wow - he keeps referring to expenditure figures as if their gospel and unbiased. THEY ARE THEIR ROSE-TINTED FIGURES, DETACHED FROM REALITY!
plus the speaker was just as dithering as Brown. Glad he went, not so glad he got a weight in gold to do it... I suspect that the same will be done for Labour once they leave - taxpayers treasure stuffed into their pockets...
Fuck you Labour. I have been ill with a brain tumour for 10 months. I still don't get benefits. Hoop after hoop I have to jump through. They know everything about me except the length of my dick. I think it would be best to hit a politician over the head and let the state care for me in prison. CUNTS of note this lot.Medical assessments, questionaires like novel thickness, bank statements for 3 months,payslips for 3 months, proof of this and that and this and that but still no MOOLAH!
Lets be fair, many business people earn more than MPs when they have very little power. Pay MPs more and get higher quality people, the reason this is happening is MPs are not paid well for what they do and the expenses are there to reflect that. Lets be open and pay what is required and ban all expenses. Easy. Remember we elect them to run the country and remuneration HAS to reflect that premis. They are not office or blue collar workers. Make it open and move on
because macmillan introduced a lower salary, but they could claim expenses to pad it out, and succesive goverments have never had the balls to scrap the expense system and just give the mp's a better wage inline with doctors and headteachers.
Travel and Second homes for MP's whos constituants are a large distance from London.
Buit that system has been abused, in my opinion MP's should have a block of flats in London to stay while their, it would be a good investment. The only problem would be stories which eminate from it:P
How bizarre that they're arguing about who's going to spend more money. Why not just say "yes, we're going to cut spending because we want to cut the deficit"
because labour always say that when you cut public spending, doctors, nurses teacher (front line staff) will lose their jobs. they don't realise that you can cut spending and you wouldn't notice it when you are at school or in the hospital. or by sacking thousands or useless wanker beaurocrats or aaxing quangos.
socialism is like heroin, very addictive and hard to stop. also the fact that the more people on the goverment payroll, the more people who will vot for you to save their job. there are thousands of non-jobs like outreach officers and diversity executives. all have excelent wages and very good pensions and utter waste of money!
Where the fuck is Ed Miliband in there?
DrunkRussian2 1 month ago in playlist More videos from liarpoliticians
ur username says it all
TheBashed9 1 year ago
Went we eat the last fish in the see we will find out what we cant eat money.
dermot2222 1 year ago
love ur user name!
richardcadbury 1 year ago
wow - he keeps referring to expenditure figures as if their gospel and unbiased. THEY ARE THEIR ROSE-TINTED FIGURES, DETACHED FROM REALITY!
plus the speaker was just as dithering as Brown. Glad he went, not so glad he got a weight in gold to do it... I suspect that the same will be done for Labour once they leave - taxpayers treasure stuffed into their pockets...
PriestOfFilm 2 years ago
Screw labour and their dumb ass socialist, control freak ethos.
JustAnotherGuy186 2 years ago
Fuck you Labour. I have been ill with a brain tumour for 10 months. I still don't get benefits. Hoop after hoop I have to jump through. They know everything about me except the length of my dick. I think it would be best to hit a politician over the head and let the state care for me in prison. CUNTS of note this lot.Medical assessments, questionaires like novel thickness, bank statements for 3 months,payslips for 3 months, proof of this and that and this and that but still no MOOLAH!
karuspery 2 years ago 5
GORDON BROWN'S dickhead Marxist government FAILED to sort ANY of the problems out in TWELVE YEARS of misrule! Why bother to start now?!
Paste the below title into the bar for another angle on New Labour shambles in Britain today:
NEW LABOUR RUINS THE LEFTIST POT PARTY
(Gold-dumping, one-eyed, splurge-encouraging Scots arsehole!)
TheDustpile 2 years ago 5
The sooner we are rid of this useless Labour government, the better. They've been disaster over the last 12 years.
Paulph04 2 years ago 4
Lets be fair, many business people earn more than MPs when they have very little power. Pay MPs more and get higher quality people, the reason this is happening is MPs are not paid well for what they do and the expenses are there to reflect that. Lets be open and pay what is required and ban all expenses. Easy. Remember we elect them to run the country and remuneration HAS to reflect that premis. They are not office or blue collar workers. Make it open and move on
englishboy78 2 years ago 2
Most of the guys who are MP's are either on the board or own companies!!!
TheTeamtopshelf 2 years ago
what i don't get is why MPs need expenses?
rayza71 2 years ago 4
think of it as extra dole payments for politicians.
Why do people on council estates use benefit fraud to get even more money for themselves as they can't be arsed to get a proper job?
Same answer with this lot!
AidanLunn 2 years ago 2
because macmillan introduced a lower salary, but they could claim expenses to pad it out, and succesive goverments have never had the balls to scrap the expense system and just give the mp's a better wage inline with doctors and headteachers.
mbb05jb 2 years ago
MP expenses originally had two purposes
Travel and Second homes for MP's whos constituants are a large distance from London.
Buit that system has been abused, in my opinion MP's should have a block of flats in London to stay while their, it would be a good investment. The only problem would be stories which eminate from it:P
Erech01 2 years ago
How bizarre that they're arguing about who's going to spend more money. Why not just say "yes, we're going to cut spending because we want to cut the deficit"
anon2999 2 years ago 2
because labour always say that when you cut public spending, doctors, nurses teacher (front line staff) will lose their jobs. they don't realise that you can cut spending and you wouldn't notice it when you are at school or in the hospital. or by sacking thousands or useless wanker beaurocrats or aaxing quangos.
mbb05jb 2 years ago 3
Similar to the scare tactics they use here I guess.
"You better vote for this new tax or we're going to fire teachers and cancel sports programs" As if that's all their budget consists of.
anon2999 2 years ago 2
socialism is like heroin, very addictive and hard to stop. also the fact that the more people on the goverment payroll, the more people who will vot for you to save their job. there are thousands of non-jobs like outreach officers and diversity executives. all have excelent wages and very good pensions and utter waste of money!
mbb05jb 2 years ago 3