Modern eugenics is not a racist weapon used to exterminate inferior races, but a universal genetic tool that improves the genomes of all races. For example, about 2% of blacks have a gene that enables them to consume large amounts of saturated fat without any rise in the blood's cholesterol. I have very high level of blood's cholesterol and I believe that everyone should have this beneficial gene.
@polka23dot Doubt it. Manyof my friends have a phd and high iq are out of work. Were laid off, or fired becuase they lack emotinal intelligence, social skills, and soecannto even multi task.
@Sexyrealraphead My previous statement was not precise. There is very good correlation between IQ and well paid jobs for IQ lower than 115. On the other hand, there is not much correlation for very high IQ (higher than about 130).
Sorry, my darling, Universities must use SOME FORM OF STANDARDIZED TEST in order to sort through tens of thousands of test scores. An SAT test does not measure a man... it does measure verbal / math abilities... perhaps it could be improved- add a history component. You cannot deny the under-performance of blacks/latinos on all measures of academic tests. There's plenty of CULTURAL reasons for that.
iq tests have lots of flaus.for example lets say u take an iq test when ull have just woke up and eaten ur breakfast(early morning ur brain is in best condition)now....take an iq test when u dont have eat a thing,ur tired and u feeling shit.gettign the point?many facotrs have to be considered such as if u feel happy or not,concentrated or not etc etc in the time of test.also iq tests r attached to personal factors of those who made em.(if u know what that means..im not gona explain it)
@itachiitachi1946 So true, I have tested from 98 all the way up to 130. The time that I tested at 98, I was really high on some weed. I will admit that the ability to be able to learn and retain vast amounts of knowledge- plus integrate them into a solid understanding is very important. I think high schools could turn out professionals if they would teach a field to a student in those four years, instead of so many different unrelated subjects. Four years, 7 hours a day, and 5 days a week.
In order for any IQ test to be accurate, logic suggests any individual who devises such a test must have an IQ greater than the entire set of individuals who are to sit the test.
What happens if one of the individuals who sits this test happens to have an IQ higher than the test's creator?
This is akin to asking a gorilla to devise an IQ test for a monkey.
I promote volunteers and incentives to promote the refusal to make babies in order to save mankind by reducing the population till mankind can control in balance. Words are just straw men today and Eugenics fears linked to crime and racism when it is not at all but in the evil of mankind! when used properly it brings Health and population balance as well as quality of life to they involved as compensation...all you need. Click on my name to learn more.
Psychiatry is a Money hungry, Pseudo science, which only masks the patient with harmful drugs that ultimately make them even worse. Holistic approach + Sprituality = Remedy.
I once told a friend about my concept of a 'smart bomb' that would kill all with I.Q.'s below 100, and all others who were a'holes. He said, "Be careful, you may be among those two groups."
@SIMKINETICS The advice your friend gave you about being careful when you told them about your concept. I think it is beautiful advice. Gave you something else to think about. Good friends do that for each other. Show you your own thoughts in a different light. I like to acknowledge good advice...there is too little of it in this world today. Not enough critical thinking going on these days.
@futbolangel02 Truly, our exchange was in humor, but you make a great point about it. The great power of friendship can be found in delusion removal. Critical thinking, logic & proportion only come from honesty. Inherently, we must all learn to laugh at ourselves with a little help from our honest friends. Read my earlier comment about I.Q.
@SIMKINETICS Thank you. You are truly bright. I read your earlier comment. You have a subtle humor that is nice to come across. I'm slow at processing because I tend to run information through my heart before I run it through my mind. I've been told to keep emotion at bay while testing but I believe that I score as high as I do because I do use emotion combined with logic. Once, with a verbal IQ test, I used my knowledge of music to answer the questions and was scored as a genius. Funny stuff.
@futbolangel02 Don't confuse your emotion with intuition. Intuition is the most valuable part of intelligence, transcendent of learning, and a source of creativity. For some, it is deadly accurate & fast, blasting past step-by-step logic. Very mysterious! Located in the right brain, it is loosely linked to left-handedness. It's been stated that Einstein's intuition was his main gift; his I.Q. was considered at about 157, a very modest number if you consider. I.Q. tests falter at intuition.
Secondly, Eugenics works under the assumption that people have different intrinsic values, and it suggests it knows what is best for the world, say an Engineer vs an Artist or a Politician vs a Mystic who lives in a cave. The other assumption is that there is such a thing as a 'normal' human being, say personality, mental capacity or physical structure.
The truth is that you cant rely on any single test. You set the limits to yourself and thus setting the limit on intelligence. You can improve your brain by eating healthy and may more factors like solving problems. If you stop solving problems, even if your smart, + don't eat healthy then you end up with a lower intelligence. Intelligence is a factor set up by us and our willingness. don't forget people also become nervous taking a test and also may just be worm out b/c of sleep deprivation.
@Crygenetic If people, randomly chosen, are asked what their I.Q.'s are, their average response is north of 120. Technically, the average is base-lined at 100 to establish the standard. Either stupid people don't understand the question & don't respond, or most people simply overestimate their intelligence. I know this because I too am above average!
You've made an excellent association, Dr. Breeding! The link between Eugenics and IQ, is essential in showing why IQ tests are structured the way they are, and why they have been employed for so long.
Hi Dr. Breeding, I just wondered why PSAS / PGAD will be officially recognized in the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which comes out in 2012. Sounds like another made up disorder from big pharma. Maybe worth a video.
@Badwolf182 glad to know another person is immune to the brainwashing. It is up to people like us to spread the truth and make sure that future generations remain free from their george orwell'ian 1984 type society
@prepper1987 In order for future generations to be free from this 1984 type society we have to put an end to it. This is presently a 1984 type society. Not enough people are awake yet to do anything about it. Me showing up at the government's door by myself isn't going to do anything but get myself killed with no good coming from it. I'll die to change this place but I don't want my death to be in vain. Don't want to be considered just some dead gal and everyone carries on with slave life.
Although I find it important for there to be a wide variety in a species, I don't agree entirely with him. He makes a few logical fallacies with his arguments. Just because the SAT and IQ tests were originally developed with eugenics in mind, it doesn't mean that the test is entirely worthless either.
While IQ is certainly a valuable tool, their is growing evidence that it is not a sole factor of higher order cognitive processing. It has long been known that IQ does not correlate well with creativity and high level problem solving ability. IQ is more of an indicator of short term memory capacity, and ignores functions of learning and thinking that involve factors like attention, shifting, and filtering (inhibition), that are related to the prefrontal cortex.
IQ isn't a factor of anything. It is simply a measurement of one's ability to solve problems. While there are some sections of IQ tests that deal with short term memory, the majority of it is dedicated to problem solving ability. It's not intended as a measurement of creativity except insofar as creativity helps one solve problems.
The 'problems' on conventional IQ tests, can only generously be considered as such, primarily because their solutions, are not (hypothetically) unknown. Additionally, there is nothing variably complex, about these 'problems'. There have been many studies that demonstrate their low taxing of working memory capacity, and Executive functions, in general.
Needless to say, you haven't provided any theoretical basis for you argument. Your 'that's just how it is' strategy (?), provide a warrant for the assumption that your merely another pseudo-logician...The garden variety type; whose fabrications have emanated, since the primal age.
That's true, I didn't provide any theoretical basis for it. I merely assumed that you were already familiar with the material we were discussing. I apologize for making such a silly assumption and wasting both of our time.
@zadeh79 " IQ is more of an indicator of short term memory capacity" LOL- I have smoked marijuana almost everyday for 8 years and just scored average of 119 on a few IQ tests. Either I could have been a genius in memory or anti-marijuana propaganda is just what it is, propaganda.
@7255202 The significant effect of marijuana on short term memory, are temporary (ie; stm is only reduced while your high). From what I understand, there is 'typically', only a very small reduction in STM, with chronic marijuana use. However, there is evidence that marijuana use can 'trigger' psychosis, in select individuals. And marijuana use may reduce the capacity for selective attention, which is certainly important to higher cognitive skills.
@zadeh79 I know many lifelong potsmokers and I believe that the individuals thought to have suffered from psychosis due to marijuana use would have got psychosis illness if they had not used it at all or previously had problems. Many people use marijuana to ease the illness of psychosis. Personally I use marijuana to help bi-polor attacks and depression. When I was 10-14 years old I was manic, depressed and suicidal.Never used pot before. Pot helps tremendously to ballance my mind. manic or down
@zadeh79 I have a theory about STM and attention span of those who are high on marijuana. I believe that STM and attention is not reduced at all. The user simply experiences a different perspective. Instead of dialoque, I remember emotions. The user is also far more introspective and sensitive to emotion. For example of perspective change- sober I like to listen to hardrock. When im stoned I like to listen to piano melodies or "hippie music genre's", or even classical. Puts me in the mood.
They were originally devised as scholastic aptitude tests, to show whether a child should be advanced or held back in his education. This guy is full of hot air.
although i do want to point out that i agree with this video completely. i think people get so confused that words arnt real! everyone needs to put words and labels on everything and it causes alot of confusion. words are relative to what each person perceives it as.
words are real because the things they describe are real. if someone unintentionally describes something wrongly, it just means that he perceived it wrongly. if someone describes something in part but to the best of his knowledge, it just means that he perceives it in part. it does not mean that language or words are relative and hold no objective meaning. if you mean that language and words hold no objective meaning, then you can only mean that they do or do not subjectively, and not "really".
i know you most likely didn't mean that actually or directly, but recently i've become very sensitive to the degradation of language stemming from attitude that words are only relative in meaning. i think that words do mean things; it's just that modern psychology isn't old enough to really know how to label everything in one way. as opposed to looser meanings in terms, i think there needs to be more competition in ideologies and terms than there is presently, which is why i like this series.
okay seriously. i like listening to this guy but looking at him is boring. i have to clean up my room while watching his videos or something...lol. Try doing a slideshow type thing to reiterate what he's saying instead of just showing him there. i think i'd raise the quality of the video by much!
Correct, yes the Nazis were elitist & racists in the most extreme sense. To them "your being poor or sick is your fault" meaning blame the victim. That is a mentality that is completely void of compassion. Truth is there is no such thing as a smart or dumb human, it's only a matter of time & a matter of the work that individual invests in themselves before their minds are improved, updated, & transformed. Shoot! Albert Einstein himself failed elementary school math.
Isn't that like saying "there is no such thing as a slow or fast car, it's only a matter of time and matter of work that individuals invest in souping up their engines?" A smart person has invested work in developing his mind, a stupid person has not (unless he is hindered by a genetic problem).
And no, the Einstein thing was an urban myth. He was actually a prodigy in math from a very young age.
Evidence please? Every source that I've been able to find that actually related to his life said that he never had any kind of a problem with school, learning, or understanding anything.
Just because someone can learn well in school, does not mean that they are not 'slow' at absorbing new concepts (and being 'slow' in that sense, does not necessarily equate to dullness). Although school's overemphasize crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence has shown to be valuable in higher order cognitive skills (like relational reasoning, creativity).
When I say Einstein was 'slow', I mean relative to the products of his thoughts. (but not relative to the average person)
Not necessarily relevant, since he wasn't slow by either of those definitions. However, it is true that those who excel at elementary processing tend to have higher abilities to understanding higher concepts, much the same as how those who can read and write are more likely to understand the plot of a complex novel than those who cannot.
IQ is based off of the assumption of intellectual constancy, and this postulate has been violated by recent laboratory evidence, suggesting that processing skills can be honed. In fact, the general correlation between working memory capacity and IQ is fairly low, and it appears as if WMC relies on a nearly completely independent factor: fluid intelligence.The independence of fluid and crystallized intelligence (IQ) aids in explaining 1) the flynn effect 2) school-IQ discrepencies and 3) autism.
No, the concept of a static IQ is based on it, not the idea of the IQ itself. You may as well try to refute the notion of height by pointing out that your height changes throughout your life.
thats because he had ADHD, I strugle to do basic tasks but I can form incrediobly detailed and complex theories and solutions to proplems, and I dont have a third level qualification - because the education system neglects people like me and stigmatises us with things like ADHD......
@uberjim83 Maybe Einstein did fail math because he was more intelligent than his teachers. Maybe he didn't use "their" formulas for coming up with the correct answer so they "graded" him as they saw fit according to their "rules". Just a thought.
@futbolangel02 There's no "maybe" about it, his academic career was never a secret. He did not fail at math. He excelled in class even from a young age. The stuff about him failing is pure fiction.
@uberjim83 I can believe that. That is why I say "maybe" because I wasn't there and I do not know what really happened. :o) Faith plays a part in my thinking because I have to have faith that I'm not being lied to when I receive information. I've become sadly aware that some people that write history are a group of coordinated people that intentionally distribute lies.
@uberjim83 Einstein is widely believed to have suffered from a form of High functioning Autism (Asperger syndrome), where there is an abnormal enhancement of fluid intelligence - the stuff that conventional IQ tests do not measure. In addition, the forensic examination of Einstein's brain has revealed an unusually high ratio of glial cells to neurons, as well as several other anomalies, which all suggest his genius could be attributed to more than simply IQ.
@zadeh79 Not widely believed by people who know what Asperger syndrome is. It's a social/emotional impediment, not a superpower, and people with Asperger syndrome aren't any more prone to high fluid intelligence than anybody else.
@uberjim83 The fact that individuals diagnosed with HFA/Asperger's score significantly higher on tests of fluid intelligence, is practically irrefutable. Just google it, and see for yourself.
Soundly discovered truth has revealed the fact that any & all persons who disdainfully deem themselves the discriminating determiners of the appallingly audacious application of uselessly urinated Eugenics, are by virtue of their dastardly determinations, themselves correctly deemed to undoubtedly be afflicted with severe mental defectiveness & deplorably debilitative cognitive dysfunctions. These things derived from the immensity of their selfishness & the corrupted core of their personhood
They're whacked, due to their self promoting humanism from which they arrive at the regressive demotion to animal, ape status
That mentality reapplied, should cause one to jump over a dollar to get to a dime!
cognitive dysfunction? Ideologically, they assert that "man is inherently good". How then does one explain all of the existent wrongfulness without attributing it to a mental/social construct of man?
The intellectual & economic elitist Eugenicists of the late 19th - 20th wrote the literature presented as the basis for Eugenics. Then, one day some amongst them would have given birth to a few, perhaps, reproduction defects, cretinous children
Time to revise the literature, append an exception clause that explains how occasionally when reproductive conception occurs on the night in which the father had worn a tall, causative top hat. It causes a biological phenomena of cretinous reproduction that historically has been hereditarily preposterously implicit & inimitably, artificially induced
Thus, Eugenics is applicatively necessarily inapplicable for that impeccably reputable bloodline of finely bred, prestigiously pedigreed & specially sired specimens from a demonstrably documented & diligently double-bred, dazzling dam
I see how SAT and other various aptitude tests were seen as racist in the past, but how can they still be called racist today when everyone gets the same education now?
You have to remember that anthropology also started out with a philosophy in eugenics. This is why they were so hot on measuring peoples cranial capacity. But from such racist roots, anthropology has contributed to our understanding of how very similar we all are, as well as our differences. It has cataloged the complexity of cultures and the ingenuity of individuals- and instead of proving the inferiority of some- it has celebrated the diversity of all.
Eugenics is a flawed philosophy because there will ALWAYS be someone who is weaker then the rest.
You could have a room filled with 100 super heroes. And one of those superheroes is the weakest of them all.
The strongest man today, could end up being the weakest man tomorrow. It fluctuates.
A person who wants to exterminate another because he deems him weak and useless. Could end up in that same position tomorrow, when his colleagues deem HIM weak and useless.
The reason is because having this idea that you need to exterminate the weak is pointless and doesn't improve the human race. It just destroys it.
One day you could be the nazi commander killing all of the jews and the weak. Tomorrow you could suffer a serious illness and become crippled and handicapped. Then your colleagues will throw you into the ovens, because your useless. It's flawed.
I'm not religious, but we need to raise each other up, not compete to the death.
Agreed. Besides, weak traits will inevitably phase themselves out, since they don't help a person's genes to get passed on. The strong exist to help and protect the weak, not victimize them.
Judging based on the fact that both of my comments got a thumbs down, we must have a eugenicist roaming these comments.
The strong could not become strong without others help. The biggest and strongest bodybuilder, would never have achieved that without the help of society. He needed the food, the supplements, the gym, the mentorship, the encouragement, the inspiration, the competition, he needed others.
So for a strong person to think that he can shit on other people, is flawed and stupid.
It's the murder of 6 Million Jews (according to an estimate given by a Nazi official in the Nuremberg Trials) PLUS Communists, Social Democrats, Liberals, Nazis in the socialist wing of the Nazi party, the SA (one of the two Nazi party armies), resistance fighters, Germans that were denounced by their neighbours to the secret police, homosexuals, Sinti and Roma, disabled people, later on lots of Russian POWs were murdered (that were not of Jewish origin) and other POWs as well, of course.
watch the video film 1984 which shows our situation clearly!
Ie., 'big brother' -the elites- will MAKE you see good as bad and bad as good. It will make you agree to poison and kill your own children and call that good!!!
let question the hole idea of testing and ask who benifits the most from these activities.... what is it function....and do intelligent animals eat other intelligent animals...and what does this prove.....
Using the example of my ball python, the dumb eat the intelligent. Most snakes are almost purely instinctual, not much going on upstairs. Yet they catch and eat rats, which are quite intelligent (or they're supposed to be, they will shit in their drinking water and nest).
in the evolution of man in the case iraq and nazi germany i would go dislexic on them. i would turn on them, and bring the whole system full circle. i would do this to survive. not because i am cruel person. its a simple plan of a warbird. i would bring in a leveler and turn them to ruins.
Guy says, "wish someone would come along and turn me on to a clue bout what's going on here!". Truth is: What if he never shows up? You need a better plan then that!
Tests are just games. The "scientists" are the game designers. They do research to find the games that single out the population they want "raise up", and conversely, the population they want to "oppress".
Once the identify this game set, the relabel it a "TEST" and the winners of the game as "SUPERIOR".
To help combat those who label their "TESTS" as games, they preemptively declare the skill sets used by the winners of the game as "INNATE" and "UNTEACHABLE".
i am interested in this subject but whatever john breeding is talking about i can not focus on it because i have ADD. please get someone else to rerecord what he said so i can listen to it the hell!
I think a puzzling intelligence can be generative in terms of further understanding, but a gaming intelligence tends to be object oriented and is bound to degenerate due to the limiting nature of winning. Winning intelligence generally will try to defeat or enslave puzzling intelligence. Winning intelligence is more goal seeking and will murder puzzling intelligence. It's the Caine and Able story. The tree of course held the results of gaming intelligence.
There are two different directions intelligence can take. Most folks seem to like the competitive or gaming intelligence. This is based in hierarchy and hierarchal ethics. It is the arm waving, shiny object winning intelligence. This also includes religion since the objects of worship are iconic and drawn from hierarchal models. The other is puzzling intelligence that derives satisfaction from truth like models. Gamer intelligence has little sense of shame and has psychopathic attributes.
I did not know this but when i was a little kid, but i was relatively bright, but was being deluged with dogma, indoctrination, and the associable lies and threats that go along with this. I was 6 yo and i thought the basturds were going to put me to death. Not kidding! These big lies impede a child's intelligence and get them off into who can hurt whom behaviors. Freedom of religion and speech can be very destructive to puzzling intelligence because gaming intelligence impedes creativity.
SAT intelligence... lol. Psychology says that this test is not really a good indicator of intelligence, if you can prep for a test your not going on intelligence but by memory.
I've heard Obama supports/believes in Eugenics. I didn't vote for him or McSame and definitely didn't support Clinton either. I knew they were all on the same team(all CFR members). I "voted" for Ron Paul, despite my awareness that he might be controlled opposition.
However, I do believe in genetic differences between the races. Though the media would like to have you believe otherwise. These tests that are "culturally biased" against blacks, still allow Asians to consistently score higher than even whites.
I'd prefer to call them socialists, as there is a serious misconception of what the term "liberal" means today. It's not really opposite to "conservative" because real conservatives are quite liberal in terms of free market and economy. A lot of "intelligentsia" of that time were dumb enough to be fascinated by Marx's ideas before the results of such madness were obvious.
"Classical" liberals are in fact closer to "Conservatives", as far as their views on personal liberties and freedoms. I agree with your point entirely. Nowadays our views are skewed by a few issues that supposedly dictate our classification as Democrat/Neo-con, when the reality is only a few hardliners fall on party lines within all issues. Thank you for being a voice of intelligence on youtube, there aren't to many on here. That comment was a response to QUERTYWXYZ's comment about Republicans.
Have to say I think the whole way we a taught in schools isn't right somehow, yes it's important to be able to communicate ..Maths/ English and learn some of the other things that schools teach.
It's my opinion not enough emphasis is put on other important areas of life, it all seems economy based, not, ...people based, you know ?
Eugenics using intelligence will not have a drastic effect on the size of the prison population. After all, the criminals who escape detection or justice ARE the ones intelligent enough to do so.
Well i know the IQ test isn't very good, i've taken it three times for my IEP, once for middle school, and the other two in high school. First one was about 120, second 116, and the last one was 133. Three different results for the IQ test kind of show's it's not a good way to measure someones mentality.
Just seems like a test made for puting people in their spots. Imagen if it didn't exist, and instead of calling me retarded, and putting me in a special class they could just help out more.
It's fairly normal to fluctuate within a standard deviation. Some tests are also different. I had a 139 on the Stanford-Binet he's talking about, and then I had a 119, 121, and 123 as my GT scores on the military ASVAB test. Your scores will vary slightly depending on how much sleep you got or if you're stressed out at the time,l but that's not going to drop someone from 120 to 80.
The human mind and body are way too complex to create any sort of test to see if someone is smarter than the other. People are smart in different areas from one another. For instance one person may be a math genius but totally weak physically, whereas another is horrible at math but has amazing physical ability. I don't believe any of these tests show or prove anything as we as people are just too complex for such a thing. I believe we all have the same potential, only use it in different ways.
Another example, society would leave you to believe criminals are all stupid, but in reality many of them get away with crime using their smarts. They devote their mind power to devious tasks whereas you and I use that mind power for more normal things. Me personally, I believe in balance and try to devote a little bit of my mind power to everything in life that I can. This makes me a jack of all trades, but a master at none of them. Maybe by the time I'm 100, I will have mastered them all. ;-)
You'd be even more disturbed by this video, if you knew what a zombie anti-psychotics make people. side effects can't think, can't get out of bed or out of chair, depression. the client can't think well enough to take a step to stop the meds. other people have no idea how devastated the patient is. & they easily blame all the bad things on the "mental illness".
try this is online....
iq-test ro /#705599
KikiZOom 6 days ago
Hutch? is that you?
AwesomeDomm 1 week ago
godwin's law @ 1:33
That was fast :O
But in all seriousness, very interesting video, and very educational. Thank you!!!
6400loser 3 weeks ago
@shaun0728
oribali1 3 weeks ago
Hutch :D
oribali1 3 weeks ago
hutch send me :)
flaren9 2 months ago 33
This has been flagged as spam show
Modern eugenics is not a racist weapon used to exterminate inferior races, but a universal genetic tool that improves the genomes of all races. For example, about 2% of blacks have a gene that enables them to consume large amounts of saturated fat without any rise in the blood's cholesterol. I have very high level of blood's cholesterol and I believe that everyone should have this beneficial gene.
polka23dot 2 months ago
IQ test results correlate very well with the ability to get and hold a well paid job.
polka23dot 2 months ago
@polka23dot Doubt it. Manyof my friends have a phd and high iq are out of work. Were laid off, or fired becuase they lack emotinal intelligence, social skills, and soecannto even multi task.
Sexyrealraphead 1 month ago
@Sexyrealraphead My previous statement was not precise. There is very good correlation between IQ and well paid jobs for IQ lower than 115. On the other hand, there is not much correlation for very high IQ (higher than about 130).
polka23dot 1 month ago
If I was to run against a Jamaican I don't' think I would win the race.
PeekyBooo 3 months ago
Some dog breeds are smarter than others. How do we explain that int he fleshly man.
PeekyBooo 3 months ago
Just note the 6 Million dying in camps in Nazi Germany is a catch-cry term not real figures. It's highly linked to Kabbalah.
PeekyBooo 3 months ago
Sorry, my darling, Universities must use SOME FORM OF STANDARDIZED TEST in order to sort through tens of thousands of test scores. An SAT test does not measure a man... it does measure verbal / math abilities... perhaps it could be improved- add a history component. You cannot deny the under-performance of blacks/latinos on all measures of academic tests. There's plenty of CULTURAL reasons for that.
FuckObama2010 7 months ago
iq tests have lots of flaus.for example lets say u take an iq test when ull have just woke up and eaten ur breakfast(early morning ur brain is in best condition)now....take an iq test when u dont have eat a thing,ur tired and u feeling shit.gettign the point?many facotrs have to be considered such as if u feel happy or not,concentrated or not etc etc in the time of test.also iq tests r attached to personal factors of those who made em.(if u know what that means..im not gona explain it)
itachiitachi1946 7 months ago
@itachiitachi1946 So true, I have tested from 98 all the way up to 130. The time that I tested at 98, I was really high on some weed. I will admit that the ability to be able to learn and retain vast amounts of knowledge- plus integrate them into a solid understanding is very important. I think high schools could turn out professionals if they would teach a field to a student in those four years, instead of so many different unrelated subjects. Four years, 7 hours a day, and 5 days a week.
UniverseOffspring 3 months ago
the biggining scared the cprap out of me
happymanofcool 7 months ago
This dumbass 14 year old said he has an IQ of 260 because hes indian...soemoen please tell me thats the dumbest thing youve ever heard?
demonic41700 7 months ago
IQ tests are still political, corporate instruments used to label people.
How fit are you for the frameworks of the current powers that be...
The yardstick still used is someone's socio-economic status: low status must mean low intelligence...
I have experienced it myself: biased tests, delayed tests, unapt testers.
All methods to discourage, disillusion, or simply to show who has power over you.
And with the aim of putting you away in the lower ranks.
A high score is simply unacceptable.
MCvanVeen 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IQ testing as a concept is flawed.
In order for any IQ test to be accurate, logic suggests any individual who devises such a test must have an IQ greater than the entire set of individuals who are to sit the test.
What happens if one of the individuals who sits this test happens to have an IQ higher than the test's creator?
This is akin to asking a gorilla to devise an IQ test for a monkey.
Logic doesn't lie.
3nasacova 9 months ago
WE DON'T NEED NO.... EDUCATION!!!
youtube.com/watch?v=lwTpZpwjtIE
thebksix 11 months ago
I wish there was a LOVE botton... I love this vid!!! so clearly explained...
lscdelight 1 year ago
I promote volunteers and incentives to promote the refusal to make babies in order to save mankind by reducing the population till mankind can control in balance. Words are just straw men today and Eugenics fears linked to crime and racism when it is not at all but in the evil of mankind! when used properly it brings Health and population balance as well as quality of life to they involved as compensation...all you need. Click on my name to learn more.
Peterwhitlock 1 year ago
eugenics from race, on way to guarantee extinction of a species is eliminate diversity.
ZachariahLogan 1 year ago
Psychiatry is a Money hungry, Pseudo science, which only masks the patient with harmful drugs that ultimately make them even worse. Holistic approach + Sprituality = Remedy.
BOYCOTTFOXNEWS 1 year ago 5
@BOYCOTTFOXNEWS i can't tell if you are joking or just a fucking idiot.
Yressa 1 month ago
@BOYCOTTFOXNEWS
In highschool, I had to write a paper on the American Psychiatry Association and the history of homosexuality.
I will never trust psychiatrists, ever.
6400loser 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
would you like to meet a single mom online naneedj.info
hasanlolane 1 year ago
fuck white people
jhg123456 1 year ago
@jhg123456
You want me to have sexual intercourse with a light skinned person?
Ah, please, I love everyone as much but not THAT much! =) <3
SlipAllCityToy 1 year ago
Thanks. Its kind of ironic that this man is talking about "Positive Eugenics" & his last name is Breeding. Great man none the less.
metalmagic213 1 year ago
lol, that matte needs a simple choker
TheDigitalphysics 1 year ago
i don't think some of you really watched all of this video , your so eager to mention your IQ
monkeydomonkey 1 year ago
I once told a friend about my concept of a 'smart bomb' that would kill all with I.Q.'s below 100, and all others who were a'holes. He said, "Be careful, you may be among those two groups."
SIMKINETICS 1 year ago
@SIMKINETICS That is some beautiful advice from a friend.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
@futbolangel02 Huh?
SIMKINETICS 1 year ago
@SIMKINETICS The advice your friend gave you about being careful when you told them about your concept. I think it is beautiful advice. Gave you something else to think about. Good friends do that for each other. Show you your own thoughts in a different light. I like to acknowledge good advice...there is too little of it in this world today. Not enough critical thinking going on these days.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
@futbolangel02 Truly, our exchange was in humor, but you make a great point about it. The great power of friendship can be found in delusion removal. Critical thinking, logic & proportion only come from honesty. Inherently, we must all learn to laugh at ourselves with a little help from our honest friends. Read my earlier comment about I.Q.
SIMKINETICS 1 year ago
@SIMKINETICS Thank you. You are truly bright. I read your earlier comment. You have a subtle humor that is nice to come across. I'm slow at processing because I tend to run information through my heart before I run it through my mind. I've been told to keep emotion at bay while testing but I believe that I score as high as I do because I do use emotion combined with logic. Once, with a verbal IQ test, I used my knowledge of music to answer the questions and was scored as a genius. Funny stuff.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
@futbolangel02 Don't confuse your emotion with intuition. Intuition is the most valuable part of intelligence, transcendent of learning, and a source of creativity. For some, it is deadly accurate & fast, blasting past step-by-step logic. Very mysterious! Located in the right brain, it is loosely linked to left-handedness. It's been stated that Einstein's intuition was his main gift; his I.Q. was considered at about 157, a very modest number if you consider. I.Q. tests falter at intuition.
SIMKINETICS 1 year ago
Secondly, Eugenics works under the assumption that people have different intrinsic values, and it suggests it knows what is best for the world, say an Engineer vs an Artist or a Politician vs a Mystic who lives in a cave. The other assumption is that there is such a thing as a 'normal' human being, say personality, mental capacity or physical structure.
StevenMorello 1 year ago
The truth is that you cant rely on any single test. You set the limits to yourself and thus setting the limit on intelligence. You can improve your brain by eating healthy and may more factors like solving problems. If you stop solving problems, even if your smart, + don't eat healthy then you end up with a lower intelligence. Intelligence is a factor set up by us and our willingness. don't forget people also become nervous taking a test and also may just be worm out b/c of sleep deprivation.
Hawkx101 1 year ago
Please, view my channel for basics of psychology!
ThEKuHtA 1 year ago
I have an IQ of 125 for a 19 year old, yet I am almost below average on SAT test, were all different :)
yumyumluckycharms 1 year ago
@yumyumluckycharms
Had an IQ test of 132 when i was 16. That was long time ago.
Crygenetic 1 year ago
@Crygenetic If people, randomly chosen, are asked what their I.Q.'s are, their average response is north of 120. Technically, the average is base-lined at 100 to establish the standard. Either stupid people don't understand the question & don't respond, or most people simply overestimate their intelligence. I know this because I too am above average!
SIMKINETICS 1 year ago
I suppose that's zadeh79's version of relativity? ;-)
iquadriviumsociety 2 years ago
Yes, I am aware of the similarity too.
zadeh79 1 year ago
2:37pm Sunday (CST) - Time in Austin, Texas
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
You've made an excellent association, Dr. Breeding! The link between Eugenics and IQ, is essential in showing why IQ tests are structured the way they are, and why they have been employed for so long.
zadeh79 2 years ago
Everything in this video is excellent except the green screen, microphone and compression of the video. The guy deserves better.
PeonProduction 2 years ago 10
It's a blue screen ^^
laura43fun 2 years ago
Comment removed
PeonProduction 2 years ago
Hi Dr. Breeding, I just wondered why PSAS / PGAD will be officially recognized in the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which comes out in 2012. Sounds like another made up disorder from big pharma. Maybe worth a video.
magnoy 2 years ago 2
magnoy
in the DSMM 'climate denier' is now a mental disorder!!!! the whole DSMM is a SCAM
Badwolf182 2 years ago
@Badwolf182 Are you joking?
Anyway this is a bullshit scientology video DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THIS CULT RESEARCH PEOPLE.
These are the same idiots who say psychiatrists caused 911 !! They're nuts!
prepper1987 2 years ago
I hate scientologists and their cult .......hubburd was a crook abd a bid time deciever....
Badwolf182 2 years ago
@Badwolf182 glad to know another person is immune to the brainwashing. It is up to people like us to spread the truth and make sure that future generations remain free from their george orwell'ian 1984 type society
prepper1987 2 years ago
@prepper1987 In order for future generations to be free from this 1984 type society we have to put an end to it. This is presently a 1984 type society. Not enough people are awake yet to do anything about it. Me showing up at the government's door by myself isn't going to do anything but get myself killed with no good coming from it. I'll die to change this place but I don't want my death to be in vain. Don't want to be considered just some dead gal and everyone carries on with slave life.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
Breeding is not a scientologist
MrPiejacker 2 years ago
@MrPiejacker You lie
prepper1987 2 years ago
he is attached to an organisation against ECT, that is associated to scientology,, so your saying he is guilty by association??
MrPiejacker 2 years ago
Awesome video Dr. Breeding!
catgumart 2 years ago
Rspect the truth
Lepiratepoulpe 2 years ago
Word.
Freestyler1a 2 years ago
Although I find it important for there to be a wide variety in a species, I don't agree entirely with him. He makes a few logical fallacies with his arguments. Just because the SAT and IQ tests were originally developed with eugenics in mind, it doesn't mean that the test is entirely worthless either.
Saesegral 2 years ago 3
While IQ is certainly a valuable tool, their is growing evidence that it is not a sole factor of higher order cognitive processing. It has long been known that IQ does not correlate well with creativity and high level problem solving ability. IQ is more of an indicator of short term memory capacity, and ignores functions of learning and thinking that involve factors like attention, shifting, and filtering (inhibition), that are related to the prefrontal cortex.
zadeh79 2 years ago 2
IQ isn't a factor of anything. It is simply a measurement of one's ability to solve problems. While there are some sections of IQ tests that deal with short term memory, the majority of it is dedicated to problem solving ability. It's not intended as a measurement of creativity except insofar as creativity helps one solve problems.
uberjim83 2 years ago
The 'problems' on conventional IQ tests, can only generously be considered as such, primarily because their solutions, are not (hypothetically) unknown. Additionally, there is nothing variably complex, about these 'problems'. There have been many studies that demonstrate their low taxing of working memory capacity, and Executive functions, in general.
zadeh79 1 year ago
Needless to say, you haven't provided any theoretical basis for you argument. Your 'that's just how it is' strategy (?), provide a warrant for the assumption that your merely another pseudo-logician...The garden variety type; whose fabrications have emanated, since the primal age.
zadeh79 1 year ago
That's true, I didn't provide any theoretical basis for it. I merely assumed that you were already familiar with the material we were discussing. I apologize for making such a silly assumption and wasting both of our time.
uberjim83 1 year ago
Get lost, and go regurgitate your way through college.
zadeh79 1 year ago
@zadeh79 " IQ is more of an indicator of short term memory capacity" LOL- I have smoked marijuana almost everyday for 8 years and just scored average of 119 on a few IQ tests. Either I could have been a genius in memory or anti-marijuana propaganda is just what it is, propaganda.
7255202 1 year ago
@7255202 in case someone wonders. No, I did not take the test while high on marijauna, but I did smoke last night XD
7255202 1 year ago
@7255202 The significant effect of marijuana on short term memory, are temporary (ie; stm is only reduced while your high). From what I understand, there is 'typically', only a very small reduction in STM, with chronic marijuana use. However, there is evidence that marijuana use can 'trigger' psychosis, in select individuals. And marijuana use may reduce the capacity for selective attention, which is certainly important to higher cognitive skills.
zadeh79 1 year ago
@zadeh79 I know many lifelong potsmokers and I believe that the individuals thought to have suffered from psychosis due to marijuana use would have got psychosis illness if they had not used it at all or previously had problems. Many people use marijuana to ease the illness of psychosis. Personally I use marijuana to help bi-polor attacks and depression. When I was 10-14 years old I was manic, depressed and suicidal.Never used pot before. Pot helps tremendously to ballance my mind. manic or down
7255202 1 year ago
@zadeh79 I have a theory about STM and attention span of those who are high on marijuana. I believe that STM and attention is not reduced at all. The user simply experiences a different perspective. Instead of dialoque, I remember emotions. The user is also far more introspective and sensitive to emotion. For example of perspective change- sober I like to listen to hardrock. When im stoned I like to listen to piano melodies or "hippie music genre's", or even classical. Puts me in the mood.
7255202 1 year ago
Your videos are excellent!
stevenfarrisohio 2 years ago
They were originally devised as scholastic aptitude tests, to show whether a child should be advanced or held back in his education. This guy is full of hot air.
uberjim83 2 years ago
"'R'-'E'-IN people" lol
keepsitreals 2 years ago
although i do want to point out that i agree with this video completely. i think people get so confused that words arnt real! everyone needs to put words and labels on everything and it causes alot of confusion. words are relative to what each person perceives it as.
Noyru 2 years ago
words are real because the things they describe are real. if someone unintentionally describes something wrongly, it just means that he perceived it wrongly. if someone describes something in part but to the best of his knowledge, it just means that he perceives it in part. it does not mean that language or words are relative and hold no objective meaning. if you mean that language and words hold no objective meaning, then you can only mean that they do or do not subjectively, and not "really".
oneismorethannone 2 years ago
i know you most likely didn't mean that actually or directly, but recently i've become very sensitive to the degradation of language stemming from attitude that words are only relative in meaning. i think that words do mean things; it's just that modern psychology isn't old enough to really know how to label everything in one way. as opposed to looser meanings in terms, i think there needs to be more competition in ideologies and terms than there is presently, which is why i like this series.
oneismorethannone 2 years ago 2
@Noyru Words are like money. Both only exist because we agree that they do. :o)
futbolangel02 1 year ago
okay seriously. i like listening to this guy but looking at him is boring. i have to clean up my room while watching his videos or something...lol. Try doing a slideshow type thing to reiterate what he's saying instead of just showing him there. i think i'd raise the quality of the video by much!
Noyru 2 years ago 3
Also, Planned Parenthood was started by one of the Eugenicist leaders.
audadvnc 2 years ago 2
Correct, yes the Nazis were elitist & racists in the most extreme sense. To them "your being poor or sick is your fault" meaning blame the victim. That is a mentality that is completely void of compassion. Truth is there is no such thing as a smart or dumb human, it's only a matter of time & a matter of the work that individual invests in themselves before their minds are improved, updated, & transformed. Shoot! Albert Einstein himself failed elementary school math.
GalinorGustave 2 years ago
Isn't that like saying "there is no such thing as a slow or fast car, it's only a matter of time and matter of work that individuals invest in souping up their engines?" A smart person has invested work in developing his mind, a stupid person has not (unless he is hindered by a genetic problem).
And no, the Einstein thing was an urban myth. He was actually a prodigy in math from a very young age.
uberjim83 2 years ago
yes that's exactly what I'm saying! And perhaps Einstein is not the best example. But that's not really the point thou lol.
GalinorGustave 2 years ago
Einstein was slow, at understanding 'simple' concepts, but he was accelerated with respect to solving problems of higher relational complexity.
zadeh79 2 years ago
Evidence please? Every source that I've been able to find that actually related to his life said that he never had any kind of a problem with school, learning, or understanding anything.
uberjim83 2 years ago
Just because someone can learn well in school, does not mean that they are not 'slow' at absorbing new concepts (and being 'slow' in that sense, does not necessarily equate to dullness). Although school's overemphasize crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence has shown to be valuable in higher order cognitive skills (like relational reasoning, creativity).
When I say Einstein was 'slow', I mean relative to the products of his thoughts. (but not relative to the average person)
zadeh79 2 years ago
Actually, that's exactly what it means. Learning IS the process of absorbing new concepts.
uberjim83 2 years ago
'Slow' in the elementary processing sense, does not equate to slowness in understanding higher concepts, which require relational depth.
zadeh79 1 year ago
Not necessarily relevant, since he wasn't slow by either of those definitions. However, it is true that those who excel at elementary processing tend to have higher abilities to understanding higher concepts, much the same as how those who can read and write are more likely to understand the plot of a complex novel than those who cannot.
uberjim83 1 year ago
IQ is based off of the assumption of intellectual constancy, and this postulate has been violated by recent laboratory evidence, suggesting that processing skills can be honed. In fact, the general correlation between working memory capacity and IQ is fairly low, and it appears as if WMC relies on a nearly completely independent factor: fluid intelligence.The independence of fluid and crystallized intelligence (IQ) aids in explaining 1) the flynn effect 2) school-IQ discrepencies and 3) autism.
zadeh79 1 year ago
No, the concept of a static IQ is based on it, not the idea of the IQ itself. You may as well try to refute the notion of height by pointing out that your height changes throughout your life.
uberjim83 1 year ago
thats because he had ADHD, I strugle to do basic tasks but I can form incrediobly detailed and complex theories and solutions to proplems, and I dont have a third level qualification - because the education system neglects people like me and stigmatises us with things like ADHD......
MrPiejacker 2 years ago
@uberjim83 Maybe Einstein did fail math because he was more intelligent than his teachers. Maybe he didn't use "their" formulas for coming up with the correct answer so they "graded" him as they saw fit according to their "rules". Just a thought.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
@futbolangel02 There's no "maybe" about it, his academic career was never a secret. He did not fail at math. He excelled in class even from a young age. The stuff about him failing is pure fiction.
uberjim83 1 year ago
@uberjim83 I can believe that. That is why I say "maybe" because I wasn't there and I do not know what really happened. :o) Faith plays a part in my thinking because I have to have faith that I'm not being lied to when I receive information. I've become sadly aware that some people that write history are a group of coordinated people that intentionally distribute lies.
futbolangel02 1 year ago
@futbolangel02 O ok, I gotcha.
uberjim83 1 year ago
@uberjim83 Einstein is widely believed to have suffered from a form of High functioning Autism (Asperger syndrome), where there is an abnormal enhancement of fluid intelligence - the stuff that conventional IQ tests do not measure. In addition, the forensic examination of Einstein's brain has revealed an unusually high ratio of glial cells to neurons, as well as several other anomalies, which all suggest his genius could be attributed to more than simply IQ.
zadeh79 1 year ago
@zadeh79 Not widely believed by people who know what Asperger syndrome is. It's a social/emotional impediment, not a superpower, and people with Asperger syndrome aren't any more prone to high fluid intelligence than anybody else.
uberjim83 1 year ago
@uberjim83 The fact that individuals diagnosed with HFA/Asperger's score significantly higher on tests of fluid intelligence, is practically irrefutable. Just google it, and see for yourself.
zadeh79 1 year ago
@uberjim83 "Superior fluid intelligence in Children with Asperger’s disorder" (Mika Hayashi, et al. Brain and Cognition, Volume 66, issue 3, 2007)
zadeh79 1 year ago
@zadeh79 Thanks man!
uberjim83 1 year ago
How about "emotional intelligence"? This is usually more indicative of whether a person is going to "succeed" or not.
evesrib 2 years ago
not if you are too sensitive
keepsitreals 2 years ago
A high emotional IQ does not mean overly sensitive.
evesrib 2 years ago 2
I have high EQ and IQ.
Sorry, im proud of it lol :')
psychotom0 2 years ago
really?! =0
crazycrave94 2 years ago
It's probably best not to talk about 'emotional intelligence', as it is indirectly important to intellectual functioning.
zadeh79 2 years ago
Soundly discovered truth has revealed the fact that any & all persons who disdainfully deem themselves the discriminating determiners of the appallingly audacious application of uselessly urinated Eugenics, are by virtue of their dastardly determinations, themselves correctly deemed to undoubtedly be afflicted with severe mental defectiveness & deplorably debilitative cognitive dysfunctions. These things derived from the immensity of their selfishness & the corrupted core of their personhood
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I'm subscribing.
zadeh79 2 years ago
They're whacked, due to their self promoting humanism from which they arrive at the regressive demotion to animal, ape status
That mentality reapplied, should cause one to jump over a dollar to get to a dime!
cognitive dysfunction? Ideologically, they assert that "man is inherently good". How then does one explain all of the existent wrongfulness without attributing it to a mental/social construct of man?
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
The intellectual & economic elitist Eugenicists of the late 19th - 20th wrote the literature presented as the basis for Eugenics. Then, one day some amongst them would have given birth to a few, perhaps, reproduction defects, cretinous children
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Time to revise the literature, append an exception clause that explains how occasionally when reproductive conception occurs on the night in which the father had worn a tall, causative top hat. It causes a biological phenomena of cretinous reproduction that historically has been hereditarily preposterously implicit & inimitably, artificially induced
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
Thus, Eugenics is applicatively necessarily inapplicable for that impeccably reputable bloodline of finely bred, prestigiously pedigreed & specially sired specimens from a demonstrably documented & diligently double-bred, dazzling dam
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago
I see how SAT and other various aptitude tests were seen as racist in the past, but how can they still be called racist today when everyone gets the same education now?
whitetyger00 2 years ago
very intreasting...
XXTheRealMcCoyXX 2 years ago
ok hes drawing a HUGE jump of logic when hes saying that our so called biological explanations of today reflect the same premise as the 1920s.
secondly, we take the socio/cultural situation into account in the diagnosis.
restlys 2 years ago
....meh
restlys 2 years ago
You have to remember that anthropology also started out with a philosophy in eugenics. This is why they were so hot on measuring peoples cranial capacity. But from such racist roots, anthropology has contributed to our understanding of how very similar we all are, as well as our differences. It has cataloged the complexity of cultures and the ingenuity of individuals- and instead of proving the inferiority of some- it has celebrated the diversity of all.
Carex09 2 years ago
Maybe someday we might be able to say the same about psychology. But only if they lose their ethnocentrism.
Carex09 2 years ago
Eugenics is a flawed philosophy because there will ALWAYS be someone who is weaker then the rest.
You could have a room filled with 100 super heroes. And one of those superheroes is the weakest of them all.
The strongest man today, could end up being the weakest man tomorrow. It fluctuates.
A person who wants to exterminate another because he deems him weak and useless. Could end up in that same position tomorrow, when his colleagues deem HIM weak and useless.
Why not raise people up?
Vigatos 2 years ago
@Vigatos "Eugenics is a flawed philosophy because there will ALWAYS be someone who is weaker then the rest."
How would that make it flawed?
hitssquad 2 years ago
The reason is because having this idea that you need to exterminate the weak is pointless and doesn't improve the human race. It just destroys it.
One day you could be the nazi commander killing all of the jews and the weak. Tomorrow you could suffer a serious illness and become crippled and handicapped. Then your colleagues will throw you into the ovens, because your useless. It's flawed.
I'm not religious, but we need to raise each other up, not compete to the death.
Vigatos 2 years ago
Agreed. Besides, weak traits will inevitably phase themselves out, since they don't help a person's genes to get passed on. The strong exist to help and protect the weak, not victimize them.
uberjim83 2 years ago 2
Judging based on the fact that both of my comments got a thumbs down, we must have a eugenicist roaming these comments.
The strong could not become strong without others help. The biggest and strongest bodybuilder, would never have achieved that without the help of society. He needed the food, the supplements, the gym, the mentorship, the encouragement, the inspiration, the competition, he needed others.
So for a strong person to think that he can shit on other people, is flawed and stupid.
Vigatos 2 years ago 3
Either that, or someone just disagrees with you. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an eugenecist.
uberjim83 2 years ago 5
It's the murder of 6 Million Jews (according to an estimate given by a Nazi official in the Nuremberg Trials) PLUS Communists, Social Democrats, Liberals, Nazis in the socialist wing of the Nazi party, the SA (one of the two Nazi party armies), resistance fighters, Germans that were denounced by their neighbours to the secret police, homosexuals, Sinti and Roma, disabled people, later on lots of Russian POWs were murdered (that were not of Jewish origin) and other POWs as well, of course.
quotendeutscher 2 years ago
I live in a small Northern English town where many people are white morons, does this mean they should be exterminated.
YES!
LabRat6619 2 years ago
watch the video film 1984 which shows our situation clearly!
Ie., 'big brother' -the elites- will MAKE you see good as bad and bad as good. It will make you agree to poison and kill your own children and call that good!!!
zezt 2 years ago
Your videos are so informative. THANK YOU!
JulieSomeone 2 years ago 7
stop drinking
marksnoise 2 years ago
Great video.
I wish there were more views.
striker1224 2 years ago 2
let question the hole idea of testing and ask who benifits the most from these activities.... what is it function....and do intelligent animals eat other intelligent animals...and what does this prove.....
timelesstruths 2 years ago 2
not to mention hilters ghost army when everything turned queer on them. and people being asphyxiated on vampires
HARTLIKEWHEEL 2 years ago
Using the example of my ball python, the dumb eat the intelligent. Most snakes are almost purely instinctual, not much going on upstairs. Yet they catch and eat rats, which are quite intelligent (or they're supposed to be, they will shit in their drinking water and nest).
jerami101 2 years ago
in the evolution of man in the case iraq and nazi germany i would go dislexic on them. i would turn on them, and bring the whole system full circle. i would do this to survive. not because i am cruel person. its a simple plan of a warbird. i would bring in a leveler and turn them to ruins.
HARTLIKEWHEEL 2 years ago
Guy says, "wish someone would come along and turn me on to a clue bout what's going on here!". Truth is: What if he never shows up? You need a better plan then that!
livingparadoxORG 2 years ago
noooooooo what happened to the nightlight background from your succesful parenting vids? that was awesome
goanyways 2 years ago
Tests are just games. The "scientists" are the game designers. They do research to find the games that single out the population they want "raise up", and conversely, the population they want to "oppress".
Once the identify this game set, the relabel it a "TEST" and the winners of the game as "SUPERIOR".
To help combat those who label their "TESTS" as games, they preemptively declare the skill sets used by the winners of the game as "INNATE" and "UNTEACHABLE".
It's Eugenics, pure an simple.
file83 2 years ago
i am interested in this subject but whatever john breeding is talking about i can not focus on it because i have ADD. please get someone else to rerecord what he said so i can listen to it the hell!
steffankaizer 2 years ago
I think a puzzling intelligence can be generative in terms of further understanding, but a gaming intelligence tends to be object oriented and is bound to degenerate due to the limiting nature of winning. Winning intelligence generally will try to defeat or enslave puzzling intelligence. Winning intelligence is more goal seeking and will murder puzzling intelligence. It's the Caine and Able story. The tree of course held the results of gaming intelligence.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
There are two different directions intelligence can take. Most folks seem to like the competitive or gaming intelligence. This is based in hierarchy and hierarchal ethics. It is the arm waving, shiny object winning intelligence. This also includes religion since the objects of worship are iconic and drawn from hierarchal models. The other is puzzling intelligence that derives satisfaction from truth like models. Gamer intelligence has little sense of shame and has psychopathic attributes.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
I did not know this but when i was a little kid, but i was relatively bright, but was being deluged with dogma, indoctrination, and the associable lies and threats that go along with this. I was 6 yo and i thought the basturds were going to put me to death. Not kidding! These big lies impede a child's intelligence and get them off into who can hurt whom behaviors. Freedom of religion and speech can be very destructive to puzzling intelligence because gaming intelligence impedes creativity.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
SAT intelligence... lol. Psychology says that this test is not really a good indicator of intelligence, if you can prep for a test your not going on intelligence but by memory.
oddsource 2 years ago 3
Spot on.
IAteBrownies 2 years ago
I've heard Obama supports/believes in Eugenics. I didn't vote for him or McSame and definitely didn't support Clinton either. I knew they were all on the same team(all CFR members). I "voted" for Ron Paul, despite my awareness that he might be controlled opposition.
Crzykjn 2 years ago 3
w0000t w0000t ron pauls the man :D
yourboycal 2 years ago
I agree. I love Ron Paul.
However, I do believe in genetic differences between the races. Though the media would like to have you believe otherwise. These tests that are "culturally biased" against blacks, still allow Asians to consistently score higher than even whites.
This is a lame excuse.
SpeedingStudent 2 years ago 2
...If you are truely INTELLIGENT
you let not TEST yourself
and do NOT TEST others
jackp6 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheColaGoodfellow 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheColaGoodfellow 2 years ago
Informative. I liked it alot thanks :)
TheOriain99 2 years ago
whatever happened to the original psychtruth girl?
ddamico3 2 years ago
The funny part of it all is the average republican retard is big on Eugenics.
The dumber they are, the more they believe in this garbage
qwertywxyz 2 years ago
Virtually all the people involved in eugenics, from Margaret Sanger in the U.S. to John Maynard Keynes in England were liberals.
EricShermansChannel 2 years ago
I'd prefer to call them socialists, as there is a serious misconception of what the term "liberal" means today. It's not really opposite to "conservative" because real conservatives are quite liberal in terms of free market and economy. A lot of "intelligentsia" of that time were dumb enough to be fascinated by Marx's ideas before the results of such madness were obvious.
AmerginMacEccit 2 years ago
"Classical" liberals are in fact closer to "Conservatives", as far as their views on personal liberties and freedoms. I agree with your point entirely. Nowadays our views are skewed by a few issues that supposedly dictate our classification as Democrat/Neo-con, when the reality is only a few hardliners fall on party lines within all issues. Thank you for being a voice of intelligence on youtube, there aren't to many on here. That comment was a response to QUERTYWXYZ's comment about Republicans.
EricShermansChannel 2 years ago 2
Have to say I think the whole way we a taught in schools isn't right somehow, yes it's important to be able to communicate ..Maths/ English and learn some of the other things that schools teach.
It's my opinion not enough emphasis is put on other important areas of life, it all seems economy based, not, ...people based, you know ?
djmisplacedmarblesTV 2 years ago 4
too stupid to eat
wch7 2 years ago 2
Eugenics using intelligence will not have a drastic effect on the size of the prison population. After all, the criminals who escape detection or justice ARE the ones intelligent enough to do so.
metrx330 2 years ago
Well i know the IQ test isn't very good, i've taken it three times for my IEP, once for middle school, and the other two in high school. First one was about 120, second 116, and the last one was 133. Three different results for the IQ test kind of show's it's not a good way to measure someones mentality.
Just seems like a test made for puting people in their spots. Imagen if it didn't exist, and instead of calling me retarded, and putting me in a special class they could just help out more.
jrdudedj 2 years ago 3
It's fairly normal to fluctuate within a standard deviation. Some tests are also different. I had a 139 on the Stanford-Binet he's talking about, and then I had a 119, 121, and 123 as my GT scores on the military ASVAB test. Your scores will vary slightly depending on how much sleep you got or if you're stressed out at the time,l but that's not going to drop someone from 120 to 80.
EricShermansChannel 2 years ago
The human mind and body are way too complex to create any sort of test to see if someone is smarter than the other. People are smart in different areas from one another. For instance one person may be a math genius but totally weak physically, whereas another is horrible at math but has amazing physical ability. I don't believe any of these tests show or prove anything as we as people are just too complex for such a thing. I believe we all have the same potential, only use it in different ways.
KevinCali24 2 years ago
Another example, society would leave you to believe criminals are all stupid, but in reality many of them get away with crime using their smarts. They devote their mind power to devious tasks whereas you and I use that mind power for more normal things. Me personally, I believe in balance and try to devote a little bit of my mind power to everything in life that I can. This makes me a jack of all trades, but a master at none of them. Maybe by the time I'm 100, I will have mastered them all. ;-)
KevinCali24 2 years ago
You'd be even more disturbed by this video, if you knew what a zombie anti-psychotics make people. side effects can't think, can't get out of bed or out of chair, depression. the client can't think well enough to take a step to stop the meds. other people have no idea how devastated the patient is. & they easily blame all the bad things on the "mental illness".
iMute0 2 years ago
I hear that
djmisplacedmarblesTV 2 years ago
Comment removed
iMute0 2 years ago
The problem with eugenics is in breeding for IQ, you are limiting the gene pool.
Ashkanazi Jews have the highest IQs in the world, largely due to a patrimonial culture that, inadvertantly, selectively bred for IQ.
They also have huge rates of Cancer and other genetic disorders.
Lifetime breat cancer incidence: (Non-ashkanazi woman): ~8%
Lifetime breat cancer incidence: (Ashkanazi woman): ~44%
edydon 2 years ago
5 stars~~~~~
studentoflife01 2 years ago