So at the end she's listening to see what the cop is saying. And she thinks the he believes her story by "sending people over to see if the house was burglarized" then she starts in again with the acting. This bitch is TERRifying...
I love the way she's just sitting there, still thinking that Mike is dead, and she's chatting about his lyposuction, as if she's discussing the weather. She is what a friend of mine calls a DC. The "D" stands for "dumb," so you figure it out, LMAO!
What a stupid bitch! She saw nothing wrong with what the officers are asking her to do. Why would they meranda warn her and have her sign it unless she was a suspect? And have her sign about being video taped on top of it! Very dumb
What a stupid bitch! She saw nothing wrong with what the officers are asking her to do. Why would they meranda warn her and have her sign it unless she was a suspect? And have her sign about being video taped on top of it! Very dumb
@Skiadventure007 The worst part is there are so many people that do this sort of thing daily. She is definitely a sociopath and belongs with the other psychos (I.E. Susan Smith, Cayce Anthony, etc.)
Why is it the finest women cant own up to SH!T??? I caught one doing something RED HANDED... and later asked her about it... and still to this day she cant own up to it. I was really good friends with her family before I met her and all of the hate me becasue she refuses to own up to it.... even though I heard her talking on the phone spilling the beans on everything?!?!?!?!?!?!
Sad!! She is very pretty, this man probably loved her genuinely and would've given her anything she asked for, but she was greedy, she wanted IT ALL and she wanted instant gratification. It's women like this that cause men to turn against love and never trust women. To think, he left his wife for this piece of trash. The judge shld've gvn her the full 30 yrs!!!
HAHAHAHAHA!! I love it she starts to fake cry after they leave the room. Then she hears them talking and immediately stops. Then just as they're fixing to walk right back in she start again!!!! LOL
Take notes guys--the set-up, the motive, the fake tears at her husband's "death," the little miss innocent act and denial even when caught red-handed--this is the average woman's moral compass.
@misOBGYNist If you are trying to suggest there is no difference between psychopathy and being a female, then by your logic male psychopaths and hermaphrodites. The difference is psychopathy is a disorder, and female is a sex.
@proofandevidence "...then by your logic male psychopaths and hermaphrodites." Finish your sentence moron. While you're working on your fragment, you forgot about fags such as yourself. ; )
@misOBGYNist That is actually an error, that was meant to be an are instead of an and, now replace those words, and let them guide you to the ignorance of the comment in question. Also, call me a fag to my face, and I will have it carved into yours.
@proofandevidence I'm aware of the ignorance of your comment thanks. Threatening to carve people's faces? Ooooh what anger and violence! I must have struck a nerve. Thanks for confirming what a moron you are by making such an idiotic statement that is tantamount to jealous drunk Mexican saying "I'll cut you man! " Lulz.
I think the real error here, is when your mom sat on that cum stained mattress bare assed in that motel after her last trick. Because that was the day you were conceived. XD
@misOBGYNist Again throwing insults from your computer chair, so again I dare you to say that to my face. But you're a pussy. And AGAIN you avoid the actual debate, on your comment, YOU said "what's the difference?" between women, and psychopathy! You moron, admit that this is one of the dumbest things you have ever said, because dude, that is fucking stupid. Can you or can you not tell the difference between a sex and a psychological disorder? If not, then you have a psychological disorder?
@proofandevidence HINT: There is no actual debate moron. LOL @ the geek loser retard who still can't tell the difference between a sarcastic remark and a literal one. Ooooh and you really stepped it up there after that "I'll cut your face routine" with such a manly dare lmfao " I dare ya, I dare ya!" LOLZ
Pussy? I bet you couldn't tell the difference between a pussy and a hamburger--because you've never seen a pussy in your life, except for your mom's cat. XD
@misOBGYNist Dude you made a stupid comment, a really stupid one. Thank you for admitting it, and I've never seen a pussy? then what was I sticking my dick into her inner thigh? And I never said "I dare ya" I said I dare you, get it straight bitch. Stop making stupid comments you dirtbag, because one day somebody like me is going to punch you in the brain stem. And stop saying LULZ XD LOLZ, unless you think that makes you look cool, and in that case, your not. Eat shit dick licker.
@proofandevidence Now you're just desperately reaching. You were an idiot to take my comment literally and you know it. You failed to note obvious sarcasm. More cyber threats and elementary school insults. Your anger and rage seems to be growing. A sure sign that you're butthurt and owned. Must be pretty frustrating. ; )
@misOBGYNist I knew it was sarcams from the second I read it, I found it insulting to women, so I called you out for your stupid comment. You couldn't take it and cast the first insult, so who was "but hurt"? Thank you for not saying LOLZ or LULZ or XD, you came off alot less nerdy and I don't find anything frustrating, but I am wondering why it is that you would do the wink sign " ;) " to a grown man in more then one comment.
@proofandevidence Now you're totally contradicting yourself! And after walls of text insisting otherwise. Wow, you just keep digging yourself deeper and deeper. XD
@proofandevidence Oh and you don't find anything frustrating? yeahhh right--that's why you're so butthurt and crying with each post with pure nerd rage! XD
Don't worry, I'll call the wahhhmbulance for you, as you enjoy your french cries, with a tall glass of haterade. XD
@misOBGYNist So please, if you make another comment towards me, no LULZ or LOLZ or XDs or wink faces ;) unless you are consciously trying to come across as a flamboyant homosexual.
@proofandevidence Only in your fag mind would you think such common 'emoticons' are homosexual. The taunts are obvious, (or should be--or would be if you weren't such a retard) as is your gay tendency to homosexuality the most trivial matter. XD LOLZ, LULZ!!!! ; )
@misOBGYNist Wow how many comments did you just leave? Let us remember who made the first insult, you did, go read it, so that shows us who is "but hurt". And now you are guilty of saying, "LOLZ, LULZ, XD, wahhhmbulanc, french cries, and haterade." What grade are you in?
@misOBGYNist And you made the first comment, I pointed out she was a psychopath, I did not think it was not sarcasim until you said, "whats the difference?" I was not even commenting on your first comments point, I was saying she was a psychopath, saying whats the difference does not come across as sarcasm, I can't hear the tone of you voice in print. And YOU insulted me first, now your just acting like an immature little bitch. seriously wahhhmulance? You infant.
@proofandevidence "I dare ya, I dare ya!" Again? Finished cyber beating me up and cyber cutting my face yet?XD
AGAIN there is no debate. AGAIN you insist on taking an obviously sarcastic comment literally because you're too stupid to get it. AGAIN you are so butthurt that you are reaching, pleading, and begging in the hopes that I won't notice what you're trying to do. FAIL.
@pitolove71 Sorry to burst your bubble, but bitches don't do a number me, because I never give them a chance to. I got 99 problems but a bitch ain't one. ; )
@misOBGYNist Ha ha, fer sure! BUT there will come a time when you get older, like me, & you'll HAVE to settle down. That's when you're gonna have to find that special someone you can trust. Trust to sleep next to you, trust in your home, trust with your bank account. Unless you're gonna be single all your life...Just a thought. You'll find that hot chic that will be like your best friend! I wasn't looking & I did & life is good...Good luck.
@pitolove71 Oh you're talking about a real woman--a good woman--very, very rare. If you found one congrats--otherwise, you're a fool. Speaking of which..."Trust with your bank account?" You sure sound like a fool. Good luck with that.
@misOBGYNist When a man looking for sex he is a perv but when a woman looking for sex its ok.....women are allow and get away with many things. Whats the different between a hooker and a wife?......the wife is cheaper.
@REDTEAM22003 Correction--a whore is cheaper. A wife will take more than half your shit in divorce, the kids, hit you up for child support & alimony. You pay a whore, fuck her & she's gone. You fuck your wife, you have to support her, listen to her talk shit, put up with her, etc. A whore is way cheaper. ; )
@REDTEAM22003 Lol, we need Lykis back. Or someone to take his place to tell it like it is. Women are getting mad bc they see more & more men are waking up.
@Dicklle34 I read your comment and I'm not sure why you deleted it, except that it was stupid to question if it was real given the press. Feel stupid? : )
@corcovadoquelindo I stand corrected. I sometimes forget to use the appropriate word--BITCH, to describe the female. I apologize to real women everywhere.
@nathanjamesbaker She's arrested here. In the beginning of the video the officer is confirming she understands her rights. You are only read rights when you are under arrest. She had never been in trouble before, so not surprising she missed it.
@talaxian1 You can be read your rights without being arrested, for instance if you are a material witness or even a potential witness. The Miranda warning protects you from self-incrimination, which could occur before being arrested. Please watch Part 2 and you'll see her being arrested.
Anyway, I agree with you she's not very smart. What is not shown on camera is before part 1 when they tricked her into signing a form allowing all the video of her to be used on COPS.
@nathanjamesbaker I have seen all videos. I have never heard of a witness being mirandized. How does that even work, you're a witness but you're allowed to remain silent? As far as I know, she is being arrested here. Essentially you're saying anytime a cop talks to someone they have to mirandize them first in case they incriminate themselves? You can be detained, handcuffed (for police safety), questioned and never be read any rights at all. So I'm not sure why she wouldn't be under arrest here.
@talaxian1 Did you see in part 2 where the interrogating cop tells her "you're under arrest for solicitation to commit murder?" That's when she was arrested. Before that she was being questioned. The key time the Miranda rights have to be read is before the person (especially a suspect or a material witness) is being questioned, even if they are not at that time being arrested.
I do agree with your basic point that she should have realized what was going on when she was read the rights.
@talaxian1 p.s. The other main factor that triggers the Miranda warning is when the person is in custody. So there are two factors: (1) being in custody and (2) before being questioned. This may or may not involve being arrested.
@nathanjamesbaker Incorrect, she was under arrest the moment she was placed in cop car outside her home during the sting operation. An arrest need not be communicated to a suspect in order to occur. The police intended confinement, to charge her and she certainly was not "free to go". Her knowledge is actually irrelevant. You do not have to mirandize a suspect when they are arrested. You only need mirandize them before questioning. Telling her that "she was under arrest" in part two
@bjvivs There are two factors that trigger the Miranda warning, and both have to be present: (1) being in custody and (2) being interrogated. As to the first factor, the suspect's knowledge is absolutely relevant. The cops can tell her she is under arrest and that would qualify as being in custody, but there are other ways of being in custody without hearing the words "you're under arrest," and the test is what a reasonable person in the suspect's position would believe.
A person is being subjected to a custodial interrogation if "a reasonable person would have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave." Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 112 (1995). The ultimate inquiry is whether a normal, reasonable person would feel free to end the encounter with law enforcement and leave the scene. Source: Wikipedia entry on Custodial interrogation.
@bjvivs We can debate whether Dippolito knew (or should have known) she was in custody before she was told she was under arrest. But her understanding of whether she was in custody is absolutely relevant. And in this Part 1 video, she probably thought she was answering questions about her husband, not being placed under arrest. The cops played it safe and read her the rights at the outset. Otherwise, her attorneys might argue she knew she was in custody but was not Mirandized.
@nathanjamesbaker I take issue with defining "under arrest" based on the knowledge of the suspect and the reasonableness test. The police could technically do everything they could to hide the fact that someone is under arrest and this would allow them to interrogate a suspect in custody without mirandizing them. (because condition 1 is not satisfied, because a reasonable person would not have believed that they were under arrest and therefore they were not under arrest). This is why I feel...
@nathanjamesbaker ... that the correct interpretation SHOULD be that time of arrest is determined by custody, communicated or not and the intention to detain by the police and knowledge, actual or implied, by detainee is irrelevant. That's the law in my jurisdiction and If I had to argue in court that Mrs Dipliotto was under arrest the moment she was in the back seat of the cruiser, I would win. I guess not in the US! Regardless, I feel in this particular investigation the police....
@nathanjamesbaker ... certainly acted fairly giving her every opportunity to come clean (or abandon the crime) before they presented her with their evidence.
... was simply their way of breaking the news to her. They were questioning her as a courtesy, to give her the opportunity to admit what she done before they told her the gig is up. Something I think is fair under these circumstances because criminals in "normal" situations always have the opportunity to fess up before the police have finished gathering evidence and that always helps during sentencing.
@talaxian1 I just realized that this video actually does show when they tricked her into signing a consent form to be videotaped for the COPS episode. It's at 1:50 in this video.
I wonder what the hell Michael Dippolito saw in that bitch. She's as ugly as she is stupid as she is downright evil! Good thing she'll be old and saggy when she's out of jail. She'll be cleaned out of the gene pool for good.
So at the end she's listening to see what the cop is saying. And she thinks the he believes her story by "sending people over to see if the house was burglarized" then she starts in again with the acting. This bitch is TERRifying...
MichRockHop81108 3 weeks ago
Loved the fake crying at the end..
laney50w 3 weeks ago
ah fuck it, id fuck her
PitBullRa19h666 3 weeks ago
I love the way she's just sitting there, still thinking that Mike is dead, and she's chatting about his lyposuction, as if she's discussing the weather. She is what a friend of mine calls a DC. The "D" stands for "dumb," so you figure it out, LMAO!
edwardjames50 1 month ago 3
this is to show you that woman ,,All woman can not be trusted
CFuturez 1 month ago
Sorry Miranda is the correct spelling.
In any event, they wouldn't do that to someone they just wanted to question.
gamerdamemcfly 1 month ago
What a stupid bitch! She saw nothing wrong with what the officers are asking her to do. Why would they meranda warn her and have her sign it unless she was a suspect? And have her sign about being video taped on top of it! Very dumb
gamerdamemcfly 1 month ago
What a stupid bitch! She saw nothing wrong with what the officers are asking her to do. Why would they meranda warn her and have her sign it unless she was a suspect? And have her sign about being video taped on top of it! Very dumb
gamerdamemcfly 1 month ago
SHES INNOCENT OKAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH RITE
TOEKNEE5285101 1 month ago
She's so stupid i don't wish jail on anyone but she did this to herself.
Blackseed1978 1 month ago
She tried to poison her husband, get him arrested, and kill. During that time, she was cheating with two other guys. Never date an escort.
SickK8GSXR600 1 month ago
I am watching he court case in true tv right now.
SickK8GSXR600 1 month ago 2
Wow you've not married the guy for a year and you want to kill him?!! God will surely punish her!!!
afiste 1 month ago
@afiste god will forgive her if she asks for it
rjp9871 1 month ago
@rjp9871 Yes he would, you know he loves us so much!! She is a very sad person and i hope she has turn to God!!!
afiste 1 month ago
This girl is ONE of a kind......I'm literally at a lost for words.
Cuchino51 1 month ago
She should burn in hell!!! Messed up man.
kofik01 1 month ago
Lmao that's what's she gets
Ckret1000 1 month ago
her bullshitting is flawless. is she black or latin?
UnaFatsaUnaRasta22 1 month ago
@UnaFatsaUnaRasta22 She said her mom is from Peru and her dad is from Egypt. I think she looks middle-eastern, but I guess she's a mix.
clash4421 1 month ago
ARE YOU SERIOUS???? SUBTITLES PLEASE!!!!!!
adamk4747 2 months ago
...And the Oscar goes to ...
mikelh 2 months ago
"whats that?"
"thats your home number."
"Oh"
cassicakes01 2 months ago 10
@cassicakes01 2:12 Haha!
nathanjamesbaker 2 months ago
lmaaaaooo bitch git trolled hard! !!!
Zmgo 2 months ago
Dalia will you Marry me?
dimpsey3 2 months ago
Aww the tears.isnt she cute
dimpsey3 2 months ago
@REDTEAM22003 bullshit! Judge people one case at a time.
itsjustnopinionok 4 months ago
@itsjustnopinionok uh...wtf are you talking about, im not judging people, i said "ALL WOMEN" which means they are made from birth to bull shit guys.
REDTEAM22003 1 month ago
@Skiadventure007 The worst part is there are so many people that do this sort of thing daily. She is definitely a sociopath and belongs with the other psychos (I.E. Susan Smith, Cayce Anthony, etc.)
MRStmmoore 4 months ago
Why is it the finest women cant own up to SH!T??? I caught one doing something RED HANDED... and later asked her about it... and still to this day she cant own up to it. I was really good friends with her family before I met her and all of the hate me becasue she refuses to own up to it.... even though I heard her talking on the phone spilling the beans on everything?!?!?!?!?!?!
HopllyteAlpha 4 months ago
Not worth your life to bang that broad lol
lever20065 4 months ago
Sad!! She is very pretty, this man probably loved her genuinely and would've given her anything she asked for, but she was greedy, she wanted IT ALL and she wanted instant gratification. It's women like this that cause men to turn against love and never trust women. To think, he left his wife for this piece of trash. The judge shld've gvn her the full 30 yrs!!!
forlawson1 4 months ago
THE ONLY THING GOOD ABOUT HER STYLE OF ACTING, WAS THE FACT THAT NO-ONE EVER KNEW SHE WAS INSANE..
HER 'ACTING' SKILLS CAME IN LONGGGG BEFORE THIS VIDEO.
ACTING '''NORMAL''' SHOULD BE WHAT GETS HER AN AWARD, CAUSE SHE OBVIOUSLY IS A GREAT ACTRESS COVERING UP 'PSYCHOTICNESS'..
LOL.
WOW
MsTee7475 4 months ago
She sure is doing a LOT of TALK when this was 'supposedly' suppose to be a 'reality show' stunt.
lol
This girl is WHACKED and DANGEROUS.
MsTee7475 4 months ago
She says, "I just wanna see my husband."
He says, "No you dont, trust me you dont wanna see him"
....
wow, this is insane.
=-}
MsTee7475 4 months ago
DALIA MOHAMMED is her real name. her mother- RANDA MOHAMMAD
vbosco 4 months ago
HAHAHAHAHA!! I love it she starts to fake cry after they leave the room. Then she hears them talking and immediately stops. Then just as they're fixing to walk right back in she start again!!!! LOL
MRStmmoore 4 months ago 3
@MRStmmoore Good catch. You can see her listening to them intently when they talk about the alarm system at 12:22.
nathanjamesbaker 4 months ago 2
@nathanjamesbaker Yeah I noticed that! Now that's some funny stuff... Psycho chick!
MRStmmoore 4 months ago
@MRStmmoore she was probably practicing to see how should sounded. if she sounded convincing enough
rcbsa159 1 month ago
Take notes guys--the set-up, the motive, the fake tears at her husband's "death," the little miss innocent act and denial even when caught red-handed--this is the average woman's moral compass.
misOBGYNist 4 months ago 19
@misOBGYNist Clever user name.
nathanjamesbaker 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist This the the average psychopths moral compass.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence What's the difference?
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist If you are trying to suggest there is no difference between psychopathy and being a female, then by your logic male psychopaths and hermaphrodites. The difference is psychopathy is a disorder, and female is a sex.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence According to Oxford: Sarcasm--the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
proofandevidence--a moron who thinks he is much smarter than he actually is.
; )
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@proofandevidence "...then by your logic male psychopaths and hermaphrodites." Finish your sentence moron. While you're working on your fragment, you forgot about fags such as yourself. ; )
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist That is actually an error, that was meant to be an are instead of an and, now replace those words, and let them guide you to the ignorance of the comment in question. Also, call me a fag to my face, and I will have it carved into yours.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence I'm aware of the ignorance of your comment thanks. Threatening to carve people's faces? Ooooh what anger and violence! I must have struck a nerve. Thanks for confirming what a moron you are by making such an idiotic statement that is tantamount to jealous drunk Mexican saying "I'll cut you man! " Lulz.
I think the real error here, is when your mom sat on that cum stained mattress bare assed in that motel after her last trick. Because that was the day you were conceived. XD
misOBGYNist 4 months ago 2
@misOBGYNist Again throwing insults from your computer chair, so again I dare you to say that to my face. But you're a pussy. And AGAIN you avoid the actual debate, on your comment, YOU said "what's the difference?" between women, and psychopathy! You moron, admit that this is one of the dumbest things you have ever said, because dude, that is fucking stupid. Can you or can you not tell the difference between a sex and a psychological disorder? If not, then you have a psychological disorder?
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence HINT: There is no actual debate moron. LOL @ the geek loser retard who still can't tell the difference between a sarcastic remark and a literal one. Ooooh and you really stepped it up there after that "I'll cut your face routine" with such a manly dare lmfao " I dare ya, I dare ya!" LOLZ
Pussy? I bet you couldn't tell the difference between a pussy and a hamburger--because you've never seen a pussy in your life, except for your mom's cat. XD
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist Dude you made a stupid comment, a really stupid one. Thank you for admitting it, and I've never seen a pussy? then what was I sticking my dick into her inner thigh? And I never said "I dare ya" I said I dare you, get it straight bitch. Stop making stupid comments you dirtbag, because one day somebody like me is going to punch you in the brain stem. And stop saying LULZ XD LOLZ, unless you think that makes you look cool, and in that case, your not. Eat shit dick licker.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence Now you're just desperately reaching. You were an idiot to take my comment literally and you know it. You failed to note obvious sarcasm. More cyber threats and elementary school insults. Your anger and rage seems to be growing. A sure sign that you're butthurt and owned. Must be pretty frustrating. ; )
misOBGYNist 4 months ago 2
@misOBGYNist I knew it was sarcams from the second I read it, I found it insulting to women, so I called you out for your stupid comment. You couldn't take it and cast the first insult, so who was "but hurt"? Thank you for not saying LOLZ or LULZ or XD, you came off alot less nerdy and I don't find anything frustrating, but I am wondering why it is that you would do the wink sign " ;) " to a grown man in more then one comment.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence Now you're totally contradicting yourself! And after walls of text insisting otherwise. Wow, you just keep digging yourself deeper and deeper. XD
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@proofandevidence Oh and you don't find anything frustrating? yeahhh right--that's why you're so butthurt and crying with each post with pure nerd rage! XD
Don't worry, I'll call the wahhhmbulance for you, as you enjoy your french cries, with a tall glass of haterade. XD
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist So please, if you make another comment towards me, no LULZ or LOLZ or XDs or wink faces ;) unless you are consciously trying to come across as a flamboyant homosexual.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence Only in your fag mind would you think such common 'emoticons' are homosexual. The taunts are obvious, (or should be--or would be if you weren't such a retard) as is your gay tendency to homosexuality the most trivial matter. XD LOLZ, LULZ!!!! ; )
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
EDIT: "Homosexualize," not homosexuality.
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist Wow how many comments did you just leave? Let us remember who made the first insult, you did, go read it, so that shows us who is "but hurt". And now you are guilty of saying, "LOLZ, LULZ, XD, wahhhmbulanc, french cries, and haterade." What grade are you in?
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist And you made the first comment, I pointed out she was a psychopath, I did not think it was not sarcasim until you said, "whats the difference?" I was not even commenting on your first comments point, I was saying she was a psychopath, saying whats the difference does not come across as sarcasm, I can't hear the tone of you voice in print. And YOU insulted me first, now your just acting like an immature little bitch. seriously wahhhmulance? You infant.
proofandevidence 4 months ago
@proofandevidence Translation: WAHHHHHHHH!!! WAHHHH!!!! LMFAO. XD
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist "WAHHHHHHHH!!! WAHHHH!!!! LMFAO. XD" <<< Translation: You're a fag.
proofandevidence 3 months ago
@proofandevidence "I dare ya, I dare ya!" Again? Finished cyber beating me up and cyber cutting my face yet?XD
AGAIN there is no debate. AGAIN you insist on taking an obviously sarcastic comment literally because you're too stupid to get it. AGAIN you are so butthurt that you are reaching, pleading, and begging in the hopes that I won't notice what you're trying to do. FAIL.
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist -- You are 100% correct and it's time for the courts to recognize this fact.
AdLaura 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist Wow...whoever you dated really did a number on you! Not all women are like that brother. Give someone a chance...
pitolove71 4 months ago
@pitolove71 Sorry to burst your bubble, but bitches don't do a number me, because I never give them a chance to. I got 99 problems but a bitch ain't one. ; )
misOBGYNist 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist Ha ha, fer sure! BUT there will come a time when you get older, like me, & you'll HAVE to settle down. That's when you're gonna have to find that special someone you can trust. Trust to sleep next to you, trust in your home, trust with your bank account. Unless you're gonna be single all your life...Just a thought. You'll find that hot chic that will be like your best friend! I wasn't looking & I did & life is good...Good luck.
pitolove71 4 months ago
@pitolove71 Oh you're talking about a real woman--a good woman--very, very rare. If you found one congrats--otherwise, you're a fool. Speaking of which..."Trust with your bank account?" You sure sound like a fool. Good luck with that.
misOBGYNist 3 months ago 4
@misOBGYNist all women are like this......most of the time they date guys to get a free lunch. guys are just too dumb to reason this shit.
REDTEAM22003 4 months ago
@REDTEAM22003 Yeah, most guys seem to be morons these days. Thanks to a mangina ridden society going down the tubes.
misOBGYNist 1 month ago
@misOBGYNist When a man looking for sex he is a perv but when a woman looking for sex its ok.....women are allow and get away with many things. Whats the different between a hooker and a wife?......the wife is cheaper.
REDTEAM22003 1 month ago
@REDTEAM22003 Correction--a whore is cheaper. A wife will take more than half your shit in divorce, the kids, hit you up for child support & alimony. You pay a whore, fuck her & she's gone. You fuck your wife, you have to support her, listen to her talk shit, put up with her, etc. A whore is way cheaper. ; )
misOBGYNist 1 month ago
@misOBGYNist oh yeah, another tom leykis lol fan, I love it =D
REDTEAM22003 1 month ago
@REDTEAM22003 Lol, we need Lykis back. Or someone to take his place to tell it like it is. Women are getting mad bc they see more & more men are waking up.
misOBGYNist 1 month ago
@misOBGYNist I missed type brotha =)
REDTEAM22003 1 month ago
Comment removed
Dicklle34 1 month ago
@Dicklle34 I read your comment and I'm not sure why you deleted it, except that it was stupid to question if it was real given the press. Feel stupid? : )
misOBGYNist 1 month ago
@misOBGYNist Yep.
k5lta 4 months ago
@misOBGYNist u mean the average snake bitch's moral compass. she doesn't deserve to be called a woman.
corcovadoquelindo 1 month ago
@corcovadoquelindo I stand corrected. I sometimes forget to use the appropriate word--BITCH, to describe the female. I apologize to real women everywhere.
misOBGYNist 1 month ago
she was better off doing it herself saying self defence, she only get 4 yrs
nathjroberts 4 months ago
but A for acting
MalikarVampire 4 months ago
#done
MalikarVampire 5 months ago
This women talks way to much - especially since she is guilty as sin. She should shut the muk up!
KevinVancouver2 5 months ago
This women talks way to much - especially since she is guilty as sin. She should shut the f cuk up!
KevinVancouver2 5 months ago
I love how she doesn't realize she's under arrest for the first few minutes on the interview.
talaxian1 5 months ago
@talaxian1 That's because this video was before she was arrested. She gets arrested in Part 2.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker She's arrested here. In the beginning of the video the officer is confirming she understands her rights. You are only read rights when you are under arrest. She had never been in trouble before, so not surprising she missed it.
talaxian1 5 months ago
@talaxian1 You can be read your rights without being arrested, for instance if you are a material witness or even a potential witness. The Miranda warning protects you from self-incrimination, which could occur before being arrested. Please watch Part 2 and you'll see her being arrested.
Anyway, I agree with you she's not very smart. What is not shown on camera is before part 1 when they tricked her into signing a form allowing all the video of her to be used on COPS.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker I have seen all videos. I have never heard of a witness being mirandized. How does that even work, you're a witness but you're allowed to remain silent? As far as I know, she is being arrested here. Essentially you're saying anytime a cop talks to someone they have to mirandize them first in case they incriminate themselves? You can be detained, handcuffed (for police safety), questioned and never be read any rights at all. So I'm not sure why she wouldn't be under arrest here.
talaxian1 5 months ago
@talaxian1 Did you see in part 2 where the interrogating cop tells her "you're under arrest for solicitation to commit murder?" That's when she was arrested. Before that she was being questioned. The key time the Miranda rights have to be read is before the person (especially a suspect or a material witness) is being questioned, even if they are not at that time being arrested.
I do agree with your basic point that she should have realized what was going on when she was read the rights.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
I'll have to read up on this, you may be right @nathanjamesbaker
talaxian1 5 months ago
@talaxian1 p.s. The other main factor that triggers the Miranda warning is when the person is in custody. So there are two factors: (1) being in custody and (2) before being questioned. This may or may not involve being arrested.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker Incorrect, she was under arrest the moment she was placed in cop car outside her home during the sting operation. An arrest need not be communicated to a suspect in order to occur. The police intended confinement, to charge her and she certainly was not "free to go". Her knowledge is actually irrelevant. You do not have to mirandize a suspect when they are arrested. You only need mirandize them before questioning. Telling her that "she was under arrest" in part two
bjvivs 5 months ago
@bjvivs There are two factors that trigger the Miranda warning, and both have to be present: (1) being in custody and (2) being interrogated. As to the first factor, the suspect's knowledge is absolutely relevant. The cops can tell her she is under arrest and that would qualify as being in custody, but there are other ways of being in custody without hearing the words "you're under arrest," and the test is what a reasonable person in the suspect's position would believe.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
A person is being subjected to a custodial interrogation if "a reasonable person would have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave." Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 112 (1995). The ultimate inquiry is whether a normal, reasonable person would feel free to end the encounter with law enforcement and leave the scene. Source: Wikipedia entry on Custodial interrogation.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
@bjvivs We can debate whether Dippolito knew (or should have known) she was in custody before she was told she was under arrest. But her understanding of whether she was in custody is absolutely relevant. And in this Part 1 video, she probably thought she was answering questions about her husband, not being placed under arrest. The cops played it safe and read her the rights at the outset. Otherwise, her attorneys might argue she knew she was in custody but was not Mirandized.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker I take issue with defining "under arrest" based on the knowledge of the suspect and the reasonableness test. The police could technically do everything they could to hide the fact that someone is under arrest and this would allow them to interrogate a suspect in custody without mirandizing them. (because condition 1 is not satisfied, because a reasonable person would not have believed that they were under arrest and therefore they were not under arrest). This is why I feel...
bjvivs 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker ... that the correct interpretation SHOULD be that time of arrest is determined by custody, communicated or not and the intention to detain by the police and knowledge, actual or implied, by detainee is irrelevant. That's the law in my jurisdiction and If I had to argue in court that Mrs Dipliotto was under arrest the moment she was in the back seat of the cruiser, I would win. I guess not in the US! Regardless, I feel in this particular investigation the police....
bjvivs 5 months ago
@nathanjamesbaker ... certainly acted fairly giving her every opportunity to come clean (or abandon the crime) before they presented her with their evidence.
bjvivs 5 months ago
... was simply their way of breaking the news to her. They were questioning her as a courtesy, to give her the opportunity to admit what she done before they told her the gig is up. Something I think is fair under these circumstances because criminals in "normal" situations always have the opportunity to fess up before the police have finished gathering evidence and that always helps during sentencing.
bjvivs 5 months ago
@talaxian1 I just realized that this video actually does show when they tricked her into signing a consent form to be videotaped for the COPS episode. It's at 1:50 in this video.
nathanjamesbaker 5 months ago
I wonder what the hell Michael Dippolito saw in that bitch. She's as ugly as she is stupid as she is downright evil! Good thing she'll be old and saggy when she's out of jail. She'll be cleaned out of the gene pool for good.
lago4 5 months ago