University of Oklahoma Boss David Boren Caught Having a "Queer Moment"

[bigt7070]

Fondling is to stroke or caress lovingly. I didn't see anything after 1:09 that displays "love" in more than a friendship way. Don't you think he would have touched a little lower if he meant it more in a sexual way? I'm not saying Boren isn't gay, because I don't know the guy, but I do not believe Boren was caught in a queer moment like the title says.

[MichaelPhillipWright]

It is a FACT that Boren is queer. He shouldn't be called "gay," though, since "gay" means out of the closet. Boren still pretends to be straight. See my video "Gay Activists Outed U.S. Senator David Boren as Queer in 1993."

When a queer fondles another man, as Boren does in this video, you can be sure that he does it for queer reasons.

[bigt7070]

Thank you for the reply. Respectfully, I'm still not convinced about his sexuality at all. I don't discredit your evidence, but I'm one for seeing evidence first hand. And for me to be convinced, I'd have to also really care about whethere he's homosexual or not. Which brings me to the question, why is it important for everybody to know? I mean, is it really an issue that should be brought up? But either way, I don't believe this video itself provides credible evidence that Boren is queer.

[MichaelPhillipWright]

I have to keep spoon-feeding it to you people. In my text box, click on the link to the video about the gay literature. In that text box, there is a link to some scans of the literature. One example comes from the book by W. Scott Thompson, who was a member of Boren's Rhodes Scholar class. Boren was openly queer at Oxford and Thompson confirms it in unambiguous terms. You Boren defenders keep overlooking the fact that Boren is guilty of SEXUAL HARASSMENT and corrupt hiring practices.

[bigt7070]

Firstly, you avoided my question. You don't have to be homosexual to be guilty of sexual harassment, if that is what you're getting at. Why is it important to know he's in the closet? His sexuality is the least of my concerns. Secondly, your calling me a Boren defender is unjust and offensive, considering your hate for him. I'm pretty sure he's as crooked as the next politician, but just because I'd prefer first hand evidence over a book by somebody I don't know doesn't make me a fan of Boren's.

[MichaelPhillipWright]

You ARE a Boren-lover and you just won't give up. The gays outed him as queer in 1993 and him cited his record of sexually harassing males. I keep telling you to see my video about the gay literature but you keep avoiding it. You want some "first-hand" evidence, you say? Just go see Boren and drop your pants for him and he'll give you the evidence. If you don't believe W. Scott Thompson, then just go out in public and call him a liar and see what happens, Boren-lover

[SoonerinCollege]

I know much has been said about Boren's sexuality. However, this is a bit of a stretch. He simply put his hand on another man's shoulder. No fondling here.

[MichaelPhillipWright]

To see the big picture, read my comments in the text box. With 2 years left on his 3rd term, Boren resigned from the U.S. Senate in 1994. In '93 the gays had begun to out him. See my video displaying some of the gay literature. In 1995, former Rhodes Scholar W. Scott Thompson, who knew Boren at Oxford, confirmed his gayness in the book The Price of Achievement. Boren is guilty of sexual harassment and of stuffing government payrolls with men who appeal to him. Fondling men is in Boren's nature.