Paul Mc Cartney is lying, He asked Michael to buy the catalog for Him, but Michael wouldn't have gotten anything financially, from that deal, I think He helped Tommy Motola hire Conrad Murray to Kill Him.
@Rakanmasoud But heatabbed PAUL in the back..Pau ltaught him hw to make money with spong publishing..you DONT dothat to a frend..he had no sense of MORALITY
If some other artist/friend of Paul's bought the catalog, nobody would be complaining. But since it's Michael Jackson who bought it...people go fucking wild and start spewing out the recycled, generic jokes. Please.
This is so sad...I mean i understand child sex abuse and all the other stuff that was definitely true about mj and can see that happening...but buying beatles catalogue?? WTF MJ fucking sucks.....the only legacy mj left behind was abusing some kid -__-
@VeyLaren Wow, can your facts right.. There is no prove what so ever in this intire world that Michael Jackson Sexually touched any child is the sickos like you the 'want' to believe Michael did such a disgusting thing. Get this. 'There is NO prove or any evidence what so ever the Michael Jackson Touched a child inappropriately even google it and do some research before you start commenting on things.
Dammit -- I absolutely SWEAR that I saw Paul do an interview years back where he said none of this really mattered because there was some sort of time limit on the deal and that he was going to end up with the publishing rights eventually NO MATTER WHAT! Has he ever mentioned that little bit of business trivia again ever since?!? - 1b2s
@hiawatha444 oh ya hes a gentlemen, thats why he talked shit about John Lennon for years and keeps talking bad about MJ, a real gentlemen would do that. If it wasn't for John Lennon there would be no Paul McCartney and there would be no beatles I am sorry!!
As I said before I give Paul credit, he was a music genius but why is everyone confused here? THE CATALOG WASN"T PAUL'S!! so stop posting comments defending this stupid guy! I don't give a shit if he made the catalog and the songs but it wasn't his. thats it. very simple. it was on sale. like when you go to the store and things are on sale you can buy them and thats what MJ did. what part of this don't you people understand? my dad build a house and someone bought it, it is no longer his!!!!
whoever badmouths great artists such and MJ and Lennon is a loser. thats right I said it. McCartney IS A LOSER!!!! MJ didn't do anything to this guy, the catalog was up for sale and he just bought it end of the story!! this guy talks about it every chance he gets and tries to make MJ look like a bad guy i don't understand why! he also badmouthed Lennon for no reason for years all the way up till when he died! Lennon and MJ never talked about this guy, because they were a better people!!!
I think that the "stupid fuck" was MJ: he has betrayed his friend and has lost his friendship ( Linda'one too) on the other side what has he won exactly?
@blackgargamel oh ya? how did MJ betray him? do you even know what you are talking about? the catalog was for sale and MJ bought it. how is that betraying? McCartney is upset at the fact that once MJ bought it he didn't give him a raise which he didn't have to. he thought because they were friends MJ would hook it up and MJ simply told him its all business Paul.
Paul McCartney maybe a music genius and very talented but hes a stupid fuck for saying stupid shit about MJ. the catalog was for sale, it wasn't even his and Michael Bought. its not like he stole it! it was up for sale you dum fuck, if it wasn't MJ someone else would have bought it!! can't stand this idiot. he is a jerk no wonder John Lenon didn't get along with him either. He talked shit about Lenon too up till he died. what a loser!
@steve51704000 "I'm a loser. I'm a loser! Although I laugh and I act like a clown, I'm a loser, and I'm not what I appear to be!" -- Paul McCartney (w/J. Lennon)
paul has never REALLY gotten over this, i mean he still talks about hes trying to buy it now while hes dead?!! crazy how much you want to bet he will... sad pauly get over it your a stuck up, washed up, beattle k buddy your done and its sad hes been holding this grudge.....
@Goomba753 Look at them.!Not one of them has any black pigment in their skin. If he used his sperm then they would look somewhat like Jackson before he had all is plastic surgery. Think!
@Goomba753 The kids do have the mother's genes but not MJ''s. That's a fact! Michael didn't even legally adopt these kids until years after they were born. Look it up. TMZ covered this story. The reason he didn't immediatley adopt them was because he didn't believe anyone would claim custody until the white former wife sued him for a custody battle because he was concerned about Blanket being in the custody of his former wife, which she was nothing more to him than a uteras. White donor unknown.
@interstategar How do you explain the fact that his kids have vitiligo then? And don't cite tabloid sites as sources, that's just stupid...his former wife never sued him, and if you watch interviews she says that they are 100% his, too. I am watching one of those interviews right now, actually.
@Goomba753 What sources are you using to claim the kids have vitiligo? Do you have medical records for the kids? Do you have a DNA test in your hands showing MJ is the biological father? What are your sources? Look at MJ before all his surgery. Look at his face, his nose. These resemble MJ is no visual way at all. Give me a list of resources YOU are using.
@Goomba753 I just watched a report from Diane Diamond here on youtube who says she's covered MJ for years. She says MJ hand picked the male donor to impregnate Debbie Rowe, and most of the reporers know the name of him. If this were false, and this is a public report MJ could have sued her boss's company whatever
media compnay that is for millions just for making that statement. Debbie Rowe did bring MJ to court for not paying the full amt to her for being a surrogate. better reck ur facts.
@SkorpiusShow aye did u read the Description guess not.No one really does. Paul and Michael still took pics with each other after that whole thing he wasn't even that mad John Lennons wife was happy MJ bought it. Paul told him to buy someones catalog and he bought his. Its all fair. Paul got over it so can u. No hate on mj. and YOU WILL NEVER BUY out mjs catalog if u were a millionaire lol.
@TheChocolate11 It's unfair that Paul has to pay someone anytime he sings his own songs, which he even stated in a an interview. And although he did say buy someone's catalog- he was quite stunned when MJ bought Paul's own catalog. Well we never know I one day may buy MJ's catalog if I ever amount to Donald Trump money - but by then the catalog would be worth more but you never know he he he
@TheChocolate11 Not if I'm his friend and I'm already rich. An artist deserves to have his own artwork. Paul was mad for a while, he only showed it in one interview I remember, but everything else where he was interviewed or asked about it he just acted like it didn't bother him, because why get show people you are mad about something you can't change. And MJ is so popular you don't want to say anything about him because then you get so much hate.
@SkorpiusShow I was born in England, and love The Beatles, but I dislike the way Paul attempts to play the victim. The Beatles songs were up for sale, Paul and Yoko were to go in together on a $20 million dollar bid, at the last minute Yoko pulled out, and Paul decided not to make a bid on his own. Michael paid $47.5 million, outbidding all others, and aquired the songs fairly. Paul is said to be worth around $1 billion today, so if he chose to be cheap, he shouldn't bitch about it later.
@SkorpiusShow Awesome! Buy Michael's catalog. As Michael once said....It's just good business. I like Michael but I like that idea as well. That has crossed my mind before.
@michael60305 Did I say I didn't LIKE Michael Jackson- no! I just said I hated that aspect of what he did. However, in terms of his personality and who he is as a person- he is amazing.
@SkorpiusShow <D^:( Check out my go tee! Your an evil person to hate M.J. When was the last time you actullay listend to music. Paul and Michael are THEE kings!
Buying the Sony/ATV catalogue was probably one of the smartest moves Michael did in his life. He not only set himself with a lifetime of royalties, but also his children. Although Michael is gone, his percentage of the catalogue remains and his children essentially will never have to worry about things financially.
Say what you want about him, but Michael was a smart man when it came to music.
@rockinrobin337 which really sucks. They don't deserve any beatles publishing money. Neither did MJ and who's lawyers suggested the transaction. Lennon McCartney deserve it ALL, not blood sucking leeches.
All Michael Jackson fans should watch the video "Man behind the myth - Michael Jackson" and share it as far and wide as they can, especially with doubters and haters.
Tell the whole story Paul,especially knowing how people like to take everything "Michael" out of context...Stop being bitter about it, even when the catalog was up for sale,YOU didn´t bid on it.Michael TOLD YOU he would buy it...get over it,he respected you but you couldn´t get over Michael´s sence of bussiness & honesty,whatever!
Paul neglects to mention he had the chance to buy the catalog twice and he didn't want to pay what they were asking. He asked Yoko to buy it with him and she said no and told him to stop being so cheap and just pay the price. Paul and Linda were worth a fortune at the time and $48 million was chump change to them but they still let the catalog sit on the market. Michael was a better businessperson than the McCartneys and Paul should have told the truth.
I dont hate Paul (I am a Beatles fan) but I dont 'like' that he tells this story re the catalogue every time which encourages people to hate on Michael Jackson (see Beatles fb page!). In the transcripts of Holmes A Court (owner of the cataloque) Transaction. Paul (although he had the money) was trying to get someone to buy it with him Yoko who we know did not get on with Paul said no as she did not want Paul owning John's songs, Paul pulled out of the deal and Michael Jackson's bid won.!
@xmjj4eva I don't see how Paul's story here hates on Michael. Michael was absolutely right and Paul validated it here.. it was just business.. Paul seems to have always taken things more personally than he lets on.. look at his relationship with John in the early 70s. But in context here.. I don't see how this would precipitate others to hate on Michael.. just my take on your comment.
Liar Paul - speak to the people who had the music up for sale - they will tell you that you did not bid and Michael did - you have used this as an excuse for too long that you believe it yourself. Shame on you.
@xmjj4eva ay no hate comments on Paul this happened along time ago and in MJs book from 2001 he was talking abt how he admired Paul he has, ever since mj was little. no need to hate on Paul he respected MJ in this interview and said "he was a lovely man massively talented and we miss him".
@TheChocolate11 And Paul says that someone has to take it, I mean someone had to buy it, and Michael did. So, I don´t get why the bitterness? They should keep in touch, being friends, anyway it was just business. And Michael told him he was gonna buy it, so I still don´t get the bitterness...
@TheChocolate11 And Paul says that someone has to take it, I mean someone had to buy it, and Michael did. So, I don´t get why the bitterness? They should keep in touch, being friends, anyway it was just business. And Michael told him he was gonna buy it, so I still don´t get the bitterness...
@TheChocolate11 he said that at the end in like 3 seconds because MJ is dead and he knows its not politically correct to talk bad about a dead person, otherwise the media would eat him alive!!! but he didn't mean it and he didn't care about MJ which is fine to me but somebody needs to tell him to save his bombast for the forum where it matters, this guy has been complaining and crying about this for years for no reason!!!!
Being of the hit-making variety.
WHAT A STUD
dtbllover14 5 hours ago
Actually, since Michael is dead, the songs are now owned by Sony/ATV, not Paul!
MustacheMonster3 4 days ago
"You know... being the hit-making variety..." You have to be a Beatle to have that kind of humor!!!
CuteMcBeauty 1 week ago
have you seen paul´s face at minute 1:35-1:41 ?? like saying ... ohh fuck ! that was a bad comment !
viruloTROVA 1 week ago
billy is very talented but he is no paul mccartney.
MrWuldntulike2kno 2 weeks ago
Paul sounds bitter over the whole deal of Jackson buying his catalog.
rgneufeld 3 weeks ago
Paul Mc Cartney is lying, He asked Michael to buy the catalog for Him, but Michael wouldn't have gotten anything financially, from that deal, I think He helped Tommy Motola hire Conrad Murray to Kill Him.
Gowardh 3 weeks ago
Jeuss...Letterman can be an idiot..he had NO IDEA ??? Michael jackson stole The Beatles song catalog?
DavelovesRealMusic 3 weeks ago
Guyz he bought it not steal it he paid for it so that gives him the right to have it
Rakanmasoud 1 month ago
@Rakanmasoud But heatabbed PAUL in the back..Pau ltaught him hw to make money with spong publishing..you DONT dothat to a frend..he had no sense of MORALITY
DavelovesRealMusic 3 weeks ago
funny MJ bought the catalogue and yet was $500 million in debt when he died. hmmm...
Chunibrow 2 months ago
1:27 Paul admits he's the double and then look at his body language afterward
alexoconnor5 2 months ago
@alexoconnor5 you know the truth !
viruloTROVA 1 week ago
"Do you wanna make some hits?"
Hahaha, Michael is too cuuute XD Love him !
xPrettyMJ 2 months ago 10
" not reading your cards" LOL
gabyz88 2 months ago
If some other artist/friend of Paul's bought the catalog, nobody would be complaining. But since it's Michael Jackson who bought it...people go fucking wild and start spewing out the recycled, generic jokes. Please.
LaughOutLoud385 2 months ago
Comment removed
tiaahuja 2 months ago
Why does Paul Mccartney remind me of Donald Trump?
53398 2 months ago
Paul is so charming ahaha.
SleighJessi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is so sad...I mean i understand child sex abuse and all the other stuff that was definitely true about mj and can see that happening...but buying beatles catalogue?? WTF MJ fucking sucks.....the only legacy mj left behind was abusing some kid -__-
VeyLaren 3 months ago
@VeyLaren Wow, can your facts right.. There is no prove what so ever in this intire world that Michael Jackson Sexually touched any child is the sickos like you the 'want' to believe Michael did such a disgusting thing. Get this. 'There is NO prove or any evidence what so ever the Michael Jackson Touched a child inappropriately even google it and do some research before you start commenting on things.
Squeakynuts 2 months ago
When michael died he gave the catalogue back to paul just goes to show how kind hearted he was
NaturalXSuper 3 months ago 5
@NaturalXSuper did he give the catalog back when he died or before he died? lol don't answer that.
dre4117 2 months ago
3 people have no lives
leanneandreese 3 months ago
hahaha @ the end:
"not reading your cards..."
lol love you Paul!!!
maroon5lovers15 3 months ago
I need to meet this man before I DIE..
jackieawsome 3 months ago
0:16 abbey road my favorite album !!!! whoooo
lalalovesbeatles2 3 months ago
Dammit -- I absolutely SWEAR that I saw Paul do an interview years back where he said none of this really mattered because there was some sort of time limit on the deal and that he was going to end up with the publishing rights eventually NO MATTER WHAT! Has he ever mentioned that little bit of business trivia again ever since?!? - 1b2s
1nceBitten2wiceShy 3 months ago
@hiawatha444 oh ya hes a gentlemen, thats why he talked shit about John Lennon for years and keeps talking bad about MJ, a real gentlemen would do that. If it wasn't for John Lennon there would be no Paul McCartney and there would be no beatles I am sorry!!
hsadeh 3 months ago
As I said before I give Paul credit, he was a music genius but why is everyone confused here? THE CATALOG WASN"T PAUL'S!! so stop posting comments defending this stupid guy! I don't give a shit if he made the catalog and the songs but it wasn't his. thats it. very simple. it was on sale. like when you go to the store and things are on sale you can buy them and thats what MJ did. what part of this don't you people understand? my dad build a house and someone bought it, it is no longer his!!!!
hsadeh 3 months ago
whoever badmouths great artists such and MJ and Lennon is a loser. thats right I said it. McCartney IS A LOSER!!!! MJ didn't do anything to this guy, the catalog was up for sale and he just bought it end of the story!! this guy talks about it every chance he gets and tries to make MJ look like a bad guy i don't understand why! he also badmouthed Lennon for no reason for years all the way up till when he died! Lennon and MJ never talked about this guy, because they were a better people!!!
hsadeh 3 months ago
I think that the "stupid fuck" was MJ: he has betrayed his friend and has lost his friendship ( Linda'one too) on the other side what has he won exactly?
blackgargamel 3 months ago
@blackgargamel He didnt "Betray" Paul... your the Stupid Fuck... Learn you facts Moron !
FillionDollarSmile 3 months ago 2
@FillionDollarSmile thanks for setting these people straight. Oh my God i can't believe why people can't understand something so simple!!!
hsadeh 3 months ago
@hsadeh Ikr... Their a Bunch of Ignorant Little Shits !
FillionDollarSmile 3 months ago
@blackgargamel oh ya? how did MJ betray him? do you even know what you are talking about? the catalog was for sale and MJ bought it. how is that betraying? McCartney is upset at the fact that once MJ bought it he didn't give him a raise which he didn't have to. he thought because they were friends MJ would hook it up and MJ simply told him its all business Paul.
hsadeh 3 months ago
Paul McCartney maybe a music genius and very talented but hes a stupid fuck for saying stupid shit about MJ. the catalog was for sale, it wasn't even his and Michael Bought. its not like he stole it! it was up for sale you dum fuck, if it wasn't MJ someone else would have bought it!! can't stand this idiot. he is a jerk no wonder John Lenon didn't get along with him either. He talked shit about Lenon too up till he died. what a loser!
hsadeh 3 months ago
@hsadeh - yeah. McCartney is a loser. Right.
steve51704000 3 months ago
@steve51704000 "I'm a loser. I'm a loser! Although I laugh and I act like a clown, I'm a loser, and I'm not what I appear to be!" -- Paul McCartney (w/J. Lennon)
[Hey, *I* didn't say it; *HE* did!!!] - 1b2s
1nceBitten2wiceShy 3 months ago
WAIT FOR IT(the end is worth it!).
TheErnieLeblanc 3 months ago
Number 9, number 9, number 9.
MrMattRocker 3 months ago
0:17 the applouse thing didn;t even need to light up
thesinner922 4 months ago
1:49 Audience reaction.....* aaaaaaaaw....*
pErpErpEr187 4 months ago
this is bullshit...
the REAL REASON why he was barefooted is because he wanted to send a message that he was getting "cold feet" in the beatles ;-)
matchbox555 4 months ago
PAUL MCCARTNEY REALLY DIED IN 1966 PEOPLE BELIEVE IT.
juliafudge868 4 months ago
letterman knows what's up. because that's william campbell..
juliafudge868 4 months ago
I love his Michael Jackson imitation. :D
cyphinniganlennon 4 months ago
Comment removed
belglezer 4 months ago
He looks like that sad dog off of Looney cartoons. ;o !
lilmissgaga 4 months ago
@prettygirl95100 You should put that money towards some grammar lessons.
username6510 4 months ago
paul has never REALLY gotten over this, i mean he still talks about hes trying to buy it now while hes dead?!! crazy how much you want to bet he will... sad pauly get over it your a stuck up, washed up, beattle k buddy your done and its sad hes been holding this grudge.....
CrazyGurlRandom 4 months ago
Actually all respect for Paul for speaking so nicely about MJ.
vanillaaahh1 4 months ago
now jackson's adopted kids will get mj's share of the beatles publishing money.
Like they really deserve it. What a rip...
interstategar 4 months ago
@interstategar Adopted? Where did you get this information?
Goomba753 4 months ago
@Goomba753 Look at them.!Not one of them has any black pigment in their skin. If he used his sperm then they would look somewhat like Jackson before he had all is plastic surgery. Think!
interstategar 4 months ago
@interstategar Why do you ignore the fact that their mother is white? And his kids has vitiligo, just like Michael, so your argument fails here.
Goomba753 4 months ago
@Goomba753 The kids do have the mother's genes but not MJ''s. That's a fact! Michael didn't even legally adopt these kids until years after they were born. Look it up. TMZ covered this story. The reason he didn't immediatley adopt them was because he didn't believe anyone would claim custody until the white former wife sued him for a custody battle because he was concerned about Blanket being in the custody of his former wife, which she was nothing more to him than a uteras. White donor unknown.
interstategar 4 months ago
@interstategar How do you explain the fact that his kids have vitiligo then? And don't cite tabloid sites as sources, that's just stupid...his former wife never sued him, and if you watch interviews she says that they are 100% his, too. I am watching one of those interviews right now, actually.
Goomba753 4 months ago
@Goomba753 What sources are you using to claim the kids have vitiligo? Do you have medical records for the kids? Do you have a DNA test in your hands showing MJ is the biological father? What are your sources? Look at MJ before all his surgery. Look at his face, his nose. These resemble MJ is no visual way at all. Give me a list of resources YOU are using.
interstategar 4 months ago
@interstategar Alright, I'll send you links in private message
Goomba753 4 months ago
@Goomba753 I just watched a report from Diane Diamond here on youtube who says she's covered MJ for years. She says MJ hand picked the male donor to impregnate Debbie Rowe, and most of the reporers know the name of him. If this were false, and this is a public report MJ could have sued her boss's company whatever
media compnay that is for millions just for making that statement. Debbie Rowe did bring MJ to court for not paying the full amt to her for being a surrogate. better reck ur facts.
interstategar 4 months ago
I still can't believe people were actually gullible enough to believe Paul McCartney was actually dead. NO ONE could impersonate Paul McCartney.
A little voice talked to me and I was like WHOS THIS?!?! its Michael wanna make some hits?!?
Not reading your cards.
Oh Paul McCartney...I love you.
PaulMcCartney1fan 4 months ago
no need to hate michael, he's awesome!
hildamjfan 4 months ago
A billion dollars worth of jealousy hee hee.
MrBuzzialdrin 5 months ago
So this is him. LOL!
mj1fans 5 months ago
Comment removed
SkorpiusShow 5 months ago
@SkorpiusShow aye did u read the Description guess not.No one really does. Paul and Michael still took pics with each other after that whole thing he wasn't even that mad John Lennons wife was happy MJ bought it. Paul told him to buy someones catalog and he bought his. Its all fair. Paul got over it so can u. No hate on mj. and YOU WILL NEVER BUY out mjs catalog if u were a millionaire lol.
TheChocolate11 5 months ago 15
@TheChocolate11 It's unfair that Paul has to pay someone anytime he sings his own songs, which he even stated in a an interview. And although he did say buy someone's catalog- he was quite stunned when MJ bought Paul's own catalog. Well we never know I one day may buy MJ's catalog if I ever amount to Donald Trump money - but by then the catalog would be worth more but you never know he he he
SkorpiusShow 5 months ago
@TheChocolate11 Not if I'm his friend and I'm already rich. An artist deserves to have his own artwork. Paul was mad for a while, he only showed it in one interview I remember, but everything else where he was interviewed or asked about it he just acted like it didn't bother him, because why get show people you are mad about something you can't change. And MJ is so popular you don't want to say anything about him because then you get so much hate.
cdubmeyer 1 month ago
@SkorpiusShow how care
Jswann770 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow ok but i like his song
Jswann770 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow
What is your line of work?
ESSENCEOFEACHTHING 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow I was born in England, and love The Beatles, but I dislike the way Paul attempts to play the victim. The Beatles songs were up for sale, Paul and Yoko were to go in together on a $20 million dollar bid, at the last minute Yoko pulled out, and Paul decided not to make a bid on his own. Michael paid $47.5 million, outbidding all others, and aquired the songs fairly. Paul is said to be worth around $1 billion today, so if he chose to be cheap, he shouldn't bitch about it later.
JamesRichard123 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow Awesome! Buy Michael's catalog. As Michael once said....It's just good business. I like Michael but I like that idea as well. That has crossed my mind before.
TheThankfullness 4 months ago in playlist his fans
@SkorpiusShow hey be nice if you dont like michael jackson dont watch anything that has to do with him leave your comments to urself
michael60305 4 months ago
@michael60305 Did I say I didn't LIKE Michael Jackson- no! I just said I hated that aspect of what he did. However, in terms of his personality and who he is as a person- he is amazing.
SkorpiusShow 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow im sorry i didnt know what you meant i am like really mad right now i am sorry
michael60305 4 months ago
@SkorpiusShow <D^:( Check out my go tee! Your an evil person to hate M.J. When was the last time you actullay listend to music. Paul and Michael are THEE kings!
Beatlelove100 3 months ago
Buying the Sony/ATV catalogue was probably one of the smartest moves Michael did in his life. He not only set himself with a lifetime of royalties, but also his children. Although Michael is gone, his percentage of the catalogue remains and his children essentially will never have to worry about things financially.
Say what you want about him, but Michael was a smart man when it came to music.
rockinrobin337 5 months ago
@rockinrobin337 which really sucks. They don't deserve any beatles publishing money. Neither did MJ and who's lawyers suggested the transaction. Lennon McCartney deserve it ALL, not blood sucking leeches.
interstategar 4 months ago 2
All Michael Jackson fans should watch the video "Man behind the myth - Michael Jackson" and share it as far and wide as they can, especially with doubters and haters.
Majestaet22 5 months ago
It was so hot he had to take off his sandals ... but he left his sport coat on ... what a clown.
But why was the Beatles catalog up for sale? That would be an interesting story ... I would have though they owned their own songs?
justgivemethetruth 5 months ago
It was so hot he had to take off his sandals ... but he left his sport coat on ... what a clown.
justgivemethetruth 5 months ago
Paul McCartney confirmed for greatest male alive. =P
SciFiFangirlsFTW 5 months ago
Billy, that would be Bill Bray.
TheFever77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i became a man at neverland ranch
DannyGloverIsAwesome 5 months ago
PAUL COULD´VE BOUGHT THE CATALOG BUT DIDN´T!!!
Tell the whole story Paul,especially knowing how people like to take everything "Michael" out of context...Stop being bitter about it, even when the catalog was up for sale,YOU didn´t bid on it.Michael TOLD YOU he would buy it...get over it,he respected you but you couldn´t get over Michael´s sence of bussiness & honesty,whatever!
AnivlA84 6 months ago
Paul neglects to mention he had the chance to buy the catalog twice and he didn't want to pay what they were asking. He asked Yoko to buy it with him and she said no and told him to stop being so cheap and just pay the price. Paul and Linda were worth a fortune at the time and $48 million was chump change to them but they still let the catalog sit on the market. Michael was a better businessperson than the McCartneys and Paul should have told the truth.
Delilah361 6 months ago
I like when everyone said an "Awwwwww and a sad sigh" when Michaels face came up... ;( they care.
AppleSaysNo 6 months ago
♥
♥ #LOL
♥
100JamesX 7 months ago
I dont hate Paul (I am a Beatles fan) but I dont 'like' that he tells this story re the catalogue every time which encourages people to hate on Michael Jackson (see Beatles fb page!). In the transcripts of Holmes A Court (owner of the cataloque) Transaction. Paul (although he had the money) was trying to get someone to buy it with him Yoko who we know did not get on with Paul said no as she did not want Paul owning John's songs, Paul pulled out of the deal and Michael Jackson's bid won.!
xmjj4eva 1 year ago 10
@xmjj4eva Extremely well said. oxo
ukeelady 5 months ago
@xmjj4eva I don't see how Paul's story here hates on Michael. Michael was absolutely right and Paul validated it here.. it was just business.. Paul seems to have always taken things more personally than he lets on.. look at his relationship with John in the early 70s. But in context here.. I don't see how this would precipitate others to hate on Michael.. just my take on your comment.
RJLKMRD 4 months ago
Liar Paul - speak to the people who had the music up for sale - they will tell you that you did not bid and Michael did - you have used this as an excuse for too long that you believe it yourself. Shame on you.
xmjj4eva 1 year ago
@xmjj4eva ay no hate comments on Paul this happened along time ago and in MJs book from 2001 he was talking abt how he admired Paul he has, ever since mj was little. no need to hate on Paul he respected MJ in this interview and said "he was a lovely man massively talented and we miss him".
TheChocolate11 1 year ago 6
@TheChocolate11 And Paul says that someone has to take it, I mean someone had to buy it, and Michael did. So, I don´t get why the bitterness? They should keep in touch, being friends, anyway it was just business. And Michael told him he was gonna buy it, so I still don´t get the bitterness...
mensajekn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheChocolate11 And Paul says that someone has to take it, I mean someone had to buy it, and Michael did. So, I don´t get why the bitterness? They should keep in touch, being friends, anyway it was just business. And Michael told him he was gonna buy it, so I still don´t get the bitterness...
mensajekn 5 months ago
@TheChocolate11 he said that at the end in like 3 seconds because MJ is dead and he knows its not politically correct to talk bad about a dead person, otherwise the media would eat him alive!!! but he didn't mean it and he didn't care about MJ which is fine to me but somebody needs to tell him to save his bombast for the forum where it matters, this guy has been complaining and crying about this for years for no reason!!!!
hsadeh 3 months ago
It's good to hear Paul talk nice about Michael,because this is the truth,we all miss him.
DialovesMikeforever 1 year ago
@EllieJacksonLove oh rlly? cool, glad to be of assistance haha
TheChocolate11 1 year ago