i cant believe that planned parenthood is forcing black women to have their children to be aborted which makes way more sense than a proportionately higher amount of black women deciding to get abortions.
For all the dumb Black people out there considering voting for Obama a second time,you should know that he supports PP whole heartedly. While you are busy loving him...he does not seem to feel the same about you. I warned Blacks the first time and i will again....stop looking at his skin color and you will see the man has very low morals and/or values. Obama is working for demons behind the scenes who wants to kill off the Black pop and Obama is helping them achieve this goal. Wake up Black ppl.
@DaOrigTruthSeeker I dont look at Obama's race, I look at his IQ and compare that to the Republicans running for president. And I realize Obama is more centered.
@MarkCox73 You're absolutely right. The percentage of abortions of black children, however, is disproportionate to the percentage of black people nationwide. The video is simply pointing out that blacks are targeted more than other races. But I completely agree that all children must be spared from abortion regardless of skin color, as all of them are precious!
@yellowkrux Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics tend to be built in areas populated by minorities and underpriveleged areas because the idea is that these women are more likely to find themselves in crisis pregnancy situations. Thus, when faced with an unplanned pregnancy, the solution is right around the corner. Obviously there are Planned Parenthoods in middle class areas as well, but they tend to be more dominant in low-income neighborhoods.
@impasse0124 Nothings ever needed, even if the procedure is necessary to save someones life it is not needed unless you desire a certain outcome. So you're sticking with the targeted by placing them where they are most likely to be used?
@yellowkrux Let me put it this way: Planned Parenthood has repeatedly made the claim that they want to reduce abortions in this country, yet it is a well-known fact that the majority of their income from services they provide can be narrowed down to abortions. They see these low-income neighborhoods and know that they've hit the jackpot. They don't care about reducing abortions; they simply want to make money. They've taken donations from those who specifically want black abortions.
@impasse0124 Okay, well see here's the problem, you're stupid. If they subsidized abortions or provided them at cost you retards would be saying the same damned thing (only you'd be right), so they charge for abortions (they usually refer people to other providers for abortions but whatever), & the fact that they subsidize contraception which has been shown to reduce the abortion rate gets ignored. Not to mention it's a NPO. & Money from racists spends no different. So yeah you're full of it.
@yellowkrux Well I'm not going to have a discussion with someone who sums it up by saying "You're stupid". I didn't treat you with that contempt and if that's the way you feel, nothing I say will even be given fair consideration by you. Have a nice day.
@impasse0124 Yes, you treated me with contempt when you decided to insult my intellect. You literally argued that since PP engages in steps to reduce abortions, that means they want to increase abortions & that it's a bad origination because it took money from someone who is a racist. If you actually expected any thinking person to not think you are stupid after that, you're also arrogant. Oh & you're also a cry baby.
@IHavAUTubeSadly Tax dollars do not fund abortions, they do fund welfare and if PP is defunded leaving many poor women, minority women, unable to afford to pay for reproductive health services, welfare costs will increase.
@07Haley31 Murder is murder,,,if you don't abort, a baby is born...!! so its still KILLING another human soul!! there are many childless couples who would love to adopt these babies
@peacechild61 No there are not plenty of people who are willing to adopt minority children. There are folks standing in line to adopt healthy, white infants but not minority children. And adopting out a child is not part of the culture of African-American's -- they'll keep the child or give it to a relative to raise. And yes it's about money, the money it takes to raise a child, the money for housing, food, clothes, medical care. That is always a part of the decision.
"We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population" Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, inspiration for Hitler's German Sterilization law as Nazi Doctor's were inspired by articles in the journal "Birth Control Review" which Sanger started. Planned Parenthood killed 330,000 babies last year with my taxpayer money. If family planning & birth control are private issues pay for it yourselves!
@216CERTIFIED Uncle Toms? Uncle Tom had enough sense NOT to suck up to the KKK in happy face aka PP. The only sellouts are the NAACP,etc that supports the KKK without the bed sheets ( PP), Why are hollywood celebrities that whine "Racism is evil" so quick to defend PP- founded by KKK woman, Maraget Sanger.
Either you can let the woman or girl have the abortion or you can not and the child ends up abused and put in an even worse situation. Even financially stable married woman don't take care of their kids that's when they mysteriously disappear and then you find out the mother did it. I've learned not to judge and to promote birth control to all woman and not the bullshit pill the implanon
yeah yeah...all Im gonna say is that I would rather see african babies being brought up by africans capable of raising children right than by those incapable of raising a child. Same goes for whites, hispanics and everyone else. We don't need more failures. let people do what they want...if they are going to burn for it, its their ass not yours
sorry, just because the receptionist agreed to "make a note" of the mans request to donate towards only black abortion, that does not mean that is how planned parenthood actually treats their abortions! they are not out to target any race! they are helping women who CHOOSE to have an abortion.
obviously the receptionist was sarcastic. A donation is a donation, and the man on the phone is only trying to entrap her to fuel the fire against abortion using racism.
This is dumb. Times have changed; some people still need to move on. I'm sure Planned Parenthood has gone passed the "blatant racism" it used to discreetly perceive. I'm black, and honestly, I'm all for Planned Parenthood. It's called that for a reason.
It is only a race issue if being stupid enough to get knocked up is limited to that race! It makes more sense for the clinics to be in those minority neighborhoods if that is where so much of the stupidity is occurring. With the exception of a few times when birth control failed, or in case of rape (which preg could be prevented there also) then there is no excuse for unwanted pregnancy. Either close your legs or get on proper birth control!
The White lady on the phone that was like, "Okay... whatever." Obviously sounded annoyed by that guys pretend racism. You can tell by her tone that she was either disgusted or thought it was a dumb joke.
These ppl are dumb btw. People CHOOSE to have abortions. Learn what the word genocide means b4 you go flinging it around. This is a Black man saying this
@hallobaaaby I already saw that on another video. They edited out some parts on that one to make the White lady sound bad. I'll look for the link lady, but the White woman on the phone sounded clearly annoyed. She just wanted to get of the phone with the dude as fast as she could. You could tell from her voice. However, the link you just sent edited that part out. Didn't you wonder why they didn't play it all the way thru. I'll look for the original vid and give it to you.
@GGLebo23 Yeah, there's clearly ideological manipulation going on from both sides. The main thing to me is that MAnger was a exuberant eugenicist and feverish racist. I was surprised to find that Bill Gates' father was director of the organisation too, and even more surprised to find Gates stating with blunt clarity that he likes the idea of reducing earth's population through...vaccines(i watched it many times in case i misunderstood).Then the 'georgia guidestones'.These r just sick fucks!tcare
Prove to me that planned parenthood deliberately kills fetus on every person, every black person that turns up pregnant i wonder why PP never sought to abort some of my cousins kids
oh yeah i have a sister on my fathers side who was barely raised by her own mother and lived with her she became pregnant at 15 and the other 14 PP did not show up at the hospital saying you should abort your child you freaks GTFOH with that
Why do we give our tax dollars to planned parenthood? They are still eugenic to this very day!!!!! They are located mainly in minority areas. And their whole agenda is to kill minorities.
Anti-choicer think we are so dumb as to believe this lie. They are just trying to recruit people and they are using all kinds of tricks. Race discrimination is one of this tricks.
NO ANTI-CHOICERS WE DONT BELIEVE YOUR LIES, PRO-CHOICERS FIGHT TO KEEP OUR WOMENS RIGHTS.
Just another Pro-Abortion blood-freak who gets off sexually by bashing children's skulls in. Your filthy beliefs are coming to an end. We will rip abortion out of our culture no matter how hard you kick and scream.
What the hell does the Y2K theory have to do with abortion? Its no wonder you support abortion, your "logic" shows that you were probably dropped on your head repeatedly as a child. Roe V Wade is a decision in blatant defiance of the Constitution, and it will not stand. Now shut up and go back to masturbating to pictures of murdered children, you godless pro-abortion baby-killer.
@Psalm119v50 Go and masturbate while reading your psalms 19v50 through the hell and the devil dwelling inside your fucking cunt or dick! and if you believe that abortion will be illegal in this country again you are as stupid and the people who believe that the end of the world was in the Y2K. Do you get it now IDIOT?
You know less about Scripture than you do about history. Abortion was legal in the US long before Roe V Wade, depending on the state. Roe defied the 10th amendment by stripping power from the states and giving it to the federal government. Let's see your baby-killer brain answer this: what in the Constitution gives you the right to kill an unborn baby? By the way, the House just voted to defund Planned Parenthood. Get your facts straight before you open your mouth, baby-killer.
@Psalm119v50 I know that abortion was legal then illegal before but that doesnt matter to me I live the present and from here on abortion will be legal until the end of my time and that is all that matters to me. LONG LIVE PRO-CHOICE. end of discussion losers.
You completely ignored the question. No surprise. You really do NOT want a discussion, because you have no argument or justification for the massacre of children in order to satisfy your perverse bloodlust. Again, Planned Parenthood was just struck a major blow, because people who think and behave like human beings understand what an evil organization it is. Abortion is in its twilight. This is the end of an era. Cry for me, baby-killer.
@Psalm119v50 You who claims to be so wise are so ignorant as to call a fetus a baby. Abortion is not the killing of a baby you idiot is the iterruption of a fetus' development. "Baby killer" your ass stupid, idiot.
The effort to say that fetuses are not human is just propaganda bullshit concocted by baby-killers like you in a pathetic effort to justify your bloodlust. You have shown through your love of abortion that you are evil. Not just your beliefs, but you, as an individual person, are evil. You're an infanticidal back-alley whore who gets off knowing that you're having a one-night stand with someone you won't remember and your baby is going to be slaughtered for your personal amusement.
Try answering a question. I'll even phrase it in your terms. WHAT IN THE CONSTITUTION GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO ABORT A FETUS? You "people" (and in your case I use the word VERY loosely) have NEVER cited any aspect of the Constitution which gives you an irrevocable right to abortion, and in fact Roe vs Wade is a decision in blatant violation of the 10th Amendment. Maybe you shouldn't spend so much time on your back, it seems to be cutting off the blood flow to your brain.
Not only is that a total lack of an argument, you also clearly don't understand how Roe V Wade is blatantly unconstitutional. Roe V Wade strips states of the authority to decide the legality of abortion, which is in their realm of authority, as the Constitution does not allocate that power specifically to the federal government. The 9th amendment does not give 5 liberals on the Supreme Court the power to nullify any law they deem inconvenient.
@Psalm119v50 No the 9th & 14th amendment strips states of that authority.\Roe V Wade merely recognized that fact.Just as the 14th amendment also strips the states from the power to prohibit homosexual marriage despite the fact that the supreme court has yet to recognize that fact.What's interesting is you ignore the rational of the decision, preferring to point out the effects of the decision & strawman. Sorry but in Liberal countries liberty & law reign supreme
Abortion is not liberty. It's infanticide. Under your "logic" (more like lack thereof) the states cannot pass laws of any kind. Explain to me the rationale of Roe V Wade. I'm dying to hear this. As abortion is not addressed anywhere in the US Constitution, by mandate of the 10th Ammendment, the State governments have authority to address it. Roe V Wade strips them of that power, giving authority to the federal government beyond Constitutional grounds. Defend your position. NOW.
@Psalm119v50 Prohibiting abortion violates substantive due process, as interpreted in Griswald V Connecticut. & Again The 14th & 9th Ammendment are what strip states of that power, Roe V Wade was a case in which that was recognized. What's funny is you are are not only ignoring the decision but you're also arguing against the wrong case.
Arguing that the right to use contraception equates to the right to have an abortion is like arguing that the right to bear arms equates to the right to go on a school shooting spree. By your standards, as long as I murder someone in a place of privacy, such as my own home, I'm well within my rights. I'm really not surprised you support judicial abuse of power, after all, the democratic process doesn't seem to work for your kind. You hate the right to vote when you don't win.
@Psalm119v50 I never gave you my standards, on anything & no one has ever argued that since contraception is legal abortion must also be legal. So those arguments would be straw men. I only hate the right to vote when it's given to jackasses whom believe that being totally ignorant of a subject makes them an expert.
What's wrong, can't defend your fallacious argument? Or do you really not know the details of the case you cited in an ill-conceived effort to find legal grounds for abortion? Your standards are clearly on display for the world to see, as you support infanticide and salivate at the abuse of judicial power in order to circumvent and undermine the democratic process. Your kind are the single greatest threat to liberty in modern society. I bet I know who you're voting for next year.
@Psalm119v50 I can't defend the straw man arguments you are arguing against. Which is why you argue against them because they can't be defended. Such tactics do not advance the discussion, & are only used by those whom know they are incapable of defeating their opponents actual position. Thus it is clear that there is no point in continue this debate as you have already conceded.
PS
& No I do not support infanticide, nor do I salivate at the abuse of judicial power, I merely care about reality.
Don't whine just because you have no argument. You first cited the 9th Amendment, which nowhere gives the right to abortion. You then cited a case regarding contraception as another legal justification, then instantly backtracked on it in your next comment. You clearly are in favor of judicial abuse of power, as you have expressed a desire to see the court mandate gay marriage on the country. And if you're seriously going to give support to abortion, then you support infanticide.
I've conceded nothing. It's hardly my problem if you're incapable of forming a lucid thought and defending it. Explain how I've slandered you. I say you support abortion (aka infanticide). You are standing in support of the idea of a right to abortion. I say you support judicial abuse of power to circumvent the democratic process. You've endorsed this practice on abortion and gay marriage. Try arguing instead of sputtering impotently and cursing in your own ineffectual frustration.
@Psalm119v50 You've conceded to everyone else when you decided to attack strawmen. Whether or not you'll concede to yourself is not my problem. I don't support abortion, & abortion isn't infanticide, as a fetus is not an infant. You can say what you want but you're lying. I only stated that the SCOTUS is required to interpret the law, & must include precedent in their decisions. The fact you believe this to be an abuse of power leaves me to wonder what you believe the function of the SCOTUS is.
Repeating "strawmen" in an effort to get out of making a case is beyond pathetic. One only needs to read your comments throughout this page to see that you call for the Supreme Court to legalize gay marriage, spitting in the face of the democratic process. I know full well the Supreme Court interprets the constitution, however there are at least 4 justices currently presiding who believe they have the authority to revise the constitution on a whim, (continued)
So you can either keep fighting strawmen , & lying to me about me. Or you can admit your real issue is that the law doesn't agree with you & your side lacks the numbers to amend the Constitution. The choice is yours but I'm not going to defend the strawmen you attack, & I'm not going to repeatedly correct every lie you tell. If you hate the law, you can try to change it but shouting about abuse of power without even knowing hoe power was used is pathetic.
Newsflash, we ARE trying to change the law. A major part of that is ensuring that justices like Sotomayor, Bryor, Ginsburg, and Kagan are not put on the Supreme Court, because they will continue to revise the Constitution on a whim. You think your side has the numbers to have abortion declared a constitutional right? And seriously, you say "strawmen" more than your idol says "hope" and "change." Might wanna think about broadening your vocabulary while you learn to make an argument.
@Psalm119v50 My idol is Thomas Paine dear, his mantra was reason, & morality. Again I'm not going to defend the arguments you attack because they are strawmen, if knowing your strategy offends you, I'm sorry but I'm not going to defend stupid arguments created just so you could defeat them & again I'm not going to deny the repeated false allegations. & No you're not tryin to change the law, you don't even know what the law is.
Wow. You're still screaming "strawmen" even after I explained a major part of how Roe V. Wade can and should be challenged. It's becoming clear that you are not only immature, whiny and immoral, you're also far too intellectual deficient to be part of this conversation. You don't even have the creativity to make your posts diverse in content. You are a complete waste of time, but don't expect me to stop responding. I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special.
@Psalm119v50 You never explained anything dear. You just gave counter arguments to arguments no uses & lied to me about what I have said. & I'm beginning to think you are a victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect. If you do feel like explaining what part of Roe V Wade you intend to challenge go ahead it would be much more productive than what you have been doing.
I very clearly explained that the best way to fight Roe V Wade is to elect leaders who won't put justices like Kagan or Bryor on the courts, because they will continue abusing their power to change American society on a whim. If you're not going to bother reading my comments before you respond, then this is a pointless discussion (also one sided, as you haven't actually said anything of substance for most of it). You can't call me a liar if you want more of these judges. Which is it?
@Psalm119v50 Again you can't just shout "abuse of power", & repeat 'judicial activism", when you wont even address the decision or the established precedent the decision was based on. What you really want is justices whom will ignore the established precedent & engage in judicial activism. It's funny because I'd call you a hypocrite but I don't think you're even elf aware at this point.
I addressed the decision. You're the one who keeps insisting that a case over the right to use contraception automatically means abortion must be legal. Arguing that the extension of privacy rights is that vast is beyond ludicrous. Also, I'll take an apology for your assertions that I'm a liar any time. You just revealed that you clearly support activist justices. So who's the liar now? Now watch as I miraculously predict the next uninspired comment..."blah blah strawmen blah blah."
@Psalm119v50 I never stated that because contraception i legal abortion should be legal, nor did I do any of the other things you have claimed. I'm sorry but I'm not going to apologize for calling you a liar, because A) I didn't & B) I would in no way be acting inappropriately if I did. & You already admitted you want judges to ignore legal precedent& thus be activist judges. So don't go projecting your desires on to me sir.
1- An activist judge is one who adds to or subtracts from the Constitution, not one who disagrees with the decisions of other judges.
2- *"You never explained anything dear. You just gave counter arguments to arguments no uses & lied to me about what I have said."* You're either not reading your own comments or more likely, you're lying again. Either way, you're in the wrong.
3- I warned you, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special. Keep sputtering for me.
1. Ignoring legal precedent solely so you can legislate from the bench is is exactly what n activist judge does. Complaining about activist judges whom are not activist judges but merely men who are bound by precedent, while openly stating you want activist judges is retarded.
2. I Have yet to lie dear.
3. I told you go fuck yourself
PS
What part of go fuck yourself did you not understand you O2 thief?
And there we have it. You are officially and completely dissociated from reality. Were you born a pathological liar, or did you become one after swallowing Bill Clinton's semen?
The elimination of rulings that are judicial activism is NOT judicial activism. It's called "the job of the Supreme Court." Since you're an incoherent pathological liar, it's a bit pointless to continue this. But as I said, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special. Especially liars.
Ignoring precedent so you can legislate from the bench is judicial activism. You admitted that you want SCOTUS justices to ignore established precedent solely for the purpose of legislating from the bench. So that is judicial activism. It is still judicial activism when it overturns a decision you disagree with, even if you call that decision "judicial activism" while being totally unfamiliar with the actual decision & precedent.
Newsflash, precedent is binding only for a court that is lower than the one that set the precedent. The Supreme Court has overturned numerous precedents throughout history. The Supreme Court is bound by the Constitution, not by judicial activist "precedents" like Roe V Wade or the Dred Scott case. And yes, those are very comparable. They both abused judicial power to push the agenda of the Democrat Party. Again, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special.
@Psalm119v50 Reality check, precedent must be followed by all courts equal or lower, & even precedent set by lower courts must be taken into consideration unless said precedent is questioned.I can't believe you actually stated that Roe V Wade was based on Roe V Wade. I mean it was bad enough when you claimed it was based on the fact contraception was legal but this, are you trollin or just utterly deficient.
Wow, you really are either incredibly stupid or a liar. Wait, you support abortion. It's both. If you take from my comments that I claimed Roe V Wade was based on Roe V Wade, then your "intellect" (HA!) is worthy of less respect than I thought. Spend your time learning to read better instead of killing babies.
Ooo, calling me deficient, wonder where you heard that one? You truly have no creative thought in your head, though I must say I'm flattered that you're trying to use my words.
By the way, do you bother listening to yourself when you speak and write, or do you just spout off at random? I'm cracking up at how you wrote *"I'm sorry but I'm not going to apologize."* I'm really questioning whether you're aware of the things you write, or if you're just completely incoherent.
(continued) which is why 4 justices decided to declare that there is no constitutional right to bear arms. People like yourself endorse this practice of judicial revision, as opposed to interpretation, because your agendas lose at the ballot box more often than not. You also have some nerve, making statements in favor of abortion while simultaneously trying to say you don't support it. Call me a liar all you want, you're the one who makes shameful claims you can't defend.
@Psalm119v50 That's right repeating strawmen arguments is a pathetic way to avoid making an argument against anyone's actual positions. But you keep making them. Never said I wanted the SCOTUS to abuse power to make gay marriage legal, I stated it was already constitutionally protected, nor did I ever state that because contraception is legal abortion should be legal, i merely pointed out that Roe v Wade was based on substantive due process as interpreted in Griswold v CT. Cont.
I think I agree with you, but you are a fucking ass. Learn to debate and not be such a douche. Which was a form of birth control back in the day so I think I tied that up nicely.
Well there is debating, acting like an ass, or moving on to some other area where you might be more affective. (Yes I know I used an "A"). The problem is some people have different definition on life.
mjt19741 I am pro-life and i have been to the pro-life page that clcking on your name takes me to but .... the ultimate destination of Margaret Sanger's soul is up to god alone, and i am sure he sees more to her than her feminist politics. How can u call yourself pro-life when u want someone to burn forever? Do all racists burn in hell? what about all murderers, all blasphemers, all liars? Who does Jesus spend his Mwercy on according to you
@rhibac You can't say that no one is forcing women to have abortions today. At the abortion clinics, the counselors will brainwash them into thinking its ok. They will always make it sound perfect. They will always make it sound safe. Scientific facts have proven that it is much safer to have a natural birth. Alot of women that have abortions will hide that regret, some have hidden that regret as long as 50 years or longer. The power behind abortion is the money involved in it.
llike i say to others BS you try to make this a race issue, the people who seek abortions do this to themselves not no stinking brainwashing doctors with out people seeking abortions they would not operate period they have no magic spells over people
adults make there own decisions i knew a woman who made her daughter get an abortion cause she was pregnant at 16.
of course they are gonna regret somewhere down the line when they cant have children anymore
counselors at doctors offices or shall i say doctors influence you to take prescriptions that can very well kill you s by your logic.donor agencies counselors coach you or influence you to make a decision on being a donor/sponsor
thats what counselors are there for, if the counselors told these women there are risk etc it would not change a damn thing.
i also knew a woman who aborted her child cause the father was not going to be around making this decision on her own from jump
@rhibac If you are so sure that you are right, then do 2 things. First go to an abortion clinic and ask the doctor/counselor about abortion. Second ask a pediatrition or an OBGYN that same question. Trust me, you will find a different answer.
Then afterward you can expect a raise in the birthrate, and feminine health problems in this country exponentially because none of us low income family women can afford to go to a normal OBGYN clinic to get checked for those problems, or to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
@Onitsu Generally, the way you prevent unwanted pregnancies is to keep your legs closed, problem solved. Maybe you should ask why PP targets low income minorities... perhaps the Democrats are trying to solve the country's exploding Welfare and Medicaid problem. Somehow there are more minority individuals and families on gov't handouts than European Americans ("white folk") even though they outnumber minorities 5 to 1 in America. Welfare pays mothers more money per child they pop out?!
hmm.... i'm disinclined to believe that there's any validity to claims made by fox news. especially claims being supported by video clips. they kinda have a history of running with bogus stuff. like saying a guy trying to get info about a human trafficking plot so he can report it is portrayed as engaging in said plot of fox news.... or the lady talking about how she overcame her own prejudice is portrayed as a racist on fox.
imagine how topsy turvy the world would be if tumors and fetuses had more rights than sentient beings. wow! we may as well give rights to BEANS and ROSEBUSHES. fucking lunatics. rofl. "pro-lifers" (aka "pro-yakity-yak") are so fucking mental in the head, it's funny.
gee... how do we escape our own meaningless, out-of-control lives while controlling others at the same time in a thin veil of christianity? i know! let's force laws on people's own bodies instead of curing aids, improving the environment, fighting political corruption, etc. rather than improve the world, the christian thing to do is to control people and treat everyone around them like 3 year olds. good plan, nutjobs. ROFL.
No, he's a supporter of Planned parenthood and abortion, a supporter of genocide of innocent babies that don't get a choice on weather they're murdered or not.
Name calling now? Utterly pathetic. On abortion, some people say well if you get it at a certain stage it's okay, according to the law of biogenisis, all life comes from pre existing life, and each species reproduces after its own kind, human beings can only reproduce other human beings, so it doesn't start out as a different species and turn into a different species along the way.
Well some people say well it's a a woman's body, it should be her choice; there's a 50% chance that her baby will be a male child, and he would have a penis, women don't have penises, so it's residing in her body, it's not part of her body. And the bottom line is I really believe if the unborn is not a human being have as many abortions as you want, no justification is necessary
@xtrashed "there's a 50% chance that her baby will be a male child, and he would have a penis, women don't have penises, so it's residing in her body, it's not part of her body."
Lets see you define life, you godless pro-abortion baby-killer. I'm dying to hear this, since its "above Obama's paygrade." When do we get human rights? If it is at birth, then how is a child born 8 months after conception more human than a child in the womb at 9 months after conception? There is no standard or basis for your beliefs that unborn children can be murdered, you "people" simply love getting your rocks off by bashing children's skulls in.
If on the other hand the unborn is a human being no justification would be adequate, unless another human life is at risk, that being the mother's, but you wouldn't be acting to kill, you would be acting to save a life. Even if you don't share our faith, it's wrong to take a human life. The science on abortion is clear. There are two victims in abortion, the women do not need to be condemned, it's an issue that needs to be handled with love. Women are not given all the facts.
@xtrashed prove that cancer cells aren't sentient then, wacko. if you can't, we should let people die of cancer too in your imaginary alien universe. rofl. you're so retarded it's funny!
scared of the reality, i see. you're a hypocrite. you think cancer cells are NOT living things but fetuses are. why? and you base your whole argument on separating a tumor from a fetus. cuz you're a confused nutcase, that's why. there is no difference. what allows a woman to have an abortion is the same reason why we're allowed to extract tumors. cuz we have a right to our own bodies, dumb backward hick.
@xtrashed I meant how is it that Obama is a supporter of the Eugenics movement. I mean, plenty of people are (sadly) in favor of letting abortion be pretty freely available, but I doubt that many of them embrace eugenics.
Obama is a president.;must treat every one equal. and what he said is people have to make their own choice. God also gave us a choice.
support him and tell people to be careful not to abort; do you think he will get the vote to be a president if he only has to do what we want him to do?please think.
I don't follow presidents or politicians, I follow God. Have you read the commandments; Thou Shall not kill. Babies are being killed in the womb, and women are not given all the facts on abortion either. And organizations like Planned Parenthood are protecting sex abuse from reported, look at channel: liveactionfilms
I do not stand in support of the culture of death, but the culture of life!
i agree with you, that is not the point. they are misleading you so that you hate Obama, he said, if a woman is big enough to be pregnant, they make their decisions, he didn't say abort.
Obama is a president and he is trying to put the wrong write.and the conservatives are acting like us to destroy him, by accusing him saying he support abortion. u might be one of them who act like systematizing about PP to be against Obama.
Look at the video on the sidebar, Obama addressing Planned Parenthood and even laughing. Look at the video at the top: Barack Obama and the Negro Project. He and his administration help to sponsor them, helping to continue the genocide of Black babies.
@xtrashed If people believed that then I guess they'll believe anything. A person who was persecuted while growing up simply because he was black would want to end the black race? A person who doesn't care that he lets the whole world know he loves Basketball (Very popular sport in the Black community) instead of golf. Sound argument there buddy.
If the unborn baby is part of the body of the mother, I can't understand why the doctor has to count all of the little broken off arms and legs of the baby that are sucked out of the mother to make sure none are left inside. In fact if they leave any part of the dead baby inside the mother, she could die. Half of women carrying babies have a little boy inside them with a penis. Is that penis a part of her body? That would be a first.
I believe that as Christians we are obligated to step in. The Bible makes it clear that it is wrong to stand by as innocent blood is shed. (Deut 21:5, 7-9; Ezk 22:3-4, Is 1:15-16, Lev 18:21. ) Ruben rescued Joseph (Gn 37:21-22), Hebrew midwives rescued baby boys from the infanticide of Pharaoh (Ex 1:17) The solders of Saul rescued Jonathan from murder (1 Sam 14:45), Obadiah rescued 100 prophets from Jezebel. Esther risked her life to save her people from genocide.
@xtrashed nigger what? get the fuck outta here, cotton pixie. we don't need more children in the world, asshole. 6 billion is enough for fuck's sakes. instead of pretending to give a fuck about the world, try saving the children already BORN, like the ones dying of aids in africa? oh yeah, i forgot, you don't really give a fuck. you're just some mouthy broad with a fascist tendency telling people what to do instead of manning up and doing your own damn shit. you have no face, cunt. fuck u. LOL.
i cant believe that planned parenthood is forcing black women to have their children to be aborted which makes way more sense than a proportionately higher amount of black women deciding to get abortions.
DaKewlJamal 2 months ago
eugenics
truth2350 3 months ago
this is true . planned parenthood is genocide toward Black people . I have a dvd call Maafa 21 the government are behind this
blessmimi 3 months ago
For all the dumb Black people out there considering voting for Obama a second time,you should know that he supports PP whole heartedly. While you are busy loving him...he does not seem to feel the same about you. I warned Blacks the first time and i will again....stop looking at his skin color and you will see the man has very low morals and/or values. Obama is working for demons behind the scenes who wants to kill off the Black pop and Obama is helping them achieve this goal. Wake up Black ppl.
DaOrigTruthSeeker 4 months ago
@DaOrigTruthSeeker I dont look at Obama's race, I look at his IQ and compare that to the Republicans running for president. And I realize Obama is more centered.
ras144 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Defund Planned Parenthood.
whitesox2005ify 6 months ago
One of te rare moments Fox News gets something right. Fuck Planned Parenthood!
ThePlatinumDog 6 months ago
MARGARET SANGER TARGETS BLACK BABIES BECAUSE SHE FELT THAT THEY ARE GENETICALLY INFERIOR.....COMPLETE BULLSHIT
MrGIMMEMOOR 7 months ago
It's not just BLACK CHILDREN. It's Abortion is TRAGIC for ALL RACES!!!!
MarkCox73 8 months ago
@MarkCox73 You're absolutely right. The percentage of abortions of black children, however, is disproportionate to the percentage of black people nationwide. The video is simply pointing out that blacks are targeted more than other races. But I completely agree that all children must be spared from abortion regardless of skin color, as all of them are precious!
impasse0124 7 months ago
@impasse0124 Targeted? How does one target for abortion?
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics tend to be built in areas populated by minorities and underpriveleged areas because the idea is that these women are more likely to find themselves in crisis pregnancy situations. Thus, when faced with an unplanned pregnancy, the solution is right around the corner. Obviously there are Planned Parenthoods in middle class areas as well, but they tend to be more dominant in low-income neighborhoods.
impasse0124 5 months ago
@impasse0124 SO targeted means dispersed in a manner consistent with need?
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux Well since you phrased it that way, abortion is an elective procedure. It is never "needed".
impasse0124 5 months ago
@impasse0124 Nothings ever needed, even if the procedure is necessary to save someones life it is not needed unless you desire a certain outcome. So you're sticking with the targeted by placing them where they are most likely to be used?
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux Let me put it this way: Planned Parenthood has repeatedly made the claim that they want to reduce abortions in this country, yet it is a well-known fact that the majority of their income from services they provide can be narrowed down to abortions. They see these low-income neighborhoods and know that they've hit the jackpot. They don't care about reducing abortions; they simply want to make money. They've taken donations from those who specifically want black abortions.
impasse0124 5 months ago
@impasse0124 Okay, well see here's the problem, you're stupid. If they subsidized abortions or provided them at cost you retards would be saying the same damned thing (only you'd be right), so they charge for abortions (they usually refer people to other providers for abortions but whatever), & the fact that they subsidize contraception which has been shown to reduce the abortion rate gets ignored. Not to mention it's a NPO. & Money from racists spends no different. So yeah you're full of it.
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux Well I'm not going to have a discussion with someone who sums it up by saying "You're stupid". I didn't treat you with that contempt and if that's the way you feel, nothing I say will even be given fair consideration by you. Have a nice day.
impasse0124 5 months ago
@impasse0124 Yes, you treated me with contempt when you decided to insult my intellect. You literally argued that since PP engages in steps to reduce abortions, that means they want to increase abortions & that it's a bad origination because it took money from someone who is a racist. If you actually expected any thinking person to not think you are stupid after that, you're also arrogant. Oh & you're also a cry baby.
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@IHavAUTubeSadly Tax dollars do not fund abortions, they do fund welfare and if PP is defunded leaving many poor women, minority women, unable to afford to pay for reproductive health services, welfare costs will increase.
07Haley31 9 months ago
@07Haley31 Why is is to you about money? PP is about money and death. And lowering the birthrate. Among all people.
frank2033 9 months ago
@07Haley31 Murder is murder,,,if you don't abort, a baby is born...!! so its still KILLING another human soul!! there are many childless couples who would love to adopt these babies
peacechild61 6 months ago
@peacechild61 No there are not plenty of people who are willing to adopt minority children. There are folks standing in line to adopt healthy, white infants but not minority children. And adopting out a child is not part of the culture of African-American's -- they'll keep the child or give it to a relative to raise. And yes it's about money, the money it takes to raise a child, the money for housing, food, clothes, medical care. That is always a part of the decision.
mdcemmy 6 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
"We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population" Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, inspiration for Hitler's German Sterilization law as Nazi Doctor's were inspired by articles in the journal "Birth Control Review" which Sanger started. Planned Parenthood killed 330,000 babies last year with my taxpayer money. If family planning & birth control are private issues pay for it yourselves!
BlackRepublican2010 9 months ago
Oh my God--Planned Parenthood--Shame on you!
bluepuppyboy 9 months ago
uncle toms
216CERTIFIED 9 months ago
@216CERTIFIED Uncle Toms? Uncle Tom had enough sense NOT to suck up to the KKK in happy face aka PP. The only sellouts are the NAACP,etc that supports the KKK without the bed sheets ( PP), Why are hollywood celebrities that whine "Racism is evil" so quick to defend PP- founded by KKK woman, Maraget Sanger.
kevyster 9 months ago
Us democrats... Founders of the KKK support planned parenthood
Way too many blacks mexican and puerto ricans ABORT THEM ALL!!!!!
PezCandyDispensers 10 months ago
Either you can let the woman or girl have the abortion or you can not and the child ends up abused and put in an even worse situation. Even financially stable married woman don't take care of their kids that's when they mysteriously disappear and then you find out the mother did it. I've learned not to judge and to promote birth control to all woman and not the bullshit pill the implanon
09rfields 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'It's Not Planned Parenthood -- No, It's Planned Genocide'
koledy123 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'It's Not Planned Parenthood -- No, It's Planned Genocide'
koledy123 10 months ago
yeah yeah...all Im gonna say is that I would rather see african babies being brought up by africans capable of raising children right than by those incapable of raising a child. Same goes for whites, hispanics and everyone else. We don't need more failures. let people do what they want...if they are going to burn for it, its their ass not yours
dabillz41 10 months ago
sorry, just because the receptionist agreed to "make a note" of the mans request to donate towards only black abortion, that does not mean that is how planned parenthood actually treats their abortions! they are not out to target any race! they are helping women who CHOOSE to have an abortion.
obviously the receptionist was sarcastic. A donation is a donation, and the man on the phone is only trying to entrap her to fuel the fire against abortion using racism.
THIS IS RIDICULOUS!
looorrii 11 months ago
@looorrii What's ridiculous is the people that continue to make excuses for murderers and racists. That's really pathetic. Keep on making excuses.
Standonarock 9 months ago
Pro-choice is the way to go. I love abortion!
Hugs,
Satan
cornfednebraskaneer 11 months ago
funny bc pp's founder was racist against blacks. they dont just kill black babies... they abort babies of all races!
elviscrzychic 11 months ago
This is dumb. Times have changed; some people still need to move on. I'm sure Planned Parenthood has gone passed the "blatant racism" it used to discreetly perceive. I'm black, and honestly, I'm all for Planned Parenthood. It's called that for a reason.
MidorixAsuka 11 months ago 2
Every single person in this video who is against planned parenthood is the first person to be in favor of help for that child such as food stamps.
TheCaliCapitalist 11 months ago
That Ohio phone call didn't prove crap. She was like "OK Whatever..." Then she could of hung up the phone or just not respond.
RumbleHD 11 months ago
Yeah, they're really "forcing" people to get abortions. Fucking hell, ridiculous. Can't people be responsible for their own choices for once?
PleasantProductions 11 months ago
Comment removed
budsmoon 11 months ago
It is only a race issue if being stupid enough to get knocked up is limited to that race! It makes more sense for the clinics to be in those minority neighborhoods if that is where so much of the stupidity is occurring. With the exception of a few times when birth control failed, or in case of rape (which preg could be prevented there also) then there is no excuse for unwanted pregnancy. Either close your legs or get on proper birth control!
budsmoon 11 months ago
I hate it when people exploit race for political gain...
GGLebo23 1 year ago
The White lady on the phone that was like, "Okay... whatever." Obviously sounded annoyed by that guys pretend racism. You can tell by her tone that she was either disgusted or thought it was a dumb joke.
These ppl are dumb btw. People CHOOSE to have abortions. Learn what the word genocide means b4 you go flinging it around. This is a Black man saying this
GGLebo23 1 year ago
@GGLebo23 How about this phonecall?: youtube.com/watch?v=apLjGQnTVg8
i am for legalised abortions but you cannot ignore strikingly and openly nazi views (see her quotations) of planned parenthood founder Margaret S
hallobaaaby 11 months ago
@hallobaaaby I already saw that on another video. They edited out some parts on that one to make the White lady sound bad. I'll look for the link lady, but the White woman on the phone sounded clearly annoyed. She just wanted to get of the phone with the dude as fast as she could. You could tell from her voice. However, the link you just sent edited that part out. Didn't you wonder why they didn't play it all the way thru. I'll look for the original vid and give it to you.
GGLebo23 11 months ago
@GGLebo23 Yeah, there's clearly ideological manipulation going on from both sides. The main thing to me is that MAnger was a exuberant eugenicist and feverish racist. I was surprised to find that Bill Gates' father was director of the organisation too, and even more surprised to find Gates stating with blunt clarity that he likes the idea of reducing earth's population through...vaccines(i watched it many times in case i misunderstood).Then the 'georgia guidestones'.These r just sick fucks!tcare
hallobaaaby 11 months ago
"Okay, whatever" is not acceptance. These phone calls are setups.
InfiniteTurtles 1 year ago
Margaret Sanger was right
Wtfgames 1 year ago
@DonnyDeutschisBigBro Well black people are still here. If its too much for you to handle kill yourself :)
ColdHeartedHonesty 1 year ago
Prove to me that planned parenthood deliberately kills fetus on every person, every black person that turns up pregnant i wonder why PP never sought to abort some of my cousins kids
oh yeah i have a sister on my fathers side who was barely raised by her own mother and lived with her she became pregnant at 15 and the other 14 PP did not show up at the hospital saying you should abort your child you freaks GTFOH with that
rhibac 1 year ago
Planned Parenthood is evil!
fintyrock 1 year ago
Why do we give our tax dollars to planned parenthood? They are still eugenic to this very day!!!!! They are located mainly in minority areas. And their whole agenda is to kill minorities.
These people are simply evil.
randomscience1 1 year ago
Margret Sanger was a beast. She will surely rott in hell, for the murder of innocent black babies. It is written that whosever would harm a child, it
will be better for them if they had never been born. She was Satans
deciple, and she was to blacks what Hitler was to the Jews. A monster.
A White Racist Devil Beast, along with her counterparts who helped her.
tonyuptown69 1 year ago
Anti-choicer think we are so dumb as to believe this lie. They are just trying to recruit people and they are using all kinds of tricks. Race discrimination is one of this tricks.
NO ANTI-CHOICERS WE DONT BELIEVE YOUR LIES, PRO-CHOICERS FIGHT TO KEEP OUR WOMENS RIGHTS.
PALOMITA694 1 year ago
@PALOMITA694
Just another Pro-Abortion blood-freak who gets off sexually by bashing children's skulls in. Your filthy beliefs are coming to an end. We will rip abortion out of our culture no matter how hard you kick and scream.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 WHATEVER! Some idiots thought that the world was coming to an end in the year 2000, too.
PALOMITA694 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
What the hell does the Y2K theory have to do with abortion? Its no wonder you support abortion, your "logic" shows that you were probably dropped on your head repeatedly as a child. Roe V Wade is a decision in blatant defiance of the Constitution, and it will not stand. Now shut up and go back to masturbating to pictures of murdered children, you godless pro-abortion baby-killer.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Go and masturbate while reading your psalms 19v50 through the hell and the devil dwelling inside your fucking cunt or dick! and if you believe that abortion will be illegal in this country again you are as stupid and the people who believe that the end of the world was in the Y2K. Do you get it now IDIOT?
PALOMITA694 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
You know less about Scripture than you do about history. Abortion was legal in the US long before Roe V Wade, depending on the state. Roe defied the 10th amendment by stripping power from the states and giving it to the federal government. Let's see your baby-killer brain answer this: what in the Constitution gives you the right to kill an unborn baby? By the way, the House just voted to defund Planned Parenthood. Get your facts straight before you open your mouth, baby-killer.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 I know that abortion was legal then illegal before but that doesnt matter to me I live the present and from here on abortion will be legal until the end of my time and that is all that matters to me. LONG LIVE PRO-CHOICE. end of discussion losers.
PALOMITA694 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
You completely ignored the question. No surprise. You really do NOT want a discussion, because you have no argument or justification for the massacre of children in order to satisfy your perverse bloodlust. Again, Planned Parenthood was just struck a major blow, because people who think and behave like human beings understand what an evil organization it is. Abortion is in its twilight. This is the end of an era. Cry for me, baby-killer.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 You who claims to be so wise are so ignorant as to call a fetus a baby. Abortion is not the killing of a baby you idiot is the iterruption of a fetus' development. "Baby killer" your ass stupid, idiot.
PALOMITA694 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
The effort to say that fetuses are not human is just propaganda bullshit concocted by baby-killers like you in a pathetic effort to justify your bloodlust. You have shown through your love of abortion that you are evil. Not just your beliefs, but you, as an individual person, are evil. You're an infanticidal back-alley whore who gets off knowing that you're having a one-night stand with someone you won't remember and your baby is going to be slaughtered for your personal amusement.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Well now you done it!
You not only kicked @PALOMITA694 ass and have shown her for the evil fool she is.
But you have also got her running away yelping like a whipped dog!
Good job!
ekajeht 11 months ago
Comment removed
PALOMITA694 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
Try answering a question. I'll even phrase it in your terms. WHAT IN THE CONSTITUTION GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO ABORT A FETUS? You "people" (and in your case I use the word VERY loosely) have NEVER cited any aspect of the Constitution which gives you an irrevocable right to abortion, and in fact Roe vs Wade is a decision in blatant violation of the 10th Amendment. Maybe you shouldn't spend so much time on your back, it seems to be cutting off the blood flow to your brain.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@Psalm119v50 9th Amendment.
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux
Not only is that a total lack of an argument, you also clearly don't understand how Roe V Wade is blatantly unconstitutional. Roe V Wade strips states of the authority to decide the legality of abortion, which is in their realm of authority, as the Constitution does not allocate that power specifically to the federal government. The 9th amendment does not give 5 liberals on the Supreme Court the power to nullify any law they deem inconvenient.
Psalm119v50 5 months ago
@Psalm119v50 No the 9th & 14th amendment strips states of that authority.\Roe V Wade merely recognized that fact.Just as the 14th amendment also strips the states from the power to prohibit homosexual marriage despite the fact that the supreme court has yet to recognize that fact.What's interesting is you ignore the rational of the decision, preferring to point out the effects of the decision & strawman. Sorry but in Liberal countries liberty & law reign supreme
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux
Abortion is not liberty. It's infanticide. Under your "logic" (more like lack thereof) the states cannot pass laws of any kind. Explain to me the rationale of Roe V Wade. I'm dying to hear this. As abortion is not addressed anywhere in the US Constitution, by mandate of the 10th Ammendment, the State governments have authority to address it. Roe V Wade strips them of that power, giving authority to the federal government beyond Constitutional grounds. Defend your position. NOW.
Psalm119v50 5 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Prohibiting abortion violates substantive due process, as interpreted in Griswald V Connecticut. & Again The 14th & 9th Ammendment are what strip states of that power, Roe V Wade was a case in which that was recognized. What's funny is you are are not only ignoring the decision but you're also arguing against the wrong case.
yellowkrux 5 months ago
@yellowkrux
Arguing that the right to use contraception equates to the right to have an abortion is like arguing that the right to bear arms equates to the right to go on a school shooting spree. By your standards, as long as I murder someone in a place of privacy, such as my own home, I'm well within my rights. I'm really not surprised you support judicial abuse of power, after all, the democratic process doesn't seem to work for your kind. You hate the right to vote when you don't win.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 I never gave you my standards, on anything & no one has ever argued that since contraception is legal abortion must also be legal. So those arguments would be straw men. I only hate the right to vote when it's given to jackasses whom believe that being totally ignorant of a subject makes them an expert.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
What's wrong, can't defend your fallacious argument? Or do you really not know the details of the case you cited in an ill-conceived effort to find legal grounds for abortion? Your standards are clearly on display for the world to see, as you support infanticide and salivate at the abuse of judicial power in order to circumvent and undermine the democratic process. Your kind are the single greatest threat to liberty in modern society. I bet I know who you're voting for next year.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 I can't defend the straw man arguments you are arguing against. Which is why you argue against them because they can't be defended. Such tactics do not advance the discussion, & are only used by those whom know they are incapable of defeating their opponents actual position. Thus it is clear that there is no point in continue this debate as you have already conceded.
PS
& No I do not support infanticide, nor do I salivate at the abuse of judicial power, I merely care about reality.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Don't whine just because you have no argument. You first cited the 9th Amendment, which nowhere gives the right to abortion. You then cited a case regarding contraception as another legal justification, then instantly backtracked on it in your next comment. You clearly are in favor of judicial abuse of power, as you have expressed a desire to see the court mandate gay marriage on the country. And if you're seriously going to give support to abortion, then you support infanticide.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Don't whine that you've already conceded. & Don't claim that I'm in favor of something I'm against.
PS
Seriously, remember no one gives a fuck if you can defeat your own arguments, nor is a fuck given that you can slander others.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
I've conceded nothing. It's hardly my problem if you're incapable of forming a lucid thought and defending it. Explain how I've slandered you. I say you support abortion (aka infanticide). You are standing in support of the idea of a right to abortion. I say you support judicial abuse of power to circumvent the democratic process. You've endorsed this practice on abortion and gay marriage. Try arguing instead of sputtering impotently and cursing in your own ineffectual frustration.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 You've conceded to everyone else when you decided to attack strawmen. Whether or not you'll concede to yourself is not my problem. I don't support abortion, & abortion isn't infanticide, as a fetus is not an infant. You can say what you want but you're lying. I only stated that the SCOTUS is required to interpret the law, & must include precedent in their decisions. The fact you believe this to be an abuse of power leaves me to wonder what you believe the function of the SCOTUS is.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Repeating "strawmen" in an effort to get out of making a case is beyond pathetic. One only needs to read your comments throughout this page to see that you call for the Supreme Court to legalize gay marriage, spitting in the face of the democratic process. I know full well the Supreme Court interprets the constitution, however there are at least 4 justices currently presiding who believe they have the authority to revise the constitution on a whim, (continued)
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Cont.
So you can either keep fighting strawmen , & lying to me about me. Or you can admit your real issue is that the law doesn't agree with you & your side lacks the numbers to amend the Constitution. The choice is yours but I'm not going to defend the strawmen you attack, & I'm not going to repeatedly correct every lie you tell. If you hate the law, you can try to change it but shouting about abuse of power without even knowing hoe power was used is pathetic.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Newsflash, we ARE trying to change the law. A major part of that is ensuring that justices like Sotomayor, Bryor, Ginsburg, and Kagan are not put on the Supreme Court, because they will continue to revise the Constitution on a whim. You think your side has the numbers to have abortion declared a constitutional right? And seriously, you say "strawmen" more than your idol says "hope" and "change." Might wanna think about broadening your vocabulary while you learn to make an argument.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 My idol is Thomas Paine dear, his mantra was reason, & morality. Again I'm not going to defend the arguments you attack because they are strawmen, if knowing your strategy offends you, I'm sorry but I'm not going to defend stupid arguments created just so you could defeat them & again I'm not going to deny the repeated false allegations. & No you're not tryin to change the law, you don't even know what the law is.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Wow. You're still screaming "strawmen" even after I explained a major part of how Roe V. Wade can and should be challenged. It's becoming clear that you are not only immature, whiny and immoral, you're also far too intellectual deficient to be part of this conversation. You don't even have the creativity to make your posts diverse in content. You are a complete waste of time, but don't expect me to stop responding. I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 You never explained anything dear. You just gave counter arguments to arguments no uses & lied to me about what I have said. & I'm beginning to think you are a victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect. If you do feel like explaining what part of Roe V Wade you intend to challenge go ahead it would be much more productive than what you have been doing.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
I very clearly explained that the best way to fight Roe V Wade is to elect leaders who won't put justices like Kagan or Bryor on the courts, because they will continue abusing their power to change American society on a whim. If you're not going to bother reading my comments before you respond, then this is a pointless discussion (also one sided, as you haven't actually said anything of substance for most of it). You can't call me a liar if you want more of these judges. Which is it?
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Again you can't just shout "abuse of power", & repeat 'judicial activism", when you wont even address the decision or the established precedent the decision was based on. What you really want is justices whom will ignore the established precedent & engage in judicial activism. It's funny because I'd call you a hypocrite but I don't think you're even elf aware at this point.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
I addressed the decision. You're the one who keeps insisting that a case over the right to use contraception automatically means abortion must be legal. Arguing that the extension of privacy rights is that vast is beyond ludicrous. Also, I'll take an apology for your assertions that I'm a liar any time. You just revealed that you clearly support activist justices. So who's the liar now? Now watch as I miraculously predict the next uninspired comment..."blah blah strawmen blah blah."
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 I never stated that because contraception i legal abortion should be legal, nor did I do any of the other things you have claimed. I'm sorry but I'm not going to apologize for calling you a liar, because A) I didn't & B) I would in no way be acting inappropriately if I did. & You already admitted you want judges to ignore legal precedent& thus be activist judges. So don't go projecting your desires on to me sir.
PS
Go fuck yourself.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
1- An activist judge is one who adds to or subtracts from the Constitution, not one who disagrees with the decisions of other judges.
2- *"You never explained anything dear. You just gave counter arguments to arguments no uses & lied to me about what I have said."* You're either not reading your own comments or more likely, you're lying again. Either way, you're in the wrong.
3- I warned you, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special. Keep sputtering for me.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50
1. Ignoring legal precedent solely so you can legislate from the bench is is exactly what n activist judge does. Complaining about activist judges whom are not activist judges but merely men who are bound by precedent, while openly stating you want activist judges is retarded.
2. I Have yet to lie dear.
3. I told you go fuck yourself
PS
What part of go fuck yourself did you not understand you O2 thief?
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
And there we have it. You are officially and completely dissociated from reality. Were you born a pathological liar, or did you become one after swallowing Bill Clinton's semen?
The elimination of rulings that are judicial activism is NOT judicial activism. It's called "the job of the Supreme Court." Since you're an incoherent pathological liar, it's a bit pointless to continue this. But as I said, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special. Especially liars.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50
Are you also incapable of reading?
Ignoring precedent so you can legislate from the bench is judicial activism. You admitted that you want SCOTUS justices to ignore established precedent solely for the purpose of legislating from the bench. So that is judicial activism. It is still judicial activism when it overturns a decision you disagree with, even if you call that decision "judicial activism" while being totally unfamiliar with the actual decision & precedent.
PS
GFY already.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Newsflash, precedent is binding only for a court that is lower than the one that set the precedent. The Supreme Court has overturned numerous precedents throughout history. The Supreme Court is bound by the Constitution, not by judicial activist "precedents" like Roe V Wade or the Dred Scott case. And yes, those are very comparable. They both abused judicial power to push the agenda of the Democrat Party. Again, I don't back down to childish simpletons who think they're special.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Reality check, precedent must be followed by all courts equal or lower, & even precedent set by lower courts must be taken into consideration unless said precedent is questioned.I can't believe you actually stated that Roe V Wade was based on Roe V Wade. I mean it was bad enough when you claimed it was based on the fact contraception was legal but this, are you trollin or just utterly deficient.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
Wow, you really are either incredibly stupid or a liar. Wait, you support abortion. It's both. If you take from my comments that I claimed Roe V Wade was based on Roe V Wade, then your "intellect" (HA!) is worthy of less respect than I thought. Spend your time learning to read better instead of killing babies.
Ooo, calling me deficient, wonder where you heard that one? You truly have no creative thought in your head, though I must say I'm flattered that you're trying to use my words.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 Yep trollin'.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
I would make a Charlie Sheen reference, but it would be totally unfair since, astoundingly enough, he's far more coherent than you.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
By the way, do you bother listening to yourself when you speak and write, or do you just spout off at random? I'm cracking up at how you wrote *"I'm sorry but I'm not going to apologize."* I'm really questioning whether you're aware of the things you write, or if you're just completely incoherent.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@yellowkrux
(continued) which is why 4 justices decided to declare that there is no constitutional right to bear arms. People like yourself endorse this practice of judicial revision, as opposed to interpretation, because your agendas lose at the ballot box more often than not. You also have some nerve, making statements in favor of abortion while simultaneously trying to say you don't support it. Call me a liar all you want, you're the one who makes shameful claims you can't defend.
Psalm119v50 4 months ago
@Psalm119v50 That's right repeating strawmen arguments is a pathetic way to avoid making an argument against anyone's actual positions. But you keep making them. Never said I wanted the SCOTUS to abuse power to make gay marriage legal, I stated it was already constitutionally protected, nor did I ever state that because contraception is legal abortion should be legal, i merely pointed out that Roe v Wade was based on substantive due process as interpreted in Griswold v CT. Cont.
yellowkrux 4 months ago
@PALOMITA694 says=" abortion will stay legal..."
---------
Ohio has a bill up right now that will out law abortions as soon as a heart beat is detected 3 weeks!
It doesn't totally outlaw abortions .....yet!
Wait till we get control of the senate and the oval office and see how things workout .
ekajeht 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694 says="you really need to...."
-----
LOL
After reading your last few replies it seems as if you have reverted back to your insane rants with idiotic ramblings and disgusting insults!
THANKS!
It makes my day when I -KNOW - that you have lost it and are in a stuper slobbering all over yourself !
BTW- Please don't let these posts that show you as a complete fool stop you from posting more of your idiot rants.
Because we love you!
ekajeht 11 months ago
@PALOMITA694
I think I agree with you, but you are a fucking ass. Learn to debate and not be such a douche. Which was a form of birth control back in the day so I think I tied that up nicely.
JohnTightlips 11 months ago
@JohnTightlips You dont know how hard it is to make stubborn people understand the most logical facts of life.
PALOMITA694 11 months ago 3
@PALOMITA694
Well there is debating, acting like an ass, or moving on to some other area where you might be more affective. (Yes I know I used an "A"). The problem is some people have different definition on life.
JohnTightlips 11 months ago
@JohnTightlips It is good to have choices, being able to choose freely is priceless. Support America Pro-choice.
PALOMITA694 11 months ago 2
Yeah, more black kids, sounds great! :rolleyes:
WizzleThump 1 year ago
mjt19741 I am pro-life and i have been to the pro-life page that clcking on your name takes me to but .... the ultimate destination of Margaret Sanger's soul is up to god alone, and i am sure he sees more to her than her feminist politics. How can u call yourself pro-life when u want someone to burn forever? Do all racists burn in hell? what about all murderers, all blasphemers, all liars? Who does Jesus spend his Mwercy on according to you
LeonoraCohen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrChupacabraLoco Racism will get you nowhere.
mjt19741 1 year ago
I always wondered if Margaret Sanger was a racist. Now it is proven that she was racist. Now she is burning in hell.
mjt19741 1 year ago
@mjt19741
what does that have to do with today...no one is forcing ppl to have abortions and this has b,s written all over it
rhibac 1 year ago
@rhibac You can't say that no one is forcing women to have abortions today. At the abortion clinics, the counselors will brainwash them into thinking its ok. They will always make it sound perfect. They will always make it sound safe. Scientific facts have proven that it is much safer to have a natural birth. Alot of women that have abortions will hide that regret, some have hidden that regret as long as 50 years or longer. The power behind abortion is the money involved in it.
mjt19741 1 year ago
@mjt19741
llike i say to others BS you try to make this a race issue, the people who seek abortions do this to themselves not no stinking brainwashing doctors with out people seeking abortions they would not operate period they have no magic spells over people
adults make there own decisions i knew a woman who made her daughter get an abortion cause she was pregnant at 16.
of course they are gonna regret somewhere down the line when they cant have children anymore
rhibac 1 year ago
@rhibac
Women who murder their children deserve to have none.
Psalm119v50 10 months ago
@mjt19741
counselors at doctors offices or shall i say doctors influence you to take prescriptions that can very well kill you s by your logic.donor agencies counselors coach you or influence you to make a decision on being a donor/sponsor
thats what counselors are there for, if the counselors told these women there are risk etc it would not change a damn thing.
i also knew a woman who aborted her child cause the father was not going to be around making this decision on her own from jump
rhibac 1 year ago
@rhibac If you are so sure that you are right, then do 2 things. First go to an abortion clinic and ask the doctor/counselor about abortion. Second ask a pediatrition or an OBGYN that same question. Trust me, you will find a different answer.
mjt19741 1 year ago
@MrChupacabraLoco death to all pink and pale white TRASH !!
pabz10 1 year ago
@pabz10 WOW. Really?
metalgodess81 1 year ago
@AmericanPowerBase You're still at it huh racist?
yellowkrux 1 year ago
The lunatic fringe is taking over America.
eugenicsdebate 1 year ago
Defund Planned Parenthood now!
Nobama0000 1 year ago 7
@Nobama0000 Sure, defund planned parenthood.
Then afterward you can expect a raise in the birthrate, and feminine health problems in this country exponentially because none of us low income family women can afford to go to a normal OBGYN clinic to get checked for those problems, or to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Onitsu 10 months ago 3
@Onitsu It's funny. At any other time in history, a rise in birthrate would be considered a GOOD thing...
Patience1138 4 weeks ago
@Onitsu Generally, the way you prevent unwanted pregnancies is to keep your legs closed, problem solved. Maybe you should ask why PP targets low income minorities... perhaps the Democrats are trying to solve the country's exploding Welfare and Medicaid problem. Somehow there are more minority individuals and families on gov't handouts than European Americans ("white folk") even though they outnumber minorities 5 to 1 in America. Welfare pays mothers more money per child they pop out?!
huskerfraz 2 weeks ago
@Nobama0000 defund NPR while we're at it ,too. Stand with PP, NO F.ing way. PP= KKK without the sheets.
Cain/Palin2012
kevyster 9 months ago
hmm.... i'm disinclined to believe that there's any validity to claims made by fox news. especially claims being supported by video clips. they kinda have a history of running with bogus stuff. like saying a guy trying to get info about a human trafficking plot so he can report it is portrayed as engaging in said plot of fox news.... or the lady talking about how she overcame her own prejudice is portrayed as a racist on fox.
suicideluvkitty 1 year ago
imagine how topsy turvy the world would be if tumors and fetuses had more rights than sentient beings. wow! we may as well give rights to BEANS and ROSEBUSHES. fucking lunatics. rofl. "pro-lifers" (aka "pro-yakity-yak") are so fucking mental in the head, it's funny.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
Comment removed
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gee... how do we escape our own meaningless, out-of-control lives while controlling others at the same time in a thin veil of christianity? i know! let's force laws on people's own bodies instead of curing aids, improving the environment, fighting political corruption, etc. rather than improve the world, the christian thing to do is to control people and treat everyone around them like 3 year olds. good plan, nutjobs. ROFL.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
STOP SUPPORTING BARACK OBAMA! He is a supporter of Planned Parenthood and of the Eugenics movement! WAKE UP!
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed
no he is not, barack obama knows what he is talking about.
waffiki 1 year ago
@waffiki
No, he's a supporter of Planned parenthood and abortion, a supporter of genocide of innocent babies that don't get a choice on weather they're murdered or not.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed They aren't babies. Derp.
scythian0528 1 year ago
@scythian0528
Name calling now? Utterly pathetic. On abortion, some people say well if you get it at a certain stage it's okay, according to the law of biogenisis, all life comes from pre existing life, and each species reproduces after its own kind, human beings can only reproduce other human beings, so it doesn't start out as a different species and turn into a different species along the way.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@scythian0528
Well some people say well it's a a woman's body, it should be her choice; there's a 50% chance that her baby will be a male child, and he would have a penis, women don't have penises, so it's residing in her body, it's not part of her body. And the bottom line is I really believe if the unborn is not a human being have as many abortions as you want, no justification is necessary
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed That isn't the point. The idea is the mother is the landlord. The tenant can be rejected.
I agree with the bottom part.
scythian0528 1 year ago
@xtrashed "there's a 50% chance that her baby will be a male child, and he would have a penis, women don't have penises, so it's residing in her body, it's not part of her body."
there's a 50% chance you're a wacko too. lol.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
The point is is it's not part of her body, it's a human being.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed and the bigger point being that you can't define "life" and you're a dishonest little trollbag, bitch.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
BTVucla - I think you should ban a2gregjockca. He is a troll, and needs our prayers.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
Lets see you define life, you godless pro-abortion baby-killer. I'm dying to hear this, since its "above Obama's paygrade." When do we get human rights? If it is at birth, then how is a child born 8 months after conception more human than a child in the womb at 9 months after conception? There is no standard or basis for your beliefs that unborn children can be murdered, you "people" simply love getting your rocks off by bashing children's skulls in.
Psalm119v50 11 months ago
@xtrashed then cancer is a human being too. ROFL!!
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@xtrashed
If on the other hand the unborn is a human being no justification would be adequate, unless another human life is at risk, that being the mother's, but you wouldn't be acting to kill, you would be acting to save a life. Even if you don't share our faith, it's wrong to take a human life. The science on abortion is clear. There are two victims in abortion, the women do not need to be condemned, it's an issue that needs to be handled with love. Women are not given all the facts.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed
So you are are pro-choice if a woman is given all the facts?
scythian0528 1 year ago
@xtrashed prove that cancer cells aren't sentient then, wacko. if you can't, we should let people die of cancer too in your imaginary alien universe. rofl. you're so retarded it's funny!
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
You need to go and play outside.
xtrashed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
xtrashed: "You need to go and play outside."
--
scared of the reality, i see. you're a hypocrite. you think cancer cells are NOT living things but fetuses are. why? and you base your whole argument on separating a tumor from a fetus. cuz you're a confused nutcase, that's why. there is no difference. what allows a woman to have an abortion is the same reason why we're allowed to extract tumors. cuz we have a right to our own bodies, dumb backward hick.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@xtrashed Eugenics? Really? How so?
BigUnicornTits 1 year ago
@BigUnicornTits
Watch 'Maafa 21.' That's all I have to say.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed I meant how is it that Obama is a supporter of the Eugenics movement. I mean, plenty of people are (sadly) in favor of letting abortion be pretty freely available, but I doubt that many of them embrace eugenics.
BigUnicornTits 1 year ago
Comment removed
scythian0528 1 year ago
@xtrashed
Obama is a president.;must treat every one equal. and what he said is people have to make their own choice. God also gave us a choice.
support him and tell people to be careful not to abort; do you think he will get the vote to be a president if he only has to do what we want him to do?please think.
waffiki 1 year ago
@waffiki
I don't follow presidents or politicians, I follow God. Have you read the commandments; Thou Shall not kill. Babies are being killed in the womb, and women are not given all the facts on abortion either. And organizations like Planned Parenthood are protecting sex abuse from reported, look at channel: liveactionfilms
I do not stand in support of the culture of death, but the culture of life!
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed
i agree with you, that is not the point. they are misleading you so that you hate Obama, he said, if a woman is big enough to be pregnant, they make their decisions, he didn't say abort.
Obama is a president and he is trying to put the wrong write.and the conservatives are acting like us to destroy him, by accusing him saying he support abortion. u might be one of them who act like systematizing about PP to be against Obama.
waffiki 1 year ago
@waffiki
Look at the video on the sidebar, Obama addressing Planned Parenthood and even laughing. Look at the video at the top: Barack Obama and the Negro Project. He and his administration help to sponsor them, helping to continue the genocide of Black babies.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed If people believed that then I guess they'll believe anything. A person who was persecuted while growing up simply because he was black would want to end the black race? A person who doesn't care that he lets the whole world know he loves Basketball (Very popular sport in the Black community) instead of golf. Sound argument there buddy.
RumbleHD 11 months ago
@RumbleHD
What comment are you replying too?
xtrashed 11 months ago
@waffiki
I would rather vote for a conservative who wanted to end abortion, than a liberal Black person.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@waffiki
If the unborn baby is part of the body of the mother, I can't understand why the doctor has to count all of the little broken off arms and legs of the baby that are sucked out of the mother to make sure none are left inside. In fact if they leave any part of the dead baby inside the mother, she could die. Half of women carrying babies have a little boy inside them with a penis. Is that penis a part of her body? That would be a first.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@waffiki
I believe that as Christians we are obligated to step in. The Bible makes it clear that it is wrong to stand by as innocent blood is shed. (Deut 21:5, 7-9; Ezk 22:3-4, Is 1:15-16, Lev 18:21. ) Ruben rescued Joseph (Gn 37:21-22), Hebrew midwives rescued baby boys from the infanticide of Pharaoh (Ex 1:17) The solders of Saul rescued Jonathan from murder (1 Sam 14:45), Obadiah rescued 100 prophets from Jezebel. Esther risked her life to save her people from genocide.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed
they are wrong to abort....i am 100% with you. but Obama has nothing to do with PP.
waffiki 1 year ago
@waffiki
Look at the videos on Obama/Abortion on the sidebar.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed obama is an alien! omg! he's an evil extraterrestrial african american. scary! don't support him! he might eat our brains! EEK!
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
Don't patronize me.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed you're already patronized by yourself, bitch. lol. why don't you rejoin reality and stop contacting space aliens, okay cunt? thanks. bubbye now.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago
@a2gregjockca
I don't support abortion, why would I support someone who helps to fund the killing of Black children. Of all children.
xtrashed 1 year ago
@xtrashed nigger what? get the fuck outta here, cotton pixie. we don't need more children in the world, asshole. 6 billion is enough for fuck's sakes. instead of pretending to give a fuck about the world, try saving the children already BORN, like the ones dying of aids in africa? oh yeah, i forgot, you don't really give a fuck. you're just some mouthy broad with a fascist tendency telling people what to do instead of manning up and doing your own damn shit. you have no face, cunt. fuck u. LOL.
a2gregjockca 1 year ago