Added: 4 years ago
From: applejuicevideos
Views: 48,907
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @wilhamlin look at Leopard, I can run Leopard on a 2002 PowerBook G4 perfectly fine, no crashing etc and Leopard even runs fine on a 2001 867 MHz Power Mac G4.

  • the reason "so many" people had problems with vista is because they tried to install it on a dinosaur computer. Window's even told everybody "this OS is a big deal, and it won't run correctly on anything on anything that wasn't built in the past year or so" but then again who reads that kind of stuff anyway.

  • Have you noticed there ready to kick windows while there down but when windows 7 comes out they shut right the fuck up.

  • I think windows 7 speaks for itself, it kicks ass!! But I guess moving to xp from vista is upgrading indeed, not too familiar with vista.

  • i didnt know mac is so desperate to need to resort to this kind of propaganda to get its sales...

  • No comment... I HATE YOU STUPID PC!!

  • Linux sucks most

  • @pufixas Have you tested it?

  • @FierceRaindrop

    Of course, first time I installed it instantly had problems with sound, and the updating...

    Software suck too...

  • @pufixas I've never tested it, but I thought you were just another mindless fanboy. Good thing that I was wrong.

  • mac suck¡¡¡

    linux rocks¡¡¡

  • If that sexy woman came with my mac then I would come too lol

  • Vista is pretty good now. Now that is has Services pack 2. Don't know when SP3 will be here.

    I do plan on getting a computer soon. But might install Vista Ultimate 64-bit. Kinda hate the look of windows 7.

  • @packstack15 so your chosing looks over sheer performance?

    you will never get married, a chara

  • @MegaFinnyboy hey jackass, wtf does getting married have to do with my personal option over computer operating systems?

    Are you really that stuck on computers to think like that? You need a life.....

  • Windows 7 is faster and better than XP and Vista. But stupid people dont want to realise that.

  • @peterinfamilyguy The only difference between Vista and Windows 7 is the name and the patchs / service packs.

  • @ericopfusco Yes, and it has a performance upgrade too. Win 7 is quite fast. But as i said, stupid people cannot see the difference in speed.

  • @peterinfamilyguy WoW, is it ? You should try a unix operating system sometime, lol.

  • aaaaah no commet

  • WISHBONE MOTHER!!!

  • HAHAHA!!! No Comment!!!!

  • No comment! xDDD

  • PR Sucks.

  • wow MxMaster1772, I'm sure you won't see this but you're a dunce.

    Microsoft works to keep backwards compatibility, but Starcraft II isn't by microsoft, its by Blizzard

  • Ya well i have right click!!!

    so take that....

  • All you "XP-beats-all" People!!! could you install a Starcraft II on an XP for me please??!! So much for backward compatibility!!! Oh sorry!! I'm not even sure PC users know what that means!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • now we have win 7 and every thing is all right.

  • pc: ' and with your new os leopard with those cool features may even switch to you' pr lady: 'no comment' - just so funny. Only to bad pc fanboy's/users can't see that this pubs are for the fun...

  • i have a laptop i can't have a mac thanks to my parents

  • i did get a laptop with vista soo wrong now have xp win7 and linux

  • Even me...a huge Ms fan would say Vista sucks, but come on it was a beta, go on microsoft's website. They say it was a beta.

  • No comment

  • XP beats all lol

  • put it this way, my dad works for the NHS they use Windows XP why dont they use MAC, hmm?

  • cause mac's don't run many of the files that he needs

  • @Marmalade624 because PCs are cheaper and are the viable computer when needing to run word processors or spreadsheets. if you want a computer for everything OTHER than word processors and spreadsheets - get a mac!

  • The only real downside to Macs are that they don't have much customization hardware-wise. I remembered trying to play Crysis on a Power Mac, didn't work very well.

  • HAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH crysis on mac whyd u even try

  • Someone said that Macs could easily play Crysis, seems he was wrong.

  • @zenokro It is called Bootcamp. If you have a mac and want to play games, you can simply use bootcamp. Not much of a challenge or obstacle, really. Plus, you have a powerful, well-designed computer on top of that.

  • @pgeske

    you can't upgrade parts as games get more advanced, you have to buy another mac

  • @zenokro why always upgrade? You'll be a child playing games until you're 40?

  • @OlivierMyre88

    yea don't upgrade run with a 2011 mac in 2020 and see whats up right?

  • @zenokro Still running with a 2005... stfu please.

  • @OlivierMyre88

    ya fuck ur life

  • @pgeske i don't know about well-designed, but it's not that powerful compared to how much you paid for it... besides, why buy an overpriced mac so that you can run Windows on it when you can either buy or make a PC, get Windows and Mac on it, for a fraction of the price...

  • I've noticed that most of the people who go on about how a PC/Windows is better than a Mac don't happen to work on a help desk or as a desktop support tech for a medium - large size business/corporation where you get FAR more exposure to many more kinds of problems.

    When you have that kind of soul sucking experience, you'd be begging for a Mac. Trust me.

  • I actually had the opposite experience. I temped at a large school in the IT department, and in the entire time I was there ( only a month, thankfully), we had more apple products fail on us than anything.

    Are macs bad products? No, but failure rates start to seem inflated when you're called in at stupid o clock to sort out basic issues a child could fix.

    Neither product is Superior in a traditional sense, they're just different.

  • @iBrandon85 Unsupported - Wrong

    What the hell do you mean by falling for the advertising, what do you expect them to do , praise the PC ?

    And yet your username has the well known apple i on it

    ie.. iMac iPod ? For someone who apparently hates apple , you do like using there well known i campain

  • You're a idiot mac's are very limited in hardware and software so YES unsupported.

    ibrandon85 dates back to my first aol screen name in '95

    you can search aol records for it, since apple released their iCrap campaign everyone figures apple which i can see any mactards being confused. don't bother replying to any of my comments i refuse to argue anymore on the subject seeing how each and every mac user is a complete idiot.

  • Ok , when did i mention anything about about limited hardware , and by saying you refuse to , you are bailing out to something htch you started by leaving that ridiculas comment .And , no nt unsupported , being a mac user i think i do know mor about apple than a hater ,whitch by the way , i find pathetic .I f you dont like them , what makes you think by commenting oin the video , will make a difference ?

  • Mac software is better and always will be.

  • i like macs but i perfer pc's since i have been using pcs since i was little.

  • yes completly

  • is windows 7 better?

  • got a mac and i love it =D

  • Sadly it's true

    I wanna get rid of Vista in this Laptop and get back to XP ;___ ;

  • What's wrong with Vista? I have Vista and I like it more than XP.

  • i like the system a bit, but it is a resource slut. if you take a glance at most PC game boxes, you will see it needs a significant increase in hardware.

  • LOL. i already did.

  • @GsLucky get a Mac. ;)

  • @ericopfusco get a PC

  • @GsLucky  mmm w7!

  • @GsLucky get either XP or 7 i love them

  • come on !! all that i hear from the mac guy is 1)i made home video 2)i have itunes thats all;;;

  • And...it is possible to get itunes for a PC, and windows moviemaker works just fine for movies

  • I love the fact that the commercial never mentions that if you buy a mac you'll have a VERY hard time finding 3rd party software for it... but of course the crappy emo loser commercials can make up for that... I hate it when a company has to rip on a competitor to get ahead just build quality products you morons and they will sell no need for the desperate annoying commercials

  • You've never actually used a mac, have you? Have you?

  • i have and guess what, it was packed up and put in my basement 2 yrs ago....its still there.

    The mac is okay imo, but i still love my PC.

  • Go mac you're the best!!!!

  • no comment lol

  • upgrading to an older version - that's funny

  • I'd rather read SUPASWAG!

  • Hey wait, didn't Apple have to hire an entire PR department in order to make these ads?

    Microsoft PR is pretty annoying but at least they don't bombard my television with biased, insulting advertisements.

  • This is an AMAZING advertising campaign!

    They are "putting down" PC because Microsoft is virtually their SOLE competition; these commercials are quirky, funny, and intrigue people to look into the Mac experience.

  • If you have to make fun of others to make you own product look great, you have a problem.

  • he didnt make this dumbass, apple did

  • If Apple has good products, why do they keep making commercials that put down on PCs?

  • Because it's just so damn FUN! I love kicking a bully when he's down on his face in the dirt.

  • Because Apple is making comparison of their computers to what is the majority out there in the market, WinPCs.

  • I still like the Novell linux-pc-mac commercials

  • Mac vs PC was put to rest years ago.

  • so we thought. a dumb petty war that keeps going and stupid consumers that continue to fuel it.

  • Hahaha, their ads are stupid and WRONG.

    Besides, Microsoft by law have to own 20% of Apple so they're not a monopoly.

    Mac fails big time.

  • The ad isn't the only one that is stupid and wrong...

    That stupid 20% monopoly is TOTALLY wrong. And, by saying that, you're saying that apple is bigger than microsoft (which is totally not true)

    I USE a PC, not a Mac. You info was just totally wrong.

  • Where (what law) precisely does it state that 'Microsoft have to own 20% of Apple'? I have never heard of such a law that forces any company to buy into another company. It appears what you are saying is manifestly incorrect: but heh show us the legislation.

  • Well, ever heard of the mixed market economy? i.e. The economies we live in. It's up to the government to protect small businesses. Microsoft was dominating the makret, but monopolies are illegal unless they're publically owned (PLCs). Basically, US govt. said that M$ had to buy into apple, to stop them being run into the ground. The reason for this being, competition breeds efficiency- lower prices for consumers.

    There's your damn legislation.

  • Ok, how about instead of giving us that "history lesson" and passing it off as a law, how about you actually cite or post the statute number, etc., that way anybody can actually look for himself/herself and read the actual language of the statute? Specifically, I'm talking about the one that Microsoft had to buy into Apple.

    There is no statute? I thought so. In that case, why don't you give the case citation for the case law so that we can see where it's written. Can't do that either?

  • So where's the law???? As jklunk01 says you're trying to give us a history lesson.

  • Microsoft does not own a single piece of Apple since they sold back all of the NON-CONTROLLING shares. The only reason Microsoft bought shares of Apple was to make themselves look like the good guys when they were getting butt-fucked by the U.S. government for the evil deeds they committed.

  • So where's the law????? As jklunk01 says you're trying to give us a history lesson. You haven't produced any law yet.

  • hypocritical ! I am a great mac fan but new macs are forced to run leopard and do not allow you to "downgrade" to a older more stable experience such as tiger.

  • Good point. I'm in no rush to upgrade to Leopard because I think Tiger is more visually appealing (and really, who cares about 'stacks', I don't).

  • i have panther lol

  • I read an article that said that every OS upgrade is actually LESS efficient (in terms of speed) than the previous. That's why the system requirements are always risen with each OS release. Jaguar would probably run much faster than Leopard if both were used on the same computer.

  • That's why we buy new macs.

  • lol a lot of companies do that

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more