1080p: Jaguar XFR vs Mercedes S63 AMG: GTBOARD.com

[dilatom]

who cares... therfore the Mercedes has probably the higher values consumption, weight, price, maintaince costs, market share, .... did I already said price?

[AnonymousMillionair3]

This made me laugh!

[PoorIllyrian]

BRING THE M5 OR M6 IN PLS !!!

[abdoelfarhan]

I find this hard to believe. Maybe the Jaguar is tuned or something. The S63 is much more powerful than the Jaguar, and for the comparison to be fair, XJ Supecharged should replace the XFR, or a lighter E63 AMG would replace the S63.

Anyways, that does not change our views on both brands. Mercedes eats Jaguar for breakfast all the time without doubts. End of story...

[pikemancolley]

@abdoelfarhan jaguar has a trophy cabinet that says otherwise dude

[cybershotty]

@abdoelfarhan Much more powerful?15hp is much more powerful,i see.. +s63 is 100kg heavier.I don't know what to think here,maybe only that you confused s63 with s65.Because s63 is no match for XFR.

[dkncsmedia]

Mercedes have beast cars but they do not make noise =/

[fadyberlon]

not a fair comparison, XFR should vs the E63 .. XJR is the one who should vs the S63

[Maserv8lover]

Jaguar XFR vs Maserati grantourismo MC stradale

[razor281]

is this vid stock vs stock? the e63 beat the jag in comparisons yet the s63 loose hmm?

[GdRoock]

@razor281 Same engine in the E63 and S63, but S63 is heavier. Try the S65. Daaaaaamn the jaaaag would loose. ^^

[razor281]

@GdRoock lol haha true true

[g35sedandriver]

Not what I expected!! Wow is the jag that fast? That it beats a 6.2 liter Benz??

[marra001]

lets see sl65 amg bi turbo :D

[dizzylizzy124]

Dont knock the Jag lads, its better than you think ;0)

[4spdk]

the Mercedes is better, sorry!! But I'll have the S klasse even with that 4 cylinder diesel engine, 204 hp. This car is brilliant!!!

[GalacticoAR]

i'm feelin a lot of jag hatred here man, damn

[B16SAF]

MERcs forever



[CarandArt]

an S 65 AMG will fuck the shit out of that Jag.

[ottooke007]

@CarandArt Yeah, but the S65 is a V12, and that wouldn't be fair :)

[CarandArt]

@ottooke007 The Benz has 6liter not even this is fair

[SMB67T]

@CarandArt

Actually the S63 alr can win...

[DigimonSuperFan]

Omg these fuckin faggots purposefully made the merc lose!!! This Is some shirt jag promo vid these guys put together. If this were a legit comparison the merc would had killed the jag. Annnd there is no way the s-class was being floored because that bitch would break ur ears.

[wiigamer136]

JAG FTW!!!

[heyybii]

@wiigamer136 thank you!! somebody who knows thier cars.. unlike the rest of the faggots on here

[SMB67T]

@heyybii

For goodness sake, do you actually know about cars? The S63 AMG simply wins the XFR.

[heyybii]

@SMB67T lol thats why it just lost right?? and trust me pal i know my cars.. i know a hell of alot more then you.. go try me

[SMB67T]

@heyybii

Hahaha. This is not always accurate I can tell you. Sometimes they're biased.

[tibidum]

you can't compare this 2 cars , u can compare the E 63 Amg with the XFR , not the S classe !!!!!!!

[arabadel]

all you guys are fuckin dumb that ant no amg

[asadkhanduh]

too bad the xfr is still shitty in comparison witht he s63 amg

not to mention more than one hundred thousand dollars less

[LukeNAESA10]

@asadkhanduh Yeah I'd never pay that amount of money for that peice of shit Mercedes when I can get the XFR.

[LukeNAESA10]

All I have to say about this video is, good luck to this so called "S63" when the new XJ-R comes out. I'd be surprised if the 0-60 is under 3.5 seconds on that one.

[ChillMood11]

Merc has lost so much touch on building cars. Their new aim is providing you with ass massage's and cold cup holders. Their engines are so over priced for what they offer and I'm not even a Jaguar lover but I would take Jaguar anyday over the merc.

[snapnrool]

@ChillMood11 I dunno man, yes the AMG engines are normally pretty rudimentary, but the new CLS has become a pretty fuel efficient vehicle while simultaneously having a large amount of tq and hp. Similar situation goes for the new M class, 6.4 or so liters per 100 km....thats unheard of until now for a car of that size...

[ChillMood11]

@snapnrool The m156 engine is awesome in raw power and weight but fuel efficiency is hilarious at 16 mpg this engine is just overrated. I think its funny how Germans made fun of Americas LS V8 6.2 liter found in most Chevy Camaros and trucks saying it was inefficient and was to much displacement. Now they go and make a 6.2 liter that has less MPG than ours and calls ground breaking hmmmm? Mercedes likes to make fun of our V8's but they go ahead and make one?

[snapnrool]

@ChillMood11 The prime difference between the German and US automakers is the engine options. Daimler offers a variety of diesel and gasoline engines, and 2 AMG engines while the US automakers usually stick with larger gasoline engines, even in Europe, which is really a shame because they would be much more successful if diesel engines were offered. I wasn't talking about the AMG engines.

[ChillMood11]

@snapnrool We are currently offering 4 cyl, V6's, Hybrids and now Hydrogen. We had bad habits back in the day of not using good engines in our smaller vehicles but people love V8's and the word V8 it screams Americana. What engine were you talking about then? So far Mercedes has yet to show me anything awesome in daily driver cars except paint jobs, rims, leather, touch screens and a huge ugly emblem on the grill.

[snapnrool]

@ChillMood11 IMO the C-Class is an excellent daily driver...Especially the diesel versions, which unfortunately aren't offered in the US. No idea what Mercedes Benz vehicles you have been looking at...And the AMG engine i was talking about is the 5.5 liter V8 offered in the CLS 63 AMG and the new E63 AMG. Neither of these vehicles are prime daily drivers, but are coming ever closer being more economical while simultaneously maintaining high performance: The goal of any car.

[snapnrool]

@ChillMood11 /watch?v=wadfmpaTOOs a comprehensive review of the new CLS 63 AMG with plenty reasons why i think it is an excellent daily driver and currently one of the best cars for sale, check it out.

[Julik1]

qwnage damn

[Thegamerboy7997]

why oh why did you have the barley interior?!

[LukeNAESA10]

I would still buy the XFR over the E-Class and the XJ Supersport over this lanky ugly pile of junk.

[LazBro123]

@LukeNAESA10 AGREED :)

[LazBro123]

@LukeNAESA10 And the XKR over the SL

[LukeNAESA10]

@LazBro123 Yep.

[Pitos07]

The S63 AMG is a 5.5L V8 Twin turbo, that puts 536hp, it's a completely different engine than what's in the C63 AMG... check AMG website before laying theories of why it lost... coz it's N/A etc..

[biatsch101]

@Pitos07 the 5.5l twin turbo is brand new and only for the 2011 s-class!!! in the video it's an older one, so it has the 6.2l engine

[MrSoccernugget]

its the fastest jaguar put it up against the fastest merc s65

[GalacticoAR]

supercharged vs n/a

[k2sb20033]

@GalacticoAR but 5.0L vs 6.3L

[GalacticoAR]

@k2sb20033 yeah, jags supercharged and the mercs naturally aspirated

[Pitos07]

@GalacticoAR S63 has a 5.5L twin-turbo, the C63 AMG has a 6.2L, S63 doesn't, check Mercs website!

[GalacticoAR]

@Pitos07 I stand corrected, completely forgot about that new V8. But personally i find superchargers far more responsive than turbo's and n/a engines

[Pitos07]

@k2sb20033 S63 has a 5.5L twin-turbo, this is a different engine than what's in the C63 AMG, the C63 has a 6.2L

[TheCottonTop]

It's the battle of the cars for old rich dickless fuckers.

[dracula779]

i want Jaguar XFR vs S63 AMG(comfort)...i'm sure that Jaguar will win that one...lol

[SMB67T]

Jaguar Sucks. The S63 AMG can easily beat it.

[jcsrt8]

@SMB67T Sure didnt look that way in this video.

[SMB67T]

@jcsrt8

The S63 Driver doesn't know how to drive. For the fact is S63 AMG wins.

[steflotti105]

@SMB67T the xfr is very light compared to the s63..

[SMB67T]

@steflotti105

Ya light. But S63 have more BHP.

[rurmundo]

GO JAGUAR

[TheUberPlayboy]

Merc FTW

[snapnrool]

@TheUberPlayboy No, AMG FTW!

[heyybii]

@snapnrool ur a faggot 2.. fucking faggot.. it lose faggot

[suntannedmedal]

@snapnrool no, both ftw

[heyybii]

@TheUberPlayboy u fucking faggot.. thats why it just got smoked.. u senceless fucking faggot ass

[TheUberPlayboy]

@heyybii nice beard... cunt

[heyybii]

@TheUberPlayboy at least ya got the cunt part right... becuase i got the hair off your mothers pussy while i was going down on her



[TheUberPlayboy]

@heyybii That all you got pussy? Mine was good because it was true... that nasty ass beard does fuck your face up; I can say what you said to me about anyone faggot.

[markoamg]

i dont belive this shit!!! jaguar is a fat fuck

[steve11fox]

I read somewhere Jag is gonna make an XFR-S with 560bhp. Imagine what a monster that'll be!

[71CommodoreGSE]

1. The Jag is more of a competitor for the E-Class.

2. The facelifted S63 has more power.

[hippievogelei]

@71CommodoreGSE e class is indeed the competitor for the jag, the S and Cl are limousines and long(limousine sport)coupe.

[resi42]

The mercedes is so wonderfull, but, that's apparently not enaugh against the Jaguar. I hate this shit (I'm talking about the jaguar).

[mondeost2202008]

Unfair for the S63 AMG to be honest. The Jag weighs lighter paired with a closely powerful engine and torque. An M5 would also smoke it.

Bring in the BMW 760li and Jaguar XJ :D

[GILERARUNNERRST1]

shit driver..s63 had 2 eat that fag

[Drnussbaum93]

Maybe the jaguar is faster then the Mercedes but the quality of the Mercedes is better :D

[izzzzzzzzzzy12]

S65 AMG V12 BITORBO 630bh  limited to1,000 Torques S63 AMG V8 naturally aspirated 544bh 800 Torques

[X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X8X]

I´m German, but I have to say: ENGLISH CARS ARE THE BEST IN THE WORLD !!!

[SMB67T]

WTH? Mercedes S-Class lose to a XFR? It's definitely not a truth video!

[StressFreeWorldWide]

I still love the amg

[TheGooodok]

That's bullshit)fake.E63 is even a bit faster than XFR.But E63 doesn't smoke S63 so badly.Damn,there is a football stadium between them..pathetic)

[00StangGT00]

@TheGooodok The S63 weighs like 800 pounds more than an XFR and has about the same HP, not really surprising at all the S63 got smoked it's a big tank.

[cast1021]

This is filmed in sweden. When finishing the race, the driver of the XFR asks the passenger: "- How could we win that easy? -It's a heavy car, it weighs over two tons."

The AMG has indeed a huge 6.3L engine, but it's not a very light car.

[ristika89]

@cast1021 it actually only has a 6.2 liter...its funny really, it should be considered false advertising!

[lancebangwell]

different class cars, whats up with these rolling starts? rolling starts are for fags!

[1Silas11]

Merc should be compared with the supersport XJ not xfr. Saying that, i think the xj supersport would probably still beat this benz as it's performance figures are pretty similar to the xfr's

[chris26900]

haha, i love how you can hear the V8 in the merc from inside the jag. such an amazing sounding engine

[LukeNAESA10]

@chris26900 The Jag sounds a million times better.

[chris26900]

@LukeNAESA10 Except for the fact you cant hear it.....

[Tommynatorium]

A S65 would be better :D and a Brabus V12 with 800HP would be best :D

[peanuts2105]

Mercedes is an old man's car. Too much of a"golf club" look about it.

[bpatryk69]

@peanuts2105 Thats because only old people can afford it =]

[Ma7ayaa]

very funny when you see Jag's fan boys are happy by seeing a car that weighs around 200 kg lose, they didn't try with E63 cause they know what will happen, Ok then try with the 2011 S63 Jag fan boys

[LukeNAESA10]

@Ma7ayaa There's more of you nazi fanboys on here I can tell you that. The AMG has shit loads of torque and is a V12.. Yet it get beaten by a 4 door saloon that is "just" 209KG lighter.

Also it tears this shitty Mercedes up in terms of fuel consumption and ride quality.

[chris26900]

@LukeNAESA10 uhhh, thats the s65. it would destroy the XFR. the S63 is a v8 dumbass. and the new s63 with the twin turbo would also destroy the XFR.

[LukeNAESA10]

@chris26900 The new XJR is getting a different engine than the XFR, also it's not in the same class so this race is dumb and pointless.

You're still gonna lose to the XJR no matter what ///AMG bullshit it is.

[chris26900]

@LukeNAESA10 @LukeNAESA10 haha, your ignorance amuses me, you've probably never even sat in and AMG or Jag but thats okay. you can go on with your life thinking what you want. enjoy your Honda or whatever it is you drive.

[LukeNAESA10]

@chris26900 The sound you hear in this video is the Jag because the guy is SAT in the Jag..

[chris26900]

@LukeNAESA10 watch any other video with this jag. it makes no sound. that sound is all 6.2 V8 Muscle from the S63. also the fact that as the s class get further away, the sound disappears.

[LukeNAESA10]

@chris26900 Lol, I know how the new Jags sound from inside I've been in one. Also, these cars are so well sound proofed from the inside you cannot hear FUCK ALL from outside so what you on about.

[LukeNAESA10]

@chris26900 Wow so I'm a dumbass because human error exists? I always thought Mercedes put big shitty washing machine engines in their lumbering lump S-Class cars..

Also the new XJR is getting a different engine than the XFR, so... na.

[Ma7ayaa]

@LukeNAESA10, first by mistake i typed 209 actually it's 291 which is almost 300kg, the weight deffirence is very huge and open your eyes, it's S63 so it got a V8 not V12! They raced with S63 cause they know it's the only merc it can beat hahaha

[LukeNAESA10]

@Ma7ayaa It's still keeping up with a car that's literally in the same class as the XJ. Jaguar's variant of the S65 AMG isn't even out yet.

Considering the S65 costs an assload more, and is being beaten by a lighter, sportier saloon car, which ISN'T in the same class, people who will be buying, will go for the latter and that's the Jag. Sorry. I also see this S63 - S65? Shitty naming system btw.. handling like a total boat.

[Ma7ayaa]

@LukeNAESA10, in the end racing cars in deffirent segment isn't fair, ok they've raced with 07-10 S63, let them try with the 2011 S63 with the new AMG engine, it has around 40hp more and it compensates some of the huge weight deffirence of 291kg, or race the new CL63 at least it's 140kg lighter but still heavier than XFR

[LukeNAESA10]

@Ma7ayaa The 2011 XJR is what competes against this car.

[loppar3]

@Ma7ayaa The XFR is around $ 100 000 in Sweden, it is faster, it looks better and turns more heads than the MB. So why would you buy an uglier and slower $ 200 000 car?

[m96gran]

@loppar3:

Because you can't ride anywhere longer than 1km in the xfr if you're used to the comfort in an S-class :)

XFR = E-class not S.

[Tha0men]

Hehe I feel some really bad Merc Fanboy's coming.

max torque in jag : 2500 rpm

max torque in merc: 5200 rpm

[nconteaza83]

it´s not trueeeeeeeeeee,it´s a joke!!!!

[joni19821]

Jaguar all the way. Luxury combined with performance.....BINGO

[Alien377]

mercedes have 2700kg jaguar have 2100kg

[goni330ci]

@Alien377 no no man 5800 kg hahahaha is bullshit..jaguar 1820 kg and merc ca 2070 kg..;)

[bballman345]

I dont know why you guys are shitting so hard on the AMG driver. I don't know if anyone has ever driven an automatic, but you put it in drive, and especially from a roll, just push the gas pedal down as hard as you can. Not much skill involved. Shumacher couldnt roll race it any better than a 16 year old girl.

[sanju2]

@bballman345 You're giving 16 year old girls way too much credit.

[GILERARUNNERRST1]

dude ,even if im not a racer i would drive much better then the s63 amg driver..GET OUT THE FUCKING CAR AND SHAME YOURE SELF FUCKING IDIOT AMG DRIVER!

[Ma7ayaa]

S63 is a whale! around 300kg heavier, try with E63

[stomstomnogo]

@Ma7ayaa no, only 80 kg heavier.

[Ma7ayaa]

@stomstomnogo, No it's 209kg heavier, S63 weighs 2100kg and the XFR weighs 1809 kg, 200kg makes huge difference

[immowycedzacz]

@Ma7ayaa 2100 - 1809 = 291, not 209

[Ma7ayaa]

@immowycedzacz Oh sorry by mistake =) thanks bro

[jamburaz01]

AMG lost :( .. i think they made a plan for thid videO .. AMG is AMG ;)

[mzb007]

the cl 65 or the s 65 is way cooler then the s 63

[phils550]

The guy in the Mercedes didn't know what the fuck he was doing!!! Drive the car or get the fuck out of the driver's seat!! SMH

[weetnietgeen]

@Cycleian german cars are built way more properly then most brittish or american car... ;)

[AddersZXR4]

go jag!

[muradpersali]

bullshit driver.give me this mers.

[draflopan87]

same power but much heavier the merc,simple,

the E63 (from the same class) beats easily the XFR

[373axle]

the S63 owner should of forgotten brand new, and bought a used S65/CL65 amg. He would of won this race too, while driving something a lot more exclusive.

[Trithij]

I didn't expect S63 to be so slow, If it were S65 AMG - would be a completely different story.

[peter9style]

@Trithij unfortunately not.

[Trithij]

@peter9style It is a fact - S65 AMG is the quickest 4 door saloon on the planet, Jaguar would be thrashed by 1000 Nm of torque very very easily. It will not even be a competition.

[peter9style]

@Trithij thats what I almost said :D even the S63 would smoke it,

because the engine is actually the same!

[flymewithballoOns]

my honda civik vtak edition GTR special model door handles is way faster than both of your cars combined.

[uberenthusiasts]

@flymewithballoOns Keep the dream alive.

[flymewithballoOns]

@uberenthusiasts I say keep the sense of humor alive :) It was a joke....get it? A JOKE.

[makavelim3]

Both cars have the same power, but the jaguar is way lighter

[barendbrouwer1]

Utter rubbish the s-class is way way way faster than this

[horatium16]

the guy in the Jaguar said at the start Mercedes "six point three" .It's wrong the merc got a 6.2 engine not 6.3

[W33Dblazer]

fuck i want a s class!

[bellini1992]

i would take the S 63 anyday....

[gregfiesta1]

these cars are almost the same in numbers..so in this case is all about the driver..the m5 have beat the xfr but not the s63 (saw that live)

[TheTripleX]

It's not GTBoard's fault the S63 was slower. It's a slower car, it's the fact. The S65 would have crushed the XFR.

[hondacar]

Mercedes cars racing,is like having the biggest penis(engine)but suffering from performance anxiety(impotence).

They boast big engines,turbo or supercharged ,big torque,huge hp and yet fail at the track.

[YUSKHAN]

63 AMG engines are discontinued

[TheVtieg6]

@AdrienS81

No the XFR is an M5 and E63 AMG rival

[mstt1010]

Didn't expect the s63 to lose this bad, oh well, the 6.2litre known as the 6.3 will be replaced with a 5.5 turbo

[LazBro123]

that mb just got owned!!!!!!!!!!!LOL

[BigrickNL]

get a s65 more qual to the jag........ bye bye jag

[potjhm1]

I hope Jag produce an XJR. Imagine how awesome that would be!

[steve11fox]

Those claiming the 'merc is made for comfort & not racing', well, so is this Jag, It can be every bit as comfy as a MB yet still manages to be a darn good drag racer at the same time. It's one of the 3 or 4 fastest/best handling sedans around today. I've read enough journalists describe this Jag as truely the best of both worlds. We have to give a hearty slap on the back to the Jag engineers for achieving that.

[dartasweideris]

mb is NA car :)

[garreth224]

Getting kind of sick of watching half of these tools who can't even properly drive an AUTOMATIC car in a straight line. So much money...so little ability. Brutal.

[fatalegg]

Bro DOES AN AMG EVER DO WELL IN ONE OF YOUR BULLSHIT VIDEOS? JESUS

[zhbroder]

hahaha word. but i don't think it's bs

[psmTARDCORE]

@fatalegg lol merc fanboy so angry. SO ANGRY

[jcsrt8]

@fatalegg I agree with you!!! I love the board, but AMG's always lose.

[Verification11]

@fatalegg both has more than 500hp but the xfr w8s less so its no big deal i would like to see a barbus in m5board tho

[Tha0men]

@Verification11

the less weight doesnt provide much more results in a sprint like this. the merc has more hp. BUT the jaguar has a better engine, max usefull torque at 2500 rpm and the mercedes gets its at 5200 rpm. noticeble at the start of the race.

[Verification11]

@Tha0men make sense cause torque is very important in drag racing especially at the start ... useful info .. thank u

and also thank u for not calling me stupid like any typical utube faggout

[GallardoFreak888]

@fatalegg the S63 weighs 2 tons and more while the Jag is a little below the 2 ton mark or on it

it is unfair cuz its a smaller car vs a larger one

[brownfoxx69]

@fatalegg your so fucking right. I wish I could thumbs up this a hundred times.

[kneckebenkross]

@fatalegg no they are to weak against all cars o.0