If Britain landlocked with rest of Europe then the Germans would have easily overran us and conquer London within two weeks.
However, it was fortunate that the English Channel protects us. Radars, spitfires and hurricanes, not forgotten the Royal Navy did stop the Nazis from invading Britain.
One Panzer commander was said to have heard saying "It was a excellent tank obstacle" meaning that the Channel stop German tanks from going into Britain.
@TheWiseOldLion read correctly what i wrote! ive never talked about the battle of britain but about the whole war! without a russian front the brits together with the americans would probably not have won if all the effort would have been concentrated on knocking the brits out! until the russian campaign the brits were just able to hold their island, while they had been loosing everywhere else from northern europe to northern africa!
@libra61060 until they get defeated which was many times in many wars..Yanks kicked your butts during Revolutionary war and sent you back to your island with your tails between your legs.Don't come back now or you'll get another whopping!
@libra61060 The fall of Singapore to the Japanese, and the largest surrender of British-led military personnel in history. About 80,000 British, Indian and Australian troops became prisoners of war, joining 50,000 taken by the Japanese in the Malayan Campaign. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill called the ignominious fall of Singapore to the Japanese the "worst disaster" and "largest capitulation" in British history. In just seven days,Singapore, the "Impregnable Fortress",had fallen
Okay, Britain surrenders in 1940, although the RAF won the skies over Britain and beat the German Airforce. Also, how come, in this video, Britain was invaded first then Poland, Even though Britain declared war on Germany after invading Poland?
ok tell me this why did the nazis attack the soviot union and other countreis that did nothing to germans or germant (chekoslovakia,the UK, north africa, france, and hungery) and at stalingrad the murdered thousands of men women and children and churchhill never wanted war he only wanted to help those who need help from the nazi invation because he new the nazis raped and killed killed cavillions were ever they went
@nightwish1000 nt really cause we would have evetually caught up and won it would have been a long and hard fought but in the end britain and the empire would have come out ontop
@CrMyrProductions well, then you know more than winston churchill who knew that britain would have been lost without the americans who supported you already in 1940. however, without a russian front you wouldn't have had a chance, the turning point of the war was in stalingrad, the russians destroyed the german armies and the german air force which lacked in the west afterwards. only due to the desaster in russia a successful norman invasion was possible.
@ScallySkinMaster the support America give us before they joined the war was land lease deals for them to protect merchant shipping, which doesn't count as support really because we paid for it, we paid for pretty much everything. American made ammunition made up less than 1% of of our ammunition. even when America eventually joined the war they didn't have a bigger military presence in western Europe as the British commonwealth.
Britain vs Germany you'd have been slaughtered. Germanys tech advancement was greatest in WW2-Britain developed radar 1st but then Germany got that, stealth, modern uboats, 1st jet fighters, 1st submachine guns, fastest machine guns, best tanks, anti armour, ballistic missiles etc. Germany only lost as they were stretched for men & material, but in a one on one war with all that to focus on one enemy they'd have annhiliated you. Dont kid yourself.
@nightwish1000 nt really cause we would have evetually caught up and won it would have been a long and hard fought but in the end britain and the empire would have come out ontop
If it makes anyone here feel better, allow me to enlighten. Even if the RAF had been defeated (unlikely, please see battle field detectives), the Royal Navy could stop any cross channel invasion. The German Airforce had no armour piercing bombs in 1940 and no torpedo bombers. After Norway, the German Navy only had 1 cruiser and 6 destroyers to guard Rhine river barges across the channel.
It is not "a load of bollocks". We all know it didn't happen, thanks God. Yet, until late in 1940, it was a possible option of History, which was seriously considered by many people throughout the world:
- Had Churchill been killed in a bombing, peace-seeking politicians could have been elected, supported by pacifist or pro-German parts of the opinion.
- Had the German military accepted to take more risks, they would have organized an invasion with what ships and airborne troops they had.
Wtf lol, Is this alternate History or something
Lockstock97 1 week ago
@Lockstock97 yes
bfFAN221 1 week ago
Fact remains, an amazing fight to the death the Brits win again.
UK US support each other..derrrrrrrrrrrr.
It never ends, Iran's next.
Box clever!
libra61060 3 weeks ago
If Britain landlocked with rest of Europe then the Germans would have easily overran us and conquer London within two weeks.
However, it was fortunate that the English Channel protects us. Radars, spitfires and hurricanes, not forgotten the Royal Navy did stop the Nazis from invading Britain.
One Panzer commander was said to have heard saying "It was a excellent tank obstacle" meaning that the Channel stop German tanks from going into Britain.
DavBlc7 9 months ago
britain nvr surrenders! this is fake! -.-"
burtmurdoch 1 year ago
@burtmurdoch surrendered 80,000 in singapore
fezzorama 3 weeks ago
The sun never sets on my ASSHOLE!!!
RaptureandZune 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RaptureandZune You mean the Sun never sets on 3rd world countries which the British seized by force against natives and spears.Imperialist bastards!
fezzorama 3 weeks ago
@TheWiseOldLion read correctly what i wrote! ive never talked about the battle of britain but about the whole war! without a russian front the brits together with the americans would probably not have won if all the effort would have been concentrated on knocking the brits out! until the russian campaign the brits were just able to hold their island, while they had been loosing everywhere else from northern europe to northern africa!
nightwish1000 1 year ago
It should have done real
HeiligesReich2 1 year ago
Britian- Undefeatable !
libra61060 2 years ago 5
@libra61060
Lol try putting yourselves in Germanys shoes in WW2-British Empire vs German Reich, USA, Soviet Union etc, you'd be pounded to dust in a week.
gunninlinguist 3 months ago
@gunninlinguist Britian would never get into a position where it faced
3rd reich USA, Soviet Union,
THINK!
libra61060 3 months ago
@libra61060 until they get defeated which was many times in many wars..Yanks kicked your butts during Revolutionary war and sent you back to your island with your tails between your legs.Don't come back now or you'll get another whopping!
fezzorama 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@libra61060 The fall of Singapore to the Japanese, and the largest surrender of British-led military personnel in history. About 80,000 British, Indian and Australian troops became prisoners of war, joining 50,000 taken by the Japanese in the Malayan Campaign. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill called the ignominious fall of Singapore to the Japanese the "worst disaster" and "largest capitulation" in British history. In just seven days,Singapore, the "Impregnable Fortress",had fallen
fezzorama 3 weeks ago
Okay, Britain surrenders in 1940, although the RAF won the skies over Britain and beat the German Airforce. Also, how come, in this video, Britain was invaded first then Poland, Even though Britain declared war on Germany after invading Poland?
2k8FARNHILL2k8 2 years ago
it was a big reich!!
GerHeinrich 2 years ago 4
ok tell me this why did the nazis attack the soviot union and other countreis that did nothing to germans or germant (chekoslovakia,the UK, north africa, france, and hungery) and at stalingrad the murdered thousands of men women and children and churchhill never wanted war he only wanted to help those who need help from the nazi invation because he new the nazis raped and killed killed cavillions were ever they went
gosaints1234568 3 years ago
realy then why did they invade poland first fuck u nazi
gosaints1234568 3 years ago
With it's airforce destroyed britain would have been finished
if britain surrendered germany might have won the war
HannibalY2k 3 years ago 2
it may be clear that a war germany against britain (On its own) would have been won by germany...
nightwish1000 3 years ago
@nightwish1000 nt really cause we would have evetually caught up and won it would have been a long and hard fought but in the end britain and the empire would have come out ontop
CrMyrProductions 1 year ago
@CrMyrProductions well, then you know more than winston churchill who knew that britain would have been lost without the americans who supported you already in 1940. however, without a russian front you wouldn't have had a chance, the turning point of the war was in stalingrad, the russians destroyed the german armies and the german air force which lacked in the west afterwards. only due to the desaster in russia a successful norman invasion was possible.
ScallySkinMaster 1 year ago
@ScallySkinMaster sorry about this, I wasn't aware that my friend was pointlessly starting discussions on my account
CrMyrProductions 1 year ago
@ScallySkinMaster the support America give us before they joined the war was land lease deals for them to protect merchant shipping, which doesn't count as support really because we paid for it, we paid for pretty much everything. American made ammunition made up less than 1% of of our ammunition. even when America eventually joined the war they didn't have a bigger military presence in western Europe as the British commonwealth.
HailToTheSkunk 1 year ago
@CrMyrProductions
Britain vs Germany you'd have been slaughtered. Germanys tech advancement was greatest in WW2-Britain developed radar 1st but then Germany got that, stealth, modern uboats, 1st jet fighters, 1st submachine guns, fastest machine guns, best tanks, anti armour, ballistic missiles etc. Germany only lost as they were stretched for men & material, but in a one on one war with all that to focus on one enemy they'd have annhiliated you. Dont kid yourself.
gunninlinguist 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nightwish1000 nt really cause we would have evetually caught up and won it would have been a long and hard fought but in the end britain and the empire would have come out ontop
CrMyrProductions 1 year ago
wtf we were winning in north africa at the time and then up through italy
fkinbrillant 3 years ago
If it makes anyone here feel better, allow me to enlighten. Even if the RAF had been defeated (unlikely, please see battle field detectives), the Royal Navy could stop any cross channel invasion. The German Airforce had no armour piercing bombs in 1940 and no torpedo bombers. After Norway, the German Navy only had 1 cruiser and 6 destroyers to guard Rhine river barges across the channel.
willconq 3 years ago
It is not "a load of bollocks". We all know it didn't happen, thanks God. Yet, until late in 1940, it was a possible option of History, which was seriously considered by many people throughout the world:
- Had Churchill been killed in a bombing, peace-seeking politicians could have been elected, supported by pacifist or pro-German parts of the opinion.
- Had the German military accepted to take more risks, they would have organized an invasion with what ships and airborne troops they had.
Fridomfry 3 years ago
marianjeromin (1 month ago) Show Hide -1 Marked as spam Reply | Spam Without the polish airforce, britain had lost the war.
POLSKA!!!/........
WHAT A JOKE, ARE YOU SERIOUS. MORE LIKE WITHOUT THE SOVIET UNION POLAND AND POLISH PEOPLE WOULDNT EXIST.
3lectric15 4 years ago
"Britain never never never shall be slaves"
Great Britain won, Fascism lost.
danny88101 4 years ago