There should be a federal right to work law. Unions call it union busting, but if right to work laws bust unions, the only people at fault are the unions. If a union benefits workers, then when a right to work law is passed, workers will remain part of the union. If the union doesn't work for them, they are free to leave the union, which is generally the case. I am all in favor of right to work legislation, and unfortunately I am currently stuck in Colorado, another forced unionism state.
Obama Thanks His Friends: Government Spending and Union Support
Since 1990, labor unions have contributed over $667 million in election campaigns in the United States, of which $614 million or 92 percent went to support Democratic candidates. In 2008, unions spent $74.5 million in campaign contributions, with $68.3 million going to the Democratic Party. Already,..
So glad to see this. I know many teachers who feel the same way. Right to work is such a noble venture. No one should have to join and pay for something they would rather do on their own in fear of how they will be treated or that they can't join committees to help the children because of lack of special treatment ect.
Let's keep the debate intellectually honest. What business does the federal government have passing the Taft-Hartley Act (which Ronald Reagan called "vicious" in 1948) which dictates what a collective bargaining unit may contract with an employer? Youtube search "Ronald Reagan Truman 1948." This is not conservative. It is government interference in the free market. It is intellectual dishonesty at its worse.
Good grief. The usual arguments. It is the union that supports the rule that it is to be the only negotiator in a contract. The non-union members would gladly negotiate their own contracts, but it is the union, not the non-union members, standing in the way. Eliminate that rule and you'll have your wish. Then the freedom to choose will come with the responsibility to negotiate your own terms.
Good for Freedom to Work for standing up to the unions that destroyed Flint and Detroit. It is not "freeloading" to not pay for something you don't want! Those who are forced to pay dues against their will are CAPTIVE PASSENGERS--not would-be freeloaders.
Terry Bowman has been duped by the anti-worker law firm. Make no mistake: This is no "grassroots" movement; big money is behind the curtin.
solidarity4 5 months ago
There should be a federal right to work law. Unions call it union busting, but if right to work laws bust unions, the only people at fault are the unions. If a union benefits workers, then when a right to work law is passed, workers will remain part of the union. If the union doesn't work for them, they are free to leave the union, which is generally the case. I am all in favor of right to work legislation, and unfortunately I am currently stuck in Colorado, another forced unionism state.
v12tommy 6 months ago
right to work states have lower wages. I dont want to work for peanuts.
KripDrip 1 month ago
@KripDrip
then get a better education you looter
huntforsport 3 weeks ago
BULLSHIT SPEWED OUT BY UNIONS? WHAT A CONCEPT!
THAT'S LIKE SAYING YOU'RE FOR WORKERS COMMITTING SUICIDE AND DEMANDING YOUR RIGHT TO KILL YOURSELF!
cherahh116 7 months ago
Geeze, another Koch Brothers funded bullshit front, what a surprise.
robertmike57 7 months ago
Obama Thanks His Friends: Government Spending and Union Support
Since 1990, labor unions have contributed over $667 million in election campaigns in the United States, of which $614 million or 92 percent went to support Democratic candidates. In 2008, unions spent $74.5 million in campaign contributions, with $68.3 million going to the Democratic Party. Already,..
kbjordan08 8 months ago
So glad to see this. I know many teachers who feel the same way. Right to work is such a noble venture. No one should have to join and pay for something they would rather do on their own in fear of how they will be treated or that they can't join committees to help the children because of lack of special treatment ect.
DaydreaminAngels 8 months ago
Let's keep the debate intellectually honest. What business does the federal government have passing the Taft-Hartley Act (which Ronald Reagan called "vicious" in 1948) which dictates what a collective bargaining unit may contract with an employer? Youtube search "Ronald Reagan Truman 1948." This is not conservative. It is government interference in the free market. It is intellectual dishonesty at its worse.
FCusumano1 8 months ago
Good grief. The usual arguments. It is the union that supports the rule that it is to be the only negotiator in a contract. The non-union members would gladly negotiate their own contracts, but it is the union, not the non-union members, standing in the way. Eliminate that rule and you'll have your wish. Then the freedom to choose will come with the responsibility to negotiate your own terms.
HensleyRon 8 months ago
Good for Freedom to Work for standing up to the unions that destroyed Flint and Detroit. It is not "freeloading" to not pay for something you don't want! Those who are forced to pay dues against their will are CAPTIVE PASSENGERS--not would-be freeloaders.
toolgirl42 8 months ago 2
Freedom to receive all the benefits without any of the effort. How American.
FlintPublic 8 months ago
Surprise, surprise, the anti-union Koch-financed Mackinac Center is trying to kill unions. What else is new?
kjbas1958 8 months ago
This is what liberty is about! Choosing.
eline65 8 months ago