What a truly exquisite interpretation of the Barcarolle! I have long eschewed Rubinstein in Chopin...but this early take on the Op. 60 is more than worth listening to. BRAVO, Rubinstein. (:-0)
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
I realise this piece was very close to Rubinsteins heart. For me however no one has ever come close to Lipattis combination of sheer romantic ardour and disciplined pianism.
I've always felt that Rubinstein's 1957 recording of this marvelous piece was his finest hour; the tempo is simply too fast here to suggest a lazy ride on the water.
Fascinating glimpse of the standards that held sway in the 1920's. The tone is splendid! But, it would be difficult for me to get used to the wildly erratic tempo changes and exaggerated rubati throughout. He plays with control -- as though he is doing what he WANTS to do -- but for me it lurches forward suddenly every now and then and feels as though it's spinning out of control, then he jerks on the reins and everything slows down almost to a crawl.
Rubinstein had a special way with this marvelous piece; he recorded it many times, but for me the greatest of them all is the one from 1957, originally issued on RCA LM-2277 (Rubinstein Plays Chopin.) There he soars to the heights.
Well, the problem is that they played the test recording back to Rubinstein immediately after he had recorded it in order to demonstrate to him how the new electrical recording system was far superior to the old acoustic method. In so doing, the original wax recording could not be used as a master matrix for metal stampers.. Whether HMV preserved this wax, I have no idea. . . . .
I love Rubinstein's playing, but I've never really liked this piece and Chopin in general. When I listen to this I listen more to the pianist rather than the composer.
What a truly exquisite interpretation of the Barcarolle! I have long eschewed Rubinstein in Chopin...but this early take on the Op. 60 is more than worth listening to. BRAVO, Rubinstein. (:-0)
Noshirm 1 month ago
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
veritas6960 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
veritas6960 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
veritas6960 8 months ago
I discovered this recording years ago, as a 10-year-old spending evenings alone in the house, and fell under its spell. No other recording of this will ever sound right to me. I only wish I could play it one-tenth as well as Rubinstein!
veritas6960 8 months ago
I realise this piece was very close to Rubinsteins heart. For me however no one has ever come close to Lipattis combination of sheer romantic ardour and disciplined pianism.
meredith21846 9 months ago
nice¡¡¡¡¡
yosuezp 1 year ago
One must remember the conditions and time limitation these early recordings were under.
Bruce88keys 1 year ago
I've always felt that Rubinstein's 1957 recording of this marvelous piece was his finest hour; the tempo is simply too fast here to suggest a lazy ride on the water.
billyguns2 2 years ago
Beautifully played. Bravo! TY.
paulostroff99 2 years ago
makes me want to play the piano. craigslist has a bunch for free all the time.
billkazb 2 years ago 2
Fascinating glimpse of the standards that held sway in the 1920's. The tone is splendid! But, it would be difficult for me to get used to the wildly erratic tempo changes and exaggerated rubati throughout. He plays with control -- as though he is doing what he WANTS to do -- but for me it lurches forward suddenly every now and then and feels as though it's spinning out of control, then he jerks on the reins and everything slows down almost to a crawl.
His later work was much more tasteful
Pischnaholic 2 years ago 2
Who was it who said, Every day my taste improves, but I am losing my genius.
Beckmesser2 2 years ago 4
@Pischnaholic Maybe if you were Polish you would like it better.
fmorgana 3 days ago
This is so magical . His interpretation and sensitive musical feeling are out of this world.
cattleman6420012000 2 years ago
3:31 min... maravilla
espp87 2 years ago
nice picture
puchalaka 2 years ago
.........................
INTERNETVID 2 years ago
Excellent the quality of the audio for a 1928 recording.
codonauta 2 years ago 2
Rubinstein had a special way with this marvelous piece; he recorded it many times, but for me the greatest of them all is the one from 1957, originally issued on RCA LM-2277 (Rubinstein Plays Chopin.) There he soars to the heights.
billyguns2 3 years ago
the stature of this playing is immense, as is the tone of period Bluthner.
flugelmaniac 3 years ago 3
just incredible!
flugelmaniac 3 years ago 2
Was he really enthusiastic about Bluthners? the only videos i found of him playing is only with Steinways.
libetta 3 years ago
Goldsmith can shove it! Do you have any idea as to what happened to his beloved earlier Bacarolle? I hope it's still in existance somewhere!
themfromspace 3 years ago
Well, the problem is that they played the test recording back to Rubinstein immediately after he had recorded it in order to demonstrate to him how the new electrical recording system was far superior to the old acoustic method. In so doing, the original wax recording could not be used as a master matrix for metal stampers.. Whether HMV preserved this wax, I have no idea. . . . .
Beckmesser2 3 years ago
Can you ever listen to this recording and doubt the glorious self indulgence of this man who wants his cake and eats it too.
clifdavol 3 years ago
I love Rubinstein's playing, but I've never really liked this piece and Chopin in general. When I listen to this I listen more to the pianist rather than the composer.
BachScholar 3 years ago
Haha, Harris Goldsmith. He's never liked Romantic(or leaning) interpretations.
Excellent singing and tone here, I really like 4:00 on and onward...
RabidCh 3 years ago
I really do enjoy Rubinstein's interpretation here, he makes this piece sing!! Thank you.
imusiciki 3 years ago
Rubinstein forever!In my opinion,this is how Chopin and specialy this Barcarolle should be played,amazing!
go9zu 3 years ago
Superb! Was even Cortots version any better?
paulostroff99 3 years ago
Zimerman played this excellent. He was more expressive with his version (you may or may not like that), but it is very good.
TwelfthRoot2 2 years ago