your right pcs does not represent all Christians, ive met many reasonable kind and understanding Christians, but I think the reason he is "accepting the challenge" is because of PCS's influence and the many people who follow him, thunderf00t probably hopes that the more he proves him wrong the more reasonable his followers might become
Poseidon500 - Your beliefs are no different than PCS's. Why do you bother? You would just state the same ole tired unfounded non-sense that PCS would.
Well, the part where Ray said that Thunderf00t wouyld ahve to be omnecient and know the minds of every man to say that they have not had an experierience with God. It was a good point.
in a way i guess, although i'd be inclined to say that, if they cannot prove it (or atleast present evidence) then there is absolutely no reason for anyone to believe them, ie. the burden of proof always lies with those making the affirmative claim. in terms of the collective knowledge of man-kind no-one has.
however this was a somewhat of ant irrelevant side note, i was hoping you could point out one of Rays actual arguments
your right pcs does not represent all Christians, ive met many reasonable kind and understanding Christians, but I think the reason he is "accepting the challenge" is because of PCS's influence and the many people who follow him, thunderf00t probably hopes that the more he proves him wrong the more reasonable his followers might become
Netruic 9 months ago
Poseidon500 - Your beliefs are no different than PCS's. Why do you bother? You would just state the same ole tired unfounded non-sense that PCS would.
holio84 1 year ago
Really?
You're nothing more than a prejudiced piece of trash.
Now don't bother me anymore.
Poseidon500 1 year ago
Well yes.
I have always thought that a "Holy Experience' is a personal one, and that it cannot be proven.
Maybe theists are mental, maybe they are not. : )
I am a theist. I may be mental. ; )
Poseidon500 2 years ago
im interested, you said Ray brought up points thunderf00t couldn't address, may i ask what they were?
whilst i am certain they were properly addressed in thunderf00ts series...hmm wonder why thunder doesnt make Ray the new hovind of his channel
types10000 2 years ago
Well, the part where Ray said that Thunderf00t wouyld ahve to be omnecient and know the minds of every man to say that they have not had an experierience with God. It was a good point.
Poseidon500 2 years ago
in a way i guess, although i'd be inclined to say that, if they cannot prove it (or atleast present evidence) then there is absolutely no reason for anyone to believe them, ie. the burden of proof always lies with those making the affirmative claim. in terms of the collective knowledge of man-kind no-one has.
however this was a somewhat of ant irrelevant side note, i was hoping you could point out one of Rays actual arguments
types10000 2 years ago
The point is, they do not have to prove it. It has been proven to them, and a relationship with is supposed to be a personal one.
I will have to examine the video in more detail whern I have the time to give you an actual example.
Peace.
Poseidon500 2 years ago
Tf00t answers your question at the beginning of his video "debating a creationist part 3"
xJediHowieX 2 years ago
Yeah I agree. PCS isn't worth thunderf00t's time.
fuckingdamon1 2 years ago
I mean, why make VFX any more infamous.
Poseidon500 2 years ago
Pposeidon...what the heck you're talking about? I'm cluless here...HOw the quitting going? I'm down to 6/day.....lol
classicallady 2 years ago
This ws just a video response to thunderf00t.
Poseidon500 2 years ago