Chopin is often called "the right-handed genius", meaning that his brain hemispheres were damn assymetrical and a lot of the good stuff ended up played by the right hand and the LH got kinda neglected. Here Mr.Godowski redresses the imbalance, somewhat. What would Chopin have done if he got a commission to compose a LH concerto, as happened to Ravel?
@MoonMankkkkkk ...in the Revolutionary Etude all melodic action is in the RH, and the LH does up-and-down scales....i.e. our boy is still split between the hemispheres. For somebody who is NOT split between the hemispheres...see the Liszt etudes, by and large....
Point taken-what about Etude 4, Op. 10?-, but to say the left hand was neglected because his "brain hemispheres were damn assymetrical" implies Chopin was deficient in this regard. If not, all your comment amounts to is, "Chopin neglected the left hand, but this wasn't the result of a defect", meaning he chose to "neglect" the left hand because using it sufficiently would have hurt his compositions, (which by their nature require a emphasis on the right hand).
@MoonMankkkkkk ..your last conclusion is on the nose pretty much...except "using LH more would have helped his compositions", probably, but not by much because they are largely OK as they stand. Please note that etudes, by Ch. or anybody else, are highly contrived compositions, so the hand balance in them is going to be distorted by this...that Ch. had this built-in "imbalance" favoring the RH is hardly original with me...am picking it up from my more observant than me musical betters...
Liszt's transcriptions of Beethoven Symphonies... are TRANSCRIPTIONS. His opera fantasies, like the Don Giovanni one, are NOT. "Reminiscences de Don Juan" isn't just transcribing the orchestra, it does to the original pretty much what Godowsky does to Chopin - all in the line with "adding more notes and obfuscating".
Likewise, Godowsky's rearrangements of Chopin ain't transcriptions from piano to piano, neither is Hamelin's campanella (which is a work of genius) or Volodos'
Just because a composer happens not to enjoy others re-arranging their work, doesn't mean no one should. So no, no period. What Godowsky did with these etudes is extremely interesting and engaging, and mostly very enjoyable to me, and that alone does the job of justifying their existence.
And words can't express just how asinine the claim that arranging works for the same instrument is somehow inherently wrong as opposed to transcribing to another instrument, really is.
@twooffour ...you want to concentrate on the distinction between "extremely interesting and engaging", which possibly might be the case, and "musically making sense", and making sense TO WHOM?, which might not be the case. The Godowski "recompositions" are certainly largely very interesting,a good thing the guy went to the trouble, etc.,but, nevertheless, they are are musical bizarreries, circus acts, lending the listener no new emotional
insights...but impressing the "pianist" in some of us..
Franchement si j'aurais touché a cette oeuvre ça aurais été pour la fluidifier, pour la rendre plus simple a l'écoute, la c'est de l'eau lourde.... Ce genre de morceau est déjà presque au nivaux maximum de remplissage polyphonique pour un piano, la c'est du massacre y'en a trop pour être agréable a l'écoute ....
@borisoff22 Yes but these Godowsky versions of the etudes are designed to be nothing more than technical studies (extreme technical studies). He didn't intend for them to be played in concert and so I don't think Godowsky thought of them as 'art' as such.
OMG. The original chopin version is staggeringly outstanding. He plays it almost casually, like its a stroll in the park, yet its phenominally difficult. Horowitz described the first etude as the most difficult of all his etudes, and thats coming from one of the greatest pianists of the 20th C
As always dafuckinmart I salute you and thank you. How great to see a pianist who doesn't have to bang like hell to play with a big and sonorous tone. A wonderful antidote to some other "star pianists" that the sheeplecritics think are great because they look handsome, wear the right designer clothes and have nice teeth.
It's good to have other pianists playing these mostrous pieces, otherwise there is always Hamelin and Hamelin... Berezovsky is one of my favourite, pity he didn't record the entire set of Godowsky-Chopin etudes. I think he has more fire, although Hamelin is always the most technically perfect.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
is it my imagination or is he playing this like an unfeeling thug??? he fucking is you know. what a cunt. yes, cunt. because it deserves to be played like a fountain, not a privvy!!! cunt
yeah, this is the best version, i agree with the person who says he makes it look and sound easy, it shouldnt be a macho agressive thing like ashkenazay (sp?) nor should it be too slow and laboured, like a trial. this is effortlessly beautiful
Sono senza parole!!!!! Mamma mia, adesso vado a vedere se li ha fatti tutti in concerto contemporaneamente gli studi di Chopin, e gli studi sugli studi.... é sovrumano!!!!
I don't know folks. All these complaints about how horrible the Godowsky version is make me wonder if we're listening to the same music. Unlike the overwhelming majority of things I've heard THIS music gets more interesting and moving on every hearing. This is amazingly moving music and Berezovsky has played it fantastically
uncontrolled? thats the stupidest comment ive ever heard on youtube lmao! and ive seen some fairly crazy ones bashing pianists about some crazy things.but i dont think any have ever been as stupid as that lmao
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why are these bootleg videos on here?! This is crap. I agree about Berezovsky's playing though, wonderful, but this video makes him AND youtube look stupid.
The camera work isn't that good. It looks as though the pianist is playing on a ship that's on stormy seas. The camera should be kept still with respect to the stage, not with respect to the pianist.
Well no, perhaps I should be less scathing. The only problem with the camera work was the bizarre look of the piano rocking up and down. Other than that it's certainly no fault of yours if people get in the way, etc etc.
When your average amateur plays this study, by the end his/her right hand is ready to drop off. This guy swings into the godowsky version with barely a pause - amazing endurance.
I am fond of both Hamelin and Berezovsky's rendition of this piece, but I somewhat prefer the latter. In the liner notes that accompany the former's Godowsky CD, Hamelin comments that Godowsky transforms the piece more turbuelently. In my humble opinion, Boris's version here befit's Hamelin's description more aptly.
Agreed wholeheartedly. I have almost worn out the Hamelin CD set since its release. I also saw Hamelin perform this Godowsky etude as an encore in NYC. I thought Hamelin was untouchable when it come to Godowsky-Chopin etudes but Boris...Oh my sweet Jesus! Oh my sweet Lord! This is knuckle-busting virtuosity at its absolute zenith. Oh God!
One of the most spontaneous and masterful interpretation of Op.10-1. He made it sound like a fun precious "tune". As for the Godowsky version of it, I found it less successful than the other paraphrases are (as for Godowsky's work, I mean).
He can play the Godowsky version almost as well as Hamelin. A tad too heavy with too narrow a range of dynamics and tone. However, pretty hard to beat Berezovsky overall.
Simply Amazing, too bad the recording equipment used wasn't the best-like equipment that's actually supposed to record Godly interpretations such as these :/
this man won the Tchaikovsky competition in 1991, he was in a very difficult financial situation in Russia, full of problems and still played an amazing Rachmaninoff's COncerto#3... I love his playing ever since.
I love his performance of the study, is really difficult, hypnotyc i dunno...in you tube really he is the unique man who knows plays exellent Chopin, the piano sounds so good.
I'm sorry to be the odd man out here, but this is the most perfunctorily bland "good" playing I have heard. All that technical skill to waste! What a shame.
I like these recordings much more than his Liszt Etudes video recordings. He seems to have much more control over his technique in these videos. Thanks for these uploads! Berezovsky is starting to make my list of favorite pianists that are still alive.
incredible, the best I have ever heard, much better than Pollini, great, he is one of the best pianist of the world, the problem is eg. Lang Lang or Volodos probably have better marketing or agent?
I say never compare but this man is closer to Richter like a bear where Hamelin is so elegant and clean . elemental like a force of nature . Only thing is if we saw him in something easier would there be more finesse and spontaneity . I'd still rather hear Argerich,Horowitz ,moseiwitsch,Friedman in schumann Kinderszenen than repeated listenings of godowsky. must listen to his cd op.25 #7 and 10 no.9 or 11 .chance to make MUSIC .da dude can sho lite a tune .
godowsky was better. and what's music besides emotionally charged, controlled sounds pleasing to the ear? also, ive noticed that the people condemning godowsky do so only because they cant emulate him. same thing happened with cziffra.
I'm sure some people genuinely don't like his music! Besides, I don't think you could really compare the two composers - one who transformed piano writing, the other of who primarily was an arranger. Incidentally, I don't agree with the previous comment that this piece is only interesting on a technical level. I think that some Godowsky's transcriptions have a lot of music merit, though their technical demands are certainly part of their fascination, much like the Don Juan Fantasy by Liszt.
i have to say, Godowsky did add much musically to chopin's etudes. For example in this one, the left hand eventually branches off and provides a second melody and the right hand differs much from the original etude, which were mainly just arpeggios.
wow!!!
gerardbedecarter 2 weeks ago
great godovisky, berezovsky, and hamelin!
Pollinikrys 4 months ago in playlist Godowsky Chopin 53 Etudes
This guy can play.
Eztoez 6 months ago
So this is what they mean by "tickling the ivories"?
nfsmwrox 6 months ago
Brilliant!
UVAgirl12 10 months ago
I would of shit myself If I got to see that live! :D
ann03071874 11 months ago
Chopin is often called "the right-handed genius", meaning that his brain hemispheres were damn assymetrical and a lot of the good stuff ended up played by the right hand and the LH got kinda neglected. Here Mr.Godowski redresses the imbalance, somewhat. What would Chopin have done if he got a commission to compose a LH concerto, as happened to Ravel?
fredericfranc 1 year ago
@fredericfranc
That's an absolutely absurd explanation and doesn't account for the Revolutionary Etude.
MoonMankkkkkk 9 months ago
@MoonMankkkkkk ...in the Revolutionary Etude all melodic action is in the RH, and the LH does up-and-down scales....i.e. our boy is still split between the hemispheres. For somebody who is NOT split between the hemispheres...see the Liszt etudes, by and large....
fredericfranc 9 months ago
@fredericfranc
Point taken-what about Etude 4, Op. 10?-, but to say the left hand was neglected because his "brain hemispheres were damn assymetrical" implies Chopin was deficient in this regard. If not, all your comment amounts to is, "Chopin neglected the left hand, but this wasn't the result of a defect", meaning he chose to "neglect" the left hand because using it sufficiently would have hurt his compositions, (which by their nature require a emphasis on the right hand).
MoonMankkkkkk 9 months ago
@MoonMankkkkkk ..your last conclusion is on the nose pretty much...except "using LH more would have helped his compositions", probably, but not by much because they are largely OK as they stand. Please note that etudes, by Ch. or anybody else, are highly contrived compositions, so the hand balance in them is going to be distorted by this...that Ch. had this built-in "imbalance" favoring the RH is hardly original with me...am picking it up from my more observant than me musical betters...
fredericfranc 9 months ago
@borisoff22
... Alla Turca showpiece (which is awesome).
They all take a piano piece... and rewrite it for the piano!! Why the hell would anyone do that?? °_°
And, you know, PS: Godowsky did write quite a bit of "his very own compositions". Look it up.
twooffour 1 year ago
@borisoff22
Liszt's transcriptions of Beethoven Symphonies... are TRANSCRIPTIONS. His opera fantasies, like the Don Giovanni one, are NOT. "Reminiscences de Don Juan" isn't just transcribing the orchestra, it does to the original pretty much what Godowsky does to Chopin - all in the line with "adding more notes and obfuscating".
Likewise, Godowsky's rearrangements of Chopin ain't transcriptions from piano to piano, neither is Hamelin's campanella (which is a work of genius) or Volodos'
twooffour 1 year ago
@borisoff22
Just because a composer happens not to enjoy others re-arranging their work, doesn't mean no one should. So no, no period. What Godowsky did with these etudes is extremely interesting and engaging, and mostly very enjoyable to me, and that alone does the job of justifying their existence.
And words can't express just how asinine the claim that arranging works for the same instrument is somehow inherently wrong as opposed to transcribing to another instrument, really is.
twooffour 1 year ago
@twooffour ...you want to concentrate on the distinction between "extremely interesting and engaging", which possibly might be the case, and "musically making sense", and making sense TO WHOM?, which might not be the case. The Godowski "recompositions" are certainly largely very interesting,a good thing the guy went to the trouble, etc.,but, nevertheless, they are are musical bizarreries, circus acts, lending the listener no new emotional
insights...but impressing the "pianist" in some of us..
fredericfranc 9 months ago
Franchement si j'aurais touché a cette oeuvre ça aurais été pour la fluidifier, pour la rendre plus simple a l'écoute, la c'est de l'eau lourde.... Ce genre de morceau est déjà presque au nivaux maximum de remplissage polyphonique pour un piano, la c'est du massacre y'en a trop pour être agréable a l'écoute ....
antok448 1 year ago
jesus boris
you crazy
Csibon13 1 year ago
@borisoff22 Yes but these Godowsky versions of the etudes are designed to be nothing more than technical studies (extreme technical studies). He didn't intend for them to be played in concert and so I don't think Godowsky thought of them as 'art' as such.
kingdave84 1 year ago
OMG. The original chopin version is staggeringly outstanding. He plays it almost casually, like its a stroll in the park, yet its phenominally difficult. Horowitz described the first etude as the most difficult of all his etudes, and thats coming from one of the greatest pianists of the 20th C
Eztoez 1 year ago
Holy fuck!
ann03071874 1 year ago 2
@ann03071874 you're the man
Timmytimtimtm 1 year ago
He and Hamelin. Unbelievable! Perhaps someone could write a piona duo version for the two masters.
Frozentoes1 1 year ago
Anyone has the 2nd (only left-hand) godowsky version of this etude on video???
lottoformulier 1 year ago
Not only outstanding! It's astounding, beyond belief! Absolute beauty and perfection.
moreira7daniel 1 year ago
Bravo, Signore!
chantalmauro 1 year ago
As always dafuckinmart I salute you and thank you. How great to see a pianist who doesn't have to bang like hell to play with a big and sonorous tone. A wonderful antidote to some other "star pianists" that the sheeplecritics think are great because they look handsome, wear the right designer clothes and have nice teeth.
ric55 1 year ago
It sounds like storm!!! "Simfonic" Chopin!!!
Tiefbenkel 2 years ago
I'm glad Hamelin isn't the only one that plays Chopin-Godowsky paraphrases. :)
Wonderful! I want to hear him play paraphrase #42 in A minor, a.k.a. the Winter Wind!
OrangeSodaKing 2 years ago
It's good to have other pianists playing these mostrous pieces, otherwise there is always Hamelin and Hamelin... Berezovsky is one of my favourite, pity he didn't record the entire set of Godowsky-Chopin etudes. I think he has more fire, although Hamelin is always the most technically perfect.
iplongnin 1 year ago
anyone who thinks this is anything but outstanding is a retard
yattaw 2 years ago 15
Couldn't agree more.
Boodistic 2 years ago 2
@yattaw - well I'm fond of this rendition
but let me say that personal taste rules
(among great soloists' renditions of course) and this doesn't imply a mental
handycap omop.
indigoblue555 2 years ago
well put!
bluesyboypete 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is it my imagination or is he playing this like an unfeeling thug??? he fucking is you know. what a cunt. yes, cunt. because it deserves to be played like a fountain, not a privvy!!! cunt
squoocher 2 years ago
Wow, why do you use this video to let the world know that you have an exposed wound? Dick Cheney and Rudy Giuliani are thugs, not Berezovsky.
lipsbach 2 years ago
dont worry,its only your imagination.has nothing to do with the reality.
Achtelnote 2 years ago
Strange. I made a canon of this piece, which can be found in the UNC music library.
divebrakes 2 years ago
yeah, this is the best version, i agree with the person who says he makes it look and sound easy, it shouldnt be a macho agressive thing like ashkenazay (sp?) nor should it be too slow and laboured, like a trial. this is effortlessly beautiful
squoocher 2 years ago 3
he makes this look very easy...
ReturnOfTheStienway 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
YerevanChamberChoir 2 years ago
I love the atmosphere of this "forbidden" video (Y)
piannelly 2 years ago 27
I think that this is the best of 10-1
nhkamakura 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is the original its not godowsky
anonymousQ45 2 years ago
He plays the original first, then godowsky's
JSbeat 2 years ago 2
Sono senza parole!!!!! Mamma mia, adesso vado a vedere se li ha fatti tutti in concerto contemporaneamente gli studi di Chopin, e gli studi sugli studi.... é sovrumano!!!!
prodesica 2 years ago
I love the Godowski version, and Berezowsky gives a phenomenal performance. Outstanding !!!!!!!!!
Eztoez 2 years ago 2
This doesn't sound so good, might be the recording though.
PhilipLu3 3 years ago
Unbelievable
framaulo 3 years ago 6
I don't know folks. All these complaints about how horrible the Godowsky version is make me wonder if we're listening to the same music. Unlike the overwhelming majority of things I've heard THIS music gets more interesting and moving on every hearing. This is amazingly moving music and Berezovsky has played it fantastically
StrivetobeDust 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I find these Godowsky versions just some raped sh*t of beautiful music
lottoformulier 3 years ago
The camera action makes it look like he's playing on the deck of the Titanic...
HooksGambit 3 years ago 6
you could not be more right
budzillab 2 years ago 2
this guy has huge hands, big guy
callenishss 3 years ago
You have a nice camera lol.
trigalg693 3 years ago
I hate the godowsky version, by that, I mean I hate learning and playing it, but it does sound awesome.
Honestly, making the chords even more complicated to pull off as well as adding in scales.
*shudders*
It's freakishly hard to do.
BloodRedGlassMoon 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i hate the way he plays. it's so boyish and uncontrolled
mdoub 3 years ago
uncontrolled? thats the stupidest comment ive ever heard on youtube lmao! and ive seen some fairly crazy ones bashing pianists about some crazy things.but i dont think any have ever been as stupid as that lmao
KearneyPiano 3 years ago 5
Comment removed
Zoidythesecond 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why are these bootleg videos on here?! This is crap. I agree about Berezovsky's playing though, wonderful, but this video makes him AND youtube look stupid.
eirikpilot 3 years ago
The camera work isn't that good. It looks as though the pianist is playing on a ship that's on stormy seas. The camera should be kept still with respect to the stage, not with respect to the pianist.
starkey7uk 3 years ago
just thought i would tell you, its not meant to be a professional recording. So i dont understand why you're expecting quality camera work.
DualThunder 3 years ago
Well no, perhaps I should be less scathing. The only problem with the camera work was the bizarre look of the piano rocking up and down. Other than that it's certainly no fault of yours if people get in the way, etc etc.
starkey7uk 3 years ago
so it would be better for you if you couldnt see this video??
JSbeat 3 years ago
to eirikpilot - I can't get your point ...
quality sucks but you could enjoy a fabolous performance though.
Can't really see anything stupid in this
posting.
indigoblue555 3 years ago
Phenomenal technique. Bravo !!!!!
Eztoez 3 years ago
WOW great powerful rendition ! Thanks!
framaulo 3 years ago
MY god ! you should chop that head !
01016385 3 years ago
I love the Godowsky version's ending.
XDarKMogX 3 years ago
When your average amateur plays this study, by the end his/her right hand is ready to drop off. This guy swings into the godowsky version with barely a pause - amazing endurance.
scordatura 3 years ago
his technique is absolutely flawless
cedmck 3 years ago 3
Wow, i am very impressed, of course this Chopin etude doesn't need any more notes, but Godowsky did a very
good job, and now both hands are trained!
What about his arrangement of the thirds- sixths and other
studies? Thanks to Godowsky!!
Tomorrow i start studying......
pietstamitz 3 years ago
I feel like I'm on a ship on stormy waters.
OorvakanSar 3 years ago 2
I am fond of both Hamelin and Berezovsky's rendition of this piece, but I somewhat prefer the latter. In the liner notes that accompany the former's Godowsky CD, Hamelin comments that Godowsky transforms the piece more turbuelently. In my humble opinion, Boris's version here befit's Hamelin's description more aptly.
fdaltrey 3 years ago 3
Agreed wholeheartedly. I have almost worn out the Hamelin CD set since its release. I also saw Hamelin perform this Godowsky etude as an encore in NYC. I thought Hamelin was untouchable when it come to Godowsky-Chopin etudes but Boris...Oh my sweet Jesus! Oh my sweet Lord! This is knuckle-busting virtuosity at its absolute zenith. Oh God!
auerod 3 years ago 3
yes.. i have the cd of Hamelin playing this.. but boris' version is more alive to me and closer to the original Chopin's version.. (speed)
rvn10rvn17 3 years ago 3
OHH MY GOD
GENIUS
Tortelier18 3 years ago
Visones nutriti, qui ex caveis effugerunt aut fraudulenter a tutatoribus animalium liberati sunt, diversitati naturae Finnicae magna damna faciunt.
Pullos avium et ranas comedentes visones fugitivi effecerunt, ut harum populationes in insulis archipelagi corruerunt.
Vescuntur etiam talpis, quarum deminutio multiformitatem herbarum restringit!!
sadara2000 3 years ago
Prodigieux, encore une superbe version de cette étude de Chopin , la transcription de Godowski est belle aussi... quelle technique et quel talent !
givemetime123 4 years ago
Oui, c'est vrai! Je n'ai pas de mots!! C'est incroyable!!
TimGBone 3 years ago
daaaaaaaaamn just fantastic awsome
dontchacyp 4 years ago
I don't like his version.
kirz0 4 years ago
tell me why. Is he too heavy?
K189T 4 years ago
Was a piece of great music. Turned into an etude. Senseless.
kirz0 4 years ago
Talking about Berezovsky's own version.
kirz0 4 years ago
not about Godowski? I don't understand (I'm French :P)
K189T 4 years ago
This looks/sounds like a world battle!
parule 4 years ago
Pers.op. - g r e a t =
indigoblue555 4 years ago
I wish that he actually did a recording of these etudes for the market so that I could purchase them on iTunes...too bad.
CarloMSantos 4 years ago
there is... but i only find it on the german website of warnermusic.. or just check out on amazon they got it
loves2listen 4 years ago
this audience can't be anything far off from dead, this guy deserves A LOT more 'audible' support than that
lhc89 4 years ago
I really like this piece. Such an excellent workout for the right hand.
xianning 4 years ago
it sounds really strange, but its cool (Y)
berezovsky RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
heroicpolonaise 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yo looks a little bit like bill gates LOL!
mvs1312 4 years ago
OH MY GOD
jeremyajani 4 years ago 4
Well, I like this performance. But what do you expect? He's Russian.
mathbits 4 years ago
does anyone know if Berezovsky will be playing in new york city, any time soon?
unklefutura 4 years ago
One of the most spontaneous and masterful interpretation of Op.10-1. He made it sound like a fun precious "tune". As for the Godowsky version of it, I found it less successful than the other paraphrases are (as for Godowsky's work, I mean).
vitellia 4 years ago
Mi è venuta la pelle d'oca.Mio o dio ma ha 10 dita vero?
MagicDonDino 4 years ago
Oh my god. The guy is a legend. Totally relaxed. Makes it look like a walk in the part.
foghorn73 4 years ago 8
for once a godowsky version sounds nice!! the one for #2 wasn't any better than #4
sppe769 4 years ago
According to my pers.taste this is the best Op.10/1 :
power,technique,musicality,feeling,really involving=
Thx for posting =
indigoblue555 4 years ago 2
He can play the Godowsky version almost as well as Hamelin. A tad too heavy with too narrow a range of dynamics and tone. However, pretty hard to beat Berezovsky overall.
Frozentoes1 4 years ago
FASCINANT !
babaz2 4 years ago
Simply Amazing, too bad the recording equipment used wasn't the best-like equipment that's actually supposed to record Godly interpretations such as these :/
CarloMSantos 4 years ago
this man won the Tchaikovsky competition in 1991, he was in a very difficult financial situation in Russia, full of problems and still played an amazing Rachmaninoff's COncerto#3... I love his playing ever since.
yaniamor 4 years ago 2
I love his performance of the study, is really difficult, hypnotyc i dunno...in you tube really he is the unique man who knows plays exellent Chopin, the piano sounds so good.
clarki333 4 years ago
Fantastic! :))
dolceano 4 years ago
this is simply incredible. this guy is fantastic
danielito1979 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Awful!
nadyart 4 years ago
Let's hear your interpretation and let's compare it to this video which in fact used horrible recording equipment.
CarloMSantos 4 years ago
One handclap and one cough. Really greatful audience.
kmeboard 4 years ago
damn he makes it look easy
vcupiano 4 years ago
what a rich bass
luganskymichelangeli 4 years ago
Too much criticism all around this and other great pianists.Let's enjoy music,beyond personal taste-
Of course I have my fav.but I disagree with extr.
and sometimes unpolite judgements=
indigoblue555 4 years ago
Agree.
CarloMSantos 4 years ago
And now?
robertoparuzzo 4 years ago
to robertoparuzzo: pls go on=
indigoblue555 4 years ago
yes yes i makes me happy
yes he's having fun
specially the inserted octaves in the meddle of the arpegg,...krasy cat the composer and the piano player
fun fun thanks so much!
jpiano1 4 years ago
On the contrary, this is the most brilliant recording I've heard of these two pieces - even if Boris looked totally exhausted by the end!
starkey7uk 4 years ago
I'm sorry to be the odd man out here, but this is the most perfunctorily bland "good" playing I have heard. All that technical skill to waste! What a shame.
ringogiving 4 years ago
holy fuck, this guy's good
dustovshio 5 years ago
I like these recordings much more than his Liszt Etudes video recordings. He seems to have much more control over his technique in these videos. Thanks for these uploads! Berezovsky is starting to make my list of favorite pianists that are still alive.
ivrykeys 5 years ago
This is absolutely brilliant. Richter used to play this roll without hitting the first notes and this is the second one I hear as good.
karakallatore 5 years ago
if you like this you'll love watching him play Liszt's transendental etudes, all 12 are posted!
nahwnitsuj 5 years ago
incredible, the best I have ever heard, much better than Pollini, great, he is one of the best pianist of the world, the problem is eg. Lang Lang or Volodos probably have better marketing or agent?
jungwirthmartin 5 years ago
please dont compare lang lang to volodos or pollini....he isnt up there with them. its like comparing donuts to french pastry.
goobleglob 4 years ago
Two responses:
A. Incredible pianist. Amazing. Flawless. Powerful. Daring. Etc.
B. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA D aGENISU
dnephi 5 years ago
phenominal pianist
dsamogray 5 years ago
Force of nature.
Wergild 5 years ago
bezt vid on youtube
Rob48 5 years ago
This guy is awesome. such a passionate playing and still very controlled. just great. like his liszt etudes
loves2listen 5 years ago
Gosh! What a monster performance! And he is also very musical, too!
chai35 5 years ago
just shoot me. best ever.
supergt26 5 years ago
I say never compare but this man is closer to Richter like a bear where Hamelin is so elegant and clean . elemental like a force of nature . Only thing is if we saw him in something easier would there be more finesse and spontaneity . I'd still rather hear Argerich,Horowitz ,moseiwitsch,Friedman in schumann Kinderszenen than repeated listenings of godowsky. must listen to his cd op.25 #7 and 10 no.9 or 11 .chance to make MUSIC .da dude can sho lite a tune .
lovesGenet 5 years ago
this video (in particular the second half) makes me suicidal...
daeviydt 5 years ago
the chopin is excellent -- but the godowsky/chopin OH MY GOD is just unbelievable!!!
daeviydt 5 years ago
oh man...that's one of the best version i'v ever heard.
Berezovsky is a God.
canardroti 5 years ago
Berezovsky is not a god....he is merely the angelic messenger. Chopin and Godowsky are the gods....
gogolflagen 5 years ago
No, Chopin is a God. Godowsky's transcription is only interesting bcs it's pianistically challenging. Musically, there's not much.
BTW, Berezovsky IS a piano god. One of the best out there.
Perkeno 4 years ago
godowsky was better. and what's music besides emotionally charged, controlled sounds pleasing to the ear? also, ive noticed that the people condemning godowsky do so only because they cant emulate him. same thing happened with cziffra.
goobleglob 4 years ago
I'm sure some people genuinely don't like his music! Besides, I don't think you could really compare the two composers - one who transformed piano writing, the other of who primarily was an arranger. Incidentally, I don't agree with the previous comment that this piece is only interesting on a technical level. I think that some Godowsky's transcriptions have a lot of music merit, though their technical demands are certainly part of their fascination, much like the Don Juan Fantasy by Liszt.
gojewla 2 years ago 2
i have to say, Godowsky did add much musically to chopin's etudes. For example in this one, the left hand eventually branches off and provides a second melody and the right hand differs much from the original etude, which were mainly just arpeggios.
metal248 4 years ago
legendary. Rezpec da mart and dizrespec fo da mofo with da hair (pozz da genie?) blocking da camera.
suremate 5 years ago
Apart from this being illegal, this is bloody fantastic!!!
andreigocan 5 years ago
The Godowsky version is illegal?
cziffra1980 5 years ago
No, the recording. Sorry, I was unclear.
andreigocan 5 years ago
The fury is far beyond what's legal... The gov't couldn't handle its extreme jealousy. I'm sorry, I had to say it.
dnephi 5 years ago
Your comment makes absolutely no sense. Try again.
stxer 5 years ago
It was a joke, making a pun off the fact that a business man named Boris Berezovsky who is a very wanted man.
Sorry for making it unclear lol.
dnephi 5 years ago
ia te uita unde se gasi maestrul gocan sa-si dea cu parerea:)
bergovitz 5 years ago