IT’S FRIGHTENING FOR THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW THE TRUTH.. WWIII, EARTHQUAKES –MAYBE MEGA EARTHQUAKE AND GREAT TRIBULATION ARE ALREADY AT THE DOOR AND SO IS THE –RAPTURE (1THESSALONIANS 4:17) --ONLY THE HOLY ONES WILL SEE THE KINGDOM OF GOD.REPENT!READ REVELATIONS IN THE BIBLE.SIGNS OF JESUS COMING:DAMASCUS,SYRIA(ISAIAH 17:1),EGYPT(ISAIAH 19:1),ISRAEL-DIVIDED(JOEL 3:1-2),WARS(EZEKIEL 38-39 AND PSALMS 83),EARTHQUAKES(MATTHEW 24:1-14),JONAH'S SIGN(MATTHEW 12:38-45).GET IN THE ARK NOW!JESUS IS COMING!
when a rocket lifts how does it land? how do they come back to earth?? do they dand in the same place? how because when they get to space they release their rockets
@abongnelah i think they use some weird pod with a big ass parachute. And i also think they land in the ocean and just tell their coordinates and they'll find them.
@CmdShepard or whoever claims fake video: at least you have to show your talent beyond doubt that you qualify to make such a statement, otherwise it is easy to HIDE behind a computer screen and BS around like a retarded child
@Runescape8747 We love you Aussies! My late brother-in-law was an Aussie. A good man and a great pilot! I flew in some interesting airplanes with him, talked a lot about aerospace technology stuff, and learned a lot (including some good nasty jokes in the Australian tradition!) You guys are great -- even more "American" than we are: good-natured with a healthy dose of rebelliousness and a can-do attitude. Space exploration is for everybody, especially people like that!
no. Not a Fake. This video went public also here in a scientific series of documentation concerning spaceflight . The physics happening here is way to real. Secondly it is an easy task to mount a cam onto a space vehicle sending pictures like this for documenting the flight after liftoff. See the icing of the vehicle while going supersonic after having passed the lower troposphere, see it drying and freezing/falling off in higher atmosphere because of very low pressure and shock after separ.
NASA's booster motors tend to fall into the Indian ocean, where special crews go out and retrieve them, it actually boosts the economy of whatever country these things fall into, creating jobs and whatnot
@FilmComposeRaHoppe No - usually the launch is designed in a way that the boosters fall in the ocean and sometimes their are reusable boosters so they are landed in water with the help of parachutes to have minimal damage.
@FilmComposeRaHoppe no not any chance it would hit somebody because those engines will just land in far away open sea where nobody goes then they will have people go and look for them in the ocean. that's how that works. your welcome.
@KLRider the reason why you are not able to see stars is cause the stars are not bright enough for the camera. You can try it. MAke a photo at night. I dont think that you´ll see something except the moon. Only 20.000 $ cameras are able to do it. ;-)
@folk658 nasa gets less then 0.5% of the defence budget... the fucking US navy gets 200 billion a year, and the US Navy is already larger then the next 13 largest navys in the world put together, and 11 of these navys are allied with US... so give half that money to nasa and quit being fucking morons... space exploration is the most important thing humanity could ever do, yet they get 0.0001% of your tax dollar
Yeah this is an actual video, I was flying the rocket that day,I used to fly these babys all the time but I transitioned into the Flying Saucer Squadron out of Area 51.
This was great, we see spirit being lifted off to Mars looking down. Now question is : Why do they not have a cam on the probe looking ahead at Mars, giving us real live footage of the 6 month journey??It would be neat to see real live hi-def footage of the journey to, approaching, and landing on Mars. Seems beyond this ; all we get is a computer cartoon of the trip, and it's all the time on the shows they give us on channels like Discovery. Never the real journey???Until they land and rove??
@snlker I totally agree with you, I want cameras everywhere on those shuttles. How else can we learn and understand the whole process of space exploration. Filming more would make public interest grow and may even boost the funds that NASA get.
Its a great vid, my thanks to the uploader, whoever it was!
@snlker 99% of the journey you'll only see stars and nothing else, It's will also double or triple the weight of the spacecraft with batteries that it would need to transmit that long.
@michaeldim1 You're kidding? A camara would triple the weight of the spacecraft?I don't think so! Part of the journey may not be worth turning on the camara, but a good portion approaching Mars would be well worth filming as astronauts did the earth on the way back from the moon. No all we get is computer animation. Powering the camara?, there is plenty of solar power.Mars' orbit is only about 35 million more miles out. If they can look down, then why not foward? Foward seems better in this case
@snlker Yes, triple, if you want the camera running the whole way. Scientists have been spending years eliminating every extra gram of weight they don't need, so even a camera to capture the last week or so of approach will easily consume the weight budget. Now, I understand the footage you want to see, in which case an orbiting spacecraft, not a ground rover, will get you the footage you want. Orbiters are typically equipped with cameras and solar panels anyway.
@michaeldim1 how is a camara that heavy? Do you honestly believe they do not have a small forward looking cam on the vehicle that delivers the probe?Of coarse they do!for one,to see where they are going.The Viking probe was an orbiter and lander and had a cam? they had hi res cams in the 70's ,at least good enough beyond that fuzzy blk&wht garbage they give us.It make's no sense to send so many probes and not have at least one give us live hi-def APPROACHING footage of the last million miles :)
@snlker The cameras are on the probe, which is in the reentry capsule and cannot see. Also those cameras are solar powered, and with the panels stowed, they do not work. And finally, no, the probe does not need to see where it is going to reach Mars, and only use the camera after landing and extending the solar panels.
@michaeldim1 Well it does not need a cam to go to mars, but you cant tell me they do no put one on the outside so they can see their trip? out of all those probes/orbiters they sent? I have seen the blk& white footage approaching Mars and you could see the cloud bands and everything. It was only a few frames, but mars was at least 500,000 miles away still.All I'm saying is I can not see why not a single lengthy true color hi res shot of the real mars while they approach?It is not hard to do...
@snlker I find it plausible that there wasn't a camera. Taking shots might not be hard, but it would have to happen at a very busy time, and unless the camera was isolated from the rest of the rocket it'd add to Things That Could Go Wrong. Every bit of payload would also need more fuel for takeoff and deceleration, and hauling up that fuel would take more fuel, et cetera.
The biggest reason is that the Odyssey, Express, and Reconnaissance Orbiter probes are in Mars orbit, with great cameras.
@snlker But I'm speculating. This is the Internet Age, so you could always e-mail a NASA PR address and ask. They're publicly funded, so they're very active on the PR department. If you get an answer, please share it with us.
@snlker While I do disagree with the whole front-facing camera idea, as it would be too heavy, I don't see why they can't get incredibly high-res cameras on the rovers themselves. I've seen countless photos from the rovers and other orbiters, voyagers... Perhaps those were outdated, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think an 18 megapixel camera weighs much differently than a 3 megapixel one. Those rovers take cell phone quality at best considering the cost it took to put them there
You have to consider that these rovers were launched in 2003, build since 2000 and planned in the 90s. How good were cell phone cameras back then and how long would a cell phone operate in space and on the surface of mars?
@snlker Conspiracy nuts like you are just stupid. Plain stupid. You will never believe anything until someone shoots your ass up to Mars, right? Well I WISH they would. It would be the New World all over again, but this time on Mars. You know, America started as a colony of criminals, outcasts, scum that no one wants. We should do the same thing with Mars!
@hardstyle905 Your response is a typical response with just ridicule, and without an actual argument,... AHHH your brotha blows bubble gum !!! I just want to see looking forward , that's all, whats wrong with my question? If they have a cam looking down, then why not forward, or at least just a forward looking cam for the journey to see the planet get larger and larger as the probe approaches in live feed (of coarse a delay because of its distance from earth)Just a question based on observation.
@snlker Ask them. I don't know. I figure they don't want to have 20 cameras installed that look in all kinds of directions. When you get a reply please share it with us.
@hardstyle905 No one is asking for 20 cams. Just a forward looking cam ,or one the can have its angle changed so as to look in multiple directions , it is really not a hard thing to accomplish . . .
@snlker As far as I know, they don't have these cameras on the rockets to prove their flights are not faked, or to put it on Youtube, but rather for inspection if something goes wrong. The Columbia disaster in 2003 could have been prevented if they had had cameras. So these videos weren't really made for our amusement in the first place. But I could be wrong... I'm not disagreeing with you here tho. It WOULD be nice for sure.
@snlker Yes, a camera is too heavy. Even a small one. Every gram counts. It doesn't need a camera to know where it's going either, not even sensors. It's put on a carefully calculated trajectory that puts it right where it needs to go, basically they are shooting a bullet with a bullet, from a few million miles away.
Not to mention that that "live" feed would be delayed 10-20 minutes anyway.
@Helge129 bullshit. These rockets have payloads weighing several tons. Another camera doesn't matter.
10-20 minutes delay? Not really. There is such a thing called a "launch window". At the best time, Mars' distance to earth is only 80 million km. Radio waves travel at 300,000 km/s. It takes roughly 5 minutes to send a transmission from Mars to Earth. For video that's good enough. But when you're also controlling the rocket it gets difficult. That's why everything's automated.
@hardstyle905 Actually no, not bullshit. It's incredibly expensive to get even the smallest ammount of stuff into space. The distance between Mars and Earth varies from 'a few' million KM to over 150 million KM.
@Helge129 actually yes, bullshit again. Or is it not right that a space shuttle can carry up to 24 tons of payload? I don't know what kind of cameras they use in your country, but they're quite light weight here. A special "space camera" won't be much heavier either. About the distances, did you even read? I even overestimated it because the orbits are elliptical not circular. So the closest Earth-Mars distance is 55 million km. That makes 3 minutes travel time. So much for 10-20 min hahahahaha
@hardstyle905 You do realise that at the Farthest, Earth is actually well over 300 million (not 150 as I said before...my mistake) kilometers, where it takes light to get there almost, if not full 20 minutes.
@Helge129 Yes that is correct....and it wouldn't be very smart to launch a rocket to Mars when Mars is at its farthest point away! See my post -> "launch window". NASA don't shoot something up RANDOMLY. It's all carefully calculated.
At 1:30 the left jettison booster became a bit black on top, like if it was a bit burnt, is it because of the sun or speed, or is it just a shadow...?
I can't believe how quickly it accelerates, and how quickly the liquid on the outside of the rocket body freezes. You can see the curvature of the Earth and the receding ground within about 30 seconds of liftoff!
@tinkerbell6245 all the boosters and stages that fall to earth have parachutes and the launch is on a slight angle towards the ocean.. no citys were harmed in the making of this video
for everyone whos saying its "fake" are complete idiots im guessing your the same sorta people who believe in UFO's ( also known as low orbit satellites ) and if it makes a really bright light for 4 seconds its known as a satellite flare ( solar panels facing earth,,, another fact that its real is that i went to see the launch of Delta 2. :)
And now I'm wondering what is safer, the Space Shuttles that seem to be being used way beyond their designed ability; or these new Ares rockets, sitting on these millions of pounds of high explosives?
And now I'm wondering what is safer, the Space Shuttles that seem to be being used way beyond their designed ability; or these new Delta rockets, sitting on these millions of pounds of high explosives?
@91238673 LMAO. at 200 mph you can't even achieve orbit. Your ignorance is extraordinary. Just for your information, to achieve low earth orbit you need a velocity of 7.7 km/s, i.e. 17 THOUSAND mph. But that's not even near enough to leave Earth. The escape velocity is 11km/s or 24,600 mph and you'd need that to go to Mars.
why people ask wether it is fake or not ???? No questions! This is a real footage for tracking engineers to control when and what goes wrong in case of staging failures during launch e.g.
nice video, but people putting thier copyright and web page on this is stupid. This can be gotten from NASA and its not your creation or your property..
Awesome, the power of a rocket. Just incredible. Imagine that thing makes 2000 mph and more, but vertical. The fastest plane, the sr71 needs the best technology on earth to reach 2000 mph horizontal.
Within 10 seconds Delta was pitching over form the vertical so it was not going vertical. Notice how the ground changes due to the changing angle of the climb.........
It's not fake, watch al the billion other launches, for example the Falcon 1-RazakSat launch earlier this morning (June 14th) that was broadcasted live.
The lunar module had a thruster to leave the surface of the moon. The thruster didn't have to be very big and the module didn't have to be aerodynamic in the sub-, trans- and supersonic regions (different properties in each) and so on. This is because the moon has no dense atmosphere, aka no air resistance, and only about 1/6th of the earth's gravitational pull at SL.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
But it accelerates 5000 times faster. and some "bullets" in WW2 weighted 7 tonnes what makes their acceleration about 40 times more amazing then of the space ship )))))
This has been flagged as spam show
IT’S FRIGHTENING FOR THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW THE TRUTH.. WWIII, EARTHQUAKES –MAYBE MEGA EARTHQUAKE AND GREAT TRIBULATION ARE ALREADY AT THE DOOR AND SO IS THE –RAPTURE (1THESSALONIANS 4:17) --ONLY THE HOLY ONES WILL SEE THE KINGDOM OF GOD.REPENT!READ REVELATIONS IN THE BIBLE.SIGNS OF JESUS COMING:DAMASCUS,SYRIA(ISAIAH 17:1),EGYPT(ISAIAH 19:1),ISRAEL-DIVIDED(JOEL 3:1-2),WARS(EZEKIEL 38-39 AND PSALMS 83),EARTHQUAKES(MATTHEW 24:1-14),JONAH'S SIGN(MATTHEW 12:38-45).GET IN THE ARK NOW!JESUS IS COMING!
ENTERRAPTURE20 2 days ago
wtf had happened to boosters at 1:43? as if they just disappeared
W1nterNight 1 month ago
yes , its real becuse when the gas finished from this small thing they fall from the rocket
sadd909 1 month ago
andre go's today
nOObgamingnl 1 month ago
pilot: look ma no hands..!! i'm recording while driving.. LOL
kernelist1 1 month ago
1:34 looks like a really bad greenscreen job... i actually thought this looked fake b4 reading the comments... bit weird. It does look fake to me.
JamesGraysStudio 2 months ago
@JamesGraysStudio
I know About Green Screen or blue whatever, it looks weird because No atmos or no blue Sky and the sun is still there
escobarlevi 1 month ago
@JamesGraysStudio You kids need a fucking slap in the face. Everything is fake these days. Go outside a little more you stupid fuck.
hardstyle905 1 month ago
If it's fake,show me the proof that it is fake.
muffinchan2010 3 months ago
@muffinchan2010 Show me proof that you have a brain.
hardstyle905 1 month ago
Its a shame the Delta rocket reputation was tarnished by using strap on SRB's.
ti994apc 3 months ago
This is obviously real.Why would NASA fake a launch of the Spirit Mars Rover?
muffinchan2010 3 months ago
@muffinchan2010 FAKE!
CmdShepard 3 months ago
i can see my house!
anomimas01 3 months ago
when a rocket lifts how does it land? how do they come back to earth?? do they dand in the same place? how because when they get to space they release their rockets
abongnelah 3 months ago
@abongnelah i think they use some weird pod with a big ass parachute. And i also think they land in the ocean and just tell their coordinates and they'll find them.
paramarabo 3 months ago
@paramarabo ohhh thanks
abongnelah 3 months ago
We meet again 240p
archiestaffie666 3 months ago in playlist More videos from rgz500
FAKE!
CmdShepard 3 months ago
@CmdShepard or whoever claims fake video: at least you have to show your talent beyond doubt that you qualify to make such a statement, otherwise it is easy to HIDE behind a computer screen and BS around like a retarded child
Huantans 3 months ago
@Huantans FAKE! AND GAY!
CmdShepard 3 months ago
I have one of these in my backyard. HATE!
MotivatedSoccer18 4 months ago
fake
monkriddler 4 months ago
@monkriddler how is it fake?
coolguyinthe562 3 months ago
is it a phoenix's rocket?fly to the mars?
ilovegta1990 4 months ago
Even though im not an American (Australian) this sure make me proud!
Runescape8747 4 months ago
@Runescape8747 We love you Aussies! My late brother-in-law was an Aussie. A good man and a great pilot! I flew in some interesting airplanes with him, talked a lot about aerospace technology stuff, and learned a lot (including some good nasty jokes in the Australian tradition!) You guys are great -- even more "American" than we are: good-natured with a healthy dose of rebelliousness and a can-do attitude. Space exploration is for everybody, especially people like that!
888888username 3 months ago 2
no. Not a Fake. This video went public also here in a scientific series of documentation concerning spaceflight . The physics happening here is way to real. Secondly it is an easy task to mount a cam onto a space vehicle sending pictures like this for documenting the flight after liftoff. See the icing of the vehicle while going supersonic after having passed the lower troposphere, see it drying and freezing/falling off in higher atmosphere because of very low pressure and shock after separ.
berndpfe 4 months ago 5
@berndpfe I do not know who you are talking to, but I agree with what your saying. :)
xXDEICIDE216Xx 21 hours ago
NASA's booster motors tend to fall into the Indian ocean, where special crews go out and retrieve them, it actually boosts the economy of whatever country these things fall into, creating jobs and whatnot
dimesach 4 months ago
Nice little video clip, thanks for posting. And that's how you send a vehicle to Mars. Spirit and Opportunity certainly did a lovely job on Mars.
crusinscamp 5 months ago
Just a question. Is there a chance that one of the engines hit somebody on the ground?^^
FilmComposeRaHoppe 5 months ago
@FilmComposeRaHoppe No - usually the launch is designed in a way that the boosters fall in the ocean and sometimes their are reusable boosters so they are landed in water with the help of parachutes to have minimal damage.
strangerindanger 5 months ago
@FilmComposeRaHoppe no not any chance it would hit somebody because those engines will just land in far away open sea where nobody goes then they will have people go and look for them in the ocean. that's how that works. your welcome.
moontheloon518 4 months ago
@FilmComposeRaHoppe oh sorry i ddin't see that some had allready said this to you i'm sorry.
moontheloon518 4 months ago
how the stages seperated? explosives or something else?
omerta410 5 months ago
@KLRider the reason why you are not able to see stars is cause the stars are not bright enough for the camera. You can try it. MAke a photo at night. I dont think that you´ll see something except the moon. Only 20.000 $ cameras are able to do it. ;-)
HopfenGersteMalz 6 months ago
I love lamp
guitdude09 7 months ago
I never had a problem giving my money to NASA. As you can see, they obviously put our money to good use
folk658 7 months ago 27
@folk658 nasa gets less then 0.5% of the defence budget... the fucking US navy gets 200 billion a year, and the US Navy is already larger then the next 13 largest navys in the world put together, and 11 of these navys are allied with US... so give half that money to nasa and quit being fucking morons... space exploration is the most important thing humanity could ever do, yet they get 0.0001% of your tax dollar
101andrewj 3 months ago
@folk658 are you sure what about nasa black projects can you access that information with you money you give them
Thatboy1980 3 months ago
i see space!!!!!!!
ps2gamer1000 8 months ago
Phonix mission... to Mars :D !
1243dante 8 months ago
@1243dante
It's MER-A (Mars exploration rover A) "Spirit".
Phoenix launched at night.
blablubb12345 7 months ago
@blablubb12345 Yh...was it on 2008 i mean when it landed....
1243dante 7 months ago
Yeah this is an actual video, I was flying the rocket that day,I used to fly these babys all the time but I transitioned into the Flying Saucer Squadron out of Area 51.
Blahblobify 8 months ago
NASA IS AWSOME!
Slaaayer92 8 months ago
@Slaaayer92 was
Cabuncle 8 months ago
Wow only took 2;19 min. to reach space that's fast at 8,000 miles an hour.
getalife67 8 months ago
aha so thats how stuff looks when weightless
geppegep 11 months ago
This was great, we see spirit being lifted off to Mars looking down. Now question is : Why do they not have a cam on the probe looking ahead at Mars, giving us real live footage of the 6 month journey??It would be neat to see real live hi-def footage of the journey to, approaching, and landing on Mars. Seems beyond this ; all we get is a computer cartoon of the trip, and it's all the time on the shows they give us on channels like Discovery. Never the real journey???Until they land and rove??
snlker 1 year ago
@snlker I totally agree with you, I want cameras everywhere on those shuttles. How else can we learn and understand the whole process of space exploration. Filming more would make public interest grow and may even boost the funds that NASA get.
Its a great vid, my thanks to the uploader, whoever it was!
HarrysSecret 1 year ago 7
@snlker 99% of the journey you'll only see stars and nothing else, It's will also double or triple the weight of the spacecraft with batteries that it would need to transmit that long.
michaeldim1 11 months ago
@michaeldim1 You're kidding? A camara would triple the weight of the spacecraft?I don't think so! Part of the journey may not be worth turning on the camara, but a good portion approaching Mars would be well worth filming as astronauts did the earth on the way back from the moon. No all we get is computer animation. Powering the camara?, there is plenty of solar power.Mars' orbit is only about 35 million more miles out. If they can look down, then why not foward? Foward seems better in this case
snlker 11 months ago
@snlker Yes, triple, if you want the camera running the whole way. Scientists have been spending years eliminating every extra gram of weight they don't need, so even a camera to capture the last week or so of approach will easily consume the weight budget. Now, I understand the footage you want to see, in which case an orbiting spacecraft, not a ground rover, will get you the footage you want. Orbiters are typically equipped with cameras and solar panels anyway.
michaeldim1 11 months ago
@michaeldim1 how is a camara that heavy? Do you honestly believe they do not have a small forward looking cam on the vehicle that delivers the probe?Of coarse they do!for one,to see where they are going.The Viking probe was an orbiter and lander and had a cam? they had hi res cams in the 70's ,at least good enough beyond that fuzzy blk&wht garbage they give us.It make's no sense to send so many probes and not have at least one give us live hi-def APPROACHING footage of the last million miles :)
snlker 11 months ago
@snlker The cameras are on the probe, which is in the reentry capsule and cannot see. Also those cameras are solar powered, and with the panels stowed, they do not work. And finally, no, the probe does not need to see where it is going to reach Mars, and only use the camera after landing and extending the solar panels.
michaeldim1 11 months ago
@michaeldim1 Well it does not need a cam to go to mars, but you cant tell me they do no put one on the outside so they can see their trip? out of all those probes/orbiters they sent? I have seen the blk& white footage approaching Mars and you could see the cloud bands and everything. It was only a few frames, but mars was at least 500,000 miles away still.All I'm saying is I can not see why not a single lengthy true color hi res shot of the real mars while they approach?It is not hard to do...
snlker 11 months ago
@snlker I find it plausible that there wasn't a camera. Taking shots might not be hard, but it would have to happen at a very busy time, and unless the camera was isolated from the rest of the rocket it'd add to Things That Could Go Wrong. Every bit of payload would also need more fuel for takeoff and deceleration, and hauling up that fuel would take more fuel, et cetera.
The biggest reason is that the Odyssey, Express, and Reconnaissance Orbiter probes are in Mars orbit, with great cameras.
Kizor 11 months ago
@snlker But I'm speculating. This is the Internet Age, so you could always e-mail a NASA PR address and ask. They're publicly funded, so they're very active on the PR department. If you get an answer, please share it with us.
Kizor 11 months ago
@snlker While I do disagree with the whole front-facing camera idea, as it would be too heavy, I don't see why they can't get incredibly high-res cameras on the rovers themselves. I've seen countless photos from the rovers and other orbiters, voyagers... Perhaps those were outdated, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think an 18 megapixel camera weighs much differently than a 3 megapixel one. Those rovers take cell phone quality at best considering the cost it took to put them there
McBurger69x420 8 months ago
@McBurger69x420
You have to consider that these rovers were launched in 2003, build since 2000 and planned in the 90s. How good were cell phone cameras back then and how long would a cell phone operate in space and on the surface of mars?
blablubb12345 8 months ago
@snlker Conspiracy nuts like you are just stupid. Plain stupid. You will never believe anything until someone shoots your ass up to Mars, right? Well I WISH they would. It would be the New World all over again, but this time on Mars. You know, America started as a colony of criminals, outcasts, scum that no one wants. We should do the same thing with Mars!
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 Your response is a typical response with just ridicule, and without an actual argument,... AHHH your brotha blows bubble gum !!! I just want to see looking forward , that's all, whats wrong with my question? If they have a cam looking down, then why not forward, or at least just a forward looking cam for the journey to see the planet get larger and larger as the probe approaches in live feed (of coarse a delay because of its distance from earth)Just a question based on observation.
snlker 8 months ago
@snlker Ask them. I don't know. I figure they don't want to have 20 cameras installed that look in all kinds of directions. When you get a reply please share it with us.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 No one is asking for 20 cams. Just a forward looking cam ,or one the can have its angle changed so as to look in multiple directions , it is really not a hard thing to accomplish . . .
snlker 8 months ago
@snlker As far as I know, they don't have these cameras on the rockets to prove their flights are not faked, or to put it on Youtube, but rather for inspection if something goes wrong. The Columbia disaster in 2003 could have been prevented if they had had cameras. So these videos weren't really made for our amusement in the first place. But I could be wrong... I'm not disagreeing with you here tho. It WOULD be nice for sure.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@snlker Yes, a camera is too heavy. Even a small one. Every gram counts. It doesn't need a camera to know where it's going either, not even sensors. It's put on a carefully calculated trajectory that puts it right where it needs to go, basically they are shooting a bullet with a bullet, from a few million miles away.
Not to mention that that "live" feed would be delayed 10-20 minutes anyway.
Helge129 9 months ago
@Helge129 bullshit. These rockets have payloads weighing several tons. Another camera doesn't matter.
10-20 minutes delay? Not really. There is such a thing called a "launch window". At the best time, Mars' distance to earth is only 80 million km. Radio waves travel at 300,000 km/s. It takes roughly 5 minutes to send a transmission from Mars to Earth. For video that's good enough. But when you're also controlling the rocket it gets difficult. That's why everything's automated.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 Actually no, not bullshit. It's incredibly expensive to get even the smallest ammount of stuff into space. The distance between Mars and Earth varies from 'a few' million KM to over 150 million KM.
Helge129 8 months ago
@Helge129 actually yes, bullshit again. Or is it not right that a space shuttle can carry up to 24 tons of payload? I don't know what kind of cameras they use in your country, but they're quite light weight here. A special "space camera" won't be much heavier either. About the distances, did you even read? I even overestimated it because the orbits are elliptical not circular. So the closest Earth-Mars distance is 55 million km. That makes 3 minutes travel time. So much for 10-20 min hahahahaha
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 You do realise that at the Farthest, Earth is actually well over 300 million (not 150 as I said before...my mistake) kilometers, where it takes light to get there almost, if not full 20 minutes.
Helge129 8 months ago
@Helge129 Yes that is correct....and it wouldn't be very smart to launch a rocket to Mars when Mars is at its farthest point away! See my post -> "launch window". NASA don't shoot something up RANDOMLY. It's all carefully calculated.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
From 0 to speed of sound in 35 sec, insane force involved concider the weight.
dtiydr 1 year ago
At 1:30 the left jettison booster became a bit black on top, like if it was a bit burnt, is it because of the sun or speed, or is it just a shadow...?
nicoon59 1 year ago
I can't believe how quickly it accelerates, and how quickly the liquid on the outside of the rocket body freezes. You can see the curvature of the Earth and the receding ground within about 30 seconds of liftoff!
george7378 1 year ago
its so impressive how the sound come out when it reach the space...
its weird to imagine all without sound, outside the ship, sure...
no air = no sound
TJChagas 1 year ago
@TJChagas I just noticed that, isnt that mad!
Unit21100 1 year ago
is that booster droping into earth.wont that hit a city.
tinkerbell6245 1 year ago
@tinkerbell6245 all the boosters and stages that fall to earth have parachutes and the launch is on a slight angle towards the ocean.. no citys were harmed in the making of this video
originalbrodyg420 1 year ago
@tinkerbell6245
the boosts is calculated to drop on middle ocean, so they can catch em later...
TJChagas 1 year ago
0 to Mach 1 in 33 seconds
detibry 1 year ago
green board?
Team4tressfan 1 year ago
You wouldnt get me in one of them fuckers
gorillaz308 1 year ago 2
for everyone whos saying its "fake" are complete idiots im guessing your the same sorta people who believe in UFO's ( also known as low orbit satellites ) and if it makes a really bright light for 4 seconds its known as a satellite flare ( solar panels facing earth,,, another fact that its real is that i went to see the launch of Delta 2. :)
kirza94 1 year ago
This is real, I watched the launch.
itsaidhi 1 year ago
its real
ICCE300 1 year ago
That's so beautiful.
StuntBanker 1 year ago
now lets see video of rocket traveling from earth to mars..............? Hmmmm
cycloneCJproducts 1 year ago
hhh
cycloneCJproducts 1 year ago
And now I'm wondering what is safer, the Space Shuttles that seem to be being used way beyond their designed ability; or these new Ares rockets, sitting on these millions of pounds of high explosives?
camarorider67 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And now I'm wondering what is safer, the Space Shuttles that seem to be being used way beyond their designed ability; or these new Delta rockets, sitting on these millions of pounds of high explosives?
camarorider67 1 year ago
I figured it out.
He must be using Velcro to hold onto.
That's the only way it could be done.
91238673 1 year ago
How did the cameraman hold on? That thing must be going like 200 M.P.H.!
91238673 1 year ago
@91238673 ugh duh its stuck on! wtf why would they be holing a camera????
rysternightstalk 1 year ago
@91238673
what camera man?
and how the hell could someone get above our atmosphere with just 200 mph? lol
strikeout1991 1 year ago
@91238673 LMAO. at 200 mph you can't even achieve orbit. Your ignorance is extraordinary. Just for your information, to achieve low earth orbit you need a velocity of 7.7 km/s, i.e. 17 THOUSAND mph. But that's not even near enough to leave Earth. The escape velocity is 11km/s or 24,600 mph and you'd need that to go to Mars.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 You still haven't explained how the camera man hung on.
Whose stupid now?
91238673 8 months ago
@91238673 The camera man is obviously your mom! Don't you see? She has magical powers.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
0:50 doh... you can't "exceed the supersonic speed", supersonic is anything higher than speed of sound
ertyqwer 1 year ago
@ertyqwer supersonic is mach 1. aircraft always go faster than mach 1.
arsenal553 1 year ago
@arsenal553 mach 1 is "sonic" (speed of sound). "supersonic" is anything higher than that. you can't exceed velocity that isn't defined.
and no, aircraft don't always go faster than mach 1. in fact, most don't ever go nearly as fast.
ertyqwer 1 year ago
It looks fake when the motors fall out but badass take off
themessness1234 1 year ago
wow! this is sooo awesome!!!
snorkamaiden 1 year ago
Who thinks this is fake, is a total idiot
barthoedemaker 1 year ago
loving how it turned blue, what happened, was that ice?
guineapigboy 1 year ago
The rocket is painted is blue, after a while all ice that builds up during refueling melts of.
lennartsmit 1 year ago
hey it changed color!
zombieX111222333 1 year ago
why people ask wether it is fake or not ???? No questions! This is a real footage for tracking engineers to control when and what goes wrong in case of staging failures during launch e.g.
berndpfe 2 years ago 32
This is an absolute fake to ward off any potential stowaways trying to escape democracy.
IronManu77 1 year ago
this is real fuckin footage
travis199urkul 1 year ago
Happy landing.
IronManu77 1 year ago
@berndpfe why is it spraying water?
TonyFirelli 1 year ago
@berndpfe Its a fashion nowadays to term everything as either "fake" or "gay". I guess they think its cool to say these words.
strangerindanger 5 months ago
@berndpfe NO IT'S FAKE, GOVERMENT LYING TO US, I SAW IT ON TV! hurr
HungryGreeny 4 months ago
@HungryGreeny okay...
lolvks 4 months ago
@HungryGreeny do u believe everything u see on tv u dumb ass!
morethanjustrandom 3 months ago
@HungryGreeny do u believe everything u see on tv u dumb ass!
morethanjustrandom 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HungryGreeny do u believe everything u see on tv u dumb ass!
morethanjustrandom 3 months ago
when did it break the sound barrier?
MYNAMEROBERT 2 years ago 2
0:49
sloterfilmgroep 2 years ago
noooooo!! lol... this axuliarrockets godown over sea, and itis recolected for new use
cocokoky 2 years ago
The booster rockets on the Delta rocket are not recovered. They sink in the ocean.
mach25man 2 years ago
OMG are you people for real?
Its not fake and they take off over the sea in case it goes wrong and then it wont land in you back yard you hick !
SithLordJames 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
RandoomBiscuits 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake...?
runecathy391 2 years ago
does he really ask if it is real? C'mon you joker. sell me the swamp land right next to the launch pad.
brucebu 2 years ago
Its real, this was televised live when they launched Spirit. I find it hard to believe that you can't tell if its real or fake.
faosfx 2 years ago
this is real
starbabe58 2 years ago
can those ejected rockets come down and hit us while someone is mowing their lawn?
213kilacali 2 years ago
the atmosphere probably burns them up
alexzhu1 2 years ago
No, there's a reason they launch over the ocean.
aeroeng314 2 years ago
its not real ? its real
adsonkool 2 years ago
of course it is real!
If you search on youtube, you will find tons of other similar videos.
piranha031091 2 years ago
the fire in space looks cool! :P
tarded55 2 years ago
nice video, but people putting thier copyright and web page on this is stupid. This can be gotten from NASA and its not your creation or your property..
fairlanejay 2 years ago 49
@fairlanejay You're right. Just consider how often the song "let the body hit the floor" is used in youtube clips. I can't hear it anymore
FilmComposeRaHoppe 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your mom is fake
Bonzenpunk 2 years ago
Awesome, the power of a rocket. Just incredible. Imagine that thing makes 2000 mph and more, but vertical. The fastest plane, the sr71 needs the best technology on earth to reach 2000 mph horizontal.
Ferrorschini 2 years ago
Within 10 seconds Delta was pitching over form the vertical so it was not going vertical. Notice how the ground changes due to the changing angle of the climb.........
artwleb 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is fake, it takes of to fast, and the flames are fake
warfan90 2 years ago
It's not fake, watch al the billion other launches, for example the Falcon 1-RazakSat launch earlier this morning (June 14th) that was broadcasted live.
joeceph 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the background is real but the flames and the smoke are fake
warfan90 2 years ago
in the space everything is diferent! man 0 gravity ....
Fabycfr91 2 years ago
So is your education buddy.
EndeavourLaunch 2 years ago
You have got to be kidding me... Your not serious are you?
Mpntball2012 2 years ago
Such epic footage...
RUFan4Life 2 years ago
or is it peeling paint at first, then water build up and finally its freezing?
rnewcomb92 2 years ago
is the change in the color of the rocket´s surface a temperature change(meaning ice or water build up)???
rnewcomb92 2 years ago
There is water on the rocket thank so the liquid nitrogen or w/e it is
rogelead 2 years ago
It's because of the liquid oxygen (not nitrogen). It's cryogenic, so the surface of the rocket is very cold.
aeroeng314 2 years ago
Spirit is still running on Mars!
flamencoprof 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is fake. Look at 1:33
Fire in the space where there is no O2 ???
Also ithe small rockets falling off remind me of the look of a 3D Animation.
cirro1 2 years ago
Fire doesn't always need 02... In this case the 02 is being supplied by the propellant tanks that use liquid oxygen. It's real.
janeelliott57 2 years ago
they obviously have some sort of tank suppling the 02 to the fuel
stroutsy 2 years ago
The video is real. You obviously have issues determining reality from animation. None of this is animated.
Rocket engines in space are typically liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen engines. Oxygen must be present or your rocket won't be firing anything.
scythelord 2 years ago
How to fuck do people come back from the moon? they just somehow be able to take off without any thrust? It's real
PolxenTwo 2 years ago
Comment removed
criskeys 2 years ago
The lunar module had a thruster to leave the surface of the moon. The thruster didn't have to be very big and the module didn't have to be aerodynamic in the sub-, trans- and supersonic regions (different properties in each) and so on. This is because the moon has no dense atmosphere, aka no air resistance, and only about 1/6th of the earth's gravitational pull at SL.
joeceph 2 years ago 2
The comment says 'I don't know if it's real or not' - of course it is!
syrus3k 2 years ago
Love the SRB separation! Gives you an idea of the speed it travels.
stegaflaps 2 years ago
wow thats pretty dang awesome!
ronny4ever123 3 years ago 2
looks so carm fomr there
52jaak 3 years ago
The speed of lift off and passing through supersonic after 34 sec. is amazing!
sking0369 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nothing amazing. a bullet can do that in a fraction of a second.
sanddune1981 3 years ago
Yes, but a bullet doesn't weight 500 tonnes.
jackjohnbob 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
But it accelerates 5000 times faster. and some "bullets" in WW2 weighted 7 tonnes what makes their acceleration about 40 times more amazing then of the space ship )))))
sanddune1981 3 years ago
Are you kidding me!?!? Hahaha!
niagwai 2 years ago
But then again the Enterprise 1701 can accelerate to warp speed faster than you can say Smith & Wesson.
jfm010 2 years ago 3
@sanddune1981 And what was their range? 30km, 50km , 100km? None of those bullets ever even came close to achieving orbit you fucking moron.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
wow so amazing!
niyascat 3 years ago
Shit, thats amazing.
sebastrik 3 years ago
I don't think I'll ever grow tired of watching this video...... amazing!
Ravenflight104 3 years ago
Mer-a Spirit Rover Launched on June 10, 2003
ZRKFilms 3 years ago
its foam protecting the thin parts
eytychios 3 years ago
what happens to the cylinder things that fall from the rocket, do they hit people?
Dumihead2 3 years ago
they splash down in the Atlantic Ocean, they hit fish (just a joke)
flatsignedbooks 3 years ago
hehe
and they serve as food for whales!!!!!
swarooptheone 3 years ago