Added: 3 years ago
From: gretavo
Views: 21,214
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheHungrySnail I can't prove anything, as you know, and neither did NIST. I think they blew them up, you don't. It won't change bugger all either way!

  • @TheHungrySnail So you counted three. That gives you at least three to explain then, doesn't it? If you can, THEN i'll shut the fuck up!

  • Ummmm ......bullshit

  • just ignore rangerbelt. he's one of those paranoid, delusional, self projecting coincidence theorists

  • Some of you nitwit conspiracy theory people otta take a fire extinguisher and go out in the woods and make a ncie big bonfire and then place the extinguisher on the fire. Wait around and see what happens. No i know in a building with 100 stories there were no fire extinguishers present to support my theory that every once in awhile an extinguisher exploded. just a thought.

  • @Rangerbelt

    You ought to tell us why you tend to believe the official "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" fairy tale which have never been proven, is false in many ways and don't fit scientific scrutiny.

  • @Rangerbelt Why would fire extinguishers explode dozens of floors below the fire? And i have yet to hear of a single fire extinguisher spontaneously combusting, let alone multiple ones!

  • look like camera flashes to me

  • Heres the video of the whole building being blown to smithereens...

    watch?v=OfVMOIUBnso

    If Its obvious, give us a thumbs up

  • PAPER!

  • It's fucking debris falling from the building you imbred dumbfucks.

  • This video is bullshit

  • the 9 year anniversary

  • this video is obviously edited. First off, who videos the world trade centre at this time in the morning.

    secondly why is the footage so out of focus?

  • Government knew about Corrosion inside T_win T_owers and had to Fast-Track their

    de-commissioning by 2007. NYC council forbid C_ontrolled D_emolition and the people who tendered the

    corrosion and de-commissioning research have destroyed all their files and had people sign

    forms saying they will never talk about this as per Thomas-Scott Gordon 1989

    Search Thomas Gordon and corrosion of the T_win T_owers

    vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om and search Thomas Scott Gordon

  • That first flash is great footage and very convincing, if in fact the video is legite. I questioned the validity of the video when i saw the time of 7:43 which isn't valid at all. Unless their refering to 7:43 as a point of time in a video they got it from.

  • where the hell are the pops

  • @BSbrian

    NO planes were used, watch

    911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS

  • Probably just light-reflection. God, you people! Can't you just accept the reality that there is no government conspiracy?

  • Cant you just accept the reality that there is no group living in caves conspiring to attack the US?

  • 0:19 ,see ,2 broken widows by persons or fire ,fire posible (in this floor ,cause by "the fire ball" ,this fire ball , caused many fires in lower floors of impact, even on the 3rd floor and the lobby),

    and the other two flashes are metal debris falling from the building....

  • Why didn't the firemen report anything from inside there?

  • @Weirdo10o4 they did.

  • Yes they reported some explosions around in there, nothing unusual about them, but the building was full of firefighters at the time of the collapse, anything that can destroy a column is going to completely destroy other things around it since the columns were the strongest things in the whole construction. Where are the firemen from above 40 floors talking about anything else than fire?

  • 10-4 check these out..

    watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

    and

    watch?v=edO4r9ZIufc

    "add" those lines to the youtube url

  • AS IN THE FIREFIGTHERS INSIDE THE BUILDINGS WHO DIED IN THE COLLAPSE, gee.... they should've reported something if there were bombs going off in there, NOTHING BUT FIRE, may I remind you that the 1993 car bombing didn't sever a single core column.

  • ah I see what your saying now.. I'll look around for something that fits (if any)

  • ubertuberx5,False!!!!!!!!!

  • in other case ,the smoke from the flashes are ,is smoke coming out of the debris as it falls, remember that burning debris went!

  • please don't think that its glass the explosions don't look that big but the buildings are huge they are classic demolition charges the first one is in the skylobby which helps reinforce the building & if ur going to take it all the way down u have to take that out not to mention the fireproofing was all asbestos which had to cleaned up and would cost billions so u fake the attack & it gives them an excuse for war so they can raid the piggy bank and dole out all of our money to their friends

  • thats glass

  • why do i hear police and firetrucks

  • Yes ,7:43 am?? 7.52am??? ,before the impact? , are you fucking kidding? ,People do not be fooled,se the impact in the video ,at the top of the building in this video ,and watch the smoke too......People, do not be fooled by this garbage more videos of conspiracy, there no conspiracy, all of the conspiracy of 9 / 11 is false and makes a mockery of those who died that tragic day, remember them not make fun of them.

  • and listen to abmulance, and fire trucks !!!

  • holy crap

  • Pretty damn incriminating.

  • Ah, so they refer to the times in the other video. Well that makes some sense then.

  • they were filming BEFORE the planes hit? (since your video says the flashes happened about an hour and a half before the planes hit) then wouldnt that be, in truther logic, proof they knew it was gonna happen? So they would then, by truther logic, be "in on it", yet cause they have flashes they are showing in this video, we should ignore that inconsistancy and believe them?

  • The times in my video refer to the position in Bob and Bri's video, not to the time of day. And to an earlier commenter, there is no sound at all in my video, Bob and Bri's, the original, has sound. They were filming from pretty far away and the explosive flash you see is probably a reflection from a flash deep in the core of the building, so it's not surprising you don't hear the pop on their video. Dozens of people inside the towers reported hearing explosions.

  • @gretavo Don't you think there would need to be hundreds of explosions? I mean look at a demolition of a building many times smaller and look at those explosions, there are tons. But from all these videos there aren't anywhere near as many as there should be to take down such a building. Just a thought. /watch?v=GtIjUn7_erY&feature=r­elated

  • @TheStarvingSamurai Most of them were in the inside on the collums, taking out the core collums that hold 70% of teh structure makes the whole thing go down when weight is pushed on it

  • @lukealandrummond But wouldn't you hear them? In all of the videos you here like 5 but to demolish such big buildings you would need thousands right?

  • @TheStarvingSamurai Well the tower is extremely high and they didn't go off all at the same time....Some went off earlier and people were reporting explosions inside the towers and infact some people saw ....Then as the tower started to go, the sound of the tower would just mix in with the explosions and no one would notice or even be able to distinguish them

  • @lukealandrummond Have you seen a large building get demolished? Do you know how loud it is and how easy it is to hear the explosions?

  • @TheStarvingSamurai Yes i have and it depends on what explosives you use, but this demolishing was different.The top went and as it started coming down they started setting off explosives floor by floor...that way you have little sound as possible and it's covered or atleast sounds covered by the tower collapsing

  • @lukealandrummond Have you tested with a scale model? When has a building of this size been demolished? How do you know that you won't hear it? You need evidence not -just trust me, you wouldn't hear the thousands of explosives needed to bring down 110 story buildings-.

  • @TheStarvingSamurai that then brings to the tower collapse and how not one computer model has ever been able to make the tower fully collapse, not one....

  • @lukealandrummond What's the computer model have too do with anything? I'm just asking how they demolished the building without anyone noticing the large amount of explosives needed to do so. Sure there are a few loud noises but engineers who have trained for many years have already gave possible causes yet you people disregard them because you seem to think you know better.

  • @TheStarvingSamurai The pancake theory? That was disproven with core collums...Haven't heard another....and weeks leading up to 9 11, there were problems with security and people were going in the towers...People even reported seeing weird cube shaped things...There were power cuts and everything....The had plenty of time

  • @TheStarvingSamurai It's a simulation that shows that the towers should not have fallen in on themselves. And people did.Some people reported seeing the workers coming in with Plans and Weird squares. And Possible causes aren't enough. Well known engineers and physicists have gone against the official story. You can work the physics out for yourself.

    1. That plane should not have simply sliced through the building, have you seen the damaged by a bird

    2. The whole tower shouldn't have collapsed

  • @lukealandrummond What do you expect an accelerating plane of that size to do to a building? And the person who actually designed the buildings even has said that they weren't built to withstand such a large aircraft going into the building full throttle.

  • @TheStarvingSamurai Really? Proof?? The vids ive seen of the people that built it said it could widthstand multiple (yes multiple!) 707 planes hitting each and they wouldnt fall. They WERE designed for planes to hit them. Also look into previous fires that occurred at the WTC. While your at it look up steel frame buildings with fire and see how many collapsed.

  • @bjm351 skepdic(DOT)com/911conspiracy.­html

  • @JediBillman If you can't even figure out what timecode is, and what this video is referring to, then how can you hope to have a rational discussion about explosives? I mean, I could try to have a discussion with you, but your incompetence would be tough to overcome. That's my "truther logic".

  • You know when the building starts falling down? Thats not caused by detonations. You can clearly see the whole part of the building above the impact zone falls first because of the BIG hole the Boing made.

  • Has anyone ever tried to Contact and question BOB and BRI about this very suspicious strange video ?

    IF a 2nd plane hit the Tower, it was clearly edited out of the video, do we know who did this and why ?

    also why was the video NOT released until 5 yrs after 911 ? Do we know if the Govt posessed this tape before 06 ?

  • Why no sound? Those charges make thunder-like booms.

  • I found you again, wussy! Quit running and take your verbal beating like a man. I would comment about you again, but I'm tired of making you look bad..still LMAO@u!!

  • wow. now that was proof enough for ME! fucking idiots.

  • the plane crashed into the towers at 8:46 wetient the buliding have collapsed by then?

  • omg only 427 views out of 6billion DAMM!!!

  • Now its up to 1,629.

  • The flashes at 07:52 are very brief so they don't always show up. There are two of them, and if you replay the video a few times you should see them.

  • Actually, to make sure you see them, at 0:21 and 0:22 of this vid, shrink the video by clicking the button to the left of the "full screen" button. The smaller size is less lossy over the net... or you can download it...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more