I've been to the place Aristarchus drew the heliocentric image on the ground, Karvouni mountain on Samos above the village of Ambelos... it's not sandy though and he wouldn't have been able to use a stick to draw it on the ground but rather the flat rocks could have been placed in a way to make the outline...
The so-called 'backround radiation' noise: the noise of the plasma field that Tesla was playing with, pumping truly massive amounts of 'volts of pressure'.
monsta123x....a Roman sockpuppet on googles conditioningtube. Islam is the ALL, just as the Katholikos is the ALL, just as Sanatam Dharm is the ALL, etc etc etc. Religion born of Priesthoods is NOT the ALL.
Nyheritis...the beauty of science is that it is merely a choice of organization of data. A new sight and new organization proofs a new reality. The reason Greek words and the vedas join nicely...is that "intellectual Greece" was born of the Gymnos Sophistes, ancient vedic holy men.
@Nyhteritis Keep telling lies nyhteris, it suits you. 'Science' is merely organization of data. Veda...high science, and other things. The greek language is built from the understandings of veda, and nothing else. Whereas the Latin language is a bastardization and inversion of Word.
There is no division between maths (both schools of philosophy and science). Fallen priesthoods establish divisions where there are none.
If science is merely organization of data, then veda is high organization of data? What’s your point?
You know nothing about Greek language so stop relating it with veda or anything else that you read in scifi magazines. Science needs proof, but you're just repeating dogmas about “high science”.
You don’t want to understand the differences between science and your "science", but if you keep trolling, and been offensive then I’ll have to stop this meaningless conversation.
@Nyhteritis No, you'll have to stop the conversation because I expose while you attempt to conceal. I know quite alot about the form upon which the ancient Greek Language is based.
There is no difference in science, just application of similar concepts using different euphamism.
Additionally, I'm not 'trolling', I'm undertaking discourse. That you disagree with me is no basis for the claim of 'trolling'. You're merely looking for a public excuse to do what you have already decided to do.
@abbesieyes How do you think you expose anything? You are talking about science but in a religious way. Repeating the same things without proving them. That's the priest's way of talking.
I do not need any excuse to do anything. Anyway, i give you one last chance to PROVE, NOT to REPEAT.
The reader may also invetigate lexiline(.)com and the work of Andis Kaulins. Science, in its best form...the stripping away of assumption, base error, and lies...to create or re-establish.
The reader can investigate the Vedic writings themselves (many have been transcribed into english)...many have not. Sanskrit was/is capable of containing entire systems within a word...so much is yet to be done.
"Jagadguru Swami Bharti Krisna Tirthahji Maharaj, Shankracharya of Sharda Peeth and Goverdham Math discovered 16 Vedic Sutras and 13 Upsutras in the Parishistha of Atharvved" - the basis of mathematics long before any other culture. Vedas 1, Nyhteritis 0.
@Nyhteritis Aristarchus was simply commenting. Just because others who came before did not include their proofs (or we have not yet found them) does not imply they never existed. Proofs within Vedic scripture have only recently been noted for mental mathematical processes erroneously attributed to far later European minds. The wise mind investigates prior to blatant and empty denial.
@abbesieyes Aristarchus was a scientist and not a story teller . For the vedic (and all the other) texts and myths it is rather simple. If there is not any methodology, not observation/experiment , not logical thought/calculation, not conclusion/proof, then it is definitely NOT science.
Using your imagination, you can easily say that vedic texts, the Greek mythology and some legends from other ancient civilizations are high science in metaphor/code. If you are happy with this it is ok with me. But for sure all these are not considered as sciences by any serious scientist , all over the world
@Nyhteritis One notes that the mass of 'serious scientists' do not account for breakthroughs. It is the individual free thinker that does. Your empty denial is noted for what it is. 'used some thousand greek words'...the limitations of a derivative language.
@Nyhteritis I have to wholly agree. Also in the vedas you find bizarre medical treatments based on demonic sources and lots of talk that just makes the idea of it being metaphoric ludicrous.
@abbesieyes So carl sagan's state of mind gave him cancer??? You really are as absurd as the christian faith healers. Completely absurd. You keep talking in simmiltudes,, that will spread your wisdom......NOT....
@sickofgod69 Excessive acid in the body system is the breeding ground for 'cancers' and other illnesses...thus the explosion of said coinciding with lifelong intakes of heavily acidic softdrinks, highly processed sugars which are turned to alcohol in the gut via the digestion process and other compounds.
Beyond that, your attack shows your 'illness' quite plainly.
@abbesieyes Beauty of science is that with a few words you can describe a lot of things. On the contrary you talk and talk without saying any reasoning (this is a texts effect). I have already explain what IS science. You and many others may believe in texts, voodoo, alchemy, astrology and any other mambo jumbo but I don’t understand why you compare all these with science. Why you keep using science and technology every day and you don’t just go in a desert to live a life based on your beliefs?
@Nyhteritis Wrong. You need to review the correspondence of Nikola Tesla and Lord Kelvin. The Vedic Texts are high science in metaphor/code. They also have blatant areas where they openly refer to Cosmology, energy, natural cycle, the nine forms of time, Astronomy...to name but a few.
Tesla used the words Akasha, Prana and luminiferous ether to describe the source, existance and construction of matter.
@abbesieyes Tesla used 3 vedic words and some thousands Greek words and meanings in his work. (You can find thousands of Greek words in scientific vocabulary).
The Vedics had (long before anyone else) established heliocentrism, gravitation, acknowledged stars as distant suns, understood both 'moonlight' and eclipse, and spoke of time in terms of atoms of time. Eurocentrism, just as errant as the concept of an earth centered universe.
Copernicus got it from Aristarchus, who was only commenting on what Hesiod and others had put in meter and verse, who had learned what they knew from the traveling Vedic peoples. Philosopher/Poets...the mixture of Canonic and Harmonic thought.
@abbesieyes Aristarchus did not just "commenting". He invented the heliocentric theory. He used observation, logical thought / calculations to make his conclusions.
This is far away from telling stories without any proof.
That is why Aristarchus is one of the Pioneers of Science and not just another story teller.
@abbesieyes Science is objective, but metaphor/code stories are subjective.
In science if 1000 people see the number 100, they are ALL going to say this is 100.
In metaphor/code stories, 1000 people may have 1000 different explanations to give. (If they are free minds and you dont guide them to your specific explanation).
Many ancient myths, stories, texts are interesting and can trigger our imagination. Lets keep them this way and do not mix them up with unrelated things.
@Nyhteritis Science is subjective, insofar as it is a hierarchy of assumption (theory). It only somewhat solidifies into the 'objective' if the theory works (to one extent or another) in reality.
One notes that anytime we advance, we do so as the outcome of both the canonical and the harmonic in thought. You could learn alot from the series 'Connections'.
Myth is but a popular rephrasing of reality. Nyhteritis...not a scientist at all.
The Greeks had explained allready things like, the solar system,about starts,about galaxys, about the planets,about blackholes(Heraclet),about the 3 ratations of the earths axis,about the moon-and this shadowside and they even told about there are mountains on the moon which is corect as we do know today.-
What He passingly refers to as the "mystics", which people don't realize was monotheistic religion, were the ones responsible for setting us back 5-600 years.
Exactly: revelation as a method of discovery is inherently anti-democratic, elitist and cultist, because it makes knowledge the exclusive preserve of a certain few. Scientific method, on the other hand, is available to all if they get an education in it, as are most modern academic disciplines.
One only has to look at the surge in interest in the study, collection and categorisation of fossils and living species in the 19th century to see the tremendous mass-potential of science.
No mystics are people who do not believe in understanding or possibility of knowledge. This could have included ceirtain sects of monotheistic relgiions (small minority sects and had more to do with not understanding God rather than nature). It is most likely referring to ancient skeptics like Pyrho and Sectus Empiricus who believed there is no knowledge.
In fact Agnosticism in an epistemological stance can be considered mysticism, it has little to do with religion.
Monotheisticreligion held us back for 5-600 years? Please explain, it was a monotheistic culture in which the scientific revolution arised, and it was a monotheistic culture in which Algebra, Calculus, almost all branches of Science today, and Universities (higher institutions of learning) arose.
Monotheistic culture is probably the most adavancing force in Science and Mathematics.
Polytheism is responsible for the scientific revolution, calculus, algebra, and nearly all branches of science? Yeah, someone definately needs to take a course in history of science. Don't make a comment if you're going to look stupid. I'm an Agnostic btw, but I'm just not as stupid as you are.
They aren't called the dark ages. The term dark ages arose from biased protestant criticism and enlightenment anti-authority dogma. It wasn't so dark, and Christianity had nothing to do with it being "dark" if it was "dark".
While you are correct that those disciplines did arise in these cultures, they did so DESPITE the prevalence of monotheism, not because of it. I stand by my original statement.
Addicted to this series. But alas, he fails to mention the pioneering contributions of Muslim astronomers. Totally overlooks that era of scientific advancement in which Muslim astronomy flourished and to which the Renaissance scientists are deeply indebted.
Yeah - as I understand it when the Byzantine Christians were plunging the west into the dark ages Muslim scholars were picking up the fumble and running with it, so to speak.
True. In fact, it's been argued that it was the Persians, not the Byzantines, who were the last true Hellenistic society. They picked up where the Romans left off, having already been perhaps the most sophisticated society in the world for almost a thousand years.
From the Persians, this knowledge of ancient classical thinkers was passed on to the Arabs. When examining the interesting cosmological events of the Dark and Middle ages, we have to look to Chinese and Muslim records.
@bohotkhoob - How did being Muslim (a religion) have anything to do with what the people in the middle east at that time discovered or developed. I mean if Mohammad had discovered these things in his seizure induced babbling and his family member had written them down sure. I'll bet you a lot of the things that could have been discovered were not for fear of being killed over Muslim dogma.
@IlovemyGlock21 When Middle-Eastern Muslims commit terror, their terrorism is labeled "Islamic", rather than "Middle-eastern" or "Arab". But when their forefathers made seminal contributions to physics, literature, geography, medicine, algebra, etc that had nothing to do with the fact that they followed Islam.
Btw, I hope that most people here subscribe to Carl's humanistic philosophy and thus refrain from insulting each other's religious beliefs if they wish to hold a logical debate.
@bohotkhoob Its from Babylonian, Sumerian, and Egyptian science. They came well after, and improved upon these principle yes, but more or less due to geography and taking over said nations. Hence where the science in the bible and kuran originate from.
@skydome29 All generations pick up where previous ones left off. Newton's famous words "though we are dwarfs, we stand on the shoulders of giants and look even farther" attest to that. No one can deny that Muslim scientists played a key role in the advancement of science from the Greek era to the Renaissance. Yet most Western historians of science choose to ignore that historic fact and completely skip over those centuries of great scientific achievement.
Agreed, he was amazing, just the way he ezplains things and puts idea into peoples heads and how he did it so well, the man loved what he did, and he left this world way to early :(, Carl Sagan is a hero..
This has been flagged as spam show
I've been to the place Aristarchus drew the heliocentric image on the ground, Karvouni mountain on Samos above the village of Ambelos... it's not sandy though and he wouldn't have been able to use a stick to draw it on the ground but rather the flat rocks could have been placed in a way to make the outline...
LoweredNJuiced 1 month ago
Aristarchus of Samos was a great man and luminary unappreciated in his own time and today.
ImaginedWriter 10 months ago
No "big bang" (product of another Jesuit lie).
The so-called 'backround radiation' noise: the noise of the plasma field that Tesla was playing with, pumping truly massive amounts of 'volts of pressure'.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
monsta123x....a Roman sockpuppet on googles conditioningtube. Islam is the ALL, just as the Katholikos is the ALL, just as Sanatam Dharm is the ALL, etc etc etc. Religion born of Priesthoods is NOT the ALL.
Nyheritis...the beauty of science is that it is merely a choice of organization of data. A new sight and new organization proofs a new reality. The reason Greek words and the vedas join nicely...is that "intellectual Greece" was born of the Gymnos Sophistes, ancient vedic holy men.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Intellectual Greece and science has nothing to do with any ... "holy men".
Intellectual Greece and science is one thing. Holly men, priests, astrologers etc are completely different things.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago 5
@Nyhteritis Keep telling lies nyhteris, it suits you. 'Science' is merely organization of data. Veda...high science, and other things. The greek language is built from the understandings of veda, and nothing else. Whereas the Latin language is a bastardization and inversion of Word.
There is no division between maths (both schools of philosophy and science). Fallen priesthoods establish divisions where there are none.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes
If science is merely organization of data, then veda is high organization of data? What’s your point?
You know nothing about Greek language so stop relating it with veda or anything else that you read in scifi magazines. Science needs proof, but you're just repeating dogmas about “high science”.
You don’t want to understand the differences between science and your "science", but if you keep trolling, and been offensive then I’ll have to stop this meaningless conversation.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis No, you'll have to stop the conversation because I expose while you attempt to conceal. I know quite alot about the form upon which the ancient Greek Language is based.
There is no difference in science, just application of similar concepts using different euphamism.
Additionally, I'm not 'trolling', I'm undertaking discourse. That you disagree with me is no basis for the claim of 'trolling'. You're merely looking for a public excuse to do what you have already decided to do.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes How do you think you expose anything? You are talking about science but in a religious way. Repeating the same things without proving them. That's the priest's way of talking.
I do not need any excuse to do anything. Anyway, i give you one last chance to PROVE, NOT to REPEAT.
Nyhteritis 8 months ago
That's a good one, you can calculate the rough distance to other stars with a pie plate.
Jammieg001 1 year ago 3
The reader may also invetigate lexiline(.)com and the work of Andis Kaulins. Science, in its best form...the stripping away of assumption, base error, and lies...to create or re-establish.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
The reader can investigate the Vedic writings themselves (many have been transcribed into english)...many have not. Sanskrit was/is capable of containing entire systems within a word...so much is yet to be done.
"Jagadguru Swami Bharti Krisna Tirthahji Maharaj, Shankracharya of Sharda Peeth and Goverdham Math discovered 16 Vedic Sutras and 13 Upsutras in the Parishistha of Atharvved" - the basis of mathematics long before any other culture. Vedas 1, Nyhteritis 0.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis Aristarchus was simply commenting. Just because others who came before did not include their proofs (or we have not yet found them) does not imply they never existed. Proofs within Vedic scripture have only recently been noted for mental mathematical processes erroneously attributed to far later European minds. The wise mind investigates prior to blatant and empty denial.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Aristarchus was a scientist and not a story teller . For the vedic (and all the other) texts and myths it is rather simple. If there is not any methodology, not observation/experiment , not logical thought/calculation, not conclusion/proof, then it is definitely NOT science.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
Using your imagination, you can easily say that vedic texts, the Greek mythology and some legends from other ancient civilizations are high science in metaphor/code. If you are happy with this it is ok with me. But for sure all these are not considered as sciences by any serious scientist , all over the world
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis One notes that the mass of 'serious scientists' do not account for breakthroughs. It is the individual free thinker that does. Your empty denial is noted for what it is. 'used some thousand greek words'...the limitations of a derivative language.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis I have to wholly agree. Also in the vedas you find bizarre medical treatments based on demonic sources and lots of talk that just makes the idea of it being metaphoric ludicrous.
sickofgod69 1 year ago
@sickofgod69 No more ludicrous than you just made yourself via that statement. ;~)
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes The vedas clearly state that some illness are brought on by demonic possession. Thats just a fact.
sickofgod69 1 year ago
@sickofgod69 Illness is a state of mind. As to statements in the vedas...'I have spoken in simmiltudes'.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes So carl sagan's state of mind gave him cancer??? You really are as absurd as the christian faith healers. Completely absurd. You keep talking in simmiltudes,, that will spread your wisdom......NOT....
sickofgod69 1 year ago
@sickofgod69 Excessive acid in the body system is the breeding ground for 'cancers' and other illnesses...thus the explosion of said coinciding with lifelong intakes of heavily acidic softdrinks, highly processed sugars which are turned to alcohol in the gut via the digestion process and other compounds.
Beyond that, your attack shows your 'illness' quite plainly.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Beauty of science is that with a few words you can describe a lot of things. On the contrary you talk and talk without saying any reasoning (this is a texts effect). I have already explain what IS science. You and many others may believe in texts, voodoo, alchemy, astrology and any other mambo jumbo but I don’t understand why you compare all these with science. Why you keep using science and technology every day and you don’t just go in a desert to live a life based on your beliefs?
Nyhteritis 1 year ago 2
@Nyhteritis Wrong. You need to review the correspondence of Nikola Tesla and Lord Kelvin. The Vedic Texts are high science in metaphor/code. They also have blatant areas where they openly refer to Cosmology, energy, natural cycle, the nine forms of time, Astronomy...to name but a few.
Tesla used the words Akasha, Prana and luminiferous ether to describe the source, existance and construction of matter.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Tesla used 3 vedic words and some thousands Greek words and meanings in his work. (You can find thousands of Greek words in scientific vocabulary).
So what?
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis sophist.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes no no no only quran has the true scientific miracles. It predicts big bang and universe expansion. All other scriptures are wrong.
monsta123x 1 year ago
The Vedics had (long before anyone else) established heliocentrism, gravitation, acknowledged stars as distant suns, understood both 'moonlight' and eclipse, and spoke of time in terms of atoms of time. Eurocentrism, just as errant as the concept of an earth centered universe.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes The vedics are very interesting texts, but they are not even close to what we call Science.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
Copernicus got it from Aristarchus, who was only commenting on what Hesiod and others had put in meter and verse, who had learned what they knew from the traveling Vedic peoples. Philosopher/Poets...the mixture of Canonic and Harmonic thought.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Aristarchus did not just "commenting". He invented the heliocentric theory. He used observation, logical thought / calculations to make his conclusions.
This is far away from telling stories without any proof.
That is why Aristarchus is one of the Pioneers of Science and not just another story teller.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis The proofs were incorporated in their supposed story telling...and only a few noted it. That you do not is not surprising.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
@abbesieyes Science is objective, but metaphor/code stories are subjective.
In science if 1000 people see the number 100, they are ALL going to say this is 100.
In metaphor/code stories, 1000 people may have 1000 different explanations to give. (If they are free minds and you dont guide them to your specific explanation).
Many ancient myths, stories, texts are interesting and can trigger our imagination. Lets keep them this way and do not mix them up with unrelated things.
Nyhteritis 1 year ago
@Nyhteritis Science is subjective, insofar as it is a hierarchy of assumption (theory). It only somewhat solidifies into the 'objective' if the theory works (to one extent or another) in reality.
One notes that anytime we advance, we do so as the outcome of both the canonical and the harmonic in thought. You could learn alot from the series 'Connections'.
Myth is but a popular rephrasing of reality. Nyhteritis...not a scientist at all.
abbesieyes 1 year ago
The Greek subtitles are wiggin me out.
LongandGeneric 2 years ago
@LongandGeneric if you are wigging by the Greek letters it's because you are a barbarian ,and you are lost in your ignorance!
nixter888 2 years ago
EXCELLENT.
CARL SAGAN is an inspiration.
mohfoz77 2 years ago 8
The Greeks had explained allready things like, the solar system,about starts,about galaxys, about the planets,about blackholes(Heraclet),about the 3 ratations of the earths axis,about the moon-and this shadowside and they even told about there are mountains on the moon which is corect as we do know today.-
Gaiuslotus9 4 years ago 18
What He passingly refers to as the "mystics", which people don't realize was monotheistic religion, were the ones responsible for setting us back 5-600 years.
adobster 3 years ago
Exactly: revelation as a method of discovery is inherently anti-democratic, elitist and cultist, because it makes knowledge the exclusive preserve of a certain few. Scientific method, on the other hand, is available to all if they get an education in it, as are most modern academic disciplines.
One only has to look at the surge in interest in the study, collection and categorisation of fossils and living species in the 19th century to see the tremendous mass-potential of science.
Myndir 3 years ago
not even close.
KonstantineTheGreat1 2 years ago
@adobster:
No mystics are people who do not believe in understanding or possibility of knowledge. This could have included ceirtain sects of monotheistic relgiions (small minority sects and had more to do with not understanding God rather than nature). It is most likely referring to ancient skeptics like Pyrho and Sectus Empiricus who believed there is no knowledge.
In fact Agnosticism in an epistemological stance can be considered mysticism, it has little to do with religion.
ogirv101 2 years ago
@adobster:
Monotheisticreligion held us back for 5-600 years? Please explain, it was a monotheistic culture in which the scientific revolution arised, and it was a monotheistic culture in which Algebra, Calculus, almost all branches of Science today, and Universities (higher institutions of learning) arose.
Monotheistic culture is probably the most adavancing force in Science and Mathematics.
ogirv101 2 years ago
Monotheism may be more philosophically mature than polytheism, but it is still as stifling for science as any other supernatural belief.
RandomTickTock 2 years ago
Depends... As long as the monotheism doesn't make any claims of the supernatural in the natural world, then it's not stiffling to science at all.
ogirv101 2 years ago
Actually all of those things stem for POLYtheistic religions and predate both Christianity and Islam.
nikkisixxual 2 years ago
Polytheism is responsible for the scientific revolution, calculus, algebra, and nearly all branches of science? Yeah, someone definately needs to take a course in history of science. Don't make a comment if you're going to look stupid. I'm an Agnostic btw, but I'm just not as stupid as you are.
ogirv101 2 years ago
So you're saying the dark ages never happened?
Riff625 1 year ago
@Riff625:
They aren't called the dark ages. The term dark ages arose from biased protestant criticism and enlightenment anti-authority dogma. It wasn't so dark, and Christianity had nothing to do with it being "dark" if it was "dark".
ogirv101 1 year ago
@ogirv101
While you are correct that those disciplines did arise in these cultures, they did so DESPITE the prevalence of monotheism, not because of it. I stand by my original statement.
adobster 1 year ago
Addicted to this series. But alas, he fails to mention the pioneering contributions of Muslim astronomers. Totally overlooks that era of scientific advancement in which Muslim astronomy flourished and to which the Renaissance scientists are deeply indebted.
bohotkhoob 4 years ago 2
Yeah - as I understand it when the Byzantine Christians were plunging the west into the dark ages Muslim scholars were picking up the fumble and running with it, so to speak.
adobster 3 years ago
True. In fact, it's been argued that it was the Persians, not the Byzantines, who were the last true Hellenistic society. They picked up where the Romans left off, having already been perhaps the most sophisticated society in the world for almost a thousand years.
From the Persians, this knowledge of ancient classical thinkers was passed on to the Arabs. When examining the interesting cosmological events of the Dark and Middle ages, we have to look to Chinese and Muslim records.
Myndir 3 years ago
boho - who are some of the Muslim astronomers to which you refer? I am a big astronomy buff so would like to know who they are. Thanks.
dlhoneysnaps 2 years ago
Famous names include Al-Biruni, Avorroes, al-Tusi. lookup wikipedia for "Astronomy in medieval Islam".
bohotkhoob 2 years ago
@bohotkhoob - How did being Muslim (a religion) have anything to do with what the people in the middle east at that time discovered or developed. I mean if Mohammad had discovered these things in his seizure induced babbling and his family member had written them down sure. I'll bet you a lot of the things that could have been discovered were not for fear of being killed over Muslim dogma.
IlovemyGlock21 1 year ago
@IlovemyGlock21 When Middle-Eastern Muslims commit terror, their terrorism is labeled "Islamic", rather than "Middle-eastern" or "Arab". But when their forefathers made seminal contributions to physics, literature, geography, medicine, algebra, etc that had nothing to do with the fact that they followed Islam.
Btw, I hope that most people here subscribe to Carl's humanistic philosophy and thus refrain from insulting each other's religious beliefs if they wish to hold a logical debate.
bohotkhoob 1 year ago
@bohotkhoob Its from Babylonian, Sumerian, and Egyptian science. They came well after, and improved upon these principle yes, but more or less due to geography and taking over said nations. Hence where the science in the bible and kuran originate from.
skydome29 1 year ago
@skydome29 All generations pick up where previous ones left off. Newton's famous words "though we are dwarfs, we stand on the shoulders of giants and look even farther" attest to that. No one can deny that Muslim scientists played a key role in the advancement of science from the Greek era to the Renaissance. Yet most Western historians of science choose to ignore that historic fact and completely skip over those centuries of great scientific achievement.
bohotkhoob 1 year ago
Hi Nyhteritis
Do you have more of this serie?
Tvebak2 4 years ago
Hi Tvebak2
I don't have something more for now , but maybe i'll get some DVDs from this serie in next month.
If you are looking for something particularly, let me know and maybe i can find it.
Nyhteritis 4 years ago
Hi Nyhteritis
No nothing in particularly, just wanted the rest :)
But I'm looking forward for the next addition, if it comes :)
Best Regards
Tvebak2 4 years ago
How fruitless this magnificent man's opinion and work will be, when no one will stand up and change how the world does see.
Thuph6hi 4 years ago
what a great human being
baxill23 4 years ago
Agreed, he was amazing, just the way he ezplains things and puts idea into peoples heads and how he did it so well, the man loved what he did, and he left this world way to early :(, Carl Sagan is a hero..
bankeh 4 years ago