This won't happen, fundamentally we don't have the ability to fully understand our brains, with only our brains to understand them with. Its a paradox, an impossibility due to the fundamental nature of living things, good luck IBM but its a waste of money.
What is wrong with the interviewer? His dumb comments have completely spoiled a good opportunity to learn about the project from an IBM engineer. Does this guy have any idea that it is possible to zoom out rather than move it up and down all the time. And what is up with all the shaking of the camera?
17:45 The whole concept is wrong. They are wasting money. What do you expect from a person that has only processors, and algorithms in his head.
The correct way is through a new type of neural networks that grow as tree/fractal and is based on the following rule: "Look for differences in what appear identical and Look for similarities in what appear different."(c). This is the evolutionary approach of the bio-neural systems.
Is the plane a model of a bird?No, but it flies.The brain is not a bird
There are many clever people out in the world. Many of them write books, lecture, do projects, etc. They all appear to fit in your category of " ...scientists and many respected associated scientists".
And yet, Despite all the brain power they have only few of them come up with new and original ideas.
Just listen to what he says. It does not sound any different from what we hear for decades about AI.
He wants to make chip with parallel architecture at synapse level. Where is AI here?
@gespilk taking things out of context is fun isn't it? If you had watched any of the other videos then you would have seen that they described it in a very similar way as you. no the brain is not a bird but a bird has 75% of the same DNA as a human and has very similar brain function, besides he was using birds to equate the computing power to something tangible. also we have been stuck in von nueman style cpu's for far too long and any new architecture, especially one modeled after the most
A rat "brain" simulation on a super computer...It means they got is completely wrong.
I say,All visible matter in the Universe is only about 5% and we happen to be in one of those spots in the Universe where there is more of it but not that much. It is so because complexity happens in the "inbetweens" where there is not too much of one thing/energy/power or another thing and there are cycles of a sort but not too violent/extreme or too weak/settled.
all they're going to do with this shit is turn it against ppl on the internet, spy on everyhing people say and use it to threaten sites and people who express adverse opinions. then, god forbid that they integrate this all with the physical word.
I think intelligence can prove useful in several areas!
:)
andenandenia 4 months ago
its simply great
newdigits 5 months ago
This won't happen, fundamentally we don't have the ability to fully understand our brains, with only our brains to understand them with. Its a paradox, an impossibility due to the fundamental nature of living things, good luck IBM but its a waste of money.
adickel9 5 months ago
@adickel9 The supposed paradox you describe is not a scientific fact. At best, it is a philosophical conjecture.
lesmiralha 1 month ago
"Two extremes of the human intellect"
cerberusdest 6 months ago
dharmendra modha.....IIT Bombay \m/
adityadd 6 months ago
What is wrong with the interviewer? His dumb comments have completely spoiled a good opportunity to learn about the project from an IBM engineer. Does this guy have any idea that it is possible to zoom out rather than move it up and down all the time. And what is up with all the shaking of the camera?
aproob 6 months ago 3
Buy IBM Stock...
LBNANY 1 year ago
17:45 The whole concept is wrong. They are wasting money. What do you expect from a person that has only processors, and algorithms in his head.
The correct way is through a new type of neural networks that grow as tree/fractal and is based on the following rule: "Look for differences in what appear identical and Look for similarities in what appear different."(c). This is the evolutionary approach of the bio-neural systems.
Is the plane a model of a bird?No, but it flies.The brain is not a bird
gespilk 1 year ago
@gespilk
yes.
and just what qualification do you have to back your statement up?
yes; ibm scientists and many respected associated scientists are involved in this project, where do you stand in this?
no wait don't tell me i'll tell you.
take this post an shove it where it'll hurt the most.
i'm sure you already know the place. it's probably taken a beak or two rofl
p0rtal00 1 year ago
@p0rtal00
There are many clever people out in the world. Many of them write books, lecture, do projects, etc. They all appear to fit in your category of " ...scientists and many respected associated scientists".
And yet, Despite all the brain power they have only few of them come up with new and original ideas.
Just listen to what he says. It does not sound any different from what we hear for decades about AI.
He wants to make chip with parallel architecture at synapse level. Where is AI here?
gespilk 1 year ago
@gespilk taking things out of context is fun isn't it? If you had watched any of the other videos then you would have seen that they described it in a very similar way as you. no the brain is not a bird but a bird has 75% of the same DNA as a human and has very similar brain function, besides he was using birds to equate the computing power to something tangible. also we have been stuck in von nueman style cpu's for far too long and any new architecture, especially one modeled after the most
nodoubtyamean 6 months ago
@nodoubtyamean powerful computing device we know of, is a step in the right direction.
nodoubtyamean 6 months ago
@nodoubtyamean
A rat "brain" simulation on a super computer...It means they got is completely wrong.
I say,All visible matter in the Universe is only about 5% and we happen to be in one of those spots in the Universe where there is more of it but not that much. It is so because complexity happens in the "inbetweens" where there is not too much of one thing/energy/power or another thing and there are cycles of a sort but not too violent/extreme or too weak/settled.
THAT IS WHAT WE NEED TO MODEL.
gespilk 6 months ago
"Intelligent Business Machines" - 01:47
tmtyler 1 year ago
all they're going to do with this shit is turn it against ppl on the internet, spy on everyhing people say and use it to threaten sites and people who express adverse opinions. then, god forbid that they integrate this all with the physical word.
evil bastards. DAARPA and the NSA indeed.
MustNotRead 1 year ago
19:55 owned!
puationstation 2 years ago
what a load of BS. the guy is a software programmer. what does he know about the brain?
davidgreen2020 2 years ago
@davidgreen2020 LOL... great! it's amazing how ignorant you can be :)
puationstation 2 years ago
whats ur problem? the interviewer is very natural and he asks good questions in my opinion...i mean, u could ask thousands of questions
what should we expect, a stereotype passive guy that reads questions from a paper?
Great job and many thanks
Serpico261 2 years ago 3
This interviewer is really quite bad.
breandanwang 2 years ago
And I mean really, really terrible.
breandanwang 2 years ago
you got that right - sounds like he's some dude in flip-flops
JohnIdol6 2 years ago
I wonder how did he get in there in the first place
JohnIdol6 2 years ago