8800 ultras in sli will perform faster than a 4850x2. Price is the issue though and even today they still fetch a premium on ebay. It says alot about the 8 series and it says even more about how consoles have held back game development.
@greyfoxzero Yeah, but 8xxx series is so glitchy on games. L4D2 would crash out of nowhere, Project IGI didn't display correctly, (it looked like the image was put into a blender) and the drivers I got from NVIDIA constantly Blue Screened my PC. Even after uninstalling the drivers and putting in a different card I still get Blue Screens from that card and its drivers. However, cards like the 7900GTX ftw still and I like their GTX 590's.
we arent talking about the 295. we are talking about the 8800 GTX. Anyway the 295 is an Nvidia and in my opinion, based on my experience, Nvidia kinda sux.
Nvidia sux cuz they burn out and are over priced. I only had one ATI card burn out on me and it was my fault. I must have gone through 6 Nvidia cards in the 8 yrs Ive been building computers. Quoting the Dark Night is pretty lame dude.
how are they more powerfull if they are not more powerfull,its the same shit anyways,when you don't buy them just as they appear you look at price and performance so whatever
You actually payed for an HD4850X2? You must REALLY be stupid. You could have gotten 2 HD4850 1GB and of had $100 left over. The HD4850X2 is $300. You could have gotten a GTX280 or GTX285 and still of had 20 or so bucks left over.
And if you like ATI so much, you could have gotten TWO HD4870 and Crossfire them for...10 or 15$ more.
HD4850X2 is ATI's biggest fail besides the 2xxx series.
nah I didnt pay $300 for the card. I got it for $200. Its a 2 GB series and it is faster than a GTX 285 or 280 plus cheaper. I dont have dual PCIe slots on my motherboard so crossfiring 2 cards was not an option. Also, at the time this card was cheaper than 2 HD4870s. not sure what prices are. Also, the 4850x2 is not ATI's biggest fail. If anyone is stupid, it would have to be you. Only idiots accuse people of being stupid before knowing the facts. Idiot Nvidia fanboy
Yes, i'm an nVidia fan boy. Yet the only card I even owned from them was an MX440 when I was too young to even remember what the card was really like. I've owned the X800 XT PE, the X1950XTX and the HD4850 I own now. So I don't know where you got nVidia fanboy from. And there is no way the HD4850x2 is faster then the GTX285 or GTX280. So good day.
it actually is faster. But its two HD4850s built into one card vs. a single GTX280 or 285 so it has an unfair advantage. Also the 4870 x2 is only 5 fps faster than the 4850x2.
ATi cards have more compute performance, there architecture is mainly build for CAD work, rendering as such, they are cheaper to make than Nvidia cards and also more powerful for the price, BUT, because of how they are designed, they do not perform as good as the nvidia cards, but still they always have the latest technology, like GDDR5, 55nm 40nm and the list goes on.
Nvidia probably made fatser GTX 280s and 285s by now, I last posted half a year ago. Back then the 4850x2 WAS faster. If you dont believe me read some actual tests not some made up BS. I would also like u to please explain to me why this card sux and also, if the card actually does "sux hard", then why have I been able to play every game I throw at it at max settings?
It's an awesome card, but honestly, this moron is comparing a 2 or 3 year old card to way newer generation cards. Of course you don't go and buy an 8800 Ultra or GTX now, but back in the days, these were the shit, and they can still pull their own weight today.
Isnt it sad how the newer technology that runs my 4850x2 is not only cheaper but also more affective than that of the old 8800? I paid only a fraction of the price of a 8800 Ultra or GTX 3 yrs ago and the power is far beyond the 8800's capabilities. That was the point I was trying to make with my first post, but the conversation quickly changed. Does it make me a moron? no it doesnt. Does it make u look bitter? yes it does
@Peemon what card should i get that can run most games in high or eaven very high and isnt to expensive. I had a 8800gtx but it broke, so i need a new card and i dont have alot of money. tkx...
lol, i forgot the 295 had 2X280 video cards. my bad. i don't know why you would need to have that much power though. is there any reason to get a 295 besides bragging rights, being able to run crysis at very fast speeds and using it for a huge monitor?
outdated? they were made last year! 2x 9800gtx+ would be much better for price; realistically who buys 295 that aren't completly obsesed with graphics? the 2 9800gtx+ would be just as good as the 295 in lower resolutions.
i agree fully, but no one knows what tech they will come out with in '10. I just think that the 295 is way to much to be spending one just one thing that will be outdated in a year or so. I agree the 295 might future proof your system, but no one knows how good games will run on it in '10. I just content using my two 9800GTX+ in SLI, if I have to upgrade, I can just buy two more just as easily as I bought my last two.
I did i bought 3 ultras for 155$ each in triple sli they out perform the 9800 gtx in triple sli and the 260 in sli
the 280 and 280 and 4870 x2 is faster but not cheaper.
all that "8800 sli is not as good as the 9000 series" is rumor bullshit. in fact even nvidia admits that the 8800 series can out perform 9600 and 9800 series.
actually and interview with an nvidia representative given in a march 09 maximum pc states that the 295 is 2x 260's and in quad sli is like having 4x 260's
also the 280 and 285 in 3xsli easily beats the 295 in quad sli
even the 3x8800 ultras i bought on ebay cheap can keep pace with quad 260's
i have the BFG version to the 9800gtx+ OC do it job very well looking to get anothwer in sli so will save abit for that get that and then bench crysis and some 3d modelling software as that wat i use my rig for 3d modelling, photoshop edit and gaming
Their isn't much point of spending so much money back then on an Ultra when it costed few hundred bucks more than the GTX where the Ultra is like a tad better. Where using the SAME EXACT Core, basic differences were the clocks. Only a bit optimized on the Ultra, the GTX was the monster. With that extra money, could have bought better ram, psu, cpu, hd, bigger monitor etc. But those two are gone now. They still can compete but gtx280 (the video card that was said to get a tflop) and the 4870
i disagree the 8800 gtz oc 1 and 2 r just a tiny bit slower than the ultra an u do not notice it on dx 10 games ur not t=running direct 10 on the first screen u ultra lover lol
the winner on this video is the 9800 GX2 but my SLI BFG 8800 GTS 640 OC with Amd 6000+x2 and 4GB OCZ2 can get an average of 39 FPS everything on very high and 1440x900 res
depending what your motherboard is, if its SLI capable then i would get another 8800gt, but since uv got a big monitor id say get an ultra or a overclocked gtx for higher resolutions, the memory comes in handy at higher res
No it doesn't. The 9800GTX only has a 256 bit memory interface, and only has around a 40GB/sec bandwidth on it with 512MB RAM.
The 8800GTX and Ultra have a 384 bit memory interface and 768MB RAM, which means the 8800GTX and Ultra are better and can handle higher resolutions much better.
A 9800GTX is just an 8800GTS 512, but with a 2nd SLI slot on it.
At the lower resolutions you probably will yea, like my 8800GTS 512 can give better performance than a GTX below 1680x1050, but when you get to the higher resolutions, the 8800GTX and Ultra are faster because of their memory interface size and amount of RAM.
might be, but if you want a card that can run crysis, and more at 1680x1050 and you want a card with good bang-per-buck ratio, i'd say the 9800GTX wins...
There won't really be much of a difference between an 8800GTS 512 and 9800GTX at that resolution as they both have the same memory interface size and the same amount of RAM.
ur right. you can get overclocked gtx with modified cooling, and it will be as fast as ultra. ultra is a toy for the rich.. and the way to make nvidia rich xD
i cant tell the big difference except for the performance. The Ultraxxx ran the shizzle a bit smoother, easiest to notice when the cam is in the tunnel with the cars. Also the snow looks more realistic (first scene) it isnt as blueish-dark as the GTX.
The gtx is very close to the ultra- i overclocked mine (i have 2) to 800mhz per core and 2.4ghz RAM- I had to max the fans so it sounds like the inside of a jet engine, but the speed it amazing. I got an average of 60fps with everything max in 1080p high def.
wich one is better ?
crackkn 3 months ago
WOWW big difference
gusnhde93 1 year ago
why does this card still cost between $500 and $1200?!
GT5Enthusiast 1 year ago
@GT5Enthusiast naaaah 150 on ebay, realy rare
arni291 1 year ago
8800 ultras in sli will perform faster than a 4850x2. Price is the issue though and even today they still fetch a premium on ebay. It says alot about the 8 series and it says even more about how consoles have held back game development.
greyfoxzero 1 year ago
@greyfoxzero Yeah, but 8xxx series is so glitchy on games. L4D2 would crash out of nowhere, Project IGI didn't display correctly, (it looked like the image was put into a blender) and the drivers I got from NVIDIA constantly Blue Screened my PC. Even after uninstalling the drivers and putting in a different card I still get Blue Screens from that card and its drivers. However, cards like the 7900GTX ftw still and I like their GTX 590's.
NateTheGreatSays 4 months ago
I still have a 8800GTX, and I can run most recent games on high, even some of them with A.A.
overclockeador 1 year ago
lol from that distance i cant see the difference
zacanema 2 years ago
Gtx 285 Sli pownz Gtx 295
But GTX 295 pownz everthing that is not sli
fOxkex 2 years ago
Its sli
tiagom135 2 years ago
GTX 295 has an internal SLI bridge, and has 2 chips on it's PCB. So technically, it's SLI itself.
Peemon 2 years ago 14
it was 2 pcb's
tiagom135 1 year ago
haha I remember when the 8800 GTX was the Jesus GPU. Now my HD4850X2 2GB kicks the hell out of it, so does my bros HD4850 512 for that matter.
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
gtx 295 pwns HD4850X2
dubmywub 2 years ago
we arent talking about the 295. we are talking about the 8800 GTX. Anyway the 295 is an Nvidia and in my opinion, based on my experience, Nvidia kinda sux.
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
Y so serious?
ati suck they aint even got physx which makes all games 100 x better
dubmywub 2 years ago
Nvidia sux cuz they burn out and are over priced. I only had one ATI card burn out on me and it was my fault. I must have gone through 6 Nvidia cards in the 8 yrs Ive been building computers. Quoting the Dark Night is pretty lame dude.
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
lol i wernt quoting the dark night ur being realy serious about something thats not
i ve had 5 nvidia cards and each one has been fine
and much more powerful
dubmywub 2 years ago
ATi cards are much more powerfull than people think
sgtheadhole 2 years ago
how are they more powerfull if they are not more powerfull,its the same shit anyways,when you don't buy them just as they appear you look at price and performance so whatever
drinkbudyXD 2 years ago
Ah the good ole 8xxx series, the flag ship of Nvidia.
Its still a good card, but the 8xxx series is about 5-20% slower than the 9xxx series. Aging like the 7xxx did.
Xelvielll 2 years ago
You actually payed for an HD4850X2? You must REALLY be stupid. You could have gotten 2 HD4850 1GB and of had $100 left over. The HD4850X2 is $300. You could have gotten a GTX280 or GTX285 and still of had 20 or so bucks left over.
And if you like ATI so much, you could have gotten TWO HD4870 and Crossfire them for...10 or 15$ more.
HD4850X2 is ATI's biggest fail besides the 2xxx series.
LVGshultz 2 years ago
nah I didnt pay $300 for the card. I got it for $200. Its a 2 GB series and it is faster than a GTX 285 or 280 plus cheaper. I dont have dual PCIe slots on my motherboard so crossfiring 2 cards was not an option. Also, at the time this card was cheaper than 2 HD4870s. not sure what prices are. Also, the 4850x2 is not ATI's biggest fail. If anyone is stupid, it would have to be you. Only idiots accuse people of being stupid before knowing the facts. Idiot Nvidia fanboy
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago 2
Yes, i'm an nVidia fan boy. Yet the only card I even owned from them was an MX440 when I was too young to even remember what the card was really like. I've owned the X800 XT PE, the X1950XTX and the HD4850 I own now. So I don't know where you got nVidia fanboy from. And there is no way the HD4850x2 is faster then the GTX285 or GTX280. So good day.
LVGshultz 2 years ago
it actually is faster. But its two HD4850s built into one card vs. a single GTX280 or 285 so it has an unfair advantage. Also the 4870 x2 is only 5 fps faster than the 4850x2.
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago 2
ATi cards have more compute performance, there architecture is mainly build for CAD work, rendering as such, they are cheaper to make than Nvidia cards and also more powerful for the price, BUT, because of how they are designed, they do not perform as good as the nvidia cards, but still they always have the latest technology, like GDDR5, 55nm 40nm and the list goes on.
sgtheadhole 2 years ago 2
2 GB card at $200 which one and can it run crysis on very high
mbsfaridi 2 years ago
no its not xDDD not at all . its actually sux hard. i was thinking about that card, then i saw tests and lost interest in it.
4g3r4g3 2 years ago
Nvidia probably made fatser GTX 280s and 285s by now, I last posted half a year ago. Back then the 4850x2 WAS faster. If you dont believe me read some actual tests not some made up BS. I would also like u to please explain to me why this card sux and also, if the card actually does "sux hard", then why have I been able to play every game I throw at it at max settings?
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
It's an awesome card, but honestly, this moron is comparing a 2 or 3 year old card to way newer generation cards. Of course you don't go and buy an 8800 Ultra or GTX now, but back in the days, these were the shit, and they can still pull their own weight today.
Peemon 2 years ago
Isnt it sad how the newer technology that runs my 4850x2 is not only cheaper but also more affective than that of the old 8800? I paid only a fraction of the price of a 8800 Ultra or GTX 3 yrs ago and the power is far beyond the 8800's capabilities. That was the point I was trying to make with my first post, but the conversation quickly changed. Does it make me a moron? no it doesnt. Does it make u look bitter? yes it does
LordSamuelJ 2 years ago
@Peemon what card should i get that can run most games in high or eaven very high and isnt to expensive. I had a 8800gtx but it broke, so i need a new card and i dont have alot of money. tkx...
AJsfree2toke 2 years ago
KK thanx but now iam even more stuck for Xmas a 3870x2 or a 4870 on crysis the 3870x2 has more FPS
JoeLadleyYE 3 years ago
wats better da ATI 4870 or XFX 8800 Ultra? Need to know!!!
JoeLadleyYE 3 years ago
4870 would own the ultra, plus i dont think u can buy a ultra anymore unless its used off ebay
mayers000 3 years ago
you can buy them from amazon and many places brannew ;)
raikkonen85 3 years ago
well..congrats about it
LiamPearlDrumsInsane 3 years ago
im getting 8800gtx in sli =]
feverofhell2 3 years ago
i got a 4870 =]
LiamPearlDrumsInsane 3 years ago
ive got gtx 260 sli =]
bryand1989 3 years ago
congrats but with those money you shouldve got gtx280 :P
LiamPearlDrumsInsane 3 years ago
hd4870x2 :D
nivrin13 3 years ago
I've got a single 8600GT (lol)
Chandlermaki 3 years ago
LOL
nivrin13 3 years ago
I'm getting a single 4870 soon, ordered a few days ago.
Chandlermaki 3 years ago
i had one about 2 months ago..but upgraded XD
LiamPearlDrumsInsane 3 years ago
gtx295 !!
deftones99999 3 years ago
good ;)
does it behave good?
nivrin13 3 years ago
i would consider getting two 9800gtx+ over the 295 because you are paying like 200-300 bucks more for the 295 than 2 gtx+'s.
mastershake2393 2 years ago
lol just because its GTX+?
your comparing like a HD4870 1GB with a GTX295
which means, the gtx295 is better in about 3 times
nivrin13 2 years ago
lol, i forgot the 295 had 2X280 video cards. my bad. i don't know why you would need to have that much power though. is there any reason to get a 295 besides bragging rights, being able to run crysis at very fast speeds and using it for a huge monitor?
mastershake2393 2 years ago
no
because nobody wastes money on outdated graphics to do sli
nivrin13 2 years ago
what do you mean by that?
mastershake2393 2 years ago
i wouldnt spend like 400€ just to do sli with two outdated graphic cards
with 450€ you can get a 3 or 4 times better card
thats just it
nivrin13 2 years ago
outdated? they were made last year! 2x 9800gtx+ would be much better for price; realistically who buys 295 that aren't completly obsesed with graphics? the 2 9800gtx+ would be just as good as the 295 in lower resolutions.
mastershake2393 2 years ago
yes in lower resolutions your right
but!
but the 9800GTX+ will only last a year running games
in 2010 i bet with you that 9800 wont be able to run most of the games
GTX295 will still run something
not at full potential but something
if we were on 2004 maybe the card would last longer
but with the current knowledge of designing and stuff
you never know
nivrin13 2 years ago
i agree fully, but no one knows what tech they will come out with in '10. I just think that the 295 is way to much to be spending one just one thing that will be outdated in a year or so. I agree the 295 might future proof your system, but no one knows how good games will run on it in '10. I just content using my two 9800GTX+ in SLI, if I have to upgrade, I can just buy two more just as easily as I bought my last two.
mastershake2393 2 years ago
ok
its your choice ;)
nivrin13 2 years ago
show this 2 video cards to see who is best
HereToKillYou 2 years ago
I did i bought 3 ultras for 155$ each in triple sli they out perform the 9800 gtx in triple sli and the 260 in sli
the 280 and 280 and 4870 x2 is faster but not cheaper.
all that "8800 sli is not as good as the 9000 series" is rumor bullshit. in fact even nvidia admits that the 8800 series can out perform 9600 and 9800 series.
godscuttingyoudown 2 years ago
still a waste of money
nivrin13 2 years ago
rofl you asshole, its not 2x280 video cards, if it was, the 295 would have itselfs spec doubled. Some people want high power, asshole
k001k1dzm4n14 2 years ago
check any respectable computer hardware site; they will say that the gtx 295 has 2 lower power 280's in it. fuck off, you don't know anything.
mastershake2393 2 years ago 2
actually and interview with an nvidia representative given in a march 09 maximum pc states that the 295 is 2x 260's and in quad sli is like having 4x 260's
also the 280 and 285 in 3xsli easily beats the 295 in quad sli
even the 3x8800 ultras i bought on ebay cheap can keep pace with quad 260's
the 285 in 3 triple sli is the fastest solution
godscuttingyoudown 2 years ago
i got an 8800gts single :) (works great though)
kapowwebuyer 3 years ago
shut up
AverageCabbage 3 years ago
Hmm
would the 8800 GTX bottleneck on an amd duel core 4400+? (im thinking about upgrading from 7900 gs)
im gonna upgrade anyway, just wondering how far i can go before a bottleneck
Thanks in advance
tinymouse2 3 years ago
i got XFX 9800 GTX+ It ownz ;D
puurube 3 years ago 3
i have the BFG version to the 9800gtx+ OC do it job very well looking to get anothwer in sli so will save abit for that get that and then bench crysis and some 3d modelling software as that wat i use my rig for 3d modelling, photoshop edit and gaming
DboyDaspecial 3 years ago
What point installing XP, you can select what DX anyway, or even just turn the graphics down.
slaterking1000 3 years ago
the frame rate on the ultra is almost 100% higher thats insane. Never would've guessed. N Now i got Ultra SLi Winner!!!
youjutsusha 3 years ago
Their isn't much point of spending so much money back then on an Ultra when it costed few hundred bucks more than the GTX where the Ultra is like a tad better. Where using the SAME EXACT Core, basic differences were the clocks. Only a bit optimized on the Ultra, the GTX was the monster. With that extra money, could have bought better ram, psu, cpu, hd, bigger monitor etc. But those two are gone now. They still can compete but gtx280 (the video card that was said to get a tflop) and the 4870
mythtype 3 years ago
i disagree the 8800 gtz oc 1 and 2 r just a tiny bit slower than the ultra an u do not notice it on dx 10 games ur not t=running direct 10 on the first screen u ultra lover lol
nickfighter28 3 years ago
is 8800gtx running on directx10?
cyther39 3 years ago
isn't it more fair to compair it to a 8800 gtx xxx then if u use a xxx ultra
idmasterl 3 years ago
The utra's better :D
nozic11111 3 years ago 10
ever heard of a standard?
phantomfireNL 3 years ago
the gtx looks better
Suspect114 3 years ago
Can 8800gtx support directx9?
ThrashMan91 3 years ago
yes
XclusiveFilms08 3 years ago
Bitche
issam619 3 years ago
8800 Ultra are faster !
Trusten1984 3 years ago
the winner on this video is the 9800 GX2 but my SLI BFG 8800 GTS 640 OC with Amd 6000+x2 and 4GB OCZ2 can get an average of 39 FPS everything on very high and 1440x900 res
Xonder23 3 years ago
the winner 9800 GX2
Xonder23 3 years ago
wow, i had no idea there was such a performance gap between the GTX and the Ultra..there's like a 15 FPS difference.
manofpopsicle516 3 years ago
so is ultra better than gtx?
whitefoxx52 3 years ago
of course
oOcRaNkOo 3 years ago
could an ati 4870 run DIRT at ultra high settings at 1680x1050?
dewi20 3 years ago
Not Ultra high i think but high with xAA
jakanddaxterlover15 3 years ago
yep 60fps avg
Taho11111 3 years ago
at ultra settings? would it lag with other cars on the screen?
dewi20 3 years ago
ummmm i got my PC at christmas and this is it :
AMD athlon 64x2 dual core processor 6400+,
2.0GB ram,
NIVIDA Geforce 8600 GT.
is this oke and what should i get now as in like a new grahics card or what? o and i just got my 26"" HD moniter yesterday =)
magicaljake4 3 years ago
depending what your motherboard is, if its SLI capable then i would get another 8800gt, but since uv got a big monitor id say get an ultra or a overclocked gtx for higher resolutions, the memory comes in handy at higher res
rockit91 3 years ago
Is this 8800gtx stock? I guess mine would be between those two. I have a 8800gtx xxx.
filipetolhuizen 3 years ago
uhh, quad core and 8800 ultra... with 2gb of RAM... Anyone smell a bottleneck?
deathfromanal 3 years ago
No, he has very fast RAM and 4GB makes hardly any difference.
JackdotTaylor 3 years ago
Why the fuck would that bottleneck...
LukeXgamer 3 years ago
why nobody talks about fill rate power?
8800gt--33 millon texels per second
9600gt--20 millon-- big difference
8800 seems a better buy,now 9600 uses newer technology,but raw power wise the 8800 wins.
Now the 9800 does 70 millon but it´s too expensive.
endrizo 3 years ago
This is cool, thanks for this!
stevecork 3 years ago
Call of juarez, SUCKS, soory to say that, and for my opinio the ultra wins for shure.
taste4love 3 years ago
Woah...It's driving me insane....Is your pc that noise in the Background?o0
Is it the Graphics Card?o0
POkegreis 3 years ago
can i run 1 of these cards on my extreme striker 680i sli motherboard
fym125 3 years ago
depends on what the watts and amps on your psu is
gamer011010 3 years ago
now 2 9800 gx2 and tell us what you think on vista ultimate and your know in my world
watchtowerstudios 3 years ago
well u shudnt b/c u cant see the true performance of the cards to many light effects in the lens
agentx250 3 years ago
u shud of just overclocked the gtx and its as good as the ultra. and u cant do reviews like this recording with a camera
agentx250 3 years ago
Yes he can. He just did.
It's to show that it isn't fake.
JaceGG 3 years ago
one of the screens is curvy
quaserti 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're taking a camera video feed of your computer? My God, you are a HUGE gigantic faggot.
Nebetsu 3 years ago
your moms a fagot too.
procpuarie 3 years ago
8800 Ultra wins
Maarten007 3 years ago
but which wins 8800 ultra or 9800gtx?
noobc4k3 3 years ago
9800 gtx cooks! 10%-20% faster than 8800 ultra.
(Im talking about, the XFX 9800GTX Black Edition)
dkz0sk8ter 3 years ago
But ultra costs like 2,5 times as much as 9800gtx in my country
noobc4k3 3 years ago 2
yep SICK :S
dkz0sk8ter 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the 9800gtx wins
robotmafia000 3 years ago
No it doesn't.
Everlong16 3 years ago
9800gx2 is out of this.
robotmafia000 3 years ago
The 9800GTX wins over the 8800GTX and the 8800 Ultra, but not the 9800GX2
LooperNor 3 years ago
No it doesn't. The 9800GTX only has a 256 bit memory interface, and only has around a 40GB/sec bandwidth on it with 512MB RAM.
The 8800GTX and Ultra have a 384 bit memory interface and 768MB RAM, which means the 8800GTX and Ultra are better and can handle higher resolutions much better.
A 9800GTX is just an 8800GTS 512, but with a 2nd SLI slot on it.
Everlong16 3 years ago 3
You don't know how wrong you are...
the 9800GTX got around 70GB/sec bandwith...
LooperNor 3 years ago
I was looking at the stock speeds on the Nvidia website.
But then maybe you should be quiet, when the 8800GTX has a stock bandwidth of 84GB/s and the 8800 Ultra 103GB/s
Everlong16 3 years ago 2
specs ain't all...
Manufacturing process got a bit to say also...
And if you stick two 9800GTX's in your system, you get ALOT better performance then both two 8800GTX's and one 8800 Ultra for alot less money...
LooperNor 3 years ago
At the lower resolutions you probably will yea, like my 8800GTS 512 can give better performance than a GTX below 1680x1050, but when you get to the higher resolutions, the 8800GTX and Ultra are faster because of their memory interface size and amount of RAM.
Everlong16 3 years ago
You normally don't play over 1680x1050 anyways.
And on a bang-per-buck ratio the 9800GTX owns both those cards, easily...
LooperNor 3 years ago
If you're bringing price in to it now, then the 8800GTS 512 wins.
Everlong16 3 years ago
might be, but if you want a card that can run crysis, and more at 1680x1050 and you want a card with good bang-per-buck ratio, i'd say the 9800GTX wins...
LooperNor 3 years ago
There won't really be much of a difference between an 8800GTS 512 and 9800GTX at that resolution as they both have the same memory interface size and the same amount of RAM.
Everlong16 3 years ago
9800GTX sucks.
LukeXgamer 3 years ago
dude i can't believe you just said that lol
DboyDaspecial 3 years ago
ya it's got lower FPS
CipherMind117 3 years ago
Are they the same monitor ... 8800 ultra wins, right?
Ilissill 3 years ago
gtx is better for the price IMO, ultra is just an overclocked gtx
artem1002 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ultra is gay. gt is allsome!!!!:)
crazypunk0 3 years ago
ur right. you can get overclocked gtx with modified cooling, and it will be as fast as ultra. ultra is a toy for the rich.. and the way to make nvidia rich xD
sergi5122 3 years ago
u wish
NorwayGamer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why the fuck arnt you playing the game stop doing fucking gay benchmarks
crazypunk0 3 years ago
"Your'e gay."
QFT
thebigboobie 3 years ago
geforce ultra FTW
rozzalenda123 3 years ago 2
god I was just being sarcastic so dont get your panties in a bunch ok
FragUPlenty 3 years ago
same shit
umjetnaplavusa99 3 years ago
Hey. You sound South African with that aaccent. Am I right? Or Newzealand. Probably Newzeland
Domzdream 3 years ago
8800GTX is a good card:) its now much difference. REALLY? Have you friends?
sefroiz 3 years ago
i cant tell the big difference except for the performance. The Ultraxxx ran the shizzle a bit smoother, easiest to notice when the cam is in the tunnel with the cars. Also the snow looks more realistic (first scene) it isnt as blueish-dark as the GTX.
Rookie220291 3 years ago
its hard to tell the difference because of crappy youtube resolution
flickflame 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cmon my 7300gt will pwn that
FragUPlenty 3 years ago
hahahahahahaha thanks for the good laugh (really, i'm not trying to burn)
venom55520 3 years ago 2
are u like....a cOMPLETE MORON?!?!
artem1002 3 years ago 5
dude your an idiot
Rico0399 3 years ago
the one on the right looked a bit green
einfang 3 years ago 2
haha, xxx. porn!
DreadRaptor85 3 years ago 3
WAIT A FUCKING MINUT!
You can get Lost Planet on computer? o.O
domrulez8 3 years ago 2
yup lol
airsofter18889 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
lol your stupid :D not to know that youre not a gamer but a loser
Cobac 3 years ago
How rude. Do you have any friends?
Born2killx 3 years ago 9
why dont you shut the fuck up?
mackiethe1for 3 years ago
why dont you try windows xp direct x10. god dam. i use dx10 all the time on my xp. runs like a dream.
Flyinghotpocket 3 years ago 2
u rich bastard
Ratilis 3 years ago 6
i cant see anything... 8800gt life! lol
hanieyf 3 years ago
Aussie accent!
ronslimhelu 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
quad core really sucks man
darkhunter93 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
asian
lik my balls
fag
12ESKEIMI 3 years ago
No life?
Decenium 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you too lik my balls
and the bullshit of no life
why you have to repeat
what people say
come up with your wond words
stupid fag
12ESKEIMI 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No life at all...>_>
dagisto1987 3 years ago
"WOND"? lol
KayDawg16 3 years ago
stfu ,i was typing fast bitch
dont trip fag
12ESKEIMI 3 years ago
rofl, angry kid
KayDawg16 3 years ago 2
go to hell fag
12ESKEIMI 3 years ago
I got a XFX 8800 GTS xxx
mmccab13 3 years ago 2
if u really wanna push the cards to the boiling point, try it on crysis XD but the ultra really makes the diff
zaks6 3 years ago
The gtx is very close to the ultra- i overclocked mine (i have 2) to 800mhz per core and 2.4ghz RAM- I had to max the fans so it sounds like the inside of a jet engine, but the speed it amazing. I got an average of 60fps with everything max in 1080p high def.
pwnagizer1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your computer sucks stupid noob! garbage computer! sell it on ebay for 2 dollars noob!
jollibee 3 years ago
jollibee is an idiot.kumain ka na lang ng kwek kwek tungak bastos kang puke ka!
fretduster03 3 years ago
i get over 100 fps with my gtx card with dx10
goksnedeh6578 3 years ago
ok.......
which one did win ? ITS FREAKIN THE SAME!
killera 3 years ago
wtf, look at the fps on the left, then on the right
cVlman 3 years ago
OOOOOW yaaa xD
ok now i see it ^^
killera 3 years ago
lol
cVlman 3 years ago
but this guy has 3 ultras thats like 2 3870 X2 so maxishine your system owns i wish i could get the money for that pc dude IT OWNS :D
MaSt3rPi3cE 3 years ago
3870 x2 is beter then ultra :P
Hashgodzila 3 years ago