They thought this was a good idea? It probably ruined thier campaign, taking it down from the internet may have also caused Streisand Effect on this video. Making it worse...
I'm sorry for forcing my opinion on this subject but I'm offended that some people are defending 10:10 Blowing up kids in a gory fashion is a joke? dude what the fuck? I'm sorry but the ad wasn't funny never was never will be.
And i don't se it as a joke, i se it as a symbol or hint as to how important the message is. Don't just watch it and go back to normal, notice and react. Art has always been, and should be provocative
I don't see it as a joke either. That's why I made the video.
I am paying attention to the message, I am getting the hint. It's...
"Adhere to the tenants of our faith, to our ideology, or we'll kill you."
And while you believe capitalism is all garbage, stroking our balls to encourage consumerism, I believe this environmental alarmism, and now fanaticism, is using fear and intimidation to push a socialist agenda. Your post only confirms this for me. Thanks for commenting.
@orwellsspectre But its not about intimidation, its just about the reaction, the import of the message, do you seriously think someone is going to kill you? They aren't trying to put fear in anyone, other than the fear of the reality of the matter. And maby some people would call it fanaticism or whatever, i would not. Look, do you seriously se this video as a form of confession of the environmentally aware that they want murder? Cause its not like its a subtle message.
Personally i like this advertisement, and that is a big deal for me to say "hate commercials". Not politically correct and adapted to look like its fun and easy, its necessary! it needs to be done and we need to change. The message needs to be understood. So ye, hurray for advertisement to be evolving into real information instead of some capitalistic garbage, stroking your balls to make you buy shit
WTF are they actually serious this is the sickest form of propaganda and the evil twisted people who orchestrate this false climate change garbage should all be held accountable for misleading humanity! just ask the rothchild banking cartel why they publish childrens books n false pieces of hollow bile propaganda like this SO THE FUCKERS CAN GET EVEN MORE POWER MORE MONEY and are left alone to consume the worlds resources whilst the 96% are in a coma saying if we buy bulbs we cn save the planet
Regardless of the intent, I don't feel that the original video should be considered a joke.
Of course, there are those who might disagree with me, but I'll simply trace their IP addresses back to their ISP, retrieve their customer details, locate their home addresses, murder their families while I make them watch, then burn their homes down with them inside.
Of course, I'm just joking to make a point. Hilarious, eh?
Parody satire- you're doing it *really* fucking wrong... o.o
So...no body here gets that the video was a parody? The maker of this video and all of these commentators are really that stupid? You really are against going green because of Osama Bin Laden?
I wrote a lengthy response to your comment on my home page, but I can no longer stand YouTube's format for posting comments when it becomes a longer discussion. I have set up a website who you should be able to link to via my profile if you wish to see my response. Others are welcome to view as well.
The website is brand new, and an experiment, so bear that in mind.
@orwellsspectre Yeah, I'm back in school now. No time for that. I'm not trying to be dismissive, just busy. Plus, you won't agree that it's just a joke. Just because you don't find it funny doesn't make it not a joke. And just because it's offensive doesn't make it not a joke. That's my opinion. And yours is that he is being serious.
So we are at an impasse anyway. I enjoyed our time regardless. Good luck with your blog!
@dlewis1498 You greatly simplify my position, but as you mention, I now have a blog where people can view it in its entirety. I do thank you for both commenting and being civil in our discussion, brief though it was. Good luck in school.
Todo o fundamentalismo, julgo, é potencialmente terrorista, totalitário. Podem dizer que aqui há tão só intenções publicitárias de choque no combate ao dito CO2 antropogénico. Mas sabendo nós das cada vez maiores reticências da parte de cientistas não capturados pelos interesses económicos do negócio montado à volta do “vilão” CO2, devemos ficar algo preocupados com toda esta histeria.
This is an actual quote of the maniac behind this atrocity:
"Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody's existence on this planet? Clearly we don't really think they should be blown up, that's just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start?"
@shiznaziboodles This is probably just a piece of disinfo put out to make the few environmentalists there are out there look bad or maybe its just put out by a frustrated minority. I mean why shouldn't people cut down on their driving just a little or switch over to an alternative fuel for their car or house? Because the real answer is real change is hard work and all the fat asses think they are entitled and the world's resources belong to them.
My interpretation was... The 'message' Teacher: Calm cool, centre of education! Exec: I know how it works, that's why I'm up here & you're down there! Coach: I have the experience of age! This is where it gets REALLY sinister! Sound engineer: I'm in control of the studio, you do what I say! Listen to us. No pressure. Shock & horror of survivors: The REAL message. Toe the line or you're next! Dave.
no pressure? no choice! - that's exactly right. no one has to say anything about helping our environment because eventually......we will have no choice when we see the signs.
Sadly, this is how many, if not most AGW proponents actually feel. Climatologists once toiled in relative obscurity, until global warming became all the rage. Now they're furious that we're taking their glory and power away. Meanwhile there are far more pressing issues for the world's population. A warmer planet may be ''inconvenient'' but children face poverty, famine, pestilence and disease along with genocide, slavery and terror. That's not up for debate. Very nice edit orwellsspectre!!!
I don't care what excuses these Warmer whackos offer: I see this "No Pressure" advert as their wet dream. Hitler *first* started talking about eliminating Jews. People didn't think he meant it either.
The "Young Turks" first started talking about eliminating Armenians and Anatolian Greeks. They weren't taken seriously either.
As for the theoretical tree painting yes it would be intentionally divisive and on reflection I suppose the film could be said to be as well, however the sentiment behind such things is what makes them either horrific, humorous or poignant."
I think we will leave it at that. Those who viewed "No Pressure" with alarm already have grave misgivings about some Greenie's agenda and worldview, and this film was a flashing warning sign confirming some of the worst fears...
Those who wonder what all the fuss is about think it was an overreaction based on misperceptions of the green movement and 1010 in particular.
Having seen some disturbing things in environmentalist thought in the last decade, I am definitely in the former camp. I may do a film about this.
I am not unsympathetic to the "outrageous" humor claim, ala Monty Python. I thoroughly enjoy even the morbid humor, including the "How not to be seen" skit...
In a way, Badger is correct in that the intent and disposition of those telling "the joke" can matter, but that goes back to what people thing the hard core Greens are really about, something which cannot be debated here.
Suffice to say, even with intent taken into account, there should be limits on what is "just for a laugh" or not. I have a broad spectrum on this, but it is not limitless, and in the age and times we are in, "No Pressure" was far beyond my acceptable spectrum.
That is obvious; both that we disagree and that I am entitled to my own view.
It would have been perhaps better for you to have extended that acknowledgment to the other people on this thread, however strongly you disagreed with them.
I consider this topic closed between us. People can read the respective arguments and make up their own minds.
I reserve the right to delete further comments on this thread that I consider repetitive or unproductive.
@orwellsspectre To extend it to others on this thread I would have to name them as some are reasonable views whether differing from mine or not whereas others are damaging, ignorant sometimes borderline racist comments that I would never acknowledge as constructive or useful. I'll leave it there and never darken your door again, its been an interesting discussion, whether any good came of it I can't know but interesting all the same. Peace and good will to all.
Badgerboy, the side conversations are interesting, but time-consuming. Please restate, in one post, what the message of "No Pressure" was as you saw it, and what 1010 was trying to accomplish by producing and then releasing it.
Never mind. I just realized you have been putting me on, Badgerboy,. and I have missed the brilliant satire you've worked up. Man, you HAD me! I really thought you were here trying to defend "No Pressure". You are good. GOOD! I should have realized it with the phrase "grasp the humour and poignancy prevalent", but no, I missed it. Got sucked in. Whew! Funny stuff, though!
With still ZERO hard scientific evidence that human CO2 has any measurable affect on earth's radiation budget, those who think it is true are doing so purely on the basis of FAITH that it must be true. That does indeed make it a religion by any standard you wish to apply. Going further to depict DEATH as a person's only alternative to submitting to their 'faith', (faith in a 'consensus' bought with YOUR tax dollars BTW..), has a very strong similarity to Islamic jihadism.
@Mikeishere1st I'm sorry what?! No seriously what the hell are you talking about, that actually made no sense whatsoever, please try to form a coherent argument next time. Also making statements of fact when you clearly haven't actually looked into what your talking about really isn't a good idea in my book.
@orwellsspectre In no way whatsoever have I abused people and my position is in no way ridiculous, however if I have in some way offended you or others then I apologize. I would strongly suggest you do not start censoring this thread unless of course its racist, homophobic or generally abusive comments of which none of mine are. Freedom of speech and democratic debate are very important things, surely it makes more sense to let people make their own decisions on my views, good or bad.
This is BLATANTLY FALSE. My God, do you have any capacity for self-examination? How about a dictionary?
I will censor this thread in any way I want, as it's on my channel. Dems the rules. Since you included "generally abusive", though, I would be clear to delete your comments anyway.
"Freedom of speech and democratic debate are very important things, surely it makes more sense to let people make their own decisions"
But not if they make decisions that you don't agree with, right? Then you need to call them idiots and tell them that they are not smart enough to understand the brilliance of you and your fav director.
Debate involves actually engaging people in discussion, not starting off by calling them idiots. You are a walking contradiction...
I'm not commenting on 10:10 as a movement just on what I know about Richard Curtis et al who made this film as well as having a good knowledge of the dark British humour that it takes its ideas from (Brass eye, Blue jam, The league of gentlemen, Psychoville and even some Monty Python) taken in this context it is clear that it is not the work of a radical eco terrorist cell but an extremely clever piece of thought provoking work.
If you go view some of those you might just "get it".
@orwellsspectre It is in no way a back-pedal, I never at any point claimed to be a supporter of 10:10 or to be defending them, at every step I have been defending this particular film and the people who made it. I will address your second point in my next post.
@TheBadgerboy1977 This is dishonest. The people who made it ARE 1010. Period. 1010 was the one who organized the project, and hosted it on their site, and the people who worked on donated their time to do it; they were not contracted out to do so. Ok, you may not be dishonest, and are merely misinformed.
@orwellsspectre Its basically an extreme satire on some peoples view of eco groups as those wanting to push their view on others at all costs and its in the manner of a great tradition of dark British comedy of which iv'e already mentioned several examples. It's designed to get people discussing things and in that I think its supremely successful, however the problem arises that countries such as America do not seem to understand this style of humour and therefore will take it on face value.
"It's designed to get people discussing things and in that I think its supremely successful..."
Oh, its done that, no doubt. Problem is, the thing that most people seem to be discussing, Americans, Brits, Greens, Non-Greens, is that this film was not funny, was appalling, and has set-back the Climate Change movement quite a bit. Have I got any of this wrong? Better think before you answer.
@orwellsspectre I was talking about the particular style of dark humour that crops up in a mild form on occasion in Monty Python and not the entirety of their work which I know is popular there, the Hollywood bowl gig being hilarious for example. "And do you think this film managed to diminish or reinforce that perception?" I'm not saying they've been entirely successful in their goal (time will tell), but that was the idea behind it.
"I'm not saying they've been entirely successful in their goal (time will tell), but that was the idea behind it."
The the idea failed categorically, Badgerboy, did it not? Don't try to dodge by using "time will tell". No one is going to look back in 6 months and say, "That was brilliant!" 1010 has experienced a across the board backlash as the VAST MAJORITY people took the meaning of "No Pressure" to be the direct OPPOSITE of what you claim was intended.
@orwellsspectre Furthermore I feel extremely offended by your suggestion that I would be anything other than respectful, I may have derided some people about their extreme views (quite rightly in my view to be honest), however I am nothing but respectful to those who would enter into an intelligent discussion such as yourself.
@orwellsspectre As I clearly stated my respect is reserved for those that deserve it, I do not and should not respect those who viciously attack others ie 10:10 and the green movement in general purely based on a misconception as those who caused me to make such an angry statement did.
Your second statement on this thread was to call everyone idiots and insinuate they were all stupid if they had a problem with "No Pressure". So, basically, you feel you owe no respect to anyone who does not agree with your opinion on something. Check. Got it.
Let's move on to the questions I am posing above. This mini-thread is closed.
@orwellsspectre I did not call everyone idiots or those with an opposing view to mine. Just those who took it literally without putting any thought into why they may have made a film such as this, its a fact that they are not threatening people, not my "opinion" but an irrefutable fact. And I do not apologize for insulting thoughtless bullys.
"Just those who took it literally without putting any thought into why they may have made a film such as this, its a fact that they are not threatening people, not my "opinion" but an irrefutable fact."
AGAIN, the facts directly contradict you. The vast majority of everyone who saw it, INCLUDING OTHER CLIMATE CHANGE ADVOCATES, thought the film sent entirely the wrong message, YES or NO?
@orwellsspectre The choice word there being "thought" in which they are wrong as the "fact" is that was not their aim, no matter how its interpreted. Also the "vast majority" of which you speak is but a drop in the ocean and the majority of those will not have seen the film in context or quite possibly have not seen it at all and are just going on hear say.
Fact: Curtis produced a film that most people who saw it had the exact opposite reaction than which was intended, as stated by you.
As a film maker, if most of your intended audience completely misinterprets what you were "going for", the problem is not with them, but with you.
Your stand is apparently people were too dense to understand the message, but either they actually got the right message, or Curtis did a horrible job conveying the message. (Cont)
"'vast majority" of which you speak is but a drop in the ocean and the majority of those will not have seen the film in context or quite possibly have not seen it at all and are just going on hear say."
This is a pointless distraction. We are not discussing those who have not seen it. We are discussing the reactions of those who had seen it.
@orwellsspectre There was a case in the UK recently where two well known and well liked comedians and presenters played a possibly ill judged prank which was aired mistakenly by their radio show, at the time it aired it garnered a few complaints about the norm for any comedy show. However after being reported in a fairly right wing newspaper and sensationalised it then received thousands more complaints from those who had not heard the broadcast and resulted in unavoidable suspensions for both.
@TheBadgerboy1977 Now obviously many of the complaints about "no pressure" will have been about the graphic nature of it or worries about misunderstanding's which are perfectly valid, but many more will be from those same people who have said it "made me want to burn tyres" and that "they're terrorists and should be shot". These are direct quotes from other threads on this same subject and those views are just plain ignorant I'm afraid, unfortunately these people are much more vocal than others.
@orwellsspectre Lol, unfortunately not that's the most depressing part, taken in context they were their actual opinion's and they're are several others like them in this very thread as well "I knew it. Environmentalists are terrorists." for example.
Hey, I kind of like that idea. You've obviously been misinterpreting the poignant and clever depiction of extreme anti-Green radicals reactionary stance utilized as a thought-provoking satire. Why, oh WHY, can’t you be smarter and understand what these people are trying to say, Badgerboy!?!
@orwellsspectre Rofl, interesting idea there however there is no ambiguity in those comments they are what they are and have made themselves clear in their own thoughtless way. The film by its nature is fairly ambiguous and like all art very divisive, hence the wildly varying viewpoints on it. However yet again I state there is a difference between a viewpoint and a misconception and its the misconception's I take umbridge with.
Wow! When you get into character, you really go for it!
Okay, I will play along...
Ambiguous? Why, Badgerboy, if the film is ambiguous does not mean it is "open to more than one interpretation"? And if it IS 'open to more than one interpretation', does that not then mean that far from being idiots or dense, those who viewed it as a direct threat or as menacing interpreted it one way (along with most who saw it) and you simply interpreted it another?
"open to more than one interpretation, but definitely not any interpretation that Badgerboy does not agree with"
And, if, as you say, the film was intentionally divisive (Tending to cause disagreement or hostility between people), then was not the interpretation of people who reacted with hostility in fact correct? I mean, if the point of "No Pressure" was in fact divisive, then it was intended to provoke hostility, right?
"So, people reacting in a hostile manner were in fact correct in their interpretation of the film, and not in fact Idiots who did not "get it". Right?"
@orwellsspectre My god man, "all" art is divisive, I'm not saying the point of the film was to be intentionally so just that by the very nature of it being an artistic format it will be. Of course it can be interpreted in many ways but if those interpretations come from a false assumption in the first place (that of there intention being to kill dissenters) then that interpretation itself becomes false.
@orwellsspectre The majority of people do not create art to be intentionally divisive it is but a side effect for most, there are exceptions of course and you may believe this to be one however I do not and as far as I'm concerned we are both entitled to our opinions as they are subjective. Calling them fascists or generally threatening them is not a subjective opinion as it is based on a falsehood.
@orwellsspectre I'm sorry but are you being deliberately obtuse here. If I painted a flower I would not intend to be divisive I have just simply painted a flower, however once someone else views it it becomes divisive as in one person may like it another may not, that does not mean my intention was to cause that argument. Now if I put a swastika on that flower I would be deliberately being divisive in that I intentionally put something in that picture to offend people and cause disagreement.
@orwellsspectre There is nothing whatsoever inconsistant or contradictory about any of my comments thus far and as for being "wordy" I make no excuse for using the English language to its fullest. I believe in fact it is you who have not been able to make their case and are now trying to make personal attacks against me as you clearly fail to grasp the logic which your desperate ramblings lack.
"There is nothing whatsoever inconsistant or contradictory about any of my comments..."
Well, they are on full display for people to judge, now, aren't they? I will let the public judge that for themselves.
And you are the last person who should be whining about personal attacks.
Now, how about addressing the tree example? Would painting a tree with climate change deniers, some children, hanging by their necks be considered INTENTIONALLY divisive?
@orwellsspectre I'm more than happy to let my comments stand or fall on there own merit and am more than thankful your censorship threat was rescinded, I'll decline to comment on the alleged "whining" as that can also be judged by others quite easily. As for the theoretical tree painting yes it would be intentionally divisive and on reflection I suppose the film could be said to be as well, however the sentiment behind such things is what makes them either horrific, humorous or poignant.
@orwellsspectre Not to mention the fact that a large amount of them use a worrying amount of aggression to get their point across (and no I do not believe questioning their intelligence to be aggressive).
I guess they have never heard of sunspots? The Earth's orbit around the sun? The last ice age ended 10,000 years ago, and glacial periods occur on average every 40,000 years. This is a naturally occurring event on planet Earth.
Now, if your fear is global warming by CO2, watch this video, it's quite amazing, but the globalists will never want you to see this, as they don't seem to believe in science:
Environmentalism Fanatic Scum just try it and this world will give you a war you'll never believe so run and hide mother fuckers because the people are wise to your trick go back to hell were you came from you gutless power-tripping scum. And thank you for posting this video becaus i have wanted to see this and make my conclusion on it.......really bad and really mentall i have to say and the quote at the end is a real brain buster and questionible.
Let them keep running these commercials (without government funding of course). The populace is catching on to the so-called Green Movement as global terrorists; they are harming their own cause. These same people are calling the Tea Party crazy, go figure!
Dougal Wilson made this piece of shit film and he has got his own channel here on you tube valled radarmusicvideos. I wonder if his own grandparents watch this clip with his chlidren over christmas.
What arrogance, ignorance and stupidity this clip is. It is not comedy it is a Marxist attitude to kill anyone who won't go along with the regime. It is sick.
@quizerry I'm guessing Irony and satire aren't in your vocabulary then.
To not find it funny or be offended by its graphic nature is one thing but to take it literally and actually believe that they condone blowing up people who disagree with them is plain stupidity of the highest order.
@TheBadgerboy1977 I don't find blowing up school children satire. This clip is repulsive in every way. Nothing about it is amusing. What exactly do you think their message is? To put fear into children?
@TheBadgerboy1977 There is always a degree of truth to every "just kidding" and this is a rare glimpse into the psyche of the propagators of the green movement. the message here is clear:
"You are cattle and your life is of similar consequence, oppose us and be destroyed"
This is not an extreme view in their minds because they are fighting for the very survival of the planet, like a soldier in war, except this time they have declared war on dissenters
To every single person who has taken this video literally and believes that the renowned humanist and charity campaigner Richard Curtis et al are eco mentalists who want to blow people up that disagree with them, YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS!!!!!!!!
Just because your simple minds cannot grasp the humour and poignancy prevalent in this excellent slice of genius does not mean its not there, stop taking things literally and on face value and seriously try to engage your brains a bit more.
@TheBadgerboy1977 If it's such a slice of genius that us poor mortals should look upon it and be enthralled, why did they have to take it down within minutes? My brain is fully engaged when you imply you will murder my children if they don't comply to your agenda. That is nothing to joke about. If this had only adults being killed, it'd still be stupid, but it wouldn't touch on a very primal instict, defending your young. Doesn't sound like genius to me.
@pehpig Unfortunately there's more than enough puritanical busy body's in the world that would happily complain about something they clearly have no understanding of for if they did understand it they would not be taking it at face value and complaining in the first place.
1010 Global really screwed the pooch on this one. I never heard of them before, now I only know them as "those people who want to blow you up for thinking differently from them". I understand all the actors and techs worked for free. I still think it cost them dearly.
@pehpig Exactly. In their lame-ass non-apology apology they say that "many people" thought the film was "extremely funny," but "unfortunately, some did not." Got that? "Hey, most people think it's funny, but a small minority of humorless prigs don't." I wonder how long it's going to take them to realize how much permanent damage they have done to their own cause? Climategate, Copenhagen fiasco, and now this. Stick a fork in it, AGW is finished.
Take note of the reactions of the compliant ones: Sheer horror. The message is as much for them as for those who do not comply. Toe the line, or join the dissenters in bloody destruction. ='[.]'=
And we believed you the first time... because since you cannot rationally state a reasonable position "force" is the only argument you have left (and I do mean "left")
@kelteckid If I understand you correctly, you are misunderstanding me, I am not part of this. I was making a sarcastic comment that these greenies are contributing to "climate change" by blowing up non-believers.
And here is a message for the "environmentalists". Come get me you POS. Let's do it . You want a final battle, come get some. I welcome you to Tennessee. Come on, lets PARTY! Oh, you probably ought to dump the pretty pink imaginary button and pick up some hardware on the way down.
Apparently, they'll just PRETEND to take "no" for an answer, tell you "That's fine, no pressure -- YOUR CHOICE," and then destroy you right in front of your friends and colleagues.
And considering that Islamic terrorists like Osama bin Laden like blowing people up, it does make (sick) sense to quote bin Laden about global warming being the fault of "all of the industrialized countries, especially the big ones" at the end of this video.
Whenever the totalitarians come out of the closet they have to kill the disbelievers. Otherwise people start to think for themselves, which sows doubt. And doubt is the last thing these demagogues want.
Of course, a number of these "environmentalists" would like that device just to kill off a few billion humans...
I think everyone who cares about the environment should stop eating meat, especially ribeye steaks. That way it will be much cheaper for me. Thanks in advance!
Except that eliminating enough of the demand will then cause costs to rise because economies of scale (production, distribution, retail) no longer can be used. But I applaud your intention.
Awesome remix to show how dangerous these commie "enviro" nutsacks are.
There's no proof of man made global warming, but they continue in their quest to CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIVES AND REDISTRIBUTE YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY TO LAZY LEECHES.
GLOBAL WARMING IS A MASSIVE SCAM ON THE IDIOT MASSES.
They thought this was a good idea? It probably ruined thier campaign, taking it down from the internet may have also caused Streisand Effect on this video. Making it worse...
OJSlaughter93 1 month ago
I'm sorry for forcing my opinion on this subject but I'm offended that some people are defending 10:10 Blowing up kids in a gory fashion is a joke? dude what the fuck? I'm sorry but the ad wasn't funny never was never will be.
Mattrules64 1 month ago
And i don't se it as a joke, i se it as a symbol or hint as to how important the message is. Don't just watch it and go back to normal, notice and react. Art has always been, and should be provocative
kladdigost 1 month ago
@kladdigost
I don't see it as a joke either. That's why I made the video.
I am paying attention to the message, I am getting the hint. It's...
"Adhere to the tenants of our faith, to our ideology, or we'll kill you."
And while you believe capitalism is all garbage, stroking our balls to encourage consumerism, I believe this environmental alarmism, and now fanaticism, is using fear and intimidation to push a socialist agenda. Your post only confirms this for me. Thanks for commenting.
orwellsspectre 1 month ago 2
Comment removed
kladdigost 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@orwellsspectre But its not about intimidation, its just about the reaction, the import of the message, do you seriously think someone is going to kill you? They aren't trying to put fear in anyone, other than the fear of the reality of the matter. And maby some people would call it fanaticism or whatever, i would not. Look, do you seriously se this video as a form of confession of the environmentally aware that they want murder? Cause its not like its a subtle message.
kladdigost 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Personally i like this advertisement, and that is a big deal for me to say "hate commercials". Not politically correct and adapted to look like its fun and easy, its necessary! it needs to be done and we need to change. The message needs to be understood. So ye, hurray for advertisement to be evolving into real information instead of some capitalistic garbage, stroking your balls to make you buy shit
kladdigost 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WTF are they actually serious this is the sickest form of propaganda and the evil twisted people who orchestrate this false climate change garbage should all be held accountable for misleading humanity! just ask the rothchild banking cartel why they publish childrens books n false pieces of hollow bile propaganda like this SO THE FUCKERS CAN GET EVEN MORE POWER MORE MONEY and are left alone to consume the worlds resources whilst the 96% are in a coma saying if we buy bulbs we cn save the planet
th1sisnotr 4 months ago
Regardless of the intent, I don't feel that the original video should be considered a joke.
Of course, there are those who might disagree with me, but I'll simply trace their IP addresses back to their ISP, retrieve their customer details, locate their home addresses, murder their families while I make them watch, then burn their homes down with them inside.
Of course, I'm just joking to make a point. Hilarious, eh?
Parody satire- you're doing it *really* fucking wrong... o.o
WhiteHawkUK 5 months ago 2
Anybody who has politically incorrect thoughts deserves to die. Say hello to 1984 (Heil Stalin!, Heil Gore!, Heil UN!, Heil Hitler!).
pkpapers 10 months ago
So...no body here gets that the video was a parody? The maker of this video and all of these commentators are really that stupid? You really are against going green because of Osama Bin Laden?
Well...alright.
dlewis1498 11 months ago
@dlewis1498
I wrote a lengthy response to your comment on my home page, but I can no longer stand YouTube's format for posting comments when it becomes a longer discussion. I have set up a website who you should be able to link to via my profile if you wish to see my response. Others are welcome to view as well.
The website is brand new, and an experiment, so bear that in mind.
orwellsspectre 11 months ago
@dlewis1498
I responded to your comments at my blog, Dlewis. Awaiting your reply.
orwellsspectre 11 months ago
@orwellsspectre Yeah, I'm back in school now. No time for that. I'm not trying to be dismissive, just busy. Plus, you won't agree that it's just a joke. Just because you don't find it funny doesn't make it not a joke. And just because it's offensive doesn't make it not a joke. That's my opinion. And yours is that he is being serious.
So we are at an impasse anyway. I enjoyed our time regardless. Good luck with your blog!
dlewis1498 11 months ago
@dlewis1498 You greatly simplify my position, but as you mention, I now have a blog where people can view it in its entirety. I do thank you for both commenting and being civil in our discussion, brief though it was. Good luck in school.
orwellsspectre 11 months ago
Support the environment, or I'll fuckin' kill you!
SickBritKid 11 months ago
this is pretty bloody for a christian vid
radiofreak56 1 year ago
Todo o fundamentalismo, julgo, é potencialmente terrorista, totalitário. Podem dizer que aqui há tão só intenções publicitárias de choque no combate ao dito CO2 antropogénico. Mas sabendo nós das cada vez maiores reticências da parte de cientistas não capturados pelos interesses económicos do negócio montado à volta do “vilão” CO2, devemos ficar algo preocupados com toda esta histeria.
enigmatico51 1 year ago
You must conform.
Charmolution 1 year ago
This is an actual quote of the maniac behind this atrocity:
"Doing nothing about climate change is still a fairly common affliction, even in this day and age. What to do with those people, who are together threatening everybody's existence on this planet? Clearly we don't really think they should be blown up, that's just a joke for the mini-movie, but maybe a little amputating would be a good place to start?"
Franny Armstrong, founder of 10:10
franciscojavierm 1 year ago
Creepy and gross, the paranoid global fanatics show their true colour: red.
XxXLucozadeXLoverXxX 1 year ago
So basically the message is;
If your not green the planet will die.
if your not green you will die.
*FACEPALM*
myg0tpurepunk 1 year ago
GO GREEN OR DIE.
jakeyboy69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
not even hitler did this...
tomatoedrama1 1 year ago
Great little video, nicely edited together.
1010fail 1 year ago
Yep... the greenies have definitely become like the rightwing. Purge out all moderate voices in favor of mindless violent ones.
shiznaziboodles 1 year ago
@shiznaziboodles This is probably just a piece of disinfo put out to make the few environmentalists there are out there look bad or maybe its just put out by a frustrated minority. I mean why shouldn't people cut down on their driving just a little or switch over to an alternative fuel for their car or house? Because the real answer is real change is hard work and all the fat asses think they are entitled and the world's resources belong to them.
anewlow23 1 year ago
There's a new parody at my site. Using multiple short parody clips it tells the story backward.
"Was This Originally A Prank? (gore obscured)"
watch?v=AnVp7TdbTa8
PlaylistHound 1 year ago
Global Governance Eco-Fascists show thier TRUE colors.
yakyakyak69 1 year ago
@yakyakyak69 "Eco Fascists" what exactly has been DONE in the name of the environment? Very Very Very little.
anewlow23 1 year ago
@anewlow23 Obviously you've been living under a rock and know Very Very little about the subject.
yakyakyak69 1 year ago
@yakyakyak69 Enlighten me.
anewlow23 1 year ago
Check out Mewwwww1's video "No pressure 10/10 Mini film Secret Commentary Found!!!!!"
They hacked the code on "No Pressure!" and found a hidden commentary track from the producers!
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DrDave953 1 year ago
The 1010 campaign is basically the perfect example of how Big Green is brainwashing people. Down with big green.
wheelzwheela 1 year ago
@wheelzwheela Who is Big Green?
anewlow23 1 year ago
no pressure? no choice! - that's exactly right. no one has to say anything about helping our environment because eventually......we will have no choice when we see the signs.
we are too stubborn to work with each other.
the earth is going to reset.
sk8bow 1 year ago
it's big businesses job to change not mine
Mattwav 1 year ago
Gillian Anderson is a terrorist and a kiddie murderer
daviddevall 1 year ago
Oddly coincidental with the analogy that ended the conversation with BadgerBoy, comes word of this appalling environmental ad.
hxxp://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/06/another-brilliant-moment-in-agw-marketing/
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
Sadly, this is how many, if not most AGW proponents actually feel. Climatologists once toiled in relative obscurity, until global warming became all the rage. Now they're furious that we're taking their glory and power away. Meanwhile there are far more pressing issues for the world's population. A warmer planet may be ''inconvenient'' but children face poverty, famine, pestilence and disease along with genocide, slavery and terror. That's not up for debate. Very nice edit orwellsspectre!!!
JackOfAllClubs 1 year ago
I'm not even religious, but Jesus still said it - the Truth - the best:
essene com/GospelOfPeace/
No mumbo-jumbo, only physiological explanations (for a change;-)
runarvollan 1 year ago
I don't care what excuses these Warmer whackos offer: I see this "No Pressure" advert as their wet dream. Hitler *first* started talking about eliminating Jews. People didn't think he meant it either.
The "Young Turks" first started talking about eliminating Armenians and Anatolian Greeks. They weren't taken seriously either.
It's just a joke! Dark humour! Ha! Ha!
Yeah riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!
LordKelvin100 1 year ago
"@TheBadgerboy1977
As for the theoretical tree painting yes it would be intentionally divisive and on reflection I suppose the film could be said to be as well, however the sentiment behind such things is what makes them either horrific, humorous or poignant."
I think we will leave it at that. Those who viewed "No Pressure" with alarm already have grave misgivings about some Greenie's agenda and worldview, and this film was a flashing warning sign confirming some of the worst fears...
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
Those who wonder what all the fuss is about think it was an overreaction based on misperceptions of the green movement and 1010 in particular.
Having seen some disturbing things in environmentalist thought in the last decade, I am definitely in the former camp. I may do a film about this.
I am not unsympathetic to the "outrageous" humor claim, ala Monty Python. I thoroughly enjoy even the morbid humor, including the "How not to be seen" skit...
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
In a way, Badger is correct in that the intent and disposition of those telling "the joke" can matter, but that goes back to what people thing the hard core Greens are really about, something which cannot be debated here.
Suffice to say, even with intent taken into account, there should be limits on what is "just for a laugh" or not. I have a broad spectrum on this, but it is not limitless, and in the age and times we are in, "No Pressure" was far beyond my acceptable spectrum.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre I politely but strongly disagree with your summary, however you are of course entitled to your view.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
That is obvious; both that we disagree and that I am entitled to my own view.
It would have been perhaps better for you to have extended that acknowledgment to the other people on this thread, however strongly you disagreed with them.
I consider this topic closed between us. People can read the respective arguments and make up their own minds.
I reserve the right to delete further comments on this thread that I consider repetitive or unproductive.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre To extend it to others on this thread I would have to name them as some are reasonable views whether differing from mine or not whereas others are damaging, ignorant sometimes borderline racist comments that I would never acknowledge as constructive or useful. I'll leave it there and never darken your door again, its been an interesting discussion, whether any good came of it I can't know but interesting all the same. Peace and good will to all.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
Badgerboy, the side conversations are interesting, but time-consuming. Please restate, in one post, what the message of "No Pressure" was as you saw it, and what 1010 was trying to accomplish by producing and then releasing it.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
Never mind. I just realized you have been putting me on, Badgerboy,. and I have missed the brilliant satire you've worked up. Man, you HAD me! I really thought you were here trying to defend "No Pressure". You are good. GOOD! I should have realized it with the phrase "grasp the humour and poignancy prevalent", but no, I missed it. Got sucked in. Whew! Funny stuff, though!
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
With still ZERO hard scientific evidence that human CO2 has any measurable affect on earth's radiation budget, those who think it is true are doing so purely on the basis of FAITH that it must be true. That does indeed make it a religion by any standard you wish to apply. Going further to depict DEATH as a person's only alternative to submitting to their 'faith', (faith in a 'consensus' bought with YOUR tax dollars BTW..), has a very strong similarity to Islamic jihadism.
Mikeishere1st 1 year ago
@Mikeishere1st I'm sorry what?! No seriously what the hell are you talking about, that actually made no sense whatsoever, please try to form a coherent argument next time. Also making statements of fact when you clearly haven't actually looked into what your talking about really isn't a good idea in my book.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
You are apparently just here to abuse people, and not defend your ridiculous positions.
You will address my comments first, or I will delete anything further that you say here.
First and last warning.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre In no way whatsoever have I abused people and my position is in no way ridiculous, however if I have in some way offended you or others then I apologize. I would strongly suggest you do not start censoring this thread unless of course its racist, homophobic or generally abusive comments of which none of mine are. Freedom of speech and democratic debate are very important things, surely it makes more sense to let people make their own decisions on my views, good or bad.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"In no way whatsoever have I abused people..."
This is BLATANTLY FALSE. My God, do you have any capacity for self-examination? How about a dictionary?
I will censor this thread in any way I want, as it's on my channel. Dems the rules. Since you included "generally abusive", though, I would be clear to delete your comments anyway.
(Continued...)
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
"Freedom of speech and democratic debate are very important things, surely it makes more sense to let people make their own decisions"
But not if they make decisions that you don't agree with, right? Then you need to call them idiots and tell them that they are not smart enough to understand the brilliance of you and your fav director.
Debate involves actually engaging people in discussion, not starting off by calling them idiots. You are a walking contradiction...
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
I'm not commenting on 10:10 as a movement just on what I know about Richard Curtis et al who made this film as well as having a good knowledge of the dark British humour that it takes its ideas from (Brass eye, Blue jam, The league of gentlemen, Psychoville and even some Monty Python) taken in this context it is clear that it is not the work of a radical eco terrorist cell but an extremely clever piece of thought provoking work.
If you go view some of those you might just "get it".
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"I'm not commenting on 10:10 as a movement just on what I know about Richard Curtis"
Sounds like a little back-peddle on your part, but I will let that go...for now.
"extremely clever piece of thought provoking work."
Address this, please. How is "No Pressure" clever? What is "thought provoking" about it?
Be respectful.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre It is in no way a back-pedal, I never at any point claimed to be a supporter of 10:10 or to be defending them, at every step I have been defending this particular film and the people who made it. I will address your second point in my next post.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 This is dishonest. The people who made it ARE 1010. Period. 1010 was the one who organized the project, and hosted it on their site, and the people who worked on donated their time to do it; they were not contracted out to do so. Ok, you may not be dishonest, and are merely misinformed.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Its basically an extreme satire on some peoples view of eco groups as those wanting to push their view on others at all costs and its in the manner of a great tradition of dark British comedy of which iv'e already mentioned several examples. It's designed to get people discussing things and in that I think its supremely successful, however the problem arises that countries such as America do not seem to understand this style of humour and therefore will take it on face value.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"countries such as America do not seem to understand this style of humour"
Completely false. Monty Python, for example, is extremely popular in the States, and has been for decades.
"some peoples view of eco groups as those wanting to push their view on others at all costs"
And do you think this film managed to diminish or reinforce that perception?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
Continuing...
"It's designed to get people discussing things and in that I think its supremely successful..."
Oh, its done that, no doubt. Problem is, the thing that most people seem to be discussing, Americans, Brits, Greens, Non-Greens, is that this film was not funny, was appalling, and has set-back the Climate Change movement quite a bit. Have I got any of this wrong? Better think before you answer.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre I was talking about the particular style of dark humour that crops up in a mild form on occasion in Monty Python and not the entirety of their work which I know is popular there, the Hollywood bowl gig being hilarious for example. "And do you think this film managed to diminish or reinforce that perception?" I'm not saying they've been entirely successful in their goal (time will tell), but that was the idea behind it.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
"I'm not saying they've been entirely successful in their goal (time will tell), but that was the idea behind it."
The the idea failed categorically, Badgerboy, did it not? Don't try to dodge by using "time will tell". No one is going to look back in 6 months and say, "That was brilliant!" 1010 has experienced a across the board backlash as the VAST MAJORITY people took the meaning of "No Pressure" to be the direct OPPOSITE of what you claim was intended.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Furthermore I feel extremely offended by your suggestion that I would be anything other than respectful, I may have derided some people about their extreme views (quite rightly in my view to be honest), however I am nothing but respectful to those who would enter into an intelligent discussion such as yourself.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"Furthermore I feel extremely offended by your suggestion that I would be anything other than respectful."
Quote, YOU:
"YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS!!!!!!!!
"Just because your simple minds cannot grasp...try to engage your brains a bit more."
Respectful, eh? We must have different definitions of that word. Mine is english. What is yours?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre As I clearly stated my respect is reserved for those that deserve it, I do not and should not respect those who viciously attack others ie 10:10 and the green movement in general purely based on a misconception as those who caused me to make such an angry statement did.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
Your second statement on this thread was to call everyone idiots and insinuate they were all stupid if they had a problem with "No Pressure". So, basically, you feel you owe no respect to anyone who does not agree with your opinion on something. Check. Got it.
Let's move on to the questions I am posing above. This mini-thread is closed.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre I did not call everyone idiots or those with an opposing view to mine. Just those who took it literally without putting any thought into why they may have made a film such as this, its a fact that they are not threatening people, not my "opinion" but an irrefutable fact. And I do not apologize for insulting thoughtless bullys.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"Just those who took it literally without putting any thought into why they may have made a film such as this, its a fact that they are not threatening people, not my "opinion" but an irrefutable fact."
AGAIN, the facts directly contradict you. The vast majority of everyone who saw it, INCLUDING OTHER CLIMATE CHANGE ADVOCATES, thought the film sent entirely the wrong message, YES or NO?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre The choice word there being "thought" in which they are wrong as the "fact" is that was not their aim, no matter how its interpreted. Also the "vast majority" of which you speak is but a drop in the ocean and the majority of those will not have seen the film in context or quite possibly have not seen it at all and are just going on hear say.
An example follows:
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
Fact: Curtis produced a film that most people who saw it had the exact opposite reaction than which was intended, as stated by you.
As a film maker, if most of your intended audience completely misinterprets what you were "going for", the problem is not with them, but with you.
Your stand is apparently people were too dense to understand the message, but either they actually got the right message, or Curtis did a horrible job conveying the message. (Cont)
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
"'vast majority" of which you speak is but a drop in the ocean and the majority of those will not have seen the film in context or quite possibly have not seen it at all and are just going on hear say."
This is a pointless distraction. We are not discussing those who have not seen it. We are discussing the reactions of those who had seen it.
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre There was a case in the UK recently where two well known and well liked comedians and presenters played a possibly ill judged prank which was aired mistakenly by their radio show, at the time it aired it garnered a few complaints about the norm for any comedy show. However after being reported in a fairly right wing newspaper and sensationalised it then received thousands more complaints from those who had not heard the broadcast and resulted in unavoidable suspensions for both.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 Now obviously many of the complaints about "no pressure" will have been about the graphic nature of it or worries about misunderstanding's which are perfectly valid, but many more will be from those same people who have said it "made me want to burn tyres" and that "they're terrorists and should be shot". These are direct quotes from other threads on this same subject and those views are just plain ignorant I'm afraid, unfortunately these people are much more vocal than others.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"those same people who have said it "made me want to burn tyres" and that "they're terrorists and should be shot"
Hey, maybe they meant it as 'extreme satire'....
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Lol, unfortunately not that's the most depressing part, taken in context they were their actual opinion's and they're are several others like them in this very thread as well "I knew it. Environmentalists are terrorists." for example.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
Hey, I kind of like that idea. You've obviously been misinterpreting the poignant and clever depiction of extreme anti-Green radicals reactionary stance utilized as a thought-provoking satire. Why, oh WHY, can’t you be smarter and understand what these people are trying to say, Badgerboy!?!
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
Oh, but wait. Maybe YOU ARE yourself a satire of reactionary knee-jerk environmental elitist leftism, and I have been failing to get that all along!!
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Rofl, interesting idea there however there is no ambiguity in those comments they are what they are and have made themselves clear in their own thoughtless way. The film by its nature is fairly ambiguous and like all art very divisive, hence the wildly varying viewpoints on it. However yet again I state there is a difference between a viewpoint and a misconception and its the misconception's I take umbridge with.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
Wow! When you get into character, you really go for it!
Okay, I will play along...
Ambiguous? Why, Badgerboy, if the film is ambiguous does not mean it is "open to more than one interpretation"? And if it IS 'open to more than one interpretation', does that not then mean that far from being idiots or dense, those who viewed it as a direct threat or as menacing interpreted it one way (along with most who saw it) and you simply interpreted it another?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
I mean, the definition of "ambiguous" is not:
"open to more than one interpretation, but definitely not any interpretation that Badgerboy does not agree with"
And, if, as you say, the film was intentionally divisive (Tending to cause disagreement or hostility between people), then was not the interpretation of people who reacted with hostility in fact correct? I mean, if the point of "No Pressure" was in fact divisive, then it was intended to provoke hostility, right?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
So, people reacting in a hostile manner were in fact correct in their interpretation on the film, and not in fact Idiots who did not "get it". Right?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
OOps, meant to write:
"So, people reacting in a hostile manner were in fact correct in their interpretation of the film, and not in fact Idiots who did not "get it". Right?"
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre My god man, "all" art is divisive, I'm not saying the point of the film was to be intentionally so just that by the very nature of it being an artistic format it will be. Of course it can be interpreted in many ways but if those interpretations come from a false assumption in the first place (that of there intention being to kill dissenters) then that interpretation itself becomes false.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
'"all" art is divisive, I'm not saying the point of the film was to be intentionally so"
If all art is divisive, then creating art is intentionally divisive, because one cannot create which is not divisive, correct?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre The majority of people do not create art to be intentionally divisive it is but a side effect for most, there are exceptions of course and you may believe this to be one however I do not and as far as I'm concerned we are both entitled to our opinions as they are subjective. Calling them fascists or generally threatening them is not a subjective opinion as it is based on a falsehood.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
"The majority of people do not create art to be intentionally divisive it is but a side effect for most,"
NO, it is not a side effect for 'most' but 'all', according to you:
"My god man, "all" art is divisive"
So, which is it. Is MOST art divisive, or is it ALL?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre I'm sorry but are you being deliberately obtuse here. If I painted a flower I would not intend to be divisive I have just simply painted a flower, however once someone else views it it becomes divisive as in one person may like it another may not, that does not mean my intention was to cause that argument. Now if I put a swastika on that flower I would be deliberately being divisive in that I intentionally put something in that picture to offend people and cause disagreement.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
"I'm sorry but are you being deliberately obtuse here."
Yes, I am so terribly sorry for trying to hold you to your own words and for applying logic to your contradictory statements. Very obtuse of me!
Of course, that's your modus operandi, is it not? When you fail to make your case you go to the "Well, you are too stupid to see the genius" card.
You then follow with a wordy excuse for your inconsistency, which is another theme with you. (Cont)
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Therefore all Art is divisive but not always intentionally so.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
You already stated this, and I showed you the illogic of it.
Again...
If ALL art is divisive be definition, then the decision to create art carries with it the intent to be divisive.
If I know art is divisive.,,
And I create art...
I know that I also create division...
Now, to take your swastika analogy and use it against you...
If I paint a picture of a tree, and then paint climate change deniers hanging from it by the neck, is that intentionally divisive or not?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre There is nothing whatsoever inconsistant or contradictory about any of my comments thus far and as for being "wordy" I make no excuse for using the English language to its fullest. I believe in fact it is you who have not been able to make their case and are now trying to make personal attacks against me as you clearly fail to grasp the logic which your desperate ramblings lack.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"There is nothing whatsoever inconsistant or contradictory about any of my comments..."
Well, they are on full display for people to judge, now, aren't they? I will let the public judge that for themselves.
And you are the last person who should be whining about personal attacks.
Now, how about addressing the tree example? Would painting a tree with climate change deniers, some children, hanging by their necks be considered INTENTIONALLY divisive?
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre I'm more than happy to let my comments stand or fall on there own merit and am more than thankful your censorship threat was rescinded, I'll decline to comment on the alleged "whining" as that can also be judged by others quite easily. As for the theoretical tree painting yes it would be intentionally divisive and on reflection I suppose the film could be said to be as well, however the sentiment behind such things is what makes them either horrific, humorous or poignant.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Their basing their comments on a "fact" that is not true therefore the core of their argument is in fact false.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@orwellsspectre Not to mention the fact that a large amount of them use a worrying amount of aggression to get their point across (and no I do not believe questioning their intelligence to be aggressive).
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
I guess they have never heard of sunspots? The Earth's orbit around the sun? The last ice age ended 10,000 years ago, and glacial periods occur on average every 40,000 years. This is a naturally occurring event on planet Earth.
Now, if your fear is global warming by CO2, watch this video, it's quite amazing, but the globalists will never want you to see this, as they don't seem to believe in science:
WATCH: /watch?v=iZ_qmlSeDt0
PLEASE SEND THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!
Politics4Dummies 1 year ago
It was probably funded by obama's stimulus funds.
nolibhere4923 1 year ago
Were those the same type of explosives used to blow up the oil rigs in the gulf by obama? Could be!!!
nolibhere4923 1 year ago
Boy, these libturds are really throwing out for everyone to see just how demented and insane they really are. WOW
uzimodem 1 year ago
That's how the left operates. Join them, or be destroyed, one way or another.
Mal3volution 1 year ago
Environmentalism Fanatic Scum just try it and this world will give you a war you'll never believe so run and hide mother fuckers because the people are wise to your trick go back to hell were you came from you gutless power-tripping scum. And thank you for posting this video becaus i have wanted to see this and make my conclusion on it.......really bad and really mentall i have to say and the quote at the end is a real brain buster and questionible.
TheAmusingHeckler 1 year ago
Let them keep running these commercials (without government funding of course). The populace is catching on to the so-called Green Movement as global terrorists; they are harming their own cause. These same people are calling the Tea Party crazy, go figure!
VigilantOutlaw 1 year ago
Dougal Wilson made this piece of shit film and he has got his own channel here on you tube valled radarmusicvideos. I wonder if his own grandparents watch this clip with his chlidren over christmas.
Ranlon 1 year ago
great editing! cheers. x
10:10:10
lovepeace21uk 1 year ago
What arrogance, ignorance and stupidity this clip is. It is not comedy it is a Marxist attitude to kill anyone who won't go along with the regime. It is sick.
quizerry 1 year ago 2
@quizerry I'm guessing Irony and satire aren't in your vocabulary then.
To not find it funny or be offended by its graphic nature is one thing but to take it literally and actually believe that they condone blowing up people who disagree with them is plain stupidity of the highest order.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 I don't find blowing up school children satire. This clip is repulsive in every way. Nothing about it is amusing. What exactly do you think their message is? To put fear into children?
quizerry 1 year ago 2
@quizerry
"Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted" - Vladimir Lenin
Mal3volution 1 year ago 2
@TheBadgerboy1977
This one's for you, Bud!
"1010 Defender to the Rescue"
orwellsspectre 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977
"to take it literally and actually believe that they condone blowing up people"
Of COURSE not. Explosives are so messy, expensive, and they give off TONNES of CO2.
Mal3volution 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 There is always a degree of truth to every "just kidding" and this is a rare glimpse into the psyche of the propagators of the green movement. the message here is clear:
"You are cattle and your life is of similar consequence, oppose us and be destroyed"
This is not an extreme view in their minds because they are fighting for the very survival of the planet, like a soldier in war, except this time they have declared war on dissenters
Bizzar0Stamos 1 year ago
To every single person who has taken this video literally and believes that the renowned humanist and charity campaigner Richard Curtis et al are eco mentalists who want to blow people up that disagree with them, YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS!!!!!!!!
Just because your simple minds cannot grasp the humour and poignancy prevalent in this excellent slice of genius does not mean its not there, stop taking things literally and on face value and seriously try to engage your brains a bit more.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 : well said!
10:10:10
No Pressure!! x
lovepeace21uk 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 So you don't think it is sort of eco-fascism. And makes the Environmental group look like complete crazies? Sorry the clip is crap.
quizerry 1 year ago
@TheBadgerboy1977 If it's such a slice of genius that us poor mortals should look upon it and be enthralled, why did they have to take it down within minutes? My brain is fully engaged when you imply you will murder my children if they don't comply to your agenda. That is nothing to joke about. If this had only adults being killed, it'd still be stupid, but it wouldn't touch on a very primal instict, defending your young. Doesn't sound like genius to me.
pehpig 1 year ago
@pehpig Unfortunately there's more than enough puritanical busy body's in the world that would happily complain about something they clearly have no understanding of for if they did understand it they would not be taking it at face value and complaining in the first place.
TheBadgerboy1977 1 year ago
Obama's climate czar John Holdren talked about "global disruption" a few weeks ago. Now we knwo what he meant...
breakaleg10 1 year ago
FEAR THE RED BUTTON!
Trelane574 1 year ago 2
Get ready for a 1010 Global name change. They are gonna want rid themselves of this association.
lbsrfr999 1 year ago
thanks for posting this.....im speechless....
rageohol 1 year ago
Hmmmm, islam = submit too...hmmmmm
HereinLasVegas 1 year ago
1010 Global really screwed the pooch on this one. I never heard of them before, now I only know them as "those people who want to blow you up for thinking differently from them". I understand all the actors and techs worked for free. I still think it cost them dearly.
pehpig 1 year ago
@pehpig Exactly. In their lame-ass non-apology apology they say that "many people" thought the film was "extremely funny," but "unfortunately, some did not." Got that? "Hey, most people think it's funny, but a small minority of humorless prigs don't." I wonder how long it's going to take them to realize how much permanent damage they have done to their own cause? Climategate, Copenhagen fiasco, and now this. Stick a fork in it, AGW is finished.
danolson 1 year ago 2
Take note of the reactions of the compliant ones: Sheer horror. The message is as much for them as for those who do not comply. Toe the line, or join the dissenters in bloody destruction. ='[.]'=
Raycheetah 1 year ago
I said it before and I'll say it again, blowing up non-greenies contributes to climate change.
mego73 1 year ago
And we believed you the first time... because since you cannot rationally state a reasonable position "force" is the only argument you have left (and I do mean "left")
kelteckid 1 year ago
@kelteckid If I understand you correctly, you are misunderstanding me, I am not part of this. I was making a sarcastic comment that these greenies are contributing to "climate change" by blowing up non-believers.
mego73 1 year ago
And here is a message for the "environmentalists". Come get me you POS. Let's do it . You want a final battle, come get some. I welcome you to Tennessee. Come on, lets PARTY! Oh, you probably ought to dump the pretty pink imaginary button and pick up some hardware on the way down.
Skywatcher44 1 year ago
@Skywatcher44 Chill, Bunny!
cyryc 1 year ago
@Skywatcher44 Can I join you?..just dont mistake me for one of them when I show up in Tennesee! ;)
rageohol 1 year ago
The original video was damning enough....
tufft1 1 year ago 2
"They will no longer take 'no' for an answer..."
Apparently, they'll just PRETEND to take "no" for an answer, tell you "That's fine, no pressure -- YOUR CHOICE," and then destroy you right in front of your friends and colleagues.
And considering that Islamic terrorists like Osama bin Laden like blowing people up, it does make (sick) sense to quote bin Laden about global warming being the fault of "all of the industrialized countries, especially the big ones" at the end of this video.
aitch748 1 year ago 2
Whenever the totalitarians come out of the closet they have to kill the disbelievers. Otherwise people start to think for themselves, which sows doubt. And doubt is the last thing these demagogues want.
Of course, a number of these "environmentalists" would like that device just to kill off a few billion humans...
TalkingFrog 1 year ago 2
I knew it. Environmentalists are terrorists.
ixaxion 1 year ago 5
I think everyone who cares about the environment should stop eating meat, especially ribeye steaks. That way it will be much cheaper for me. Thanks in advance!
blogegog 1 year ago
@blogegog
I agree. Commies should not eat meat or drink beer.
LibtardsSuck 1 year ago
@blogegog
Except that eliminating enough of the demand will then cause costs to rise because economies of scale (production, distribution, retail) no longer can be used. But I applaud your intention.
TalkingFrog 1 year ago
The enviro movement is the new home of the socialist/communists. An excuse for govt to grab more power.
jimmmmie 1 year ago 6
Awesome remix to show how dangerous these commie "enviro" nutsacks are.
There's no proof of man made global warming, but they continue in their quest to CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIVES AND REDISTRIBUTE YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY TO LAZY LEECHES.
GLOBAL WARMING IS A MASSIVE SCAM ON THE IDIOT MASSES.
LibtardsSuck 1 year ago 6
Great wrap up of what this movement is about.
ZombieAdolph 1 year ago 3