Wonderful to here this! Joseph Joachim was the greatest violinist of the mid nineteenth century..very close friend of Brahms, consulted all along as Brahms wrote the violin concerto! He also was responsible for the re-discovery of the Beethoven Violin Concerto in 1844 when he was twelve! He was the soloist with the Leipzieg Gewandhaus, conductor? Felix Mendlessohn! Wrote a wonderful cadenza to the Beethoven still played today!..As to Huberman..look up the story on his Strad, now J Bell's!
Along with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, and Schumann, Brahms sits on a legendary and imomortal throne, having expressed ideas through music that were not simply of an age but of a timeless quality, increasing the quality of humanity through art to greater depths. To hear Joseph Joachim live is a blessing beyond words. It's not only because he worked intimately with Brahms, in this recording I no longer hear a violin, I hear a beautiful singing voice!
Along with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, and Schumann, Brahms sits on a legendary and imomortal throne, having expressed ideas through music that were not simply of an age but of a timeless quality, increasing the quality of humanity through art to greater depths. To hear Joseph Joachim live is a blessing beyond words. It's not only because he worked intimately with Brahms, in this recording I no longer hear a violin, I hear a beautiful singing voice!
Fantastic to see that even Hungarian Dances were played with no vibrato at all!!! Lesson to all excessive lovers of the vibrato today with no understanding where is needed and where not. Another lesson to the purist-authentists: no rubato doesn´t mean dry, square and boring rendering!!
@eldarshus351 Did you listen to it? There is definitely vibrato there! You cannot say there is no 'vibrato'. He simply uses sparingly, as did many classical and baroque-era string players as told in most of the old treatises (Geminiani, L. Mozart, for example)
It's called aristic liberty..interesting interpretation...you hate it to start with but then it grows on you and how..you appreciate it more and more like a vintage wine...brilliant musicianship..he was a good friend of Brahms...thanks for such a rare clip...
Also remember, early recording devices were turned by hand or with primitive mechanisms (note the gurgles and shifts of pitch). While this could be digitally fixed, why bother, you will never get the same sound as being in the room. How amazing it would be to listen to all the masters who lived long ago. Tartini, Paganini, Joachim, Kreisler, Auer...
Thanks for this moment of the musical history! If only we think this man in his life worked "tête a tête" not only with Brahms, but also with Mendelssohn, Liszt, Clara Schumann, Wieniawski... And always with very intense relationships. So we're really hearing a performance that includes a piece of musical history!
Wow, it's nice hearing something from the turn-of-the century (1900). Soo much has changed over the past 100 years, has an excelent charm that seems to be lost in time, just the way I am interpreting the music. 21/22! (MY RATING SYSTEM!XD)
Joachim was the close friend and virtuoso for whom Brahms wrote the violin concerto and the double concerto. Accordingly, think of this as coming closest to what Brahms himself envisioned for this work.
Well in Germany, where I'm from, a newspaper made an edition of some famous violinists, among them Bronislav Huberman, and on his cd there can be found this piece.
No you r not ignorant, one cannot now every little thing about this large thematic.
Sorry aimson, that info about beeing the first to have recorded is not that right, because there exists a recording of the Moment Musicaux by Schuman played by Bronislav Huberman in 1899.
But you said he is considered to be...., so it is not your fault.
Do you have a link or any info proving this? I just did a google search of Bronislaw Huberman and there is no mention of anything recorded in 1899. Honestly, I've never even heard of the name, which shows some of my own ignorance.
@aimson -You don't search well nor far.Right here on you tube is Bronislaw Huberman playing the Tchaikovsky violin concerto. Leopold Auer a pre Heifetz violin virtuoso is also represented here on you tube.
@paulostroff99 Neither of those were born before Joachim. Joachim (Born 1831) is the oldest born violinst on record, possibly the first recorded, unless you can provide conclusive proof that recordings of the violin were made before 1903.
hmmm, interesting, Huberman was just 17 when recording this. Though a discography states 1900 as recording date (could be release date) on Berliner records. But, here a recording of Nocturne in E flat (Chopin- arr Sarasate) is mentioned as his first one. Now... wouldn't we wanna hear that !! :p
I might agree with you and disagree with a personal friend of Brahms IF you were really the personal friend of Brahms and Joachim was some kid on the internet. Just a thought. I think you might have rephrased your comment to be a bit less presumptuous, even though I mostly agree.
Haha, George Carlin fan too? You missed the part about opinions being like assholes, everybody's got them and they all stink. At least on the internet...
it's really an interesting version. The peace is so slow, quite different from today's play. Perhaps it is the genuine style Brahms design for. However, really thanks.
Fascinating. I love it. I'm a novice when it comes to classical music, but Brahms's Violin Concerto is what drew me in, so I have been very curious about Joachim.
Again, a novice, so I don't know how to properly describe what I'm hearing, but it seems to me that there's something amazing about his timing in particular...
I can't get over the tempo of this rendition. It's so different from what I'm used to. Nowadays, it's played almost frantically by comparison. This almost sounds too slow though there is a certain something that gives it an enormous appeal. Perhaps, it is that this man was playing a piece written in his life time by a man he knew well and not one written in the past by a stranger known only by music and reputation..
Well, the recording is a little pitched down, which also decreases the speed a bit. But I agree, today's musicians focus much more on speed and technique rather than on the music itself. In my opinion, giving music to people is much better than just "showing-off". But even today's public is carefully following violinists for technical "stunts", which is a sign of how different our times are, in comparision to maybe 70-100 years ago.
Amazing to hear this type of playing so diff from the vibrato adn portamento We al think r old fashioned.I must find Auer's playing.Then HeifetzElman Milsteinpushed this russian school out into prominence. Sarasate andYsaye left rec .Must hear!
I think you can find both on youtube. I know you can find Sarasate. His style sounds very different than Joachim's though. Much more precise and less ornamented. Perhaps, it's more accurate to say that his ornamentation is just different.
i didnt know that there is a recording. this is really a step in old times. funny ornamentation. sounds sometimes like a yiddish way of playing. strange glissandi. thanks!
Not surprising his style would have a Yiddish flavor. He was born a Jew, you know. He also studied with Mendelsohn who was another converted Jew. I'm really excited about hearing this. It reminds me of noone more than Jascha Heifetz. I love the glisandi. Almost makes the violin sound human. Wish more modern players did this. Of ocurse, with the music written these days, they don't relaly have cause to truly make their instrument sing like that.
i thought the same. i have recordings from jewish violinists played in 1910 to 1925. similar attitude. nice. not much vibrato with many glissandi. sounds far a bit like synagogal singing. and this strange tempo changings...
Amazig to be able to hear this sound. coming from another time... The quality is poor, but what i still cannot figure ow big an heritage this is for mankind.. That sound was produced by a guy born in 1830... same year
Did you guys know there's a recording of Leopold Auer playing this? It's interesting to listen to the lineage: Joachim was Auer's Teacher. and Auer was Heifetz's teacher. They all have recordings of this piece. The best by far is Heifetz, then Joachim, then Auer.
It's the gut strings he used; they sound different. I tried playing along with him on the first few bars with a properly tuned violin, steel strings, and the notes match perfectly.
Lol what are you talking about? That's nonsense, just because he's using gut strings doesn't mean that the pitch is going to be any different, afterall, Sarasate's recordings were up to pitch. It was probably just the recording technology or Joachim's own choice, afterall the Bach recording is a quartertone flate
If on google you search "joseph joachim recording" and click on the first result it pulls up a very interesting article. Towards the end of the article it discusses the difference between modern day interpretation and 19th century interpretation and the significance of Joachim's recordings.
i cant tell you how wonderful it is to finally hear the man who influenced and was involved with the violin works of brahms, and schumann and basically single handedly revived the beethoven concerto, i try to imagine what the violin repertiore would have been like without him, not to mention the hungarian violin concerto he wrote is wonderful
This a masterful rendering of the piece. The phrasing is so perfect for the style, and shows the freedom that Brahms must have expected with his rhythms. What a wonderful violinist. (Of course the technique isn't as good as Gil Shaham or Heifetz. Get over it.)
How do you know his technique isn't as good? After all, he was the first to premier the Brahms violin concerto - and without complaint. It's hard to tell from the few recordings he made how good his technique is, especially since he was about 73 when he made this recording
(continued) I can only imagine how he played in his youth! As for Sarasate, that may be why you guys think his technique is a little lacking, these guys were so old when they made these recordings that they obviously won't play as well as they did when they were younger. I can only imagine how Paganini must've sounded
Man, I can't stop listening to this. Despite the fact that there's barely any vibrato if any, and despite the crappy 1904 sound quality, his playing is so intense and fiery. His portamento sounds greater than even that of Kreisler or Heifetz. What's even more amazing is that this recording was made when he was 73!.
Is the original Hungarian Dance no.1 in f# minor? Joachim plays this in f# minor, i'm not sure if it's the recording or he actually tuned his violin down.
Your ears are completely right, but todays "A" is 442-443 and this is the reason. About thirty years ago it was 440 and the year of 1900 even less. During these hundred years it makes it a small second interval (I'm not sure how to put in English), thus f# instead of todays g-minor. I hope, my explanation is clear.
Are you sure about that? I know in the baroque/classical era they tuned to A-415 but if you listen to Sarasate's Gypsy Airs (which was recorded along with Joachim's hungarian dance) it is in c minor, and the notes are up to today's tuning, if not then very close to it.
AbsoluteZ3R0, I can't find any other explanation.
The transcription made by Joachim himself is in g-minor.
But, sometimes, I wonder what they do with the old recordings, while transferring them to CD. Yesterday I've heard Fritz Kreisler playing the Beethoven concerto with Sir John Barbirolli from 1935. Wonderful, and it was todays D major, but it should be in a lower D than today at least.
A440 wasn't adopted as a standard until 1955. Before that, the A was whatever people felt it should be at the time... and you can imagine that it would be different in different parts of the world with no telephones, recordings, or anything to bridge the distance between places. Which is why today's "historically informed" practice of making A415 standard for Baroque performances is a little absurd. There may have very well been performances back then where the A was tuned closer to 440.
If that's tre then how come most recordings from the early 20th century are relatively at A-440 if not give or take a couple hertz? Where did you learn that? Was it in an article of some sort? Because if so I want to read it
My late father who died aged 90 in 2002, told me that his great great grandfather actually went and heard Paganini in Dublin Ireland. Apparently he was mistified that Paganini didn't " sound like a normal fiddler". Those were his words. Of course he was amazed at Paganini.
He certainly was extremely lucky to have heard Paganini, even though concerts would have been so different in those days.I remember my late father telling me what he had been told about it.
And yet Joachim was regarded in his time as being the best violinist the world had seen-yes,even better than Paganini. Paginini,it should be remembered actively encouraged the'cult of personality' surrounding him ,wheras Joachim was interested only in being a servant of the music.
Thank you very much. Actually Sarasate himself plays much worse than most of the modern soloists in intonation and clearity. But Joachim brought tears to my eyes in this piece :)
You have to remember that things were different back then. It didn't matter so much to make mistakes or play notes out of tune. The fact is that Sarasate was one of the greatest violinists of the 19th century, regardless of how many mistakes he made. But you are right, his technique could use a little work... :)
As a composer, yes he is one of the greatest, but as a violinist, as you also see, not so good :) I expected something much better than Ysaye or Joachim or Perlman or Heifetz. I hope that Paganini is not like this :)
Yeah, even in this crappy recording it still sounds great lol. If Joachim had been born more recently I'm sure he would've rivaled Heifetz and the other great virtuosos of the 20th century.
You're very welcome. Thanks for enjoying it! I think more people need to be exposed to more music, especially the older generation of violinists. I only wish I had more video to share (I do, but can't figure out a way to rip it!)
Yeah, Brahms was considered one of Joachim's colleagues, along with Max Bruch and Franz Liszt and Robert Schumann. I'm not sure he had many downs with Brahms but I do know he and Liszt had some pretty hot arguments later in Joachim's life.
Joachim was angry with Brahms. The Double Concerto was an effort at appeasement on Brahms' part. The funny part was that it gave much more prominence to the cello than to the violin. Thanks again for posting this rare audio!
Brahms definetely had a close relationship with Joachim. His violin Concerto is dedicated to Joachim after all...and it's widely noted that Brahms' original violin concerto was cut down by joachim who insisted on making changes (which brahms listended and followed)
i'm relearning the brahm's concertos now with his arrangements....
the double stops are very hard at such break neck speeds but the payoff at the end will be very worth it
246trinitrotoluene 2 months ago
Joseph Joachim(1831-1907)
was a Hungarian violinist, conductor, composer and teacher.
Wow! Absolutely Fantastic!!! Thank you aimson for sharing.
MrGer2295 4 months ago
i don't tend to like conservative Hungarian music as opposed to Franz Liszt and stuff like that but this is definitely an exception.
ROBOTNIK28 6 months ago
Why does it sound like a sad jewish song?..
cheburechka 8 months ago
is any of Joachim's recording out on any cd?
beeteep60 11 months ago
wow that is so flat it sounds like a viola
violiner9391 1 year ago
This is what this german got after firing the first guy. 8-)) ~~~
sostenuto 1 year ago
Awesome! TY
paulostroff99 1 year ago
Comment removed
paulostroff99 1 year ago
pre-vibrato era :) if it was their best guy, who were the others I wonder?
symfotroll 1 year ago
Miraculous. Thank you for fantastic archive.
vstasov 1 year ago
good but bad quali
mrramba 1 year ago
He is 72 years old here--that's 72 years in a time of no antibiotics and only aspirin for muscle pain. Certainly past his prime.
Instructive how little vibrato he uses and even though he plays freely, his playing is structured and disciplined.
Like listening to a ghost--how enormously fascinating!
ipmoic 1 year ago
Wonderful to here this! Joseph Joachim was the greatest violinist of the mid nineteenth century..very close friend of Brahms, consulted all along as Brahms wrote the violin concerto! He also was responsible for the re-discovery of the Beethoven Violin Concerto in 1844 when he was twelve! He was the soloist with the Leipzieg Gewandhaus, conductor? Felix Mendlessohn! Wrote a wonderful cadenza to the Beethoven still played today!..As to Huberman..look up the story on his Strad, now J Bell's!
TheMmesser 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Along with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, and Schumann, Brahms sits on a legendary and imomortal throne, having expressed ideas through music that were not simply of an age but of a timeless quality, increasing the quality of humanity through art to greater depths. To hear Joseph Joachim live is a blessing beyond words. It's not only because he worked intimately with Brahms, in this recording I no longer hear a violin, I hear a beautiful singing voice!
Ascendyourthinking 1 year ago
Along with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, and Schumann, Brahms sits on a legendary and imomortal throne, having expressed ideas through music that were not simply of an age but of a timeless quality, increasing the quality of humanity through art to greater depths. To hear Joseph Joachim live is a blessing beyond words. It's not only because he worked intimately with Brahms, in this recording I no longer hear a violin, I hear a beautiful singing voice!
Ascendyourthinking 1 year ago
Im in Love.....
violin957 1 year ago
Many thanks for posting this piece of history.
NiallMS 1 year ago
Splendid
796824 1 year ago
Fantastic to see that even Hungarian Dances were played with no vibrato at all!!! Lesson to all excessive lovers of the vibrato today with no understanding where is needed and where not. Another lesson to the purist-authentists: no rubato doesn´t mean dry, square and boring rendering!!
eldarshus351 1 year ago 6
So true! Not forgetting that Joachim and Brahms were great friends,and played the Hungarian dances together many times with Brahms playing the piano.
shiveringflower 1 year ago
@eldarshus351 Did you listen to it? There is definitely vibrato there! You cannot say there is no 'vibrato'. He simply uses sparingly, as did many classical and baroque-era string players as told in most of the old treatises (Geminiani, L. Mozart, for example)
PDQGorby 1 year ago
This is great!!!
CJbouzouki 2 years ago
Se pensiamo alla registrazione preistirica il Maestro è formidabile.
Grazie Maestro per questa bella musica e anche se non c'è più,un grazie lo stesso-Salvatore Villani-Firenze
salvavillani 2 years ago
this is probably the way the music is to be performed. Freedom of spirit!!!!!!!! we have to seek the heart and not the cold printed notes.
ElEsquisProductions 2 years ago 3
Remember - this man knew Brahms personally!
wks1978 2 years ago 3
Considerable emotional and spiritual content. Fabulous reference.
davidgee100 2 years ago
Comment removed
Sviolinist 2 years ago
It is extremely interesting to hear his interpretation on his arrangement of this piece...
jettviolin 2 years ago
very beautiful, even with the static in the background.
PhilipLu3 2 years ago
Epic song:D beautiful 5/5
ValentinZdravko 2 years ago
For those of you interested in tuning standards, the following book is a fine academic study:
A History of Performing Pitch: the History of "A" by Clara Marvin. Very useful, interesting and quite well organised.
pugandblizzard 2 years ago
Absolutely wonderful.
cattleman6420012000 2 years ago 2
thanks , many many for the great pleasure in listening a"dirty" records, !!! please find out similars records... compliments
emattei44 2 years ago
very beautyful
Culteri 2 years ago
thanks for posting such a historic recording..
gimaru1 2 years ago 4
It's called aristic liberty..interesting interpretation...you hate it to start with but then it grows on you and how..you appreciate it more and more like a vintage wine...brilliant musicianship..he was a good friend of Brahms...thanks for such a rare clip...
BoratBrother 2 years ago
This is wonderful? Just out of curiosity why is this recording almost a tone down..almost F minor instead of G minor.
mrausar 2 years ago
The international standard pitch A=440 Hz is from 1939.
AngelicaTross 2 years ago 3
Also remember, early recording devices were turned by hand or with primitive mechanisms (note the gurgles and shifts of pitch). While this could be digitally fixed, why bother, you will never get the same sound as being in the room. How amazing it would be to listen to all the masters who lived long ago. Tartini, Paganini, Joachim, Kreisler, Auer...
9031879134 2 years ago 3
he is my grate grate grate grate grate grandfather it's true
jacksgirl365 3 years ago 2
great
hildagrim 2 years ago 11
This is a very nice recording. Very peaceful.
ZeroGhostDog 3 years ago
Thanks for this moment of the musical history! If only we think this man in his life worked "tête a tête" not only with Brahms, but also with Mendelssohn, Liszt, Clara Schumann, Wieniawski... And always with very intense relationships. So we're really hearing a performance that includes a piece of musical history!
ocramizz 3 years ago
Does anyone have the "sheet music" of this transcription?
AngelicaTross 3 years ago
i have it for piano
carlotajoaquinaporra 3 years ago
no but i have the violin and piano accompaniament parts of my own transcription
thementalfiddler 2 years ago
oh, never mind--dyslexic moment--its "cavatina"
anyway, great music!!
1ataloss1 3 years ago
Is that the guitar piece used in the film The Deerhunter?
mobytoss 3 years ago
thats what i heard but idrk
1ataloss1 3 years ago
theres a beautiful piece by Joseph Joachim Raff called "Catavina" but i cant find it anywhere on the internet!! does anyone know about it??
1ataloss1 3 years ago
Not sure about the net, but there is a piece called 'Cavatine' by Raff on 'Romantic Piano Favourites Vol 6' on the Naxos label.
greekyboy123 3 years ago
Actually - ignore my previous posting - if you haven't done so already, search for 'Raff Cavatina' here and you will find various postings.
greekyboy123 3 years ago
That's one gangsta dude.
ProfessaBojangles1 3 years ago
Great to hear a brahms' friend plays his work.
Brahms had a strong belief in Joachim so all the tempos and nuances we are listening to is a certain composer approved material!
and what a touch he had with right hand on arc..wow..nice sound.
too bad old recording detuned his bass notes.
a priceless recording.
lastnaturemistake 3 years ago 2
Wow, it's nice hearing something from the turn-of-the century (1900). Soo much has changed over the past 100 years, has an excelent charm that seems to be lost in time, just the way I am interpreting the music. 21/22! (MY RATING SYSTEM!XD)
CylonAndrew 3 years ago
Joachim was the close friend and virtuoso for whom Brahms wrote the violin concerto and the double concerto. Accordingly, think of this as coming closest to what Brahms himself envisioned for this work.
nbarry45 3 years ago
that my name:D:D nice!!!
xx1804 3 years ago
About Joachim:( his life, CDs etc. in german) fuer-die-ohren . at / Joseph-Joachim-CD . s h t m l
GerdLinden 3 years ago
Great interpretation
GerdLinden 3 years ago
Well in Germany, where I'm from, a newspaper made an edition of some famous violinists, among them Bronislav Huberman, and on his cd there can be found this piece.
No you r not ignorant, one cannot now every little thing about this large thematic.
(sry for my english).
Regards
MarlowStardust
MarlowStardust 3 years ago
Sorry aimson, that info about beeing the first to have recorded is not that right, because there exists a recording of the Moment Musicaux by Schuman played by Bronislav Huberman in 1899.
But you said he is considered to be...., so it is not your fault.
Regards
MarlowStardust
MarlowStardust 3 years ago
Do you have a link or any info proving this? I just did a google search of Bronislaw Huberman and there is no mention of anything recorded in 1899. Honestly, I've never even heard of the name, which shows some of my own ignorance.
aimson 3 years ago
@aimson -You don't search well nor far.Right here on you tube is Bronislaw Huberman playing the Tchaikovsky violin concerto. Leopold Auer a pre Heifetz violin virtuoso is also represented here on you tube.
paulostroff99 1 year ago
@paulostroff99 Neither of those were born before Joachim. Joachim (Born 1831) is the oldest born violinst on record, possibly the first recorded, unless you can provide conclusive proof that recordings of the violin were made before 1903.
wks1978 1 year ago
@aimson -He may well have been the greatest violinist ever!
paulostroff99 1 year ago
@aimson Joachim was not the first violinist to record, but he was the first "major" violinist to have recorded as you correctly stated in 1903.
secretchromaticart 1 year ago
@secretchromaticart Pablo de Sarasate also made a recording in 1903
danielsilva1977 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aimson Joachim was not the first violinist to record, but he was the first "major" violinist to have recorded as you correctly stated in 1903.
secretchromaticart 1 year ago
@aimson You never heard of the Huberman strad bro?
roadwarrior1981 10 months ago
@aimson You may not have of Huberman, but you have almost definitely heard his violin--it is currently owned by Joshua Bell.
foxparkmusic 7 months ago
@aimson: hiermit versuchen: /watch?v=PMhWR9RgKjs
SimonS7r 3 months ago
hmmm, interesting, Huberman was just 17 when recording this. Though a discography states 1900 as recording date (could be release date) on Berliner records. But, here a recording of Nocturne in E flat (Chopin- arr Sarasate) is mentioned as his first one. Now... wouldn't we wanna hear that !! :p
sobie99 3 years ago
Comment removed
McLellandPianoStudio 3 years ago
I might agree with you and disagree with a personal friend of Brahms IF you were really the personal friend of Brahms and Joachim was some kid on the internet. Just a thought. I think you might have rephrased your comment to be a bit less presumptuous, even though I mostly agree.
aimson 3 years ago
Comment removed
McLellandPianoStudio 3 years ago
Haha, George Carlin fan too? You missed the part about opinions being like assholes, everybody's got them and they all stink. At least on the internet...
aimson 3 years ago
lol
GODSFISTS 3 years ago
Comment removed
paulostroff99 1 year ago
@McLellandPianoStudio -Have you never heard of a gluewein.It is a hot red wine drink made to deal with colds. Very much used in Germany.
paulostroff99 1 year ago
Wow! I had heard of Joachim, but never heard him play. It's really interesting to hear something played a century ago.
AmateurViolinist 3 years ago 5
it's really an interesting version. The peace is so slow, quite different from today's play. Perhaps it is the genuine style Brahms design for. However, really thanks.
funfunfuntw01 3 years ago 4
Wonderful! Bravo! TY.
paulostroff99 3 years ago 4
this is alot better than the solo piano version, very beautiful. I like the cziffratranscription very much of this piece also
singsinsing 3 years ago 2
merci beaucoup...
akfakmail 3 years ago
is that Brahms at the piano? I think nobody is sure... but I think it must be.
Sviolinist 3 years ago
Brahms was dead at that time
davidj1011 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
va fan går filmen ut på en jävla gubbe med fiol som ska köra upp den i rövhålet
sigiiss 3 years ago
Beautiful!!!
holle1987 3 years ago
AMAZING!
super originality..
abuhm 3 years ago 2
Fascinating. I love it. I'm a novice when it comes to classical music, but Brahms's Violin Concerto is what drew me in, so I have been very curious about Joachim.
Again, a novice, so I don't know how to properly describe what I'm hearing, but it seems to me that there's something amazing about his timing in particular...
seasaid 3 years ago 2
I can't get over the tempo of this rendition. It's so different from what I'm used to. Nowadays, it's played almost frantically by comparison. This almost sounds too slow though there is a certain something that gives it an enormous appeal. Perhaps, it is that this man was playing a piece written in his life time by a man he knew well and not one written in the past by a stranger known only by music and reputation..
philomelodia 3 years ago
Well, the recording is a little pitched down, which also decreases the speed a bit. But I agree, today's musicians focus much more on speed and technique rather than on the music itself. In my opinion, giving music to people is much better than just "showing-off". But even today's public is carefully following violinists for technical "stunts", which is a sign of how different our times are, in comparision to maybe 70-100 years ago.
GeorgeEnescu 3 years ago 8
"[Joachim] is also considered to be the first violinist to have recorded (1903)."
Sarasate made some cylinder recordings in 1899.
robotnik77 3 years ago
Extraordinary :)
mehdigoudarzi 3 years ago
This is so wonderful. Delicious tone and insane rhythms.
litereeder 3 years ago
Remarkable! TY
paulostroff99 3 years ago
A-440 was not adopted as the "standard" until 1920. Before that it was around 435hg.
arthurkrieck 3 years ago
Amazing to hear this type of playing so diff from the vibrato adn portamento We al think r old fashioned.I must find Auer's playing.Then HeifetzElman Milsteinpushed this russian school out into prominence. Sarasate andYsaye left rec .Must hear!
lovesGenet 3 years ago
I think you can find both on youtube. I know you can find Sarasate. His style sounds very different than Joachim's though. Much more precise and less ornamented. Perhaps, it's more accurate to say that his ornamentation is just different.
philomelodia 3 years ago
If only I liked Brahms...
znanto 3 years ago
Do you the year this was recorded? Could it be Brahms on the piano?
violin523 4 years ago
No. Brahms died in 1897.
gbarnardoh 3 years ago
thanks a lot!! so great to listen to this!!
i didnt know that there is a recording. this is really a step in old times. funny ornamentation. sounds sometimes like a yiddish way of playing. strange glissandi. thanks!
martin12tut 4 years ago
Not surprising his style would have a Yiddish flavor. He was born a Jew, you know. He also studied with Mendelsohn who was another converted Jew. I'm really excited about hearing this. It reminds me of noone more than Jascha Heifetz. I love the glisandi. Almost makes the violin sound human. Wish more modern players did this. Of ocurse, with the music written these days, they don't relaly have cause to truly make their instrument sing like that.
philomelodia 3 years ago
i thought the same. i have recordings from jewish violinists played in 1910 to 1925. similar attitude. nice. not much vibrato with many glissandi. sounds far a bit like synagogal singing. and this strange tempo changings...
martin12tut 3 years ago
ahh, now i saw that i wrote this before...sorry :)
martin12tut 3 years ago
Amazig to be able to hear this sound. coming from another time... The quality is poor, but what i still cannot figure ow big an heritage this is for mankind.. That sound was produced by a guy born in 1830... same year
Ave88 4 years ago
Thank you for posting this. I had heard it on the radio a couple of times, and it's good to find it here!
20fragra07 4 years ago
Did you guys know there's a recording of Leopold Auer playing this? It's interesting to listen to the lineage: Joachim was Auer's Teacher. and Auer was Heifetz's teacher. They all have recordings of this piece. The best by far is Heifetz, then Joachim, then Auer.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
Is there a recording of Heifetz or Auer playing this on YouTube?
ztefieh 4 years ago
No unfortunately
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
there is, since two weeks ago, just look at my page
pochetta1 3 years ago
My God. THIS is what all of our technology and gadgetry should be about. THANKS!
Deutschlieber 4 years ago
¡Magnífico que nos hicieras escuchar al gran Joachim! -- Wonderful post!
osverol 4 years ago 2
great post -thank you
maxinDetroit 4 years ago
agree
hemplar 4 years ago
Is it just me or is his G string tuned down to F?
Jextxadore 4 years ago
no, it sounds like f# but i don't know whether he did it himself or if it was the recording
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
It's the gut strings he used; they sound different. I tried playing along with him on the first few bars with a properly tuned violin, steel strings, and the notes match perfectly.
Jextxadore 4 years ago
Lol what are you talking about? That's nonsense, just because he's using gut strings doesn't mean that the pitch is going to be any different, afterall, Sarasate's recordings were up to pitch. It was probably just the recording technology or Joachim's own choice, afterall the Bach recording is a quartertone flate
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
No, I mean the gut strings sound different and sometimes this causes a confusion over the notes - also depends on what he used to record
Jextxadore 4 years ago
*flat
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
wow, what an interpretation. Great stuff! :D
HadeanAgent 4 years ago
Only TWO Ungarian Dances are aktionliy from Brahms...everybody äls not! ...yeah biatch...but im anyway a big brahms fan
aaabbbccc5 4 years ago
This is absoutely amazing... what a revelation to finally hear Joachim!
davidapowell 4 years ago
how good it is to hear this recording; his playing belies his age
apollodionysus7 4 years ago
If on google you search "joseph joachim recording" and click on the first result it pulls up a very interesting article. Towards the end of the article it discusses the difference between modern day interpretation and 19th century interpretation and the significance of Joachim's recordings.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
I still can't get over how great his portamento is
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
i cant tell you how wonderful it is to finally hear the man who influenced and was involved with the violin works of brahms, and schumann and basically single handedly revived the beethoven concerto, i try to imagine what the violin repertiore would have been like without him, not to mention the hungarian violin concerto he wrote is wonderful
scottbos68 4 years ago
loveee this song =)
xdyingxwithoutx 4 years ago
this is a wonderful melody love it !
Vampiresucksblood 4 years ago
They say he didn't use much vibrato if any. I think this recording shows that.
oldjarhead 4 years ago
This a masterful rendering of the piece. The phrasing is so perfect for the style, and shows the freedom that Brahms must have expected with his rhythms. What a wonderful violinist. (Of course the technique isn't as good as Gil Shaham or Heifetz. Get over it.)
kopp1981 4 years ago
How do you know his technique isn't as good? After all, he was the first to premier the Brahms violin concerto - and without complaint. It's hard to tell from the few recordings he made how good his technique is, especially since he was about 73 when he made this recording
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago 2
that is a great comment thank you
jimmy90292 4 years ago
(continued) I can only imagine how he played in his youth! As for Sarasate, that may be why you guys think his technique is a little lacking, these guys were so old when they made these recordings that they obviously won't play as well as they did when they were younger. I can only imagine how Paganini must've sounded
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
Man, I can't stop listening to this. Despite the fact that there's barely any vibrato if any, and despite the crappy 1904 sound quality, his playing is so intense and fiery. His portamento sounds greater than even that of Kreisler or Heifetz. What's even more amazing is that this recording was made when he was 73!.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
Is the original Hungarian Dance no.1 in f# minor? Joachim plays this in f# minor, i'm not sure if it's the recording or he actually tuned his violin down.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
Your ears are completely right, but todays "A" is 442-443 and this is the reason. About thirty years ago it was 440 and the year of 1900 even less. During these hundred years it makes it a small second interval (I'm not sure how to put in English), thus f# instead of todays g-minor. I hope, my explanation is clear.
And I hope, the "A" now will stay like it is!
arielpesach 4 years ago
Are you sure about that? I know in the baroque/classical era they tuned to A-415 but if you listen to Sarasate's Gypsy Airs (which was recorded along with Joachim's hungarian dance) it is in c minor, and the notes are up to today's tuning, if not then very close to it.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
AbsoluteZ3R0, I can't find any other explanation.
The transcription made by Joachim himself is in g-minor.
But, sometimes, I wonder what they do with the old recordings, while transferring them to CD. Yesterday I've heard Fritz Kreisler playing the Beethoven concerto with Sir John Barbirolli from 1935. Wonderful, and it was todays D major, but it should be in a lower D than today at least.
One thing is absolutely sure, though.
What a great musician Joseph Joachim was!
arielpesach 4 years ago
A440 wasn't adopted as a standard until 1955. Before that, the A was whatever people felt it should be at the time... and you can imagine that it would be different in different parts of the world with no telephones, recordings, or anything to bridge the distance between places. Which is why today's "historically informed" practice of making A415 standard for Baroque performances is a little absurd. There may have very well been performances back then where the A was tuned closer to 440.
tiredarms 4 years ago
If that's tre then how come most recordings from the early 20th century are relatively at A-440 if not give or take a couple hertz? Where did you learn that? Was it in an article of some sort? Because if so I want to read it
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
The International Organization for Standardization.
The 'A440' article on Wikipedia has a little more detail.
tiredarms 3 years ago
HIP is in part based on such mechanical evidence as they can find - old organ pipes, etc.
gvvt 2 years ago
My late father who died aged 90 in 2002, told me that his great great grandfather actually went and heard Paganini in Dublin Ireland. Apparently he was mistified that Paganini didn't " sound like a normal fiddler". Those were his words. Of course he was amazed at Paganini.
cattleman6420012000 5 years ago
cattleman, your grandfather's great grandfather was a lucky man...
pppsssssssss 4 years ago
He certainly was extremely lucky to have heard Paganini, even though concerts would have been so different in those days.I remember my late father telling me what he had been told about it.
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
And yet Joachim was regarded in his time as being the best violinist the world had seen-yes,even better than Paganini. Paginini,it should be remembered actively encouraged the'cult of personality' surrounding him ,wheras Joachim was interested only in being a servant of the music.
shiveringflower 2 years ago 3
Thank you very much. Actually Sarasate himself plays much worse than most of the modern soloists in intonation and clearity. But Joachim brought tears to my eyes in this piece :)
dostc 5 years ago
You have to remember that things were different back then. It didn't matter so much to make mistakes or play notes out of tune. The fact is that Sarasate was one of the greatest violinists of the 19th century, regardless of how many mistakes he made. But you are right, his technique could use a little work... :)
aimson 5 years ago
As a composer, yes he is one of the greatest, but as a violinist, as you also see, not so good :) I expected something much better than Ysaye or Joachim or Perlman or Heifetz. I hope that Paganini is not like this :)
dostc 5 years ago
Yeah, even in this crappy recording it still sounds great lol. If Joachim had been born more recently I'm sure he would've rivaled Heifetz and the other great virtuosos of the 20th century.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
Thanks so much for letting us hear this.
cattleman6420012000 5 years ago
You're very welcome. Thanks for enjoying it! I think more people need to be exposed to more music, especially the older generation of violinists. I only wish I had more video to share (I do, but can't figure out a way to rip it!)
aimson 5 years ago
smile
scottbos68 5 years ago
Wow thanks. I also have wondered what Joachim sounded like. Didn't Brahms have a close relationship with him- with some ups and downs?
mimfri 5 years ago
Yeah, Brahms was considered one of Joachim's colleagues, along with Max Bruch and Franz Liszt and Robert Schumann. I'm not sure he had many downs with Brahms but I do know he and Liszt had some pretty hot arguments later in Joachim's life.
aimson 5 years ago
Joachim was angry with Brahms. The Double Concerto was an effort at appeasement on Brahms' part. The funny part was that it gave much more prominence to the cello than to the violin. Thanks again for posting this rare audio!
mimfri 5 years ago
Brahms definetely had a close relationship with Joachim. His violin Concerto is dedicated to Joachim after all...and it's widely noted that Brahms' original violin concerto was cut down by joachim who insisted on making changes (which brahms listended and followed)
sofly09 4 years ago