it really was a plane that hit, ffs follow the evidence. wtc's = controlled demolition, pentagon = hit by plane. you dont have to cling to every single wierd theory just cause it geos with the 'inside job' so well. ffs when you accept every cooky theory your just as bad as the sheeple that think arabians want to kill us.
Seriously, I've seen other airliner crashes, nothing look like the Pentagon except maybe Shanksville, PA. There are hundreds of cameras that captured that day at the Pentagon but we are only allowed to see 2? Where are the titanium engines? Where is the tail section? I guess it folded up also.
Why is Flight 93's "wreckage" which no one has ever seen, being stored a vault? Search:TOP Secret Government Facility (holds Flight 93 evidence)
yeah, for sure paid off in someway. so the wings on this plane folded, but not in towers 1 or 2, which were steel? so aluminun wings can slice through steel but not concrete. okay.........please
on the day, Mike admits the plane disappeared from view, then he saw a fireball explosion. The next day, talking with Bryant Gumbel he admits again that trees blocked his view of the plane when asked to clarify if the wings were level or left wing down...
then years later he claims to have seen the wings fold against the body and go into the small hole in an attempt to explain why the damage was so small...
THE Rolls Royce rb 211-535 engine IS HUGE AND NOT AROUND TO BE SEEN AND NO PROOF SHOW ME THE PLANE SO I CAN SEE IT SHOW ME THE MOTOR SO I CAN SEEE IT SHOW ME ANY PROOF YAH GOT THIS DUDE IS A LIER]
Thank you very much for making this video, Mr. Walter. The vast majority of 9/11 denial is based on misquotations such as the one which you've been a victim of. Having eyewitnesses set the record straight, the way you have here, makes it much easier to counter these claims. It makes much more of an impact when I can show someone this clip instead of just saying "oh, he was misquoted".
mike walter needs on-camera lessons. When you look around like at 1:06 you should loose your job. at 2:00 his comments CONTRADICT what happened at WTC: the WINGS went THRU SOLID STEEL. but at the Pentagon they folded back. And 1:35, "He's bothered by... but happy to answer questions" MIKE HAS A LOT OF EMOTIONS. expect a lot more questions, mike
Ha. All cruise missiles have FOLDING WINGS. So SHOW US THE VIDEO. Can't show us the money, because $4.5-TRILLION was missing from the Pentagon CAFR pension funds on Sept 10, 2001. My US Air Force job was explosive controlled demolition sabotage of US military bases, US aircraft and US nukes, using C4 and detonation cord. On 9/11, I had a class action for car theft against BFI, partner of Controlled Demolition Inc paid $3-billion to "demolish" WTC. Bush's Pet Goat was about a car thief...
Couldn't have seen the wings folding on impact, because after hitting 5 light posts, there would be no wings and a plane without wings doesn't fly. Here's a French web site, but it's all plainfull to see. Oh, we also see that kerose shoots yellow flames not red ones. (replace "dot" by ".")
/watch?v=HJNppgV7tFk&feature=related something like this was probably used...somehow he managed to get so detailed from an object flying at over 500 mph. according to this guy the fuselage (the hollow aluminum part that we sit in) managed to break thru 3 levels of reinforced concrete while the wings and engines (the strongest parts..u know, the parts that keep the plane up in the air) made no mark whatsoever by just simply folding back like a lawn chair, bunker busters are designed for this.
Look at this guy's eyes. does he have sort of disorder or is he just nervous about lying or nervous about telling the true which every something isnt right
Sorry dumbass UNTC. But the 2 are not mutually exclusive.
Wings strike and damage the walls, then (as the plane continues to plow forward) the wings fold back.
Two statements are not inconsistent. Walls were still damaged from the initial hit--and the force of the wall against the wings is what folded them back.
And apply those words and the way the 2 other planes hit the WTC 1 and 2..odd don't you think? in the video's of 9/11 those wings sliced steel! leaving an imprint.
Granted steel is different than the reinfored materials used on the pentagon. But 2 entirely different results...
Reminds me of bush saying "and the t.v was Obviously on" comment
Wings bending? funny bro. even if they had bent, there would be an initial imprint on the wall structure before bending into the hole. also, your eyes are moving wierd. I have a phychologist friend that tells me that you are not comfortable saying what you are saying. that your subconcious is battling with your consciousness. sorry, buddy. I am not buying it.
When you see someones eyes move quickly up-left (1st person top-right) they are constructing images in their head. A person looking up-left is using their imagination to put a picture together in their mind. Ask a person to imagine a large blue house filled with marbles and they should look up and t(the TV viewer left side!)
And you have proof of this do you? Who are these witnesses? Names please. Prove you are right.
Mike Walter is telling the truth & has been since day one. Its you 'truthers' that have deliberately been misquoting him for years. The many witnesses all say the same thing & the facts prove beyond doubt : American Airlines flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
fact: fuselage was not found. black box not released. why is his testimony unquestionable yet rodriguez, first responders and firefighters are all liars and wrong. end the debate release the pentagon video footage (not that ambiguous one released).
Rodriguez was a janitor at the WTC, not the Pentagon, & no-one is calling firefighters liars except certain ct's who think they were involved with 'WTC 7 demolition'
Do you think its right to release the black box recording of the pilots being murdered? How do you think the families concerned would feel?
So if other videos are released & they show nothing, would that end the debate?
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior disguised as Flight 77 paint job and all. It was retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
Even though all the evidence & eyewitness accounts point conclusively to AA77 hitting the Pentagon.
What happened to all the passengers on flight 77 if it wasnt the plane that hit? Are you suggesting the US Govt. killed all these people in cold blood. Are you saying all the calls from the plane to loved ones were fake?
The wings would have been thrown forward. If you pull the brakes on your bike suddenly or in your car, the body moves forward... no back! The wings wouldn't have folded back until they came into contact with the building. Mind bending!
Obviously lying, the government put the fear of God into that man, that's a damn shame, we all know it wasnt a damn plane, someone, anyone, show me a picture of wreckage...anywhere...anyone??? Thank you
Fact: 757 wreckage was found (It's 2007, you can find pics in about 10 seconds).
Fact: Crew/passenger's bodies recovered
Fact: Flight 77's black box recovered
Fact: There are hundreds more witnesses! The conspiracy goons only focused on this guy because he said on camera the word "cruise missile" in a live interview and they ran with it. The guy said he saw a plane hit RIGHT AFTER THE ATTACK!!
Oh yeah, and the missing 64 people on that flight.
"Fact: 757 wreckage was found (It's 2007, you can find pics in about 10 seconds).
Fact: Crew/passenger's bodies recovered
Fact: Flight 77's black box recovered"
Wow, if that's true, why did it take them until 2007 to recover these? 6 years is a long time to search through wreckage. But still not long enough to find the videotapes, of course.
y should i believe this guy...he said the wings folded back where did they go? i get his quote is out of context but i find it hard to believe he was able to identify the plane going 500 MPH on his way to work
I used to be a conspiracy nut, but then I grew up. You guys should too. When it's an actual conspiracy, you won't know about it. That's how conspiracies work.
how would know it was american airlines, it was moving at 500 mph, the guy is a newsman if he backs up the claim of conspiracy, he is through as a newsman. and by the way Mike, an airplane is a hollow tube not enough mass to make that damage.
So Mike, you saw the plane very clear and to date it is in your mind, but.....did you see the smoke? you don't say anything about it. And to see a plane with smoke is something to remember and talk about. KEEP THAT IN MIND :)
lol there are still naive ppl outthere who honestly believe that a commercial jet hit the pentagon and just vanished without burning down half of peantagon with this fires from hell like at the wtc towers.
stupid ppl deserve bush as president lol.let me be ur next dictator erm president
According to you Mr. Walters, you do not mention a nearly 1,000 foot long thick, white smoke coming from the supposedly damages starboard engine as displicted in the Pentagon Security CCTV video.
Conspiracy Theories are good for profiling purposes. If a person believes in a Conspiracy Theory it is safe to assume their IQ is below a 12. If person rejects a Conspiracy Theory, we can start at the average human IQ and work our way up from there. That's why I like Conspiracy Theories.
If you had reviewed the news tapes, listened to the radio of the eyewitness accounts, you would not be saying this was a cruise missile or drone. There were many people in their vehicles that watched the passanger air plane crash into the Pentagon.
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
I hope you can sleep at night, Mike, because....we ARE getting the facts. Lucky for you and the other perps SO FAR that your quote was taken out of context. But we know you were acting.
The wings are not strong enough to stand the impact but they are strong enough to remain attached to the plane and fold in and go inside the hole made by the plane at 500 m/h. Man.......HARD to believe. I think they should have broken off the plane and remain on the ground outside the building in small pieces. Yet nothing was found outside the bulding the says that at least a 757 crashed into the Pentagon.
im sorry but the gov. just isnt smart enough to pull of something that compicated ,its just to much, if you have more than five people in on a conspiracy i promise you that in a years time someones is going to say something to another person . Once that happens it is only a matter of time before the truth comes out. its a fact that humans suck at keeping secrets ,were sociale animals its our weak point
What the hell is motivating you troofer retards that you will immediately start insulting the guy who, two minutes ago, was your "evidence"? Why are you getting angry at him and not Dylan Avery? If you're "just asking questions" (as the troofers like to say), WHY do you block out everyone who tells you the answer?
where were all of u the day this happened? i was in front of the TV. i saw this guy do his first interview. he was freakin out. maybe i may be wrong, but i think our government has more important things to worry about than keep actors on the payroll: let alone trust them to keep quiet for 6 years?!?!
Here on YouTube take a look at "F 4 Phantom vs Wall." That might give you a view of what happens to an air craft, traveling at 500 mph, when it hits a solid object.
i saw his initial interview shortly after the hit. 1st he ID'd the plane then used the descriptive phrase, 'it was LIKE a cruise missle.' he never said it was a cruise missle. watch his initial interview before u judge him.
Wings folding, hummm should I agree without question and be a good American or should I put on my tin-foil hat? Can someone give me a few examples of commercial airliners that had wing folding on impact? What about those darn engines? If you believe this story, I feel sorry for you...
If it was a 757, why not release the Virgina Dept. of Transportation tape immediately to the public, let alone the other two tapes? This would prove inconclusively what hit the pentagon. There is only one reason not to release the tapes ladies and gentlemen; The footage on those tapes does not match the official report of an American airlines 757 hitting the Pentagon. PERIOD.
Exactly.Why are they still holding those tapes?Mike Walter got the fear of God put into him by the NSA.He had to change his story,or else he'd end up like Vince Foster.
if you've ever seen the footage of a fantom jet smashing into a several foot THICK wall of concrete at 500mph on rails as a test for nucrier bunkers you will see that the wings DO NOT FOLD IN! it was atomsied but only cuz the wall ate it up! the pentigon is not that strong! there should be 2 holes for the engines!
Neilditto wrote: Mike Walter why do you look away at certain points of your "Fancy explanation"?
I was thinking about the same thing, if he whitnessed this he wouldn't need to read a manuscript off of a piece of paper or whatever placed on the right side of the camera because the entire event itself would've etched itself in his mind so strongly that he wouldn't need a manuscript.
Really funny ! a video of an eyewitness haves only 2 stars and a video of dumb who say without proof there is no plane in pentagon has 4 at least. Bande de trouducs lol.
Compare it to the twin towers. The outline of the planes, wings and all.. were clearly visible. Those heavy, massive, titanium metal jet engines won't just "compress". Investigate 9/11.
teshnic, two different kinds of buildings your talking about. One is steel and one is pure concrete. Please show your evidene of a missile then or your witnesses that saw one. There isnt!
Mike Walter's comments seem to be finally getting thru. There seem to be less CTers than there used to be. Proof: Extrapolation of Alcoa down (2) days in a row.
directive 51 and commissions acts removed. And habeas corpus resorted.
You can be conspiracy theorist all day but even if we proved bush was guilty the next pres would just pardon him. Like Nixon was. So stop wasting effort on fruitless goals and start combating bushes polices
mike walter .....you bush orgy faggot. If you have any knowledge about missles...some serious big ones eject wings out when in motion. So those "little" wings you saw was wings on a missle. Oh yeah it was a plane....That's why the original video from the Gas Station got taken away right?? WUSA?? WHo do you think is in charge of this company? WHo do you think has the powers to threaten them what to say?
Ugh what a bunch of BS. The plane disappeared into thin air? GIVE US A BREAK!! Produce ONE PICTURE of a 757 at the pentagon, even the shreds of one. You can't! It isn't there! Shut up.
His acting gets worse and worse every time he opens his mouth. It's very funny really - I mean they expect you all to swallow this - it's their arrogance and stupidity that makes them so dangerous not their cunning.
he could not have been no closer than 900 ft, yet he says he SAW it crumple "like a little tin can." (pentagonresearchcom) 8 car lengths away, but didnt feel "any turbulence or wind force."...THE GUY IS A FAKE!
I posted a response a week ago where I ask you all to watch the news about the plane crash in Brasil last week. That's how a plane crash site looks like, it crashed into the airport.Youtube didn't post my message (????). Check it out, you'll find a boeing in the rubbles!
The brasil crash is a horrible example to prove your "theory". They are not even similar! You conspiracists are really pulling stuff out of your asses arnt ya? hahaha
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF transponders) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
Once again, two engines (6 tons each) folded inside the gap and went inside the building instead of breaking off the plane and remain outside. that I dont buy it. Remember, the speed is 500 m/h.Those wings break instead of folding.
Says who the wings break "neilditto"? See you conspiracist will never be happy. A freaking witness just told you what happened!!! He was there!! HE SAW IT!! But noooo you wont admit the jet did hit the pentagon. your probally goin to pull somethin out of your ass like any other conspiracist and say he works for the govt and he is "acting".
H says the wings are not strong enough to cause damage to the concrete wall so they fold ang go inside the gap left by the plane "instead of breaking off the plane and being left behind or aoutside the building along with the huge engines".I would like to see a plane going into a concrete wall and see the wings "folding in" so they dont leave any rubbles on the ground outside.
Would I have done what this guy just did? Nope! Every time I read or saw something about my quote, I would've been like, "You guys are idiots, that's not what happen!" Then stop reading or watching. I don't think I would have went through this length to set the record straight. I think this man is under pressure.
FFS! just release ALL the CCTV footage, Pentagon and private business FBI confiscated of whatever hit the facility 9/11 and made that 18 ft hole through three rings of the pentagon, the footage they initially claimed NEVER EXISTED.
after it hit the building..he said live on t.v. that it was like a missile with wings...now he says it was a huge plane..come on..this guy is a government muppet baby.
He said quite clearly he saw a plane hit the pentagon and then compared it to a cruise missile. At no time did he say it WAS a missile. Why is it idiot "truthers" have such trouble understanding what a simile is?
he is a government puppet..a boeing did not hit that building..not even close..look what he says after it happened..he said..i seen a 747 american airlines..who says that after a plane hit ? the actual company that owns the plane ? gimme a break
The wings folded back!! O.k say we agree for a minute they folded back, you would definitely have seen the wing tips intial impact damage on the concrete before it folded. I can't see any concrete crumbling damage at all where the wing tips should be. There is plenty of crash analysis software out there, run some tests to either prove or disprove it, please.
Your right! His argument makes sense for a while, until you remember "Hey, even if the wings of the Boeing 747 folded back, wouldn't the initial impact of the wings leave any traces on the building?" IDK just a thought.
I don't consider myself a conspiracist by any means. But I have learned through the years no be wary of the government. Couldn't the government put all this speculation to rest by releasing the videos that were available in and around the Pentagon?
I'm willing to bet that if they did released the video, that video would show a plane hitting the pentagon, not a missile. But the real question is: What kind of plane?
I like how this guy says the wings folded back but people always try to say the wings made damage on the side of the building. When wings fold back, wouldnt it make the hole bigger and not smaller?
wow they STRAPPED A CRUISE MISSLE onto an old jet(F-15 actually) painted like an A A jet. That's how the hole went clear thru all three rings of the pentagon, from A MISSLE ON A PAINTED F-15
Five yeats later and he suddenly remembers the wings "folded back" upon impact?? Yet many people defending the official story are saying that the engines and wings did leave visible damage and holes. Hell Popular Mechanics said the hole was about 90 feet across??? LMFAO
He didn't say he "suddenly" remembers it. You added that, why? To discredit him, obviously. He didn't say the wings did not do any damage either, you added that also, he simply stated they folded back. This is typical of you jack-ass's. Even after he clarifies it, you continue to misconstrue his statement.
get passionate about something other than blaming the U.S. for every problem ever conceived, go ahead and think of your clever insults to what im writing, all i know is Florida State got the top QB recruit to commit, and im damn happy about it, try it, America can actually be a fun place contrary to popular belief. If your gonna hate something for god sakes, yes i said god, for god sakes hate a sports team or another college or mexicans, it isnt that hard.
Considering the relitive press "Blackout" as regards the inconsitencies in the Official story and especially as regards the Pentagon and the lack of a plane. Turns out that a prime witness actually works for USA today and is used to sellling lies on air!
Hey Mike, careful when you choke on those words there. I see you're having trouble swallowing them. Since you're so sure of what you saw, why aren't any of the videos from around the pentagon showing the plane being made public. This is the most ridiculous explanation I've ever seen. Where are the body parts Mike?
I've seen wood beams penetrate brick wall if the velocity is high enough...and car doors, his explanation is rediculous, so he lacks credibility to me, just a convenient witness.
What happened to a full load of jet fuel and all those confiscated CCTV films? Snowygrouch 911 truth researcher 10pm GMT on Talksport radio UK June3 2007, listen on internet or to the podcast.
How did the "planes" that hit the WTC make a wide hole with the wings. The WTC was made of steel and the pentagon was made of concrete. So we are to imagine that concrete walls bend airplane wings but steel beams do not? This is absurd. This guy is lying.
The pentagon was made to be strong, most of its design would have gone into its strength. While the world trade center was designed to be reasonably strong, more of its design would have gone into looks and the inside. The spaced steel bars on the outside doesnt compare to the solid walls of the pentagon
This clip is like the man hiding behind the curtain in Wizard of OZ! If attack is planned you could blow the light posts & of course they'll hit a car or fall down in front of you...most people keep their hands on the wheel and their eyes upon the road. At 500 MPH & <blink> its right by you & now you see fireball.
What the F happened to the billions of dollar air defense system at that place? Why do the police officers at that gas station describe that it was impossible the plane was coming from the south, therefore making it impossible to knock over those light poles. They drew the path line seperate and they looked exactly the same, the Flight path doesn't add up.
Why is it one of your DOD officers, Sgt. Lagasse, said the plane did hit over poles and placed the poles 400 feet too far north, and if you correct his flight path, wallah it matches the official story :o)
Sgt lagasse placed the flight path over the highway about 400 feet north of the official story. He also placed the light poles that were knocked down and the cab 400 feet north of where we absolutely KNOW THEY WERE.
So, even though Lagasse is very credible and better person than you, he is probably just off by 400 feet north of ALL THE EVENTS!
Sgt. Lagassey: "you can take all the data we've given [talking about their interviews] and there is only one thing that is irrefutable, that isn't to be guesstimated, the fact is an American Airlines plane went from here [gesturing to left behind himself] into the building [gesturing forward]. that's it. ... I have no reason to lie, I have no reason to deceive anyone."
OK a little comment on "eye witnesses." I personally had the unfortunate experience of being one of the crisis counselors following the Columbine Shooting. One young lady told me how when she ran through the cafeteria there was blood ankle deep.
We all know that's not true, but its HER STORY and that is her truth.
Your logic would then say, "I don't agree with her theory" and then proclaim she is a Liar, and even suggest there were no shooting that day?
The wings did and if you did your research and stopped believing CTers you would know this. There is an impressive photo (no disrespect to those who died, intended) that shows a fire fighter looking at the outer wall of the Pentagon. You can see exactly where the left wing struck and it destroyed the Kevlar siding, exposed the steel structure, but the wall held...
Why is it all those witnesses that day are liars. There are over a hundred that collaborate there was a large Jet Airliner. 19 reported it hitting Light Poles, 25 identified it as American Airlines, etc...
And those quoted in media, how many more haven't been interviewed?
controled media shull!!! this guy is whorin out a book..Why didnt he tells us about where was all the dead bodies that were missing!!!Plus I don't recall seeing any plane engines within that rubble..If it was a plane then release the over 50 video footage caught by the highway camera and the video from the gas station and hotel?? USA 2 day gatekeep please explain that 2 me..OR maybe investage it!!!That will never happen cuz this guy is bought and paid 4!!!!
Ok Mike, where the hell are the dam wings? Engines? Anything? "They folded back..." and what? Finish your thought you're the journalist. No one thinks the wings should go in. I dont need a physics lesson from a story reteller. How about a mark, a scratch? Broken window next to the hole? No? Show us the goods. Show us the other footage. You're the journalist go get it for us. While you're at it bring us that big tarp covered container that they carted off too.
I'm not a ballistics expert but I certainly don't like the folding wings theory he proposes. at 800km/h they don't fold anywhere. I'd say that if he claims to have seen that he's lying
It was not a 757 because a 757 could not fly the flight path on record. It had to be a plane capable of the G forces exerted in the nose dive and turn, and then even so, no inexperienced pilot could do it as well. It was almost certainly a plane that RESEMBLED a large commercial jet, but at this speed, and if it had false markings, no news reporter would know what he saw. An A3 Skywarrior military bomber contolled by a QRS11 gyrochip could do this. A 757? Absolutely impossible.
Too bad what you are saying is incorrect. The majority of airline pilots agree that not only was the Pentagon flight possible, but it could've been done by an amateur as well.
What sample of your "majority" are you talking about? let me guess the pilots for truth.
How come when some dutch guys took a similar novice pilot and placed him in a professional simulator to train pilots to fly such aircraft it became quite apparent it was VERY POSSIBLE. The guy did it 3 out of 3 times!
BTW, .5 g's is all that decline and turn places on the aircraft. wow... and to thing its designed for well over 2!
Isn't it sad that a person corrects misquotes, tries to stop the real spin by CTers, and his rating is low and no one hardly views his video. It just proves how CTers are mob mentality and don't fact check. Otherwise they would be buzzing around this video discussing the validity of it... but no... the troothers are actually tin hatters...
Mark Faram, writer Navy Times [made controversial American Airlines wreckage photo]:
"That was the only piece of wreckage of any size that I saw, but was by no means the only piece. As I stepped onto the highway next to the triage area, I knelt down to tie my shoe and all over the highway were small pieces of aircraft skin, none bigger than a half-dollar."
Will Jarvis, Pentagon employee 300 meters from the impact:
"There was just nothing left. It was incinerated. We couldn't see a tail or a wing or anything... Then I saw little bits of silver falling from the sky."
Don Fortunato, detective who arrived a few minutes after the impact on the scene:
"Traffic was at a standstill, so I parked on the shoulder, not far from the scene and ran to the site. Next to me was a cab from D.C., its windshield smashed out by pieces of lampposts. There were pieces of the plane all over the highway, pieces of wing, I think..."
"I remember vividly that as I turned off my cell phone I was watching the almost serene image of thick pieces of flaming fiberglass insulation floating down onto the highway."
Mark Faram, writer Navy Times [made controversial American Airlines wreckage photo]:
"That was the only piece of wreckage of any size that I saw, but was by no means the only piece. As I stepped onto the highway next to the triage area, I knelt down to tie my shoe and all over the highway were small pieces of aircraft skin, none bigger than a half-dollar.
it really was a plane that hit, ffs follow the evidence. wtc's = controlled demolition, pentagon = hit by plane. you dont have to cling to every single wierd theory just cause it geos with the 'inside job' so well. ffs when you accept every cooky theory your just as bad as the sheeple that think arabians want to kill us.
KritikalDimensions 3 years ago
haha ... what a joker!
fanfan5000 3 years ago 18
"please believe me, my career hinges on it"!
Seriously, I've seen other airliner crashes, nothing look like the Pentagon except maybe Shanksville, PA. There are hundreds of cameras that captured that day at the Pentagon but we are only allowed to see 2? Where are the titanium engines? Where is the tail section? I guess it folded up also.
Why is Flight 93's "wreckage" which no one has ever seen, being stored a vault? Search:TOP Secret Government Facility (holds Flight 93 evidence)
grester 3 years ago 14
yeah, for sure paid off in someway. so the wings on this plane folded, but not in towers 1 or 2, which were steel? so aluminun wings can slice through steel but not concrete. okay.........please
sheldy29 3 years ago 15
Bullshit. He has been coached. First off a 757 at 500mph would destroy itself in mid flight.
Second off if he saw the wings fold in, then he saw the engines fold in ? hahahaha
Simple physics would have ripped the engines off the wings and they would continue forward.
Where are the engines? They would be sitting inside the front of the Pentagon. There would be more than 1 hole.
I have seen cruise missles. In all the videos I've seen. A cruise missle hit the Pentagon.
kabster 3 years ago 10
sweeet he saw the wings fold like this??!! damn man he has an eye of an eagle!
even though i believe its just a myth, but im pretty sure this guy was full of S...
mrkhalid84 3 years ago 12
watch?v=DVUh6iflAYU
on the day, Mike admits the plane disappeared from view, then he saw a fireball explosion. The next day, talking with Bryant Gumbel he admits again that trees blocked his view of the plane when asked to clarify if the wings were level or left wing down...
then years later he claims to have seen the wings fold against the body and go into the small hole in an attempt to explain why the damage was so small...
was he lying then or lying now?
wakenbake22 3 years ago 13
THE Rolls Royce rb 211-535 engine IS HUGE AND NOT AROUND TO BE SEEN AND NO PROOF SHOW ME THE PLANE SO I CAN SEE IT SHOW ME THE MOTOR SO I CAN SEEE IT SHOW ME ANY PROOF YAH GOT THIS DUDE IS A LIER]
xerochaos187 3 years ago
but the fan disk is exactly the size of the disk found
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Thank you very much for making this video, Mr. Walter. The vast majority of 9/11 denial is based on misquotations such as the one which you've been a victim of. Having eyewitnesses set the record straight, the way you have here, makes it much easier to counter these claims. It makes much more of an impact when I can show someone this clip instead of just saying "oh, he was misquoted".
c6gunner 3 years ago
truther lie 7- buildings brought down by fire alone, only truthers claim this.
turther lie 8 - hijackers not on flight manifest
truther lie 9- missing trillions
and the number ten lie told by truthers
larry silverstein gave order to pull wtc7, when in fact it was fire cheif nigro who gave that order
Truthers tend too lie alot !!!
mattfactsof911 3 years ago
Why do truthers lie/ money and fame
Truther lie 1 hole in pentagon ring e only 16 ft, when in fact hole is 70 ft
Truther lie 2- engine debris doesn't match flight 77 , when the debris does match a Rolls Royce rb 211-535 engine
truther lie 3- hijackers still alive
truther lie 4- thermite residue found, no barium nitrate this means no thermite Mr jones won't tell you this
truther lie 5- bomb sniffing dogs remove
mattfactsof911 3 years ago
These commentators imaginations and what they wish was facts are stronger than this real life witness acount?!? WHAT A JOKE.
preludesz 3 years ago
the pentagon and the WTC are 2 buildings Built totaly diffrent.
quazzy690 3 years ago
mike walter needs on-camera lessons. When you look around like at 1:06 you should loose your job. at 2:00 his comments CONTRADICT what happened at WTC: the WINGS went THRU SOLID STEEL. but at the Pentagon they folded back. And 1:35, "He's bothered by... but happy to answer questions" MIKE HAS A LOT OF EMOTIONS. expect a lot more questions, mike
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
it's not that we dont understand what he said. we just know its not true. cant change the rules of physics over night, not even america.
ddpxl 3 years ago
Ha. All cruise missiles have FOLDING WINGS. So SHOW US THE VIDEO. Can't show us the money, because $4.5-TRILLION was missing from the Pentagon CAFR pension funds on Sept 10, 2001. My US Air Force job was explosive controlled demolition sabotage of US military bases, US aircraft and US nukes, using C4 and detonation cord. On 9/11, I had a class action for car theft against BFI, partner of Controlled Demolition Inc paid $3-billion to "demolish" WTC. Bush's Pet Goat was about a car thief...
apolloscam 3 years ago
Couldn't have seen the wings folding on impact, because after hitting 5 light posts, there would be no wings and a plane without wings doesn't fly. Here's a French web site, but it's all plainfull to see. Oh, we also see that kerose shoots yellow flames not red ones. (replace "dot" by ".")
truveo(dot)com/pentagone-vol-77analyse-de-limposture/id/885121489
Juicexlx 4 years ago
/watch?v=HJNppgV7tFk&feature=related something like this was probably used...somehow he managed to get so detailed from an object flying at over 500 mph. according to this guy the fuselage (the hollow aluminum part that we sit in) managed to break thru 3 levels of reinforced concrete while the wings and engines (the strongest parts..u know, the parts that keep the plane up in the air) made no mark whatsoever by just simply folding back like a lawn chair, bunker busters are designed for this.
TIKOMIX 4 years ago
Yeah, the plane flew in at near-ground level... How stupid do they think we are.
alphabeets 4 years ago
No kidding. This guy has a smirk on his face this whole interview.
glingding 4 years ago
Look at this guy's eyes. does he have sort of disorder or is he just nervous about lying or nervous about telling the true which every something isnt right
Toa41587 4 years ago
did u watch the whole video?
cschin11 4 years ago
Yeah, and the plane vaporized, surrre.
marcjtdc 4 years ago
"Wow."I saw this plane, a jet." How can people misconstrue that?"
Exactly. there IS NO ambiguity.
"I saw this plane, a jet; an american airlines jet coming..."
Clearly, he identified the AA jet. Twoofers--in their relentless persuit of TRUTH (giggle) simply misquote him intentionally.
So much for the conspiracy idiots "just seeking the honest truth."
Honest truth, every witness saw it. All saw a jetliner, excet one who thought it was a small corp jet.
EdgemanLL2 4 years ago 2
Wings folded back? Um, they didn't exactly fold back when they hit the trade centers. What were those buildings made out of? Marshmallow?
burns1210 4 years ago
"The wings folded back" sorry dumb ass news guy. 9/11 debunked states the wall damage is consistant with a wing striking it, not "they folded back"
UNTC321 4 years ago
Sorry dumbass UNTC. But the 2 are not mutually exclusive.
Wings strike and damage the walls, then (as the plane continues to plow forward) the wings fold back.
Two statements are not inconsistent. Walls were still damaged from the initial hit--and the force of the wall against the wings is what folded them back.
EdgemanLL2 4 years ago
Strange phenomenon listen to 1:50-2:20
And apply those words and the way the 2 other planes hit the WTC 1 and 2..odd don't you think? in the video's of 9/11 those wings sliced steel! leaving an imprint.
Granted steel is different than the reinfored materials used on the pentagon. But 2 entirely different results...
Reminds me of bush saying "and the t.v was Obviously on" comment
realistromeo 4 years ago 4
Wings bending? funny bro. even if they had bent, there would be an initial imprint on the wall structure before bending into the hole. also, your eyes are moving wierd. I have a phychologist friend that tells me that you are not comfortable saying what you are saying. that your subconcious is battling with your consciousness. sorry, buddy. I am not buying it.
15anerachoreographer 4 years ago
Wow."I saw this plane, a jet." How can people misconstrue that?
He was using a simile to describe the impact of the jet, not what he saw flying.
slrevare 4 years ago
I think someone took him aside and explained about losing employment benefits.
stratocaster539 4 years ago
That must have been a nice little earner for him.
stratocaster539 4 years ago
Eyes to the Upper Left (Viewer side)
When you see someones eyes move quickly up-left (1st person top-right) they are constructing images in their head. A person looking up-left is using their imagination to put a picture together in their mind. Ask a person to imagine a large blue house filled with marbles and they should look up and t(the TV viewer left side!)
grabillion 4 years ago
Silly 9/11 CT almost always distort people's statements.
overmind25 4 years ago
Silly hired debunkers like you are traitors!
MustacheVerra 4 years ago
this guy is a paid liar! His statement contradicts all real witnesses and what they saw. You should be behind bars my friend!:)
marcusjansen239369 4 years ago
And you have proof of this do you? Who are these witnesses? Names please. Prove you are right.
Mike Walter is telling the truth & has been since day one. Its you 'truthers' that have deliberately been misquoting him for years. The many witnesses all say the same thing & the facts prove beyond doubt : American Airlines flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
terrymanning1 4 years ago
fact: fuselage was not found. black box not released. why is his testimony unquestionable yet rodriguez, first responders and firefighters are all liars and wrong. end the debate release the pentagon video footage (not that ambiguous one released).
thewholesoul 4 years ago
Fact: fuselage WAS found at the Pentagon.
Rodriguez was a janitor at the WTC, not the Pentagon, & no-one is calling firefighters liars except certain ct's who think they were involved with 'WTC 7 demolition'
Do you think its right to release the black box recording of the pilots being murdered? How do you think the families concerned would feel?
So if other videos are released & they show nothing, would that end the debate?
terrymanning1 4 years ago
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior disguised as Flight 77 paint job and all. It was retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
And you have proof of this do you?
Even though all the evidence & eyewitness accounts point conclusively to AA77 hitting the Pentagon.
What happened to all the passengers on flight 77 if it wasnt the plane that hit? Are you suggesting the US Govt. killed all these people in cold blood. Are you saying all the calls from the plane to loved ones were fake?
terrymanning1 4 years ago
he is too eloquent in talking. look like he had train to talk with the media
mingzhong78 4 years ago
He's a reporter you idiot, of course he's eloquent.
macman13 4 years ago 6
The wings would have been thrown forward. If you pull the brakes on your bike suddenly or in your car, the body moves forward... no back! The wings wouldn't have folded back until they came into contact with the building. Mind bending!
IzzySantino 4 years ago
OMG. Joking?
neverhoodyn 4 years ago
Obviously lying, the government put the fear of God into that man, that's a damn shame, we all know it wasnt a damn plane, someone, anyone, show me a picture of wreckage...anywhere...anyone??? Thank you
MisthangBx007 4 years ago
Fact: 757 wreckage was found (It's 2007, you can find pics in about 10 seconds).
Fact: Crew/passenger's bodies recovered
Fact: Flight 77's black box recovered
Fact: There are hundreds more witnesses! The conspiracy goons only focused on this guy because he said on camera the word "cruise missile" in a live interview and they ran with it. The guy said he saw a plane hit RIGHT AFTER THE ATTACK!!
Oh yeah, and the missing 64 people on that flight.
mikeusmc72 4 years ago 5
"Fact: 757 wreckage was found (It's 2007, you can find pics in about 10 seconds).
Fact: Crew/passenger's bodies recovered
Fact: Flight 77's black box recovered"
Wow, if that's true, why did it take them until 2007 to recover these? 6 years is a long time to search through wreckage. But still not long enough to find the videotapes, of course.
laconas 4 years ago 2
That's not what he said idiot. Read again.
neverhoodyn 4 years ago
y should i believe this guy...he said the wings folded back where did they go? i get his quote is out of context but i find it hard to believe he was able to identify the plane going 500 MPH on his way to work
burgess1988 4 years ago
WOW. Funny how 9/11 nutjobs TOTALLY took his comments out of context. He clearly said it was a jet that he saw.
crh1976 4 years ago 3
Whatch his eyes you can tell that he is lying!!!!
armond002 4 years ago
What a total lier. He was right the first time, a cruise missle with wings. He had to change his stiory in order to keep his pension.
nothwind 4 years ago
I used to be a conspiracy nut, but then I grew up. You guys should too. When it's an actual conspiracy, you won't know about it. That's how conspiracies work.
joealencar 4 years ago
How about you show me footage, or a picture, of any actual plane wreckage...from that day...from the pentagon...
MisthangBx007 4 years ago
Oh my God. Mike, this is so scary :| I mean, common man. "The wings folded." Have you seen the footage of the jets hitting the WTC towers?
THE WINGS ON THOSE PLANES DOESN'T FOLD...
WeaZear 4 years ago
The Pentagon is a SLIGHTLY different structure.......
oxomaticman 4 years ago
how would know it was american airlines, it was moving at 500 mph, the guy is a newsman if he backs up the claim of conspiracy, he is through as a newsman. and by the way Mike, an airplane is a hollow tube not enough mass to make that damage.
Kungpaul 4 years ago
yes, it was like a cruise missile with wings....well said dude
newsfrombelow 4 years ago
So Mike, you saw the plane very clear and to date it is in your mind, but.....did you see the smoke? you don't say anything about it. And to see a plane with smoke is something to remember and talk about. KEEP THAT IN MIND :)
neilditto 4 years ago
mike, you saw the wings fold back?????
you saw the wings fold back???
newsfrombelow 4 years ago
lol there are still naive ppl outthere who honestly believe that a commercial jet hit the pentagon and just vanished without burning down half of peantagon with this fires from hell like at the wtc towers.
stupid ppl deserve bush as president lol.let me be ur next dictator erm president
horror11 4 years ago
Hey Mike, how much money did you get to do this statement???
MikeleJackass 4 years ago
According to you Mr. Walters, you do not mention a nearly 1,000 foot long thick, white smoke coming from the supposedly damages starboard engine as displicted in the Pentagon Security CCTV video.
Scriptor4O9 4 years ago
Conspiracy Theories are good for profiling purposes. If a person believes in a Conspiracy Theory it is safe to assume their IQ is below a 12. If person rejects a Conspiracy Theory, we can start at the average human IQ and work our way up from there. That's why I like Conspiracy Theories.
davidcaspian 4 years ago
the official theory remains a THEORY till today.
and this theory is including 20 or more islamist that conspired to atack the USA.
so actually everyone beilves in a CT. time to do some real INDEPENDENT investigations.
Aanthanur 4 years ago
If you had reviewed the news tapes, listened to the radio of the eyewitness accounts, you would not be saying this was a cruise missile or drone. There were many people in their vehicles that watched the passanger air plane crash into the Pentagon.
Unklebillybob 4 years ago
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
Show us the evidence "OperationKnuckleHead". Oh that's right, you have NO EVIDENCE just a demented mind.
devilock68 4 years ago
I hope you can sleep at night, Mike, because....we ARE getting the facts. Lucky for you and the other perps SO FAR that your quote was taken out of context. But we know you were acting.
apocalypsynch 4 years ago
YOUR A DAM LIAR
zurrrr1 4 years ago
The wings are not strong enough to stand the impact but they are strong enough to remain attached to the plane and fold in and go inside the hole made by the plane at 500 m/h. Man.......HARD to believe. I think they should have broken off the plane and remain on the ground outside the building in small pieces. Yet nothing was found outside the bulding the says that at least a 757 crashed into the Pentagon.
neilditto 4 years ago
im sorry but the gov. just isnt smart enough to pull of something that compicated ,its just to much, if you have more than five people in on a conspiracy i promise you that in a years time someones is going to say something to another person . Once that happens it is only a matter of time before the truth comes out. its a fact that humans suck at keeping secrets ,were sociale animals its our weak point
mjmojo72 4 years ago 2
What the hell is motivating you troofer retards that you will immediately start insulting the guy who, two minutes ago, was your "evidence"? Why are you getting angry at him and not Dylan Avery? If you're "just asking questions" (as the troofers like to say), WHY do you block out everyone who tells you the answer?
jxhensley 4 years ago 3
Yeah and if there's anybody we trust it's the members of the media.. it's impossible that a 757 hit that building.
mistaspot1 4 years ago
where were all of u the day this happened? i was in front of the TV. i saw this guy do his first interview. he was freakin out. maybe i may be wrong, but i think our government has more important things to worry about than keep actors on the payroll: let alone trust them to keep quiet for 6 years?!?!
coconutsboi 4 years ago
is it just me or is the supposedly random eyewitness an actor or something, hes promoting a book too? thats a little strange
shiftyinthacity 4 years ago
I believe this guy to the extent that it looks like he's lying his ass off about everything he saw.
CACBCCCU 4 years ago
Sorry Mike, but I still don't buy that theory of wings folding in at 500 m/h. That's what I keep in mind.
neilditto 4 years ago
Here on YouTube take a look at "F 4 Phantom vs Wall." That might give you a view of what happens to an air craft, traveling at 500 mph, when it hits a solid object.
Unklebillybob 4 years ago
i saw his initial interview shortly after the hit. 1st he ID'd the plane then used the descriptive phrase, 'it was LIKE a cruise missle.' he never said it was a cruise missle. watch his initial interview before u judge him.
newinfrance2001 4 years ago
Wings folding, hummm should I agree without question and be a good American or should I put on my tin-foil hat? Can someone give me a few examples of commercial airliners that had wing folding on impact? What about those darn engines? If you believe this story, I feel sorry for you...
marques99 4 years ago
If it was a 757, why not release the Virgina Dept. of Transportation tape immediately to the public, let alone the other two tapes? This would prove inconclusively what hit the pentagon. There is only one reason not to release the tapes ladies and gentlemen; The footage on those tapes does not match the official report of an American airlines 757 hitting the Pentagon. PERIOD.
geodaddy1978 4 years ago
Exactly.Why are they still holding those tapes?Mike Walter got the fear of God put into him by the NSA.He had to change his story,or else he'd end up like Vince Foster.
Dickgozinya69 4 years ago
Incorrect. Mike has never changed his story. His description of a "cruise missle with wings" was taken literally when it was a conceptual phrase.
wusa9newsnow 4 years ago
if you've ever seen the footage of a fantom jet smashing into a several foot THICK wall of concrete at 500mph on rails as a test for nucrier bunkers you will see that the wings DO NOT FOLD IN! it was atomsied but only cuz the wall ate it up! the pentigon is not that strong! there should be 2 holes for the engines!
xzonyx 4 years ago
The initial hole in the Pentagon was over 50' in width. Plenty big enough for the fuselage and engines.
glennwall2 4 years ago
Neilditto wrote: Mike Walter why do you look away at certain points of your "Fancy explanation"?
I was thinking about the same thing, if he whitnessed this he wouldn't need to read a manuscript off of a piece of paper or whatever placed on the right side of the camera because the entire event itself would've etched itself in his mind so strongly that he wouldn't need a manuscript.
tivook 4 years ago
Really funny ! a video of an eyewitness haves only 2 stars and a video of dumb who say without proof there is no plane in pentagon has 4 at least. Bande de trouducs lol.
levalentinoy 4 years ago
You want to go with the 'folding wings' theory..?
Compare it to the twin towers. The outline of the planes, wings and all.. were clearly visible. Those heavy, massive, titanium metal jet engines won't just "compress". Investigate 9/11.
teshnic 4 years ago
teshnic, two different kinds of buildings your talking about. One is steel and one is pure concrete. Please show your evidene of a missile then or your witnesses that saw one. There isnt!
bcarns 4 years ago
why not get a real Boeing(one not in use) and sit it at the same position as this "thing" and see if it is a plane, problem solved
1L0V3C1IT 4 years ago
Mike Walter's comments seem to be finally getting thru. There seem to be less CTers than there used to be. Proof: Extrapolation of Alcoa down (2) days in a row.
l8rthen 4 years ago
1. I don't believe it was inside job.
2. Bush went overboard and turned into a monster of revenge and hate.
3. War ends regardless if it was inside job or not that is no longer relevant what is getting the patriot act,
xiola696969 4 years ago
directive 51 and commissions acts removed. And habeas corpus resorted.
You can be conspiracy theorist all day but even if we proved bush was guilty the next pres would just pardon him. Like Nixon was. So stop wasting effort on fruitless goals and start combating bushes polices
xiola696969 4 years ago
mike walter .....you bush orgy faggot. If you have any knowledge about missles...some serious big ones eject wings out when in motion. So those "little" wings you saw was wings on a missle. Oh yeah it was a plane....That's why the original video from the Gas Station got taken away right?? WUSA?? WHo do you think is in charge of this company? WHo do you think has the powers to threaten them what to say?
IvanTerrace 4 years ago
Duh, WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB?
I CAN'T SEE ANY.
EVEN IF YOU SHOW IT TO ME.
EVEN IF IT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY STUPID FACE.
I ONLY BELIEVE IN THE FAITH-BASED OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY, LIKE MOST RETARDS.
WAQoWAQjob 4 years ago
Ugh what a bunch of BS. The plane disappeared into thin air? GIVE US A BREAK!! Produce ONE PICTURE of a 757 at the pentagon, even the shreds of one. You can't! It isn't there! Shut up.
hollymaria 4 years ago
a liar, part of DoD's dis-info force.
Xterraman 4 years ago
His acting gets worse and worse every time he opens his mouth. It's very funny really - I mean they expect you all to swallow this - it's their arrogance and stupidity that makes them so dangerous not their cunning.
jddskench 4 years ago
I wish the tin foil hat crowd understood the first thing about evidence instead of regurgitating Alex jones propaganda.
Wez666 4 years ago
he could not have been no closer than 900 ft, yet he says he SAW it crumple "like a little tin can." (pentagonresearchcom) 8 car lengths away, but didnt feel "any turbulence or wind force."...THE GUY IS A FAKE!
denbenenki 4 years ago
Mike Walter why do you look away at certain points of your "Fancy explanation"?
neilditto 4 years ago
I posted a response a week ago where I ask you all to watch the news about the plane crash in Brasil last week. That's how a plane crash site looks like, it crashed into the airport.Youtube didn't post my message (????). Check it out, you'll find a boeing in the rubbles!
neilditto 4 years ago
The brasil crash is a horrible example to prove your "theory". They are not even similar! You conspiracists are really pulling stuff out of your asses arnt ya? hahaha
bcarns 4 years ago
Was either paid off or threatened with his job
airjamin8tor 4 years ago
Lol. Go ahead and believe that. You're allowed to stick with your ridiculous conspiracy theories...
Andokool12 4 years ago
"OPEN YOUR MIND!" ups, what this mean?
nanocockroach 4 years ago
If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders (Mode 4 or Mode 5 IFF transponders) and radio-radar-navigation systems.
OperationMockingbird 4 years ago
Once again, two engines (6 tons each) folded inside the gap and went inside the building instead of breaking off the plane and remain outside. that I dont buy it. Remember, the speed is 500 m/h.Those wings break instead of folding.
neilditto 4 years ago
Says who the wings break "neilditto"? See you conspiracist will never be happy. A freaking witness just told you what happened!!! He was there!! HE SAW IT!! But noooo you wont admit the jet did hit the pentagon. your probally goin to pull somethin out of your ass like any other conspiracist and say he works for the govt and he is "acting".
bcarns 4 years ago
Wow, thank you for posting this.
sirmarkthomas 4 years ago
H says the wings are not strong enough to cause damage to the concrete wall so they fold ang go inside the gap left by the plane "instead of breaking off the plane and being left behind or aoutside the building along with the huge engines".I would like to see a plane going into a concrete wall and see the wings "folding in" so they dont leave any rubbles on the ground outside.
neilditto 4 years ago
There is a video of a plane hitting a wall and the WHOLE plane becomes TINY pieces.Just do some home work guys and don't just believe the nut jobs.
SWC11 4 years ago
Would I have done what this guy just did? Nope! Every time I read or saw something about my quote, I would've been like, "You guys are idiots, that's not what happen!" Then stop reading or watching. I don't think I would have went through this length to set the record straight. I think this man is under pressure.
noeyed210 4 years ago
FFS! just release ALL the CCTV footage, Pentagon and private business FBI confiscated of whatever hit the facility 9/11 and made that 18 ft hole through three rings of the pentagon, the footage they initially claimed NEVER EXISTED.
MarkB1ngham 4 years ago
after it hit the building..he said live on t.v. that it was like a missile with wings...now he says it was a huge plane..come on..this guy is a government muppet baby.
toneetouchless 4 years ago
He said quite clearly he saw a plane hit the pentagon and then compared it to a cruise missile. At no time did he say it WAS a missile. Why is it idiot "truthers" have such trouble understanding what a simile is?
drxym 4 years ago
he is a government puppet..a boeing did not hit that building..not even close..look what he says after it happened..he said..i seen a 747 american airlines..who says that after a plane hit ? the actual company that owns the plane ? gimme a break
toneetouchless 4 years ago
The wings folded back!! O.k say we agree for a minute they folded back, you would definitely have seen the wing tips intial impact damage on the concrete before it folded. I can't see any concrete crumbling damage at all where the wing tips should be. There is plenty of crash analysis software out there, run some tests to either prove or disprove it, please.
TARTAN74 4 years ago
Your right! His argument makes sense for a while, until you remember "Hey, even if the wings of the Boeing 747 folded back, wouldn't the initial impact of the wings leave any traces on the building?" IDK just a thought.
Kcinonamor 4 years ago
I don't consider myself a conspiracist by any means. But I have learned through the years no be wary of the government. Couldn't the government put all this speculation to rest by releasing the videos that were available in and around the Pentagon?
faesq 4 years ago
I'm willing to bet that if they did released the video, that video would show a plane hitting the pentagon, not a missile. But the real question is: What kind of plane?
noeyed210 4 years ago
I like how this guy says the wings folded back but people always try to say the wings made damage on the side of the building. When wings fold back, wouldnt it make the hole bigger and not smaller?
DirtCheap 4 years ago
wheres the pentagon video?can i see it?over 80 cameras
on the pentagon??show it to us cheney
rockondon 4 years ago
the facts are there was no plane a missle did indeed
hit the pentagon..THE FACTS ARE ON THE VIDEO YOR GOV
WONT SHOW YU?????WHY WHAT R THEY HIDING?
rockondon 4 years ago
wow they STRAPPED A CRUISE MISSLE onto an old jet(F-15 actually) painted like an A A jet. That's how the hole went clear thru all three rings of the pentagon, from A MISSLE ON A PAINTED F-15
earthpains 4 years ago
Five yeats later and he suddenly remembers the wings "folded back" upon impact?? Yet many people defending the official story are saying that the engines and wings did leave visible damage and holes. Hell Popular Mechanics said the hole was about 90 feet across??? LMFAO
daliOtter 4 years ago
He didn't say he "suddenly" remembers it. You added that, why? To discredit him, obviously. He didn't say the wings did not do any damage either, you added that also, he simply stated they folded back. This is typical of you jack-ass's. Even after he clarifies it, you continue to misconstrue his statement.
You got nothing, twat face, so you piss and moan.
oakheadfootball 4 years ago
OK, so where are the pieces of the supposed cruise missile and where are the passengers of the plane that "disappeared" into thin air?
euskadi71 4 years ago
The mexicans thing was a joke, humor, something you people should also invest time in.
GASeminole10 4 years ago
get passionate about something other than blaming the U.S. for every problem ever conceived, go ahead and think of your clever insults to what im writing, all i know is Florida State got the top QB recruit to commit, and im damn happy about it, try it, America can actually be a fun place contrary to popular belief. If your gonna hate something for god sakes, yes i said god, for god sakes hate a sports team or another college or mexicans, it isnt that hard.
GASeminole10 4 years ago
Considering the relitive press "Blackout" as regards the inconsitencies in the Official story and especially as regards the Pentagon and the lack of a plane. Turns out that a prime witness actually works for USA today and is used to sellling lies on air!
djmdb 4 years ago
Hey Mike, careful when you choke on those words there. I see you're having trouble swallowing them. Since you're so sure of what you saw, why aren't any of the videos from around the pentagon showing the plane being made public. This is the most ridiculous explanation I've ever seen. Where are the body parts Mike?
allgamesradio 4 years ago
where's the body parts? human remains?
aqwuan 4 years ago
I've seen wood beams penetrate brick wall if the velocity is high enough...and car doors, his explanation is rediculous, so he lacks credibility to me, just a convenient witness.
The lie is greater the higher up you go...
brokencasket 4 years ago
What happened to a full load of jet fuel and all those confiscated CCTV films? Snowygrouch 911 truth researcher 10pm GMT on Talksport radio UK June3 2007, listen on internet or to the podcast.
MarkB1ngham 4 years ago
Lose the teleprompter.
SmokescreenNinjaz 4 years ago
How did the "planes" that hit the WTC make a wide hole with the wings. The WTC was made of steel and the pentagon was made of concrete. So we are to imagine that concrete walls bend airplane wings but steel beams do not? This is absurd. This guy is lying.
soapranos 4 years ago
The pentagon was made to be strong, most of its design would have gone into its strength. While the world trade center was designed to be reasonably strong, more of its design would have gone into looks and the inside. The spaced steel bars on the outside doesnt compare to the solid walls of the pentagon
atecom 4 years ago
This clip is like the man hiding behind the curtain in Wizard of OZ! If attack is planned you could blow the light posts & of course they'll hit a car or fall down in front of you...most people keep their hands on the wheel and their eyes upon the road. At 500 MPH & <blink> its right by you & now you see fireball.
HANGINJUDGE1 4 years ago
Correction, this guy is not hiding behind a curtain :op
He is actually standing up for the truth, and spin all you want but for you CT reality to exist you have to call him and 100 plus other people liars!
kokororyu 4 years ago
What the F happened to the billions of dollar air defense system at that place? Why do the police officers at that gas station describe that it was impossible the plane was coming from the south, therefore making it impossible to knock over those light poles. They drew the path line seperate and they looked exactly the same, the Flight path doesn't add up.
jcline87 4 years ago
Why is it one of your DOD officers, Sgt. Lagasse, said the plane did hit over poles and placed the poles 400 feet too far north, and if you correct his flight path, wallah it matches the official story :o)
I wonder why you missed that part?
kokororyu 4 years ago
Sgt lagasse placed the flight path over the highway about 400 feet north of the official story. He also placed the light poles that were knocked down and the cab 400 feet north of where we absolutely KNOW THEY WERE.
So, even though Lagasse is very credible and better person than you, he is probably just off by 400 feet north of ALL THE EVENTS!
kokororyu 4 years ago
Here's your officer:
Sgt. Lagassey: "you can take all the data we've given [talking about their interviews] and there is only one thing that is irrefutable, that isn't to be guesstimated, the fact is an American Airlines plane went from here [gesturing to left behind himself] into the building [gesturing forward]. that's it. ... I have no reason to lie, I have no reason to deceive anyone."
kokororyu 4 years ago
OK a little comment on "eye witnesses." I personally had the unfortunate experience of being one of the crisis counselors following the Columbine Shooting. One young lady told me how when she ran through the cafeteria there was blood ankle deep.
We all know that's not true, but its HER STORY and that is her truth.
Your logic would then say, "I don't agree with her theory" and then proclaim she is a Liar, and even suggest there were no shooting that day?
kokororyu 4 years ago
The wings did and if you did your research and stopped believing CTers you would know this. There is an impressive photo (no disrespect to those who died, intended) that shows a fire fighter looking at the outer wall of the Pentagon. You can see exactly where the left wing struck and it destroyed the Kevlar siding, exposed the steel structure, but the wall held...
kokororyu 4 years ago
*sigh*what a bad story.
rkoguy 4 years ago
"wait a minute somethings wrong here" is what he is thinking when he sees a 757 flying 100 feet off the ground. lol. what a douche liar
viktorj85 4 years ago
Why is it all those witnesses that day are liars. There are over a hundred that collaborate there was a large Jet Airliner. 19 reported it hitting Light Poles, 25 identified it as American Airlines, etc...
And those quoted in media, how many more haven't been interviewed?
kokororyu 4 years ago
controled media shull!!! this guy is whorin out a book..Why didnt he tells us about where was all the dead bodies that were missing!!!Plus I don't recall seeing any plane engines within that rubble..If it was a plane then release the over 50 video footage caught by the highway camera and the video from the gas station and hotel?? USA 2 day gatekeep please explain that 2 me..OR maybe investage it!!!That will never happen cuz this guy is bought and paid 4!!!!
akacypress 4 years ago
Ok Mike, where the hell are the dam wings? Engines? Anything? "They folded back..." and what? Finish your thought you're the journalist. No one thinks the wings should go in. I dont need a physics lesson from a story reteller. How about a mark, a scratch? Broken window next to the hole? No? Show us the goods. Show us the other footage. You're the journalist go get it for us. While you're at it bring us that big tarp covered container that they carted off too.
ayebretwalda 4 years ago
Ok Mike, now give us the facts on the Twin Towers -WT7 - Flight 93?
kevgrim 4 years ago
*sign*
m4dn3ss 4 years ago
I'm not a ballistics expert but I certainly don't like the folding wings theory he proposes. at 800km/h they don't fold anywhere. I'd say that if he claims to have seen that he's lying
DanFrederiksen 4 years ago
It's not a theory you tard, it's his description of what he saw... Right or wrong to reality, it is his and you can't argue that.
Loosen up that Tin Hat and start listening and have some critical thinking skills would you?
kokororyu 4 years ago
It was not a 757 because a 757 could not fly the flight path on record. It had to be a plane capable of the G forces exerted in the nose dive and turn, and then even so, no inexperienced pilot could do it as well. It was almost certainly a plane that RESEMBLED a large commercial jet, but at this speed, and if it had false markings, no news reporter would know what he saw. An A3 Skywarrior military bomber contolled by a QRS11 gyrochip could do this. A 757? Absolutely impossible.
neilslade 4 years ago
Too bad what you are saying is incorrect. The majority of airline pilots agree that not only was the Pentagon flight possible, but it could've been done by an amateur as well.
MarkyX 4 years ago
What sample of your "majority" are you talking about? let me guess the pilots for truth.
How come when some dutch guys took a similar novice pilot and placed him in a professional simulator to train pilots to fly such aircraft it became quite apparent it was VERY POSSIBLE. The guy did it 3 out of 3 times!
BTW, .5 g's is all that decline and turn places on the aircraft. wow... and to thing its designed for well over 2!
watch?v=Ts9lSnghLgA
kokororyu 4 years ago
Isn't it sad that a person corrects misquotes, tries to stop the real spin by CTers, and his rating is low and no one hardly views his video. It just proves how CTers are mob mentality and don't fact check. Otherwise they would be buzzing around this video discussing the validity of it... but no... the troothers are actually tin hatters...
kokororyu 4 years ago
Mark Faram, writer Navy Times [made controversial American Airlines wreckage photo]:
"That was the only piece of wreckage of any size that I saw, but was by no means the only piece. As I stepped onto the highway next to the triage area, I knelt down to tie my shoe and all over the highway were small pieces of aircraft skin, none bigger than a half-dollar."
kokororyu 4 years ago
Will Jarvis, Pentagon employee 300 meters from the impact:
"There was just nothing left. It was incinerated. We couldn't see a tail or a wing or anything... Then I saw little bits of silver falling from the sky."
kokororyu 4 years ago
Captain Defina and airport Battalion Chief Walter Hood:
"The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear. The devastation was horrific."
kokororyu 4 years ago
Don Fortunato, detective who arrived a few minutes after the impact on the scene:
"Traffic was at a standstill, so I parked on the shoulder, not far from the scene and ran to the site. Next to me was a cab from D.C., its windshield smashed out by pieces of lampposts. There were pieces of the plane all over the highway, pieces of wing, I think..."
kokororyu 4 years ago
Lon Rains, Editor Space News, on Interstate 395:
"I remember vividly that as I turned off my cell phone I was watching the almost serene image of thick pieces of flaming fiberglass insulation floating down onto the highway."
kokororyu 4 years ago
Mark Faram, writer Navy Times [made controversial American Airlines wreckage photo]:
"That was the only piece of wreckage of any size that I saw, but was by no means the only piece. As I stepped onto the highway next to the triage area, I knelt down to tie my shoe and all over the highway were small pieces of aircraft skin, none bigger than a half-dollar.
kokororyu 4 years ago