What are you talking about? That fact that it has one? Every digital video camera NEEDS one, or else, ya know, we would just see a white image the entire time from severe over-exposure. As it was shown, the Epic rolling shutter is far and away better than the 5D's is.
@lazlochatter yeah but these rolling shutters are too slow, I hate the jello-effect of these cmos sensors, trust me when it comes to capturing fast motion subject, even an old 90s ccd camera would gave better result.
Ah, well in that case I agree with you. I use a Panasonic HMC150 with the 3CCD sensor, and I hardly ever run into instances where rolling shutter is an issue. I thought you were just saying that the Epic is crap because it employs a rolling shutter :)
For shitty stuff like YouTube, sure. But when you're making The Hobbit, and you kind of need to capture all the extra detail, you're completely wrong. 5K, all day every day.
I still think this is a very Un-fair comparison considering the red series of cameras are pro theater-grade, Full-size $50,000 cameras i would take a 5D any day
This Kit IncludesBRAND NEW Canon EOS 60D Digital Camera BodyCanon 18-55mm IS LensCanon 55-250mm IS Lens500 Preset Lens w\ T-Mount for Canon.45x Wide Angle Lens2x Telephoto Lens16GB High Speed Memory Card - Class 10Extra Rechargeable BatteryDigital Pro Slave FlashAC\DC Rapid Car ChargerZeikos Camera CaseFull Size Professional ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
When you think about it in the long run, (depending on how much you plan to use the camera itself) the 5D MK11 sets a pretty good deal for indie film makers. Sure, its will probably burn a hole in your pocket the size of Texas, but the real point is that is brings down the standard pricing for a good quality image. Compared to the RED camera, it seems really cheap for such good quality, but it still worth a lot when it comes to no budget-ers. But if you love filming and making movies, save up.
you said canon lenses.... what lens did you use because that matters a whole lot? you cant compair the 5d mii with a 55k whatever camera with a kit lens.
Yeah, I'm probably going to but a Canon 5D markII so I can make videos for youtube, or to use it as a webcam. :p come on guys for how rich people is this video made! I think if you want to make a movie just for the web you can buy a lot cheaper camera's. Just buy a Nikon D90 and that is still expansive for just 'the web'
You know tv series are made with the canon 5D markII, a season of House is made with the MarkII!!!
What I am talking about is that a movie entitled 'Captain American, 'The First Avenger' was made with the 5D and its footage seemlessly mixed with with the footage of 35mm film coverage. I wonder if it is necessary to go to the expense of C300 or red epic even for cinema productions.
I have a question here to those who know more than me: I gather that 5K is a format for digital cinema screening. Is it true that you can convert footage from the 5D into the 5K format with the Sony Vegas Pro version?
@Drewza3462, Yes, I understand. It's the pixel count. The 5D has a 21 MP sensor whereas the Canon C300 I think is only 8MP. How does the 4-5K resolution work? Anyway, I am amazed that you would need a mega-expensive 5K digital camera with a large super 35 sensor to produce almost the same image quality on a large screen than a rather primitive and ancient little film box. .
Ok, maybe I am missing something, but the 5D was doing a great job. As a matter of fact I can't see the difference. Do I have problems with my eyesight?
@microaquarius Yes the 5D is is actually compressed an extra time more than the Epic. But because of all the compression, the difference isn't so noticeable. It only makes a big difference when you project on a big screen.
@KronikalProductions Thank you again. The pixel count makes sense for big screen application. However, I still try to work out why some professional filmmakers have chosen the 5D over an actual movie camera even for cinema screening? Maybe some of the quality will have to do with the quality of the lenses as well?
@KronikalProductions Well, I couldn't call a $3000.00 camera 'inexpensive', but that may be just a poor man's philosophy. I mean, to be able to afford a red epic to me is like someone discovering God on the other side of the periphery of the cosmos.
@microaquarius Even I couldn't call the 5D expensive but when you have a million dollar budget or more, 3000 isn't that much when compared to the Epic.
@KronikalProductions ok, but I am still trying to figure out why many professional filmmakers actually use DSLRs? If you are talking about pixel count etc, then maybe film would be a better option. I remember I used to shoot a movie, called 'Divided Passion' with my mates at High School using 1.00cm wide small format film and, boy, the resolution at billboard size was outstanding. The camera without saying way beyond industry standard.
The ones that have used the epic and canon 5d would be able to tell the difference between both of them when the footage reaches for the post. In post red epic footage takes a lot of time getting it to editing table where its finally cut into short film. But there is so much of stuff you can do in post with red footage that you would be surprised. You can completely change the way it looks correct your white balance or grey balance and then change ISO to lower value or higher and so forth.
@ToxicMediaNYC They did that in earlier episodes. Like years earlier. They even had an interview with a professor from full sail! Besides, the visuals are what make a movie. If you don't have good visuals in a movie, might as well have been a book
@HackingDutchman I'm not sure if film is measured in pixels, but you can get like a meh 35mm Film camera for around $1000-2000, and 35mm film can be stretched to anything from like 480p to 2k i believe. I would check another source if I was you though,
@HackingDutchman Sketchy camera brands, I'm really not an expert on this, i just did a quick search on google and a few cheap ones came up, but none from brands I recognized
Both are very good quality on youtube, though I find the red seems to have a nicer look to it, though the 5D might be more practical for online conversion.
Thanks for this, really interesting seeing this comparison, I've worked on both cameras before, I definitely prefer the performance of the 5d as it is much more reliable and intuitive to use.
its really doesnt matter how it looks it is more often the look your going the dark spots in the 5D can add that extra flair if you work the camera right
5 d got my vote! It looks like he moved the light in one scene to give the Red a better look, But I noticed it. the chair behind the guy was not light in one scene like the red was. Hollywood paid this guy, they don't want a bunch of indie film makers to get out there and flood the world with real creativity, as it would tap into their pockets. lol
some iditos tells " Red on big screen have a best result". Canon is the best electronic 16/35 mm electronic and with the difference of the price, RED is just a stupid toy for big production: Useless for the artist.
@vanhakaveri maybe you're right. A simple focus error about projector and the definition between a 1980 or 5k will disappear. You can simulate to your self a giant screen by to be close a 16/9 HD screen and looking result about 1080p. I can tell you 5K is useless.
I don't know why people are bringing the epic down, no youtuber buys a RED camera anyway. Put the raw footage in a theater and you will see the difference.
Like anything, you choose the right tool for the job.
Showing it on YouTube on 720p (or 1080p) - use a 5D and canon lenses. (Not least because it's easier to sink the sound) Showing it on the big screen, use RED and Zeiss lenses.
Want slow-mo? RED
Want very low light footage without adding much light? 5D
Don't have time or inclination for lots of colour correction? Probably 5D
...or basically, for web stuff, 5D; for cinema, RED. Easy!
The price of the RED and media cards and CPU to edit 5k is about 25 Times as expensive as 5d2. The image does NOT look 25 Times better thats fo sho! Unless you are peter jackson or james cameron dont even let the word RED enter your brain.
Thanks for helping me out with my short! i wish you guys could live with me everyday.lol. but i am really gonna miss you guys, o and i already uploaded the short. check it out, and thanks again for bringing the RED! ;)
There is simply no camera in that pricerange that even comes close to tha 5 fucking D! It's like the 5d is saying to all other camera's: "SUCK MY LENS"
So just was at the RED camera forum and there are so many ppl there that say 1080p is not professional that only 4k is.. wtf!! So sick of these ppl bashing 1080p and thinking that RED is the only pro camera out there, granted I luv RED cameras as much as the next person but come on...
If the film is good, will make it in the cinema, epic or no epic. A bigger problem to solve is a good script and execution. Very nice slo mo by the way cheers
@Ghostchaos1 may be because we own it .. well i am happy that 5D is compared with RED imagine the price... 2.5k and 55k dude. if 55K wont produce the result then ....
@Ghostchaos1 I think so to but if what pro movie makers are using the Red Epic then I might do it to. But, there are times were the 5D looks better and there are some times the Red Epic looks better. So, it all comes down to the lighting really.
What lenses were on the 5D and Epic? So when you finally get to youtube the 5D and Epic look essentially identical, certainly not $55K worth of difference. More than 2-years ago we proved the same with a Red, 5D and an unhacked GH1, the web, screen size and viewing distance are the great equalizers - IMAX also looks about the same as a 5D if you were wondering. Oh BTW, a hacked GH2 can be purchased for $999 or less.
@ShiiComp Regardless of compression, you are underlining my point. GH2 = to Epic, 35mm film or even IMAX on the internet. You might find enlightenment by reading the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem.
@LethargicBannanazZ Hey, sorry. I see what you mean, it's because his entire video got uploaded at like 12 fps for some reason. So every other frame is dropped. The whole video is like that, not just the slow mo. My bad, I forgot since I didn't watch it again before commenting.
You shouldn't have converted the EPIC footage. That takes away so much of it's advantage. EPIC R3D with REDcolor2 and Redlogfilm gamma space would have been incomparable to the 5D footage. Don't get me wrong, you guys still have the best filmmaking show on the entire Web.
cool ... what am i doing here? i cant even aford a 5d body ! . even if i sell mine :)
BisdremisKostas 12 hours ago 2
the link to go to the 5K footage bring me to someones youtube channel...
iCouldAppThat 23 hours ago
Whenever you get a piece of equipment that's used for film riot, you should have Gear Unboxing Mondays
Webcast01 1 day ago
fine on the small screen and I use 5D all the time but when shooting ads or if I want printable still it's the RED EPIC all the way.
pickersplayspop 2 days ago
red epic rolling shutter epic fail
SunnyShawFilms 3 days ago
@SunnyShawFilms
What are you talking about? That fact that it has one? Every digital video camera NEEDS one, or else, ya know, we would just see a white image the entire time from severe over-exposure. As it was shown, the Epic rolling shutter is far and away better than the 5D's is.
lazlochatter 22 hours ago
@lazlochatter yeah but these rolling shutters are too slow, I hate the jello-effect of these cmos sensors, trust me when it comes to capturing fast motion subject, even an old 90s ccd camera would gave better result.
SunnyShawFilms 13 hours ago
@SunnyShawFilms
Ah, well in that case I agree with you. I use a Panasonic HMC150 with the 3CCD sensor, and I hardly ever run into instances where rolling shutter is an issue. I thought you were just saying that the Epic is crap because it employs a rolling shutter :)
lazlochatter 13 hours ago
@shapeworkstudio1 final cut pro sucks they messed it up really bad get premier or avid
camerajuice 3 days ago
yay! top comment!
shapeworkstudios1 3 days ago
CANON 5d>RED EPIC
I mean if we look at the price and what each camera has to offer.
Bleacheddata 3 days ago
@Bleacheddata
For shitty stuff like YouTube, sure. But when you're making The Hobbit, and you kind of need to capture all the extra detail, you're completely wrong. 5K, all day every day.
lazlochatter 22 hours ago
I still think this is a very Un-fair comparison considering the red series of cameras are pro theater-grade, Full-size $50,000 cameras i would take a 5D any day
ethanharveytv 3 days ago
where is the test footage?
123456lars 4 days ago
PROMO LINK amzn.to\yKhVaX
Product Description
CANON CANON
This Kit IncludesBRAND NEW Canon EOS 60D Digital Camera BodyCanon 18-55mm IS LensCanon 55-250mm IS Lens500 Preset Lens w\ T-Mount for Canon.45x Wide Angle Lens2x Telephoto Lens16GB High Speed Memory Card - Class 10Extra Rechargeable BatteryDigital Pro Slave FlashAC\DC Rapid Car ChargerZeikos Camera CaseFull Size Professional ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
amzn.to\yKhVaX
BrewerRick1382 5 days ago
Clear thing the Red is better but it's like thrice as much as the 5d :D :D
SaFePointRecords 5 days ago
@SaFePointRecords uh, more like 12 times as much
shapeworkstudios1 5 days ago
@shapeworkstudios1 You're right :D :D
SaFePointRecords 3 days ago
When you think about it in the long run, (depending on how much you plan to use the camera itself) the 5D MK11 sets a pretty good deal for indie film makers. Sure, its will probably burn a hole in your pocket the size of Texas, but the real point is that is brings down the standard pricing for a good quality image. Compared to the RED camera, it seems really cheap for such good quality, but it still worth a lot when it comes to no budget-ers. But if you love filming and making movies, save up.
nikumokatsuru 5 days ago
press 4
ProxifyStudios 1 week ago
your link doesnt work! its giving another channel some extra views!!
hd50tyson1 1 week ago
The red is cheap for that kind of camera!!!
Fro7enDesigns 1 week ago
Comment removed
Fro7enDesigns 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you said canon lenses.... what lens did you use because that matters a whole lot? you cant compair the 5d mii with a 55k whatever camera with a kit lens.
benjaminjwilson6694 1 week ago
Comment removed
benjaminjwilson6694 1 week ago
Comment removed
jessemparker 2 weeks ago
U would like to see the Scaret vs the 5d mkii or t3i
FROMMYSTREETS 2 weeks ago
@FROMMYSTREETS scarlet is that same as the epic
bouchandre 2 weeks ago
you need to actually activate these links cause it doesn't work if i try to type it in
PetersFXfilms 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from filmriot
Why does this video look like it was shot at 10 fps? O.o
NummaKayne 2 weeks ago
Yeah, I'm probably going to but a Canon 5D markII so I can make videos for youtube, or to use it as a webcam. :p come on guys for how rich people is this video made! I think if you want to make a movie just for the web you can buy a lot cheaper camera's. Just buy a Nikon D90 and that is still expansive for just 'the web'
You know tv series are made with the canon 5D markII, a season of House is made with the MarkII!!!
aiktai 2 weeks ago
The link for the 5K footage: bit .ly/ qjwlJd (remove the spaces)
OliverWadeMusic 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
OliverWadeMusic 2 weeks ago
Watch in 720p, it looks horrible.
wtf
ByVxIJa 3 weeks ago
What I am talking about is that a movie entitled 'Captain American, 'The First Avenger' was made with the 5D and its footage seemlessly mixed with with the footage of 35mm film coverage. I wonder if it is necessary to go to the expense of C300 or red epic even for cinema productions.
microaquarius 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
corrocraft 3 weeks ago
i have seen this on leakedmovies . biz
fultonuyq 4 weeks ago
I have a question here to those who know more than me: I gather that 5K is a format for digital cinema screening. Is it true that you can convert footage from the 5D into the 5K format with the Sony Vegas Pro version?
microaquarius 4 weeks ago
@microaquarius I don't know much about it, but even though you convert to 5k, there won't be 2.5x the amount of pixels. This what I think, though.
KronikalProductions 4 weeks ago
@microaquarius 5K is the size of the video (like 1080p). There is no way you can turn the 5D footage into 5K.
Drewza3462 3 weeks ago
@Drewza3462, Yes, I understand. It's the pixel count. The 5D has a 21 MP sensor whereas the Canon C300 I think is only 8MP. How does the 4-5K resolution work? Anyway, I am amazed that you would need a mega-expensive 5K digital camera with a large super 35 sensor to produce almost the same image quality on a large screen than a rather primitive and ancient little film box. .
microaquarius 3 weeks ago
@microaquarius I have no idea what you're talking about
Drewza3462 3 weeks ago
Why not upload in 1080? Like the show. Please speak faster.
menschla 4 weeks ago in playlist Season 3
wait, ryan, you actually bought the red epic!!??
RatePage 1 month ago
@RatePage it was lent to him as a business thing.
hobocamptheater 4 weeks ago
Ok, maybe I am missing something, but the 5D was doing a great job. As a matter of fact I can't see the difference. Do I have problems with my eyesight?
microaquarius 1 month ago
@microaquarius That's because the footage was compressed twice. Once with exporting and once with uploading.
KronikalProductions 4 weeks ago
@KronikalProductions Ok, thanks, but wouldn't the same have applied with the 5D footage?
microaquarius 4 weeks ago
@microaquarius Yes the 5D is is actually compressed an extra time more than the Epic. But because of all the compression, the difference isn't so noticeable. It only makes a big difference when you project on a big screen.
KronikalProductions 4 weeks ago
@KronikalProductions Thank you again. The pixel count makes sense for big screen application. However, I still try to work out why some professional filmmakers have chosen the 5D over an actual movie camera even for cinema screening? Maybe some of the quality will have to do with the quality of the lenses as well?
microaquarius 4 weeks ago
@microaquarius I think some people use the 5D because it is small, lightweight and inexpensive if anything happens to it.
KronikalProductions 4 weeks ago
@KronikalProductions Well, I couldn't call a $3000.00 camera 'inexpensive', but that may be just a poor man's philosophy. I mean, to be able to afford a red epic to me is like someone discovering God on the other side of the periphery of the cosmos.
microaquarius 3 weeks ago
@microaquarius Even I couldn't call the 5D expensive but when you have a million dollar budget or more, 3000 isn't that much when compared to the Epic.
KronikalProductions 3 weeks ago
@KronikalProductions I agree. However, I would love to compare the movie quality from both cameras on a cinema screen.
microaquarius 3 weeks ago
@microaquarius That would be effective but the only way is to watch Act of Valor and something like The Hobbit.
KronikalProductions 3 weeks ago
@KronikalProductions ok, but I am still trying to figure out why many professional filmmakers actually use DSLRs? If you are talking about pixel count etc, then maybe film would be a better option. I remember I used to shoot a movie, called 'Divided Passion' with my mates at High School using 1.00cm wide small format film and, boy, the resolution at billboard size was outstanding. The camera without saying way beyond industry standard.
microaquarius 3 weeks ago
AHHHHHH! No link! I'm extremely interested in the epic footage. New link please.
nandolugofilms 1 month ago
Red epic shoots 15 times bigger frame (13 824 000 pixels) than what you can see here
(921 600).
vanhakaveri 1 month ago
The ones that have used the epic and canon 5d would be able to tell the difference between both of them when the footage reaches for the post. In post red epic footage takes a lot of time getting it to editing table where its finally cut into short film. But there is so much of stuff you can do in post with red footage that you would be surprised. You can completely change the way it looks correct your white balance or grey balance and then change ISO to lower value or higher and so forth.
binuishere 1 month ago
@ToxicMediaNYC They did that in earlier episodes. Like years earlier. They even had an interview with a professor from full sail! Besides, the visuals are what make a movie. If you don't have good visuals in a movie, might as well have been a book
nFnBjR 1 month ago
Does someone now a good FILM camera that does 60fps at 1080p and costs below 3000 euros?
HackingDutchman 1 month ago
@HackingDutchman I'm not sure if film is measured in pixels, but you can get like a meh 35mm Film camera for around $1000-2000, and 35mm film can be stretched to anything from like 480p to 2k i believe. I would check another source if I was you though,
nFnBjR 1 month ago
@nFnBjR Sorry, dont understand you fully, cant find the meh camera brand, or do you meaned the lens?
HackingDutchman 1 month ago
@HackingDutchman Sketchy camera brands, I'm really not an expert on this, i just did a quick search on google and a few cheap ones came up, but none from brands I recognized
nFnBjR 1 month ago
what program or plug-in you use for slow motion effect?
estudioamt 1 month ago
@estudioamt ANY that you can slow footage down, but he probably used after effects. Epic shoots in 300fps so you can easily slow that down.
vanhakaveri 1 month ago
what about the script and the story. start with that! then get a camera.
ToxicMediaNYC 1 month ago
Why is everybody saying 5d is better, THE EPIC IS WAAYYYYYYAYYYAYAYAYAYYYYYBLLSBALRGFFDCJOUCFJ BETTER!
zttvs 1 month ago
Both are very good quality on youtube, though I find the red seems to have a nicer look to it, though the 5D might be more practical for online conversion.
ToxicFlavouredCandy 1 month ago
Thanks for this, really interesting seeing this comparison, I've worked on both cameras before, I definitely prefer the performance of the 5d as it is much more reliable and intuitive to use.
RedWindFilms 1 month ago
dud ... in indonesia java language epic is meaning good ( bagus )
Pamungkaserdo 1 month ago
its really doesnt matter how it looks it is more often the look your going the dark spots in the 5D can add that extra flair if you work the camera right
TheFilesProduction 1 month ago
5D looks better and sharper, there is no contest
RichyzVlogs 1 month ago
5 d got my vote! It looks like he moved the light in one scene to give the Red a better look, But I noticed it. the chair behind the guy was not light in one scene like the red was. Hollywood paid this guy, they don't want a bunch of indie film makers to get out there and flood the world with real creativity, as it would tap into their pockets. lol
bobbywashington 1 month ago
5D looks a Lot better to me ! dunno why are you parsing the RED a lot ?!
donofthekuwait 1 month ago
5D Mark II is a phenomenal camera and personally... I think it looks better on here. Just me though.
ZildjianDrummer244 1 month ago
GUYS! Here is a working link for the 5k footage! bit(DOT)ly/qjwlJd
bequinta1 1 month ago
wait does he own a red or is it rented?
shapeworkstudios1 1 month ago
Canon employee's disliked the video!
thecooler335 1 month ago
adobe > final cut & vegas :D
shapeworkstudios1 1 month ago 15
@shapeworkstudios1 eh. final cut is better then premiere, but Id choose adobe for everything else.
slowgold20 5 days ago
@shapeworkstudios1 ehh final cut & Adobe > iMovie/Vegas/WMM/Cyberlink Etc.
ethanharveytv 3 days ago
The only thing that I see that the Red Epic has over the 5D is dynamic range and noise advantage.
ICEx03 1 month ago
did they shoot this with a the EPIC or a 5D.
MunkeeMedia 2 months ago
@MunkeeMedia If it was a 5D would you then say it was Biased? LOL
Ocacia 1 month ago
you talk way too fast, i switched off, use fewer words and maybe you'll get your point over more concisely :)
altern8ive 2 months ago
i came here to listen to some music........ this isn't music
Iksario 2 months ago
Ryan, please make another link for the 5K footage. It does not work!
slushfilmz 2 months ago 49
some iditos tells " Red on big screen have a best result". Canon is the best electronic 16/35 mm electronic and with the difference of the price, RED is just a stupid toy for big production: Useless for the artist.
CocktaiLMolotovX 2 months ago
@CocktaiLMolotovX Difference of 1080p and 5K in movie theater is like comparing 240p and 1080p in you tube :)
vanhakaveri 1 month ago
@vanhakaveri maybe you're right. A simple focus error about projector and the definition between a 1980 or 5k will disappear. You can simulate to your self a giant screen by to be close a 16/9 HD screen and looking result about 1080p. I can tell you 5K is useless.
CocktaiLMolotovX 1 month ago
Don't waste your time, go directly to 03:53 .
CocktaiLMolotovX 2 months ago
I don't know why people are bringing the epic down, no youtuber buys a RED camera anyway. Put the raw footage in a theater and you will see the difference.
PKnSTUFF 2 months ago
@PKnSTUFF Exactly, you'll see in on big screens.
FIFAComedyOriginals 2 months ago
5d looks like a film, epic looks like haloy and bright, is it thousands of dollars better looking HELL NO!!
Anoon 2 months ago
Ghostchaos1 the 5d has better color
filmer3000 2 months ago
sink? sync!
andycollier99 2 months ago
Like anything, you choose the right tool for the job.
Showing it on YouTube on 720p (or 1080p) - use a 5D and canon lenses. (Not least because it's easier to sink the sound) Showing it on the big screen, use RED and Zeiss lenses.
Want slow-mo? RED
Want very low light footage without adding much light? 5D
Don't have time or inclination for lots of colour correction? Probably 5D
...or basically, for web stuff, 5D; for cinema, RED. Easy!
andycollier99 2 months ago 4
@andycollier99 Phantom Gold is for good slow-mo, not Red.
WolvesOfEurope 1 week ago
I think the main point to get out of this video is that the 5D looks 98% as good as the RED EPIC on 720p at 5% of the price.
intrigid 3 months ago
links broken, took me to some other youtube channel
jewlouds 3 months ago
link to that footage doesn't work anymore.
Ziakalyan 3 months ago
This makes me love my 5D even more!
smutbubble 3 months ago 15
@smutbubble me too!!!! :)
MrIliaskapa 3 months ago
Epic and 5D would be so awesome to have both of them!
MichaelXhardcore 3 months ago
Meh. I think ill get an FS100...
TheConnorBerge 3 months ago
What's the music used during Bruno's tortures? Sounds awesome! Please reply :-)
vocazone 3 months ago
The price of the RED and media cards and CPU to edit 5k is about 25 Times as expensive as 5d2. The image does NOT look 25 Times better thats fo sho! Unless you are peter jackson or james cameron dont even let the word RED enter your brain.
zebrastriper1 3 months ago
THAT WAS NOT 300 FPS! LMAO AND DEF NOT RED
zebrastriper1 3 months ago
Thanks for helping me out with my short! i wish you guys could live with me everyday.lol. but i am really gonna miss you guys, o and i already uploaded the short. check it out, and thanks again for bringing the RED! ;)
NorWichProds 3 months ago
There is simply no camera in that pricerange that even comes close to tha 5 fucking D! It's like the 5d is saying to all other camera's: "SUCK MY LENS"
TiborCsuprik 3 months ago 2
why no 1080 :D
crockerfilm 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So just was at the RED camera forum and there are so many ppl there that say 1080p is not professional that only 4k is.. wtf!! So sick of these ppl bashing 1080p and thinking that RED is the only pro camera out there, granted I luv RED cameras as much as the next person but come on...
rbnodvd 3 months ago
if i had a 1$ for a every view this video got i still wont be able to afford The Red Epic!!!!!!!!!!
CrackedPad 3 months ago
What do you use for your 300fps footage?
v12tommy 4 months ago
720p and a terrible framerate...what happened to this video? =/
Harry101UK 4 months ago
....rolling shutter?I feel stupid but I HAD to ask. What's a rolling shutter? Brief description please :D
clementeen 4 months ago
@clementeen
wikipedia
tikkukko 4 months ago
If the film is good, will make it in the cinema, epic or no epic. A bigger problem to solve is a good script and execution. Very nice slo mo by the way cheers
antonpictures 4 months ago
NOO! THE LINK ISNT WORKING! PLEASE FIX!
ThisUsernamePwnsBTW 4 months ago
U have a bias toward the Red
Jackson9797 5 months ago
This guy talks so fast I'm getting a headache.
JD1886 5 months ago 2
what's the torturing bruno song?
rsmoz 5 months ago
link didn't work, what am I doing wrong?
raredreamfootage 5 months ago
Why did you upload to YouTube at 720p?
AccidentalBroadcast 5 months ago
@filmriot Youtube allows uploads with a resolution of 4K now. Use that!
joeynessily 5 months ago
how do u add screen bars to a movie in after effects?
Jayronimo123 5 months ago
5D footage looks comparable if not better....5D FTW!
dgatan 5 months ago
Demon Sky FTW! --- Sent From filmriot's AppRats (Facebook App)!
TheGruntone 5 months ago
What song do they use in the Torture segment?
LoVeMeNoT555 5 months ago
what happened to the link?
jmdemelkon 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9:23 - they pour water into his ass and it comes out of his mouth
iolo26 5 months ago
5D looks better to me for somereason
Ghostchaos1 5 months ago 29
@Ghostchaos1 may be because we own it .. well i am happy that 5D is compared with RED imagine the price... 2.5k and 55k dude. if 55K wont produce the result then ....
mmughal77 5 months ago
@Ghostchaos1 Yeah in the colour corrected shot of the guy lying down, I thought the epic still looked a bit milky.
Morrgore 5 months ago
@Ghostchaos1 yeah and the price sounds better to :P
LeighDdrumDalton 3 months ago
@Ghostchaos1 The 5D does look better!
wordupmag 2 months ago
@Ghostchaos1 cuz you can afford one...
ILLaMENT268 2 months ago
@Ghostchaos1 I think so to but if what pro movie makers are using the Red Epic then I might do it to. But, there are times were the 5D looks better and there are some times the Red Epic looks better. So, it all comes down to the lighting really.
DragonGernade 2 months ago
can be seen at v i m e o 6530150
HotRodCameras 5 months ago
What lenses were on the 5D and Epic? So when you finally get to youtube the 5D and Epic look essentially identical, certainly not $55K worth of difference. More than 2-years ago we proved the same with a Red, 5D and an unhacked GH1, the web, screen size and viewing distance are the great equalizers - IMAX also looks about the same as a 5D if you were wondering. Oh BTW, a hacked GH2 can be purchased for $999 or less.
HotRodCameras 5 months ago 7
@HotRodCameras Internet video is super compressed, you can't really judge on youtube.
ShiiComp 3 months ago in playlist Season 3
@ShiiComp Regardless of compression, you are underlining my point. GH2 = to Epic, 35mm film or even IMAX on the internet. You might find enlightenment by reading the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem.
HotRodCameras 3 months ago
@HotRodCameras gh2 sucksss
xxbluejay21 3 months ago
@xxbluejay21 Obviously, you're not qualified to offer an opinion. GH2 is best bang for buck available today.
HotRodCameras 3 months ago
@HotRodCameras just looked at your channel. you think you're qualified? LOLOL. GH2 SUCKS.
xxbluejay21 3 months ago
@HotRodCameras oh i'm sorry. I have nothing to say after watching that amazing movie on your channel. LUL. GH2 sucks. Fact.
xxbluejay21 2 months ago
@xxbluejay21 Failboat. GH2 pwns Canon. Truth.
polishcomedy 2 months ago
2:15 , whats the song name please?
CraiovaStudio 5 months ago
@CraiovaStudio idk but i think its dubstep
closeupboard562 3 months ago
Wish I had $60000 dollars to waste
TheTLTLHeadquarters 5 months ago
thumbs up for the Milky!
AdventuresOfMrQuest 5 months ago in playlist More videos from filmriot
5k video on 720p on youtube haha i love it. XD
brandonhughes7 5 months ago in playlist More videos from filmriot
wheres the link????
SaiyanG2 5 months ago
when i go to the 5k footage it takes me to a youtubers channel
MitchBarlett 5 months ago 2
@MitchBarlett same
JKillaMusic 5 months ago
@MitchBarlett same thing happened to me also ....
sye005 5 months ago
why does the fps look so choppy?
Webcast01 6 months ago
@Webcast01 You mean for the 300 fps parts? Cause they play it back at less than 24 fps to make it look slower.
iSOBigD 5 months ago
@iSOBigD no. Like the hosting segments.
Webcast01 5 months ago
Duplicate the layer and change to overlay and about 50% opacity
OneCompHelp 6 months ago
I kinda prefer the uncorrected footage from the epic
neekface 6 months ago
i vote they start uploading videos in 1080p
ChillaxedJosh 6 months ago
tim is back!
EinErmino 6 months ago
ryan I don't mean to be rude, but at 300 fps the slow motion is pretty choppy you probably should of used twixtor or kronos.
LethargicBannanazZ 6 months ago
Comment removed
tynaqofficial 6 months ago
@tynaqofficial I am trting to say that the slow mo was disappointing. I thought with 300 fps you could go a lot slower and get it to be very smooth.
LethargicBannanazZ 6 months ago
@LethargicBannanazZ Hey, sorry. I see what you mean, it's because his entire video got uploaded at like 12 fps for some reason. So every other frame is dropped. The whole video is like that, not just the slow mo. My bad, I forgot since I didn't watch it again before commenting.
Cakeman545 6 months ago
You shouldn't have converted the EPIC footage. That takes away so much of it's advantage. EPIC R3D with REDcolor2 and Redlogfilm gamma space would have been incomparable to the 5D footage. Don't get me wrong, you guys still have the best filmmaking show on the entire Web.
Cakeman545 6 months ago
RYAN IS A YOUTUBE AD NOT JUST A FILM RIOT AD!!! HAHA CONGRATS! the moola must be rolling in nicely.
Engleflix 6 months ago
I got a nerdgasm when I was color correcting the 5K footage.. It was a breeze and it looked EPIC. (Ryan has an updated link on the filmriot twitter)
MrNuun 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
link doesnt work...
pcx781 6 months ago
Not even a challenge haha EPic Wins.
VidPro95 6 months ago