IMHO, the best analog polysynth ever made. Blows the Memorymoog away anyday! Just wish it'd been a little more road worthy. Don't know which spent more time in repair, the OBX, or the PPG Wave 2.2. Two of my all-time faves, tho. Together, they were killer.
I love the pads this keyboard produces. Very spaced out, makes me feel like Im gliding inbetween dimensions. I have a moog prodigy, and I love it to death! but I only wish it was polyphonic.
If only I could carry over the moog filters and oscillator to a pad synth like this..
I love these Space Sweeps. What better instrument is there to express our wonderment at the distant, complex, and ever unreachable outer space. Great video!
Software synths may duplicate the sound to a level where it is completely indistinguishable, but there's still something about hardware that just doesn't translate into software. Personally I might be unable to tell between the real thing and software, but knowing there's a real synth playing somewhere is always a nice feeling. :)
This demo shows why the real analog synthesizer keep their value. No software emulation can can quite obtain that warmth and smoothness. The OB-X is clearly one of the best sounding analogs around!
Noch besser passend ist aus dem Album "Traum von Asgard" der Titel "Orakel". Von Kritikern verrissen, das zweite Elektronik-Album- aber klasse Platte ;)
I almost forgot about Carl Sagan. The OB filter is rather nice. I could listen to this over and over, and then later see what I could do with my own digital and analog synths.
Regarding analog vs digital, I think analogs are like a Rolls Royce in cars: maybe not too versatile, but the feeling of using (and hearing) them is a pleasure you can't get with a digital one.
The analog random detune variations still can't be exactly emulated by any virtual analog :)
Nice, very Giorgio Moroder-esque, In fact it sounds like music from Cat People. That is a good thing by the way...I love that music and you do it very well here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you're being ignorant because you assume that simply because i posted a comment asking a simple question you assume that i am trying to insult all analog synths. i dont have anything against analog synths, if i did i wouldn't subscribe to this channel. i am simply of the opinion that they are outdated and not practical in a modern environment.
your use of the "pot & kettle" analogy is totally out of place and only further exemplifies your stupidity.
ahhh, your true colours have fully blossomed. nothing like further exemplification of your idiocy for me to laugh at. such a lovely character you are.
PsychedelicVideos Quote: "i dont have anything against analog synths, i am simply of the opinion that they are outdated and not practical in a modern environment"
I'm guessing you've never owned a real analog instrument, otherwise you wouldn't of made such an ignorant statement.
One person asks: "What can this synth do that a software replica of it ......can't?"
Umm....
.anything AND everything !!!
Real-time tactile control of each parameter. You cannot replicate the "feel" of an analog synth, just as an virtual "hot girlfriend" won't ever replace the real thing !!!
Having owned an OB-X, an Oberheim 2-Voice, a Prophet 5, Minimoogs, a Micromoog, Hammond C3, etc.---there is no substitute !!! You can get similar sounds, but it isn't the same. Great stuff. Peace:-)
Genial! Die alten Oberheim Filter klingen einfach genial! Schade eigentlich. Ich dachte ich hätte gerade einen schönen, warmen Pad mit dem UHE Zebra Softsynth geschraubt ^^
This is certainly a very space age sound, I can see this being used in a space travel movie. When was this synth made? It's got a really nice warm deep sound to it.
first of all, stop assuming im trying to make a negative comment about analog synths. your "ha!" comment is clearly an attempt to make me feel stupid or bad in some way for asking a perfectly legitimate question.
second of all, what is "CV" and is there a digital equivalent?
third, could the average listener tell the difference between CV and its digital equivalent? (assuming there is one)
CV is Control Voltage. You could describe it as the analogue precursor to MIDI although it can't do quite as much as MIDI and works in a completely different way.
of course, but 97% of people wont be able to tell the difference. a 3% margin isn't worth blowing thousands of dollars on just to collect outdated technology that can be replicated with a small margin of error for free.
perhaps to you (a synth aficionado) but to 97% of listeners that doesn't mean anything.
if you're trying to make music for that 3% good for you, but in my opinion investing so much money to please so few people doesn't make sense. but you can do whatever you want, have fun.
@PsychedelicVideos Who sent you?? First you ask a dumb ass question, then respond with your own answer. If you played a Minimoog & then a VST emulation, 99% of people WOULD be able to tell the difference in sound. Since you don't own one wtf do you know?!
This is a hobby, there are people who spend more than this on useless stamp or coin collection, and other completely utterly useless things. who are you to tell him whats "worth it" or not? it's his money and obviously he feels it's worth it.
stop being such an ignorant twat. just because someone post something that is contrary to popular opinion does not mean they are trying to start shit.
i completely get where you're coming from, i still prefer to use film & my darkroom over digital photography.
all im saying is that for commercial recording purposes i think it makes much more sense for an artist to spend as little money on equipment as possible when there are alternatives that can do practically the same thing.
I agree with you, and I've played analog synths before and even though I tried telling myself they sound different, DSP technology today is advanced enough for softsynths to sound just as good.
The cool thing about analog synths is that there's a feeling of the system being unstable, like you can feel the "electrical-ness" of the sound, with no quantization or error correction involved. I can't really explain it properly.
@DJPeteJames I think the sound ist not the same (other components) but with the typical oberheim sound character
retrosound72 4 months ago
sounds great except for the annoying rythym......
dondorward2010 4 months ago
You could always dload one of these, but it is not like the real thig... But you WILL publish your record on CD, right ? :P
psionicxxx 5 months ago
Love the Oberheim sound.
MaynoDolphin 9 months ago
VCO's for life!!!
LaugermanPROductions 10 months ago
IMHO, the best analog polysynth ever made. Blows the Memorymoog away anyday! Just wish it'd been a little more road worthy. Don't know which spent more time in repair, the OBX, or the PPG Wave 2.2. Two of my all-time faves, tho. Together, they were killer.
4everColReb 1 year ago 3
@4everColReb
absolute agree with you :))
retrosound72 1 year ago
I see, and i hear - this is Great instrument ,marvellous space sounds
TheSolAlex 1 year ago
@TheSolAlex
:))
retrosound72 1 year ago
where can i buy one of these from?
flyyourkite95 1 year ago
@flyyourkite95
this is not easy. the OB-X is very rare.
retrosound72 1 year ago
@flyyourkite95 maybe eddie van halen will sell you his
rockymountainsunrise 1 year ago
I love the pads this keyboard produces. Very spaced out, makes me feel like Im gliding inbetween dimensions. I have a moog prodigy, and I love it to death! but I only wish it was polyphonic.
If only I could carry over the moog filters and oscillator to a pad synth like this..
jimihendrix121 1 year ago
very trippy
LittleNegrillio 1 year ago
Which synth do you think is the best for this kind of sounds?
Is there any cheaper machine that's good enough at this?
arzani86 1 year ago
@arzani86
the OB Matrix 6/1000 synths are great and cheap
retrosound72 1 year ago
@DJPeteJames
only a bit delay (Lexicon MPX)
retrosound72 1 year ago
ok retrosound,thanks
Neuronaluniverse 1 year ago
Great synthesizer of coarse....do you know Neuron? Everybody who love sintes has to hear it. you can see it on Youtube neuronaluniverse.
Neuronaluniverse 1 year ago
@Neuronaluniverse
Sure I know the Neuron. Great Synth!
retrosound72 1 year ago
analog sound forever! digital sound sucks. nice OB-X :D
Grounditzelf 1 year ago
I love these Space Sweeps. What better instrument is there to express our wonderment at the distant, complex, and ever unreachable outer space. Great video!
culturaleyes 1 year ago
Oberhiems had a unique sound all their own.
rtsinister 1 year ago
Software synths may duplicate the sound to a level where it is completely indistinguishable, but there's still something about hardware that just doesn't translate into software. Personally I might be unable to tell between the real thing and software, but knowing there's a real synth playing somewhere is always a nice feeling. :)
ODMSys 1 year ago
i could listen to these synths over and over.the sound is just amazing.your lucky to own one.
yoyo0072 1 year ago
@yoyo0072
thank you
retrosound72 1 year ago
1984
georgemg55 1 year ago
There are no words to describe that sound. This may well be the greatyest synth of the all.
userjoe1020 1 year ago
@userjoe1020
thx :)
retrosound72 1 year ago
Nice Sound
musictec1 1 year ago 2
This demo shows why the real analog synthesizer keep their value. No software emulation can can quite obtain that warmth and smoothness. The OB-X is clearly one of the best sounding analogs around!
MacXpert74 2 years ago 14
absolute agree!
retrosound72 2 years ago
@retrosound72 i feel the same way but roland is getting close with the fantom g
though
Denvermorgan2000 1 year ago
\m/ respect+agree!!
theHackerOfMayhem 1 year ago
@MacXpert74 Couldn't agree more!
TheInnocentSynth 11 months ago
Very sweet, but I think you had the OB-X tuned down 2 whole steps from E to C. :P
eddievhfan1984 2 years ago
Great demo Marko
magevers 2 years ago 2
thanks a lot Marc :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Just awesome
:-)
BenedictRoffMarsh 2 years ago
thank you :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
superb synth marco, also sounds very john carpenter, filter sweeps are so common on most modern synths but none sound like that, beautiful:)
mik300z 2 years ago 9
:)
thank you Mick
retrosound72 2 years ago
@mik300z Couldn't agree more!
TheInnocentSynth 11 months ago
Superb instrument!
freddy279 2 years ago 3
hey retrosound turn on your favourites from your channel, I want to see something please.
MisfioPeton 2 years ago
the OB-X is very, very rare and functional synths in good condition cost 3500-4000 $
the M-1000 is also nice but very different to the OB-X , more similar to the Xpander but less the VCO`s
I think the M-1000 is very underrated
retrosound72 2 years ago
Wow deine Maschinen klingen einfach alle nur....
... mir fehlen die Worte dafür! Tolle Demo wie immer Marko. :)
Grüsse.
MrSkywalker1000 2 years ago 3
:)
Ich danke dir.
retrosound72 2 years ago
i have an OB-Xa. it's sounds very much alike in depth and tone - but the OB-X has more 'air' in the high freqs and is a touch phatter.
shaft9000 2 years ago 2
both synths OB-X and OB-Xa are fantastic
really like the classic Oberheim sound
retrosound72 2 years ago
thank you :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
nice
sambamamba2000 2 years ago
Very nice sounds *****
asalux 2 years ago 2
thanks
retrosound72 2 years ago
Beautiful, as always. Your posts always make my day!
randomeddie 2 years ago 2
thanks a lot eddie
retrosound72 2 years ago
sweet sound, wish i could afford an analog
InstrumentalMania 2 years ago
Klasse Wechsel, Marko, sehr inspirierend und das Ganze mit sanften SEM-Filtersweeps. Ich liebe den Sound.
Kennst du "Zeiten" von Lakomy&Oleak? Der trockene Beat in Kombination mit den Sweeps erinnert mich sehr an die Platte.
sternrekorder 2 years ago 2
Ich danke dir.
"Zeiten" kenne ich nicht, muss ich mal reinhören.
schönen Sonntag noch
retrosound72 2 years ago
@retrosound72
Noch besser passend ist aus dem Album "Traum von Asgard" der Titel "Orakel". Von Kritikern verrissen, das zweite Elektronik-Album- aber klasse Platte ;)
sternrekorder 2 years ago
nice, this launches me straight to the cosmos
pythonflying 2 years ago 3
thanks
retrosound72 2 years ago
I almost forgot about Carl Sagan. The OB filter is rather nice. I could listen to this over and over, and then later see what I could do with my own digital and analog synths.
kennykeyboard 2 years ago
thanks :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
im a big fan of carl sagan this this nice and so this lovely sounds you are playing marko..10out 5.....:)
soundmanhaven1 2 years ago
thanks a lot :)
great
retrosound72 2 years ago
Did you tune the synth down?
You are pressing "E" yet "C" is playing.
Gregsynth 2 years ago
no,
a fault in video editing
retrosound72 2 years ago
OK! Sounds good though (Cause it's an Oberheim)!
Gregsynth 2 years ago
This is exactly why i want a synthesiser.
matty406 2 years ago 3
Its interresting that it doesn't sound like prophet5 or the jupiter8. The filter is really unique. Great harmonies tio.
FredF78 2 years ago 3
yes the sound is different to the curtis chip based polysynths
retrosound72 2 years ago
Excellent job as always, Marko. With every video you take, I am longing for an analog synth a little more.
Five stars on this video.
TeamNES1 2 years ago 3
thx a lot :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
@retrosound72 No problem. Keep programming those synths for me and all of the world's other synth fans to enjoy. ;-)
TeamNES1 2 years ago
That synthesizer has AMAZING filters!!!!!! they rock me to Jupiter and back!
KaslarProductions 2 years ago
:)
thanks for watching
retrosound72 2 years ago
love it marko...keep em comin sir :)
Twilight1964 2 years ago 2
:)
thx a lot
retrosound72 2 years ago
Excellent stuff;a tiny bit of reverb on the percussion,and you will have nailed that Cosmos vibe[best show ever btw]
Tetramastbad 2 years ago
thanks :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Fantastic sound. I love the filters specially.
Regarding analog vs digital, I think analogs are like a Rolls Royce in cars: maybe not too versatile, but the feeling of using (and hearing) them is a pleasure you can't get with a digital one.
The analog random detune variations still can't be exactly emulated by any virtual analog :)
DX5 2 years ago
absolute agree with you
thank you
your new vid is great!
retrosound72 2 years ago
New favourite synthesizer i see :)
tekkentool 2 years ago
yes indeed :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Beautiful as always Marko...
Cheers
RRKS69 2 years ago
thank you :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Love the tone of this MONSTER synth!!! I need a true analog in my life,.. i only have an Emu Emax I.
MPCpadBanga 2 years ago
The kind of futuristic tones found on Rush' "Permanent Waves" album.
WillHear432 2 years ago
Just a single note on this machine and it sounds like a big big big deal. Its fantastic
Kaidoscope 2 years ago
yes a single sound, no layer, no eq, no overdubbing-
only the pure synth power
thx
retrosound72 2 years ago
No comment! Simply 5 stars! ******!
massia68 2 years ago
;)
thx a lot
retrosound72 2 years ago
und wiedermal sitze ich sabbernd vor meinem pc
schmittwilli 2 years ago 2
du das ging mir früher auch immer so ;)
danke für`s reinschauen
retrosound72 2 years ago
Sounds like John Carpenter to me...
hafstrat 2 years ago
this is high school, this is series A
1soulblues 2 years ago
thx :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
da bekomm ich direkt lust mein behringer anzuschliessen und garageband zu qaeulen^^
wie immer jutes video
redeyesinc 2 years ago
mach doch! :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Was für ein voller Sound! Klasse! :)
OriginalBBQMaster 2 years ago 2
:)
danke
retrosound72 2 years ago
Boah, der gute Oberheim, schon sehr Gehör schmeichelnd die Filter.......aber soooo musikalisch. Tolles Video, Marko.
Mach uns mal allen den Mund wässrig...lol.
Nein, toll das du solche Videos machst.
5 *
Robin :o)
RobinStrower 2 years ago
danke robin :)
ich weiß, sowas ist gemein.
retrosound72 2 years ago
Nice, very Giorgio Moroder-esque, In fact it sounds like music from Cat People. That is a good thing by the way...I love that music and you do it very well here.
Whitelitr 2 years ago
thank you
retrosound72 2 years ago
@PsychedelicVideos how am i being ignorant?? pot calling the kettle black? Funny how you delete your stupid ass comments, to make me look bad. haha
MPCpadBanga 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you're being ignorant because you assume that simply because i posted a comment asking a simple question you assume that i am trying to insult all analog synths. i dont have anything against analog synths, if i did i wouldn't subscribe to this channel. i am simply of the opinion that they are outdated and not practical in a modern environment.
your use of the "pot & kettle" analogy is totally out of place and only further exemplifies your stupidity.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
Comment removed
MPCpadBanga 2 years ago
ahhh, your true colours have fully blossomed. nothing like further exemplification of your idiocy for me to laugh at. such a lovely character you are.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
Comment removed
MPCpadBanga 2 years ago
the fact that you think looking up things in the dictionary is bad is only further testament to my earlier claims regarding your lack of sense.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
PsychedelicVideos Quote: "i dont have anything against analog synths, i am simply of the opinion that they are outdated and not practical in a modern environment"
I'm guessing you've never owned a real analog instrument, otherwise you wouldn't of made such an ignorant statement.
Subtronik 2 years ago 2
i own a grand, and baby grand piano. along with 3 guitars an electric bass and a set of Technics SL-1200 turntables.
doesn't get much more analog than that.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
Then why would you say something so dumb about any analog gear? Head up ass syndrome?
Subtronik 2 years ago 2
lol you're cool bro.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
Ganz einfach wieder mal sehr schööön!
Systemrauschen 2 years ago 3
Ich danke dir :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Jetzt noch eine Elka Synthex demo und ich bin glücklich :)
MarcS4R 2 years ago 3
:)
geht leider nicht, zwecks Nichtvorhandensein eines Synthex ;)
retrosound72 2 years ago
One person asks: "What can this synth do that a software replica of it ......can't?"
Umm....
.anything AND everything !!!
Real-time tactile control of each parameter. You cannot replicate the "feel" of an analog synth, just as an virtual "hot girlfriend" won't ever replace the real thing !!!
Having owned an OB-X, an Oberheim 2-Voice, a Prophet 5, Minimoogs, a Micromoog, Hammond C3, etc.---there is no substitute !!! You can get similar sounds, but it isn't the same. Great stuff. Peace:-)
binnyman 2 years ago 9
:)
You understand!
thank you
retrosound72 2 years ago
John 14:2
our future homes?
umajunkcollector 2 years ago
Fantastic demonstration of this first class instrument.
5***** ; )
ChemicalComedown 2 years ago 2
thank you :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
Obies have such fat pads mmmmmmmmmm nice.
mesmoland 2 years ago 3
Ich lerne viel über die Geräte von dir, Danke Herr RetroSound72!
unknowntomillions 2 years ago 3
Das freut mich :)
danke
retrosound72 2 years ago
epic
SoundInterfaceDriver 2 years ago
Genial! Die alten Oberheim Filter klingen einfach genial! Schade eigentlich. Ich dachte ich hätte gerade einen schönen, warmen Pad mit dem UHE Zebra Softsynth geschraubt ^^
BrontoScorpioMusic 2 years ago 2
Hast du bestimmt auch. UHE Zebra ist doch geil.
Die schönsten Flächen kommen aus meinem JD-800, finde ich jedenfalls. Und der ist auch digital.
Der Filterklang der alten Oberheimis ist schon unbeschreiblich wohlklingend.
retrosound72 2 years ago
This is certainly a very space age sound, I can see this being used in a space travel movie. When was this synth made? It's got a really nice warm deep sound to it.
Lachlant1984 2 years ago 3
1979-1980, only 800-1000 are made
the OB-X is the link between the SEM and the OB-Xa
retrosound72 2 years ago
Really great, reminds me of Jon Hallur's soundtrack to Eve Online.
metabog 2 years ago
thanks
retrosound72 2 years ago
extraordinary tool, thanks very nice!!
NELLOARA 2 years ago
thank you
retrosound72 2 years ago
Inspiring....)
picturemusic75 2 years ago 3
thx :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
what can this synth do that a software replica of it being controlled via MIDI can't?
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
@PsychedelicVideos
Connect by CV! Ha!
4darin5 2 years ago
first of all, stop assuming im trying to make a negative comment about analog synths. your "ha!" comment is clearly an attempt to make me feel stupid or bad in some way for asking a perfectly legitimate question.
second of all, what is "CV" and is there a digital equivalent?
third, could the average listener tell the difference between CV and its digital equivalent? (assuming there is one)
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
CV is Control Voltage. You could describe it as the analogue precursor to MIDI although it can't do quite as much as MIDI and works in a completely different way.
weegerri1sm 2 years ago
you can install the encore midi kit
retrosound72 2 years ago
It's a real analog synth, it's impossible to model/emulate real analog synth perfectly with any piece of software.
gemis94 2 years ago 2
of course, but 97% of people wont be able to tell the difference. a 3% margin isn't worth blowing thousands of dollars on just to collect outdated technology that can be replicated with a small margin of error for free.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
believe me the difference is enormous :)
retrosound72 2 years ago
perhaps to you (a synth aficionado) but to 97% of listeners that doesn't mean anything.
if you're trying to make music for that 3% good for you, but in my opinion investing so much money to please so few people doesn't make sense. but you can do whatever you want, have fun.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
@PsychedelicVideos Who sent you?? First you ask a dumb ass question, then respond with your own answer. If you played a Minimoog & then a VST emulation, 99% of people WOULD be able to tell the difference in sound. Since you don't own one wtf do you know?!
This is a hobby, there are people who spend more than this on useless stamp or coin collection, and other completely utterly useless things. who are you to tell him whats "worth it" or not? it's his money and obviously he feels it's worth it.
MPCpadBanga 2 years ago 2
stop being such an ignorant twat. just because someone post something that is contrary to popular opinion does not mean they are trying to start shit.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
It is the complete package, not only the unique sound, the feeling, the knobs, the history , the soul of a real analog synth.
It gives very good software today. I am however from the old iron and I love this old gear.
Why do all love a Jaguar E-Type?
Not because of engine power or security.
Its fun!
retrosound72 2 years ago
i completely get where you're coming from, i still prefer to use film & my darkroom over digital photography.
all im saying is that for commercial recording purposes i think it makes much more sense for an artist to spend as little money on equipment as possible when there are alternatives that can do practically the same thing.
PsychedelicVideos 2 years ago
I agree with you, and I've played analog synths before and even though I tried telling myself they sound different, DSP technology today is advanced enough for softsynths to sound just as good.
The cool thing about analog synths is that there's a feeling of the system being unstable, like you can feel the "electrical-ness" of the sound, with no quantization or error correction involved. I can't really explain it properly.
It's a hobby, don't criticize it.
metabog 2 years ago