I hate what they are doing with Wade Barret his feuds are very very predictable. First he trash talk him in one night then other time he interfere at a match then finally before the PPV you have stare down and walk away . The exact same pattern with different opponent nothing is being done with him that is different or creative . Such a wasted talent . WAKE UP WWE!
@sneak2attack The feuds are booked generally right, they have done different things with the feud, you could say all feuds are like that, but WWE are doing it right, the right formula can sometimes be predictable but can still be effective... I don't think for one minute he is a wasted talent or something different needs to be done with him creatively... They are doing it simply and effectively
I think Wade could benefit from feuding with Taker even if he lost, it is all about he is booked and how good is the storyline.
You can win all prizes Royal rumble, WWE championship, main even Wrestle Mania, money in the bank and people will still no take you seriously. A good example would be ADR and the Miz. I believe it is not about what you achieved the same would applied to breaking the streak.
@sneak2attack He definitely would benefit from a feud with Taker, I just don't think WWE have got him anywhere near Takers level yet, maybe they could have him feud with Taker at Summerslam and win or something, protect the streak that way. Well making a guy win RR and main eventing WM is a good way to get people to take them seriously, it was just how they followed it up and how he was booked that hurt Del Rio
If you were in charge you missed something important divas bikini contest,bra and panty matches and just dressing sexier I mean even if a bra and panty match sucked it had a pay off
The TV title is a massive joke. I think the pope would be the perfect for that championship to make it into a bigger midcard title. WWE is pg yet their demographic is 77% adults and the kids go to sleep during their 1 hour main event so if that 77% goes down then their screwed. If i could control wwe for a day i would destroy FCW and send all thr talent to OVW and destroy wwe films with a bulldozer :) For my question if you guys could control ROH for a day what would you change?
@mikej690 The TV title could be used so well but TNA made it into a joke for some unknown reason, it should be a mid-card title similar to the IC belt and whatnot... WWE are trying to appeal their product to 23% demographic, which is just downright bad business full stop... FCW is a pretty good product, but they haven't made that many stars, credit that to JR back in OVW days, its more Johnny Ace's (and therefor Vince's) fault than anything... Good question, I'll add that to the list
@WWEDaniel01 yes you look at crimson or matt morgan and see 2 guys that shouldn't be in the world title picture just yet but their a tag team now and sooner or later they will make them feud why not let the tv title be apart of their feud. FCW is good but alot of people that were called up from FCW like darren young curt hawkings, hell many of them have been fired or arent doing anything. the thing about the tag teams in both wwe and TNA need alot of work like getting the usos over or something
@mikej690 Well Morgan could be, but Crimson needs more work, I think he will better as a heel personally, which is why I look forward to those 2 feuding at some point (which I'm sure is the whole point of putting them together in the first place)... FCW doesn't produce the best talents, but they have some good ones in there at the moment, its just how WWE chooses to spotlight them which will be important
@WWEDaniel01 I agree Crimson doesn't look like a good guy he looks like a badass that have poential to be a good heel. wwe should do just like their doing now and thats not to call anyone up untill wwe creative (who are full of people who shouldn't be in the business like stephine ) comes up with a storyline for them
@mikej690 Crimson should work better as a heel... I do want WWE to stick with only using an FCW guy (like they did Del Rio) if they have something really strong planned for them
I Descoverd WWE at that same time line year as u did...I fell in love wit wcw in the 90's before I watched WWF/WWE and was tear apart btw WCW and WWE...I cheated on WCW and dated WWE lol I've been hook on ever since.
@MrJermaine418 Well WWF was always where it was at, WCW was good but I never really watched it because I couldn't, I was too young to watch it, but WWF was on sky sports and on terrestrial TV for us sometimes (RR 2000 was on a free TV channel for us)
@WWEDaniel01 yes but how many yrs ago did taker do that as for edge at that time he was already doin good taker really didnt need to put him over much hunter need to start he should have done that with punk but he didnt i like taker but the guy comes bac just for mania cause the wwe are not buildin theyre wrestlers enough for they can sell mania cause taker dont need to be in the ring anymore u can and see that
@dbzdezz1 Tbh I think its less case of Taker wanting to face HHH, as I know he wants to work with the young guys (also lets not forget from 09-12 he has only made sporadic appearances), I think its more WWE wanting HHH in there than Taker not putting young guys over
@WWEDaniel01 if thats the case let taker put over these young guys cause in the long run wwe will need like they do now and they need to stop feedin hunters ego cause in the long run it will hurt ur company instead of help
if i ran WWE for a day 1.make it TV 14 agian 2.bring back jr to replace micahel cole 3.make the ring ropes red again and change the set back to what it was in the attitude era 4 make more tag teams 5.make feuds last longer 6.get rid of the fucking gimmick ppvs 7.put more personal or intersting stuff in feuds so people can get into them more 8.bring back chair shots to the head, blood, and cursing 9.turn cena heel 10.and for the love of god change the fucking theme songs for each show
7. As they are PG WWE need to tread a careful line with what they put in there storylines, which is may why personal stuff isn't in there as much
8. Chair shots to the head are detrimental to health, why do you think Foley is how he is... blood & cursing isn't need to make a good product, was in the attitude era, but the golden era had none of that
9. If Cena turns heel what babyface is big enough to carry the company and sell merch etc?
2. Get out of the Impact zone, bring the product elsewhere, market TNA more around the world.
3. Better tag teams, ( you put the nail in the coffin with Sorrensen and Neese )
4. Make the product more entertaining.. I can't even sit through an episode of Impact without saying or thinking ; When the hell is this gonna end. It's painful to watch at times.
The knockout tag belts are irrelevant... Getting out of the Impact zine is crucial for the company the shit crowds are really killing the feel of the show, marketing is very essential for the TNA product right now if they want to expand viewership on Spike... TNA do need to make some more tag teams too... The product atm is entertaining for us, and the shows now flow well thanks to Prichard, the shows have been pretty good lately
Getting rid of NXT is needed because it is just a failure, I'd love WWE to show FCW on a major TV network as I really love that product (I however understand why they don't do it due to being a developmental territory etc)... Make divas valets who aren;t good at wrestling would be a way to go... In 2012 younger guys like Barrett/Rhodes need to be elevated to create the next generation of stars for the future of the company
@CustomTrons2011 A good start would be to fire the writers and bring in some wrestling writers, agree there... Building back to women's/mid-card, tag division would be a priority and signing or bring through new talent would be essential to those processes, whether from TNA/ROH or FCW or just guys not on TV like Riley, Kidd etc
I don't think WWE being PG makes it bad, bad writing and booking and lack of star power makes it bad.
If I were in charge I would bring back the old Women's Title belt & the WWE Title belt. I would focus on building new quality Tag Teams to revive the division and fire the useless Divas.
Focus on making the US title more prestigious as Cody did for the IC. If it is more highly rated then you get more stars fighting over it and more people care.
@ChildOfTheWilderness Agree, bad writing is what is doing it, and lack of starpower... Bringing back the old women's belt wouldn't do anything, again it is more about the writing... But quality tag teams are needed and I would want to revive both those divisions which are now non-existent... US title needs prestige much like the IC belt does, they need to give the Us belt to a future star like Rhodes to hold, someone like A-Ri would be good for that belt I feel
@WWEDaniel01 but he can stand out all he wants but it doesnt make him look like good champ its him look like a guy who just can look good wearin a belt cause whats the point of bein a champ when u dont have no to defend agianst
@dbzdezz1 To give the guy a belt for a long time and make him stand out is better than pointlessly giving some guy a belt like Barrett had, I'll admit he hasn't defended it that much but he did defend it twice against Booker recently. I would like him to defend more but the main thing is that he is playing an important role on TV and is doing good things with that belt around his waist
@WWEDaniel01 but how long has cody had that belt if ur if he in the main event scene take the belt off him cause the belt is just around his waist thats it yes booker he did defend agianst but thats it but and he dont need that belt to do good things on tv
@dbzdezz1 Yer but they may as well have the belt on him is he is going to be in a prominent spot on TV, especially going into Wrestlemania where hopefully he will have a big IC title match
@liambrads Shawn could've believably ended the streak, but it will take something big to end it (please not HHH), and that is why I would have no one end it, unless WWE know the guy winning is going to be their TOP GUY
Thank you, Nj!! Wade Barrett would be the best person because of their similar fighting styles, But Kane would be the best just out of sheer honor. I highly agree.
@TheNaturegirl30 Out of shire honor, yes Kane could break the streak, but I'm not sure that will achieve anything really, whereas Barrett could achieve something long term
just to clarify, superstars= pg, goes with wwe's be a star program, raw= tv14, flagship show should have the largest/widest viewing audience. smackdown= pg-13, would help provide great balance for raw being the two largest and well know shows. nxt=r, why, lots of reason perhaps the simplest being we as animals need a place to vent our primal animalistic aggressions. think "down with the sickness" agree or disagree?
hey fist watcha think about this for the wwe, 4 shows 4 diff ratings pg pg-13 tv14 and r for the widest viewing audience for the wwe as a whole. it may seem odd but think vampire movies, "my babysitter is a vampire" pg, "twilight" pg-13, "blade" tv14, and "30 days of night" r. pg= kids some teens/adults, pg-13= kid/teens some adults, tv14=teens/adults/hardcore some kids, r= adults/hardcore some teens. tv14 widest viewing audience do you agree?
@MrNRS85 Ermmm not sure I agree with that, 4 shows a week would be a bit much in terms of production costs etc, and it would be a bit needless as WWE should aim at their biggest demographic from a business perspective anyway, they should try and appeal to everyone with their variation in the product, rather than having different themed shows for different demographics
@ThePagooner Saw that, he wasn't in the Rumble match because they didn't feel it would do anything for him, they want to push him, but they are trying to find the right time to bring him back
am not sure if ya'll know, but according to The Wrestling Observer Newsletter, Crimson is the 2011 overrated star and TNA is 2011 worst television for the 5th time in the row. I don't know what to do with Crimson, but i don't think anybody is ever going to get behind Crimson
@blackrock316 I heard about that, and it doesn't surprise me, TNA always gets bad heat by critics, Prichard has done a good job since taking over, shame it didn't get appreciated more... As for Crimson being overrated, I can see that also, the guy is still very green and his undefeated streak means he has to win all the time pretty much
I hate what they are doing with Wade Barret his feuds are very very predictable. First he trash talk him in one night then other time he interfere at a match then finally before the PPV you have stare down and walk away . The exact same pattern with different opponent nothing is being done with him that is different or creative . Such a wasted talent . WAKE UP WWE!
sneak2attack 4 weeks ago
@sneak2attack The feuds are booked generally right, they have done different things with the feud, you could say all feuds are like that, but WWE are doing it right, the right formula can sometimes be predictable but can still be effective... I don't think for one minute he is a wasted talent or something different needs to be done with him creatively... They are doing it simply and effectively
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
I think Wade could benefit from feuding with Taker even if he lost, it is all about he is booked and how good is the storyline.
You can win all prizes Royal rumble, WWE championship, main even Wrestle Mania, money in the bank and people will still no take you seriously. A good example would be ADR and the Miz. I believe it is not about what you achieved the same would applied to breaking the streak.
sneak2attack 4 weeks ago
@sneak2attack He definitely would benefit from a feud with Taker, I just don't think WWE have got him anywhere near Takers level yet, maybe they could have him feud with Taker at Summerslam and win or something, protect the streak that way. Well making a guy win RR and main eventing WM is a good way to get people to take them seriously, it was just how they followed it up and how he was booked that hurt Del Rio
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
If you were in charge you missed something important divas bikini contest,bra and panty matches and just dressing sexier I mean even if a bra and panty match sucked it had a pay off
Str8talk50 4 weeks ago
@Str8talk50 Yer but in this era that just ain't gonna happen is it
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
The TV title is a massive joke. I think the pope would be the perfect for that championship to make it into a bigger midcard title. WWE is pg yet their demographic is 77% adults and the kids go to sleep during their 1 hour main event so if that 77% goes down then their screwed. If i could control wwe for a day i would destroy FCW and send all thr talent to OVW and destroy wwe films with a bulldozer :) For my question if you guys could control ROH for a day what would you change?
mikej690 4 weeks ago
@mikej690 The TV title could be used so well but TNA made it into a joke for some unknown reason, it should be a mid-card title similar to the IC belt and whatnot... WWE are trying to appeal their product to 23% demographic, which is just downright bad business full stop... FCW is a pretty good product, but they haven't made that many stars, credit that to JR back in OVW days, its more Johnny Ace's (and therefor Vince's) fault than anything... Good question, I'll add that to the list
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 yes you look at crimson or matt morgan and see 2 guys that shouldn't be in the world title picture just yet but their a tag team now and sooner or later they will make them feud why not let the tv title be apart of their feud. FCW is good but alot of people that were called up from FCW like darren young curt hawkings, hell many of them have been fired or arent doing anything. the thing about the tag teams in both wwe and TNA need alot of work like getting the usos over or something
mikej690 4 weeks ago
@mikej690 Well Morgan could be, but Crimson needs more work, I think he will better as a heel personally, which is why I look forward to those 2 feuding at some point (which I'm sure is the whole point of putting them together in the first place)... FCW doesn't produce the best talents, but they have some good ones in there at the moment, its just how WWE chooses to spotlight them which will be important
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 I agree Crimson doesn't look like a good guy he looks like a badass that have poential to be a good heel. wwe should do just like their doing now and thats not to call anyone up untill wwe creative (who are full of people who shouldn't be in the business like stephine ) comes up with a storyline for them
mikej690 4 weeks ago
@mikej690 Crimson should work better as a heel... I do want WWE to stick with only using an FCW guy (like they did Del Rio) if they have something really strong planned for them
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Who would u like to see daft raw to sd n sd to raw ??
ThePagooner 4 weeks ago
@ThePagooner Good question, we will answer this question in a future Q+A
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
I Descoverd WWE at that same time line year as u did...I fell in love wit wcw in the 90's before I watched WWF/WWE and was tear apart btw WCW and WWE...I cheated on WCW and dated WWE lol I've been hook on ever since.
MrJermaine418 4 weeks ago
@MrJermaine418 Well WWF was always where it was at, WCW was good but I never really watched it because I couldn't, I was too young to watch it, but WWF was on sky sports and on terrestrial TV for us sometimes (RR 2000 was on a free TV channel for us)
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Actually WWE's biggest demographic is 50+.
EXXXTACY69 4 weeks ago
@EXXXTACY69 Even though they market to kids, great business model don't you think?
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 I don't know because the older people didn't like the Attitude Era so this this probably appeals to them as well.
Yeah I was surprised by the report I read too.
EXXXTACY69 4 weeks ago
@EXXXTACY69 Well in the golden era they were PG but they weren't trying to appeal to kids, they were still focusing on their main 18-49 demographic
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
hmm i think guys like triple h and taker are at the point where they need to start put young guys over
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 Well HHH is, Taker has put over many young guys
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 yes but how many yrs ago did taker do that as for edge at that time he was already doin good taker really didnt need to put him over much hunter need to start he should have done that with punk but he didnt i like taker but the guy comes bac just for mania cause the wwe are not buildin theyre wrestlers enough for they can sell mania cause taker dont need to be in the ring anymore u can and see that
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 Tbh I think its less case of Taker wanting to face HHH, as I know he wants to work with the young guys (also lets not forget from 09-12 he has only made sporadic appearances), I think its more WWE wanting HHH in there than Taker not putting young guys over
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 if thats the case let taker put over these young guys cause in the long run wwe will need like they do now and they need to stop feedin hunters ego cause in the long run it will hurt ur company instead of help
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 Which is one of the many reasons why people don't want this match to happen
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
kitelime66 4 weeks ago
@kitelime66 While they are good options, some of those are really not realistic because of the era we are in
1) Great idea, but its not the TV14 that is the problem, it is the writing
2) JR has balls palsey, which means he cannot be on TV all the time
3) The ring ropes colour doesn't matter lol
4) More tag teams are needed, watch my tag team solution video on my channel (MrParkin01)
5) Feuds lasting longer is needed
6) Gimmick PPV's are bad and need to be gotten rid of
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@kitelime66
7. As they are PG WWE need to tread a careful line with what they put in there storylines, which is may why personal stuff isn't in there as much
8. Chair shots to the head are detrimental to health, why do you think Foley is how he is... blood & cursing isn't need to make a good product, was in the attitude era, but the golden era had none of that
9. If Cena turns heel what babyface is big enough to carry the company and sell merch etc?
10. Theme songs could change
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
If I ran TNA for a day?
1. Get rid of the Knockout Tag Team Division.
2. Get out of the Impact zone, bring the product elsewhere, market TNA more around the world.
3. Better tag teams, ( you put the nail in the coffin with Sorrensen and Neese )
4. Make the product more entertaining.. I can't even sit through an episode of Impact without saying or thinking ; When the hell is this gonna end. It's painful to watch at times.
CustomTrons2011 4 weeks ago
@CustomTrons2011
The knockout tag belts are irrelevant... Getting out of the Impact zine is crucial for the company the shit crowds are really killing the feel of the show, marketing is very essential for the TNA product right now if they want to expand viewership on Spike... TNA do need to make some more tag teams too... The product atm is entertaining for us, and the shows now flow well thanks to Prichard, the shows have been pretty good lately
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
5. Make the WWE more unpredictable, toss in some actual swerves, stuff we don't actually expect.
6. Get rid of NXT. Nuff said.
7. Get rid of the worthless divas who don't do anything.
8. Get guys like Cody Rhodes and Wade Barrett into the main event.
CustomTrons2011 4 weeks ago
@CustomTrons2011
Getting rid of NXT is needed because it is just a failure, I'd love WWE to show FCW on a major TV network as I really love that product (I however understand why they don't do it due to being a developmental territory etc)... Make divas valets who aren;t good at wrestling would be a way to go... In 2012 younger guys like Barrett/Rhodes need to be elevated to create the next generation of stars for the future of the company
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
If I ran WWE for a day?
1. FIRE THE FUCKING WRITERS. Get GOOD writers who can make GOOD storylines instead of the shit we see today.
2. Build up the tag team division.. WWE needs more quality teams right now to make the tag team division more entertaining.
3. Focus on making the US title more important, give it to someone who could bring more prestige to the belt, someone like Alex Riley or Ted Dibiase.
4. Sign some new talent, call up Cesare and settle a contract with Chris Hero.
-continue.
CustomTrons2011 4 weeks ago
@CustomTrons2011 A good start would be to fire the writers and bring in some wrestling writers, agree there... Building back to women's/mid-card, tag division would be a priority and signing or bring through new talent would be essential to those processes, whether from TNA/ROH or FCW or just guys not on TV like Riley, Kidd etc
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Q&A What do you think of my Michael Cole Song? P.S. Michael Cole is the greatest superstar of all time.
1992yajirobe 4 weeks ago
I don't think WWE being PG makes it bad, bad writing and booking and lack of star power makes it bad.
If I were in charge I would bring back the old Women's Title belt & the WWE Title belt. I would focus on building new quality Tag Teams to revive the division and fire the useless Divas.
Focus on making the US title more prestigious as Cody did for the IC. If it is more highly rated then you get more stars fighting over it and more people care.
JR on Raw Commentary, and Regal on SD.
ChildOfTheWilderness 4 weeks ago
@ChildOfTheWilderness Agree, bad writing is what is doing it, and lack of starpower... Bringing back the old women's belt wouldn't do anything, again it is more about the writing... But quality tag teams are needed and I would want to revive both those divisions which are now non-existent... US title needs prestige much like the IC belt does, they need to give the Us belt to a future star like Rhodes to hold, someone like A-Ri would be good for that belt I feel
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@ChildOfTheWilderness idk about cody who has cody really defended that belt agianst cause any guy can hold a belt
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 But its what they are doing and how they are presenting Cody that is making him stand out and therefore making that belt stand out
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 but he can stand out all he wants but it doesnt make him look like good champ its him look like a guy who just can look good wearin a belt cause whats the point of bein a champ when u dont have no to defend agianst
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 To give the guy a belt for a long time and make him stand out is better than pointlessly giving some guy a belt like Barrett had, I'll admit he hasn't defended it that much but he did defend it twice against Booker recently. I would like him to defend more but the main thing is that he is playing an important role on TV and is doing good things with that belt around his waist
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 but how long has cody had that belt if ur if he in the main event scene take the belt off him cause the belt is just around his waist thats it yes booker he did defend agianst but thats it but and he dont need that belt to do good things on tv
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 Yer but they may as well have the belt on him is he is going to be in a prominent spot on TV, especially going into Wrestlemania where hopefully he will have a big IC title match
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 idk about mania cause he dont have really no one defend against i its awhile from mania but it doesnt look good at all
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 They may have him defend against his real life half brother Dustin Rhodes (i.e. Goldust)
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 But its what they are doing and how they are presenting Cody that is making him stand out and therefore making that belt stand out
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
i think the only wrestler who should end the streak was shawn michaels no one is better than mr wrestlemania
liambrads 4 weeks ago
@liambrads Shawn could've believably ended the streak, but it will take something big to end it (please not HHH), and that is why I would have no one end it, unless WWE know the guy winning is going to be their TOP GUY
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Thank you, Nj!! Wade Barrett would be the best person because of their similar fighting styles, But Kane would be the best just out of sheer honor. I highly agree.
TheNaturegirl30 4 weeks ago
@TheNaturegirl30 Out of shire honor, yes Kane could break the streak, but I'm not sure that will achieve anything really, whereas Barrett could achieve something long term
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Question ...do you think undertaker will be fighting Kane for the next couple of weeks ?? :) please answer
bddesire3000 4 weeks ago
@bddesire3000 Is this for our Q+A or do you want an immediate response... Let us know brother
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Dudley boys the greatest tag team ever? Can you answer my question
thebadguy2656 4 weeks ago
@thebadguy2656 Answer the question you mentioned there, or a question you previously sent in?
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Prime razor Ramon vs prime rock the greatest ever who do you think will win wwedanial01 ???
thebadguy2656 4 weeks ago
@thebadguy2656 The Rock all the time brother
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
just to clarify, superstars= pg, goes with wwe's be a star program, raw= tv14, flagship show should have the largest/widest viewing audience. smackdown= pg-13, would help provide great balance for raw being the two largest and well know shows. nxt=r, why, lots of reason perhaps the simplest being we as animals need a place to vent our primal animalistic aggressions. think "down with the sickness" agree or disagree?
MrNRS85 4 weeks ago
@MrNRS85 As much as I love the creativity and the uniqueness of the idea, I have to disagree for the reasons I stated in the previous comment
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
hey fist watcha think about this for the wwe, 4 shows 4 diff ratings pg pg-13 tv14 and r for the widest viewing audience for the wwe as a whole. it may seem odd but think vampire movies, "my babysitter is a vampire" pg, "twilight" pg-13, "blade" tv14, and "30 days of night" r. pg= kids some teens/adults, pg-13= kid/teens some adults, tv14=teens/adults/hardcore some kids, r= adults/hardcore some teens. tv14 widest viewing audience do you agree?
MrNRS85 4 weeks ago
@MrNRS85 Ermmm not sure I agree with that, 4 shows a week would be a bit much in terms of production costs etc, and it would be a bit needless as WWE should aim at their biggest demographic from a business perspective anyway, they should try and appeal to everyone with their variation in the product, rather than having different themed shows for different demographics
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Thank you for answering my questions!, much appreciated!
saintsrlfc95 4 weeks ago
@saintsrlfc95 No worries brother, thanks for sending them in (I botched your name though lol)
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 haha, i noticed that!
saintsrlfc95 4 weeks ago
Saw on wrestling app that wwe are going push marson Ryan that why was not in rumble match would you like see get a push ??
ThePagooner 4 weeks ago
@ThePagooner Saw that, he wasn't in the Rumble match because they didn't feel it would do anything for him, they want to push him, but they are trying to find the right time to bring him back
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
am not sure if ya'll know, but according to The Wrestling Observer Newsletter, Crimson is the 2011 overrated star and TNA is 2011 worst television for the 5th time in the row. I don't know what to do with Crimson, but i don't think anybody is ever going to get behind Crimson
blackrock316 1 month ago
@blackrock316 well i can say this tna has started off the yr good
dbzdezz1 4 weeks ago
@dbzdezz1 They have indeed
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@blackrock316 I heard about that, and it doesn't surprise me, TNA always gets bad heat by critics, Prichard has done a good job since taking over, shame it didn't get appreciated more... As for Crimson being overrated, I can see that also, the guy is still very green and his undefeated streak means he has to win all the time pretty much
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Name 3 dream matches you would love to see?
ThatSquaredGuy 1 month ago
@ThatSquaredGuy Undertaker VS Sting
Dark92Enigma 1 month ago
@Dark92Enigma Not sure that would get in our top 3...
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@ThatSquaredGuy Good question will will add it to our list and answer the question as soon as possible
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
TAG TEAMS?! Well my oh my, allow me to construct some. Kazarian and Daniels. Abyss and AJ Styles. Zema Ion and Shannon Moore. Devon and Eric Young.
ventekid 1 month ago in playlist British Fist Q+A Series
@ventekid We were trying to construct them without changing current storylines, but still some good suggestions, except Eric Young
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Q&A how would you feel about a IC feud between rhodes & Kidd?
SpazPhoenix 1 month ago
Q&A who would win a no rules tag team match? The British Fist or Beermoney2k?
SpazPhoenix 1 month ago
@SpazPhoenix we'll add it to our list along with the other question brother
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
@WWEDaniel01 YAYYYYYY
SpazPhoenix 4 weeks ago
*drops a knife*
SpazPhoenix 1 month ago
@SpazPhoenix Don't try us lol
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
Turn Orton heel again. Thats what I would do.
23ClevelandCavalier 1 month ago
@23ClevelandCavalier He was always better and more effective (especially with his monster booking) as a heel, but WWe seem to want him as a babyface
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
cool vid
THEMEGADEVILOFUTUBE1 1 month ago
@THEMEGADEVILOFUTUBE1 thanks!
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago
good shit boys!
SpazPhoenix 1 month ago
@SpazPhoenix Thanks brother!
WWEDaniel01 4 weeks ago