Added: 2 years ago
From: majora123456987
Views: 76,780
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (320)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is real. Scientists have analyzed it and it is a female sasquatch(it's breasts) and its muscle movements were legitimate. Also, people tend to forget that gorillas and panda bears were thought to be fake and hoaxes until the past hundred so years.

  • Its Chewbacca visiting us :D

  • Patterson claimed the original footage was "lost". The camera used was also lost and patterson claimed not to remember which film speed setting he used. How convienent.

  • I wish I could watch the original footage without editing or zooming or music, just the raw footage.

  • What does Bigfoot and an intelligent blonde have in common? They both don't exist.

  • This guy chased this squirrel into a marshy area, kept going after it until he came to this clearing. There was a lean-to of branches and whatever, with all this matted hair and a nasty smell. He said, "A bear lives here." and took off out of there. What a shame but he was just a kid at the time and he says now, "What are you, stupid?" lol. My mom said when she was a teen, if a car was coming along the road, she would jump into the bushes and watch it pass; its too easy not to be spotted.

  • Gigantopithecus blacki is extinct. This is a man with a lot of time on his hands and a costume.

  • umm a gorilla with great posture???? idk

  • Comment removed

  • omg the world gone bananas Earth=bigfoot,Area 51=aliens Minecraft=herobrine

  • hmm bigfoot this look kind of real but we only know thereis only male bigfoot

  • they didnt have flexable gorilla suits back then when this video was out so people who say its a hoax are wrong

  • Crazyhorse---youre gullible is what it is. No real animal here just a gullible public willing to believe tripe. PT Barnum made several fortunes from gullible yokels.

  • The loon is you, gullible eminbozo. You'll be in the history books one day when debating the world's most scared geeks, you're already in the dictionary under 'denial'. lol

  • Lloyd pye - human orgins

  • @eminboztepe i think the pg film is real but you are right,lloyd pie is a loon

  • The more "Hoax" films I see, the more I am convinced this is real. Other than the "Snow Walker" hoax nothing has even come remotely close to this film.

  • Real Hoax Footage!

  • @BigHoaxFoot sorry wrong,real bigfoot footage

  • @SuperTestfreak The burden of proof is on you. Your hypothesis is that this is an elusive undiscovered animal. You now need to come up with some Freaky Super Testing for your hypothesis that is reliable and repeatable.

  • Cut your losing crap, eminaidiot. lol Geekess, heh.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #793 komododidiot. Ken Peterson? LOL. Geek. heh

  • @eminboztepe Dodge # 3763. eminaidiot. Andre the Giant? Geekess.

  • Seymoures crazy! It's never been proven a hoax can't you understand that! When I see film of Santa flying around in 1967 a time when technology was barely out of the stone age and such, and they didn't have the technology to make a believable Santa or flying reindeer then we can prove Santa a hoax. It's just that simple. Maybe he really is out there, maybe he employs Bogfoot at his workshop, maybe he stays there, their buddies, who knows. They can prove the moon landing was a hoax why not PGF?

  • Fake!!! U would think the camera man would run to follow it since the two people who took the video went there to look for big foot

  • this video cracks em up

  • But you're the one believing in monsters, sewerblop, you are. It's only to the likes of you Sasquatch is fantasy. It's really only a monster to geeks and the movie/tabloid industry, it's about to become a real species to science. Got that crow plate ready yet? lol Or start with that list you promised others.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #760 komodidiot. Ken Stevenson? I'm still waiting for your answer you geek, lol.

  • @eminboztepe Dodge # 3552 eminaidiot. Who? Keep waiting, geekess. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #763 komodoidiot. Ken Peterson?  Recreation? Geek. lol

  • @eminboztepe Dodge # 3774 eminaidiot. Andre the Giant? Recreation? Geekess. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #775 komodidiot. Ken Peterson? Recreation? lol

    Geek.

  • So you change what I said put quotations around it and pretend I said it when just below all can see my actual post. Are you that dumb? Of course you are. People who believe in monsters aren't too intelligent about other things either.

  • Killers pass tests, big deal. If you're psychotic enough U can pass (too). There was no PGF hoax, only hoax is the so-called 'confession' which is nothing but laughable Yakima jealousy. Again, big deal made out of nothing. Patty's anatomy/build and proportions conclusively prove she's a genuine Sasquatch, her upper body's too tall and this fact totally crushes all unaware Hollywood myth there ever was a suit. It's only desperate geeks not in the know buying the suit lie anymore, dreamers y'know.

  • Learn how to hold a camera

  • @iJERKxSoFrEsH he didnt make thunder head

  • We know your madness is severe, sewer, why do you insist on reminding the world of so much human tragedy and sadness daily? You want to balance that medication better, you hear.

  • You don't prove things hoaxes. The person making the claim its real has to prove it. Using your logic Santa is real because no one has proven him a hoax. No one has proven lephracauns or unicorns aren't real either.

  • @seymourbbest wow, youre a retard with retard logic. "you cant prove santa claus isnt real because you cant prove he's fake." ummmm, yeah youre a retard

  • Yeti is doing march-fast lol...

  • I used to think this footage of Bigfoot was fake until I really started to look closely at it. You can see its leg muscle quiver as it takes a step. Another thing that gets me is that this bigfoot is female. When someone decides to film a fake bigfoot vid, especially in the 60s, why in the hell would they choose to make it a female seeing that would take more work on the suit. This may very well be fake I don't think we'll ever know but IMO this is the real deal.

  • Comment removed

  • The walk always surprises people, it's so humanlike and then again not quite, so many assume it's fake. The fakes you can easily tell, they're all over YT, but Patty's gait here is actually natural in every mechanism. She steps down with great weight in big strides, no knee lock. The typical BF walk, it can't be recreated in a suit, everything on the body's too complicated for that, which is obviously why attemps have never been successful. Even today they have trouble with BF suits in movies.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    More babblin' bullshit from you? LOL. Of course. And that makes dodge #698.

    Geek

  • Hah, more bad lies from bbest. Show us those recreations, please. Of course you won't, you'll just type some new ignorant gibberish.

  • Its been recreated several times. If the recreations don't meet your approval then that's tough I guess.

  • @seymourbbest Recreated how? Don't even tell me you believe the BBC remake resembled this footage because thats just blatant bullshit. Also, if you believe Bob H's babble then I'm sorry my friend, but your ignorance is over running the true reality that you see in this film. I see your name on all the bigfoot videos saying how they are all fake. Well my friend I do agree with you that some of them are probably fake, but the Patterson film has yet to be proven a hoax because its not

  • @F350With460engine

    The BBC didn't try to remake the suit. It was an APE suit grabbed by John Vulich that was hanging up at OPTIC NERVE.

    Why you morons continue to promote this stupid rumor is comical.

  • @eminboztepe Well I didn't read into the backstory, plus like I give a shit about the suit that was completely irrelevant to the point I was trying to make.

  • @F350With460engine

    Just correcting you.  And before you dismiss Bob Heironimus remember that Roger's brother in law, Al DeAtley, confirmed Bob's involvement in the hoax. DeAtley is the one who profited and produced the film to get his paving company out of the red. Bob's timeline of events actually fit the facts, unlike Patterson's and Gimlin's BS. Funny how Bob Heironimus willingly took two polygraphs and passed and yet Gimlin refuses to take one.

  • Hah, many people. Like Blevins, eh? I love how seyey doesn't even realize he's a bigfooter himself. lol I also love the denial and ignorance on football pads. Guys, it's impossible when you can't even reach that high. Her legs prove this. -They're right there in full view, not only do they not match a person's, the longer top body conclusively prove her a real being. Meaning she's very likely in the 7ft range, and a person would be unable to reach any mask. Sorry folks, but most now know this.

  • Good point musk---yeah those eyes are as fake. Easy to spot. Unless you're a bigfooter-then you make up a "fact" about how bigfoot can recess its eyes back into its head in the daylight or some crap like that.

  • Many people have recreated this video with a cheap 60's era ape suit-for the feet,use big plywood cut-outs. [you can see in the Patterson video sharp edges sliding around the heels] Old 1940's style football helmets provide the head crest like a mountain gorilla [and 6 inches of height] and ordinary football pads round out the costume-until they start to slip,as can be seen in the legs and ass near the end. Also,the eyes are never visible-recessed like behind a mask-dead giveaway.

  • @muskratist show one person who has recreated this footage whith 1960s tech and i will give you $10,000

  • I still saz itţs a costume. It's just a theory

  • Good point about that new chimp, yes.

  • They just found a new species of chimpanzee in the Congo last month that is more related to Gorillas but has the diet of a Chimp...Something the locals frequently talked about but the Chimp was elusive and described as a myth. Why cant the same be true in the evergreen forests of NA and Asia? Bigfoot is real and this one is real.

  • People are gunna have their own opinion, Me, personally believe in Bigfoot, but I'm not here to argue with non-believers

  • thats a hoax

  • i came here because i was watching Elf the movie and will ferrero (dnt know how to spell his name) was walking in central park just like that :D

  • @blackprmatrix they have proved this is real bigfoot in such ways as looking at the muscle movment in his thy it wasnt in a suit and you can see its a femal 7-8ish foot tall and has boobs or it can be a hariy chick walking in california creeks

  • I don't know about this video. Why would they fake a female bigfoot? You can see the boobies at :10 to :13 seconds.

  • Can you prove stories of Santa fake? Can you prove werewolves don't exist?

  • @seymourbbest Werewolves are real u dumbass

  • Has anybody ever been able to prove this is fake? And why have attempts at duplicating it come up looking nothing like it?

  • @jerseyirish it has to either be bigfoot or a gorrila who learned how to walk on 2 legs. this could'nt have been a costume, you can see the muscles when it walks. NO ONE could make a costume in that much detail. proffesionals tried to make a costume like it and failed. its walking very natural too, no human would be able to walk like that and not trip with all those rocks on the ground. i think its a real animal.

  • Comment removed

  • this is all just one big hoax. This ia all for interest in money. Same with the loch ness monster. FAKE!!!!! I have to hand it to all the noobs that film fake vids. They make it look so real that the whole country is behind them.

  • Rock----Limited soils to preserve tracks of bigfoot? Haha not many soils that WOULDN'T preserve the tracks of a 600 lb animal. How many more special rules are you gonna come up with that only applies to bigfoot? Experienced trackers can detect BIRD tracks in soil but Bigfoot tracks take special soil before it can be seen? Haha riiiiight.

  • @seymourbbest Seemorebutts: Frost action, bioturbation, rain, vegetation cover, and excessive shear strength of soils will either disallow footprints or destroy them quickly. And weak or soft (low shear strength soils) are also prone to "fluffing" back to unrecognizable as prints. You have to be in the right place at the right time. Even river environments are not always good, especially for too long.

  • dude idk but half the shit on youtube is so fake its pissing me off

  • And researchers like John Green saw 100s of tracks in his time, where did they come from? Something made them, but it wasn't boots or a machine as there'd been signs of that, they showed foot flexibility. Plus skeptic pretenders aren't considering the reasons for trail cams, security cams, military ditto in the first place - it is not to catch BFs. They likely have but why should they tell you/us, it's simply not considered good for their business there, that's sort of their thinking probably.

  • Yep all those scared shaky security cams and trail cams just capture regular apes AND BUTTERFLIES but no bigfoot.

  • If these idiots focused on the real bigfoots, all our great apes which are on the verge of extinction, maybe something good would come of their efforts. But no ,they rather run and catch butterflies.........stupid moronic, sick bastards.

  • An elusive smart fast being, bad cameras and shaky human hands over the years not even carried by all visitors to the wilderness anyway. That's the history of cameras for you, right there. You think a lot of time has passed too, it hasn't really. There's your answer again, and don't pretend you'd believe the snapshot anyway.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer Add also the fact that there is a lack of people to study them, a lack of shear numbers of sasquatch, limited soils to preserve footprints, limited time for footprints to be preserved, lack of insight to recognize evidence, lack of preservation of bones due to many factors, lack of good methods and equipment to locate them, and lack of human population where they exist.

  • Well put RcUni----youll know no one answered your point that deep sea creatures have been photographed but and 8 foot tall monster roaming the USA can't be. Rock made his usual smart ass reply without addressing the point.

  • I am scouting youtube for potential FBI employees and I think that I found one in RcUniverseGuy.

  • Well, you're as delusional a guy as nastykid0 there so here's some sympathy for you.

  • Troll out in force with not a single ounce of proof ..this is nothing more thn a man in a monkey suit. You thick trolls

  • @nastymonsters2 Why so skeptic? They have tried out to re-model the ''suit'' but none could have do it...

  • @thepunisher236169 watch defoots footage of his suit. He's well known in rhe business

  • It's fake as hell dude.. Nobody attempted a remodel... Maybe some shitty tv show but nobody in hollywood did.. The suit is not complicated like they show in all these tv shows that say theres muscles moving under the skin and shit.. where?? i don't see it.. its all tv bullshit to keep the viewer watching. bigfoot shows make money.. so if they debunk them theres no more money. =(... Bob heironimus was the man in the suit.. and phil morris made the suit..

  • @RcUniverseGuy may be but im not that skeptic... But just to know i watched it on History channel

  • Peado with his usual two thumbs up to himself ..you dickless jobless faggot. Post one. Single real piece. This is a msn in a suit you dumb geek.

  • looks more like a gorilla for me

  • You're fighting a losing battle, we already know they exist. Scott Nelson, retired US Navy linguist/code cracking expert of 30 years experience, determines the Morehead/Berry recordings from the 70s are not fakes but actual language. -Not human language as we know it, but BF human language so to speak. Check out his presentations, might open your dull eyes a bit. Whether you do or not doesn't really matter, it's all coming out eventually. Probably sooner than the field thought just 10 years ago.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer you stupid fuck we know they already exist......no they do not..yr after yr you spout the same shite..well post your one piece of proof then dickhead..you talk utter shite post after post..bf language lol.stfu..

  • @nastymonsters2 Yes, they do now get lost with your trolling.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer no they dnt paedo .post one scrap of proof. Get a fuckin clue you jobless CUNT..

  • @nastymonsters2 Yes, they do my little moronic troll, only you're about the dumbest git yet so unfortunately you don't even know that. If you'd been paying attention, or interested in it even, you'd check out some of the things mentioned here. But you prove you're trolling by not, so fuck off. lol

  • @reclaimerReclaimer post one piece. Of proof peado you cnt you thick clueless CUNT. You cnt there not real you troll

  • @reclaimerReclaimer theres no proof and there never will be cause they are as fake as this fucking video of Bob heironimus walking around in a fucking cheap ass monkey suit... We have footage of creatures you have to travel far and wide to find.. to the ends of the earth so to speak. Even insects that you cannot see with the naked eye... and deep sea creatures... you honestly think this 8 foot tall creature that live in my backyard has yet to be photographed? wow dude.

  • Grover Krantz in his book "big footprints" says roger patterson showed him a step by step process by which to fake a bigfoot track. The obvious question is if bigfoot were real why would a professional bigfoot hunter,as its been claimed patterson was,have a need to develop a way to fake bigfoot prints?

  • Thing is, we could see some new unbias non-Bigfoot related scientist presenting a Bigfoot bone to the public, the skeptics still wouldn't accept it because now that scientist is pro-BF and joins the Meldrums, Bindernagels, etc. And our delusional friends won't have that. They'd still not consider Patty could be real, even when we know the species is real, take that new DNA reveal possibly coming shortly. They won't believe that either, to them people still must be seeing elves, unicorns, etc.

  • Paul pattterson !! are you 6 years old ..do some research No offense

  • If spamming pleases you, you're the only who cares enough. lol We'll remind you of all those Bigfoot movie suits, shall we. You can't mention a single one, and yet you claim your hoax bullshit. Take a look at any late Bigfoot flick, you'll see where we still are in f/x technique. No wait, you'll just dodge the facts again and overlook this critical point proving you're the geeky dummy.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer Year 2024 Dodge #124,000 , ''I don't care if they have found bigfoot It's still fake read Greg (Jesus Christ) long's e-book totally proves it is real..i mean fake '''

  • Dodge #503 komodidiot aka reclaimer

    You can keep dodging and I'll keep reminding you.

    Geek

  • He does yes, same obsessive suit nonsense 24/7. lol

  • Dodge #501 komodidiot aka reclaimer

  • Hah, so eminbob read Long's trash book, bet that's where all the insane belief comes from. Some guys will believe anything, like the man who thought he saw Kennedy's driver pull a gun and shoot JFK. There's always a new sucker born who'll think he just invented the wheel.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer seriously this Dodge thing is the sadist thing i have ever seen on youtube ...does this guy live in his basement ?...Damn he needs air LOL

  • so fake he's taking a stroll

  • Guy in costume

  • @eminboztepe , i read in an article that bobs brother , howard heironimus , refused to be interviewed by greg long ? and also that howard once lived with the pattersons..did you know that hunny bun

  • @Jrld11

    Wrong, sugar. Try reading the book instead of getting your info from bigfoot websites.

  • the funny thing is that it looks real

  • He´s like "Dude are you fucking serious i can´t even go to Mc Donalds without some fuck face filming me.. You guys ar.... You know what i´m just gonna go home and see what my fucking wife made, I´m done with this bullshit. Really how would you like it if people where looking for you 24/7 just to make money?. You would feel so fucking annoy... Wait why am i even here i´m going home you guys are all assholes."

  • he looks like burt reynolds

  • It's saying "Christ! You can't even take a shit without some fucker wanting to put it on Youtube".

  • @eminboztepe , who did they tell this to ? over to you daisy chain

  • @Jrld11

    Greg Long, baby cakes. Don't forget Jerry Merritt confirmed this as well. All conversations were tape recorded.

  • @eminboztepe kal korff a major part of " the making of bigfoot"has said that greg long is a fraud.

  • @SuperTestfreak

    Wrong. Try again.

  • @eminboztepe , wheres the proof that the photo was at bluff creek ? over to you honey

  • @Jrld11

    It was a confirmed by John Ballard and Howard Heironimus.

    Back to you sugar.

  • @eminboztepe , that wasnt shot the same day as the footage and wasnt shot at the sight of the patty encounter... over to you sweetie

  • @Jrld11

    Who said anything about it being the same day? You claimed he wasn't a Bluff Creek.

    He was. The film proves it.

    Back over to you hun...

  • i figured out how a bigfoot happen there has to be a female or male human who has big feet who has sex with gorilla male or female depending on gender or its kingkong who gave birth

  • is just a hairy guy in the forest leave him alone

  • @jarrod1685 , where is your proof that this is fake , damn stupid statement considering it hasnt been proven a fake..no one can re create this supposed suit , bob heironimus has been caught bullshitting his story , look into it and its obvious he wasnt in bluff creek..please dont tell me youre another dumb shit like seymour ?

  • @Jrld11

    He wasn't at Bluff Creek, eh? Then why is he is in REEL TWO of the film? LOL

    Care to try again?

  • Jarrod---youre asking bigfooters for proof! That's like asking dracula to take a walk out in the sunlight with you.

  • this was a hoax,some dudes on horseback set this up in the 70's,iv'e seen the doco on it.

  • @jarrod1685 Give me a break, you can't even get the year right.

  • @511marko what year was it then smart arse

  • @jarrod1685 I was a kid when this came out so i remember. Do you really need someone to tell you that ?

  • @511marko why u being a smart arse cunt?i didnt give a exact date i said in the 70's,you tell me the correct year you old wanker.get a life and stop correcting ppl on the internet.

  • @jarrod1685 Your just a smartass punk.

  • @511marko Your the thats Gullible bye the way.

  • @jarrod1685 And if your watching youtube videos claiming it is a hoax your getting nothing but BS from idiots that know almost nothing about this. So go get some real info off some of the researcher web sites.

  • @511marko its not real u ignorant fool,its been dismissed as a hoax for years now,stop being so gulable.

  • Comment removed

  • @jarrod1685 I know more about this stuff than you know about women i would bet.

  • @511marko yeah and the sad thing is u believe it.

  • @jarrod1685 no the sad thing is your never going to be able to handle the reality of it. Like I've said before I've heard them and I've seen them, I KNOW they are REAL and if that tweeks your little brain i feel sorry for you.

  • @511marko wheres the real evidence?there is none,if can tell me a site to and make me believe we might not be having this argument

  • Yes, and think of the enormous cost of rewriting history it'd be, if the truth became general public knowledge. Incredible sums. All these 'strange' subjects that authorities, whether political leaders or religious, don't want you to know about. Anything that can threaten their power, be it UFOs or even just another primate (ape or human) like the Sasquatch. The whole idea freaks them out, and rocking the boat too much is the last thing they want to do these days, in a sea already very uneasy.

  • I offends them that they can't understand it themselves, it's actually their own stupidity that offends them the most. And they also lack the will to get it in the first place, that's another vital reason why they act up. It clashes with everything they've been told over time, and if there's one thing people don't like, it's being proven wrong and told they were duped by mass media tabloids and authorities. That's our denying old worlders in a nutshell, marko.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer I think they see it as a threat somehow. The Bigfoot mystery is a minor mystery. There are so many mysteries around the world that challenge our written history we were taught in school. If they really want to get freaked out they should look into things like Markawasi's Plateau, The Zone of Silence in Mexico or even the Nazca lines. And those are just a few. There are many mysteries that would suggest mans history is a lot more complicated than we know.

  • Besides PGF, I can point to other pieces of bigfootage undoubtedly showing the real thing; Marble Mountain (a 2000 video), Paul Freeman's video, Harlan Ford's 1963 Lousiana film predating PGF by 4 years. And what do they all have in common, what do they not share with Hollywood's big budgets? Realistic movements foremost & shapes. Even cheap 16mm Hollywood stuff can't cut it against Patty & friends, movements & shapes give those away as fakes. PGF's real, period. Which is why deniers still rant.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer lol you posting from a psych ward? Santa Claus is stuck in my chimney right now...

  • eminbozo's biggest excuse of them all, the Kodachrome rant, stock has zero to do with movement. They're all lame excuses and false of course, but this is the dumbest and weirdest of them all. I can see why some ignorant fool would believe in football helmets and shoulder pads, wrong and undoable as they are due to human vs. BF anatomy, but to say Patty moves like she does because of the stock is beyond insanity. Then all BF movies should take advantage of it, but they're not.

  • My shyster buddies? Who the hell would that be? And besides who makes money by saying bigfoot DOESN'T exist? Its the scammers like meldrum moneymaker biscardi etc that delude you poor saps into buying their books and dvds etc without a single shred of scientific evidence to back up their bigfoot claims.

  • @seymourbbest I see, its ok for your shyster buddies to make money off this stuff but as soon as a legitimate researcher tries recouping some money for what he's invested, then you scream HOAX. And the only thing he's proven is he's the one thats full of it.

  • @511marko Oh there are plenty of skeptic mags and journalists and web sites who probably have made more money off of the Patterson film than any of us even know. And then theres the fact that alot of people have experienced them themselves and want to learn more. I know because I'm one of them. I KNOW they are real. And why you get offended by people being inquisitive about this makes no sense. You can believe what you want but you don't need to come on here calling people stupid.

  • This was 44 yrs ago ...I still cant see any unfilled space in the bigfoot suit. this Animal is very real. Have you seen anything better? I mean 44yrs ago and there`s nothen like it. no film but roger`s! Why?

  • This was 44 yrs ago ...I still cant see any unfilled space in the bigfoot suit. this Animal is very real.

  • Real.

  • No one has recreated the flying monkeys from the 1939 Wizard of Oz so therefore ,using bigfooter logic,they must be real also.

  • i believe u !

  • its jimmy hoffa

  • Yeah, we sure fell for Patty, she's the real deal alright.

  • It sure as hell is the same old bs from you, eminbozo. You've just admitted today there's nothing that can make you change your mind, that leaves the question, why you're so dumb to think anyone here would change theirs after reading your daily lying PGF crap. You're wasting your time and life, lady, better save that lipstick for yourself. lol And bobH, he's never been able to substantiate and prove anything he's said, ever. All staged Christian TV (Pax) babble polys, religious geeks the lot.

  • @reclaimerReclaimer

    Dodge #306 komodoidiot aka reclaimer

    Ken Peterson a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?

    Back up your claims you geek.