Added: 5 years ago
From: GreedoDrewFirst
Views: 42,619
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (285)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I've watched a few of Bill O'Reilly's videos and at first I actually thought he was a comedian playing a character.

  • @squeezycheeseypeas stephen colberts, colbert report, plays his character as bill o reilly.

  • @narutokiller9 brilliant, I'll have a look at some

  • Many Lib.s like this jerk find so much joy at the pain and errors of others. Since 06 nsmbc is almost off the air taking this jerk with it.

  • I cannot beleive that he tried to lecture a 4 star General about war. Or that he was so horrible to that kid who lost his father in 9/11. He is just disgusting in every way.

  • I cannot beleive that he tried to lecture a 4 star General about war. Or that he was so horrible to that kid who lost his father in 9/11. He is just disgusting in every way.

  • @blargsix its too bad a lot of people dont see things like you and I do, his viewers must just think "hey, he is loud and sure of himself, he must be right! the people who dissagree with him must be stupid and wrong!" I can only hope that people see him for what he is, he doesnt care about ANYONE but himself, he will just say he cares about his fans because they are the only reason he is still on the air

  • Am I the only one that is reminded of the scientist guy from the ghostbusters?

  • @ragerancher Now that you mention it...

  • Bill O'Dear

  • I wish the Germans would shoot O'Reilly.

  • Mainstream media is gasping its last breath. Will the last viewer out please turn off the lights. The NWO was not ready for the information age. I am looking forward to the coming treason trials.

  • Embarrassed for Americans ha ha Fuckin bill O'Reilly Loonies

  • This moron is mentally disturbed.

  • Hiel O'Nazi

    I would not worry too much about him, when the s@#t hits the fan he will not last long. Same goes for the rest of those traiters.

  • THEY WILL HANG!

  • Wasn't the all knowing Bill a teacher at one point in his life? I hope it wasn't a history teacher.

    Bill will never admit when he is wrong. He is going to go screaming and kicking about how right he is about everything all the way to his nice, comfy detention camp. I wonder what kind of spin he will put on that!?

  • GruSS an alle Voksgenossen !

    Heil Hitler !

  • this was great seeing oriely ripped apart!r.i.p to all the souls who where lost in ww2,they were a different breed of soldiers to those of the present

  • BILL O´FAILURE

  • @Koopatroopa01 #1 a decade and running....yeah, i believe failure is one thing Bill is not.

  • Moron. You're saying Bill O'Reilly is correct in saying what he said? He invents false figures from sources that don't exist, is famous for his inability to allow people to present arguments that he cannot possibly answer (this is prevented by carrying on like a child, yelling, screaming, name-calling, etc), and is venomously traditional in his conservatism.

  • And you, like Bill O'Reilly, seem to pull your facts out of thin air: In February Obama set into action an 18-month withdrawal of Iraq for the combat forces stationed there, with troops only remaining to train the Iraqi's security forces (possibly up until 2011) which is the extent of our obligation after the former administration's blunder that sent us there in the first place. Before making an argument, present attributable facts.

  • Like most undereducated Republicans, you dodge the issue at hand. Bush was NOT doing the exact same thing. Bush's withdrawal was pushed back indefinitely when he left office. And I never said Olbermann wasn't attacking anyone personally, he was certainly attacking Bill-O. It must be easy for you, just accepting propaganda without question or verifying facts yourself. If you decide to reply, do some research and make an informed comment. Perhaps you'll surprise yourself.

  • Bush repeatedly vetoed bills to set a timetable for withdrawing our troops. John McCain thought it would be okay if U.S. troops stayed in Iraq for another hundred years. The Republicans advocated PERMANENT WAR, NEVER ENDING death and mutilation of our troops.

  • hes withdrawing troops from iraq...bush started 2 wars. Afghanistan is the only place we should have been.

  • Thank you to the news channels like MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC for the honest news! Fox is pure lier news channel, sad!

  • bill o reilly can go suck his boyfriends p*#*y!!

  • MSNBC

    satanic worship at it best

  • Bill O'Reilly is very secure in his job with FOX News Inc.  The anti-semetic, racist Rupert Murdock loves the fuckwad and won't get rid of him. He needs O'Reilly to continue his,(Murdock's), 'Dumbing Down Of America', and it all fits into the Right-wing, Neo-conservative game plan. Murdock and most of the Far Right Repubs know that they need to have an uninformed or misinformed public to come back into power.

  • You go Keith, Bill O'Reilly is a traitor and an idiot and should not be on the air anymore. someone needs to do something about this, And why is Fox News covering up his mistakes?

  • Unfortunately Monsieur...that's not going to happen. 

    Thank you Keith Olbermann!

  • If Bill said this kind of stuff on the BBC here in the UK he'd be sacked, an enquiry would start, he'd receive death threats, and that is just the start. Surely this retard must have lawsuits against him for slander left right and centre. If there are I hope he gets sued into bankruptcy.

  • I'm in Canada...Is this guy still on the air? About four years ago "The 5th Estate" a news show up here did a show on Fox News that left me speechless.

  • Billo is a Nazi cunt. Pure and simple.

  • As you ?

  • Wow, Fox is so horrid they have to change their transcripts to try to hide their ignorance.

  • To quote Snoop Dogg, "Fuck Bill O'Reilly... Suck my dick."

  • Chenogne Massacre. Look it up. O'Reilly should have done a lot better prep if he was going to talk about this.

  • gamingeagle19, in 2002, O'Reilly LIED that the "Iraq War Will be a Cake Walk". Tell that to thousands of devastated families. Bill told Edwards that "there are NO homeless veterans" & challenged a guest to "bring him one". 100s showed up at Fox 2 days later & Bill dismissed them as "drunks". As VA officials noted, had Bill not dodged the draft he might be more understanding of what war can do to people. Two words you might look up before lowering yourself more to Bill's side: "Andrea Mackris".

  • "in 2002, O'Reilly LIED that the "Iraq War Will be a Cake Walk""

    Is he a psychic. No. He didn't know how long it would be. That was an idiotic analysis.

    With Edwards he didn't say there were zero he said Edwards was exaggerating. He knew there were homeless veterans. You would have to be a dolt to not know that. When he found that there really were that many he had a chairman of a big foundation that specializes in helping these vets.>>>

  • They talked about how they were helping vets or trying to help them.That story about people showing up at Fox is bogus. That's a load of bull.

    Bill was never drafted to go to war. He wouldn't have been able to dodge it if he was. He would have been arrested.

    And I know about the gold digger Andrea Mackris.

  • You do realize that MSNBC will be the Fox News of the next 8 years, right?

  • lol

  • olbermen (excuse spelling) is not exactly mr. honest either. i don't like any news stations. they are all propaganda.

  • People say this, but there are no similar callings out. Do you have documentation of Mr. Olbermann claiming a false thing to be true? A thing that is not opinion, I mean. I find that he has made mistakes, but always offers corrections (which isn't sufficient, of course -- see Four Arguments For The Elimination Of Television). Can you back up your claim, sir?

  • His entire piece is opinion, smart one.

  • If that were true, then there would be even less sense in calling the guy a liar. One might be able to construct a scenario that seemed to indicate dishonesty in the expression of his opinions, but that's much, much harder to show.

    So, if you call this guy a liar or dishonest, what evidence do you have to support the accusation? I'm genuinely curious.  I see lots of vitriol against Mr. Olbermann, but no substantive support for the accusations.

  • I didn't call him a liar, i basically called him a douchebag, so stop you're whining. I don't need evidence, it's my opinion that it's horrible. So stop with the stupid evidence crap, it just makes you looks incredibly (stupider) than you are

  • If you look, you will find that my original message was in response to someone who said that Mr. Olbermann "is not exactly mr. honest either". That is the accusation to which I referred in my subsequent post.

    As for your claim that you "basically called him a douchebag", I'm seeing no such comment in this thread whatsoever. Perhaps you imagined it.

    Also, I would like to suggest that you proofread your comments before you cast aspersions on others' comments.

  • don't reply to my comment then idiot

  • PS, get a life

  • prescott bush brought hitler to power check the facts yourself.

  • No 82nd Airborne, and it is not even sure if there was a 'massacre'.

    The evidence that he wasn't just bullshiting, either out of ignorance or stupidity is slim at best.

  • The man is a reporter and doesn't check facts.Now you know why 67 million voted for Bush. He and Bush say they are patriots bull they are the traitors of our great nation.

    911 was an inside job.

  • Bill OReilly why are you so fucking stupid?

    Bill- " I like turtles"

  • Why do the American people bother with sexual perverts like O'reilly and General Clark (who is an insult to the armed forces)

  • Well, when garbage and anal waste stops coming out of O'reilly's mouth, then he'll stop talkinb about him.

  • Bill O'Reilly should be murdered!

  • I know he should. I've always wondered what guy would end up assassinating him first. I bet they will have a raffle on who gets to do it soon enough.

  • First, he needs to get fired, then... eliminated and erased from the earth.

  • the "left" views are becoming more and more central. "right" views are slowly becoming fringe.

  • Moveon . org seems a bit fringe to me.

  • Well, the true fact is that America is too far right anyway. America are far more right wing than Europe for example. Obama would be classed as a right wing conservative in Europe. You guys are due for an ideological shift left towards the center anyway to redress the balance.

  • We're also more right wing than North Korea.

  • Of course we are more right the Europe. Thats why we have been so much more successful.

  • Uh huh and the fact that you lot were never bombed during ww2 had nothing to do with it due to being on the other side of 2 oceans. Aside form a few bombs on balloons that terrified you.

    But hey you're successful. Thats why your average standard of living is dropping and you're no longer even in the top 10 in the worlds standard of living. Thats why Europeans work less hours than you yet are on average more productive and get paid more.

    You personally are also less successful in grammar. :)

  • Just to be clear for the historically ignorant - the US was bombed in WW2.

    Its called 'Pearl Harbor'. Look it up.

    As for O'Riely, his show is more comedy than news reporting, a parody of sorts. You can get more reliable news from Comedy Central, in the forms of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. And that is very sad, but very true.

  • If you look at the known history of the world, the world has only gotten and continues to get more liberal, free and full of truth, which is what conservatives really can't stand hearing: the truth.

  • O'Reilly could fall into the trap of answering every nut job that attacks him, or he could continue to do the show that gains him 4X the audience of his nearest competitor.

    All of his rivals wish that had that problem.

  • You are not Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann is not a nut job.

  • Well you are half right.

  • Yes Yes Olbemann disagrees with you and that makes him a nut job.

  • Jimmy it's time to put down the crack pipe.

  • Keith Olbermann is not a nut job, come on, you have an Olbermann fixation, and you think I'M on crack?

    LOL

    Olbermann? Come on admit it you are on his staf? Are you one of the wankers that Olbermann pays people to promote him online?

  • You claimed Olbermann is a nut job and you know it.

    Now get back to your fluffer job foley.

  • LMAO you ARE one of the wankers that Olbermann pays to promote him online.

  • I try to enlighten people like you for free.

  • grazon, I apologize. I wanted to thumb you up, and, accidentally thumed you down. I totaly agree with you. If you or anyone reading this comment knows how to repair an accidental stars rating and thumbs I'll be gratefull if you can inform me how it's done. Again I apologize grazon.

  • No problem.

    I've made that mistake at least a dozen times.

  • Battle of the Bulge (1966), and Saints and Soldiers (2004), dramatized the Malmedy massacre of Americans by Germans in 1944.

    How could he get this backwards -- twice, even after public correction?

    Should we believe that in 9/11/2001, Americans attacked Al Qaeda by hijacking their airliners? Or that we surprise attacked Japan in in 12/7/1941?

    So Bill, were 6 million Nazis gassed by Jews in WWII? Did Dewey defeat Truman? Did dead soldiers quit in honor of golf playing Bush?

  • Keith Olbermann is so jealous that every hint of an O'Reilly oversight has to be blown up into a case of treason.

    They do the same thing to Bush.

    If you are the president, don't make a mistake, or the liberals will want to try you and execute you for war crimes and treason.

    The fact is Olbermann would not fair any better to the scrutiny that O'Reilly faces everyday. This is a manifestation of the bitterness that Olbermann feels about O'Reilly having 4X the audience he has.

  • Nice job refuting what Olbermann said.

  • Why would i try?

    Once refuted, Olbermann would only have another example.

    BTW, EACH of the examples could be refuted.

    His motivation is in trying to take watchers, not being correct.

  • It's good to hear both sides of an argument but infotainment like the O'Reilly Factor only severely impairs Americans when it comes time to vote on important issues. Clips of O'Reilly's debates on youtube show a man who twists facts to suit his point and when an opponent provides an educated response to one of his questions, Bill will ether ignore, interrupt, declare his opponents claim as irrelevant or say, and i paraphrase "I don't believe you". In short, Bill O'Reilly is a terrible person.

  • O'Reilly could fall into the trap of answering every nut job that attacks him, or he could continue to do the show that gains him 4X the audience of his nearest competitor.

    All of his rivals wish that had that problem.

  • that Side Show Bob reference is SPOT ON!!!

  • accept olbermann made up what he said lol

  • the anti liberal movement initiated by Joseph McCarthy in the 1950's was ignited by McCarthy, as a Freshman Senator from Wisconsin, accusing the US Army of "torturing" the Nazi war criminals, that had been proven guilty of the Malmedy nassacre at the "Dacheau" war crimes tribunal after WWll.

    The perpetrators of the massacres of unarmed GI POW's was Joichem Peiper..and the officer over him was HItlers favorite tank commander Sepp Deitrich..after Hitler had given the orders of "No Prisoners".

  • are u serious? do ur research, bill is a joke seriously

  • i have a tire iron with billo's name on it..lol..no but seriously he is a mike cutting loud talking ignorant a-hole.

  • a racist pervert who also happens to be a liar,not Bill O'reilly

  • The sad thing is Bill might only be doing what gets people watching. who knows. ... he is still a fucking liar and a traitor tho!

  • Fucking DIE!!

  • Is this for real. What time is this on in pacific time.

  • Bill o'really is a money grubbing whore. He has a big personality and a strong voice, but no message.

    Hes like a megaphone that only screams profanity.

    Attention grabbing, yes. But eventually the novelty wears off and you realize you're just getting shit yelled at you.

  • BillO has fallen for the charade, so often practiced at Fox, that by just saying something a whole lot, people will believe it. Psychiatrists should study this strange form of self-delusion.

  • Except they're not.

  • Why? For the same reason the masses screamed for Jesus to be crucified while cheering for Barabus's release. Because most people are sheep and rarely do what's good for them. Now who's gulping down the NeoCon'aid? And don't avoid the subject; u pukes always bring up ratings cuz u can't refute what Keith's reporting.

  • Becase there are a LOT of thick Americans.

  • Bill is a piece of crap. Don't watch FOX news. FOX news isn't news it is EXTREME RIGHT PROPAGANDA.

  • What does Olbermann care about US soldiers being killed. He has always been on the side of the enemy.

  • That's the lamest thing I've ever heard, douche.

  • Olberman isn't making any of this up. He's just sharing the facts. The extreme right-wing people that have commented have no proof that Bill O'Reilly is right, so instead they badger, insult, and perpetuate the lie. No one can deny it. Bill O'Reilly lied about Malmedy - twice!

  • lol @ Media Matters. What a joke.

  • you make me pray for nuclear holocaust.

  • O'Reilly is a disgrace. Why are his treasonous remarks broadcast on a prime time slot, and then covered up by the Fox News Network?

    And he insults the intelligence of all his viewers by denying his outrageous error. I have no idea what sort of point he was trying to make by accusing Americans of mass murder, anyway.

    Get this facile bloviator off the air, and replace him with someone who can get their facts straight.

  • you see why you get so many thumbs up? ever question why so many young guys are liberal? check your education, get this, in his show, O'reilly said that because he wanted to show that in war, it's hard to control ones' emotion especially when your comrades are being killed. You don't even know Olbershit, tell me what facts he can say beside trying to get some ass from Oreilly? America is done with this new generation, luckily i am not a part of it...

  • Controlling your emotions is one thing. Rounding up a group of unarmed prisoners and mowing them down with machine gun fire until they are dead, dead, dead is another thing entirely.

    Perhaps maybe it's  assuming to take the word of an experienced general over that of a sanctimonious font of verbal sewage when it comes to military history. But I'm putting my money on Wesley Clarke.

    The boss is giving me hell, so please excuse me while I now gun down all my co-workers.

  • i don't want to laugh, but ironically, you don't know wars, you don't know how you will become animals in just a flash of seconds, especially when you don't know who are friends and who are enemies. Just remember this, the "civilian" muslims there could be the one who chopped off other civilians and US soldiers'heads AFTER they were arrested. You guys shut your fucking "Empathy" up, American Hypocrisy from the liberals made me puke...

  • "American Hypocrisy..."

    I'm British, for what it's worth. Maybe you think that's worse? We invented hypocrisy, pal... ;)

    And you're right, I've never been near a war zone, so I cannot possibly 'empathise' with someone who has been in the heat of battle.

    I've done some reading on Malmady. Fact: O'Reilly got it wrong (twice *cough*) - the Nazi's commited the mass executions in question ctd...

  • That's a DISASTER FOR A COUNTRY. TRY TO THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES BASED ON REALITY IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHY...

  • Another fact: The US Army was given a 'kill on sight' order for any encounter they had with SS troops AFTER they learned of the atrocity committed on US troops after Malmedy.

    Perhaps you nurse this fantasy that 'liberals' as you call them are knee jerk reactionaries with diametrically opposed views to your own. Maybe some are like that ctd...

  • And Oreilly made not a lot of mistakes if you do really reseach. I AM A SKEPTIC, IT MEAN THAT I JUDGE THINGS BASED ON MY EXPERIENCES. I AM ALSO FROM A COMMUNIST COUNTRY. My view is society needs balancing between conservatives and liberals to function properly. In America today, The liberals are increasingly outnumbering conservatives

  • OK. One of my closest friends is a war orphan from former Yugoslavia, and I have a great deal of time for his outlook on things. Please don't think my intent was to offend, it's just I think too many people sit in their own political camp without daring to entertain an opposing viewpoint. Evidently you're not such a person, so I hope I wasn't out of line with my previous comments.

    And I agree, equilibrium must exist if a society is to function harmoniously.

  • One of my closest friends is from former Yugoslavia, OK? I've got a lot of time for his views. My apologies if I seemed out of line.

    You may be surprised to know that you and I see eye to eye on this stuff, to an extent. Like you, I firmly believe there should be an equilibrium in society, but unfortunately the polarisation of politics in America has made it very difficult for the voice of reason to be heard.

  • Perhaps O'Reilly has given inspiration to many Americans, but he is, let's face it, a tabloid demagogue, and the "Us and Them" mentality that people like him on both sides of the spectrum foster virtually guarantees a see-saw effect based on "who do we hate the most?"

    There is no "fair and balanced" where O'Reilly is concerned, it's "shout the other guy down so he can't get his point across."

    Thats the problem I have with O'Reilly.

  • Good point, Oreilly is fairly on the conservative side as well as Fox news. But Fox is beleaguered by all other liberal channels if anyone really know propaganda. Without liberals, America will be like Iran or Cuba. However, with so many liberals and few conservatives, America will stumble worse than France compared to China and Russia

  • By the way I don't identify with liberals or conservatives. I think anyone who labels themself as either is an idiot. I do other things. Like engage in the democratic process. Think. Learn. Be ready to have someone challenge my views. And check the facts before spouting total garbage on TV.

  • Ok, that's good to debate with reasons. Who is perfect in this imperfect world? Oreilly was wrong in that specific case, so what. His other arguments in his entire programs have inspired lots of people. You don't accept it, but anybody nowadays either has a conservative or a liberal views on anything. I am not talking about Economics, it's about Social

  • This is the problem I have with O'Reilly mate. Well one problem, anyway.

    It's not just that he gets his facts wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. It's that when he's caught in the act, he compounds it by denying the mistake (or lie) was ever made, thereby grossly insulting the intelligence of those who watch his show. And he's not alone in driving the standards of political discourse in America down to the level of partisan, ego-driven grandstanding, both sides are to blame there.

  • i agree with you on the not idenifying with either side becuz im liberal on somethings and conservative on others. every one thinks im for abortion gay marriage open borders and everything else they associate with liberals becuz im a democrat. the only reason im a dem. is becuz they support union. im not going to say everything im for and against. i just want to say daicahuy has no life at all quit scanning bills videos for people to argue with. your a loser

  • bill oreilly new the context in which he was speaking of malmedy the second time around he is just a stuborn jack ass. Is a load of bull that oreilly can blame others of being traitors for disagreeing with what america does to its prisoners but he is in fact the traitot slandering dead americans who can not defend themselves. he is a peice of trash and needs to be taken off the air.

  • all other guys should be taken out before him, you are not here to be on the troop side, you just want to lambast O, be true...

  • Yes I am, I would do the same to anyone that would smear the names of dead soldiers repeatedly, even after he knew he was wrong. You dont know me so you dont know my views on O. I honestly dont agree with alot of what he says but there are also things that I agree with him on strongly. The fact is I really have never had a problem with him until I saw this. I find his views interesting even if I dont agree. I respect everyones opinion, but what I dont respect is someone slandering dead soldiers

  • the thing is most of his views are extremely beneficial to the USA in a time that liberals are increasingly taking over every aspect of the country. Don't think conservatives are not aware of his mistakes. However, his mistakes are not significant compared to what he represents the conservatives in this land

  • name a few of his views that are extremley beneficial to the country. im not making fun of you, im just curious as to wich ones you agree with

  • How about his view on protecting victims instead of protecting criminals? how about his strong views on terrorism which liberals are supporting the terrorists? How about his view on teachers' morality and behaviors? How about his view on immigration in which i myself am a foreigner? How about his view on restriction of extreme liberal behaviors? How about his protection of religions? Fun what?

  • actually ive watched talk bad about the victims of the kidnapping of shawn hornbeck were he accused him of liking where he was at, he was actually saying that that kid prefured be a sexual slave of a 45 year old nut case becuz he never tried to escape. thats not protecting the victim, thats slandering him

  • There are some things that are not what they appear to be. Haven't you read cases where the kidnapped actually developed feelings and relationships with the kidnappers? Nobody can read the kids' mind why he did not escape when he had chances. Oreilly wanted severe punishment on the kidnapper, he just questioned the kid's mentality. Is that a bad thing?..to you

  • I know that its called stalkhome syndrome and oreilly said it himself that he doesnt beleive that stalkhome sydrome is real wich leaves the only other option that he beleives this kid liked being with the guy only becuz he didnt have to go to school. He firmly beleives that the kid liked being a sex slave over going to school and being wit his family.

  • he did not say that the kid liked being a sex slave over going to school and being wit his family. What a shame you said such lie with a straight "writing"...There are reasons beyond your assumption and factors that made a kidnapped tied up to a kidnapper

  • oh so he kidnapped them becuz he enjoyed the company of a 11 year old? wow your more ignorant than i thought. im done arguing with you your an ignorant man.

  • ignorant you, i said the kids might have reasons not to leave the kidnapper after many years staying with them. Bend my words do you no good. If intelligent people look on this conversation, they know who the retard is. Most important point: punish hard the kidnapper, shame on you to think otherwise.

  • i have never seen a liberal support terrorism you are just regurgitatong what bill says on his program. This war had nothing to do with terrorism when we first went into it. it was for wmd's and then when we find out that their were none he started saying we never went their for wmd's we are there to take down a dictator and to stop terrorism.

  • you have never seen a liberal support terrorism? Let's check who are the lawyers who not only represent but try to acquit the terrorists in mainland and in Guantanamo? Who are the judges that try to delay and strip the federal authority of prosecuting terrorists? What do the ACLU want when they try to cancel all kinds of domestic "spying" in America? You can't understand, too bad

  • you cant preach democracy and not practice it.you have to give the prisoners at guantanamo trials.if even one person being held is innocent then it justifies giving all of them fair trials.And liberals are not delaying anything bush and most republicans have no wish to give them a fair trial get your facts straight you are ignorant you hate liberals so you try to manipulate information so it makes your view look good.

  • democracy like going to trials where thousands of criminals are set free either through bails or through "lack of evidence"? Ex: the 6 terrorists in Portland, who were making bombs to kill thousands, went to court, laughed at the judges and were put 5 to 8 months in Prison..ha..ha..manipulate your ass. If i were in fascism, i would be killed first.

  • They don't round up the guys in Guantanamo on the streets as innocents or through random checkings, ok, retard. All of the guys there were arrested either through war battles or with hot evidences at their houses or cameras or witnesses? Check the verdicts given to Moussaoi, the terrorists in Spain...many of them were released with contempt..

  • retard? wow you sound like a middle schooler. First of all evidence doesnt not decide innocense or not. If someone said you killed a bus full of people and they had evidence on you it doesnt mean you did it it. their have been many people that were thrown in prison because their was evidence against them, and then later released from prison becaus more evidence turned up later on that proved they were innocent and if you cant realize that than you are the retard my friend

  • my professors sound like kids too..you dumbass, what make sense is more important. I can listen to a 10 years-old all day long if he makes sense. Heard of the 10-years old in Yale? If evidences can not show a person's guild, what can? You fucking country doesn't allow interrogations. Lastly, how many people were wrongly in jAILS compared to the right criminals? and how many are outside because lack of proof? Iam no friend of criminal's lovers

  • maybe a better name would be "mrextremecantusetheeglishlang­uage

  • i understand much more than you do you sound like a fascist. you have no idea if the lawyers are liberal or conservative you just assume they are becuz you think your side is perfect you sound like every other ignorant republican ive met. get a life and quit scoping out people on bills videos just so you can argue

  • you are ignorant to think you know something. Fascist my ass for an Asian. I just want the truth. I checked the lawyers' backgrounds and most of them have associations with liberal groups.ok.However, the point is no fucking real conservatives represent the terrorists,ok. My life is so comfortable and full of love. Bad thing is i want to argue with retarded like you

  • lastly, don't pretend to be objective, dude. A person is shown by his words. Ashamed of being liberals? that is impossible because liberals think they are world saviors...ha..ha

  • So in other words criticising a gasbag is a violation of freedom of the press?

  • I LOVE MSNBC Bill O'Reilly is a jackass.

  • mind of a mistress! or you should call yourself "memoir of a geisha" because your brain will always belong to someone else...illiterate!!!

  • Umm how long ago did I post a comment on this video???? . . . . do yourself a favor and find a hobbie real quick. No that does not include riding O'Reilly's cock like a rodeo. OLBERMANN ROCKS!!!! goodbye douchebag

  • i am owning a mistress, don't have interest in gay sex...you do what your sadistic mind tell you to with Olbershit...ha..ha..just hate your personal attack on O without reason..

  • You don't own anyone, your a slave to Mistress O'Reilly.You me to sit there & assume that I only hate O' Reilly because of this report.I hate O' Reilly because he is racist,ignorant, pretentious asshole who always thinks he is correct.He & the people of Faux News could die for all I care. Face it O'Reilly has bullshit stories.Like he said the other day in his interview w/Alf "I annoy people for a living" & you know what?that is the only honest thing he said on his show since it started.

  • people who watch him don't listen to everything he says. But he does say more good things than bad things. He does say things that many people in this country does not have chances to say. He is the big voice for a shrinking conservatives base. You only see what you want to see from him, not necessarily what he really is...you are just a typical kid growing in this liberal society

  • O'Reilly and FOX is the best! Easy to talk when YOU don't fight. Enemy ARE Enemy, not American's. I dont care about THEM. This is PROPANGANDA!

  • So you approve of blaming the American military for the Malmedy massacre?

  • I support the US troops all the way. I dont care if they KILL the ALL. This ass your listen to dont know shit. Fu-king Dems are always blaming out Troop so fu-k OFF. This sounds like the anti-Nam group! To chicken shit to fight but a know it ALL.

  • Okay your rambling semi-coherence reminds me of a poster I saw in London once that said "Yoko Ono is a genius." I recognized the words but they certainly didn't belong in that order ever. Are you currently playing the Scrabble drinking game or are you simply aphasic?

  • Your from Ma. and need to go back to your dancing show, what do you know? 25, what a show!

  • Getting closer to coherent, but not by much.

  • Directions-Pull slowly rearwards and remove head out of BUTT!

  • Wow, what you're saying actually made sense this time. See? It isn't necessary to drink a whole bottle of scotch before posting.

  • 25 yr old know it all that dont know Shit. Chicken Shit!

  • And you're back to posting while drunk I see.