How can anyone support Thatcher when she openly defends Pinochet and called him a friend? That man was responsible for the murder and torture of thousands of Chileans. When visitng London in 1998 Pinochet was arrested for Human rights violations and Thatcher fought for his release. When he died she said that she was 'greatly saddened'. These facts alone demonstrate what a disgusting individual she is.
Murder and torture of thousands of COMMUNISTS. Of course I oppose statemurder and torture, but I wonder what the ammount of suffering would have been if the communists would have taken over Chile. But naturally thinking is too much to ask from a left-wing looney.
No, not COMMUNISTS-innocent people that dared to criticise the removal of democracy in favour of a brutal free-market dictatorship which brought economic ruin on the country. And even people that didn't. Why are Americans so obsessed by Communism? Chile had NOTHING to do with Communism. It was a SOCIALIST, democratic state beforehand, and very successful too. Huge difference. Pinochet made it a bloody military dictatorship. Get your facts right.
No, not COMMUNISTS-innocent people that dared to criticise the removal of democracy in favour of a brutal free-market dictatorship which brought economic ruin on the country. And even people that didn't. Why are Americans so obsessed by Communism? Chile had NOTHING to do with Communism. It was a SOCIALIST, democratic state beforehand, and very successful too. Huge difference. Pinochet made it a bloody military dictatorship. Get your facts right.
You really do show how ignorant and stupid Americans actually are.Hahahahaha-I'm a member of the British Labour party, and if you knew anything at all you wouldn't say that. You really do show how ignorant and stupid Americans actually are
What happened after Thatcher proves the point - when Labour finally came to power they chose to keep a lot of her policies unchanged...why? Obviously they worked. They call her the PM that changed the way not one but two parties think. Liberals are all too often incapable of putting logical workable decisions before their emotions, and that's why we need great leaders like her to come in every now and again and rectify things. Sad we don't have her in power now...
ah ah ah ah ah....you do FORGET Mrs. Thatcher and her mentor Sir Keith Joseph both considered themselves Liberals in the sense of Classical Liberalism... even the economic theorists Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek claimed to be "Whigs". Mrs.Thatcher once said "If Mr.Gladstone was alive today he would vote Conservative"
I wasn't really feel all that negative about former US Senator Fred Thompson in spite of being a "leftist Democrat." (My leftist politics make Hillary Rodham Clinton look like Newt Gingrich in comparison). But two things made me really appalled about Fred Thompson. One, his insult toward Michael Moore in the video commentary about "Sicko." He seemed to me like a bully. Two, his praising of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
Ah, right, and you would be an AMERICAN. So you have precisely no idea what Mrs T did for (or to?!) my country. Simply put, fuck off, you arrogant, cocksure, stateside-stylem lefty (fake) little prick.
And do help your 'countrypersons' vote for a less psychotic president than the latest version of 'Bush' when you find you have the time (while you're not busy making money out of poor people, that is).
Margaret Thatcher auctioned off state runned enterprises to predators. She harrassed the brave SOCIALIST Councillors called "The Liverpool 47." Her government attacked innocent/striking miners. In 1990, she attempted to impose the Poll Tax and attacked protesters. I am an American who support the "(OLD) Labour-socialism" of Clement Atlee, Tony Benn, and Michael Foot; and I do so without apology...
You do so without a vote. Worry about the US and its inequalities because you have precisely no clue what you are talking about when you talk about Britain. Whatever it is you think you know you need to double check, preferably from reliable - and impartial - sources. If you're capable of being impartial, that is - which I seriously doubt. Better still, stay out of it.
I don't take orders from ANY conservatives. Whenever I want to, I'll read about and comment on anything I want to. You are the first person that says I know nothing about Britain. For starters, Thatcher certainly screwed over the people of Britain in the 1980s. Maybe you should tell Fred Thompson not mind his affairs instead of visiting the Milk Snatcher.
Again, a poverty of information combined with a seriously bizarre sense of self-importance generates this idea that you can know what it was to be British in those days. That's disturbed. You have absolutely no right to comment on the political history of my country. Ever.
You are rediculous. I have every right to comment about anything I want. The point to the matter is that you don't agree with me, and that's fine. There is no self importance coming from my part, just plain observation instead.
Fair enough. I take your points and I apologise for wading in (didn't really mean most of it, in truth). I just felt you were being blunt and rather superficial about things that people in this country take very seriously and cherish.
Sometimes a view external to a situation is the one that has any clarity and lacks bias. It is ridiculous to say you can't comment on the politics of a country because you don't live there. It is inward thinking, conservative ideas like that which drag Britain down.
Milk Snatcher! Good god how pathetic. In fact as Cabinet minuets show Maggie was against the decision to end free milk but was bound by collective Cabinet responsibility.
My dear punkish sir, It absolutely amazing that you make certain claims. First of all, she limited the political machine which controled many miners, the unions. She also beat the argentinans in the Falkland War. She debated and beat her opposition as befits the Iron Lady. Btw, none of those "great" men you speak of have any nicknames....in fact, they are forgotten by history.
You clearly have no understanding of what things were like in Britian before Maggie. Inflation at over 10% & out of control, militant unions running a tyrrany of the minority. Those innocent miners were quite happy to let businesses go broke, people freeze in their homes-just so long as their wages wernt cut. She saved Britians economy & under her 90% of people were richer.
LOL how old are you 5? What are you saying, that every book written on the period newspaper & programme from the period & person that can remember it are lying. Except of course the morning star & socialist worker. Infaltion was over 10% Fact. Unions were running the country as their feifdom Fact. 90% were better off under Maggie (even the BBC admits that one). She saved our country.
She sold of state enterprises that were hemoraging money to keep a minority in useless jobs. She attacked the Moronic Liverpool councillers who wanted the successful south to bankroll their industrial wonderland. Sure the poll tax was a mistake, but not as big a mistake as all the policies of the idiot Foot. Oh & btw learn about Labour, the policies of Clem were soft compared to the ultra-leftism of Foot & Benn. They were very different.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Margaret Thatcher was bad for Britain. There's nothing useless about the trade union movement. They were 100% justified to fight her all the way during the 1980s especially with the Coal Miner Strikes. What she did to the Liverpool 47 was criminal. She was totally awful, and there are plenty of people in the UK that despises her to this day. When I think of the wonderful and needed reforms of the Clement Atlee government and her nasty policies, there just isn't any comparison.
When Thatcher came to power inflation was rampent, the economy was going down the tubes. The miners were able to hold the majority of the people to ransom to ensure that their jobs were subsidised. She saved the economy and created the Britain there is today. Without her the standard of living for everyone would be MUCH lower & thousands would still be without there own homes. There is a clear comparison-Clems reforms started the rot, Maggies solved it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Had it not been for Clement Atlee's reforms, Britain would sink to the poverty level of the United States whereby there is wage war to the bottom, a tattered safety net, a virtually non-existent trade union movement, and people dying due to medical inflation. I only hope that the British Labour Party can govern once again as a "socialist-party," not as a vehicle for "Neo-Thatcherism." I am hardly militant, but the humane values of social democracy far exceeds the cruelty of the market.
Most of Attlees reforms were simply from the Beveridge report-these would have been enacted by the Tories, they werent socialist ideals but liberal ones. The only original Lab. reforms were nationalisation & centralisation. The two things that destroyed the British economy. Look at the economy in 79, thats what socialism does-mass unemployment high inflation-its worse for EVERYONE. A rising tide lifts all boats, Britain has proved this as a fact. Thank god Socialism is dead.
I am familiar with the Beveridge Report, and this makes it ironically possible that if Winston Churchill's Tories would have governed between 1945-1951, some of those reforms would have been instituted anyway like national healthcare and the welfare state. Britain, neverthless, did very well in the 1950s & 60s. Economy goes in cycles, and the energy crises made life horrible for most democracies in the 1970s including the UK. I stand by what I was thought of the Thatcher years.
"some of those reforms would have been instituted"-That is exactly what I said. However Labours fatal nationalisation wouldnt have. "Britain did well in the 60s". relative to what? Relative to other western nations it didnt. During the 60s British industry declined and growth was slow. Yes there were external factors in the 70s, But Labs policies made things worse, the only way to fix the probs was Thatcherism. What would U have had done? Left things as they were? That was tried and didnt work.
Can Fred Thompson actually see anything around him? I ask that because it must be extrememly dark where he is, you know, forever up Maggie Thatcher's backside. Mike S.
Let's go WAY back...the American Civil War was won by the North. That victory achieved 2 things - One: The end of Slavery; Two: The preservation of the Union.
Yet, 100 years later and counting, it is the South that has given us the most presidents, to the extent that one might suspect that the CIVIL WAR is yet being fought to this day. Why do our presidents come from there and why does the SOUTH exercise such political might?
That's neoliberalism, and I reject it. Thompson is a globalist, as he said JUST now himself.
Fred Thompson was a MEMBER of the Council of Foreign Relations that WROTE the plan to create the North American Union! Dick Cheney was a director! Same with John McCain! Explains his amnesty position!
Senator Fred Thompson took money from American Gun Owners and from second amendment rights groups and then voted against Gun Owners 14 times.
Fred Thompson was a lobbyist for abortionists.
Ron Paul is strongly pro-life and A+ rated by Gun Owners of America. And Ron Paul got more donations from military personnel in the second quarter than any other candidate.
Don't waste your vote on dipshit fred thompson. He's a corporate sellout. There's a reason why cultural marxist(left-wing fox news) wants him to be president. Ron Paul is a REAL REPUBLICan in the vein of the founders + he will end the fed reserve scam + Irs. No more fed income tax each year. Ron Paul is a 9 year republican and will restore greatness to this country once and for all. Stop the corporations' choices for president like thompson, obama and hilary.
if youtube is to continue to exist as a WORLD FORUM it must post EVERYTHING, and CENSOR nothing. That most of the comments on everything from music videos to innocent video BLOGS are rife with profanity is, alas, merely a symptom of our culture, such as it is, but as with all things, from time to time the truth will eventually seep through. So, YOUTUBE folks, think of the consequences before making mine, or others' comment INCONSEQUENTIAL. Thank you.
david,"this post will be posted..etc" Is most annoying.I normally come across this on videos for far-right/nazi groups.why do these people fear debate?youtube is a great thing as it is a world forum if the price for that is having to put up with racists/bigots. As much as it pains me,so be it.
Mr. Senator: if you think you are some sort of alternative to the other republican nabobs, think again. those few of us who care about such things have your number. so go back from whence you came and leave us in peace. you are an a*****e through and through. what do you think?
Duncan Hunter for President 2008. Support a genuine conservative. Duncan Hunter is actively campaigning on a platform of strong national defense, enforceable borders, and core conservative values.
I would never vote for anyone who molested children. And I would never vote for Fred Thompson either. Its time to put "Mark Foley" politics to rest. Us conservatives need to send creepy uncle Thompson back to his Amnesty-loving Hollywood home, before he turns our great nation into California.
davideley,When I first began 'posting'I assumed the same as you.I'm sure the truth is occasionally youtube 'looses' posts.I would imagine it's a 'computer' thing rather than a 'post' thing.Some of the (libelous!)comments I have read I'm positive no censoring takes place.Regards Mpandi
one never knows anymore about anything in this country. one thing you CAN count on is that nothing is as it SEEMS. sounds a bit paranoid? perhaps. but in my day the lies they told to get elected never went SO deep. what do you think?
david.Youtube does have censorship!whilst you can watch violence, nazi/racist rants even executions(Saddams)and I'm sure worse I haven't came across yet.Youtube will not allow nudity!I can't except that Saddam's hanging is acceptable yet naked people are not.I have always assumed this to be an 'American thing'as I'm sure if youtube was European it would be the other way round.What do you think.Regards Mpandi
Fred Thompson is a hypocrite. We would not have 12 to 20 million illegals if you would not have contributed to an "open borders" immigration when you were in the Senate. This is why Americans for Better Immigration gave you a grade of "C". America has had enough rhetoric from political hypocrites. Stay on TV and stop "acting" like you're a conservative you fraud.
Fred Thompson is now on the record as saying that he will SLASH Social Security to those currently on it. People are already having to make the hard choices between food, rent, and medicine with what little Social Security they get each month, and now this Hillbilly Frankenstein wants to suffocate them even MORE by cutting it back further. I can't believe anyone can be so inhuman to those who are already helpless, and I can't believe how inhumane people can be by supporting this abomination!
I read days ago that Snoozin's campaign planned this media stunt to shore up Dr. Fred's image of experience with foreign affairs. Fred work on the poker face--at least tell us the truth. Don't make a public speech, wrap yourself in Thatcher's skirt, and then say you found about the strategy to look like Reagan a few minutes into the speech.
How can anyone support Thatcher when she openly defends Pinochet and called him a friend? That man was responsible for the murder and torture of thousands of Chileans. When visitng London in 1998 Pinochet was arrested for Human rights violations and Thatcher fought for his release. When he died she said that she was 'greatly saddened'. These facts alone demonstrate what a disgusting individual she is.
billybobtp 3 years ago
Murder and torture of thousands of COMMUNISTS. Of course I oppose statemurder and torture, but I wonder what the ammount of suffering would have been if the communists would have taken over Chile. But naturally thinking is too much to ask from a left-wing looney.
CrackerXZ 3 years ago
No, not COMMUNISTS-innocent people that dared to criticise the removal of democracy in favour of a brutal free-market dictatorship which brought economic ruin on the country. And even people that didn't. Why are Americans so obsessed by Communism? Chile had NOTHING to do with Communism. It was a SOCIALIST, democratic state beforehand, and very successful too. Huge difference. Pinochet made it a bloody military dictatorship. Get your facts right.
hugoegbert79 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No, not COMMUNISTS-innocent people that dared to criticise the removal of democracy in favour of a brutal free-market dictatorship which brought economic ruin on the country. And even people that didn't. Why are Americans so obsessed by Communism? Chile had NOTHING to do with Communism. It was a SOCIALIST, democratic state beforehand, and very successful too. Huge difference. Pinochet made it a bloody military dictatorship. Get your facts right.
hugoegbert79 2 years ago
British Labour Party = polite communists without AK-47s or "re-education" camps
DDT1968 3 years ago 5
You really do show how ignorant and stupid Americans actually are.Hahahahaha-I'm a member of the British Labour party, and if you knew anything at all you wouldn't say that. You really do show how ignorant and stupid Americans actually are
hugoegbert79 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thatcher is a cold-hearted lump of filth.Simple as that.She created the very greedy,selfish and uncaring society we now live in.Rot in hell.
PeteGeeza86 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hate that bitch thatcher. hope she rots in hell
Jack63815 3 years ago
CRAP SPEECH no wonder you quit you old goat
kmarkymark 3 years ago
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!
numberstation 4 years ago
What happened after Thatcher proves the point - when Labour finally came to power they chose to keep a lot of her policies unchanged...why? Obviously they worked. They call her the PM that changed the way not one but two parties think. Liberals are all too often incapable of putting logical workable decisions before their emotions, and that's why we need great leaders like her to come in every now and again and rectify things. Sad we don't have her in power now...
Nabopolassor 4 years ago
ah ah ah ah ah....you do FORGET Mrs. Thatcher and her mentor Sir Keith Joseph both considered themselves Liberals in the sense of Classical Liberalism... even the economic theorists Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek claimed to be "Whigs". Mrs.Thatcher once said "If Mr.Gladstone was alive today he would vote Conservative"
Tenkensoujiro666 4 years ago
She was a great Prime Minister and transformed Britain for the better.
wed1979 4 years ago 9
Exactly.
ludocrat 4 years ago
I wasn't really feel all that negative about former US Senator Fred Thompson in spite of being a "leftist Democrat." (My leftist politics make Hillary Rodham Clinton look like Newt Gingrich in comparison). But two things made me really appalled about Fred Thompson. One, his insult toward Michael Moore in the video commentary about "Sicko." He seemed to me like a bully. Two, his praising of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
PsychoPunk1965 4 years ago
Ah, right, and you would be an AMERICAN. So you have precisely no idea what Mrs T did for (or to?!) my country. Simply put, fuck off, you arrogant, cocksure, stateside-stylem lefty (fake) little prick.
And do help your 'countrypersons' vote for a less psychotic president than the latest version of 'Bush' when you find you have the time (while you're not busy making money out of poor people, that is).
ludocrat 4 years ago
Margaret Thatcher auctioned off state runned enterprises to predators. She harrassed the brave SOCIALIST Councillors called "The Liverpool 47." Her government attacked innocent/striking miners. In 1990, she attempted to impose the Poll Tax and attacked protesters. I am an American who support the "(OLD) Labour-socialism" of Clement Atlee, Tony Benn, and Michael Foot; and I do so without apology...
PsychoPunk1965 4 years ago
You do so without a vote. Worry about the US and its inequalities because you have precisely no clue what you are talking about when you talk about Britain. Whatever it is you think you know you need to double check, preferably from reliable - and impartial - sources. If you're capable of being impartial, that is - which I seriously doubt. Better still, stay out of it.
ludocrat 4 years ago
I don't take orders from ANY conservatives. Whenever I want to, I'll read about and comment on anything I want to. You are the first person that says I know nothing about Britain. For starters, Thatcher certainly screwed over the people of Britain in the 1980s. Maybe you should tell Fred Thompson not mind his affairs instead of visiting the Milk Snatcher.
PsychoPunk1965 4 years ago
Again, a poverty of information combined with a seriously bizarre sense of self-importance generates this idea that you can know what it was to be British in those days. That's disturbed. You have absolutely no right to comment on the political history of my country. Ever.
ludocrat 4 years ago
You are rediculous. I have every right to comment about anything I want. The point to the matter is that you don't agree with me, and that's fine. There is no self importance coming from my part, just plain observation instead.
PsychoPunk1965 4 years ago 2
Fair enough. I take your points and I apologise for wading in (didn't really mean most of it, in truth). I just felt you were being blunt and rather superficial about things that people in this country take very seriously and cherish.
ludocrat 4 years ago
Ok I agree with u on that one ;)
dbww 3 years ago
Sometimes a view external to a situation is the one that has any clarity and lacks bias. It is ridiculous to say you can't comment on the politics of a country because you don't live there. It is inward thinking, conservative ideas like that which drag Britain down.
billybobtp 3 years ago
Milk Snatcher! Good god how pathetic. In fact as Cabinet minuets show Maggie was against the decision to end free milk but was bound by collective Cabinet responsibility.
dbww 3 years ago 2
My dear punkish sir, It absolutely amazing that you make certain claims. First of all, she limited the political machine which controled many miners, the unions. She also beat the argentinans in the Falkland War. She debated and beat her opposition as befits the Iron Lady. Btw, none of those "great" men you speak of have any nicknames....in fact, they are forgotten by history.
GO MAGGIE THATCHER!!!
Darthenergizer 4 years ago
You clearly have no understanding of what things were like in Britian before Maggie. Inflation at over 10% & out of control, militant unions running a tyrrany of the minority. Those innocent miners were quite happy to let businesses go broke, people freeze in their homes-just so long as their wages wernt cut. She saved Britians economy & under her 90% of people were richer.
dbww 4 years ago
thats not true you liar
kmarkymark 3 years ago
LOL how old are you 5? What are you saying, that every book written on the period newspaper & programme from the period & person that can remember it are lying. Except of course the morning star & socialist worker. Infaltion was over 10% Fact. Unions were running the country as their feifdom Fact. 90% were better off under Maggie (even the BBC admits that one). She saved our country.
dbww 3 years ago
She sold of state enterprises that were hemoraging money to keep a minority in useless jobs. She attacked the Moronic Liverpool councillers who wanted the successful south to bankroll their industrial wonderland. Sure the poll tax was a mistake, but not as big a mistake as all the policies of the idiot Foot. Oh & btw learn about Labour, the policies of Clem were soft compared to the ultra-leftism of Foot & Benn. They were very different.
dbww 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Margaret Thatcher was bad for Britain. There's nothing useless about the trade union movement. They were 100% justified to fight her all the way during the 1980s especially with the Coal Miner Strikes. What she did to the Liverpool 47 was criminal. She was totally awful, and there are plenty of people in the UK that despises her to this day. When I think of the wonderful and needed reforms of the Clement Atlee government and her nasty policies, there just isn't any comparison.
PsychoPunk1965 3 years ago
When Thatcher came to power inflation was rampent, the economy was going down the tubes. The miners were able to hold the majority of the people to ransom to ensure that their jobs were subsidised. She saved the economy and created the Britain there is today. Without her the standard of living for everyone would be MUCH lower & thousands would still be without there own homes. There is a clear comparison-Clems reforms started the rot, Maggies solved it.
dbww 3 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Had it not been for Clement Atlee's reforms, Britain would sink to the poverty level of the United States whereby there is wage war to the bottom, a tattered safety net, a virtually non-existent trade union movement, and people dying due to medical inflation. I only hope that the British Labour Party can govern once again as a "socialist-party," not as a vehicle for "Neo-Thatcherism." I am hardly militant, but the humane values of social democracy far exceeds the cruelty of the market.
PsychoPunk1965 3 years ago
Most of Attlees reforms were simply from the Beveridge report-these would have been enacted by the Tories, they werent socialist ideals but liberal ones. The only original Lab. reforms were nationalisation & centralisation. The two things that destroyed the British economy. Look at the economy in 79, thats what socialism does-mass unemployment high inflation-its worse for EVERYONE. A rising tide lifts all boats, Britain has proved this as a fact. Thank god Socialism is dead.
dbww 3 years ago
I am familiar with the Beveridge Report, and this makes it ironically possible that if Winston Churchill's Tories would have governed between 1945-1951, some of those reforms would have been instituted anyway like national healthcare and the welfare state. Britain, neverthless, did very well in the 1950s & 60s. Economy goes in cycles, and the energy crises made life horrible for most democracies in the 1970s including the UK. I stand by what I was thought of the Thatcher years.
PsychoPunk1965 3 years ago
"some of those reforms would have been instituted"-That is exactly what I said. However Labours fatal nationalisation wouldnt have. "Britain did well in the 60s". relative to what? Relative to other western nations it didnt. During the 60s British industry declined and growth was slow. Yes there were external factors in the 70s, But Labs policies made things worse, the only way to fix the probs was Thatcherism. What would U have had done? Left things as they were? That was tried and didnt work.
dbww 3 years ago
Fred Thompson is CFR
wraft 4 years ago
Can Fred Thompson actually see anything around him? I ask that because it must be extrememly dark where he is, you know, forever up Maggie Thatcher's backside. Mike S.
25AUG1968 4 years ago
Let's go WAY back...the American Civil War was won by the North. That victory achieved 2 things - One: The end of Slavery; Two: The preservation of the Union.
Yet, 100 years later and counting, it is the South that has given us the most presidents, to the extent that one might suspect that the CIVIL WAR is yet being fought to this day. Why do our presidents come from there and why does the SOUTH exercise such political might?
davideley 4 years ago
Globalization is a good thing?
That's neoliberalism, and I reject it. Thompson is a globalist, as he said JUST now himself.
Fred Thompson was a MEMBER of the Council of Foreign Relations that WROTE the plan to create the North American Union! Dick Cheney was a director! Same with John McCain! Explains his amnesty position!
Ron Paul in 08!
HeatherDuke 4 years ago
Senator Fred Thompson took money from American Gun Owners and from second amendment rights groups and then voted against Gun Owners 14 times.
Fred Thompson was a lobbyist for abortionists.
Ron Paul is strongly pro-life and A+ rated by Gun Owners of America. And Ron Paul got more donations from military personnel in the second quarter than any other candidate.
HeatherDuke 4 years ago
Don't waste your vote on dipshit fred thompson. He's a corporate sellout. There's a reason why cultural marxist(left-wing fox news) wants him to be president. Ron Paul is a REAL REPUBLICan in the vein of the founders + he will end the fed reserve scam + Irs. No more fed income tax each year. Ron Paul is a 9 year republican and will restore greatness to this country once and for all. Stop the corporations' choices for president like thompson, obama and hilary.
Ron Paul in 08.
HeatherDuke 4 years ago
if youtube is to continue to exist as a WORLD FORUM it must post EVERYTHING, and CENSOR nothing. That most of the comments on everything from music videos to innocent video BLOGS are rife with profanity is, alas, merely a symptom of our culture, such as it is, but as with all things, from time to time the truth will eventually seep through. So, YOUTUBE folks, think of the consequences before making mine, or others' comment INCONSEQUENTIAL. Thank you.
davideley 4 years ago
david,"this post will be posted..etc" Is most annoying.I normally come across this on videos for far-right/nazi groups.why do these people fear debate?youtube is a great thing as it is a world forum if the price for that is having to put up with racists/bigots. As much as it pains me,so be it.
MpandiCripps 4 years ago
Mr. Senator: if you think you are some sort of alternative to the other republican nabobs, think again. those few of us who care about such things have your number. so go back from whence you came and leave us in peace. you are an a*****e through and through. what do you think?
davideley 4 years ago
Senator Fred Thompson took money from American Gun Owners and second amendment rights groups and then voted against Gun Owners 14 times in the senate.
Fred Thompson was a lobbyist/lawyer for abortionists.
Ron Paul is strongly pro-life and A+ rated by Gun Owners of America.
Ron Paul got far more donations (53%) from military personnel in the second quarter 2007 than any other presidential candidate.
AnAppealToHeavenWash 4 years ago
Duncan Hunter for President 2008. Support a genuine conservative. Duncan Hunter is actively campaigning on a platform of strong national defense, enforceable borders, and core conservative values.
Visit gohunter08 dot com.
conservativegrunt 4 years ago
UTube is by liberals, for liberals and about liberals
germurph51 4 years ago
I would never vote for anyone who molested children. And I would never vote for Fred Thompson either. Its time to put "Mark Foley" politics to rest. Us conservatives need to send creepy uncle Thompson back to his Amnesty-loving Hollywood home, before he turns our great nation into California.
baitkenh 4 years ago
is youtube now censoring comments? mine, which are w/o profanity, never seem to post. what's up with that?
davideley 4 years ago
davideley,When I first began 'posting'I assumed the same as you.I'm sure the truth is occasionally youtube 'looses' posts.I would imagine it's a 'computer' thing rather than a 'post' thing.Some of the (libelous!)comments I have read I'm positive no censoring takes place.Regards Mpandi
MpandiCripps 4 years ago
one never knows anymore about anything in this country. one thing you CAN count on is that nothing is as it SEEMS. sounds a bit paranoid? perhaps. but in my day the lies they told to get elected never went SO deep. what do you think?
davideley 4 years ago
well, when they say "this post will be posted if approved" that's censorship, plain and simple. someone, i dont know who, reads it and decides.
do i know them, do they know me, do they disagree with what i've written? I dunno.
davideley 4 years ago
david.Youtube does have censorship!whilst you can watch violence, nazi/racist rants even executions(Saddams)and I'm sure worse I haven't came across yet.Youtube will not allow nudity!I can't except that Saddam's hanging is acceptable yet naked people are not.I have always assumed this to be an 'American thing'as I'm sure if youtube was European it would be the other way round.What do you think.Regards Mpandi
MpandiCripps 4 years ago
I agree. america should be lot more like europe, in more ways than one...
davideley 4 years ago
Baroness and Lady is the same thing.
dlk1dlk1 4 years ago
Fred Thompson is a hypocrite. We would not have 12 to 20 million illegals if you would not have contributed to an "open borders" immigration when you were in the Senate. This is why Americans for Better Immigration gave you a grade of "C". America has had enough rhetoric from political hypocrites. Stay on TV and stop "acting" like you're a conservative you fraud.
gchuggins 4 years ago
Fred Thompson is now on the record as saying that he will SLASH Social Security to those currently on it. People are already having to make the hard choices between food, rent, and medicine with what little Social Security they get each month, and now this Hillbilly Frankenstein wants to suffocate them even MORE by cutting it back further. I can't believe anyone can be so inhuman to those who are already helpless, and I can't believe how inhumane people can be by supporting this abomination!
mhirtes12 4 years ago
She is a Baroness not a lady!
mrjonnewman 4 years ago
She can be referred to as 'Lady'.
tisserand1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shes a bitch who screwed the UK for years.
MonsterMozz 4 years ago
I read days ago that Snoozin's campaign planned this media stunt to shore up Dr. Fred's image of experience with foreign affairs. Fred work on the poker face--at least tell us the truth. Don't make a public speech, wrap yourself in Thatcher's skirt, and then say you found about the strategy to look like Reagan a few minutes into the speech.
rijderunner 4 years ago