is this really a debate, there is no god. there, the question has been answered, now we can get back to looking into explaining these other questions without having to be told not to because the answer is god.
@SuperDelusionist You should say you don't BELIEVE there is a God there. B/c when you start ASSERTING there is no God the burden of proof is on you too, the same as it is on theists who asser there is a God.
@littlebit19801 UMMM.. no, not at all MY burden if i say "there is no god".... it is a comment based on the fact that god has never been proven to be real, so until then, it is FACT that there is NO GOD.
If i make the claim: "invisible people are NOT real"... would the burden of proof be mine to prove they DO NOT EXIST, or can we all agree that undetectable invisible "people" are NOT REAL.
Your comment is REDUNDANT and is BACKWARDS thinking.
According to YOUR made up invented "logic", any and ALL truth claims would be valid and would have to be proven WRONG to not be possible. This is INSANITY!
Space is made up of invisible, undetectable marsh mellows gathered together and stuffed with hollow holes that do not look like mangos. Prove me WRONG. This is your logic.
[if you get back to me and claim that it would be possible, you are just insane, i suggest you seek help, IMMEDIATELY]
@SuperDelusionist First you don't have to be rude, I'm pretty sure I'm not insane. But this is the way internet discussions go, people calling people "retarded" or "gay" or other childish insults, that you typically don't hear people calling people in real life when they debate. But back on topic, no I don't BELIEVE invisible people exist, BUT do I know for a fact they don't exist ANYwhere in the universe at anytime? NO! If I start ASSERING they do not exist, yeah I have the burden of proof.
@SuperDelusionist Now if I simple say, I don't BELIEVE invisible people exist, or I LACK a belief in invisible people, then, no I don't have a burden of proof.
I also wanted to say that the guy in this video has some points, but to say that a person in ancient times would be retarded to someone now is a hasty judgement. They were very intelligent people and just had a different way of life.
People really need to know that evolution is just as much faith based as is every other religion..
I'm not saying you're stupid, or atheists are stupid, because there's a big difference between being stupid and being wrong. I'm an intelligent being, but that does not mean I do not get things wrong. Point being though, the whole "The universe is expanding" is based off of presuppositions that are groundless. This applies to Christianity as well.
Well atheists believe that our world and the laws of physics are all that exists, so it makes sense for someone to question them. If you are not atheist, you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind. Thats why you can't really deny God. :/
@cmadison93 Well I actually can comprehend the physical science and time in which this universe acts in. How am I ignorant by saying there's no way of knowing of any higher power, even if he/it may not interact with the universe? Dont you think it's a bit ignorant to only think there's nothing outside of what we can see?
I think there are many things people take for granted like human consciousness and art and beauty and things like that. Some things i dont think can evolve "lifelessly"
Don't you think it's a bit foolish and arrogant to misrepresent what atheists think?
Don't you think your argument for the existence of God (Belief in things beyond science, and/or things that are incomprehensible.. "Thats why you can't really deny God. :/") is rather foolish as well?
Inability to comprehend and ignorance =/= existence of a deity.
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science the incomprehensible topics.
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science the incomprehensible topics.
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science and incomprehensible topics.
3. Where and when did anyone indicate that there's nothing outside of what we can see? Any claims (such as saying there is nothing or something) about things beyond our possible experience are simply guesses.
Also, your comment of, "Well atheists believe that our world and the laws of physics are all that exists, so it makes sense for someone to question them." shows you have no understanding of atheism or the general beliefs/lack of beliefs in the atheist community.
Why cant the some of the atheists just respect other peoples beliefs, christians that tell other people that they are not going to a wonderful place after they die, are giving the wrong impression of a christan, so to say that christians are monsters and evil people is just over reacting. Im a christian, and i have atheist friends, i have never ever judged them, why would i even judge them, its their decision. So think twice before you judge all christians.
@surly74 What do you think respect is(non offensive)? And if you feel offended, please dont feel offended. Where i come from respect is expected every sec of the day throughout your whole life, and the comment before this one wasnt meant for you, i read through the comments and saw all these weird reactions on the video. I definitely understand where you coming from, what you asking in the videao, i have asked myself that question soo many times. but what i meant is people shouldnt blow it up.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
if people back then were retarded compared to now then we would not exist because as a species humanity would not have survived. every one has a choice the question is while you exist what is true. regardless truth is not an opinion something is lie and something is true. we have heard many sides i would say its more important to know that while you have chance on know the truth be sure it is. no matter what there is always a reaction no such thing is silence
I was going to laugh hysterically at how stoned you are and give you a down arrow but then I saw the Beatles poster in the background and it totally made me give you a thumbs up :) Kudos and enjoy the potato chips from the gas station.
The universe came from a quantum fluctuation that caused the big bang.
Statistically since this god thingy is said to be ultimate in every attribute then this undefined God-thingy is ultimately less probable than what science already knows
People are in denial, they don't want to believe that their God they believed in all this time is just a big fake. Like Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, etc. lol loved yur video btw =)
I used to think like you when I was a kid. Atheist and authoritarian theist really have to do their research. Stop putting yourself into an ignorant category and stand up. I am seeing a major lack of integration into many peoples statements. If you are open minded than you can see how they all connect very simply. Now, that will not give you the answer to anything, but neither will not understanding the big bang theory or questioning it For YOURSELF. or questioning god FOR YOURSELF. followers
DUDE, dont waste your pointless existence worrying about what created GOD, a true believer in god wouldn't even be able to answer that question including all religions... but i will tell u that the BIG BANG THEORY is just an illusion to controll IDIOTS like you minds and so called answer that endless question about what created the universe and it's contents... science was created by man, god created man... GOODBYE
WOW you are incompetent, there is no proof of GOD or evolution,therefore,they are equally possible,however,more evidence points to God,and less to evolution,They found a footprint in America older than man is supposed to be,On the other hand,they have found an artifact mentioned in the BIBLE in which a man used while paying homage to another god.
We know where neither God nor a universe without God would have come from, but I would certainly prefer the former to be true. And of course I'm not basing my beliefs on preference or opinion: I have heard and witnessed an astounding amount of evidence pointing towards the existence of God, including the fact that he's changed the lives of trillions of people over the past millennia.
And whether or not you despise someone for converting to Christianity, they often do truly become better people.
Theres NOTHING impossible for God! He created ALL things. A maker cannot make himself,then there must be someone who made him.Its a routin! seen from a man's POV.Then tell me, how about the afterlife?Is there an ending?We are HUMAN,and there are things that we cannot understand because our brain is so small compaired to Gods'.On Earth,on this planet,there is always an ending if there is a beginning.But spiritual things cannot be explained and understood unless we be God,just like miracles. TRUTH
@abchachimitsu if you pretend that God can create itself, then I'm allowed to think that the universe created itself. And don't use the word TRUTH while making a religious statement, try FAITH instead. Something that cannot be proven is NEVER a truth. And there still isn't a tiny shred of evidence for the existence of any god. Not one.
Theres NOTHING impossible for Thor! He created ALL things. A maker cannot make himself,then there must be someone who made him.Its a routin! seen from a man's POV.Then tell me, how about the afterlife?Is there an ending?We are HUMAN,and there are things that we cannot understand because our brain is so small compaired to Thors.But spiritual things cannot be explained and understood unless we be Thor,just like miracles. TRUTH
I'm tired of the debate. The evidence is so overwhelming obvious that religions are nothing but a bunch of backwards, disgusting, monstrous loads of bullshit. Anyone who actually reads them and cannot see that they are packed full of EVIL ass shit that only a violent selfish and vindictive human culture could come up with, is a moron not worth salvaging. Move to New Zealand like i did where almost every person is an implicit atheist. Implicit because its a total non-issue here.
athiest are products of the world that satan currently dominates. satan controls many people of the christian religion. a lot of athiests are intelligent but it doesnt make up for their ignorance. i imagine not a lot of athiests read the bible and understand the important parts because you first have to have faith that the words are real and correct. i imagine they see those christians who satan has control of and they see the man made image of god that the churches have given us and denounc
@927daviddivad729 How do you determine the 'important parts' of the bible. A man decides, yes? So if a man decides which parts of the bible are relevant then it is human, not divine revelation. Atheists are not ignorant or blind, they have merely moved on from stone age propositions. I have been to churches and read the bible, it is not impressive, it is disjointed, contradictory and in many places downright evil, there is good stuff too, but you have to be a humanist to know what that stuff is.
@mattshark100 if people decide ,then wouldnt it be more normal to believe people that tell u things that they've proven like scientists, instead of listening to people picking parts of a book with no factual evidence that hasnt been debunked in the last 500 years, I mean go faithheal some more of ure kids in america cause u cant afford normal med anyway, i'm just happy europe got rid of christianity , all churches empty 1 priest for every 5 churches gtfo of my country u pedo's. :)
So much ignorance in one post, oh goody. First off, Man does not, in fact, decide what is important in the Bible because it's all important, cover to cover. As for your next point, I agree, atheists are not ignorant or blind, I just believe they're wrong. Finally, by you saying the Bible is not impressive, it proves your ignorance to either the definition of impressive, or history. Also, I challenge you to find contradictory passages. Call me out, it's for both our benefit.
you said matter didnt exist so god couldnt exist but i dont think god is matter, more like energy. black/white, hot/cold, happy/sad, right/wrong, god/satan, drunk/sober, living/dying. i believe atheism is wrong.
Dude you really seem like you know what your talking about SINCE YOU'RE READING IT ALL.IDIOT! You need to at least appear to be intelligent if you want to persuade people.
People back then were not retarded, think of the guy or girl who invented the wheel, or whoever came up with the idea that fire could be created, or iron melted, food grown, star movements measured and such. And I don't think that they would've died from the common cold. Maybe if it resulted with pneumonia but then again that's how WE die from the common cold.
Here is my very simple question to you, as you are the people who are supposed to know this shit. Why are you asking us who don't believe in God? Aren't YOU supposed to know this? You present the theory, and conclusion of Gods existence, and you ask US to prove you're right? Ask your self this, where did God come from to you? Is it more possible that God is made up in your mind, than actually being in existence? Gather evidence for both claims, add them up, and you might be surprised.
Man was invented by God. God is and was, something far beyond your realm of perception so go waste some more brain cells and fire up another joint there Bob Marley.
im with you man!! jesus did exsist i think.. but he was obviously a crazy man.. =) why else would they not respect him? Atheiest = smart fearless person. God lover = crazy fool!! =)
The universe must have proceeded from something else (if the big bang was true)…. Something other than matter.. Something super natural, timeless, omnipresent.. You might say.. That “super natural” thing doesn’t default to God.. But based on our understanding of the nature of God there is no other logical conclusion.. Btw look at ancient stone work... They were able to accomplish things that we can’t do with modern technology.
@tse93s Man!, you are Wrong!. The big bang came from a colision of Interdimensional sheets in a higher dimension than ours... (M Theory, and String Theory power!)
@Cisser My biggest thing is that Atheists can take science back to a point... then COP out by saying "something else made this possible that we don't understand yet" I can just as logically throw on God.. as you can Science.. And are you agreeing with this kid that people back then are "retarded" do we really need to go there? have you learned nothing from history? they were smart people..
Sorry, I am from spain and i didnt understand well what you tried to say to me... Homo Sapiens Sapiens is the same. If a ancient greek was born today he would have the same brain power as we do. The only thing, today we have much more stimulus for the development of our minds (youtube, University, free spech, a high amount of information stored, Etc) For example, you dont have to figure out that the world is a sphere...Someone already did, so you can move along to me profound things....
@tse93s I agree i dont understand the universe, but so you do...the diference is: I say "i dont know" and you say "As i cant figure out a logical answer, it had to be god"
In theory matter can be created from nothingness....... as the anti-matter reacts with the matter there si so much energy faar too much energy that if you aply the relativity theory of Einstein the matter would be multiplied several times of the matter used to the reaction. That is supposed to be the big bang.... now that is as far as we can get... for now... so at least religion and sience get to 1 point... there is a duality in the universe... matter and anti-matter...
God is holy,supernatural, and all powerful.It makes since that he could exist. Rocks,chemicals,particles. Those are not anything holy,supernatural,or all powerful. How could those exist?
I have written a book that explains how the universe started from nothing. It is simple and relatively easy to understand, and contains no B.S. I got to the answer using scientific explanations about the nature of the universe that have been studied for decades now. The title is” The Answer to 42”. You can find it at Lulu.com. Thank you and enjoy!
Oh my god, like, if you took a person from back then, like they'd be like, oh god, I'm so stoned. fuck. I mean, if you took a person from, omg, ha! yeah..
@trainwreckteeth THIS IS THE MOST INGORANT OF ALL TIME COMMENT I'VE EVER READ ON MY LIFE... EVERY ONE WHO THUMBS UP THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A DUMB MINDLESS ATHEIST... RETARDED MINDFUCKS !
Actually it is possible for something to have existed eternally (although the evidence indicates that the universe as we know it did not), and it is also possible for the universe to have created itself (and, actually, some recent- within the last 10 years or so- cosmological evidence indicates that the universe has precisely the type of topology necessary for this to happen, so it is looking like a possibility, albeit far from demonstrated).
sooooo ya, people back then, if u take someone from back then, n compare them with people today..they would b like retarded...sooooo ya...lmao.. u make perfect sense....
@cristiandavg mj really helps to expand creativity and come up with kickass solutions. just don't operate machinery or program a computer when doing it. FUCK!! lol.
Dude, you can not put a not-temporal and not-material being in Time, or a place. You can not ask for His beginning, as long you do not understand what means being out of our human dimensions. We think related to time, material.
But hei, all comments on Youtube will make someday a novel. Just give them time to evolve...
@BeniaminQB And of course, if something is cannot be put in time or space then we cannot know the slightest bit of information about it, since all of our information comes from time and space. So it is, in your eyes, impossible to know anything about god... and yet (judging by your capitalization of "his" although I could be wrong about this) you seem to think you do know something... curious.... also, a crucial component of evolutionary biology is sexual reproduction... I don't know [cont]
@LeonhardEuler1 Maybe thats why God sent His Son as a temporal-material being here on Earth, to allow us to be able to know Him. In Jesus you can see God, understand His reasons, His intentions with you. Thats all you have to know: "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father;" (John 14:8)
@BeniaminQB In regards to the Jesus thing, that's fantastic if you believe that- go right ahead- but you'd require something a bit more substantial than "I say so" in order for others to be justified in believing you (and it seems to contradict the whole "god is non-temporal, non spatial thing, but whatever- don't feel like getting into that). Regarding the big bang, thanks for the compliment, but I'm afraid it is perfectly possible (and heavily supported by evidence). 祝你生活順心。
The thing is that the question of where god came from is irrelevant to the theist. He is not bound to logic. God, the word in itself, can be the answer to anything for him. That's why debating with theists is so utterly pointless to begin with.
lol ... what a conundrum. Don't worry, dude, even us christians don't have the empirical data to know that question. We all just need to get along. Let's show compassion like Jesus as we journey and explore the world like Darwin, right? Then hopefully, if we as humanity are smart enough, we can continue to pass the knowledge over to our future generations whom may one day find the solution. =) Let's live in the moment.
The big bang is ridiculous, the whole universe was once the size of a pin head? come on, Im an Atheist/agnostic but the big bang is crazy and made up by some loony in the 1950s, I dont know how it started but I do know it wasn't from a big bang, logic tells me this.
@Kyee71 big bang theory is widely accepted across the board by scientists. it is the basis for a lot of relativity and string theory, so yeah. one more thing, the big bang theory does not describe the beginning of the universe. it was never designed for that purpose. it simply describes everything that happened after "the big bang". it does not describe the original singularity or even hope to. we are searching for that through string theory and other new gravity theories.
@Kyee71 have you ever heard of a black hole? imagine a black-hole 10 billion times the mass of our sun; ALL this mass, will eternally* be compressed into a single 1-dimensional POINT in space*. ... now we KNOW these exist (blackholes, not singularities). So I ask you, is it logic, or ignorance that leads you to believe the big bang is impossible.
Source: PHD in Theoretical Physics
I wanted to keep it simple, but I can elaborate if you still have questions.
@AdamPhool everybody should know that the big bang came from a black hole and that we don't live in an 11-dimensional universe. only one dimension of spacetime suffices for TOE. duh.
Background radiation of a frequency matching that expected from the big bang, and the red shift of all other galaxies representing symmetrical expansion from a single point, represent empirical evidence to back up the big bang theory, which actually does indeed fit with physical laws as understood using quantum theory and relativism. As for what came before the Big Bang - Stephen Hawking says it's like asking what is south of the south pole, as time and space were both created at the Big Bang.
The thing is that Naturalists MUST follow natural laws, hence you must be able to account for matter and where it comes from if you do not deem a super natural cause. This is what the guy was asking for.
God himself is supernatural, (meaning above nature / natural laws) therefore it is utterly STUPID that people ask, "Who created God?" since to be supernatural means that the laws of nature requiring such do not apply, (above natural laws). Seriously its not logical!
BB "theory" (it isn't a theory as it has no direct EMPIRICAL evidence)
Defies the laws of physics from the onset. At its very core on the simplest level they are claiming that matter "poofed" into existance Um thats "magic"!
Furthermore, the NATURAL state of the universe is to increase in entropy, (aka Chaos or randomness). Entropy can NEVER decrease, therefore how is it that the universe was created NATURALLY with a preponderance of ORDER instead of chaos? It should just be random at the start
Please take no offence to this question but are you stoned in this video? :) Just curious :)
Awake4Truth 23 hours ago
this shit made laugh so hard and its true
ViCtOrE77310 1 day ago
is this really a debate, there is no god. there, the question has been answered, now we can get back to looking into explaining these other questions without having to be told not to because the answer is god.
SuperDelusionist 2 days ago
@SuperDelusionist You should say you don't BELIEVE there is a God there. B/c when you start ASSERTING there is no God the burden of proof is on you too, the same as it is on theists who asser there is a God.
littlebit19801 1 day ago
@littlebit19801 UMMM.. no, not at all MY burden if i say "there is no god".... it is a comment based on the fact that god has never been proven to be real, so until then, it is FACT that there is NO GOD.
If i make the claim: "invisible people are NOT real"... would the burden of proof be mine to prove they DO NOT EXIST, or can we all agree that undetectable invisible "people" are NOT REAL.
Your comment is REDUNDANT and is BACKWARDS thinking.
SuperDelusionist 13 hours ago
@littlebit19801
According to YOUR made up invented "logic", any and ALL truth claims would be valid and would have to be proven WRONG to not be possible. This is INSANITY!
Space is made up of invisible, undetectable marsh mellows gathered together and stuffed with hollow holes that do not look like mangos. Prove me WRONG. This is your logic.
[if you get back to me and claim that it would be possible, you are just insane, i suggest you seek help, IMMEDIATELY]
Reality SUCKS.
SuperDelusionist 13 hours ago
@SuperDelusionist First you don't have to be rude, I'm pretty sure I'm not insane. But this is the way internet discussions go, people calling people "retarded" or "gay" or other childish insults, that you typically don't hear people calling people in real life when they debate. But back on topic, no I don't BELIEVE invisible people exist, BUT do I know for a fact they don't exist ANYwhere in the universe at anytime? NO! If I start ASSERING they do not exist, yeah I have the burden of proof.
littlebit19801 10 hours ago
@SuperDelusionist Now if I simple say, I don't BELIEVE invisible people exist, or I LACK a belief in invisible people, then, no I don't have a burden of proof.
littlebit19801 10 hours ago
I also wanted to say that the guy in this video has some points, but to say that a person in ancient times would be retarded to someone now is a hasty judgement. They were very intelligent people and just had a different way of life.
papppappful 2 days ago
People really need to know that evolution is just as much faith based as is every other religion..
I'm not saying you're stupid, or atheists are stupid, because there's a big difference between being stupid and being wrong. I'm an intelligent being, but that does not mean I do not get things wrong. Point being though, the whole "The universe is expanding" is based off of presuppositions that are groundless. This applies to Christianity as well.
blackriderd 4 days ago
@blackriderd Actually evolution has proof.
papppappful 3 days ago
u're cute!
BoricuaChiTown 6 days ago
Well atheists believe that our world and the laws of physics are all that exists, so it makes sense for someone to question them. If you are not atheist, you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind. Thats why you can't really deny God. :/
ABR0733 6 days ago
@ABR0733
No....?
Inability to comprehend and ignorance =/= existence of any deity
cmadison93 4 days ago
@cmadison93 Well I actually can comprehend the physical science and time in which this universe acts in. How am I ignorant by saying there's no way of knowing of any higher power, even if he/it may not interact with the universe? Dont you think it's a bit ignorant to only think there's nothing outside of what we can see?
I think there are many things people take for granted like human consciousness and art and beauty and things like that. Some things i dont think can evolve "lifelessly"
ABR0733 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ABR0733
Don't you think it's a bit foolish and arrogant to misrepresent what atheists think?
Don't you think your argument for the existence of God (Belief in things beyond science, and/or things that are incomprehensible.. "Thats why you can't really deny God. :/") is rather foolish as well?
Inability to comprehend and ignorance =/= existence of a deity.
cmadison93 4 days ago
@ABR0733
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science the incomprehensible topics.
cmadison93 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ABR0733
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science the incomprehensible topics.
cmadison93 4 days ago
@ABR0733
Anyway, let's go through your comment sentence by sentence.
1. What does your so-called comprehension of physical science and time even relate to the subject ("you belief that there is more than science, things that are incomprehensible to the human mind.")
2. Did I ever say you were ignorant? How did you come to this conclusion (how is this even related)? In regards to ignorance, I was referring to beyond science and incomprehensible topics.
cmadison93 4 days ago
@ABR0733
3. Where and when did anyone indicate that there's nothing outside of what we can see? Any claims (such as saying there is nothing or something) about things beyond our possible experience are simply guesses.
Also, your comment of, "Well atheists believe that our world and the laws of physics are all that exists, so it makes sense for someone to question them." shows you have no understanding of atheism or the general beliefs/lack of beliefs in the atheist community.
cmadison93 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ABR0733
Your opinions are simply that-opinions. Which don't have a rational and logical basis.
Also, I was criticizing the reason you gave for, "why you can't really deny God.", but you just went off on a bunch of tangents. Kudos to you.
cmadison93 4 days ago
Why cant the some of the atheists just respect other peoples beliefs, christians that tell other people that they are not going to a wonderful place after they die, are giving the wrong impression of a christan, so to say that christians are monsters and evil people is just over reacting. Im a christian, and i have atheist friends, i have never ever judged them, why would i even judge them, its their decision. So think twice before you judge all christians.
AlexanderKruize 6 days ago
@AlexanderKruize
why would i respect your beliefs no matter how ridiculous they may be just because they make you feel good???
No.
surly74 6 days ago
@surly74 What do you think respect is(non offensive)? And if you feel offended, please dont feel offended. Where i come from respect is expected every sec of the day throughout your whole life, and the comment before this one wasnt meant for you, i read through the comments and saw all these weird reactions on the video. I definitely understand where you coming from, what you asking in the videao, i have asked myself that question soo many times. but what i meant is people shouldnt blow it up.
AlexanderKruize 6 days ago
@AlexanderKruize
i'm not offended but would you respect someone that thinks Santa Claus is real? would you not think there is something wrong with them?
surly74 6 days ago
Thunderbolt and lightening.....very very frightening ......diddly- dit- de- de.
119supersniper 1 week ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. If universe is left to itself, all energy will become useless and the universe cannot sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN COME BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Find out why. Read my Pravda Internet article: NASA, FANTASY, AND SCIENCE
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 1 week ago
if people back then were retarded compared to now then we would not exist because as a species humanity would not have survived. every one has a choice the question is while you exist what is true. regardless truth is not an opinion something is lie and something is true. we have heard many sides i would say its more important to know that while you have chance on know the truth be sure it is. no matter what there is always a reaction no such thing is silence
MrCodaq 1 week ago
CHILL THE FUCK OUT MY BRAIN IS TURNING INSIDE OUT HERE!!! GLIP!... I like bacon ._.
Markt666 1 week ago
I was going to laugh hysterically at how stoned you are and give you a down arrow but then I saw the Beatles poster in the background and it totally made me give you a thumbs up :) Kudos and enjoy the potato chips from the gas station.
applecore1977 1 week ago
yea nice one dude :p
12rednas 1 week ago
Just how high are you? xD
AfroDeezeeYak 1 week ago
Fuck.
Forget this guy is an atheist and religion and bullshit.
This guy is hot. AM I THE ONLY ONE HERE THINKING THIS?
Justinisinthebuildin 1 week ago
@Justinisinthebuildin I think you may be as high as he is..
applecore1977 1 week ago
@applecore1977 It doesn't matter because I won't tell either way.
Justinisinthebuildin 1 week ago
The universe came from a quantum fluctuation that caused the big bang.
Statistically since this god thingy is said to be ultimate in every attribute then this undefined God-thingy is ultimately less probable than what science already knows
GodKillerAtheist 1 week ago
People are in denial, they don't want to believe that their God they believed in all this time is just a big fake. Like Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, etc. lol loved yur video btw =)
chelsrowe88 1 week ago
He's so right, fkin love this guy!
Beroe1994 1 week ago
and what did you smok before making this vdo ;)
pulsare21 1 week ago
is no point in any of those topics, some ppl believe other don't. so who fucking cares!
pulsare21 1 week ago
I used to think like you when I was a kid. Atheist and authoritarian theist really have to do their research. Stop putting yourself into an ignorant category and stand up. I am seeing a major lack of integration into many peoples statements. If you are open minded than you can see how they all connect very simply. Now, that will not give you the answer to anything, but neither will not understanding the big bang theory or questioning it For YOURSELF. or questioning god FOR YOURSELF. followers
danthecurious 2 weeks ago
You're hot. Also, you're high. Also, you're right. Though matter can and regularly does spontaneously come from nothing.
jlmadill 2 weeks ago
because religion was created by man...
art1ej 2 weeks ago
Is it just me, or does this guy seem like he is high as a kite?
daltonsbadboy 2 weeks ago 3
@daltonsbadboy and he still makes more sense then most sober christians..funny huh? :)
Zaimren 2 weeks ago
DUDE, dont waste your pointless existence worrying about what created GOD, a true believer in god wouldn't even be able to answer that question including all religions... but i will tell u that the BIG BANG THEORY is just an illusion to controll IDIOTS like you minds and so called answer that endless question about what created the universe and it's contents... science was created by man, god created man... GOODBYE
Parchybangin 2 weeks ago
@Qteri1 Prove it. Also, what kind of tourette's do you have?
trainwreckteeth 2 weeks ago
How much did this guy smoke??
fumastanky 2 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
WOW you are incompetent, there is no proof of GOD or evolution,therefore,they are equally possible,however,more evidence points to God,and less to evolution,They found a footprint in America older than man is supposed to be,On the other hand,they have found an artifact mentioned in the BIBLE in which a man used while paying homage to another god.
xXdigizombieXx 2 weeks ago
Not the most well spoken guy but at least he uses logic unlike all the "believers" out there.
amn0270 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
xWAKIZASHIx 2 weeks ago
We know where neither God nor a universe without God would have come from, but I would certainly prefer the former to be true. And of course I'm not basing my beliefs on preference or opinion: I have heard and witnessed an astounding amount of evidence pointing towards the existence of God, including the fact that he's changed the lives of trillions of people over the past millennia.
And whether or not you despise someone for converting to Christianity, they often do truly become better people.
Arkatox 2 weeks ago
His final point regarding "retards" certainly was brazen...
PapaWilk 3 weeks ago
Theres NOTHING impossible for God! He created ALL things. A maker cannot make himself,then there must be someone who made him.Its a routin! seen from a man's POV.Then tell me, how about the afterlife?Is there an ending?We are HUMAN,and there are things that we cannot understand because our brain is so small compaired to Gods'.On Earth,on this planet,there is always an ending if there is a beginning.But spiritual things cannot be explained and understood unless we be God,just like miracles. TRUTH
abchachimitsu 3 weeks ago
@abchachimitsu if you pretend that God can create itself, then I'm allowed to think that the universe created itself. And don't use the word TRUTH while making a religious statement, try FAITH instead. Something that cannot be proven is NEVER a truth. And there still isn't a tiny shred of evidence for the existence of any god. Not one.
globin3 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@abchachimitsu
Theres NOTHING impossible for Thor! He created ALL things. A maker cannot make himself,then there must be someone who made him.Its a routin! seen from a man's POV.Then tell me, how about the afterlife?Is there an ending?We are HUMAN,and there are things that we cannot understand because our brain is so small compaired to Thors.But spiritual things cannot be explained and understood unless we be Thor,just like miracles. TRUTH
rubberbaby00 3 weeks ago
@abchachimitsu thank you
Parchybangin 2 weeks ago
I'm tired of the debate. The evidence is so overwhelming obvious that religions are nothing but a bunch of backwards, disgusting, monstrous loads of bullshit. Anyone who actually reads them and cannot see that they are packed full of EVIL ass shit that only a violent selfish and vindictive human culture could come up with, is a moron not worth salvaging. Move to New Zealand like i did where almost every person is an implicit atheist. Implicit because its a total non-issue here.
AmishRiot 3 weeks ago 28
@AmishRiot I don't know you sir, but I like you.
tbearpartytime 2 weeks ago
@AmishRiot My heartiest kudos to you fo your very true comment.
annabelSPNlover 2 weeks ago
OMG! Is this guy just really high!?!
woodsxxii 3 weeks ago
The writers of the bible are retarded, good call
mattshark100 3 weeks ago
Best answer I've seen in awhile...no pretention, honest and true. The better man always acknowledges what he does not know.
petroniaskho 3 weeks ago
In the beginning, Man created Dog.
petroniaskho 3 weeks ago
athiest are products of the world that satan currently dominates. satan controls many people of the christian religion. a lot of athiests are intelligent but it doesnt make up for their ignorance. i imagine not a lot of athiests read the bible and understand the important parts because you first have to have faith that the words are real and correct. i imagine they see those christians who satan has control of and they see the man made image of god that the churches have given us and denounc
927daviddivad729 3 weeks ago
@927daviddivad729 How do you determine the 'important parts' of the bible. A man decides, yes? So if a man decides which parts of the bible are relevant then it is human, not divine revelation. Atheists are not ignorant or blind, they have merely moved on from stone age propositions. I have been to churches and read the bible, it is not impressive, it is disjointed, contradictory and in many places downright evil, there is good stuff too, but you have to be a humanist to know what that stuff is.
mattshark100 3 weeks ago 21
@mattshark100 if people decide ,then wouldnt it be more normal to believe people that tell u things that they've proven like scientists, instead of listening to people picking parts of a book with no factual evidence that hasnt been debunked in the last 500 years, I mean go faithheal some more of ure kids in america cause u cant afford normal med anyway, i'm just happy europe got rid of christianity , all churches empty 1 priest for every 5 churches gtfo of my country u pedo's. :)
berndvanhoof 1 week ago
@mattshark100
So much ignorance in one post, oh goody. First off, Man does not, in fact, decide what is important in the Bible because it's all important, cover to cover. As for your next point, I agree, atheists are not ignorant or blind, I just believe they're wrong. Finally, by you saying the Bible is not impressive, it proves your ignorance to either the definition of impressive, or history. Also, I challenge you to find contradictory passages. Call me out, it's for both our benefit.
blackriderd 4 days ago
this is a pathetic video response, some dumbass thinks he's smart, but it was a good waste of my time, thanks
Shwayzebananas 3 weeks ago
We can only see things from the human perspective. Its all an illusion. We know nothing. If you think you know your a fucking naive
nutritioaltherapist 3 weeks ago
thank you dr. spicoli
sergeanthugostiglitz 3 weeks ago
lol... not exactly richard dawkins or christopher hitchens...
sergeanthugostiglitz 3 weeks ago
you said matter didnt exist so god couldnt exist but i dont think god is matter, more like energy. black/white, hot/cold, happy/sad, right/wrong, god/satan, drunk/sober, living/dying. i believe atheism is wrong.
927daviddivad729 4 weeks ago
@927daviddivad729 Matter is energy.
Jigmin 3 weeks ago
I strongly believe that Man created God to give hope for us when everything is lost.
xTheBeserkerx 4 weeks ago
In the beginning God created man.=LOLOLOLOL
In the beginning Man created god. = Ahhhhh (thought provoking ahhh)
DrazhiHD 4 weeks ago
Nice teddy bear in the background...
TheSonicjunkie2011 4 weeks ago
Dude you really seem like you know what your talking about SINCE YOU'RE READING IT ALL.IDIOT! You need to at least appear to be intelligent if you want to persuade people.
rileyc71 1 month ago
Lazy college senior^
REDDIT WUZ HERE
theghostog 1 month ago
mind if i answer??? =D
God came from a book!
Ansi1709 1 month ago
Haha I enjoyed. Thanks man!
GibsonGuitarist666 1 month ago
people still die from the cold, unfortunately... or fortunately im not sure.
Vermin298 1 month ago
Well said, Tebow!
jellyfishofdeath 1 month ago
ZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!............
dubsity280 1 month ago
People back then were not retarded, think of the guy or girl who invented the wheel, or whoever came up with the idea that fire could be created, or iron melted, food grown, star movements measured and such. And I don't think that they would've died from the common cold. Maybe if it resulted with pneumonia but then again that's how WE die from the common cold.
BradTroika 1 month ago
Magic book vs real, documented, scientific evidence. The Big Bang wins.
Mxlsptlk 1 month ago
@Mxlsptlk how that we came from monkeys? that makes alot of sense................
ani1616 4 weeks ago
I love how a baked atheist still made more sense than most creationists
Bigigity323 1 month ago
lmao this guy is baked and blazed like a mother fucker. give me some brah, share the love :D
CiMBoMTurkiye93 1 month ago
sequential evidence is still more evidence that Christianity.
thefox4114 1 month ago
I totally agree with you, c:
NeonTurtle2011 1 month ago
Here is my very simple question to you, as you are the people who are supposed to know this shit. Why are you asking us who don't believe in God? Aren't YOU supposed to know this? You present the theory, and conclusion of Gods existence, and you ask US to prove you're right? Ask your self this, where did God come from to you? Is it more possible that God is made up in your mind, than actually being in existence? Gather evidence for both claims, add them up, and you might be surprised.
CetilLee 1 month ago
i like how he keeps swinging around in his chair, makes everything extra convincing
epicturtlecanfly 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Man was invented by God. God is and was, something far beyond your realm of perception so go waste some more brain cells and fire up another joint there Bob Marley.
bronxrunner9 1 month ago
Comment removed
bronxrunner9 1 month ago
this video makes me crave a joint for some reason
S01idsnake 1 month ago
This dude is stoned.
kusalaviro 1 month ago
@kusalaviro or he really needs to take a piss :)
Dragonangel426 1 month ago
im with you man!! jesus did exsist i think.. but he was obviously a crazy man.. =) why else would they not respect him? Atheiest = smart fearless person. God lover = crazy fool!! =)
evilkazius 1 month ago
Comment removed
tse93s 1 month ago
Expanding into????? What?
The universe must have proceeded from something else (if the big bang was true)…. Something other than matter.. Something super natural, timeless, omnipresent.. You might say.. That “super natural” thing doesn’t default to God.. But based on our understanding of the nature of God there is no other logical conclusion.. Btw look at ancient stone work... They were able to accomplish things that we can’t do with modern technology.
tse93s 1 month ago
@tse93s Man!, you are Wrong!. The big bang came from a colision of Interdimensional sheets in a higher dimension than ours... (M Theory, and String Theory power!)
Cisser 1 month ago
@Cisser My biggest thing is that Atheists can take science back to a point... then COP out by saying "something else made this possible that we don't understand yet" I can just as logically throw on God.. as you can Science.. And are you agreeing with this kid that people back then are "retarded" do we really need to go there? have you learned nothing from history? they were smart people..
tse93s 1 month ago
Sorry, I am from spain and i didnt understand well what you tried to say to me... Homo Sapiens Sapiens is the same. If a ancient greek was born today he would have the same brain power as we do. The only thing, today we have much more stimulus for the development of our minds (youtube, University, free spech, a high amount of information stored, Etc) For example, you dont have to figure out that the world is a sphere...Someone already did, so you can move along to me profound things....
Cisser 1 month ago
@tse93s Yes....Very impresive space ships where build by the Zulu tribes....
Cisser 1 month ago
@tse93s I agree i dont understand the universe, but so you do...the diference is: I say "i dont know" and you say "As i cant figure out a logical answer, it had to be god"
Cisser 1 month ago
In theory matter can be created from nothingness....... as the anti-matter reacts with the matter there si so much energy faar too much energy that if you aply the relativity theory of Einstein the matter would be multiplied several times of the matter used to the reaction. That is supposed to be the big bang.... now that is as far as we can get... for now... so at least religion and sience get to 1 point... there is a duality in the universe... matter and anti-matter...
Andresdante1991 1 month ago
God is holy,supernatural, and all powerful.It makes since that he could exist. Rocks,chemicals,particles. Those are not anything holy,supernatural,or all powerful. How could those exist?
XdynomightX 1 month ago
By rocks smashing each other and making earth is impossible God comes from heaven
AngelicKid61 1 month ago
God was always there, God is infinite, and he is also timeless
joo01991 1 month ago
lol 1:09 is the epiphany :)
Catpanl 1 month ago
your a dumbass he wasnt talking about the bible smh -.-
riddlebox701 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@riddlebox701 "your a dumbass" ... That sentence says it all as to who the dumb ass is.
inEarthCEO 1 month ago
God was invented by man.
trainwreckteeth 1 month ago 72
@trainwreckteeth ...and man was invented by dog. Controversy solved. You can all go home now.
Folficcifreak 1 month ago
@Folficcifreak So very clever, but I'm already home. Thanks anyway.
trainwreckteeth 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have written a book that explains how the universe started from nothing. It is simple and relatively easy to understand, and contains no B.S. I got to the answer using scientific explanations about the nature of the universe that have been studied for decades now. The title is” The Answer to 42”. You can find it at Lulu.com. Thank you and enjoy!
rvm429111 3 weeks ago
@trainwreckteeth Big Ups.
SouLFuzzy 3 weeks ago
Oh my god, like, if you took a person from back then, like they'd be like, oh god, I'm so stoned. fuck. I mean, if you took a person from, omg, ha! yeah..
timsea81 3 weeks ago
@trainwreckteeth THIS IS THE MOST INGORANT OF ALL TIME COMMENT I'VE EVER READ ON MY LIFE... EVERY ONE WHO THUMBS UP THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A DUMB MINDLESS ATHEIST... RETARDED MINDFUCKS !
Parchybangin 2 weeks ago
Lmao!!!! Bro.... you are fucking awesome! I would DEFINETELY like to know who do you get your weed from?
LiVeNleRn123 1 month ago
Actually it is possible for something to have existed eternally (although the evidence indicates that the universe as we know it did not), and it is also possible for the universe to have created itself (and, actually, some recent- within the last 10 years or so- cosmological evidence indicates that the universe has precisely the type of topology necessary for this to happen, so it is looking like a possibility, albeit far from demonstrated).
LeonhardEuler1 1 month ago
sooooo ya, people back then, if u take someone from back then, n compare them with people today..they would b like retarded...sooooo ya...lmao.. u make perfect sense....
jakesgirl69able 1 month ago in playlist More videos from slmjml
This has been flagged as spam show
@cristiandavg mj really helps to expand creativity and come up with kickass solutions. just don't operate machinery or program a computer when doing it. FUCK!! lol.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
you have to repent
PolacsRarseholes 1 month ago
Dude, you can not put a not-temporal and not-material being in Time, or a place. You can not ask for His beginning, as long you do not understand what means being out of our human dimensions. We think related to time, material.
But hei, all comments on Youtube will make someday a novel. Just give them time to evolve...
BeniaminQB 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BeniaminQB "You can not ask for His beginning, as long you do not understand what means being out of our human dimensions."
---
is you high, bitch? is you motherfuckin' high? get off the shit, man.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
@BeniaminQB And of course, if something is cannot be put in time or space then we cannot know the slightest bit of information about it, since all of our information comes from time and space. So it is, in your eyes, impossible to know anything about god... and yet (judging by your capitalization of "his" although I could be wrong about this) you seem to think you do know something... curious.... also, a crucial component of evolutionary biology is sexual reproduction... I don't know [cont]
LeonhardEuler1 1 month ago
@LeonhardEuler1 Maybe thats why God sent His Son as a temporal-material being here on Earth, to allow us to be able to know Him. In Jesus you can see God, understand His reasons, His intentions with you. Thats all you have to know: "he that hath seen me hath seen the Father;" (John 14:8)
BeniaminQB 1 month ago
@BeniaminQB In regards to the Jesus thing, that's fantastic if you believe that- go right ahead- but you'd require something a bit more substantial than "I say so" in order for others to be justified in believing you (and it seems to contradict the whole "god is non-temporal, non spatial thing, but whatever- don't feel like getting into that). Regarding the big bang, thanks for the compliment, but I'm afraid it is perfectly possible (and heavily supported by evidence). 祝你生活順心。
LeonhardEuler1 1 month ago
@BeniaminQB [cont] about you, but the comments on my screen aren't having sex.... ;)
LeonhardEuler1 1 month ago
@LeonhardEuler1 regarding your comments not having sex, neither a Big Bang will ever create your awesome brain.
BeniaminQB 1 month ago
The thing is that the question of where god came from is irrelevant to the theist. He is not bound to logic. God, the word in itself, can be the answer to anything for him. That's why debating with theists is so utterly pointless to begin with.
ZGoten 1 month ago
lol ... what a conundrum. Don't worry, dude, even us christians don't have the empirical data to know that question. We all just need to get along. Let's show compassion like Jesus as we journey and explore the world like Darwin, right? Then hopefully, if we as humanity are smart enough, we can continue to pass the knowledge over to our future generations whom may one day find the solution. =) Let's live in the moment.
strke4ce 1 month ago
Hi and very cute :)
blueray1969 1 month ago
are you STONED while making this?? ...
MrShaun42088 1 month ago 8
The big bang is ridiculous, the whole universe was once the size of a pin head? come on, Im an Atheist/agnostic but the big bang is crazy and made up by some loony in the 1950s, I dont know how it started but I do know it wasn't from a big bang, logic tells me this.
Kyee71 1 month ago
@Kyee71 big bang theory is widely accepted across the board by scientists. it is the basis for a lot of relativity and string theory, so yeah. one more thing, the big bang theory does not describe the beginning of the universe. it was never designed for that purpose. it simply describes everything that happened after "the big bang". it does not describe the original singularity or even hope to. we are searching for that through string theory and other new gravity theories.
Hinduspy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hinduspy the big bang is from a black hole. the end. why hold on to a fake mystery?
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
@Kyee71 have you ever heard of a black hole? imagine a black-hole 10 billion times the mass of our sun; ALL this mass, will eternally* be compressed into a single 1-dimensional POINT in space*. ... now we KNOW these exist (blackholes, not singularities). So I ask you, is it logic, or ignorance that leads you to believe the big bang is impossible.
Source: PHD in Theoretical Physics
I wanted to keep it simple, but I can elaborate if you still have questions.
AdamPhool 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AdamPhool everybody should know that the big bang came from a black hole and that we don't live in an 11-dimensional universe. only one dimension of spacetime suffices for TOE. duh.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
@AdamPhool Points are 0-dimensional....
LeonhardEuler1 1 month ago
This made me laugh so hard. He's totally high. But correct.
dancingviper18 1 month ago
dude is high!
violentmoxie 1 month ago
Background radiation of a frequency matching that expected from the big bang, and the red shift of all other galaxies representing symmetrical expansion from a single point, represent empirical evidence to back up the big bang theory, which actually does indeed fit with physical laws as understood using quantum theory and relativism. As for what came before the Big Bang - Stephen Hawking says it's like asking what is south of the south pole, as time and space were both created at the Big Bang.
Alex566116 1 month ago
Haha nice vid dude!
chrsmats 1 month ago
Great upload dude! nice conclusion!!!
I have a question for u tho!
Who the fuck is your dealer?????!!!!! LOL
billmalta1 1 month ago 63
@billmalta1 LMFAO i was thinking the same thing XD
kirox777 1 month ago
@billmalta1
yeah he had some good shit, didn't he?
defiantwon33 4 weeks ago
The thing is that Naturalists MUST follow natural laws, hence you must be able to account for matter and where it comes from if you do not deem a super natural cause. This is what the guy was asking for.
God himself is supernatural, (meaning above nature / natural laws) therefore it is utterly STUPID that people ask, "Who created God?" since to be supernatural means that the laws of nature requiring such do not apply, (above natural laws). Seriously its not logical!
Gilbertus1986 1 month ago
BB "theory" (it isn't a theory as it has no direct EMPIRICAL evidence)
Defies the laws of physics from the onset. At its very core on the simplest level they are claiming that matter "poofed" into existance Um thats "magic"!
Furthermore, the NATURAL state of the universe is to increase in entropy, (aka Chaos or randomness). Entropy can NEVER decrease, therefore how is it that the universe was created NATURALLY with a preponderance of ORDER instead of chaos? It should just be random at the start
Gilbertus1986 1 month ago