviet Union had a peace treaty, AFTER Germans INVADED, RAPED and HUMILIATED innocent Soviet civilians then yes, the soviets completely killed Germany, if it wasn't for them, the whole Europe would be hailing a German dictator right now. I thank God for Hitler's stupidity to attack the Soviets.
@r4f4st4n1 Yes and Japan slaughtered perhaps twice as many people as the Nazi's did. The bombings of Japan are not condemned by any other Asian power. China lost 17 million civilians to the Japanese so the U.S. bombing Japan was justified by your logic. We never bombed cuban civilians and the bombings of Vietnam were to eliminate the supply line of the NVA and to bomb out VC positions, not to kill civilians. And we've always used precision bombs in urban Iraqi areas to prevent Civilian deaths.
@quarterxchange You bombed TWO cities FULL OF CIVILIANS, what makes you any different from the japanese dictator that invaded other Asian countries? Nothing. PLUS the japanese weren't attacking anyone when you bombed them, the Emperor had unofficially surrendered, since there were NO BATTLES for more than SIX MONTHS, but no the americans wanted to test their new toy and also wanted supremacy over japan by making them officially surrender.
@r4f4st4n1 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Naval ports and munition depots the Imperial armed forces. We killed tens of thousands of combatants at a higher ration to civilian dead than the russians killed when they carpet bombed Finland and Germany. Japan was actively preparing for an invasion and declared that as many as 28 million civilians would fight any allied invasion. We didn't want to slaughter tens of millions of women and children in a gunfight so we bombed two cities killing a fraction.
@quarterxchange EXACTLY, FINALLY SOME ONE UNDERSTANDS. A land invasion of Japan would cause more deaths than the atomic bombs. And Nagasaki, the area in which the bomb detonated was mostly filled up of farms and open lands. And luckily, that was the secondary target. And about the 9/11 conspiracy. I know for a fact that it's not a set up or an inside job. But I can believe that Their was a bomb on there. But I most of the time don't even believe that.
@quPlus, they ATTACKED AN AMBULANCE WITH CHILDREN INSIDE IT, was that a mistake aswell? watch?v=KF2miwIWOE4 Was this a fucking mistake aswell? See why people are starting to hate the US when the time passes by? Information, deadly yo dictators/Invaders/Oppressors, etc etc. Exactly what american government is and WILL BE. Dont take me wrong, I like the US as a country, I loved to spend the some holidays, great country, but what would be a normal person reaction to what they in Iraq? Get me?
@r4f4st4n1 That was not an ambulance. Ambulances have redcross markings specifically required by international law, the same law that bans enemies from firing on men or vehicals that wear the red cross.
Wow, that video stated 66,000 dead civilians, that's the lowest estimate I've heard.
Yes, they are accidents. It's a terrible strategy to attack civilians when trying to get the civilians to back you and the U.S. knows it. We don't gain anything by spending billions to kill children.
@quarterxchange Ambulances when-ether with red cross markings or not do try to get the wounded, that van WITH CHILDREN INSIDE IT was trying to get the wounded UNARMED civilians, You have no excuse here.
66000 dead civvies on purpose as we can all see. After all, they're there for the oil.
@r4f4st4n1 Again oil is a vital interest to the world and keeping the oil lines stable keeps countries all over the world stable and their people alive including the Middle East.
They thought those personel were carrying weapons and firing on them to prevent them from escaping is legitimate when you are firing on combatants. Sadly they made a mistake.
@quarter Wtf are you blaming on the soviets that don't exist anymore, you really are an american patriot "ALL RUSSIANS MUST DIE" Kid, Cold War is over, Russian military supremacy over US has been proven, but there's not going to be a war okay? Stop fearing the russians they wont kill you.. *Cough* Sadly *cough*. K so since the US army can't distinguish cameras from wea.. Oh wait, it's the US army, They're forgiven. Plus, how about the 100s of vids Wikileaks shows us? Are they accidents aswell?
@r4f4st4n1 You're a moron, you brought up Vietnam, Korea, WW2, Cuba, etc, which were conflicts the Soviets had direct involvement in and conflicts in which communist forces actively took up arms to fight. I don't fear the Russians, seeing as we've outmatched them for the past 60 or so years I don't consider them a threat, I'm just stating the fact that in the conflicts you listed communist forces killed just as much if not more civilians than the United States.
@quarterxchange Theres no more communist forces, and as I said, the Russian army is far better than the US one at the moment. Plus americans always killed innocent civvies for actually no purpose. And 250 000 civilians are part of the naval ports? Couldn't you just target the munition depots? Plus, you didn't had a fight with the Japs for 6+months, what was the point? There was basically a unofficial cease fire. I know you wanted to provoke the soviets, but failed.
@r4f4st4n1 Currently Russian miltiary officers disagree with you. They know that currently the U.S. posses the most powerful military.
The battle of Okinawa lasted nearly 2 months from April to June 1945. There was no "unofficial ceasefire".
We destroyed nearly every military target in Japan and they were still fighting. The only way to send the message was to show them the destructive power we had at our disposal.
@quarterxchange I said and I'll keep saying MONTHS, the americans were too busy trying to be better than the soviets in Europe, but as usual they failed. You could've use another choice other than bombing civilian cities, but if that seems right to you, it's ok, I understand most americans retardation problems, after all, even today you bomb and kill civilians, I don't know why am I even bothering with this.
If russians are inferior, how come they have better equipment?
@r4f4st4n1 I just listed a naval battle that took place a couple weeks before the bombings. We weren't trying to be better than the soviets, we just left them alone.
Please list other choices so I can shoot them down.
They don't have better equipment and any level headed Russian officer would agree. They are just developing 5th generation fighters, they have no supercarriers, they don't have stealth ships and they havn't mass produced a new helicopter in years.
@quarterxchange There were Soviet spies in the US and vice versa at that time, there was always an opposition between the two countries. You shot nothing down, the US had a new toy that they had to test to show off their power and inspire fear to specially the Soviet union, thanks to that they bombed two cities full of civilians. Want me to repeat? Bomb. Two. Cities. Full. Of. Civilians. With. An. Atomic. Bomb.
@r4f4st4n1 Yes there were but we weren't trying to be "better" than them in the wars ends.
You havn't listed any other choices but I guarantee you I will.
For the second time please list other options the U.S. could have taken to force a surrender out of Japan. Come on list them so I can thrash you on them. You won't be too hard to make a fool of.
@r4f4st4n1 What military bases? We bombed them to the point where their navy, and air force were obsolete. We launched massive bombing campaigns on factories and military targets. Again their navy and air force were wiped out and we were carpet bombing their military targets months before the atomic bombs.
@quarterxchange So and you needed to deal the final strike on the innocent civvies.. Hmm, I see you changed these past years, now when you invade a country you bomb the civvies during the war and not just in the end of the war. I don't think that's improvement.
Your army still uses the M16A4 which is not 40 years old. Plus, aren't you, Americans, that keep comparing your 40 year old rifle to Russians 70 year old rifle? Hmm.. Even the newer ARs such as the scar, doesnt compare to the AN in terms of accuracy, reliability and in this case, rate of fire, it can surpass the AN in stopping power due to it's 7.62mm round but its as obvious as 1+1=2 I guess? Those military bases were minor, even if they were a threat, theres something called: precision bombing
@r4f4st4n1 I didn't compare the M-16 to the Ak-47. I can show you videos of newer weapons being submerged in the sand and water and still firing. I also looked up the rate of fire on the world.guns.ru and found that the An-94 has a rate of fire from 600-1800 while the modern M16s have a rate of fire of 700-950. So the An-94 can empty it's clip a second faster than the M16 in fact full auto has been becoming so obsolete that soldiers in Iraq don't use it.
@quarterxchange The AN94 has a worse RoF than the M16s, plus, high RoFs are an advantage if you know how to use full automatic (Apparently americans dont as they empty their clips, that why the M16 has a 3 round burst on it LOL). And the civilians that were suffering due to the war wanted to die for their country? Hmm, america propaganda at its finest.
America FUCK YEA!
hackerisslv 2 months ago
pidarasi politiki!!!!!!!!!!!! a normaljnije lüdi stradaüt!!!!!!!!
MrXxxjoker 2 months ago
Russia was no better than we were, but I agree, the US government needs to be stopped. Wonder how many of our rights they'll take away before the people finally snap.
Ariana321 2 months ago
Y después los gringos de preguntan por qué en todo el mundo los odian.
Muy buen vídeo!
largogrunge2 3 months ago
america did not fund israel in 1948 dumbass
metro2033fan 3 months ago
We gave Osama Bin Laden a Stinger missle and a M16 and told him to go kill soviets invading Afgahnistan then years later after all the help we gave him he stabs us in the back by flying planes into the twin towers and killing thousands of innocent lives
Evzone1821 3 months ago
Comment removed
laetitiak1978 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@laetitiak1978 HAHAHA your a brainwashed western bitch. Shouldn't you be in the kitchen making his lunch not on youtube? Like a good American loser?
RedMusicSinging 3 months ago
Comment removed
laetitiak1978 3 months ago
wtf is this video flag
werlops 5 months ago
@mk3238 The context: western governments practiced imperialism to gain economic control over the world.
That better?
darklordsma 5 months ago
when we gave saddam arms iran is enemy the enemy of my enemy is my friend
TheROADRUNNER36 7 months ago
The Russians killed more innocent people in the 74 years of the ussr than the US did since 1776
USMCLieutenant 7 months ago
@USMCLieutenant But you stole a country
Lewis94UKHD 6 months ago
@Lewis94UKHD Bullshit.
Tell me how many American Indians you think were living in the Western and Central U.S. before Manifest Destyiny.
Would it be okay if I go out to Antartica, claim Antartica for myself, and then began to kill people who tried to live there?
quarterxchange 6 months ago
@quarterxchange Yes it would be okay, they were defending there land from invasion. After all UK/Europe stole it then the Europeans stole it from us and called it USA, handling stolen goods is a crime too.
Lewis94UKHD 6 months ago
@Lewis94UKHD Nothing made it their land. It was largely unpopulated and unused. That's like me claiming a space of land the size of a continent for myself and then killing people who set up their homes there. It'd be murder and they'd be justifed in killing me.
quarterxchange 6 months ago
@quarterxchange Yes it did they were there for thousands of years before the white man. I;m not hating the US or white people i'm just saying they don't call them native Americans for nothing. See it if one man lived in a house 100,000,000sqft doesn't give you the right to move in and say you got all this room t'was there's and now stolen is yours shit happens thats history
Lewis94UKHD 6 months ago
@Lewis94UKHD Yes it does, he never paid for that land and he never needed that land. If one guy sets up an arbitrary self proclaimed border and has nothing to back it up then it isn' his when millions of other people need land for homes, farms, factories, etc. The territory the U.S. took was largely unoccupied and unused. The Native Americans simply said it was theirs when it turns out that it was able to sustain half a billion people while the Indians selfishly kept it to themselves.
quarterxchange 6 months ago 2
@USMCLieutenant And this magically makes imperialism and slaughter ok?! ... ಠ_ಠ
"The russians did it too, lol"
You do realise it's consistent to hate both communism and imperialism?
darklordsma 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@darklordsma "You do realise it's consistent to hate both communism and imperialism?"
Like hell, the stated purpose of the Soviet Union was to spread communism by force if need be.
quarterxchange 5 months ago
@Humberto4790
I think you look to much TV or read Wiki. In the ГУЛаг dies 6,3% of all prisoner. And there dies Russian and not whole cultures from other countries. I'll tell you one thing, you don´t have anything against Russia, and start to give stupid answers. If you don´t know something, shut up.
1Russoldier1 7 months ago in playlist Мой видеоблог
@1Russoldier1 Hey look your buddy is selling weapons to the fighters in Chechnya that are trying to kill you and him.
Humberto4790 7 months ago
@Humberto4790 Do you something know what the hell are you talking about? You too much play games and watch "good" american movies about drunken russian.
1Russoldier1 7 months ago
@1Russoldier1 I dont think there is even a movie about that.
Humberto4790 7 months ago
Every nation that becomes powerful will have some kind of symptom of Imperialism it has always been this way or at least to the best of what I know that's the case going all the way back to Rome there's always been some kind of imperialism thing going on
westeastxybzd 8 months ago
Stupid childish one sided video. As if the US was the only aggressor
robi2000 8 months ago
What about Mexico's Aztec culture that was known for enslaving people from tribes all over Mexico? Or after Mexico became independent from Spain, how they killed many other indigenous people to control most of the land? Or, how Imperial Japan's concentration camps during WW2 made Nazi camps look like Disney land? How about the Croat/Serb massacres? Or how about the fact that you don't know shit other than what your political subculture expects you (that only the US does bad)?
TheLivingHermit1 8 months ago 2
@TheLivingHermit1 this video was simply made to show that america doesn't have the best history and because we talk down on communism ask russias past history. basically it's just a response from some dude in russia which he did quite well
britishareawesome69 8 months ago
@britishareawesome69 You missed my point. It's leftist political dogma, part of that "religion" in other words, to only high light US's bloody past and nothing else. Sure, ignore that all of the apes are violent species, it's only the ones in the US. And what's effective about communism? Look at all of the communist/socialist country failures. People call the US an empire, yet ignore the fact that all of the communist countries have bloody dictators. A gulag is just Lenin's tough love, right?
TheLivingHermit1 8 months ago
@TheLivingHermit1 Gulag's only existed during the reign of Stalin just to let you know
westeastxybzd 8 months ago
@westeastxybzd You're wrong. Look up the Solovki prison Camp. Lenin was not the little angel you want to believe he was.
TheLivingHermit1 8 months ago
@TheLivingHermit1 K, but that's not a gulag that came before the gulag and it was a labor camp until 1926 then it became a prison camp, but Lenin died in 1924, but Lenin also started the labor camp in 1924 so it's not clear what he would have done he lived on so I can safely assume that it was Stalin that turned it into a Prison camp that you speak of btw just because I was challenging ur statement doesn't make me a Lenin fanboy
westeastxybzd 8 months ago
@westeastxybzd True that doesn't make you one. The main root of the gulags was established shortly after Lenin's rise to power with the founding of the Cheka (to "regulate" the people) in 1917. The forced labor camp system under Lenin was a more brutal reform from the older penal systems. People were being executed in mass numbers during these days (Cheka). Sure, the gulags grew exponentially in numbers during the Stalin era. But when you're only two steps behind him, it doesn't look too good.
TheLivingHermit1 8 months ago
@TheLivingHermit1 usa is only society to ever get close to exterminating an entire group and it has killed of more people than anyother society still is.>WikiLeaks' Collateral Murder: U.S. Soldier Ethan McCord< this video shows what the media doesnt show on iraq.
cooks1234 7 months ago
@cooks1234 Show me the facts, I wanna see the numbers of those stats you just mention, and also how they came up with them. The video proves nothing, especially when the only context you're considering is the one that they were just doing it to kill some civilians (prove that's the real case). If you really think most soldiers out there are out to full feel their bloodthirsty needs you've been watching too many movies. You want to see real killers, come to Juarez, and we'll show you.
TheLivingHermit1 7 months ago
como se llama la segunda cacion porfavor diganme gracias
azulcrema1200 9 months ago
America Created the Nuclear Bomb, Russia put it in every one's hands.
tiger12220 9 months ago
America till the end!
tiger12220 9 months ago
Gee, is your video just a little biased? No. It is created from lies with light seasoning of references to selected historical events. The rest is the imagination of a self-hating, unhappy and deluded person. I hope you find the paradise you imagine would exist without Anglos having ruined it for you.
Maybe the whole thing is your imagination?
constructivereconcil 9 months ago
truth is both americans/west and russians ect are all fucking morons.. THE END
britishareawesome69 9 months ago
@britishareawesome69 ya i agree
raymund1699 9 months ago
and another proof that capitalism kills much more people... how can possibly someone deny that communism only wants to free people from that capitalist disease
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 What's another proof capitalims kills much more people?
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange Im sending you a personal message,of a guy,who did go to N.Korea.But I still know u gonna deny his words.
ipwnagee 10 months ago
@quarterxchange Are you sure you watched the video? History prooves that capitalism kills more people then communism
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 No it doesn't.
Disease killed nearly all of the Native Americans, the entire world was involved in the slave trade, the U.S. bombed Japan because the casualty predictions for an invasion were too high, the U.S. aided South Vietnam to defend themselves from the North Vietnamese, the U.S. never funded the Taliban or Al Qauda seeing as they did not exist, etc.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange 1. You are denying the fact that the americans DID kill nearly all of the Natives (99.9%). 2. No the entire world wasn't involved in slavetrade and the US is one of the last countries that has slavetrade. 3. You are correct for the nuke in Japan. 4.The US inavded Vietnam! Vietnam was doing its revolution like the arab countries today, but ofc the US thought they can stop communism and ofc they failed. They were the agressors. 5. The US did funded the talibans in the 1. Gulfwar
allal231 10 months ago
1.Prove that Americans killed 99.9% of the native Americans because I know for a fact that disease killed 90%
2. Yes it was and U.S. northern states were some of the first to abolish slavery.
3. South Vietnam was a military ally and U.S. and South Vietnamese soldiers fought alongside each other, what invasion? There was no revolution going on in Vietnam, there were simply combatants coming from the North who attacked south Vietnam.
The Taliban did not exist until the 1990's
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange 1. haha proof that disease killed the natives and admitt that the US did most of the job
2. this is wrong: Europe abolished it before and in all its colonies so america was 1 of the last countires with slavery. 3. Vietnam was 1 country until the americans allied to some douches in the south to start a war. Saying there was no revolution is just beeing a total lunatic: history prooves you wrong. 4. The taliban did exist before the 90's.
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 I gave you proof disease killed the natives.
The U.S. had slaves for 90 years, Europe had slaves for hundreds. The Northern U.S. banned slaves well before Europe did and I can make no excuses for the South
3. No it wasn't. South Vietnam was effectively esablished well before the U.S. got involved. You have also provided no evidence to show there was some form of pro-commie revolution going on.
4. You didn't look up the Taliban did you? They were established in 1994, look it up.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange Wanting smth to be true doesn't make it the truth. Open your eyes and go inform yourself and if you keep denying the revolution of Vietnam i really hope your parents died in that war.
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 We killed 20 Communist combatants for every dead U.S. combatant.
There was no revolution in Vietnam, there were no uprisings, no protests, etc.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
Look up Guns, Germs, and Steel and there will be an article for the PBS website, simply click on The Story of Germs and it states, "viruses tore through the continent, killing an estimated 90% of Native Americans."
So you can see how I'm curious as to where you got 99.9% as the percentage killed by the U.S. seeing that Indian tribes frequently fought and slaughtered each other as well.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange Do you live on the moon? Because you seem completly brainwashed by US propaganda. The video only shows objective facts without making any conclusion.
allal231 10 months ago
No it doesn't, you pulled numbers from your ass. I already gave you a source stating that 90% of the Indians died from disease while the video says that the U.S. killed "tens of millions" of Indians. We wouldn't have enough bullets to commit a holocaust of that scale.
The Taliban simply DID NOT EXIST during the Soviet-Afghan war, so that is an abject lie.
South Vietnam was an ally of ours before and already working with U.S. advisors before the U.S. troop surge, so I ask, what invasion?
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange i agree fot the 99%, but don't deny that you did killed indians (most of them) because of their origins , the taliban did existed before the 90's (you should look it up) and if the US was an ally why did they invaded the country? Or didn't they send troops to Vietnam? Vietnam was finally getting unified and rid of nationalism and capitalism. I mean are you a jerk? And how comes we are not talking about slavery anymore? Do you finally agree you are wrong?
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 No we didn't. We began moving into open and seemingly unoccupied territory when settlers began being attacked by Indian raiders. That's when the U.S. calvalry began fighting them.
I did look it up. Most sources say that the Taliban was founded in 1994. Did you just assume this?
They didn't invade. We didn't have to fight South Vietnam to land in South Vietnamese territory. South Vietnam did not want to get rid of capitalism and become part of the North, they didn't have to.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
Wow... I just read this whole thing over and I have to say that quaterxchange is doing a pretty good job of completely refuting your arguments. So far everything that you communists have said has been proven false. Give up and stop getting so mad because the U.S. is a super power and world police of the world. The fact that you know and speak English just goes to show that the U.S. is superior. Oh by the way... You mad Bro?
Xsting0 10 months ago
@Xsting0 actually he doens't proofs anythiong he just SAYS its wrong
Since 1945 the US is invading countries and setting up dictatorships to exploit their populations. You don't belive me? Watch the video! You don't belive the video? You deny facts! The funny thing is that since 1945 the US hasn't won 1 single war or created any democracy.
allal231 10 months ago
Im pretty sure that most of the Native Americans died from diseases, and we didnt start the Korean War, the North Koreans did, and we jumped in to help our South Korean Allies. Also, before i run out of comment space, You seem to love the USSR so much, that you fail to acknowledge the fact that they have a very bloody history as well. Remember the Russian Revolution of 1917? How about Stalin's oppressive rule in which he murdered 20,000,000 Russians? Or the Soviet Invasion of Afgahnistan?
moviegoinggamer 10 months ago
@moviegoinggamer Ofc the koreans started the war, eventhough they didn't declare war on you. Or did they invade your country? No sir, you did. Think before you talk please it is so annoying: Korea was 1 country until they started a revolution tu unify the country.. The bloody history of USSR? Yes there is, as they had to get rid of the white army invadors 1921 (again americans and europeans). Without Stalin all of Europe would be NAZI. The war of afghanistan was meant to stop islamist trrorism.
allal231 10 months ago
@allal231 We didn't invade South Korea. We already had firm ties with them after Japan lost control of Korea. They were never one country after WW2, there was no revolution in Korea either, there was simply an invasion that the U.S. effectively smashed.
If the Soviets cared about stopping Islamist terrorism they would have fought against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan when they launched an attack against Israel well after Israel was established.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@allal231 We had a pact with South Korea, we were obligated to defend them from communist pigs like you. Yes Korea was one country but it became two AFTER WWII during which Americans took the Southern half of the Peninsula and the USSR took the Northern Half, then the North Koreans tried to take over the rest of the peninsula and tried to spread that idealistic communist shit. And if it werent for Stalin, than all of the Russia and the Republics wouldn't have had to go through the "Great Terror"
moviegoinggamer 9 months ago
its human nature to kill and take over. look at human history america is not the only country hypocrites.
TheHumanUnity 10 months ago
@TheHumanUnity yes its true all capitalist coutries have that history
allal231 10 months ago
Guys guys take it easy. what goes around comes around. Time will come when it is their turn to burn in hell. if my country did such thing i would fucking demonstrate and show my people what kind of shitt heads we have. but US is proud of its murderes army. So I hope US citizent go throw this shit!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 "So I hope US citizent go throw this shit!"
humans always wish death for other humans. humanity is slowly dieing
TheHumanUnity 10 months ago
@TheHumanUnity
you call US for humans? gimme a fucking break!! Humans care about other people! US citizent DONT GIVE A FUCK u know why? because of the wars they get benefits. cheap oil, cheap food etc!!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 humans don't care about shit. the only thing humans are good at is war, and hate.
TheHumanUnity 10 months ago
@TheHumanUnity no you don't care about other humans, thats different
allal231 10 months ago
@Darre08 r u retarded? because of our wars we have lost a lot. because of iraq and afghanistan we r deeply in debt and r economy has been badly weaken and u people claim that we did 9/11 ourselfs.
britishareawesome69 10 months ago
@britishareawesome69
ARE YOU RETARDED? because of the wars and controlling other countries resources US gets much benefits. nr 1 superpower in the world and can give billions of dollar to puppet countries and their masters Israel. you think US gives a shit about you? you are just a goyim and slave for others. NOW STFU and go work for your master you good animal thing!! US needed 9/11 to make illegal wars and fool their slaves so they cannot revolt in the US against the wars. like you for exampe
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 no dude have u ver even been to the uS or even fucking live in the US like i do? since these wars of started our economy is going down hill and the value of the dollar has decreased immensely ! our country is on the brink of collapse because of these wars and u claim we did it for our benefit. our govt is 14 trillion in debt because of these wars dude why the fuck would we want to do that to ourselfs? u r nothing more than a dude with radical claims
britishareawesome69 10 months ago
@britishareawesome69
what a freaking retarted are you a handicaped? you live in the us and can't understand english, what a brainwashed shit head. I said you are a slave ok? that means you are expendable to the us goverment. you have the most richest people in the world. 1% of us citizent owes like 90 % of the whole country. and you have the manner to call me radical. hahahaha you see how you make fool about your self. 1% owes like 90% now, stfu and go to work and pay to your master israel.
Darre08 10 months ago
@britishareawesome69
please don' tell me you are not expendable, go ask your gov. they will say hell yea, we can sacrifice the whole us for israel, one example. read your idiot history, it will open your eyes. US attacked iraq because israel wanted so, you give away billions of dollar every year to israel. they are not even loans, but tax payers money. like i said you are expendable, deal with it, stop crying. what goes around comes around, It is karma for the millions of deaths us caused. bye
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 You're hilarious, it's amazing that you can type fine with a straightjacket.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
you call me hilarious? man go fuck your sister, rednecks nr one wish!! just do it and shut your barbarian mouth!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 The U.S. govt is not run by Israel nor do we make a contribution to Israel that compares to the notion that we'd be ready to sink our own country for the sake of Israel. We give them billions in aid yes, we don't give our blood. Many nations in the past fund allies by giving them free money, it doesn't mean that they were slaves to the nation they were aiding.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
OMG what a retarted idiot. u know what? Bye bye!!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 WOW! Are these the works of genius you come up with when you put forth your opinions?!?! MY mind is blown!
You can't call me a retarded idiot when you don't offer reasons whym you idiot. You're an idiot because you didn't defend your inspid remarks and your mother and father were siblings
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
My mother and father were siblings? haha you attacking me with culture stuff? AHAHAH hey asshole my culture and traditions has survived for 5000 years and my genes are strong and dominant. Its the UK, american who fuck their sisters. Not us. please you have just came out from caves. learn your history u alcoholic piece of shit!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 I'm glad you're a communist anti-american, your actions and what you say would be detrimental to the side I argue for. You are all rhetoric, insults, and nonsense. You don't have any concrete arguments for the side you argue for, in fact nobody on your side does, you just make it blatantly obvious.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
i dont believe in communism you twat, stupid americunt, who accuse people with such things. you fucking animal with 200 years of history, go and evolve or something! I am a patriotic peace loving human being, I believe in freedom of mankind and independence! I want to see some justice, and that is the fuckers country burn in hell for what they are doing to mine! what goes around comes around. I would be ashamed if my country goes into war with other countries and intefering etc
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 Again you are all rhetoric and insults, when you provide examples, arguments, and well reasoned statements come back to me.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
you started the insults little slave worker for israel!!! I already have proven everything i said! you work for israel (proven, truth)= billions of taxpayers goes to israel and israel interest is nr 1 in the US. u have a savage history about 200 years. (proven, read history books) about, slaves, genocide, racism etc. US, has allways been in wars since 1775 it is proven and recorded just check it in your libary. and alot of war crimes against the humanity with nukes and chemial.
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 I saw you insulting someone else.
No we don't. Simply giving aid to a nation does not mean we work for them. We give them 20 or so billion dollars, that's lunch money compared to the U.S..
1. Nearly all countries in the world had slaves when the U.S. had slaves
2. Racism was very rampant throughout the world when racism was rampant in the U.S.
3. There are no genocides committed by the U.S., we have never attempted to exterminate a group of people.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@quarterxchange
wwwdotearndotorg/hgp/aeti/aeti-1997/native-americansdothtml
I see you are one fuck uneducated animal!!! how will you possible could know anything? omg how dumb i have been, I have talked to one uneducated slave who works for israel! a fucking GOYYIM!!
Darre08 10 months ago
@Darre08 I'm not good at all with matters technical so I have difficulty sorting out all of the symbols from the words, could you simply tell me which keywords to search in google so I can pull up and read over what evidence you want me to look over.
Meanwhile you can look up Guns, Germs, and Steel on Google where it will be on the pbs website and click The Story of Germs, scroll down and it states, "the viruses tore through the continent, killing an estimated 90% of Native Americans."
quarterxchange 10 months ago
@Darre08 Keep in mind that there were many Indian tribes on the continent and they were frequently at war with each other themselves and taking land from one another.
quarterxchange 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darre08
"how will you possible could know anything? omg how dumb i have been"
Perfrect grammar, your intellectual ability is very obvious.
"Better to be be quiet and thought of as a fool than to open your mouth and leave no doubt."
quarterxchange 10 months ago
DEAL WITH IT
Peaty1992 10 months ago
@Peaty1992 They mad.
glun 10 months ago
We're hardly bad. I mean the Mongols brought the Black Death to Europe and killed countless millions in Asia, Europe and the Middle East.
We're just trying to beat a score here, man.
LazerZlorkipzIV 10 months ago
115 dumbs down?? these people have no conscious or souls !!!
ED000111 10 months ago
you forgot to mention the "war on drugs" in colombia and the "war on drugs" in mexico !!! all just a facade to have control !!
ED000111 10 months ago
reason 7,897,753 to not pay taxes.
jcx420 10 months ago
you forgot to add "Bieber fever" at the end. a US manufactured epidemic that has contaminated millions worldwide
jad3948 11 months ago
And you believe in what ? red utopia ? central planned economy ? It didn't work out, and thanks to de US that it help to stop it before spreading on the whole world like some kind of a flue but much more bloody.
yasiu1918 11 months ago
pure manipulation, typical for lefists
yasiu1918 11 months ago
@muslimpower123
Read a history book. Ever since the White Man emerged from his icy cave, he has brought death to all. European history is full of barbaric examples of wanton cruelty and needless slaughter.
When the White Man achieved the power to expand itself across the sea, it just did what was natural....
jomckellan 11 months ago
@jomckellan
you are right im not lying but im just sayin there are also good whites. there are not many but there are and they are muslims. the muslims are the only people where race or skin color doesent matter. the europeans and america are the ones to be blamed and the russians too.
muslimpower123 11 months ago
The White Man is the devil. Where the White goes, death follows.
jomckellan 11 months ago
@jomckellan
not all whites my friend but you are right most of them are. there are also white muslims they are not like that at all.
muslimpower123 11 months ago
@jomckellan
not all whites my friend but you are right most of them are. there are also white muslims they are not like that at all. not every muslim is brown or black but hey im talking like you were a muslim even though i dont know...
muslimpower123 11 months ago
all true but were are we (USA) now and were are you now?, The world is round not flat like this TV (computer) screen that you sit behind, there is good and bad in all people and there land! It's just what side your on and were you go from this! BUT If in your times you happen to come by a (freak you tube name) FillHipLips say to him he had his time now it OURS! USA all the way
THEEND123321 11 months ago
@kilox10001 Engineers, pilots, mechanics say its impossible for some amateur pilot a plane into the pentagon that easily, 1 plane bringing down a whole WTC building, glass and some stones bringing down WTC7, etc. And nice comparison you got there, Conspiracy theorists with holocaust deniers.. Hmm, I like it when you call me a CT, means I'm right, thanks.
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 Why aren't engineers, pilots, mechanics and architects rallying against the U.S. govt for staging 9/11 if most of them agree that planes couldn't take down the towers. I personally know military, and commercial pilots and engineers since my father was an air force pilot and then flew for a commercial liner, they think people like you are insane.
The fact of the matter is that nearly every single peer review study done on the 9/11 collapse disagrees with you.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@kilox10001 I still showed you tons of links you didn't counter: Engineers say there were explosives, you say there weren't, I guess out argument ends here .
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Arguing with 9/11 conspiracy theorists is like arguing with holocaust deniers. While the fact of the matter is is that the vast majority of engineers, pilots, mechanics, and architects concur that 9/11 was in fact a terrorist attack in which Airplanes were used to bring down the towers, pseudo-intellectuals who never put together a car engine, built a house, or flew an airplaine, will give you their expert opinion on what is regarded by actual experts as a major architectual failure.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange What is your opinion? It's alright to be a conspiracist, but extremists take it to far. Do you think it was an inside job? Was the The Plane filled with TNT or some sort of bomb?
AfroGangsta10 1 year ago
@AfroGangsta10 No I simply thing that 9/11 conspiracy theorists are lunatics.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 i wasnt telling any fairy tales kid sorry to disapoint you but youtube is full of them if u wanna here some -_-
MrMeineNamen 1 year ago
@MrMeineNamen No, you are full of them.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 I sent you the vid and you didn't watch it, too bad, what else could reach 1600Cº in the crash site? Yeah, Thermite. Plus what racism? Mind explaining that to me? Oh and since you're at it, you didn't explain to me why there was MOLTEN STEEL on the crash site. Plus, how come the debris fall at freefall speed? WTC 7 collapsed due to.. Ok you gotta be shitting me, how come the debris(Glasses, few plastics) would FLY away from the twin towers and HIT the WTC MAKING IT COLLAPSE. Fail.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 I don't even need to mention the WTC 7 cos the argument would instantly be over and It's fun to make fun of some dumb american kids. About the engineers: watch?v=ssuAMNas1us&feature=related. Plus, how do you explain the building debris falling at FREEFALL Speed? Guess you can't explain that one aswell.. Ah well, how about the termonite explosives? Or how else are you going to explain the MOLTEN STEEL that can only melt at 1600Cº+ and the max temp. jetfuel can achieve is 1200ºC? Hmmm.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Every exprienced engineer SAYS the buildings were built to witstand a terrorist attack of this kind, it has been said 30-40 years ago when they were built. You should watch more news. Plus it's impossible for a plane to bring down a whole structure like that. how about the BOMB explosions people HEARD before the planes hit the towers? Hmm, try explaining that.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 are you stupid? you found a video on youtube... i dont get "valid facts" off any youtube video there IS nothing to counter. come back with real facts and maybe il talk you have your head so far up your butt you just cant stand the fact im winning this argument and just HAS to find something to fight back with. out of options kid stop wasting my time
MrMeineNamen 1 year ago
@MrMeineNamen Then why would I believe a KID that DOESNT EVEN SHOWED ME a YT vid and CANT COUNTER MY FACTS? Lol.. You're automatically winning by just assuming something with no proof and no facts? Nice.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Then prove me why 9/11 wasnt a terrorist attack, just name a small fact and I will easily counter it.. Oh wait, you can't.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Americans are the ones that stereotype, especially the "Turban wearing bad guy" You're the ones that call terrorists everyone thats a muslim because of the american made 9/11. I showed you a vid with FACTS that show the 9/11 was done by your own government, IF you wanted to prove me wrong you could easily counter ANY of the facts they say, if you don't, it means you just CAN'T counter them, Plus, it's not ONE video, its THOUSANDS.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Mhm, you didn't even watch the video, that's not even a home made video, it's a documentary with valid facts that you can't still counter.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
Wnxsilence, please show me where you got the fact that it was singlehandedly the U.S. cavalry that murdered "tens of millions" of native Americans over the course of 100 years rather than the vicious diseases such as smallpox and measeles that were already brought before by European conquistadors and settlers.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@kilox10001 no i apologize that was for the one you were arguing with disregard it im on your side haha
MrMeineNamen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrMeineNamen 1 year ago
@kilox10001 Funny thing you can't counter the VALID FACTS the vid shows.. Typical american "MY COUNTRIES THE BEST!!" "but you havent visitted france, india, japan, finland, russia, etc etc" "WHO THE FUCK ARE U TO TELL ME WHAT TO THINK OMG" "too right im not your Go.. I mean, government that tells you what to think, what to do, when to do, whenever he wants."
Try to counter the FACTS the vid shows, else you're wrong and I win .
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Have you ever lived in the U.S? And if so, assuming the people you disagree with are conservative Americans and knowing the fact that it's the government that funds liberal news shows and organizations who preach what you preach, how can you say that we are simply believing what our government tells us to believe when in fact shows and organizations funded by our government are more in line with your views.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange I did live in the US, very good life, and awesome. Thing is, I like the US as a country, yet i hate the government and the fact that they invade other countries for profit. Taking out the shit they did to other countries and to themselves, I'd say I'd love the US but that's impossible, it's thanks to them the world is as it is.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 We don't invade other countries for profit, that's the most ridiculous thing I've heard. Wars are very expensive and when we spend billions of dollar fighting armies in 3rd world nations we don't get any profit in return.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange You really are brainwashed. Oil? Testing new weapons and tactics on civvies and freedom fighters? That's expensive? Hmm..
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Yes oil is a strategic resource for the west and is a vital asset that keeps our side of the world functioning and the middle east stable and progressive. We are keeping the supply to the west stable, not getting free oil or money. And I'm interested in knowing where the U.S. used weapons and tactics on innocent civilians on purpose.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Hmm.. So you invasion that evolves killing Iraq civilians keeps the middle east stable.. Cool.. Oh, US keeps killing civvies every day, want me to show you one of the million vids out there?
watch?v=is9sxRfU-ik
As you can see even from the comments, people are getting SICK of the US terrorist attacks.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Most sources claim that there are roughly 100,000-150,000 dead civilians, a good number of which are caused by people blowing them selves up in markets, mosques, schools, buses, and in the middle of crowded streets.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Hmm, how many civilian deaths BEFORE the invasion? Cough, Zero, Cough.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Yes in wars civilians die. But before it wasn't much better and I believe most would be willing to die for freedom. Before Hussein gassed his own people and started a few large wars claiming millions of lives and was a threat to all of the Middle East. Iraq also had strict and oppressive laws that are always in place when a dictator is in power. Do you know how many german civilians were killed before WW2, zero. Therefore the Soviets were the terrorists right?
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Err.. Americans kill innocent civilians on purpose, examples? Japan (WWII), Iraq, Vietnam, Afghan, Cuba, etc. Before WWII Germany and the Soviet Union had a peace treaty, AFTER Germans INVADED, RAPED and HUMILIATED innocent Soviet civilians then yes, the soviets completely killed Germany, if it wasn't for them, the whole Europe would be hailing a German dictator right now. I thank God for Hitler's stupidity to attack the Soviets.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Yes and Japan slaughtered perhaps twice as many people as the Nazi's did. The bombings of Japan are not condemned by any other Asian power. China lost 17 million civilians to the Japanese so the U.S. bombing Japan was justified by your logic. We never bombed cuban civilians and the bombings of Vietnam were to eliminate the supply line of the NVA and to bomb out VC positions, not to kill civilians. And we've always used precision bombs in urban Iraqi areas to prevent Civilian deaths.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange You bombed TWO cities FULL OF CIVILIANS, what makes you any different from the japanese dictator that invaded other Asian countries? Nothing. PLUS the japanese weren't attacking anyone when you bombed them, the Emperor had unofficially surrendered, since there were NO BATTLES for more than SIX MONTHS, but no the americans wanted to test their new toy and also wanted supremacy over japan by making them officially surrender.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were Naval ports and munition depots the Imperial armed forces. We killed tens of thousands of combatants at a higher ration to civilian dead than the russians killed when they carpet bombed Finland and Germany. Japan was actively preparing for an invasion and declared that as many as 28 million civilians would fight any allied invasion. We didn't want to slaughter tens of millions of women and children in a gunfight so we bombed two cities killing a fraction.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange EXACTLY, FINALLY SOME ONE UNDERSTANDS. A land invasion of Japan would cause more deaths than the atomic bombs. And Nagasaki, the area in which the bomb detonated was mostly filled up of farms and open lands. And luckily, that was the secondary target. And about the 9/11 conspiracy. I know for a fact that it's not a set up or an inside job. But I can believe that Their was a bomb on there. But I most of the time don't even believe that.
AfroGangsta10 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Oh and: watch?v=JhxsAfw7dqw&feature=related
Nice precision.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Yes that was a mistake. Men carrying objects with shoulder straps in a warzone will cause that confusion.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quPlus, they ATTACKED AN AMBULANCE WITH CHILDREN INSIDE IT, was that a mistake aswell? watch?v=KF2miwIWOE4 Was this a fucking mistake aswell? See why people are starting to hate the US when the time passes by? Information, deadly yo dictators/Invaders/Oppressors, etc etc. Exactly what american government is and WILL BE. Dont take me wrong, I like the US as a country, I loved to spend the some holidays, great country, but what would be a normal person reaction to what they in Iraq? Get me?
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 That was not an ambulance. Ambulances have redcross markings specifically required by international law, the same law that bans enemies from firing on men or vehicals that wear the red cross.
Wow, that video stated 66,000 dead civilians, that's the lowest estimate I've heard.
Yes, they are accidents. It's a terrible strategy to attack civilians when trying to get the civilians to back you and the U.S. knows it. We don't gain anything by spending billions to kill children.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Ambulances when-ether with red cross markings or not do try to get the wounded, that van WITH CHILDREN INSIDE IT was trying to get the wounded UNARMED civilians, You have no excuse here.
66000 dead civvies on purpose as we can all see. After all, they're there for the oil.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Again oil is a vital interest to the world and keeping the oil lines stable keeps countries all over the world stable and their people alive including the Middle East.
They thought those personel were carrying weapons and firing on them to prevent them from escaping is legitimate when you are firing on combatants. Sadly they made a mistake.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarter Wtf are you blaming on the soviets that don't exist anymore, you really are an american patriot "ALL RUSSIANS MUST DIE" Kid, Cold War is over, Russian military supremacy over US has been proven, but there's not going to be a war okay? Stop fearing the russians they wont kill you.. *Cough* Sadly *cough*. K so since the US army can't distinguish cameras from wea.. Oh wait, it's the US army, They're forgiven. Plus, how about the 100s of vids Wikileaks shows us? Are they accidents aswell?
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 You're a moron, you brought up Vietnam, Korea, WW2, Cuba, etc, which were conflicts the Soviets had direct involvement in and conflicts in which communist forces actively took up arms to fight. I don't fear the Russians, seeing as we've outmatched them for the past 60 or so years I don't consider them a threat, I'm just stating the fact that in the conflicts you listed communist forces killed just as much if not more civilians than the United States.
quarterxchange 1 year ago
@quarterxchange Theres no more communist forces, and as I said, the Russian army is far better than the US one at the moment. Plus americans always killed innocent civvies for actually no purpose. And 250 000 civilians are part of the naval ports? Couldn't you just target the munition depots? Plus, you didn't had a fight with the Japs for 6+months, what was the point? There was basically a unofficial cease fire. I know you wanted to provoke the soviets, but failed.
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@r4f4st4n1 Currently Russian miltiary officers disagree with you. They know that currently the U.S. posses the most powerful military.
The battle of Okinawa lasted nearly 2 months from April to June 1945. There was no "unofficial ceasefire".
We destroyed nearly every military target in Japan and they were still fighting. The only way to send the message was to show them the destructive power we had at our disposal.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange How come US possesses the most powerful military if it's russian that has the best tank? Best jet? Best ARs? Best SF? Hmm..
There wasn't any battle going on for months, the americans had no reason to BOMB -->CIVILIAN<-- major cities
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 Because they dont. We aren't spending 10 times as much money on defense than the Russians on inferior equipement and training.
The battle of Tokyo bay was towards the end of July. What are you going to say next, "There wasn't any battle going on for DAYS"
What were we supposed to do, wait for them to regroup and rebuild while we waited for however long it takes for them to surrender?
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange I said and I'll keep saying MONTHS, the americans were too busy trying to be better than the soviets in Europe, but as usual they failed. You could've use another choice other than bombing civilian cities, but if that seems right to you, it's ok, I understand most americans retardation problems, after all, even today you bomb and kill civilians, I don't know why am I even bothering with this.
If russians are inferior, how come they have better equipment?
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 I just listed a naval battle that took place a couple weeks before the bombings. We weren't trying to be better than the soviets, we just left them alone.
Please list other choices so I can shoot them down.
They don't have better equipment and any level headed Russian officer would agree. They are just developing 5th generation fighters, they have no supercarriers, they don't have stealth ships and they havn't mass produced a new helicopter in years.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange There were Soviet spies in the US and vice versa at that time, there was always an opposition between the two countries. You shot nothing down, the US had a new toy that they had to test to show off their power and inspire fear to specially the Soviet union, thanks to that they bombed two cities full of civilians. Want me to repeat? Bomb. Two. Cities. Full. Of. Civilians. With. An. Atomic. Bomb.
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 Yes there were but we weren't trying to be "better" than them in the wars ends.
You havn't listed any other choices but I guarantee you I will.
For the second time please list other options the U.S. could have taken to force a surrender out of Japan. Come on list them so I can thrash you on them. You won't be too hard to make a fool of.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange Choices like that? Using bombers with normal frag bombs to destroy the military bases? Hmm..
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 What military bases? We bombed them to the point where their navy, and air force were obsolete. We launched massive bombing campaigns on factories and military targets. Again their navy and air force were wiped out and we were carpet bombing their military targets months before the atomic bombs.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange So and you needed to deal the final strike on the innocent civvies.. Hmm, I see you changed these past years, now when you invade a country you bomb the civvies during the war and not just in the end of the war. I don't think that's improvement.
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 The only military targets that were available were in the cities.
Please list other options the U.S. could have taken. You still have not come up with another valid option that can stand up to common sense.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
Your army still uses the M16A4 which is not 40 years old. Plus, aren't you, Americans, that keep comparing your 40 year old rifle to Russians 70 year old rifle? Hmm.. Even the newer ARs such as the scar, doesnt compare to the AN in terms of accuracy, reliability and in this case, rate of fire, it can surpass the AN in stopping power due to it's 7.62mm round but its as obvious as 1+1=2 I guess? Those military bases were minor, even if they were a threat, theres something called: precision bombing
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago
@r4f4st4n1 I didn't compare the M-16 to the Ak-47. I can show you videos of newer weapons being submerged in the sand and water and still firing. I also looked up the rate of fire on the world.guns.ru and found that the An-94 has a rate of fire from 600-1800 while the modern M16s have a rate of fire of 700-950. So the An-94 can empty it's clip a second faster than the M16 in fact full auto has been becoming so obsolete that soldiers in Iraq don't use it.
quarterxchange 11 months ago
@quarterxchange The AN94 has a worse RoF than the M16s, plus, high RoFs are an advantage if you know how to use full automatic (Apparently americans dont as they empty their clips, that why the M16 has a 3 round burst on it LOL). And the civilians that were suffering due to the war wanted to die for their country? Hmm, america propaganda at its finest.
r4f4st4n1 11 months ago