Instead of fighting I would start praying, with all the methane that has exploded in fountains at the north pole that extincted the dinosaurs along time ago, the earth is in a lot of trouble from mans selfishness.
Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
@rickydepths1 Yes, but as scholars point out, the inference is that Moshe would "draw out" or "save" a people, as Moshe in fact did, especially at the Red Sea when God saved and delivered them "out of water". This is not my own interpretation of the significance of the name, but that of scholars who know nothing of this code.
So the code is accurate. I have simply used the meaning assigned to it by others who have written commentaries. The said literally meaning is also in my notes at website.
In Jesus Name May God open the eyes of all those who believe there wisdom is greater than Him. Satans lies are taking you away from the focus of true salvation. Conform not to the will of the world but to the will of God. There is but one Way and that is through Christ Jesus. Daniel 7 V 27 tells us that all DOMINIONS shall serve and obey him(JESUS). If you look to your own wisdom you are all fools. Proverbs 9 v 6 Forsake the foolish, and Live; and go in the way of understanding. Glory Be To God
@topthickproducer No friend --- no nothing. Bleak outlook. But what if there is a God. Perhaps this is what makes you puke, the sense that there IS a God and not that there is none.
If you understand who we are in God's eyes, you will see clearly who Babylon is. Is 1:21 Israel has become a harlot! (remember-babylon is mother of harlots Rev 17:5). It was full of justice; righteousness lodged in it but now murderers. Your princes are rebellious and companions of thieves; everyone loves bribes and follows after rewards. They do not defend the fatherless nor does the cause of the widow come before them. Remember James 1:27.
@msmelancholy1 James 1:27 states this: Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their trouble and to keep oneself unspotted from the world. Don't you find it interesting how in Isaiah God is angry that Israel is not defending the fatherless and the widows (which are christians who have been cut off from God because they have been decieved) and James tells us that is the essence of christianity?
Babylon has to be something that all Christians would be a part of and that eventually goes bad and gets so bad that God must punish her. Don't forget: Judgement begins with the house of God. What is the house of God? It is the body of believers, the body of Christ. It is Jerusalem, Israel. Those who believe in Christ are Abrahams seed. They are Israel. Jesus said "you are a city set on a hill" We are jerusalem. God is going to punish the old jerusalem and make a new Jerusalem Rev 21.
To say Babylon is the world system makes no sense. Paul the apostle clearly states in order to not be in the world you would have to leave the world.1 cor 5:10. paul tells us to separate from any BROTHER who does not obey God's commandments. He tells us we r not to judge the outside but to judge what is within so that theory that babylon is outside system makes no sense. We r not to love the world but we cant leave it. The outside system is not babylon.
@msmelancholy1 Yes, I agree the term Babylon also has specialized meanings, including what you are saying. But I think we have to be careful that we don't reinvent the same problem by thinking that we can sit as judge and jury over all that names the name of Jesus. Let us judge, but let us judge will the utmost himility, sorrow and compassion.
Mercy mixed with fear: Perhaps this is the way you are already, broken of spirit, and if so, you will not be offeneded by my exhortation. God bless!
to poster of this video: this was extremely interesting. I am going to check this out myself. what blew me away was how you put babylon as church. very few know this, at least that i know of. every christian has a different interpretation of who babylon is. i know it is the church. tell me how you came to believe that yourself. tell me who think antichrist is. according to scripture, there is not one man who will be antichrist, but it is anyone who denies Father and Son. your thoughts?
@msmelancholy1 The Names Bible Code does not say that the Church is Babylon, it simply reads that God calls His people out of Babylon. "Babylon" itself, remains undefined. The word "Babylon" at the end is inferred. The code literally ends as, "Those called out". But it begs the question, "What are they called out of?" Because the rest of the Names Code refers to Babylon, Babylon is the logical exodus point. I think Babylon symbolizes the world system. This includes man-made religious systems.
@777Shekel777 what do you mean by man-made religions. I think christianity has been so manipulated by christians themselves. Every christian has their own "christ" or in other words everyone has their own idea of what the bible means, but we are supposed to be of one mind and one accord, hence the whole thing is ruined, defiled, and everyone is worshipping their own idea of God within the body of Christ. That is babylon in a nutshell.
@777Shekel777 what do you mean by man-made religions? I think christianity has been so manipulated that it is a man-made religion. Every christian has their own of what the bible means, but we are supposed to be of one mind and one accord. Every christian is worshipping their own idea of God; hence the whole thing is ruined, defiled. That is babylon in a nutshell. Everyone is committing spiritual adultery by worshipping their own idea of who God is. It is not supposed to be this way.
@msmelancholy1 If you think about it, what you are saying is that if everyone agreed with you and thought the same way, then the Church will be united and come about of Babylon. But I am afraid it is a little more complicated than that.
@TruthIsSalvation The meaning of the name is what is important, and who it represents, not the sound it makes. What does it matter if we address God as Lord, or Jehovah, rather than the more accurate YHWH? The name means "to be", as in "I will be what I will be", or "I am that I am", or, I will be (to you) what I will be". This is what this wonderful name means. But to pronounce it properly is not what God is after, but to honor Him by our actions, that is what the bible teaches.
They will rant on to tell you what to think but not how to think
You have a question to ask them this is blasphomy just for interupting them
Ask the pracher a simple question like what is your name instead of answer Jack you will get a lecture on how a donkey was called donkey LOL or how God made Adam or a puzzle a lecture about the trinity. I prefer the man who informs your queires and not divert you from them. preachers waste your time listening to them
@777Shekel777 I completely agree with TruthIsSalvation. You are not allowed to ask questions. Everyone has to listen to one man give you his interpretation of the scriptures, but Paul the Apostle explains in 1 Cor 14:26 that we are all supposed to contribute for edification of all. It was never intended for one man to speak to the sheep of God. That is why God is angry with the shepherds- cuz they did not feed the sheep: Ezek 34:1-16; Jer 50:6-10, Jer 23:1-4 are a few scriptures about this.
@msmelancholy1 I agree with this pretty much. I belong to a house church and all share freely. I will not yield my God-given privilege to REALLY participate in "Church". But I also know that God's people are in traditional churches and that their leaders will be rewarded for the good they do. God is merciful.
@26mel1 No, I'm not mad. It sounds like you're angry though! Truth can make people mad or even drive them mad, because it educes them to reluctantly consider that there is a God to whom they are accountable.
I quote from another site: "According to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage. The virgin birth of Christ is not only an historical fact, but it was also a necessary historical fact when one considers all the data." Thus, both Matt. and Luke's genealogy are correct. Only one could avoid the curse, the virgin-born One
@777Shekel777 Thus, the genealogy shows that Jesus overcame this curse by being virgin born. Jer 22:30 "Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man [that] shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah." That's the point. Jesus became a curse for us. He adopted into himself all curses, and bore them on the cross, including the curse upon the royal line, by himself being legally attached to Joseph.
@777Shekel777 Why not a code using the meaning of the names in the bible in Matthew's genealogy, a genealogy that emphasizes grace and mercy to fallen man? The bible code is real. Check out the curse upon Levi. "His seed would be scattered in Israel." But, God turned a curse into a blessing by scattering them as priests! And so it is here with Jeconiah. God turns a curse into a blessing ---greater than ever. Amazing grace! Jesus is from Jeconiah through Joseph ---and praise God for it.
@777Shekel777 LOL Can you stop ranting and answer the questions directly.
What is the personal name God spoke onto Moses? Let me give you a clue it is written as YHWH in english, in hebrew the letters are pronounced as Yodh Heh Waw Heh. So equipped with this information do you know how to CORRECTLY pronounce this God given name or NOT?
God HIMSELFwrote this name and spoke/UTTERED this name to Moses
Do you know how to pronounce YHWH? just answer the simple question & dont rant about the meanings
@TruthIsSalvation The blood of Messiah, Yeshua (Jesus), God's son, is what cleanses us from sin, not how we pronounce Jesus' name or the name given at the burning bush.
By the way, the name at bush was "Ehyeh", "I AM", not Yahweh, which is only what WE call God because we would not say, "I AM" (EHYEY), (that is, what God calls Himself), but rather, "He IS", that is, (YHWH). This proves that it is not how it is said, but what it means.
But, sorry to rant about what you are expert about!
@thirtysilver Hebrew is not English. In Hebrew, the use of the construct "of" occurs simply when two nouns are joined together. There is no word in between. Thus, two names side by side can be in construct, thus the "of". (Enosh) "Mortal-man" --of--- (Kenan) "sorrow" = "Man of sorrow", but this word is different than what "Adam" means ("Man"). Enosh means "a man that can die", and thus, "Mortal Man" --- of --- "Sorrow". Semitic languages seem only strange to us, not to those that speak them!
@777Shekel777 Then Enosh does not literally mean "a mortal man of." That is an Anglicization, hmm? An imperfect translation means this part of the code may be deciphered incorrectly.
@thirtysilver Yes it means, literally, "a mortal man", although perhaps it would have been better translated simply as "man" for the sake of simplicity. See my website for answers to many of your questions about the names bible code.
@26mel1 Yes, but the way it is used in Genesis means "man". Otherwise, why do scholars debate the first five chapter of Genesis, if whether "ADAM" should be translated as "man" or as "Adam": (Example, Gen. 1:26-28; 5:1) . Example: Gen. 5:1, the Hebrew word "ADAM" is found twice, but the first time it is translated "Adam", while the second time it is translated "man". This happens again in 5:2. So, the bible itself tells us what it means. Good enough for me --- and the scholars apparently!
@26mel1 Now, it is possible to say that ADAM means man, which is derived from the Hebrew word that means 'reddish ground'. I have no problem with that. But that does not effect the code. Adam means man and man means clay. But the bible itself uses several play on words in Genesis with the personal name of Adam to mean man in Genesis, and so why not the bible code also? So it is not that I disagree with you about the reddish clay, but of your insistence that it does not mean 'man' as well.
@thirtysilver One thing, though, is that your comment made me to realize that i should have left out the nuance of meaning here and just left it at "man of sorrow" so as not to confuse anyone. I will omit it from my website, but the video is already there. It is not wrong, just added information that need not have been included.
This PROVES beyond all shadow of doubt the divine inspiration of the Bible! Good thing that the lord and his father gave us this valuable information.
But Jesus isn't of the lineage of Joseph. He was born of a virgin.
And secondly, according to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage. Sorry to say, this video is wrong. It sounds nice, but it just doesn't work.
@MegaCalvinHobbes Let us cut to the point. You are not saying the video is wrong, you are saying that Matthew is wrong since the video is essentially taken straight from it. How strange this sounds from someone who at the same time claims to believe in the virgin birth! I will not labor to answer your objections here, and we are limited to 500 characters anyway. But search the internet. Your objections are answered by many others more capable than myself. I believe God inspired Matthew!
Did you even READ my comment? Let me put it simply. Matthew describes Joseph's lineage. Jesus was born of a virgin. Since Mary had a virgin birth, Joseph is not the father. Since Joseph is not Jesus' father, this lineage is not Jesus'. Get it? Or are you too stupid to believe that you're wrong, and you have to set up straw men arguments?
@MegaCalvinHobbes Mat 1:1 "This is a record of the birth of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
Mat 1:16 "Jacob fathered Joseph, the husband of Mary, who was the mother of Jesus, who is called the Christ.
Mat 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon were fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ were fourteen generations." The bible speaks for itself!
@MegaCalvinHobbes For what purpose is Matthew's genealogy then, if not to show that Jesus lineage through Joseph was authentic, legally speaking? It matters not in the least whether Joseph was Jesus' physical father. He was his legal father according to inheritance rights and that is all that matters. Jesus was entitled to the throne of David, that is the point of Matthews genealogy. I know there are other theories, but to me that makes most sense. No matter what, the code is real.
@777Shekel777 OK, since you don't get it, I'll say it a third time.
"He was his legal father according to inheritance rights and that is all that matters. Jesus was entitled to the throne of David, that is the point of Matthews genealogy."
I said, "According to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. "
So, by "law" Jesus WOULDN'T be entitled to the throne.
@777Shekel777 No offense Shekel777, you must read the Davidic Covenant in 2 Samuel 7:1-17..This is a physical seed and blood covenant, NOT AN ADOPTION! They MUST issue from David's offspring's loins. Jesus doesn't quality, sorry!
@Tzephaniyah That's the point. Jesus comes from the line of David, BOTH through Mary and Joseph, his legal father. This way, technically, Jesus is not the flesh descendant of Coniah, and thus the prophecy is undisturbed. Yet, it is still the legal lineage of Jesus no matter what you say. Jesus descended from Coniah through Joseph, his step father, but through his mother by-passed Coniah. The names code follows the legal ancestry of Jesus. If in your mind this disqualifies Yeshua from this honor?
@777Shekel777 LOL! Please READ the Davidic Covenant! There is not such person coming from the LOINS of David born of a "holy spirit." That's Greek Mysticism my friend! READ MY LIPS: IT TAKES A PHYSICAL SEED, I.E. SPERM OF A MAN TO FULFILL THE DAVIDIC COVENANT! NO WAY AROUND IT! Don't spiritualize something that is meant to be physical! Bad "hermeneutics!"
@TruthIsSalvation This is only laughable if you deny the most basic of Christian beliefs, that is that Jesus was both full God and fully man. As a man, Jesus' father was legally Joseph, but not by birth through Joseph because Jesus was born of a virgin. If you deny this then you are a heretic, plain and simple.
@lusem09 That's all well n good for the NT but it doesn't line up with Torah! He still doesn't qualify to be a Moshiach!! Read the Davidic Covenant! The Moshiach will have sons to pass the throne too...from my understanding of NT, Yeshua died childless! AND please, spare me the spiritual aspect of his death! That doesn't line up with the promise either! We don't know who the Moshiach is yet until the Most High reveals it!
@Tzephaniyah , the bloodline of Yeshua & Mary of Magdal was covered up by the church , so He is the Messiah as you keep stating the Messiah had children .
@26mel1 Covered up by the church? So tell me my friend, have u ever read the requirements for being King from the Torah? READ Deut 17:14-20 and let me know if Yeshua fit this description for being King over Yisraal. AND, if your theory is right, then tell me why his throne was NEVER perpetuated by his sons that he had from Mary of Magdalla? He was and is no moshiach!!! He was hung on a tree which is a sign of being cursed according to Torah.
@Tzephaniyah Jesus the Messiah absolutely fit that description. He obeyed the Father unto death. He turned neither to the right nor the left. He laid down His life for His brethren, but what you must understand is that His Kingdom has not come yet, but when it does, it will fill the whole earth. As for your question about where in the old testament does it state that Messiah must die, read Is 53- whole chapter. Also Father and son are one, so Immanuel (God with us) laid down His life.
@msmelancholy1 Jesus never had children! That is a lie. He did not live His life as others. All of his life, since He was a child he studies the scriptures and taught them. He was a rabbi and taught in the synagogues. His whole 33 years were about doing His Father's will. He did not marry nor have children. It might interest you to know that I was born a literal jew and raised jewish. I have believed since I was a child that Jesus is the Son of God.
@26mel1 The DaVinci Code is nonsense, which is where you are getting this stuff. The genealogy in Matthew and Luke is the true genealogy of Jesus, and it ends with Jesus, who had no physical heir, only "sons" in the non literal sense.
@Tzephaniyah You have stated the answer to your own question, but it obviously is not satisfactory to you. All who have faith in Yeshua (Jesus) the Messiah are the "seed" of Messiah. There are those who are the physical seed of Abraham and there are those who have the faith of Abraham, of both Jews and the nations. May you find Yeshua the Messiah, the savior of all men.
@777Shekel777 Can you PLEASE show me from the Hebrew scriptures where the Messiah is SUPPOSE to be the savior of all men? THERE IS NO PROPHECY REGARDING THE MOSHIACH THAT SUGGESTS SUCH A THING! A man CANNOT save you from sin!
@Tzephaniyah That's a big question for so little space! How about Isa. 9:6.
"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be unpon His shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end..." etc.
"NO END". Sounds like an ever expanding dominion affecting all men. And, who is this "Mighty God" born to sit on David's thone?
@777Shekel777 LOL!!! Let me quote this passage from the Hebrew script: " For a child HAS BEEN born to us, a son HAS BEEN given to us, and the dominion will rest on his shoulder; the Wondrous Adviser, Mighty Elohym, Eternal Father, called his name Sar-Shalom (prince of peace)" This is the correct understanding of this passage my friend. NOTICED the past tensed usage HAS BEEN. The child was ALREADY born when the prophet spoke these words.He was referring to King Hezekiah 2Kings 18-20;2chro 29
@Tzephaniyah So all the translations are wrong! However, it is common knowledge that most prophecy is written in the prophetic future tense.
And "Elohim" is simply Hebrew for "God", which still begs the question: "Who is this Mighty God/Elohim that is born? -- Even if past tense as you insist. Is Hezekiah God?
It says: "Of the increase of his government and of peace there shall be no end..." Not true of Hezekiah. The kings of Judah had their end in 586 BC, but the prophecy says, "No end".
@777Shekel777 If you are going to study the Hebrew script, then you MUST get your head out of the English. The word Elohim DOESN'T mean "god" is Hebrew. It's translated either "powers" or "mighty ones." Did you know that Mosheh was called an Elohim? Read Exodus 7:1. AND if you read the Davidic covenant u will notice that the Most High told David that his kingdom will not end. so it hasn't ended, just postponed until the restoration of all things take place. Hezekiah was just a part of that..
@Tzephaniyah I am very busy the next 5 days and so will have to get back to you about your three comments.
But quickly, as far as Moses being called Elohim, well, that's the point. Moses will be like God to Pharaoh and Aaron like his prophet. Yes, it is possible that it can be translated as, "I will make you mighty to Pharaoh..., but that would rather weaken the point, would it not? The context favors the normal translation of "God", and thus it is almost universally translated as such.
@Tzephaniyah By the way, "Elohim" is almost always translated as God, and to a lesser extent, gods, but only a very few times, mighty (or mighty ones, rulers, angels). As I am sure you know, Elohim is in the plural because it is the plural of majesty. Nor is the definite article "ha" always necessary to translate it "God".
But back to Isa. 9, " אל גבור" It would be redundant to say: "Mighty Powerful". How much more simple to translate "EL" as God, "Mighty God"! This followed by "Everlasting."
@777Shekel777 very simply my friend, look up the meaning of the name Hezekiah and it will give u that understanding. Again, what would make u think this is talking abt Jesus when this passage in it's context is for the ppl of that time, not 500 years in the future! What sense does that make? how would that benefit the ppl of that time? NONE! so your argument is out of context! Futhermore, as important as u christians make jesus out to b, why isn't his name EVER mentioned in the Hebrew script?
@Tzephaniyah Prophecy often applies to the immediate situation, but also speaks beyond that into the far future as well. Tell me how you can read Isaiah and not come away with that sense?
@777Shekel777 Continued: The Most High never had a problem mentioning ne of his key servant's names b4 they were even born. 4 example, King Yosiah, Samsom, etc. He even goes to the extent of mentioning a non-Israelite 150 years b4 his birth (CYRUS)! Now, if he is wiling to do this for a non-Israelite, then he wouldn't had ne trouble CLEARLY mentioning the so-called SAVIOR OF MANKIND! It just doesn't line up with the consistent pattern of the Most High's thoughts throughout the Hebrew Script!
@Tzephaniyah Mat. 1:21 “And she shall bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name JESUS; for it is he that shall save his people from their sins.”
While the name “Yeshua” is not explicitly given, the Gospel of Matthew is correct to say that what his name means encapsulates the hopes and desires of everything expressed in the entire bible. But God did not predict the actual name of Messiah, otherwise, you tell me his name since you believe that Messiah is still to come?
@777Shekel777 That's the whole point my friend, the Most High didn't give us THE name of the messiah b/c there will NOT just b ONE anointed one. All anointed ones will die and pass their kingship to their sons and to there sons; so forth n so on! Get the picture? NO ONE COMING TO DIE FOR SINS! YOU R RESPONSIBLE 4 UR OWN SINS!! Furthermore, if I'm going to believe Matt 1:21 then what about Matt 1:23. It says his name shall b emmanuel. Which one is it. Many contradictions in the NT! Not reliable
@Tzephaniyah Emmanuel is what he is called in the sense of what the name means, "God with us". Jesus was indeed called, "The Son of God", and in that sense, "God with us".
Your view on many messiah's is just one view among rabbis, and the wrong one I might add. Isaiah 53 shows that Messiah will both suffer and be glorified afterward, as do other prophecies. Not two messiahs, but one. Yeshua is your Messiah, the Lamb of God who took away the sins of the whole world.
@lucky258i I checked out ur guy Mark Blitz n I marvel how he uses the Hebrew Alef/bet to paint a false picture of this Yeshua character. The name Yeshua in Hebrew is NEVER depicted as a person. It simply means salvation. In Gen 1:1 the house that he is referring too is the house for adam, who was a son. Guess where he placed his son? In the Garden! So the only way the son can get back into the house is thru Yeshua, i.e. TORAH! Psa 19:7 The Law of Yahowah is perfect, converting the soul..."
@Tzephaniyah I'm still waiting for someone to explain Debarim 24:16 to me! I've ask this question in this venue for over a month now but it's being avoided like the N1H1 vaccine, LOL! but in all seriousness, I respect each person in this forum eventhough we may differ in doctrine but I will NEVER bash a person b/c he or she is a precious soul! I ONLY come against an ideology/philosophy that has been handed down to all of us! Shalom aleichem to you my friend!
@lucky258i Don't b marveled by the trickery of man's wisdom but always reproof the scriptures by how the Creator thoughts n designs. He will NOT violate his design! It's amazing how individuals try to come up with their own theory to try n insert their own thoughts into the Hbbrew script. Why is it that this Jesus character is so clandestine in the Hebrew script that one needs high powered binoculars to find him but every other major character is plain as day light! SMH!
@Tzephaniyah Yes, but if you take the original passage and look at it - it still will be there - that cross - even if Yeshua isn't a name but a meaning (salvation) then you must realize that the cross IS DRAWN and that is one of the many fingerprints God left to show that Jesus is the salvation in Torah - So my understanding is that Christ already came into the world. Jews don't need to wait for another one cause that one will be the Antichrist when the third temple will be built.
@lucky258i Keep in my, the cross symbol that it makes is referring to the hebrew letter TAV which looks like a cross. It means a sign or a mark. Salvation has already been granted to ALL mean through Torah. No one needs to die for ne one. Mosheh couldn't do it when he tried. Also, in studying the coming of the moshiach in hebrew, where does it show that he will come 2 times? Where does it CLEARLY show he will die for sins? Where does it say THUS SAITH YAH IN THE NEW TEST? Does Yah tell ne man...
@lucky258i to write anything in the NT? Does the Hebrew script CLEARLY show that the Moshiach would die on a roman crux? Does the Hebrew Script CLEARLY show that the Moshiach would rise from the grave after 3 days? Does the Hebrew Script show CLEARLY that the Moshiach would go back to heaven n come back down again to set up his "earthly" kingdom? Please answer these simple questions for me!!!!!
@Tzephaniyah To me The Old Testament/Torah is filled with prophecies about Jesus - and they happened precisely what the prophets said - The New Testament says that God put a vail over His peoples eyes so they wouldn't know the time of His coming. That was His plan to save the gentiles too. Question - why where Jews obligated to make sacrifices?.. if God doesn't need a ransom for sins and all He needs is the law - why make sacrifices? To me, the sacrifices pointed towards Jesus as a sacrifice..
@lucky258i So now we have the Scriptures according to Lucky! LOL! My friend, if u never were introduced to NT first, u wouldn't come to these conclusions. It's called circular reasoning. Yah never said he put a vail over his ppl's eyes! Yisraal knew exactly what their punishment would b for serving strange gods. Yah told them precisely what would happen to them. He told them that they would b by-word n a proverb, i.e loss of identity b/c of them being scattered. but he promised to revive...
@lucky258i us unto himself again! Blood sacrifices were not the only way to atone for sins. Read Ps 51 n u will c tht David only needed to REPENT from his sins. not offer up a bull. Read Hosea 14:1-3. This is when Yisraal was in the land of their captivity and what did they use for forgiveness of sins? READ IT N C. These are things the church don't teach. They sway ur mind to believe a certain way. They take scripture out of context n form a pretext!
@Tzephaniyah You're not looking for him, he's all through the Torah. The Torah was written on Lambs skin, Yeshua is the Lamb of God, he's the Torah made Flesh. After his death, the temple was destroyed and there is no need for anymore sacrifices. His blood atoned for your sins. Yes, a veil is upon many Jewish eyes, read Romans 11:25-29. Explain to me though,when you get your temple built, who will be clean and pure enough to be the High Priests? God alone made Aaron the High Priest. Who now?
@juniemoon Please show my ONE Hebrew script that even remotely comes close to saying Yeshua is the "lamb of Yah?" Human blood CANNOT atone for ne sins. Human sacrifice is an abomination to YHWH. Read the Hebrew script carefully my friend, blood wasn't the only way to atone 4 sins. Wen the temple is rebuilt he will select 4 himself priests Isa 61:6; 66:21. Clean n pure doesn't have a thing to do with being sinless! Ur missing the point! Aaron wasn't sinless!
Furthermore, these r "end time" passages which hasn't come to pass yet. If your Yeshua is THE HIGH PRIEST of YAH, then why would YHWH select priests and Levites in that day 4 himself? PLEASE EXPLAIN! Let me ask u a question, if blood was the only way to atone 4 sins, then please explain Hos 14:1,2. The 10 tribes were in captivity in the north where there were NO SACRIFICES being made. How were their sins forgiven? I await ur response!
@777Shekel777 Yes, most prophecies are written in that sense but within the context of the time period given. For example, one cannot take Isa 7:14 and says it is speaking of Jesus 500 years in the future when the sign was for King Ahaz. furthermore, if Isa 9:6 was speaking of Jesus, then where is his everlasting kingdom? Please show me any hebrew script that even HINTS at the fact that the messiah was coming to die for our sins..PLEASE! I BEG YOU!!! Deut 24:16. Please explain this verse to me!
@777Shekel777 If you NEVER were introduced to the NT, you would have NEVER come to the conclusions about the Messiah, which is NOT just ONE person but many, that you have been taught by the western thinking scholars. If you READ the entire contexts of the prophecies concerning the anointed ones, u will see that they will be married and have sons that will take over after they die, thus a kingdom without END! There is much u have to unlearn my friend. Keep seeking n u will find truth! Shalom!!
@Tzephaniyah Past tense because God is Almighty God and knows His plan. It was established since the foundation of the world. According to scriptures, the kingdom of the Messiah will fill the whole earth and there will be no end to it. Hezekia's reign ended. How can you, if you just read the scriptures, believe the passage is about Hezekiah?
@msmelancholy1 What makes u think this passage is talking abt Jesus? This passage predated Jesus some 500 years. What sense would it make for this to be talking abt some 1 coming 500 years down the road when the ppl needed political deliverance @ that time? True, hezekiah's reign ended but the throne of David hasn't. Hezekiah was jst a piece of the puzzle like solomon and the rest of the kings were! All Messiah's (anointed Ones) die! They don't live forever. That's why we have the David covenant
@Tzephaniyah God did not predict the actual name of Messiah, otherwise, you tell me his name since you believe that Messiah is still to come? Are you saying that God is unwise to not name him at all, or just unwise if Yeshua is that Messiah? Either way you are saying that you are wiser than God.
@777Shekel777 I'm not saying I'm wiser than Yah! All I'm saying 2 u is that u are using circular reasoning n arguments from silence to prove something that is not there! Your textual criticism lacks basic hermeneutical skills when it comes to the Hebrew Script. BTW: the "us" in Gen 1:26 is found in Prov chapter 8 the entire chapter but focus on vs 22-end. That will give u the "us" U WILL NEVER SEE YAH MENTION "ME N MY SON" in the Hebrew Script. Everything with ur jesus is covert! its not clear!
@Tzephaniyah Ok. You are not saying you are wiser. But speaking of names and Proverbs, can you answer this one? מה־שׁמו ,ומה־שׁם־בנו
Proverbs 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, and descended? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? Who hath bound the waters in his garment? Who hath established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou knowest?
Such hints about Messiah are found throughout the bible. Hidden, yes, but still there.
@777Shekel777 LOL! Why is it that Jesus is always portrayed in a clandestine way in the Hebrew Script? It amazing that most major events r pretty clear! Ne way, to answer your question for Prov. 30:4 is very simple: R U READY? Exo 4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith Yahowah, Israel is MY SON, even my firstborn:
Exo 4:23 And I say unto thee, Let my SON go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn.
@Tzephaniyah Interesting take on that, but the reference to "ascending and descending" from heaven to earth must at least make you wonder?
Surely, this is more than a mere hint that God was descend as man to earth and that the seed of Eve will "bruise the serpents head", as per the first prophecy recorded in the bible. Yeshua is that "Seed", come forth through Abraham and David, and will one day finish what He started by casting the serpent, the devil, into the lake of fire.
Deu 4:14 And Yah commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, that ye might do them in the land where ye go over to possess it.
Deu 4:15 Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of FORM on the day that YAH spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Deu 4:16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the FORM of any figure, the likeness of MALE or FEMALE." IS JESUS A MALE FIGURE
@Tzephaniyah That's a good point, at least at face value, no pun intended.
But the bible (New Covenant) teaches that Yeshua was not a man before His birth, but that he existed as a member of the Trinity as a spirit being, just as God the father is. At the incarnation (that is, becoming flesh), Jesus remained God but was henceforth both fully God and fully Man. And so, there was no image of Yeshua (Jesus) as a man to make an idol of back then, nor should we make images "to bow down to" today.
@msmelancholy1 Maybe your God can do that but the Most High Yah in the Hebrew Script doesn't have to come down to give his life. He is the creator, we r his creation. That statement is blasphemous! If that were the case, why didn't he come down at the initial fall of man and died then? At least it would have given all of us the opportunity not to fall or sin ourselves. You r thinking just like a Greek minded person. He is the most high of equal weights and balances.
@Tzephaniyah The scriptures tell us He came down at the appropriate time that He chose. He sent His Son to shed his own blood so that the world could receive forgiveness of sins if they followed Him with all of their heart. For the blood of bulls and goats, etc. can never take away sin. That was to point the true way of forgiveness of sins which is through the shedding of Jesus' blood who is the Son of God. Otherwise, this world which is swallowed up in evil, would have no hope.
@msmelancholy1 U christians never cease to amaze me with ur contradictions..supra..u said, God came down in flesh and laid down his life for the whole world." but her u said, "He sent his son to shed his own blood so that the world could receive forgiveness of sins.." So which one is it, God or his son came down? and which Hebrew Script that says that clearly! PLEASE SHARE! U still didn't answer my question above!
@Tzephaniyah As the name's code begins by saying, which is what all Christians believe, "The God-Man shall come down..." Yeshua (Jesus) is both fully God and fully man.
But let me ask you a question. Who is the "us" and "our" in this and other passages like it?
Gen 1:26 And Elohim said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness;
Gen 11:7 Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. And Jehovah scattered them thence...
@777Shekel777 There is NO SUCH CONCEPT as a god/man. That is Greek mythology my friend! You've been watching Clash of the Titans too much! LOL! When one tries to bring Greek thought into Hebrew thought, one has the tendency to distort the true essence of the language. YAH CANNOT n WILL NOT BECOME A MAN! Job 9:32
@msmelancholy1 What of pile of brainwashed crap. You mean the boudhists, have no hope ? You mean 4 billion people( who don`t believe in Christ) on earth, have no hope ?
@msmelancholy1 He would have had to give the people of the so-called Old Testament the same opportunity! So if your paradigm is correct, then the people of the "OT" were doomed! Is this your premise? If not, then explain to me how they were able to make it without someone dying for their sins?
@Tzephaniyah He has. Have you not heard of abraham's bosom? The people in old testament, such as all of the true prophets and those who truly obeyed Almighty God with all of their hearts are waiting to be resurrected along with the true followers of Almighty God at the resurrection. We are all one, those who follow and seek Him with all of their heart. We will all be one at the time of Jesus' Return.
@msmelancholy1 Can u please show me where ne 1 is waiting in some so-called Abrahom's bosom? Again, this is Greek theology not Hebrew! U r using arguments from silence that have no bearing on Hebrew thought or culture. Abraham was buried in the cave of machpelah. there is no RESURRECTION of the dead, lol! as u call it. No one is going to be popping out of graves. Again, that's Greek thinking my friend!
@msmelancholy1 Furthermore, if the Most High Yah would come down in the flesh n die, he would cease to be the Creator of the universe. He doesn't have to do that, he's already made provision within all of us to make the right choices in life...PLEASE READ GEN. 4:6-7. After reading this, tell me if the Most High had to come down and die for Cain in order for him to be cleansed of his sin? If not, then what did the Most High tell Cain?
@MegaCalvinHobbes I fail to see your point. The Matthew genealogy is in the bible and is said to be Christ's, even if it is traced through Jesus' stepfather Joseph. It is still the legal line of descent and recorded for us by the Holy
Spirit. So why are you diminishing it's importance?
@777Shekel777 I thought you'd bring up that point, hence "And secondly, according to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage."
So either this IS Jesus' genealogy, which means, according to the Bible, means he can't be king, or it isn't his genealogy, which means this video is wrong. I think you're wrong, not the Bible
@MegaCalvinHobbes Mat 1:1 "This is a record of the birth of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
Mat 1:16 "Jacob fathered Joseph, the husband of Mary, who was the mother of Jesus, who is called the Christ.
Mat 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon were fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ were fourteen generations." The bible speaks for itself!
@tuscani423 Hi! Every name is explained in detail. Only a few names are in doubt, and context helps. There is a note there about "Jacob" as referring to "Jacob" as a nation in the bible, also called "Israel". (See note for more, Youtube limits my length to explain here.) More often than not, names with multiple meanings only add to the code because either way reads well, a kind of play on words, thus revealing more complexity, not less.
I'm just wondering why at first it says that Jacob means outwits his enemy....but at the end it says Jacob means Jacob. I would love to say that this video is legit as a Christian, but If I can notice something like that, imagine what an atheist will notice. I've tried to look up from Adam to Noah, but we simply do not know for sure what some of the names mean, and others have multiple possibilities.
@tuscani423 Hi! Every name is explained in detail. Only a few names are in doubt, and context helps. There is a note there about "Jacob" as referring to "Jacob" as a nation in the bible, also called "Israel". (See note for more, Youtube limits my length to explain here.) More often than not, names with multiple meanings only add to the code because either way reads well, a kind of play on words, thus revealing more complexity, not less.
@CabukMustafa --- Yes, this is what makes the code so remarkable. The names in Luke's genealogy do not read as anything at all. I have tried. This does not mean that the genealogy in Luke's gospel unauthentic, rather, it has it's own purpose, and a 'names bible code' is not it. But what it does show is how difficult and unusual it is for the names code to exist at all. In other words, this is not something easily reproduced by randomness, otherwise any genealogy would do.
Yes, David did not come from the lineage of Moses, and I explain that in a note in the video itself, and more thoroughly in my website. I also state that the names code reads just as well without the addition of the names to do with Moses, but also that it was clear to me that these additional names were intended to be added as again explained in the note. You should not be so hasty to comment without getting your facts straight first. The LOL is on you, not me.
Even more surprising is that once you get to Abraham, the rest of the names all the way to Jesus Christ are relatively easily strung together, and the meanings of the names much less uncertain.
In other words, the first 20 names are the hardest, but after that the next 60 are easy.
So why it was not fully discovered earlier? This is the real mystery. Same for the acrostic: For 40 centuries, rabbis and scholars poured over this early genealogy but did not notice it! That's the real miracle!
My comment was not meant to be funny, but I suppose it could be construed as such!
Anyway, the acrostic code itself is certainly no joke, but a powerful message embedded in the bible, apparently there for about 4000 years, staring thousands of scholars in the face and yet no one, that I know of, every noticed it. This is the real miracle of the acrostic bible code -- why no one noticed it before. We are talking about something that has been studied forward and backward over thousands of years.
Instead of fighting I would start praying, with all the methane that has exploded in fountains at the north pole that extincted the dinosaurs along time ago, the earth is in a lot of trouble from mans selfishness.
brenda30490 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
downyourtube 2 months ago
It's a Bloodline of rape and my video proves it.
downyourtube 8 months ago
@downyourtube
who raped you? LOL!
(dude, NO ONE is clean, including you! but if you dwell on the 'rape', you will end up in the same room with the rapists!! Really!)
madenew000 5 months ago
@madenew000 Do yourself a favor and watch the video.
downyourtube 5 months ago
@downyourtube
you have a twisted, corrupted mind. get cleaned up now!
madenew000 5 months ago
And it reveals what?
There's nothing new in the 'code'
ie... your point is????
daggyz1959 9 months ago
Awsome!
TiborasaurusRex 10 months ago 2
MOSHE AKA MOSES MEANS DRAWN OUT OF THE WATER.
rickydepths1 1 year ago
@rickydepths1 Yes, but as scholars point out, the inference is that Moshe would "draw out" or "save" a people, as Moshe in fact did, especially at the Red Sea when God saved and delivered them "out of water". This is not my own interpretation of the significance of the name, but that of scholars who know nothing of this code.
So the code is accurate. I have simply used the meaning assigned to it by others who have written commentaries. The said literally meaning is also in my notes at website.
777Shekel777 11 months ago
@rickydepths1 it still means the same thing
CrusaderGundam 11 months ago
Great video!
ChristiansofAsia 1 year ago
In Jesus Name May God open the eyes of all those who believe there wisdom is greater than Him. Satans lies are taking you away from the focus of true salvation. Conform not to the will of the world but to the will of God. There is but one Way and that is through Christ Jesus. Daniel 7 V 27 tells us that all DOMINIONS shall serve and obey him(JESUS). If you look to your own wisdom you are all fools. Proverbs 9 v 6 Forsake the foolish, and Live; and go in the way of understanding. Glory Be To God
MaMaZ275 1 year ago
@MaMaZ275 Ah-mayn! Ah-mayn, bro! All glory to Adonai! Maranatha!
hoseajeremiah 1 year ago
You people that need a friend in the sky make me puke.
topthickproducer 1 year ago
@topthickproducer You assume there is no pie in the sky.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@topthickproducer No friend --- no nothing. Bleak outlook. But what if there is a God. Perhaps this is what makes you puke, the sense that there IS a God and not that there is none.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
If you understand who we are in God's eyes, you will see clearly who Babylon is. Is 1:21 Israel has become a harlot! (remember-babylon is mother of harlots Rev 17:5). It was full of justice; righteousness lodged in it but now murderers. Your princes are rebellious and companions of thieves; everyone loves bribes and follows after rewards. They do not defend the fatherless nor does the cause of the widow come before them. Remember James 1:27.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 James 1:27 states this: Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their trouble and to keep oneself unspotted from the world. Don't you find it interesting how in Isaiah God is angry that Israel is not defending the fatherless and the widows (which are christians who have been cut off from God because they have been decieved) and James tells us that is the essence of christianity?
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
Babylon has to be something that all Christians would be a part of and that eventually goes bad and gets so bad that God must punish her. Don't forget: Judgement begins with the house of God. What is the house of God? It is the body of believers, the body of Christ. It is Jerusalem, Israel. Those who believe in Christ are Abrahams seed. They are Israel. Jesus said "you are a city set on a hill" We are jerusalem. God is going to punish the old jerusalem and make a new Jerusalem Rev 21.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
To say Babylon is the world system makes no sense. Paul the apostle clearly states in order to not be in the world you would have to leave the world.1 cor 5:10. paul tells us to separate from any BROTHER who does not obey God's commandments. He tells us we r not to judge the outside but to judge what is within so that theory that babylon is outside system makes no sense. We r not to love the world but we cant leave it. The outside system is not babylon.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 Yes, I agree the term Babylon also has specialized meanings, including what you are saying. But I think we have to be careful that we don't reinvent the same problem by thinking that we can sit as judge and jury over all that names the name of Jesus. Let us judge, but let us judge will the utmost himility, sorrow and compassion.
Mercy mixed with fear: Perhaps this is the way you are already, broken of spirit, and if so, you will not be offeneded by my exhortation. God bless!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
to poster of this video: this was extremely interesting. I am going to check this out myself. what blew me away was how you put babylon as church. very few know this, at least that i know of. every christian has a different interpretation of who babylon is. i know it is the church. tell me how you came to believe that yourself. tell me who think antichrist is. according to scripture, there is not one man who will be antichrist, but it is anyone who denies Father and Son. your thoughts?
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 The Names Bible Code does not say that the Church is Babylon, it simply reads that God calls His people out of Babylon. "Babylon" itself, remains undefined. The word "Babylon" at the end is inferred. The code literally ends as, "Those called out". But it begs the question, "What are they called out of?" Because the rest of the Names Code refers to Babylon, Babylon is the logical exodus point. I think Babylon symbolizes the world system. This includes man-made religious systems.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 what do you mean by man-made religions. I think christianity has been so manipulated by christians themselves. Every christian has their own "christ" or in other words everyone has their own idea of what the bible means, but we are supposed to be of one mind and one accord, hence the whole thing is ruined, defiled, and everyone is worshipping their own idea of God within the body of Christ. That is babylon in a nutshell.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 what do you mean by man-made religions? I think christianity has been so manipulated that it is a man-made religion. Every christian has their own of what the bible means, but we are supposed to be of one mind and one accord. Every christian is worshipping their own idea of God; hence the whole thing is ruined, defiled. That is babylon in a nutshell. Everyone is committing spiritual adultery by worshipping their own idea of who God is. It is not supposed to be this way.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 If you think about it, what you are saying is that if everyone agreed with you and thought the same way, then the Church will be united and come about of Babylon. But I am afraid it is a little more complicated than that.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@tyler18c
No God will not open your eyes if you choose to keep them wide shut
what is God's personal name if names have so much to tell?
Why Jews and christians no longer use that name?
YHWH
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation The meaning of the name is what is important, and who it represents, not the sound it makes. What does it matter if we address God as Lord, or Jehovah, rather than the more accurate YHWH? The name means "to be", as in "I will be what I will be", or "I am that I am", or, I will be (to you) what I will be". This is what this wonderful name means. But to pronounce it properly is not what God is after, but to honor Him by our actions, that is what the bible teaches.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
Can you stop ourself from ranting and answer the question direct?
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation , he can't , he can't see Truth either , he just rants as you say , LOL !!!
26mel1 1 year ago
@26mel1
Beware of preachers!
They will rant on to tell you what to think but not how to think
You have a question to ask them this is blasphomy just for interupting them
Ask the pracher a simple question like what is your name instead of answer Jack you will get a lecture on how a donkey was called donkey LOL or how God made Adam or a puzzle a lecture about the trinity. I prefer the man who informs your queires and not divert you from them. preachers waste your time listening to them
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation I think my viewers can tell who the ranter is.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
Still has not answered the questions LOL
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation Please, its only been a day or two!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 I completely agree with TruthIsSalvation. You are not allowed to ask questions. Everyone has to listen to one man give you his interpretation of the scriptures, but Paul the Apostle explains in 1 Cor 14:26 that we are all supposed to contribute for edification of all. It was never intended for one man to speak to the sheep of God. That is why God is angry with the shepherds- cuz they did not feed the sheep: Ezek 34:1-16; Jer 50:6-10, Jer 23:1-4 are a few scriptures about this.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 I agree with this pretty much. I belong to a house church and all share freely. I will not yield my God-given privilege to REALLY participate in "Church". But I also know that God's people are in traditional churches and that their leaders will be rewarded for the good they do. God is merciful.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation , You're 100 % correct on that one :-)) Bless you .
26mel1 1 year ago
Very interesting!
stevestewart7777 1 year ago
@stevestewart7777 ; What childish nonsense. You can find codes in any book. Just set up the right compuper program.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon This coming from someone who cannot spell computer correctly!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
you're mad
26mel1 1 year ago
@26mel1 No, I'm not mad. It sounds like you're angry though! Truth can make people mad or even drive them mad, because it educes them to reluctantly consider that there is a God to whom they are accountable.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 , nope ! but I don't tolerate fools , hah !
26mel1 1 year ago
@tyler18c
I never followed the code fromNoach fprward, etiher WoW
lusem09 1 year ago
I think you mean "epic" proportions, not epoch.
pabobfin 1 year ago
@pabobfin Not sure where you are referring to. It would be nice to know in order to correct the spelling error. Thanks!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
I quote from another site: "According to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage. The virgin birth of Christ is not only an historical fact, but it was also a necessary historical fact when one considers all the data." Thus, both Matt. and Luke's genealogy are correct. Only one could avoid the curse, the virgin-born One
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Thus, the genealogy shows that Jesus overcame this curse by being virgin born. Jer 22:30 "Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man [that] shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah." That's the point. Jesus became a curse for us. He adopted into himself all curses, and bore them on the cross, including the curse upon the royal line, by himself being legally attached to Joseph.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Why not a code using the meaning of the names in the bible in Matthew's genealogy, a genealogy that emphasizes grace and mercy to fallen man? The bible code is real. Check out the curse upon Levi. "His seed would be scattered in Israel." But, God turned a curse into a blessing by scattering them as priests! And so it is here with Jeconiah. God turns a curse into a blessing ---greater than ever. Amazing grace! Jesus is from Jeconiah through Joseph ---and praise God for it.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 LOL Can you stop ranting and answer the questions directly.
What is the personal name God spoke onto Moses? Let me give you a clue it is written as YHWH in english, in hebrew the letters are pronounced as Yodh Heh Waw Heh. So equipped with this information do you know how to CORRECTLY pronounce this God given name or NOT?
God HIMSELFwrote this name and spoke/UTTERED this name to Moses
Do you know how to pronounce YHWH? just answer the simple question & dont rant about the meanings
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation The blood of Messiah, Yeshua (Jesus), God's son, is what cleanses us from sin, not how we pronounce Jesus' name or the name given at the burning bush.
By the way, the name at bush was "Ehyeh", "I AM", not Yahweh, which is only what WE call God because we would not say, "I AM" (EHYEY), (that is, what God calls Himself), but rather, "He IS", that is, (YHWH). This proves that it is not how it is said, but what it means.
But, sorry to rant about what you are expert about!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
Please do not preach&rant just answer the questions
So YHWH is not the name of God the Father of the son Jesus UMMM! LOL
EHYEH is the name the unique name of God which means "I AM"
Try again!
Further you ascribe the pronunciation Yahweh to the word YHWH, would you place your faith on this as being correct?
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
Peace to you too. We will end it there!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@tyler18c Amen!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
Enosh's name means "A mortal man of?" That seems ridiculous.
thirtysilver 1 year ago
@thirtysilver Hebrew is not English. In Hebrew, the use of the construct "of" occurs simply when two nouns are joined together. There is no word in between. Thus, two names side by side can be in construct, thus the "of". (Enosh) "Mortal-man" --of--- (Kenan) "sorrow" = "Man of sorrow", but this word is different than what "Adam" means ("Man"). Enosh means "a man that can die", and thus, "Mortal Man" --- of --- "Sorrow". Semitic languages seem only strange to us, not to those that speak them!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Then Enosh does not literally mean "a mortal man of." That is an Anglicization, hmm? An imperfect translation means this part of the code may be deciphered incorrectly.
thirtysilver 1 year ago
@thirtysilver Yes it means, literally, "a mortal man", although perhaps it would have been better translated simply as "man" for the sake of simplicity. See my website for answers to many of your questions about the names bible code.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 , No it doesn't , lol ! mr. know it all , hah ! Adam in exact translation means " clay" , a red clay to be exact ! LOL OH LOL !
26mel1 1 year ago 2
@26mel1 Yes, but the way it is used in Genesis means "man". Otherwise, why do scholars debate the first five chapter of Genesis, if whether "ADAM" should be translated as "man" or as "Adam": (Example, Gen. 1:26-28; 5:1) . Example: Gen. 5:1, the Hebrew word "ADAM" is found twice, but the first time it is translated "Adam", while the second time it is translated "man". This happens again in 5:2. So, the bible itself tells us what it means. Good enough for me --- and the scholars apparently!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 go away mad person !
26mel1 1 year ago
@26mel1 Now, it is possible to say that ADAM means man, which is derived from the Hebrew word that means 'reddish ground'. I have no problem with that. But that does not effect the code. Adam means man and man means clay. But the bible itself uses several play on words in Genesis with the personal name of Adam to mean man in Genesis, and so why not the bible code also? So it is not that I disagree with you about the reddish clay, but of your insistence that it does not mean 'man' as well.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
Yes, the name Adam is related to the word for "clay" or "ground",
which is "Adamah" in Hebrew. But the word for "man" in Hebrew, which
is used hundreds of times in the bible, is spelled ADAM! Funny how in
Hebrew the word for man sounds EXACTLY the same as Adam!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@thirtysilver One thing, though, is that your comment made me to realize that i should have left out the nuance of meaning here and just left it at "man of sorrow" so as not to confuse anyone. I will omit it from my website, but the video is already there. It is not wrong, just added information that need not have been included.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
This PROVES beyond all shadow of doubt the divine inspiration of the Bible! Good thing that the lord and his father gave us this valuable information.
pabobfin 1 year ago
@pabobfin Yes it does. It is a sign first to the Jew, but also to the nations.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
But Jesus isn't of the lineage of Joseph. He was born of a virgin.
And secondly, according to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage. Sorry to say, this video is wrong. It sounds nice, but it just doesn't work.
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes you pawned them well... god bless you!
Alexandroslav 1 year ago
@Alexandroslav
Thank you very much. ^_^
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes Let us cut to the point. You are not saying the video is wrong, you are saying that Matthew is wrong since the video is essentially taken straight from it. How strange this sounds from someone who at the same time claims to believe in the virgin birth! I will not labor to answer your objections here, and we are limited to 500 characters anyway. But search the internet. Your objections are answered by many others more capable than myself. I believe God inspired Matthew!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
Did you even READ my comment? Let me put it simply. Matthew describes Joseph's lineage. Jesus was born of a virgin. Since Mary had a virgin birth, Joseph is not the father. Since Joseph is not Jesus' father, this lineage is not Jesus'. Get it? Or are you too stupid to believe that you're wrong, and you have to set up straw men arguments?
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes Mat 1:1 "This is a record of the birth of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
Mat 1:16 "Jacob fathered Joseph, the husband of Mary, who was the mother of Jesus, who is called the Christ.
Mat 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon were fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ were fourteen generations." The bible speaks for itself!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
DID YOU EVEN READ MY ARGUMENT? ARE YOU THAT DAFT?
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes For what purpose is Matthew's genealogy then, if not to show that Jesus lineage through Joseph was authentic, legally speaking? It matters not in the least whether Joseph was Jesus' physical father. He was his legal father according to inheritance rights and that is all that matters. Jesus was entitled to the throne of David, that is the point of Matthews genealogy. I know there are other theories, but to me that makes most sense. No matter what, the code is real.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 OK, since you don't get it, I'll say it a third time.
"He was his legal father according to inheritance rights and that is all that matters. Jesus was entitled to the throne of David, that is the point of Matthews genealogy."
I said, "According to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. "
So, by "law" Jesus WOULDN'T be entitled to the throne.
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 No offense Shekel777, you must read the Davidic Covenant in 2 Samuel 7:1-17..This is a physical seed and blood covenant, NOT AN ADOPTION! They MUST issue from David's offspring's loins. Jesus doesn't quality, sorry!
Shalom Aleichem!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah That's the point. Jesus comes from the line of David, BOTH through Mary and Joseph, his legal father. This way, technically, Jesus is not the flesh descendant of Coniah, and thus the prophecy is undisturbed. Yet, it is still the legal lineage of Jesus no matter what you say. Jesus descended from Coniah through Joseph, his step father, but through his mother by-passed Coniah. The names code follows the legal ancestry of Jesus. If in your mind this disqualifies Yeshua from this honor?
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 LOL! Please READ the Davidic Covenant! There is not such person coming from the LOINS of David born of a "holy spirit." That's Greek Mysticism my friend! READ MY LIPS: IT TAKES A PHYSICAL SEED, I.E. SPERM OF A MAN TO FULFILL THE DAVIDIC COVENANT! NO WAY AROUND IT! Don't spiritualize something that is meant to be physical! Bad "hermeneutics!"
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@777Shekel777
LOL
God jesus has a legal father joseph
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@TruthIsSalvation This is only laughable if you deny the most basic of Christian beliefs, that is that Jesus was both full God and fully man. As a man, Jesus' father was legally Joseph, but not by birth through Joseph because Jesus was born of a virgin. If you deny this then you are a heretic, plain and simple.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah
since Jewish lineage is derived from Yeshua mother Mariam, read the other lineage in Luke, one lineage is legal, one lineage is blood.
Shalom Isa al Masa is the only true Prophet & Messiah.
lusem09 1 year ago
@lusem09 That's all well n good for the NT but it doesn't line up with Torah! He still doesn't qualify to be a Moshiach!! Read the Davidic Covenant! The Moshiach will have sons to pass the throne too...from my understanding of NT, Yeshua died childless! AND please, spare me the spiritual aspect of his death! That doesn't line up with the promise either! We don't know who the Moshiach is yet until the Most High reveals it!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah , the bloodline of Yeshua & Mary of Magdal was covered up by the church , so He is the Messiah as you keep stating the Messiah had children .
26mel1 1 year ago
@26mel1 Covered up by the church? So tell me my friend, have u ever read the requirements for being King from the Torah? READ Deut 17:14-20 and let me know if Yeshua fit this description for being King over Yisraal. AND, if your theory is right, then tell me why his throne was NEVER perpetuated by his sons that he had from Mary of Magdalla? He was and is no moshiach!!! He was hung on a tree which is a sign of being cursed according to Torah.
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tzephaniyah , your choice to be blind , hah !
26mel1 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Jesus the Messiah absolutely fit that description. He obeyed the Father unto death. He turned neither to the right nor the left. He laid down His life for His brethren, but what you must understand is that His Kingdom has not come yet, but when it does, it will fill the whole earth. As for your question about where in the old testament does it state that Messiah must die, read Is 53- whole chapter. Also Father and son are one, so Immanuel (God with us) laid down His life.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 Jesus never had children! That is a lie. He did not live His life as others. All of his life, since He was a child he studies the scriptures and taught them. He was a rabbi and taught in the synagogues. His whole 33 years were about doing His Father's will. He did not marry nor have children. It might interest you to know that I was born a literal jew and raised jewish. I have believed since I was a child that Jesus is the Son of God.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 So it isn't just "you chistians", as you put it, who believe.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@26mel1 The DaVinci Code is nonsense, which is where you are getting this stuff. The genealogy in Matthew and Luke is the true genealogy of Jesus, and it ends with Jesus, who had no physical heir, only "sons" in the non literal sense.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 , it's your choice to be blind , eh !
26mel1 1 year ago
@26mel1 As you say, "We must all stand before the judgement seat of Christ and give an account for the deeds done while here on this earth."
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 , & Yeshua said : forgive them Father for (shekel777) doesn't know of what he's doing !
26mel1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@777Shekel777
"Jesus, who had no physical heir, only "sons" in the non literal sense."
taking this logic to its conclusion
"GOD YHWH who has no physical heir, only "son/sons" in the none literal sense."
It is possible for Jesus, being a physical being/man, to have physical sons. The same can not be said about YHWH God
TruthIsSalvation 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah You have stated the answer to your own question, but it obviously is not satisfactory to you. All who have faith in Yeshua (Jesus) the Messiah are the "seed" of Messiah. There are those who are the physical seed of Abraham and there are those who have the faith of Abraham, of both Jews and the nations. May you find Yeshua the Messiah, the savior of all men.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Can you PLEASE show me from the Hebrew scriptures where the Messiah is SUPPOSE to be the savior of all men? THERE IS NO PROPHECY REGARDING THE MOSHIACH THAT SUGGESTS SUCH A THING! A man CANNOT save you from sin!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah That's a big question for so little space! How about Isa. 9:6.
"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be unpon His shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end..." etc.
"NO END". Sounds like an ever expanding dominion affecting all men. And, who is this "Mighty God" born to sit on David's thone?
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 LOL!!! Let me quote this passage from the Hebrew script: " For a child HAS BEEN born to us, a son HAS BEEN given to us, and the dominion will rest on his shoulder; the Wondrous Adviser, Mighty Elohym, Eternal Father, called his name Sar-Shalom (prince of peace)" This is the correct understanding of this passage my friend. NOTICED the past tensed usage HAS BEEN. The child was ALREADY born when the prophet spoke these words.He was referring to King Hezekiah 2Kings 18-20;2chro 29
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah So all the translations are wrong! However, it is common knowledge that most prophecy is written in the prophetic future tense.
And "Elohim" is simply Hebrew for "God", which still begs the question: "Who is this Mighty God/Elohim that is born? -- Even if past tense as you insist. Is Hezekiah God?
It says: "Of the increase of his government and of peace there shall be no end..." Not true of Hezekiah. The kings of Judah had their end in 586 BC, but the prophecy says, "No end".
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 If you are going to study the Hebrew script, then you MUST get your head out of the English. The word Elohim DOESN'T mean "god" is Hebrew. It's translated either "powers" or "mighty ones." Did you know that Mosheh was called an Elohim? Read Exodus 7:1. AND if you read the Davidic covenant u will notice that the Most High told David that his kingdom will not end. so it hasn't ended, just postponed until the restoration of all things take place. Hezekiah was just a part of that..
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah I am very busy the next 5 days and so will have to get back to you about your three comments.
But quickly, as far as Moses being called Elohim, well, that's the point. Moses will be like God to Pharaoh and Aaron like his prophet. Yes, it is possible that it can be translated as, "I will make you mighty to Pharaoh..., but that would rather weaken the point, would it not? The context favors the normal translation of "God", and thus it is almost universally translated as such.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah By the way, "Elohim" is almost always translated as God, and to a lesser extent, gods, but only a very few times, mighty (or mighty ones, rulers, angels). As I am sure you know, Elohim is in the plural because it is the plural of majesty. Nor is the definite article "ha" always necessary to translate it "God".
But back to Isa. 9, " אל גבור" It would be redundant to say: "Mighty Powerful". How much more simple to translate "EL" as God, "Mighty God"! This followed by "Everlasting."
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 very simply my friend, look up the meaning of the name Hezekiah and it will give u that understanding. Again, what would make u think this is talking abt Jesus when this passage in it's context is for the ppl of that time, not 500 years in the future! What sense does that make? how would that benefit the ppl of that time? NONE! so your argument is out of context! Futhermore, as important as u christians make jesus out to b, why isn't his name EVER mentioned in the Hebrew script?
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Prophecy often applies to the immediate situation, but also speaks beyond that into the far future as well. Tell me how you can read Isaiah and not come away with that sense?
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Continued: The Most High never had a problem mentioning ne of his key servant's names b4 they were even born. 4 example, King Yosiah, Samsom, etc. He even goes to the extent of mentioning a non-Israelite 150 years b4 his birth (CYRUS)! Now, if he is wiling to do this for a non-Israelite, then he wouldn't had ne trouble CLEARLY mentioning the so-called SAVIOR OF MANKIND! It just doesn't line up with the consistent pattern of the Most High's thoughts throughout the Hebrew Script!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Mat. 1:21 “And she shall bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name JESUS; for it is he that shall save his people from their sins.”
While the name “Yeshua” is not explicitly given, the Gospel of Matthew is correct to say that what his name means encapsulates the hopes and desires of everything expressed in the entire bible. But God did not predict the actual name of Messiah, otherwise, you tell me his name since you believe that Messiah is still to come?
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 That's the whole point my friend, the Most High didn't give us THE name of the messiah b/c there will NOT just b ONE anointed one. All anointed ones will die and pass their kingship to their sons and to there sons; so forth n so on! Get the picture? NO ONE COMING TO DIE FOR SINS! YOU R RESPONSIBLE 4 UR OWN SINS!! Furthermore, if I'm going to believe Matt 1:21 then what about Matt 1:23. It says his name shall b emmanuel. Which one is it. Many contradictions in the NT! Not reliable
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Emmanuel is what he is called in the sense of what the name means, "God with us". Jesus was indeed called, "The Son of God", and in that sense, "God with us".
Your view on many messiah's is just one view among rabbis, and the wrong one I might add. Isaiah 53 shows that Messiah will both suffer and be glorified afterward, as do other prophecies. Not two messiahs, but one. Yeshua is your Messiah, the Lamb of God who took away the sins of the whole world.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Oh I bet He did!!
watch this very short vid and see on the topic of Proverbs 30:4 - Jesus' name is there
type "ray bentley" on youtube search bar and watch the 2nd video with Mark Blitz. Tell me what do you think..
lucky258i 1 year ago
@lucky258i I checked out ur guy Mark Blitz n I marvel how he uses the Hebrew Alef/bet to paint a false picture of this Yeshua character. The name Yeshua in Hebrew is NEVER depicted as a person. It simply means salvation. In Gen 1:1 the house that he is referring too is the house for adam, who was a son. Guess where he placed his son? In the Garden! So the only way the son can get back into the house is thru Yeshua, i.e. TORAH! Psa 19:7 The Law of Yahowah is perfect, converting the soul..."
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah I'm still waiting for someone to explain Debarim 24:16 to me! I've ask this question in this venue for over a month now but it's being avoided like the N1H1 vaccine, LOL! but in all seriousness, I respect each person in this forum eventhough we may differ in doctrine but I will NEVER bash a person b/c he or she is a precious soul! I ONLY come against an ideology/philosophy that has been handed down to all of us! Shalom aleichem to you my friend!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@lucky258i Don't b marveled by the trickery of man's wisdom but always reproof the scriptures by how the Creator thoughts n designs. He will NOT violate his design! It's amazing how individuals try to come up with their own theory to try n insert their own thoughts into the Hbbrew script. Why is it that this Jesus character is so clandestine in the Hebrew script that one needs high powered binoculars to find him but every other major character is plain as day light! SMH!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Yes, but if you take the original passage and look at it - it still will be there - that cross - even if Yeshua isn't a name but a meaning (salvation) then you must realize that the cross IS DRAWN and that is one of the many fingerprints God left to show that Jesus is the salvation in Torah - So my understanding is that Christ already came into the world. Jews don't need to wait for another one cause that one will be the Antichrist when the third temple will be built.
lucky258i 1 year ago
@lucky258i Keep in my, the cross symbol that it makes is referring to the hebrew letter TAV which looks like a cross. It means a sign or a mark. Salvation has already been granted to ALL mean through Torah. No one needs to die for ne one. Mosheh couldn't do it when he tried. Also, in studying the coming of the moshiach in hebrew, where does it show that he will come 2 times? Where does it CLEARLY show he will die for sins? Where does it say THUS SAITH YAH IN THE NEW TEST? Does Yah tell ne man...
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@lucky258i to write anything in the NT? Does the Hebrew script CLEARLY show that the Moshiach would die on a roman crux? Does the Hebrew Script CLEARLY show that the Moshiach would rise from the grave after 3 days? Does the Hebrew Script show CLEARLY that the Moshiach would go back to heaven n come back down again to set up his "earthly" kingdom? Please answer these simple questions for me!!!!!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah To me The Old Testament/Torah is filled with prophecies about Jesus - and they happened precisely what the prophets said - The New Testament says that God put a vail over His peoples eyes so they wouldn't know the time of His coming. That was His plan to save the gentiles too. Question - why where Jews obligated to make sacrifices?.. if God doesn't need a ransom for sins and all He needs is the law - why make sacrifices? To me, the sacrifices pointed towards Jesus as a sacrifice..
lucky258i 1 year ago
@lucky258i So now we have the Scriptures according to Lucky! LOL! My friend, if u never were introduced to NT first, u wouldn't come to these conclusions. It's called circular reasoning. Yah never said he put a vail over his ppl's eyes! Yisraal knew exactly what their punishment would b for serving strange gods. Yah told them precisely what would happen to them. He told them that they would b by-word n a proverb, i.e loss of identity b/c of them being scattered. but he promised to revive...
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@lucky258i us unto himself again! Blood sacrifices were not the only way to atone for sins. Read Ps 51 n u will c tht David only needed to REPENT from his sins. not offer up a bull. Read Hosea 14:1-3. This is when Yisraal was in the land of their captivity and what did they use for forgiveness of sins? READ IT N C. These are things the church don't teach. They sway ur mind to believe a certain way. They take scripture out of context n form a pretext!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah You're not looking for him, he's all through the Torah. The Torah was written on Lambs skin, Yeshua is the Lamb of God, he's the Torah made Flesh. After his death, the temple was destroyed and there is no need for anymore sacrifices. His blood atoned for your sins. Yes, a veil is upon many Jewish eyes, read Romans 11:25-29. Explain to me though,when you get your temple built, who will be clean and pure enough to be the High Priests? God alone made Aaron the High Priest. Who now?
juniemoon 1 year ago
@juniemoon Please show my ONE Hebrew script that even remotely comes close to saying Yeshua is the "lamb of Yah?" Human blood CANNOT atone for ne sins. Human sacrifice is an abomination to YHWH. Read the Hebrew script carefully my friend, blood wasn't the only way to atone 4 sins. Wen the temple is rebuilt he will select 4 himself priests Isa 61:6; 66:21. Clean n pure doesn't have a thing to do with being sinless! Ur missing the point! Aaron wasn't sinless!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
Furthermore, these r "end time" passages which hasn't come to pass yet. If your Yeshua is THE HIGH PRIEST of YAH, then why would YHWH select priests and Levites in that day 4 himself? PLEASE EXPLAIN! Let me ask u a question, if blood was the only way to atone 4 sins, then please explain Hos 14:1,2. The 10 tribes were in captivity in the north where there were NO SACRIFICES being made. How were their sins forgiven? I await ur response!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 Yes, most prophecies are written in that sense but within the context of the time period given. For example, one cannot take Isa 7:14 and says it is speaking of Jesus 500 years in the future when the sign was for King Ahaz. furthermore, if Isa 9:6 was speaking of Jesus, then where is his everlasting kingdom? Please show me any hebrew script that even HINTS at the fact that the messiah was coming to die for our sins..PLEASE! I BEG YOU!!! Deut 24:16. Please explain this verse to me!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 If you NEVER were introduced to the NT, you would have NEVER come to the conclusions about the Messiah, which is NOT just ONE person but many, that you have been taught by the western thinking scholars. If you READ the entire contexts of the prophecies concerning the anointed ones, u will see that they will be married and have sons that will take over after they die, thus a kingdom without END! There is much u have to unlearn my friend. Keep seeking n u will find truth! Shalom!!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Past tense because God is Almighty God and knows His plan. It was established since the foundation of the world. According to scriptures, the kingdom of the Messiah will fill the whole earth and there will be no end to it. Hezekia's reign ended. How can you, if you just read the scriptures, believe the passage is about Hezekiah?
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 What makes u think this passage is talking abt Jesus? This passage predated Jesus some 500 years. What sense would it make for this to be talking abt some 1 coming 500 years down the road when the ppl needed political deliverance @ that time? True, hezekiah's reign ended but the throne of David hasn't. Hezekiah was jst a piece of the puzzle like solomon and the rest of the kings were! All Messiah's (anointed Ones) die! They don't live forever. That's why we have the David covenant
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah God did not predict the actual name of Messiah, otherwise, you tell me his name since you believe that Messiah is still to come? Are you saying that God is unwise to not name him at all, or just unwise if Yeshua is that Messiah? Either way you are saying that you are wiser than God.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 I'm not saying I'm wiser than Yah! All I'm saying 2 u is that u are using circular reasoning n arguments from silence to prove something that is not there! Your textual criticism lacks basic hermeneutical skills when it comes to the Hebrew Script. BTW: the "us" in Gen 1:26 is found in Prov chapter 8 the entire chapter but focus on vs 22-end. That will give u the "us" U WILL NEVER SEE YAH MENTION "ME N MY SON" in the Hebrew Script. Everything with ur jesus is covert! its not clear!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Ok. You are not saying you are wiser. But speaking of names and Proverbs, can you answer this one? מה־שׁמו ,ומה־שׁם־בנו
Proverbs 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, and descended? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? Who hath bound the waters in his garment? Who hath established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is his son's name, if thou knowest?
Such hints about Messiah are found throughout the bible. Hidden, yes, but still there.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 LOL! Why is it that Jesus is always portrayed in a clandestine way in the Hebrew Script? It amazing that most major events r pretty clear! Ne way, to answer your question for Prov. 30:4 is very simple: R U READY? Exo 4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith Yahowah, Israel is MY SON, even my firstborn:
Exo 4:23 And I say unto thee, Let my SON go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn.
NUFF SAID!!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah Interesting take on that, but the reference to "ascending and descending" from heaven to earth must at least make you wonder?
Surely, this is more than a mere hint that God was descend as man to earth and that the seed of Eve will "bruise the serpents head", as per the first prophecy recorded in the bible. Yeshua is that "Seed", come forth through Abraham and David, and will one day finish what He started by casting the serpent, the devil, into the lake of fire.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY!
Deu 4:14 And Yah commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, that ye might do them in the land where ye go over to possess it.
Deu 4:15 Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of FORM on the day that YAH spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Deu 4:16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the FORM of any figure, the likeness of MALE or FEMALE." IS JESUS A MALE FIGURE
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah That's a good point, at least at face value, no pun intended.
But the bible (New Covenant) teaches that Yeshua was not a man before His birth, but that he existed as a member of the Trinity as a spirit being, just as God the father is. At the incarnation (that is, becoming flesh), Jesus remained God but was henceforth both fully God and fully Man. And so, there was no image of Yeshua (Jesus) as a man to make an idol of back then, nor should we make images "to bow down to" today.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah God came down in flesh and laid down his life for the whole worldl. Thus, by the shedding of His blood, sin can be forgiven through Him.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 Maybe your God can do that but the Most High Yah in the Hebrew Script doesn't have to come down to give his life. He is the creator, we r his creation. That statement is blasphemous! If that were the case, why didn't he come down at the initial fall of man and died then? At least it would have given all of us the opportunity not to fall or sin ourselves. You r thinking just like a Greek minded person. He is the most high of equal weights and balances.
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah The scriptures tell us He came down at the appropriate time that He chose. He sent His Son to shed his own blood so that the world could receive forgiveness of sins if they followed Him with all of their heart. For the blood of bulls and goats, etc. can never take away sin. That was to point the true way of forgiveness of sins which is through the shedding of Jesus' blood who is the Son of God. Otherwise, this world which is swallowed up in evil, would have no hope.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 U christians never cease to amaze me with ur contradictions..supra..u said, God came down in flesh and laid down his life for the whole world." but her u said, "He sent his son to shed his own blood so that the world could receive forgiveness of sins.." So which one is it, God or his son came down? and which Hebrew Script that says that clearly! PLEASE SHARE! U still didn't answer my question above!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah As the name's code begins by saying, which is what all Christians believe, "The God-Man shall come down..." Yeshua (Jesus) is both fully God and fully man.
But let me ask you a question. Who is the "us" and "our" in this and other passages like it?
Gen 1:26 And Elohim said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness;
Gen 11:7 Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. And Jehovah scattered them thence...
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 There is NO SUCH CONCEPT as a god/man. That is Greek mythology my friend! You've been watching Clash of the Titans too much! LOL! When one tries to bring Greek thought into Hebrew thought, one has the tendency to distort the true essence of the language. YAH CANNOT n WILL NOT BECOME A MAN! Job 9:32
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 What of pile of brainwashed crap. You mean the boudhists, have no hope ? You mean 4 billion people( who don`t believe in Christ) on earth, have no hope ?
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon God is just to reveal himself to whoever searches for him. But Jesus is still the only name by which men can be saved.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@777Shekel777 Tell that to the 4 billion people on earth, who don`t believe in him.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 He would have had to give the people of the so-called Old Testament the same opportunity! So if your paradigm is correct, then the people of the "OT" were doomed! Is this your premise? If not, then explain to me how they were able to make it without someone dying for their sins?
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@Tzephaniyah He has. Have you not heard of abraham's bosom? The people in old testament, such as all of the true prophets and those who truly obeyed Almighty God with all of their hearts are waiting to be resurrected along with the true followers of Almighty God at the resurrection. We are all one, those who follow and seek Him with all of their heart. We will all be one at the time of Jesus' Return.
msmelancholy1 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 More brainwashed nonsense.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 Can u please show me where ne 1 is waiting in some so-called Abrahom's bosom? Again, this is Greek theology not Hebrew! U r using arguments from silence that have no bearing on Hebrew thought or culture. Abraham was buried in the cave of machpelah. there is no RESURRECTION of the dead, lol! as u call it. No one is going to be popping out of graves. Again, that's Greek thinking my friend!
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@msmelancholy1 Furthermore, if the Most High Yah would come down in the flesh n die, he would cease to be the Creator of the universe. He doesn't have to do that, he's already made provision within all of us to make the right choices in life...PLEASE READ GEN. 4:6-7. After reading this, tell me if the Most High had to come down and die for Cain in order for him to be cleansed of his sin? If not, then what did the Most High tell Cain?
Tzephaniyah 1 year ago
@lusem09 Yes, this is what I would conclude.
Shalom!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes I fail to see your point. The Matthew genealogy is in the bible and is said to be Christ's, even if it is traced through Jesus' stepfather Joseph. It is still the legal line of descent and recorded for us by the Holy
Spirit. So why are you diminishing it's importance?
777Shekel777 1 year ago
@777Shekel777 I thought you'd bring up that point, hence "And secondly, according to the prophecy of Jeremiah 22:28-30, there could be no king in Israel who was a descendant of King Jeconiah, and Matthew 1:12 relates that Joseph was from the line of Jeconiah. Jesus would have been of the cursed lineage."
So either this IS Jesus' genealogy, which means, according to the Bible, means he can't be king, or it isn't his genealogy, which means this video is wrong. I think you're wrong, not the Bible
MegaCalvinHobbes 1 year ago
@MegaCalvinHobbes Mat 1:1 "This is a record of the birth of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
Mat 1:16 "Jacob fathered Joseph, the husband of Mary, who was the mother of Jesus, who is called the Christ.
Mat 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon were fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ were fourteen generations." The bible speaks for itself!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
This is VERY cool.
thelordschurch 1 year ago
@tuscani423 Hi! Every name is explained in detail. Only a few names are in doubt, and context helps. There is a note there about "Jacob" as referring to "Jacob" as a nation in the bible, also called "Israel". (See note for more, Youtube limits my length to explain here.) More often than not, names with multiple meanings only add to the code because either way reads well, a kind of play on words, thus revealing more complexity, not less.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
See my website at bible-codes org for more information.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
I'm just wondering why at first it says that Jacob means outwits his enemy....but at the end it says Jacob means Jacob. I would love to say that this video is legit as a Christian, but If I can notice something like that, imagine what an atheist will notice. I've tried to look up from Adam to Noah, but we simply do not know for sure what some of the names mean, and others have multiple possibilities.
tuscani423 1 year ago
@tuscani423 Hi! Every name is explained in detail. Only a few names are in doubt, and context helps. There is a note there about "Jacob" as referring to "Jacob" as a nation in the bible, also called "Israel". (See note for more, Youtube limits my length to explain here.) More often than not, names with multiple meanings only add to the code because either way reads well, a kind of play on words, thus revealing more complexity, not less.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
awesome,thanks for that experience!
koolkat33746 1 year ago
One part of this lineage can be found in the gospel of Matthew, but there is a different lineage in the gospel of Luke.
CabukMustafa 1 year ago
@CabukMustafa --- Yes, this is what makes the code so remarkable. The names in Luke's genealogy do not read as anything at all. I have tried. This does not mean that the genealogy in Luke's gospel unauthentic, rather, it has it's own purpose, and a 'names bible code' is not it. But what it does show is how difficult and unusual it is for the names code to exist at all. In other words, this is not something easily reproduced by randomness, otherwise any genealogy would do.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
This is so wonderful!!!
johndeweb 1 year ago
This is WRONG. Moses did not have King David in his lineage. LOL at you.
If you want real codes just go to my site.
BringersOfTruth 1 year ago
Yes, David did not come from the lineage of Moses, and I explain that in a note in the video itself, and more thoroughly in my website. I also state that the names code reads just as well without the addition of the names to do with Moses, but also that it was clear to me that these additional names were intended to be added as again explained in the note. You should not be so hasty to comment without getting your facts straight first. The LOL is on you, not me.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
Even more surprising is that once you get to Abraham, the rest of the names all the way to Jesus Christ are relatively easily strung together, and the meanings of the names much less uncertain.
In other words, the first 20 names are the hardest, but after that the next 60 are easy.
So why it was not fully discovered earlier? This is the real mystery. Same for the acrostic: For 40 centuries, rabbis and scholars poured over this early genealogy but did not notice it! That's the real miracle!
777Shekel777 1 year ago
you draw native hopi secret holy site.i know, i am your shadow
drhoecker 1 year ago
My comment was not meant to be funny, but I suppose it could be construed as such!
Anyway, the acrostic code itself is certainly no joke, but a powerful message embedded in the bible, apparently there for about 4000 years, staring thousands of scholars in the face and yet no one, that I know of, every noticed it. This is the real miracle of the acrostic bible code -- why no one noticed it before. We are talking about something that has been studied forward and backward over thousands of years.
777Shekel777 1 year ago
I loled...this was meant as a joke right?
ChaosmanOne 1 year ago
And thank you for your encouragement!
I needed that!
777Shekel777 1 year ago