@eyewarnedyou Hi eyewarnedyou, just wanted to say that I had the time to watch the entire Forbidden Archeology video and while 90% of it is complete bunk, I do find the Steen-McIntryre situation interesting. That they have the peer-reviewed dating of the tools to 200,000 years is a very interesting anomaly, and one I'd be curious to see further research done on.
However, I'm still confused as to how & why that is supposed to discredit general evolutionary theory?
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) frame, and says nothing about whether animal life evolves or not, rather that there are things about human civilisation we still don't know.
B) Cremo's 'Forbidden Archeology' has been debunked so I doubt the video produces any wild new evidence, and furthermore it would again only prove bizarre human occurances, and not the fact that life on Earth generally evolves.
C) I'll be verifying all claims made with external sources.
@eyewarnedyou I'll tell you what, although I've encountered Cremo before and read a bit (got a housemate who is into books on Atlantis and David Icke and all sorts of speculative stuff like that) I'll give these videos a look in the interest of equal time, but first the following points;
A) Should it turn out that there are underwater pyramids that are evidence of an advanced human-alien society some 10,000 years old then that disproves the standard creationist '6000 years' time
Please name me ten credible scientists (who are working within their own specialised field) who have any serious evidence-based argument against evolution and for special creation? There are more historians who deny the holocaust than scientists who deny evolution.
Despite your attempt at character assassination, the fact that life evolves has been proven, and not up for debate. Only the exact mechanisms are subject to scrutiny. You fail.
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) basic understanding of archeology or choose to ignore it in his pursuit of proving Hindu scriptures to be factually accurate. He has no scientific qualifications ("Ancient Aliens" TV show, WTF?) and has been thoroughly debunked. Even if correct, he only deals with humans. What of the other millions of species on Earth? They evolve. Deal with it.
'Evil-lution'? Moronic. I'lll take over 200,000 peer reviewed articles of research over one piece of Hindu
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) political system means nothing to me, and if you think labelling someone a 'liberal' is an insult / valid argument, you're terribly deluded.
Not only that, but quoting the mental midget Palin as though they were your own words is pathetic. Not sure why having a working understanding of evolutionary theory makes one a 'liberal' or what it has to do with Obama, but, ok, sure.
And really? 'Forbidden Archeology'? Cremo is a pseudoscientist who either lacks a
@eyewarnedyou Not sure where to begin here. Evolution is a theory that explains the change in allele frequencies in reproducing populations over time, it has nothing to do with political leanings. I could be a card carrying communist and it wouldn't change the fact that life evolves.
I know Americans are notoriously bad at geography and knowing much about the world outside their own borders - did you know there are many other countries besides the USA? I'm from one of them. Your
@eyewarnedyou I see what you did there. That's almost as witty as the video, which is to say that it isn't. At all. But I suppose I shouldn't expect too much in the way of wit / compelling arguments / evidence / research / or a functioning sense of irony from those who would perform stunning acts of mental gymnastics just to keep their worldview seeming even remotely relevant in the face of its exponentially increasing obsoletion.
I have a friend (who was a strong Ron Paul supporter) that had to have surgery to remove 10% of his brain due to cancer. After the surgery the doctor came out and said it was much worse and they had removed 82% of his brain and he likely would never wake up.
We waited days and then he finally came to and shouted :
if someone needs a new "working" brain then that working brain has to come from someone.. any donors..? hey, I know.. how about we open a Holy Bible and get to work on fixin' the broken part..?
They actually stuffed up the end part saying the creationist is priced lower and has actually been used... lol even listen to it.
BuffaloSoldier2007 3 weeks ago
@eyewarnedyou Hi eyewarnedyou, just wanted to say that I had the time to watch the entire Forbidden Archeology video and while 90% of it is complete bunk, I do find the Steen-McIntryre situation interesting. That they have the peer-reviewed dating of the tools to 200,000 years is a very interesting anomaly, and one I'd be curious to see further research done on.
However, I'm still confused as to how & why that is supposed to discredit general evolutionary theory?
Take care, K.
matthewktube 4 weeks ago
That is so mean to religious nuts, but damn FUNNY LOL
BuffaloSoldier2007 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) frame, and says nothing about whether animal life evolves or not, rather that there are things about human civilisation we still don't know.
B) Cremo's 'Forbidden Archeology' has been debunked so I doubt the video produces any wild new evidence, and furthermore it would again only prove bizarre human occurances, and not the fact that life on Earth generally evolves.
C) I'll be verifying all claims made with external sources.
Anyway, I'll watch. Cheers.
matthewktube 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou I'll tell you what, although I've encountered Cremo before and read a bit (got a housemate who is into books on Atlantis and David Icke and all sorts of speculative stuff like that) I'll give these videos a look in the interest of equal time, but first the following points;
A) Should it turn out that there are underwater pyramids that are evidence of an advanced human-alien society some 10,000 years old then that disproves the standard creationist '6000 years' time
matthewktube 1 month ago
so the stupidity from the creationist will transfer over
tERtasdf 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) propaganda anyday.
Please name me ten credible scientists (who are working within their own specialised field) who have any serious evidence-based argument against evolution and for special creation? There are more historians who deny the holocaust than scientists who deny evolution.
Despite your attempt at character assassination, the fact that life evolves has been proven, and not up for debate. Only the exact mechanisms are subject to scrutiny. You fail.
matthewktube 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) basic understanding of archeology or choose to ignore it in his pursuit of proving Hindu scriptures to be factually accurate. He has no scientific qualifications ("Ancient Aliens" TV show, WTF?) and has been thoroughly debunked. Even if correct, he only deals with humans. What of the other millions of species on Earth? They evolve. Deal with it.
'Evil-lution'? Moronic. I'lll take over 200,000 peer reviewed articles of research over one piece of Hindu
matthewktube 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou (CONT) political system means nothing to me, and if you think labelling someone a 'liberal' is an insult / valid argument, you're terribly deluded.
Not only that, but quoting the mental midget Palin as though they were your own words is pathetic. Not sure why having a working understanding of evolutionary theory makes one a 'liberal' or what it has to do with Obama, but, ok, sure.
And really? 'Forbidden Archeology'? Cremo is a pseudoscientist who either lacks a
matthewktube 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou Not sure where to begin here. Evolution is a theory that explains the change in allele frequencies in reproducing populations over time, it has nothing to do with political leanings. I could be a card carrying communist and it wouldn't change the fact that life evolves.
I know Americans are notoriously bad at geography and knowing much about the world outside their own borders - did you know there are many other countries besides the USA? I'm from one of them. Your
matthewktube 1 month ago
HA HA Excellent:)
grannygrunt1000 1 month ago
@eyewarnedyou I see what you did there. That's almost as witty as the video, which is to say that it isn't. At all. But I suppose I shouldn't expect too much in the way of wit / compelling arguments / evidence / research / or a functioning sense of irony from those who would perform stunning acts of mental gymnastics just to keep their worldview seeming even remotely relevant in the face of its exponentially increasing obsoletion.
TRANSLATION FOR DULLARDS: Weak. Caps lock, off!
matthewktube 1 month ago
Awful.
matthewktube 1 month ago
Thanks!
ChristiansofAsia 1 month ago
I have a friend (who was a strong Ron Paul supporter) that had to have surgery to remove 10% of his brain due to cancer. After the surgery the doctor came out and said it was much worse and they had removed 82% of his brain and he likely would never wake up.
We waited days and then he finally came to and shouted :
"O'Bomb'a 2012"!
mrsparex 1 month ago
if someone needs a new "working" brain then that working brain has to come from someone.. any donors..? hey, I know.. how about we open a Holy Bible and get to work on fixin' the broken part..?
Dewdaahman 1 month ago
haha didn't expect that answer :D
polar7rulz 1 month ago
LOL
BenPeckover 1 month ago
The human brain is unbelievably powerful. We are fearfully and wonderfully made. :)
PP Simmons - is again awesome. No explanation needed for Pastor Carl - it speaks for itself.
ThePowerandlight 1 month ago
A second hand brain....I'll go for that!!When can we start?
Spitbak 1 month ago
Try this watch?v=KnJX68ELbAY
Psy0psAgent 1 month ago